Another video which if legit is another smoking gun that leads you to believe it was an inside judge. As always you be the judge....
¤=[Post Update]=¤
Forwhat ever reason it's not uploading and I'm sorry about that.
Printable View
Another video which if legit is another smoking gun that leads you to believe it was an inside judge. As always you be the judge....
¤=[Post Update]=¤
Forwhat ever reason it's not uploading and I'm sorry about that.
It's been removed from YT I think.
makes me want to see it more when they remove things like that
If i may interject with this video, being the other one has been removed.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=MNdXjp8NEEY
First of all, my shift key is broken so if my punctuation looks weird, that's why.
I heard someone mention the holograph theory almost immediately after 9-11. I can buy that it was a hologram rather than planes and that the building collapses were controlled demolitions -in fact the latter part seems almost certain. The only complication is that they had a list of passengers who allegedly died in these crashes. Were these all faked then -question mark, lol. It's possible I suppose, but that would have involved creating a rather complex script, complete with fake grieving relatives and so forth. Since even some of the 9-11 surviving relatives turned into Truthers, it seems hard to believe they were all hired actors.
I like the theory, as when the guest in the video -didn't catch his name- says that there was no way these planes could have hit the center of the WTCs, especially flown by inexperienced pilots, it makes perfect sense. These were narrow buildings, and it would have been all too easy for one or both of them to miss. However, if this was the case, has anyone come up with a theory about the alleged dead passengers...
someone posted a vid here, can't remember who / when, which said that no friends or families had turned up at the airports to meet their relatives / friends of the people of the flights...?
other than that, i watched 'september clues' (recommended, can watch it on YT)... i thought i'd seen / read it all on this topic but that doc *totally* blew me away.... just to add insult to injury there's this lovely item, complete with nose poking out the other side of the building (for those that know about that little physics anomaly):
http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enha...41958464-7.jpg
This is the YouTube video, Viking's post on Facebook:
Trying to wake up others, 9/11 is imo still a very good one to start with.
And especially building 7 is a good one. No plane and the building came
down free fall speed.
Since 9/11 a lot of things changed. A lot of things to work towards
'their' new world order, but the event has been more important
to wake people up and so the whole event isn't helping 'them',
but helping to rise the global human consciousness.
That vid is part of this doc, worth watching if u get time... love to know thoughts on it
That makes so much more sense now! It explains alot actually, like the lack of all those vital things you need to when a plan crash: wreckage, bodies, blood, you know....evidence of an actual crash :rolleyes: The only thing we have surviving from the planes that crashed into the towers was a magical passport by one of the *cough*hi-jackers*cough* that made it down to the ground :wacko:
If I'm remembering correctly none of the bodies have ever been returned to the families right?
This theory makes so much sense now! Wow!
This is one of the videos i actually saw and knew that it was an inside job. Of course they took it off. People are waking up to their schemes. I saw the one with the Pentagon missile that the marine said was coming in and Cheney was there and went into a bunker and didn't tell them to fire on it or intercept it. Shame this same marine is dead now. He's as dead as the marine who reported that the live nukes were being transported by plane headed out of the country and they caught the cargo in Louisiana. He is dead from a "car accident" two months after he reported it.
Let's get em. WAR CRIMES in a court trial will stop them from terrorizing the world and put them on the defense of their deeds and keep the world safe. WHERE IS THE HAGUE WHEN YOU NEED IT?
God I'm weary of all they get away with. And as they say in Revelation the souls cry out for justice and God delivered justice for them.
Hang on to your patootie, the road's about to get real bumpy on the way to prosecution of these 4th reich wolves in American clothing.
See them in cuffs people, see them in cuffs before a world court and the gavel coming down for their sentencing. They're already talking about public hangings of bankers in EUK.
Let it be so.
There was no plane that hit the Pentagon or building 7. I do believe that 2 planes hit the WTC towers and these planes were radio controlled military planes. The civillian planes were flying later that day and were reporting back to base through automated ACAR system. Peter Eyre said this at 1.31 on 18th July "Whistleblower radio"
Just because someone talks a good game or shows how video changes when switched between formats does not mean planes did not hit the towers. Do all aspects add-up on 9/11....no.
An engine was found on the street away from WTCs as well as other major parts.
http://911review.org/_webimages/wtc/5248.JPG
http://911review.org/_webimages/wtc/ny_wtc_588p-th.JPG
http://911review.org/_webimages/wtc/tre_engine.jpg
http://911review.org/_webimages/wtc/pp0.JPG
http://911review.org/_webimages/wtc/tire1.JPG
Rich
does that pic above look like a Boeing engine ??
its tiny...
http://www.staero.aero/images/servic...pi_cmyk(3).jpg
besides, jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel - end of!!
oh my god... I'm getting sucked in again, must... resist... :o
Yes, and a plane engine was found on the ground outside the Pentagon as well. Problem was, it was entirely the wrong kind of engine for the plane that supposedly flew into the Pentagon.
Yes it does fit. I've looked-up the parts and counted the blades, it is a RB-211 engine from a 757.
I probably should have put-up more info. The turbine is from the rear of the engine, it has been awhile since I counted the blades but it is one of the last three in the engine.
Rich
Dance,
I do believe the WTC's were demo'd, but planes did hit. I also believe the plane that was shot down over Shanksville was intended to impact WTC7 but the military did not follow protocol and did what was right.
Rich
Some discussion on the 737 versus 757 engines. A quote from the second link:
"They are all jet engine components (past and present) on the A-3 Skywarrior twin-turbojet airplane and on older versions of the 737. The USAF only has a few of the A-3s left in operation and what was formerly Hughes Aircraft, now Raytheon, has a fleet of them at Van Nuys, Calif. This type of turbojet engine has never been used on a Boeing 757, so the debate on "type of plane" can end there. This is a jet engine component with fan, not an auxiliary power unit (APU) as some have speculated or dropped into the conversation as disinformation."
http://rense.com/general63/hiding.htm
http://rense.com/general63/ident.htm
Rense is also full of it.....
This shows the RB211 engine in the 757 specification.
Didn't mean to have people waste so much time on the above link, but it's page three around the middle column.
Rich
P.S. Just so you know, I've been kicked out of both pro-official story and anti-official story chat rooms. Just ask for evidence to back up the claims. Then ask yourself, "Am I looking for truth?" or "Am I looking for any story that's anti-official story because I do not like the government?"
Look for truth. A friend that is an ex-Navy seal borrowed my 911 binder to show around. His neighbor saw the info and said we've lost the united stated. They found him dead the next day. If a revolution were to start are you willing to put a bullet through someone's head based on an unsubstantiated rumor?
I am indirectly responsible for that man killing himself, I had the WRONG engine information in that binder. This is very personal to me.
I´m 99.9% sure that 9/11 was an inside job.
However, I´m not sure about this CGI airplanes hypothesis.
Anyway, the best way to know is to contact any witnesses who may have actually seen these planes with their own eyes.
This forum has lots of members. I´m sure someone here might know someone who witnessed this incident, who may be able report if he/she saw any planes or not.
Raf.