Trump's Executive Order on Social Media Censorship
Printable View
Trump's Executive Order on Social Media Censorship
Trump Launches NUCLEAR Option Over Social Media Censorship Of Conservatives, Targets Section 230
Trump signs executive order regarding social media
Trump mentions:
Section 230
Monopoly in communication
Changes in legislation
and perhaps lawsuits
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sectio...ns_Decency_Act
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
Here's the leaked Executive Order. (I've not yet checked if this is identical to the one just signed.)
~~~
https://newstarget.com/Files/EO-Prev...Censorship.pdf
Leaked . . . ?
I don't like the the orange clown that feels the need to do solarium 24/7 a bit, but he's certainly spicying things up, particularly if he stays true to what he answered in the last question. The question was about what he thinks regarding the china-us trade deal, but he instead replied by implying that he'll officialy accuse china for the covid1984 spread worldwide. Tomorrow!!!
Stefan Molyneux Title of The Video was made couple hours BEFORE it was "official" ... I think he changed the title but NOT the Thumbnail Preview Picture.
And all Trump haters who love to misrepresent him 24/7 ... is not my worry as I am not responsible for their quality of thinking that is their Karma. Those who (blindly) believe copied lies & smears are hopeless anyway. As I am Dutch am beyond Deep State Republicrats & Deep State Demopublcians ... I supported Ron Paul for a long long time even before he was Republican ... Being Libertarian is his true passion.
This did happen last year, and if the draft EO passes as written, it looks like it will reopen again.
There's been many mentions of IBOR (Internet Bill of Rights) by Q. It's probably a healthy discussion to have, the idea and concept of an Internet Bill of Rights.Quote:
In May of 2019, the White House Office of Digital Strategy created a Tech Bias Reporting tool to allow Americans to report incidents of online censorship. In just weeks, the White House received over 16,000 complaints of online platforms censoring or otherwise taking action against users based on their political viewpoints. The White House Office of Digital Strategy shall reestablish the White House Tech Bias Reporting Tool to collect complaints of online censorship and other potentially unfair or deceptive acts or practices by online platforms and shall submit complaints received to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
Should such a thing exist?
If so, what ought to be included in it, excluded from it?
Who would be the governing body?
How would it be applied?
Could IBOR even be enforced?
Would IBOR bring balance to an out-of-balance situation?
...
It'll be interesting to see if this idea starts to come more and more to the forefront of public conversation?
While many media are presenting today's actions by President Trump as a reaction to the recent Twitter fact-check. It seems to me that this has been in works for at least a year, probably longer?
Social Media Companies PANICKING Over Trump Executive Order And Its Hilarious:
¤=[Post Update]=¤
Stefan Molyneux Title of The Video was made couple hours BEFORE it was "official" ... I think he changed the title but NOT the Thumbnail Preview Picture.
'The Five' spar over Trump's social media 'crackdown'
Is Facebook censoring conservative voices? Zuckerberg weighs in
Yes, it was made available to, it seems, select individuals - one example below:
I have to say, this has made my day.
That is all.
As long as the maths are not in favor of the people who would call this tyranny, it makes mine too.
But, let's not be media political. The situation is more vast of mind and human soul than that.
We are not a bunch of "media" union hacks sticking up for something the union stands for. Oh yea, free speech etc, Assange was never a cabal asset etc.
Keep it real, and keep it focused on what's going to get us out of this. The truth and the true energy. There is nothing retrospectively wise or academic about stepping forwards. It takes a simple faith. It's for others, at their leasure, to write it all up as the entertainment bollox some might still want to consume.
Oh, damn, I mentioned Assange's origins, bet I never see a thanks from Tintin ;)
Fair point Norman,
but do you think Assange being tortured is a lie to decieve us?
I don't get your reference there.
On Assange, that's fairly simple. He only flipped late in the game when he'd been left out to rot.
I'm sure Trump and the team wish him well though. His biggest problem is himself, he's still programmed to talk the underdog talk they put into him as a kid.
Jeeze, Julian, get off the political correctness, put your hand on your heart, and join the great awakening. We love you, but stop it with the bollox.
Extradition out of the uk is a GOOD thing, for crisakes, what's his problem.
At the end of the day, until I really feel a different energy signature from Assange and his string of Rothschild lawyers, I really dont trust the guy to not be a total sh*t at the wrong moment. I doubt Trump feels any different.
There ya go folks, that's probaby me booted out of avalon.
He is Being tortured though.
Read Craig murray's blog, and you'll get real insight into just how bad it is.
Murray is currently under threat of jail time, because he had the temerity to document, and stand up for Alex Salmond, the face of real Scotttish independence.
The establishment is raging due to Salmond being found not guuilty of all charges of sexual misconduct (by a jury including 9 women from anti independence Edinburgh), so they have decided to go after Murray, as a face saving excercise.
I've chatted to Murray, who also has been denied access to his friend Assange, as have his lawyers, and what he has to say about his treatment is, qiute frankly, heartbreaking.
At the start of the opening of his trial, he couldn't even recall his place of birth, or his date of birth.
The implications of Assange's treatment, for all of us, are clear to see.
I respect your viewpoint though.
Tortured for what ! ?
His confusion about what side he's on ? ffs man, if he doesn't know now he's rotten to the core. Trump asked him politely to join the good side. he said f^ck off.
After that, what I am or anyone to think ?.
HAHA, I see the thanks have all dried up. hahahaha
I guess we're at the point where the cematorium says bless this soul :)
Nope. It's just that this thread started of reporting on some very important development on the US political chessboard and it somehow ended up being about J.Assange.
Perhaps if you take it to the appropriate thread you might have better luck. With a quick search I could find 96 threads about assange.