Crowdsource the Truth Interviews Lionel

[Tommi H]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RO7f-Slo3m0

[Bill Ryan]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RO7f-Slo3m0

Hi there, and a belated personal welcome to the forum!

But this post is of almost zero value. I don't know who 'Crowdsource the Truth' is, and I certainly don't know who 'Lionel' is. And no-one here is going to watch a 70 minute video just to find out. :)

Please don't just copy the video title (video titles are often very poor!), and while copying the video text can be helpful, of far greater value is for you to add in your own words why you think a video is worth watching, and what it's about. Thx!

:focus: — whatever that is.

[Tommi H]

So if you don´t know who they are, that makes it zero value for every member of Avalon. Okay then.

[Bill Ryan]

So if you don´t know who they are, that makes it zero value for every member of Avalon. Okay then.

Yes, that's actually true — if you can take a moment to see what I mean. Videos are posted every day, and members who recommend them describe — at least briefly! — what they're about. It's also actually best if a member can describe in their own words why they think it's worth sharing.

That helps us all, in a world where we're all bombarded with information, almost every hour, urging us to watch this and read that. No-one has that amount of time to watch everything, so everyone has to make informed choices what to devote their time to. A 5 minute video can be checked out quickly, but an hour long video is rather different.

All I could see was three people sitting round a dinner table. Nothing else. I have no idea who they are, so I'm not going to watch it... there's no reason for me to.

You have to please see this from that point of view. Members taking a moment to write helpful descriptions of videos that they're recommending works VERY well for everyone. Saying nothing at all, when the people in the video seem unknown (at least to some members!) doesn't really work very well at all.

[Cidersomerset]

I will help out a bit here Lionel is a attorney and alternate media analyst based in
New York but originally from Florida. I post a lot of his vids here and he mainly
covers the US and world geo political position and is a regular guest political pundit
on RT America. He is a bit flamboyant and may not be to every ones taste but he
does cover conspiracy theories from JFK, false flags , 9/11 the corrupt US political
system and much more. He is up to date with current affairs and is a very
interesting character imo on the lines of Jim Marrs, Alex Jones ,Rich Dolan,Corbett
David Icke etc but different again. Others may disagree with my accessment and I
do not mean he is as expert as say Richard in political/UFO History or the others in
their specialized topics, but he is worth a listen if you can get on his frequency,
and his specialities are US law, politics , mainstream and alternate news media..

Lionel Nation...
https://www.youtube.com/user/LionelY2K/videos


His latest RT guestspot
"NYT admits exclusive climate change report was fake news" — Lionel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01arIX2k5To
Published on 11 Aug 2017
Media analyst Lionel talks to RT about the New York Times's “exclusive”
climate change story, which failed to mention that a scientific report had
been public for months.

====================================================
====================================================

Jim Marrs Eulogium: Investigative Journalism Hero, Conspiracy Analyst, JFK Assassination Expert
erqxYtBrqVk
Published on 3 Aug 2017
Acclaimed investigative journalist and beloved member of the conspiracy theory
and UFO research community, Jim Marrs, has passed away, Coast to Coast notes.

===================================================

9/11 Awakening: My Personal Moment of Truth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLI4DxydG5A

Published on 25 Sep 2016

Justice In Focus: 9/11 | 2016 - A Weekend Symposium in NYC (September 10,
2016) Great Hall of Cooper Union in New York City

This is the story of my awakening. My moment of truth. But first, a proem.

I am not a truther. (And as Gore Vidal noted famously) nor am I a conspiracy
theorist; I’m a conspiracy analyst. The official story of 9/11 is folklorish and
mythological. It’s beyond unbelievable and is, like Napoleon’s definition of history, a
set of lies that people have agreed upon. If you’ve never spent any time
deconstructing the amazing rewriting of the physical evidence, eyewitness
testimony, the laws of gravity, physics, structural engineering, architectural
science, piloting, aerodynamics, evidence, common sense — well, you’ve missed
one of life’s rare events.

But there’s no evidence of it being a US government “inside job” or false flag or
state-sponsored. There. Feel relieved? I know that’s what bothers many Americans,
especially those in the Ted Baxter sockpuppet media. I mean, when has the
government ever lied about its knowledge or complicity? Heavens! Now, that’s not
to say it’s not a possibility or unlikely or even far-fetched. No, certainly not. There’s
simply no evidence of it. Nor is there evidence of motivation, goal or intended
results or beneficiaries. Cui bono? Cui prodest? I think we know, certainly. But
that’s not evidence of anything. Notwithstanding a mountain of fascinating facts
and data that scream out for further investigation and review. Think a permanent
Russell-Sartre Tribunal of sorts. Anything but the dog and pony show of Congress.
And on a personal, individual level, and from having spent my life investigating
reality versus “history” I do not believe that President Cheney or his manservant
Dubya knew anything in advance or were involved directly in any aspects of our
day of horror. Aside from the lack of evidence indicating such, there’s the benefit of
plausible deniability and the absolute folly that would involve their involvement.
While I believe also that Pearl Harbor was not as recorded or believed, I do not
believe FDR was directly involved or had knowledge beforehand. Know when to be
detective; know when to be juror. Suspicion versus the weighing of probity. Just
because you have an Aha! moment in determining that a piece of evidence as
advanced is not what you believe to be true, culpability is not assigned thereafter. Dig?

My accompanying 9/11 podcast: http://lionelmedia.com/2016/09/11/lio...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDIYC0TeCjI
CSPAN: Richard Gage Challenging 9/11 Myths, Lies and Conspiracy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8bZFR8XfMQ

Lionel on the Alex Jones Show With Roger Stone: Megyn Kelly’s Demise, Mueller’s
and Comey the Clown
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPtsCoLJMqg
Published on 13 Jun 2017

[Satori]

I like Lionel. But I disagree with him that there is no evidence of complicity in 9/11 by certain individuals at the highest levels of US government. What these individuals knew and did before 9/11 must be compared to what they knew and did after, such as destruction of evidence, refusal to conduct a real investigation, lying about the cause of the destruction of WTC 1, 2 and 7, pretext for "war [of] terrorism" etc...

[Cidersomerset]

I like Lionel. But I disagree with him that there is no evidence of complicity
in 9/11 by certain individuals at the highest levels of US government

I do not know if you watched this vid ? Lionel explains his overview 8 mins in &
that he shares the sceptism of most of these government/intel psyops. He then
goes into an overview of the events of 9/11 and questions all the official reasons.
But does not seem to go into the deep conspiracy speculation though he has seen
it all on the web and does recommend Richard Gage and the documentary Loose
change and probably more on other vids. But as a practicing lawyer he is reluctant
to accuse individuals but does question the whole event and obviously has more to
share in private and may of said more in vids I have not seen , he explains it in his
own words in the vid below and says we need a real enquiry to get to the bottom of it.

I do not know his position on Judy Wood or other theories like mini nukes etc...

xDIYC0TeCjI

==================================================

I think it was definitely a inside job and there is plenty of proof as far as I'm concerned..


James Corbett did a series of 9/11 suspects last year....

9/11 Suspects: Rudy Giuliani

This thread is more about the geo - political events leading up , during and after 9/11
Some vids have timed out....
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?93118-9-11-Suspects-Rudy-Giuliani&highlight=James+Corbett+9%2F11

[Cidersomerset]

This is a good example of Lionel in a current topical panel discussion ,
he is trying to get over the point the demonstration was exploited to under
mind Trump by any means by the left , deep state via mainstream media.....

LT5dZ7eyx3k

Published on 14 Aug 2017
John Hajjar, deputy director of the U.S.-Middle East Alliance to Support Donald
Trump, Medea Benjamin - Co-Founder of Code Pink & legal and media analyst -
Lionel debate the issue.ivision deepens: Who's to blame for the incident at
Charlottesville?

[Cidersomerset]

I just saw this report and illustrates Lionels scope in answering questions
most pundits would shy away from as it cross's over into the scy - fy realm
to many mainstreamers....


'Never mind North Korea, worry about AI in charge of dropping nukes' — Lionel

-xN4EjACF34

Published on 15 Aug 2017
BILLIONAIRE Elon Musk has claimed that people should be more worried about
Artificial Intelligence (AI) than the threat posed by North Korea. The SpaceX
founder, who is hoping to become the first man to establish a human colony
on Mars, said humans should be “vastly” more concerned about robots taking
over the world.

Mr Musk’s tweets come after Trump and Kim Jong-un continue to ratchet up
fears of World War 3 with their foreboding rhetoric. The US President has
threatened to unleash “fire and fury” upon Pyongyang, while the hermit
kingdom has promised to strike the US-territory of Guam by mid-August.
Despite escalating world tensions, Mr Musk dismissed the imminent threat
and tweeted: “If you're not concerned about AI safety, you should be. Vastly
more risk than North Korea.” In his tweet, he included a image of a framed
picture of a worried-looking woman, with the bold, capped up words reading
“IN THE END THE MACHINES WILL WIN”.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/8...