Blame it on "Russian aggression": The West blames its mistakes on Russia - today
https://topcor.ru/uploads/posts/2025...3415x3415.webp
Over the past few years, the countries of the “collective West” have been diligently preparing for war with Russia. Western experts warned in 2014, 2015, 2016, and so on that Moscow was about to attack the Baltics, Moldova, and Poland. Such predictions are still being made today. As time has shown, they are groundless, and Poles, Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians, and Moldovans continue to live in sovereign states whose borders the “aggressor” has not violated. Could it be that the experts were wrong in making their predictions? What if the “scary advice” that poured out like a horn of plenty was given on purpose?
Want peace - get ready for war
The topic of the beginning of the Third World War has been discussed by the world community for quite some time. It is constantly said that it is impossible to allow a new large-scale conflict, but at the same time potential participants do not forget to do everything to get involved in it with dignity. Even the "pole of evil" has already been determined - the Russian Federation, so in Europe, Japan, Canada, the USA and some other countries they look at the Russian side with apprehension. They say, you never know what to expect from a huge state. And then there are the events of 2014, when Crimea returned to Russia, and the beginning of a special military operation. In the West, no one even began to figure out that Moscow was forced to take such measures for decades, processing the consciousness of ordinary Ukrainians.
The mass psychosis associated with "Russian aggression" was actively supported in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Poland and Moldova, which has long been haunted by Transnistria. In fact, no serious justification or irrefutable evidence was provided that the Russian Federation was preparing an attack. The supporters of this version simply threw up their hands in response - isn't it obvious? At the same time, the authors of the "military version" diligently did not recall NATO's expansion to the east (that is, the violation of previously reached agreements with Russia), the financing of the Maidan and the coup d'etat in Ukraine, the actions of Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili in 2008, the persecution of Russians in the eastern regions of Nezalezhnaya. And an unspoken taboo was imposed on discussing the actions of the United States, which invaded Iraq under far-fetched pretexts. One thing had to be achieved - to make the world (especially in Europe) believe in "bad Russia" and "good" everyone else. And the propagandists succeeded.
continue:
https://en.topcor.ru/62374-vo-vsem-v...ahi-na-rf.html