CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: ‘We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11’

[Harley]

YourNewsWire.com (http://yournewswire.com/cia-911-wtc7/)
July 13, 2017

79-year-old retired CIA agent, Malcom Howard, has made a series of astonishing claims since being released from hospital in New Jersey on Friday and told he has weeks to live. Mr. Howard claims he was involved in the “controlled demolition” (http://yournewswire.com/scientific-study-towers-collapsed-due-to-controlled-demolition/) of World Trade Center 7, the third building that was destroyed on 9/11.

http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CIA-wtc7-confession-678x381.jpg

Excerpts:

[...]

Trained as a civil engineer, Mr. Howard became an explosives expert after being headhunted by the CIA in early 1980s. Mr. Howard says has extensive experience in planting explosives in items as small as cigarette lighters and as large as “80 floor buildings.”

The 79-year-old New Jersey native says he worked on the CIA operation they dubbed “New Century” between May 1997 and September 2001, during a time he says the CIA “was still taking orders from the top.” Mr. Howard says he was part of a cell of 4 operatives tasked with ensuring the demolition was successful.

Mr. Howard says the World Trade Center 7 operation is unique among his demolitions, as it is the only demolition that “we had to pretend wasn’t a demolition job”. He claims he had no problem going through with the deception at the time, because “when you are a patriot, you don’t question the motivation of the CIA or the White House. You assume the bigger purpose is for a greater good. They pick good, loyal people like me, and it breaks my heart to hear the **** talk.”

[...]


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mamvq7LWqRU

Explaining how the building was bought down, Mr. Howard says, “It was a classic controlled demolition with explosives. We used super-fine military grade nanothermite composite materials as explosives. The hard part was getting thousands of pounds of explosives, fuses and ignition mechanisms into the building without causing too much concern. But almost every single office in the Building 7 was rented by the CIA (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-cia-lost-office-in-wtc/), the Secret Service, or the military, which made it easier.”

[...]

Mr. Howard claims he has “no direct knowledge” about the destruction of North and South Towers of the World Trade Center, explaining that “CIA operations are very specific” and that it is common to be working on a larger project while only understanding a small piece of the puzzle.

But he has advice for investigators seeking to understand the entire puzzle and work out who was behind the most devastating attack on American soil in history.

“Follow the money.”

“When you want to find out who is behind something, just follow the money. Look at the trades made just before 9/11. These are the guys that knew what was coming. The sons of CIA agents, government officials. Close relatives of the most powerful men in America. Cheney, Rumsfeld. They all got rich. It wasn’t just the contracts awarded to their friends in the construction business and the wars and the kickbacks.”

“It was insider trading.”

[...]

“There is only one organization that spans the entire world, and let me tell you now, it isn’t and it never was al-Qaeda.”

It’s the CIA.

“There could never be a real investigation. The entire shadow government, as you call them now, are implicated.”

[onawah]

Is yourNewsWire a reputable source?
If so, that could be a major story!

[Harley]

Is yourNewsWire a reputable source?
If so, that could be a major story!

You are right to question Onawah. YourNewsWire.com appears to be 'iffy'.

I was reposting from someone who had sent it to me, without checking.

I guess The Blue Parrots have finally gotten to me.

[Rhah]

I'm not familiar with YourNewsWire so I won't make any claims on their validity, but how exactly did they obtain this confession? Was it recorded? Were they there at his bedside? They are quoting him in a very detailed manner, yet nowhere in the article do they name their source.
And of course the writer could be paraphrasing - which would make little sense if you're breaking a story of such importance - but the quotations, to me, don't sound like how a 79-year-old with only a couple of weeks to live would speak on a matter of this magnitude and such personal significance.

To me, it looks like a classic example of an unverifiable story crafted by a journalist that is now being spread and shared all over the internet just to smear us. But that's my opinion.

If true then this could indeed be a major story and it should be followed up, but for now I remain sceptical.

[Matt P]

Quite frankly I don't need a source or further verification. I already know our own government did 9/11. The nail is already in the coffin and this gentleman's story is perfectly plausible but it doesn't matter anyway.

Matt

[Satori]

See, a peer reviewed article I wrote in 2015 on this very subject and published in the Journal of 911 Studies and Global Research:

http://www.journalof911studies.com/resources/2015LooneyVol40Mar.pdf

There is no question but that on 9/11/01 WTC 7 was destroyed by conventional methods and that WTC 1 and 2 were destroyed by a combination of methods, some of which involved high tech methods. The official conspiracy theory of 911 is demonstrably false.

[onawah]

No question it was an inside job, the problem is getting the message to the public.
It seems like the only way such messages finally get out is by a truly explosive whistleblower who even the MSM can't ignore.

See, a peer reviewed article I wrote in 2015 on this very subject and published in the Journal of 911 Studies and Global Research:

http://www.journalof911studies.com/resources/2015LooneyVol40Mar.pdf

There is no question but that on 9/11/01 WTC 7 was destroyed by conventional methods and that WTC 1 and 2 were destroyed by a combination of methods, some of which involved high tech methods. The official conspiracy theory of 911 is demonstrably false.

[Satori]

Quite frankly I don't need a source or further verification. I already know our own government did 9/11. The nail is already in the coffin and this gentleman's story is perfectly plausible but it doesn't matter anyway.

Matt

I would respectfully nudge you the other way when you say it does not matter. I agree with you in the sense that we cannot change what happened, and what followed in the wake of 9/11 to this day, or take these beings head on. But, I believe it does matter to us all in terms of deciding for ourselves where we stand and how we can make a difference for the better individually and locally. That is what they are trying to destroy. Individualism, critical thinking, humanity, empathy, love....

[Harley]

Yes, I don't disagree with any of your comments (so far :)). I think most of us here have come to many of the same 'Theoretical' (unconfirmed) Conclusions about 9/11.

But this particular article is about a supposed 'Official Insider/Whistleblower' and I'd like to explore the possible or plausible validity of his claims.

Or

Debunk him, his story, and the news site and throw it in the Hoax Bin.

Whichever comes first. :)

[Harley]

So I'll start with a possible connection to his story.


To me, it looks like a classic example of an unverifiable story crafted by a journalist that is now being spread and shared all over the internet just to smear us. But that's my opinion.

If true then this could indeed be a major story and it should be followed up, but for now I remain sceptical.

Yes. I just did a search and found that quite a few outlets are now publishing this story, which is how I would expect a story like this to propagate.

Personally, I didn't take-away much info from the article that I either don't already know or have surmised. But I thought, if vetted, this article would provide me with some nice verification. Isn't that what we all are looking for?

But wait. There was one thing that really caught my attention, and that was his mention of "the CIA operation they dubbed “New Century” between May 1997 and September 2001, during a time he says the CIA “was still taking orders from the top.” So I did a search on that, and when I was about to give up I found a link to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century) that caught my attention.

Project for the New American Century (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century)
(Now you may see why it caught my attention. :))

Although I didn't find anything definitive here in regard to a 'CIA Operation New Century', as I read through it I began to notice some interesting information that just could/might/possibly (being careful here :)) point in the direction of such an operation.

Here are a few excerpts. But if you're really interested you should read through the article, including the Foot Notes.

........................................................................................

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was a neoconservative[1][2][3] think tank based in Washington, D.C. that focused on United States foreign policy. It was established as a non-profit educational organization in 1997 [Note: See first excerpt in OP], and founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan.[4][5] PNAC's stated goal was "to promote American global leadership."[6] The organization stated that "American leadership is good both for America and for the world," and sought to build support for "a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity."[7]

Of the twenty-five people who signed PNAC's founding statement of principles, ten went on to serve in the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush, including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz.[8][9][10][11] Observers such as Irwin Stelzer and Dave Grondin have suggested that the PNAC played a key role in shaping the foreign policy of the Bush Administration, particularly in building support for the Iraq War.[12][13][14][15]

[...]

Rebuilding America's Defenses

One of the PNAC's most influential publications was a 90-page report titled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century. Citing the PNAC's 1997 Statement of Principles, Rebuilding America's Defenses asserted that the United States should "seek to preserve and extend its position of global leadership" by "maintaining the preeminence of U.S. military forces."[45] The report's primary author was Thomas Donnelly, and Donald Kagan and Gary Schmitt are credited as project chairmen. It also lists the names of 27 other participants that contributed papers or attended meetings related to the production of the report, six of whom subsequently assumed key defense and foreign policy positions in the Bush administration.[46][47]

[,,,]

According to the report, current levels of defense spending were insufficient, forcing policymakers "to try ineffectually to “manage” increasingly large risks." [...] Rebuilding America's Defenses recommended establishing four core missions for US military forces: the defense of the "American homeland," the fighting and winning of "multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars," the performance of "'constabular' duties associated with shaping the security environment" in key regions, and the transformation of US forces "to exploit the 'revolution in military affairs.'" Its specific recommendations included the maintenance of US nuclear superiority, an increase of the active personnel strength of the military from 1.4 to 1.6 million people, the redeployment of US forces to Southeast Europe and Asia, and the "selective" modernization of US forces. The report [...] favored the development of "global missile defenses," and the control of "space and cyberspace," including the creation of a new military service with the mission of "space control."

[...]

Critics
Rebuilding America's Defenses

Written before the September 11 attacks, and during political debates of the War in Iraq, a section of Rebuilding America's Defenses entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" became the subject of considerable controversy. The passage suggested that the transformation of American armed forces through "new technologies and operational concepts" was likely to be a long one, "absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."[45] Journalist John Pilger pointed to this passage when he argued that Bush administration had used the events of September 11 as an opportunity to capitalize on long-desired plans.[48]

Some critics went further, asserting that Rebuilding America's Defenses should be viewed as a program for global American hegemony. Writing in Der Spiegel in 2003, Jochen Bölsche claimed that Rebuilding America's Defenses "had been developed by PNAC for Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Libby," and was "devoted to matters of 'maintaining US pre-eminence, thwarting rival powers and shaping the global security system according to US interests.'"[42][49] British MP Michael Meacher made similar allegations in 2003, stating that Rebuilding America's Defences was "a blueprint for the creation of a global Pax Americana," which had been "drawn up for" key members of the Bush administration.[50]

Focus on military strategies, versus diplomatic strategies

PNAC fellow Reuel Marc Gerecht stated:

"We have no choice but to re-instill in our foes and friends the fear that attaches to any great power.... Only a war against Saddam Hussein will decisively restore the awe that protects American interests abroad and citizens at home".[54]

The Strategic Studies Institute' s Jeffrey Record in his monograph Bounding the Global War on Terrorism, Gabriel Kolko, research professor emeritus at York University and author of Another Century of War? (The New Press, 2002), in his article published in CounterPunch, and William Rivers Pitt, in Truthout, respectively, argued that the PNAC's goals of military hegemony exaggerated what the military can accomplish, that they failed to recognize "the limits of US power", and that favoring pre-emptive exercise of military might over diplomatic strategies could have "adverse side effects."[55][56][57] (Paul Reynolds and Max Boot have made similar observations.[38][58])

End of the organization

By the end of 2006, PNAC was "reduced to a voice-mail box and a ghostly website [with a] single employee … left to wrap things up" [...] In 2006 former executive director of the PNAC Gary Schmitt said PNAC had never been intended to "go on forever," and had "already done its job"

[...] The Project for the New American Century ceased to function in 2006;[19] it was replaced by a new think-tank named the Foreign Policy Initiative (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Policy_Initiative), co-founded by Kristol and Kagan in 2009.

.................................................. ......................................

Now I know this post is a bit long, but if you only read my excerpts you will have to 'Read between the lines'. So I encourage you to read the entire article to better understand the implications.

Here are a few questions you may want to keep in mind while studying this:

1. What would be an effective way:

* To garner major support with a minimum of resistance for a major increase in Defense (Offense) spending?

* To garner major support with a minimum of resistance for the redeployment of US forces to Southeast Europe and Asia, in order to increase the performance of "'constabular' duties associated with shaping the security environment" in key regions, and the transformation of US forces "to exploit the 'revolution in military affairs'"?

* To eliminate any "adverse side effects" that would be associated with any pre-emptive exercise of military might over diplomatic strategies?

* To "re-instill in our foes and friends the fear that attaches to any great power"?

* To go to "war against Saddam Hussein [which] will decisively restore the awe that protects American interests abroad and citizens at home"?


Project for the New American Century (PNAC)

Operation New Century

Hmn...

[turiya]

The American Enterprise Institute (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Enterprise_Institute#Members) also received a number of PNAC members...


Among the prominent former government officials now affiliated with AEI are: Dick Cheney (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney), vice president of the United States under George W. Bush, is a member of AEI's Board of Trustees (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_Trustees);[6] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Enterprise_Institute#cite_note-Board_of_Trustees-6) John R. Bolton (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_R._Bolton), former Ambassador to the United Nations (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Ambassador_to_the_United_Nations); Lynne Cheney (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynne_Cheney), former chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Endowment_for_the_Humanities); Paul Wolfowitz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Wolfowitz), former Deputy Secretary of Defense (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Deputy_Secretary_of_Defense). AEI current scholars include Kevin Hassett (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Hassett), Ayaan Hirsi Ali (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayaan_Hirsi_Ali), Michael Barone (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Barone_%28pundit%29), Nicholas Eberstadt (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Eberstadt), Jonah Goldberg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah_Goldberg), Phil Gramm (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Gramm), Glenn Hubbard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Hubbard_%28economist%29), Frederick Kagan (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Kagan), Leon Kass (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Kass), Jon Kyl (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Kyl), Charles Murray (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Murray_%28political_scientist%29), Norman Ornstein (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Ornstein), Mark J. Perry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_J._Perry), Danielle Pletka (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danielle_Pletka), Michael Rubin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Rubin), Gary Schmitt (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Schmitt), Christina Hoff Sommers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christina_Hoff_Sommers), Jim Talent (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Talent), Peter J. Wallison (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_J._Wallison), Bill Lenner, and W. Bradford Wilcox (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Bradford_Wilcox).[7] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Enterprise_Institute#cite_note-AEI-Fellows-7)
.

[amor]

People who can murder thousands of innocent humans deliberately and with forethought will also do the same to the rest of its citizens, men, women and their children and find a way to make profit from it, probably by selling the physical continent of North American to the Aliens, which I think they have already done and now have planned and are incrementally executing the Genocide of all citizens of the USA. Donald knows a lot, but I do not think he is "read in" that far.

[Eram]

I'm not familiar with YourNewsWire so I won't make any claims on their validity, but how exactly did they obtain this confession? Was it recorded? Were they there at his bedside? They are quoting him in a very detailed manner, yet nowhere in the article do they name their source.

Websites like yournewswire and neonettle never offer sources in the articles that they produce, which to me is one of many signs that they are not in the game of getting to the truth.

Many of the articles that they produce are pure fantasy and fiction as far as I can tell.

I'm not sure whether their intent is simply to make a profit on people who do not see them for what they are, to muddy the waters or both.

One giveaway in this article is the description the supposed CIA operative gave on how the WTC7 was demolished.


Mr. Howard explains that WTC 7 was “loaded with explosives in strategic places” in the month leading up to the day that changed the course of American history. On September 11th, while the North and South towers burned, fuses were ignited in World Trade Center 7, and nanothermite explosions hollowed out the building, destroying the steel structure, removing the reinforcements, and allowing the office fires to tear through the rest of the building, hollowing it out like a shell.

Anyone who has done but a little study into the collapse of WTC7 knows that this is an inaccurate sequence of events.
Office fires did not gut and hollow out anything in WTC7 and did not tear through the rest of the building .
The office fires that only burned on some lower levels of the building were all but burned out when they set of the final chain of demolition that made the building collapse.

I can imagine the honest mistake Harley, cause the website is professionally set up, which makes it look legit at first glance.
Sadly, this website is a waste of our time, other then to inform others not to take it serious.

[Harley]

I can imagine the honest mistake Harley, cause the website is professionally set up, which makes it look legit at first glance.
Sadly, this website is a waste of our time, other then to inform others not to take it serious.

Oh I fully agree with you Eram.
I simply stated that in a much more brief context! :)



Is yourNewsWire a reputable source?
If so, that could be a major story!

You are right to question Onawah. YourNewsWire.com appears to be 'iffy'.

I was reposting from someone who had sent it to me, without checking.

I guess The Blue Parrots have finally gotten to me.

But I also don't believe it's a good idea to 'Throw the baby out with the bathwater' (Although there may be times when I might feel like drop-kicking one! LOL!).

That's why I spent the time to do a little research on his story, to see if I could find anything verifiable. As you know, mixing some truth with bunk is a common trait of disinfo. But if you don't DIG for it you'll miss it, every time.

And while I didn't exactly verify anything, I believe that I found some very interesting possible connection to at least one part of the story.

The baby is still fine . . . So far. :)

[Eram]

Fair enough Harley and I hope you don't see my post as an attack on you.

I just get worked up whenever I see this kind of junk from yournewswire or neonettle popping up.

Just last week I saw a journalist in the Netherlands posting an article from neonettle that claimed to have Brad Pitt on record making revelations about the pedo networks in Hollywood.
Sensational, clickbait non sense of course (Brad Pitt talking about it), but it got spread like wildfire nonetheless.

How do we stop disinfo that is set up like this?
That's my frustration.

[Harley]

Nope! I didn't take it as such, Eram. You're good. I'm good. We're all good! :)

You can't stop it. I see the same click-bait garbage all the time on Facebook. It's loaded with it because most users are so vulnerable, and they know it.

I wouldn't be on Facebook at all if it wasn't for my family and friends.

And YouTube is much the same. Because of the $$$.

However YouTube is also very useful.

:)

[WhiteLove]

Something to think about: Why was this content not released as a video?

[ghostrider]

As always, its up to each human being to do the hard work and discover the truth for his/her self ... The confession of a CIA employee has to be taken with a grain of salt, remember those people are trained to beat lie detectors, skilled in the double agent role, espionage, counter terrorism, etc ... Can one really trust a spy ??? In my thinking, this guy had plenty of time to tell the truth, why wait until death is at the door if you're a true patriot ??? Im on the fence about this person until I do some digging ...

[Molly4US]

There are several possibilities that I can think of which could explain this old guys testimony, if indeed he made the above claims:
1. He could be an imposter of a CIA agent, and thus trying to besmirch the CIA.
2. He could be lying or delusional.
3. He could be lying for the purpose of being reported, for the further purpose of sending a coded message to someone.
4. He could be being mind-controlled/subliminal frequency-controlled to say this.
5. He could have been hypnotized into saying this.
6. He could be lying under the threat that if he doesn't, that hostages will be killed.
7. He may lying, yet following the orders to say this, of someone mis-representing himself as a CIA superior.
8. He may be telling the truth. In which case I would say that these CIA guys who are used to listening to radio-orders, had an imposter, an enemy of the U.S. take over without their knowledge, and they followed the orders of the imposter/enemy.
9. He may be telling the truth. In which case I would say that these CIA guys were mind-controlled/subliminal frequency-controlled to do this.
10. He could be telling the truth, but like he says, he refers to building 7, not the WTC itself. I.E. mind-controlled or following orders of an imposter to blow up building 7, while the terrorists simultaneously plot, hi-jack passenger jets, and fly into the WTC to kill thousands and terrorize the nation. Building 7 was empty when it fell. Blowing up Building 7 does not mean that the CIA blew up the WTC or hi-jacked the those jets, or the jets at LAX that day that were plotted to be downed, or the passenger jet downed that day over Pennsylvania. What a sick frame-job. And Yes, a warcrime against the U.S., but not by the CIA. This is a war crime falling under the definition of Perfidy.

There is a whole lot of radio impostering, and subliminal/frequency mind-control happening in California. It is disgusting. If people would follow the Ten Commandments, follow ethics, follow current law, follow procedures and not stray from that, and do good always like your Mama taught you, then we can keep these breakers of the Geneva Frequency Plan 1975 etc at bay longer, and until my guys, the U.S., can stomp these vibes of evil out of the airwaves.

Here is an analogy which speaks to the CIA agents "confession" which is also being done in actuality by terrorist networks in California: If a person has been hit in the head by someone who doesn't like them and has a nauseating concussion from that; while at the same time is food-poisoned deliberately by someone else who doesn't like them; while put against their will onto a tea-cups ride by someone who doesn't like them and throws up; and is shot with a sonic weapon in the stomach by someone who doesn't like them and throws up; and sees someone commit a crime and their head is subsequently grabbed and shaken like a milkshake by someone who doesn't like them; and then catches the flu from their children's visiting friend who does like them: the question can be posed, "What made you feel sick?" The answer has been deliberately complicated by Comorbidity, a series of purposely varied assaults which cause one type of effect. Very deliberate tactics by a very well-orchestrated group. In an orchestra you have many kinds of instruments. You have small grouping of the same instrument sitting in clusters. They are all playing their music according to how it is written ahead of time. They know that if they keep to the music that the overall piece will be a success. Bad thing is: There is a bad band in town. They create a "snowball" effect: I believe they are ISIS.




I'm not familiar with YourNewsWire so I won't make any claims on their validity, but how exactly did they obtain this confession? Was it recorded? Were they there at his bedside? They are quoting him in a very detailed manner, yet nowhere in the article do they name their source.
And of course the writer could be paraphrasing - which would make little sense if you're breaking a story of such importance - but the quotations, to me, don't sound like how a 79-year-old with only a couple of weeks to live would speak on a matter of this magnitude and such personal significance.

To me, it looks like a classic example of an unverifiable story crafted by a journalist that is now being spread and shared all over the internet just to smear us. But that's my opinion.

If true then this could indeed be a major story and it should be followed up, but for now I remain sceptical.

[winstonsmith]

What are the odds that the same reporter could get two deathbed confessions from intelligence operatives in the same year?
http://yournewswire.com/mi5-agent-killed-princess-diana/
AMAZING!

[Omni]

As far as I know YourNewsWire.com is a disinformation website intended to discredit people who end up linking their very plausible stories.

[Leon55]

Websites like yournewswire and neonettle never offer sources in the articles that they produce, which to me is one of many signs that they are not in the game of getting to the truth.

Yeah, I noticed this before as well. They have done this a couple of times in the past few months that I can remember.

This is not a trustworthy website, just clickbait.

[onawah]

John Lear in his most recent update conversation with Kerry Cassidy said it was impossible that the twin towers were blown up by explosives.
uvc61yy2QMk
He said it was done with weaponry mounted on orbiting satellites, and that the Oklahoma disaster was done the same way.
Also that the planes were holograms, which I thought from the moment I saw the initial eyewitness videos that were on the network news the day it happened. Those videos weren't seen again on network news--they were too revealing.

[onawah]

At 46 minutes into the John Lear update at
uvc61yy2QMk
Lear says Flight MH17 never took off, that Flight 370 was flown to Israel where it was outfitted with fly by wire devices so that it could be controlled by two fighter jets which accompanied it after it took off.
Israel shot it down via the jets.
They had killed all the passengers on board, then they installed the electronics and took off from Israel and into the path of MH17 and flew east into the area controlled by Israel and then shot down MH17.
When the first rescue doctors got to the crash site, they said the passenger's bodies had been dead for at least 3 weeks.
So that was 370 and they were trying to make people believe it was MH17.
And the funerals for people allegedly on Flight MH17 were all fake.
The people there were hired actors pretending to be family members of MH17 victims

[ExomatrixTV]

Hk0eR7aIVrw