Printable View
tonight's show
1am - 5am ET
10pm - 2am PT
Space Exploration & Innovation
Thu 03-01
Astrophysicist and director of the Hayden Planetarium, Neil deGrasse Tyson, will discuss how we can get back on track to become a space-faring society once again, and what we stand to lose if NASA doesn't regain its ground as a force for innovation.
First Hour: Investment advisor Catherine Austin Fitts joins George in the studio for an update on economic news.
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/
Here is a link to Dr. Tyson home page
http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/tyson/
Just to lighten things up here's a very funny and interesting interview
I enjoyed that.:clap2:
Too many lawyers
"Good men are unwilling to rule, either for money's sake or for honour.... So they must be forced to consent under threat of penalty.... The heaviest penalty for declining to rule is to be ruled by someone inferior to yourself. That is the fear, I believe, that makes decent people accept power...."
Jan 7, 2012
I did first year law twice. In the 60s everyone talked about justice. In the 80s everyone talked about money.
In the 60s I had an 8 month old baby and I was working full time as a federal adjudicator and I was one of two women in my class. We were called on every night we went to class, the guys could slide when needed. Everyone knew our names first. I could not handle it. I had bleeding ulcers.
In the 80s, I was appalled. I went to a charity high flalutin dinner and was seated next to Rose Bird who was at that moment Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court. I told her I had already figured out that the people I wanted to represent could not afford me and the people I loathed would hire me in a minute. She told me that if she had to do it again she wouldn't. I figured that was the best insight I had been given and did not go back after the first year.
NICE! Went right on my Facebook Group Page... Thanks for posting!
Chris Martenson is so disgusted with Tyson, he can hardly find words. :)
What he's stressing in this 25 minute video may seem a little nuanced to some, but it's extremely important and is directly linked to media-driven issues such as covid, the vaxx, the Wuhan lab leak, UFOs, "global warming", and much more.
https://projectavalon.net/Of_course_...ists_agree.jpg
Neil deGrasse Tyson Disgraces Science
https://youtube.com/watch?v=hEgS5lSZ61s
I gave up on Tyson years ago when he dismissed "all" people that had a UFO sighting as being unstable. Making such a broad stereotype claim told me that he lacked the ability to critically think and/or was just another useful idiot.
I was dumbfounded a few years ago when he dismissed extra terrestrial life...sooooo disappointed in him.
- William Shatner (93) Has Questions for Neil deGrasse Tyson (65):
What is the value of curiosity? Neil deGrasse Tyson sits down with William Shatner to explore the nature of spacetime, Star Trek, human curiosity, loneliness, and more. How would warp drive work?
What is William Shanter's favorite Star Trek episode? Learn about the question Stephen Hawking had for Bill and the secret power of science fiction. Bill talks about what it was like to watch Neil Armstrong walk on the moon after Star Trek was originally canceled. We discuss Artemis, our return to the moon, and how we can create a base there. Will there be enough water on the moon for people to use?
Neil breaks down how water can be used for fuel and how humans have harnessed the power of physics. We discuss Bill’s new documentary You Can Call Me Bill and some philosophical points about science. Are electrons lonely? We explore the difference between being lonely and being alone and the nature of curiosity. Is human curiosity a double-edged sword? Is there anything left on Bill’s bucket list? Plus, Bill asks if living beings like mycelia could be analogs for the universe's structure.
Why is it spacetime and not space and time separately? What is the vacuum of space made of? Discover virtual particles and how the fabric of spacetime may be a web made of wormholes. We break down dark energy and dark matter, and why their names may be misleading. To end, we discuss old age and wisdom: do they go together?
Tyson is a POS.
He has blood on his hands for pushing the lie about CV19 and supporting the poison injections. Go back and find his interview with Steve Colbert in early 2020. I posted it once or twice on a CV19/vax thread, but you can find it on the “internets”. Take note of his tie. Up close you see a rocket with a long pointed needle-like protrusion, but as the camera pulls back the “rocket” takes on the distinct appearance of a syringe with a long needle.
Among other things, in the predictive programming interview he tells Colbert that CV19 is a test to see if people will do what the experts say. Colbert asks or exclaims words to the effect, “oh, we are the guinea pigs?” To which Tyson replies by grinning and shrugging his shoulders in an affirmative manner.
Disgusting.
"I'm not interested in medical pedigree. I'm interested in medical consensus and scientific consensus...The individual scientist does not matter."
There cannot be a consensus on the importance of the distribution of steel down the Twin Towers if engineers and scientists don't talk about it for Two Decades.
He's absolutely wrong about this. (And many have pointed that out.)Quote:
Posted by psikeyhackr
The history of science is filled with brilliant mavericks (Archimedes, Newton, Copernicus, Galileo, Maxwell, Tesla, Einstein, and many hundreds more) whose individual work has moved everything forwards in major steps.
Consensus is a bureaucratic form of affirmation, not scientific.
When science was real (and it began to corrupt perceptible from the 1960s until by-now science is essentially dead among professional researchers), it was validated in practice - not by committee; and by the best relevant scientists using earlier findings and theories in their own work - not by counting heads.
See Science as a Process, by David L Hull (University of Chicago Press, 1988)
There is a huge graveyard of (old) paradigm (medical) consensus and scientific consensus, some of it were corrupted ones ... most are incomplete, having no access to the bigger picture or better insights or different (overlooked) perceptions ... How many inventions of the past made by highly gifted individuals were originally deemed "impossible" until a new generation of people used it, and it became eventually "common good".Quote:
Posted by psikeyhackr
cheers,
- "consensus" of any kind can by corrupted by those who have their own agenda to defend/protect.
- "consensus" & the dark side of corrupt political collectivism go often hand in hand!
John 🦜🦋🌳
- "Bill Maher vs "Wannebe Woke" >> Neil deGrasse Tyson & Loses the Elon Musk To Mars Debate:
Patrick Bet-David and the crew react to Bill Maher's debate with Neil deGrasse Tyson on scientific integrity, gender debates, and Elon Musk's vision for Mars. They critique Tyson's statements and explore the divide between academia and entrepreneurship.
"Tyson lost my respect a couple of years ago, around 2021 when he started jumping through hoops to deny that Wuhan was a logical source of Covid. He's only gotten worse since".
- @asajayunknown6290 quote:
"FINALLY... This clown actor is being exposed for who is truly is".
- @poppygoldensun quote:
"NDT is only interested in how he looks to his friends at the cocktail party. He is also a perfect example of intellectual honesty"
- @nickgeorgiou7770 quote: