Crowdfunded - E.T. Contact: They Are Here

[findingneo]

E.T. CONTACT: THEY ARE HERE

(A.K.A "GODS AMONG US: THE SCIENCE OF CONTACT")

"A DOCUMENTARY ON EXTRATERRESTRIAL INTELLIGENCE & THE SCIENCE OF OTHERWORLDLY CONTACT"

The above is from the website and page, http://www.godsamongus.com/

The trailer appears to be filmed in a similar fashion to the "Sirius" and "Unacknowledged" movie documentaries by Dr Steven Greer. This documentary is also crowd funded.

I see a lot of happy faces, and pro contact, and I see Dr David Jacobs. I expect to see folk who will consider themselves hybrids, from some of the faces in the trailers. Will this be objective, as is possible? Will this be a pro contact documentary or a balanced documentary of the positive and negative aspects of contact? Will Dr David Jacobs be permitted to express his full findings and who else will be on this documentary expressing the perhaps not so benevolent aspects of contact? Will there be a summary and discussion about both the positive and negative aspects? There are board members in this documentary I think, who are on the board of FREE. Will there be polls used from the FREE survey results, to argue in favor of the positive aspects of contact, and if so, who is on the FREE board to debate the negative implications?

What exactly is the nature of the forms of contact, what types of non humans have been identified, what is their origin, their perceived and stated agenda for contact with us, where did they come from, and what are they from our perspective? I would think these basic questions that would need to be answered.

Is it possible to distinguish friend from foe? I would hope there would be such a discussion, but I don't expect that. To not consider the existence of both negatively oriented, and positively oriented is a folly.

And what was it in particular that sparked Caroline Cory to make this documentary.

When a documentary is all positive, or all negative, I have to ask myself what was the objective of making it. Hopefully this is a balanced documentary that shows both sides of the coin. One where the discussion includes critical thought. I am much more likely to listen when there is a balance. There is a lot involved, including real people who may consider their DNA origins from a foot in each camp. Tricky.

We will have to wait and see.

There are two trailers. No. 2 trailer talks about where our DNA comes from. I will be interested to see how they came to their conclusion.

[we-R-one]

Yes the ‘gods’ walk amongst you. Recently I shared my Greek goddess identity Artemis as confirmed by well known Akashic reader, Kevin Ryerson and through my own further research. ‘We’ never left you, and like you, participated in the reincarnation wheel by playing specific roles along the way as part of ‘the game’. We look and think like you, so consider us to be a form of consciousness and Avatar inhabiting the shell of a human body. Planet Earth is a working ‘Experiment’ in more ways than one can even imagine and I suspect as time passes, this truth will become more clear to all.

Obviously I’m not the only E.T. in the room, so seriously consider who you’re really standing next to, lmao! Can you handle the truth? Don’t freak out, as this is where it starts getting interesting!

Looks like an intriguing documentary and everyone will have their own interpretation of the situation so I'll watch with interest.

[findingneo]

Hi We-R-one.

Who we are, depends on our perspective and perception of ourselves at that particular moment in time. That can change.
I think our perspective also depends on what mortal traits we came in with, each time around. We can remember what we experience, but we only try and decipher what we think we were, with the information we think we have, our discernment and our personality traits, and probably other stuff I have not mentioned or thought of.

Apparently the Conquistadors were greeted by the Inca's at first, as "Gods". That would be quite a typical expectation from a primitive civilization who had encountered what was perceived as an apparently superior race of humanoid beings. I think to a certain extent, we are the "primitive" people in this scenario, once again.

When it comes to being highly spiritual, I don't expect anyone would need to nor would they, broadcast it. The ego would have been placed aside to be that. For a race to call themselves "Gods" or to accept that label, my mind would go back to references to what actually transpired all the times in our own history.

Lots of things can influence our thoughts. And not all self appointed Shamans are actually receiving the truth, or sharing the truth. It can all just muddy the waters.

Not freaking out, as that is not new news to me.

Yes, it should be interesting to see the documentary, providing it is not slanted in favor of a particular message that the maker of it wants to push, and it is balanced.

[we-R-one]

Hi We-R-one.

Who we are, depends on our perspective and perception of ourselves at that particular moment in time. That can change.

Yes, but you will find when you know who you've been, you will see parts of yourself in each of your core identities and you will also see character traits that remain the same no matter how many years have passed. This can only be observed if you have lives that have been documented. However there's no reason to believe it would be any different for anyone else regardless of whether their lives were documented or not, it's just how it is. You have specific past life identities, no secret there and nothing to be ashamed of or hide. In time biometrics will likely be used to identify individuals as you have an energy signature which is why your bone structure will look the same from one incarnation to the next. The Sherrie Lea Laird/Marilyn Monroe case is the perfect example. Biometrics is already being used by the FBI. I've had my face measured which is one of many reasons why I'm confident in my identities. Studying reincarnation cases will emphasize my point of view as it’s based on what the research shows.


Apparently the Conquistadors were greeted by the Inca's at first, as "Gods". That would be quite a typical expectation from a primitive civilization who had encountered what was perceived as an apparently superior race of humanoid beings. I think to a certain extent, we are the "primitive" people in this scenario, once again.

There are currently many ‘gods’ on planet Earth; this is what people were called who came from the sky and that is what is meant by 'gods' little g not capital G. I wouldn't put all of us in the same basket as being primitive. I think you have people of varying levels of soul growth inhabiting this planet. It's how 'the game' works. Again, my opinion is based on what the research shows, that being cases involving NDE's, past life regression and past life studies.


When it comes to being highly spiritual, I don't expect anyone would need to nor would they, broadcast it. The ego would have been placed aside to be that. For a race to call themselves "Gods" or to accept that label, my mind would go back to references to what actually transpired all the times in our own history.

Please let go of the 3D belief system that sharing one’s identity shows lack of ‘being highly spiritual. I see people repeat this false meme over and over again and it's disheartening. If the collective as a whole finally got to the point of realizing reincarnation is true and E.T.'s are and have been walking this planet for eons then maybe I could see the point, but we're a looong way from that...The only way around it is to discuss fully and openly so more are comfortable with the concept. My point in sharing is to validate the content of recent posts including yours in regards to E.T.'s walking the Earth today, By stepping forward and openly sharing what I’ve uncovered I put a face with the name and the concept and a truth that is still undiscovered by many. The more of us who come forward, the more comfortable the idea becomes a part of the collective. So seriously, stop shaming the one's coming forward. Besides...there's no difference in what I'm doing compared to what the people are suggesting in this new documentary is there? I don't walk in fear which is why I'm willing to share. Besides...I wouldn't be Artemis if I did now would I? lol

*Artemis "Goddess of Light" had the divine duty of illuminating the darkness. Artemis was often depicted carrying a candle or torch, lighting the way for others, leading them through territories yet uncharted.

...and maybe this is why few currently have yet to see my point of view.....




Lots of things can influence our thoughts. And not all self appointed Shamans are actually receiving the truth, or sharing the truth. It can all just muddy the waters.

To the best of my knowledge Kevin is not a shawman, so I wouldn’t categorize him as such. He’s well known in the field, even served on the board of the Edgar Cayce Foundation for many years, so credibility is no issue in regards to his skill set and accuracy, do research him.

Here's the deal, and I speak from going through the experience several times, not from regurgitated information. You can tell if you’re being given a proper identification by how the information pertaining to you is obtained and in what order and based on the fact the person doing the reading knows nothing about you. You don’t just believe what you’re told you research it! You know yourself best so you will know if the information is correct. You will also notice parallels between your core incarnations once you research them. It's a combination of many factors that affirms you are being given correct information not just one thing. To the viewer this is difficult to understand and to the experiencer, impossible to articulate. An individual must go through the process themselves to fully appreciate the viewpoint. So while your above statement at times may be true, a blanket statement cannot be used for all.


Not freaking out, as that is not new news to me.

I wasn't directing the comment to you, it was a general statement as I know there are many who would freak out at the idea, because the topic in general isn't discussed openly to the masses which is why more people like myself need to come forward. I was merely trying to maintain a sense of humor about the concept.

[findingneo]

Not shaming we-R-one, yes, familiar with past life regression and the ET phenomenon, and you can't tell if the information is fact even if the person knows nothing about you. And yes I still have problems with anyone calling themselves a "god" with a little "g" (no offence), but they are not gods to me. I don't worship them. But each to their own. :dance:

[Raven]

trailers didn't work for me - when I clicked on them they both just went black

[findingneo]

Sorry Raven. Must not be accessible to your part of the world yet.:(

[Kindred]

NOTE: They've ALWAYS been here.
(OP: (A.K.A "GODS AMONG US: THE SCIENCE OF CONTACT"))

Why do we humans keep ignoring our own Divine Creativity???!!!
(KJ Bible)
"Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?"

WE are the Creators of our Own Reality... Most just don't know or accept this fact.

Humanity has NEVER been 'Alone'. Certainly, the ptw want you to Think there's 'no one else', except in vague references to 'potential life', and we see more and more 'suggestions' that there are 'others out there'. It's hard to gauge what the actual percentage of people who Know that Earth has been visited, and IS being visited on a regular basis. Many withhold stating their beliefs or understandings about ET's so as not to be considered delusional. (I'm NOT one of them... I KNOW Earth is Surrounded by 'non-locals' - "extra-planetarians" as per Thiaoouba Prophecy) Moreover, ALL of the human races currently on planet Came From Somewhere Else, or developed from those that migrated here.
A compilation of 'visitors' by Col. Wendel Stevens: http://www.galactic-server.net/linkmap.html

I'm Not waiting for disclosure... I speak of our star brethren at every opportunity because I Don't Care What People Think Of Me... I will Always Speak My Truth.

It's a shame that those in power chose to associate themselves with some rather negative off-worlders... (which, fortunately, are the minority). They were warned of them, but chose to ignore those warnings, to all of humanities detriment. Now, We as Individuals and as a Species need to take the necessary steps to correct this situation by Living In Love for ALL the creatures of Earth.
We are here to Heal the wounds that have been perpetrated and to Create a New World of Unity, Peace and Love.

In Unity, Peace and Love

[we-R-one]

Not shaming we-R-one, yes, familiar with past life regression and the ET phenomenon, and you can't tell if the information is fact even if the person knows nothing about you.

Bolding done by me......Really? Are you saying a person has no ability to discern if the information given about them is true? Who do you suggest should be given authority to confirm whether information about yourself is true or not? When you are your own sovereign, there is no need to rely on another. If you utilize the assistance of someone in the field who knows what they're doing such as Kevin Ryerson, you can tell if the information is fact. You viewpoint is merely a reflection of your inexperience on the subject and/or you haven't had the opportunity to work with an experienced Akashic reader. Totally understandable and why I share as how would one know until they've been put in front of the right people?

There's a difference between being familiar and actually studying cases. When you study case, after case, after case, you begin to notice patterns. And when cases are being explored properly you will see the same type of patterns cropping up from one case to the next. These are known as 'objectives' and help determine whether one has a compelling case. Studying the methodology of serious researchers is how you learn what to look for and builds confidence that proper identifications are being made. Also, I found my past life astrological chart offered affirmations to information I was given and what my intuition could feel.


And yes I still have problems with anyone calling themselves a "god" with a little "g" (no offence), but they are not gods to me. I don't worship them. But each to their own. :dance:

'gods' were what they were called back then by the natives and how they were referred to in ancient texts and writings. You kept writing Gods with a big 'G' and I just wanted to be clear the reference was incorrect. No one is asking you to worship them and if you think that's what I'm implying you are taking my words out of context.

[Bubu]

"gods" in this context is alien. I dont see much difference though between gods and natives. But what good will it bring if gods is among natives. or discuss this things? will it make life a little better for everyone. Is there a purpose to this classifying other than classifying or dividing.

[findingneo]

When I say "I am familiar" we-R-one, I mean, I am a Past Life Regression Facilitator. I also do CE5's where I get responses from what would be regarded as craft. I also research and read, talk to experts in a variety of fields.

So yes, familiar. I have nothing to prove to you and am over this converstion.

[findingneo]

By definition we-R-one, "gods' is something that is worshipped. If it is not worshipped, it is not the definition of a "god". I recognize there are aliens here, but anyone calling themselves a "god" or "goddess" I have no time for. That is just ego.

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=gods+definition&oq=gods+definition&gs_l=psy-ab.3..35i39k1j0j0i10k1l2.3484.6333.0.6832.11.11.0.0.0.0.312.1812.2-6j1.7.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..4.7.1804...0i67k1.0.ldamEYukTNg

[we-R-one]

"gods" in this context is alien. I dont see much difference though between gods and natives. But what good will it bring if gods is among natives. or discuss this things? will it make life a little better for everyone. Is there a purpose to this classifying other than classifying or dividing.
It was brought up for clarification and understanding the intentions of the writer, nothing more. There is no division in this conversation on my end, that is only in the minds of those who like to imply otherwise.


When I say "I am familiar" we-R-one, I mean, I am a Past Life Regression Facilitator. I also do CE5's where I get responses from what would be regarded as craft. I also research and read, talk to experts in a variety of fields.
So yes, familiar. I have nothing to prove to you and am over this converstion.
No one is asking you to ‘prove’ anything. I was merely sharing what I know and what I’ve learned from my experience as I could tell by your written words that it was an area you had not fully explored as of yet and your written words are all I have to go with. There is no judgment on my end and I realize most people haven't had the same opportunity I have to research their own lives in depth. The point of this forum is to engage in conversation and share, which is what I’m doing. So if you’re not interested in conversation maybe posting isn't for you.


By definition we-R-one, "gods' is something that is worshipped. If it is not worshipped, it is not the definition of a "god". I recognize there are aliens here, but anyone calling themselves a "god" or "goddess" I have no time for. That is just ego.
Artemis was a Greek ‘goddess’ that’s what she was called in ancient writings and that’s how people recognize her, so that’s why I state her as such in the recognized form. It has nothing to do with ego, that appears to be an issue on your end. It’s the same reason why I was clarifying ‘god’ to God as when you say God, people think you’re talking about ‘the one almighty’, where as ‘god’ is usually referencing an E.T. who comes from the sky. I’m merely pointing out the difference to make sure I’m understanding the intentions of your statements.

[Joe from the Carolinas]

I always figured ET wouldn't be so damned defensive. But that's just me.

[we-R-one]

Well E.T. isn't defensive, it's more like E.T. is articulate and detailed, and tries to remain as factual as possible so the message is clear to the viewer. The Avalon staff is very familiar with my research and writing style and understands my intentions.