PDA

View Full Version : Congress Quietly Passed A Bill Allowing Warrantless Searches Of Homes NEAR WASHINGTON METRO AREA



ramus
26th August 2017, 16:25
Congress Quietly Passed A Bill Allowing Warrantless Searches Of Homes—Only 1% Opposed It

24 Aug 2017 Posted by Rachel Blevins

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/congress-passes-bill-allowing-homes-searched-without-warrant/


A major red flag was buried in the text of a bill with a seemingly harmless title.

(TFTP) A bill that will allow homes to be searched without a warrant was passed with overwhelming support by the United States Congress, and signed into law by President Trump—and it happened with no media coverage and very little fanfare.

On the surface, House Joint Resolution 76 looks harmless. The title of the bill claims that its purpose is “Granting the consent and approval of Congress for the Commonwealth of Virginia, the State of Maryland, and the District of Columbia to enter into a compact relating to the establishment of the Washington Metrorail Safety Commission.”

“Whereas the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, an interstate compact agency of the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the State of Maryland, provides transportation services to millions of people each year, the safety of whom is paramount; Whereas an effective and safe Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority system is essential to the commerce and prosperity of the National Capital region; Whereas the Tri-State Oversight Committee, created by a memorandum of understanding amongst these 3 jurisdictions, has provided safety oversight of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.”

The proposal for a safety commission to act as a wing of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority may sound logical, when its power includes things such as the ability to “Adopt, revise, and distribute a written State Safety Oversight Program” and to “Review, approve, oversee, and enforce the adoption and implementation of WMATA’s Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan.”

However, there is one major red flag buried within the text of the bill that stems from the list of “powers” given to the Washington Metrorail Safety Commission, and it violates one of the basic tenants of the U.S. Constitution.

“In performing its duties, the Commission, through its Board or designated employees or agents, may:Enter upon the WMATA Rail System and, upon reasonable notice and a finding by the chief executive officer that a need exists, upon any lands, waters, and premises adjacent to the WMATA Rail System, including, without limitation, property owned or occupied by the federal government, for the purpose of making inspections, investigations, examinations, and testing as the Commission may deem necessary to carry out the purposes of this MSC Compact, and such entry shall not be deemed a trespass.”



The text gives the Commission the authority to enter property near the Metro Rail System “without limitation” and without a warrant, for the purpose of “making inspections, investigations, examinations, and testing.”

This clearly goes against the Fourth Amendment, which states that Americans’ rights “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause.”

When the bill was brought to a vote in the House of Representatives, there were only five Congressmen who voted against it: Representatives Justin Amash, a Republican from Michigan; Walter Jones, a Republican from North Carolina; Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky; Alex Mooney, a Republican from West Virginia; and Mark Sanford, a Republican from South Carolina.

Amash called out the hypocrisy surrounding the fact that even though this legislation is in clear violation of the Constitution, it was passed by Congress with overwhelming support. “Only 5 of us voted against bill allowing govt to enter/search private property in parts of VA, MD & DC w/o warrant,” He wrote on Twitter.

This is not the first time Congress has quietly passed a bill that will take away some of the most basic rights from law-abiding citizens in the U.S., and it won’t be the last. One of the most important things to remember about this legislation is that it was ignored by the media, and while it may only affect the Washington D.C. metro area now, it could be laying the blueprint for future legislation across the country.

frodo13
26th August 2017, 18:39
Owned or operated by the federal government according to the paragraph you quoted. The language seems a little confusing the way it was written.

Desire
27th August 2017, 01:03
1."premises adjacent to the WMATA" and 2 "to enter property near the Metro Rail system " do not appear to be Government owned.

ramus
27th August 2017, 14:14
IT LOOKS LIKE A CARTE BLANCHE TO ME . BELOW IS THE BILL:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-joint-resolution/76/text
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“(a) Conduct, or cause to be conducted, inspections, investigations, examinations, and testing of WMATA personnel and contractors, property, equipment, facilities, rolling stock, and operations of the WMATA Rail System, including, without limitation, electronic information and databases through reasonable means, which may include issuance of subpoenas;

“(b) Enter upon the WMATA Rail System and, upon reasonable notice and a finding by the chief executive officer that a need exists, upon any lands, waters, and premises adjacent to the WMATA Rail System, including, without limitation, property owned or occupied by the federal government, for the purpose of making inspections, investigations, examinations, and testing as the Commission may deem necessary to carry out the purposes of this MSC Compact, and such entry shall not be deemed a trespass. The Commission shall make reasonable reimbursement for any actual damage resulting to any such adjacent lands, waters, and premises as a result of such activities;

“N. Conflict of Laws

“60. Any conflict between any authority granted herein, or the exercise of such authority, and the provisions of the WMATA Compact shall be resolved in favor of the exercise of such authority by the Commission.

“61. All other general or special laws inconsistent with this MSC Compact are hereby declared to be inapplicable to the Commission or its activities.”.

RIGHT TO ALTER, AMEND, OR REPEAL

Sec. 2. The right to alter, amend, or repeal this joint resolution is expressly reserved. The consent granted by this joint resolution shall not be construed as impairing or in any manner affecting any right or jurisdiction of the United States in and over the region that forms the subject of the Compact.

CONSTRUCTION AND SEVERABILITY

Sec. 3. It is intended that the provisions of this Compact shall be reasonably and liberally construed to effectuate the purposes thereof. If any part or application of this Compact, or legislation enabling the Compact, is held invalid, the remainder of the Compact or its application to other situations or persons shall not be affected.

INCONSISTENCY OF LANGUAGE

Sec. 4. The validity of this Compact shall not be affected by any insubstantial differences in its form or language as adopted by the State of Maryland, the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the District of Columbia.

EFFECTIVE DATE

Sec. 5. This joint resolution shall take effect on the date of enactment of this joint resolution.

Marikins
27th August 2017, 19:40
I hope everyone in the US gives their Congressman holy hell on this, not just Virginia, DC and Maryland. Also I would alert my state level representatives in Va, Md and DC because this slid by everyone. I know we all have done that kind of thing often to no result, but you have to register your non-compliance on this stuff or they have a carte blanche. You know the rules.

Such a slippery slope leading to say ALL residences nationwide near metropolitan bus lines, subway routes, or stations (so all city residences) nationally can be searched without a warrant.

I'll be interested to see what replies I get. Last time I wrote about some violation of the Constitution, one sent me a form letter on corn subsidies! They may actually be clones operated from a hive mind as some fantasists insist because that appears to be the only explanation for their clueless and unconstitutional behavior.