https://x.com/NicHulscher/status/1978162839492739390
Printable View
Operation Warp Speed Was Treason and an Act of War: We Must Demand Unconditional Surrender
Dr. Joseph Sansone
Oct 18, 2025
https://substack.com/home/post/p-176516395
(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)
"Operation Warp Speed was treason, an act of war against these United States, and the world at large. It involved an international conspiracy carried out by the international criminal class that directs governments behind the scenes. It involved all three branches of the federal government, two presidential administrations, and all 50 state governments, as well as local governments. It involved both political parties. It continues.
The MRNA nanoparticle injections are biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. Most people you know will have a shortened lifespan because of these injections. Civilians were and are targeted directly through injections and indirectly through shedding.
Therefore, we must demand unconditional surrender.
Unconditional surrender means no longer supporting Limited Hangouts and half measures.
Let’s be very clear. At the federal level. President Trump could issue an executive order immediately stopping MRNA nanoparticle injections. The President has the authority to respond to a biological warfare attack on the civilian population, even if carried out by the pharmaceutical industry in collusion with the government.
Instead, the White House is putting out a very suspicious document that Trump got his COVID 19 booster and Trump recently praised Pfizer’s handling of COVID at the White House. Billionaires are not naïve. Trump would have to be the dumbest person on the planet to get a COVID injection after all the evidence presented to him. My guess is that Trump is firming up plausible deniability that he did not know MRNA was a bioweapon, just in case. Of course he knew. This also may fulfill a grandiose narcissistic need to humiliate his supporters.
Attorney General Pam Bondi could seek an injunction under 18 USC 175 CH 10 Biological Weapons to prohibit MRNA because they are bioweapons and violate that law and the Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989, and the Biological Weapons Convention. The specific language in 18 USC 175 CH 10 Biological Weapons was taken from the Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989, which was the U.S. domestic implementation legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention.
As James Roguski pointed out FDA Commissioner Marty Makary could revoke the biologics licenses:
“Title 21, Chapter I, Subchapter F, Part 601, Subpart A, §601.5 Revocation of license.
(b)(1) The Commissioner shall notify the licensed manufacturer of the intention to revoke the biologics license, setting forth the grounds for, and offering an opportunity for a hearing on the proposed revocation if the Commissioner finds any of the following:
(v) The establishment or the manufacturing methods have been so changed as to require a new showing that the establishment or product meets the requirements established in this chapter in order to protect the public health.
(vi) The licensed product is not safe and effective for all of its intended uses or is misbranded with respect to any such use.”
Roguski wrote this follow up article on this topic
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary clearly can revoke the biologics licenses based on the MRNA injections not being safe and effective.
Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert Kennedy Jr. could force Makary to do this if he wanted to. The HHS Secretary has the power to direct the FDA commissioner.
HHS Secretary Kathleeen Sebelius took the rare step in 2011:
“On December 7, 2011, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius overruled the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) decision to make Plan B One-Step emergency contraception available over the counter for all women.”
This required children under 17 years of age to get a prescription for contraceptives.
In 2020, HHS Secretary Alex Azar overruled FDA officials to revoke the agency’s ability to evaluate the quality of laboratory-developed tests, including those for COVID-19.
In March 2025, Secretary Kennedy directed the acting FDA commissioner to explore rulemaking aimed at eliminating the GRAS self-affirmation pathway. This mechanism allowed manufacturers to independently determine that food ingredients were safe for consumption without notifying or seeking approval from the FDA.
Secretary Kennedy could also push for a pharmaceutical recall, which is voluntary, and arguably mandate the recall if necessary. § 7.40 Recall policy
Recall is an effective method of removing or correcting consumer products that are in violation of laws administered by the Food and Drug Administration. Recall is a voluntary action that takes place because manufacturers and distributors carry out their responsibility to protect the public health and well-being from products that present a risk of injury or gross deception or are otherwise defective. This section and §§ 7.41 through 7.59 recognize the voluntary nature of recall by providing guidance so that responsible firms may effectively discharge their recall responsibilities. These sections also recognize that recall is an alternative to a Food and Drug Administration-initiated court action for removing or correcting violative, distributed products by setting forth specific recall procedures for the Food and Drug Administration to monitor recalls and assess the adequacy of a firm’s efforts in recall.
A voluntary recall would provide cover for the criminals as the shots would be off the market and could make the issue moot and likely take some of the wind out of the sails for any attempt to set up for future prosecutions. At least that would be the intention. Some would argue that a recall is the most likely scenario.
If so, this is because it is a limited hangout. A Limited Hangout is when they admit the problem and try to control the narrative to cover their tracks. Although I am not sold that they are actually doing this. In July and August the FDA approved Spikevax and Comirnaty:
“As of July 9, 2025, there is now an approved COVID-19 vaccine for use in certain individuals in the age group that is the target of the EUA.
Specifically, on July 9, 2025, FDA approved Spikevax (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) (2024-2025 Formula) for use in individuals who are 65 years of age and older, or 6 months through 64 years of age with at least one underlying condition that puts them at high risk for severe outcomes from COVID-19.
In addition, on August 27, 2025, FDA approved Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) (2025-2026 Formula) for use in individuals who are 65 years of age and older, or 5 years through 64 years of age with at least one underlying condition that puts them at high risk for severe outcomes from COVID-19.”
RFK Jr. has been running a Limited Hangout at HHS. The Secretary in his official capacity admitted that the MRNA injections have no prophylactic effect and that the risks outweigh the benefits. Then he promoted placebo controlled blind studies moving forward as if he did not know the MRNA injections were a weapon. Keeping the MRNA injections on the market after admitting there was no prophylactic effect and the risks outweigh the benefits, at a minimum, demonstrated criminal intent from that moment forward, which is why I filed his statement as a supplemental authority in my case.
All 50 state governors could stop the shots by enforcing their state bioweapon or weapon of mass destruction laws. In Florida I have been litigating for over a year and a half to try to get DeSantis and the Attorney General to stop the MRNA injections because they violate Fla. Stat. 790.166. Recently, Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo speaking in his official capacity stated that COVID MRNA shots were a ‘poison’ which happens to be in the legal definition of 790.166.
Any local prosecutor and sheriff can get together and enforce existing laws. In fact, Dr. Francis Boyle pointed this out in his book Resisting Medical Tyranny. Dr. Boyle is the law professor that wrote the Biological Weapons and Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989. Dr. Boyle provided an affidavit, for my writ of mandamus and my current case, stating that MRNA nanoparticle injections violated 18 USC 175 CH Biological Weapons and Fla. Stat. 790.166.
To his credit, Dr. Boyle pointed out that the COVID-19 injections were bioweapons in late 2020 before they were even distributed. Part of his argument was that COVID was a synthetic bioweapon created through illegal gain of function research and that since the virus was in the vaccine that in effect made the vaccine a bioweapon too.
I also got affidavits from Ana Mihalcea, M.D., PhD; Rima Laibow, M.D.; Karen Kingston; Andrew Zywiec, M.D.; Marivic Villa, M.D., and Avery Brinkley, M.D.. Dr. Ben Marble, M.D., and Dr. Paul Alexander, PhD.
A recent peer reviewed journal article by Zywiec et al published in the American Journal of Physicians and Surgeons called COVID 19 Harms and Damages a Non Exhaustive Conclusion stated that both the ‘virus’ and the ’vaccine’ violated the biological weapons convention.
Amazingly, after Lisa Miron AKA Lawyer Lisa and I presented it, the Alliance of Indigenous Nations held hearings and recently became the first governing body and judicial authority in the world to issue an ORDER declaring MRNA nanoparticle injections biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. Hopefully, more tribal nations will sign on to this.
The path to victory here is to get a jurisdiction somewhere in the United States or a Western industrialized country, to recognize that the MRNA nanoparticle injections are already illegal biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. That will cause the house of cards to collapse and lead to eventual prosecutions. That is the end game that people need to focus on.
Instead, we have bills being promoted to prohibit MRNA that don’t mention that the shots are already illegal. This too gives cover to the criminals. This is why my bill the Sansone MRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act seeks to prohibit MRNA injections because they are already illegal biological and technological weapons of mass destruction in violation of existing laws. It also creates a criminal and civil liability for non-enforcement. I have a downloadable version for all 50 states plus a federal version as well as a version for 55 countries. So far, this bill has only been introduced in Minnesota by Representative Shane Mekeland.
Of course, no bill is necessary if somebody somewhere would just enforce the law…
The idea is maximum pressure.
There are also other proposed bills that are trying to chip away at the issue and make incremental gains. That is not the approach for this moment and time in history. Mandates are a psychological operation. When we debate mandates there is an embedded hypnotic command is that it is okay to target us with biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. There is no choice involved. That would be like saying you have a choice to drink coffee that nobody told you was poisoned and the guy next to you can get sick and die from the smell (shedding).
The debate needs to be about whether the MRNA injections are bioweapons, then the discussion will center on who to prosecute and mandates won’t even be an issue. This is why there is such resistance to the fact that these injections are weapons. The focus needs to be on the end game, which is establishing that the MRNA nanoparticle injections are biological and technological weapons of mass destruction.
Once you understand that the MRNA injections are biological and technological weapons of mass destruction that have targeted the global civilian population, especially the civilian population in Western countries, it becomes clear that this is a war of extermination.
The MRNA nanoparticle injections must be recognized as biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. People need to continue to file cases. Either find a legal argument or create one. People need to push my bill or add it to existing bills. It is only two pages.
The Trump administration deliberately sends mixed messages to feed the cognitive dissonance induced denial. Psychologically this fills a need to alleviate the uncomfortable feeling of cognitive dissonance. There is also a psychological and sometimes monetary need to retain access to politicians and important influencers that causes pause for some individuals and organizations.
As you watch your friends and family members die over the next decade or two recognize that their hope resides in recognizing the bioweapon status of the MRNA injections and finding a way to mitigate the damages. Not admitting the problem will not save any lives and certainly will not lead to necessary prosecutions.
People of all religions, rich people, poor people, Republicans, Independents, and Democrats, white people, black people, and everyone in between, were targeted with biological and technological weapons of mass destruction.
It took about a minute to ignore the Constitution and the law and lock down the world. It should have taken about 10 seconds to stop the shots.
We must demand the Trump administration or any future administration’s Unconditional Surrender on this issue. Nothing less is acceptable.
********************
Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism. Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. "
related so copying here
Quote:
Posted by mountain_jim
Tucker Carlson
@TuckerCarlson
The people who created the Covid virus have never been punished. Dr. Andrew Huff knows them personally, which is why they’re trying to terrorize him into silence.
(0:00) Peter Daszak, USAID, and Predicting Pandemics
(8:49) The Moment Huff Realized His Company Was Doing Gain-Of-Function Research
(14:07) China’s Bioweapons Labs, Wuhan, and the CIA
(24:17) How to Transport and Collect Deadly Viruses From Around the World
(35:05) Is All Gain-Of-Function Research Bad?
(39:44) Big Pharma and the Government’s Covid Psyop
(50:53) How They Targeted Dr. Huff for Speaking Out
(1:00:35) Dr. Huff Being Mysteriously Followed
(1:10:16) What Actually Were the 2001 Anthrax Attacks?
(1:14:39) The Dangerous Network of Global Biolabs
(1:19:52) How Dr. Huff Caught the Spies Who Were Tailing Him
(1:25:00) Was Anyone Held Accountable for Terrorizing Dr. Huff?
(1:27:47) Did the CIA Ever Gather Any Valuable Intel From Wuhan?
(1:36:03) Was Covid Released on Purpose?
(1:39:07) Is There a Connection Between mRNA Vaccines and Cancer?
(1:40:47) Has Man Created Life?
(1:44:20) The Dangerous Combination of Nanotechnology and AI
(1:50:43) Why Did RFK Jr. Face Backlash for Saying This?
(1:54:13) How Do We Fix the Pharmaceutical Industry?
Includes paid partnerships.
Exclusive: California Medicaid Provider Pays Parents Hundreds of Dollars to Vaccinate Their Kids
by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
October 22, 2025
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...2s#btn-share-1
(The perfect adjunct to the elite's depopulation agenda...:sad:
Podcast and hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)
"An investigation by The Defender revealed that one of the largest Medicaid plans in the U.S. offers parents hundreds of dollars in gift cards when their children get certain vaccines. Critics say the program is undermining informed consent by turning important medical decisions into financial ones for low-income families.
One of the largest Medicaid health plans in the U.S. is paying low-income parents hundreds of dollars in gift cards to vaccinate their children, an investigation by The Defender found.
Inland Empire Health Plan (IEHP) — which serves about 1.6 million people in Southern California — gives parents a $200 gift card when their baby receives a flu shot and the rotavirus series of shots by age 1, according to its 2025 Medi-Cal Member Incentive FAQs sent to all of IEHP’s general practitioners, family practitioners and pediatricians.
IEHP also gives a $50 gift card when a 12- or 13-year-old receives the first dose of the HPV vaccine, and an additional $150 gift card if the pre-teen completes the two- or three-dose series by age 13.
Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) senior research scientist, said IEHP is undermining true informed consent.
“An incentivized parent choosing vaccination is not medical decision-making — it’s economic decision-making,” he said. “In the case of low-income Medicaid families, that incentive may look more like an undue influence.”
The full scope of the IEHP’s vaccination incentive program is unclear.
According to a 2024 FAQ memo sent to providers, IEHP gave families $25 gift cards when children completed various wellness checkups. The 2024 FAQ memo did not list specific vaccinations that needed to be completed at the wellness visits.
The 2025 FAQ memo didn’t mention rewards for wellness checkups.
Jablonowski said there are valid reasons why parents choose not to vaccinate their children. “That reasoning shouldn’t be conflated with monetary incentives.”
Researchers from the University of Maryland published a peer-reviewed study in June that found the HPV vaccine increases the risk of autonomic dysfunction, including postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), and menstrual irregularities in young women.
A 2024 peer-reviewed study by Dr. Jacob Puliyel and CHD’s Chief Scientific Officer Brian Hooker on the health risks linked to India’s rotavirus vaccine showed that U.S. rotavirus vaccines may pose similar risks.
GlaxoSmithKline, now GSK, manufactures the two-dose rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix, used in the U.S.
Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., makes the country’s three-dose rotavirus vaccine, RotaTeq.
Both rotavirus vaccines used in the U.S. list several possible adverse reactions, including intussusception, a serious condition that occurs when the intestine slides or telescopes into itself, obstructing the bowel and potentially leading to gangrene or death if untreated.
“Informed consent, with an eye on consequences, is at odds with incentivization programs that show no regard for individual consequences,” Jablonowski said.
Dr. Michelle Perro, a pediatrician in California, agreed. She called the use of gift cards to influence parental medical decisions “deeply troubling.”
“Health decisions must be based on education and the child’s best interest, not a financial reward,” Perro said. “This program should be suspended immediately to restore integrity and transparency to pediatric practice.”
Perro added that she doesn’t recommend routine flu shots or the rotavirus vaccine series for infants. “In my clinical experience and review of the data, the benefits are overstated while the risks, particularly to the developing immune and gastrointestinal systems, are under-acknowledged.”
IEHP launched in 1996 as California’s Medi-Cal provider for Riverside and San Bernardino counties. Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid program, provides free or low-cost health coverage for low-income individuals and families.
Though there are now other Medi-Cal providers in the area, IEHP is among the largest. IEHP also claims it is the country’s largest not-for-profit Medicare-Medicaid public health plan.
‘Medi-Cal has posters in every office … for getting these gift cards’
According to its 2025 FAQ memo, IEHP’s vaccination incentive program identifies qualifying members and notifies them that they could earn a gift card when they bring their baby or teen to their primary care provider to receive a complete set of vaccinations.
Roughly two weeks after IEHP receives proof that the baby or teen received the vaccinations, it mails the member a reward certificate with instructions for claiming the gift card online, via phone or by mail.
The FAQ sheet says members can choose from a “selection” of gift cards, but doesn’t specify store or brand names.
IEHP’s 2025 FAQ memo says the incentive program encourages patients “to complete needed immunizations and close gaps in care.”
The Defender is investigating whether other Medi-Cal providers offer similar incentives.
Robbin Clifford, a Medi-Cal member in Orange County, told The Defender she started noticing posters in clinic offices advertising gift cards in exchange for getting kids vaccinated.
“Medi-Cal has posters in every office I have been in for getting these gift cards,” she said. “I realized that these were used as incentives to vaccinate the poor.”
Clifford said she received a $50 Target gift card from her Medi-Cal health plan, CalOptima Health, for completing an adult wellness visit that included a depression questionnaire.
According to CalOptima Health’s member rewards website, the company uses gift cards to incentivize an array of preventative health visits, including cancer screenings, wellness checks, blood lead tests for infants and toddlers, and follow-up care for children on medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or ADHD.
IEHP declined to reveal its funding sources for the gift card program.
CalOptima Health and Medi-Cal did not respond to The Defender’s comment request by the deadline.
Providers outside California also pay members to get shots
Other Medicaid providers outside of California also reward parents with gift cards for vaccinating their children, but IEHP’s program appears to offer the highest dollar amount.
Sentara Health Plans, headquartered in Virginia Beach, Virginia, offers its Medicaid members up to $50 in gift cards per year for completing a slew of preventative services, including childhood and adolescent immunizations.
Sentara Health gives $25 when a member ages 6 months or older receives a COVID-19 shot.
The provider also offers $15 in exchange for a child receiving the childhood vaccination series by age 2. This includes two DTaP, three polio, one measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), three Haemophilus influenza type B (Hib), three hepatitis B, one chickenpox, four pneumococcal conjugate, one hepatitis A (Hep A), two or three rotavirus, and two flu vaccines.
Sentara Health also awards a $15 gift card when children ages 9 to 13 receive six different vaccines by their 13th birthday, including Hep A, rotavirus, flu, Tdap/td, meningococcal and HPV."
Related articles in The Defender
India’s Rotavirus Vaccine Increases Risk of Serious Bowel Condition in Infants — Are U.S. Vaccines Any Safer?
HPV Vaccine Increases Risk of Autonomic Dysfunction and Menstrual Irregularities in Young Women
HPV Vaccine May Cause Increase in Cancer-Causing Strains, Study Shows — But Media Puts Misleading Spin on Study’s Findings
Breaking: Federal Judge Hands Merck Win in Key Gardasil HPV Vaccine Case
Merck Used Highly Potent Aluminum in Gardasil HPV Vaccine Trials Without Informing Participants
Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D., is a reporter and researcher for The Defender based in Fairfield, Iowa.
*****************************
City Health Officials Tied to Soros Urge Public to ‘Get Vaccinated,’ Blame Policy Shifts for ‘Deadly Outbreaks’
by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
October 22, 2025
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20251022
(Podcast and hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...es-800x417.jpg
"A public health coalition linked to George Soros urged Americans to get vaccinated, blaming false statements from federal officials for falling vaccination rates and rising disease outbreaks. Financial reports show that Soros and other Big Pharma investors, including Bill Gates, finance the Big Cities Health Coalition.
A coalition of city public health officials with ties to pharma investor George Soros is urging the public to “get vaccinated.”
In an open letter, the Big Cities Health Coalition accused federal officials of driving down vaccination rates and fueling an increase in dangerous infectious disease outbreaks by making “repeated false claims” about vaccines.
They wrote:
“Vaccines have eradicated devastating diseases and saved millions of lives. They keep classrooms safe and schools open. They allow children to spend time with friends and enjoy their favorite activities. They help parents and caregivers work to support their families.
The letter also addresses recent changes to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recommended vaccine schedule for children and adults, though it does not mention U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. or President Donald Trump by name.
The coalition, which represents 35 U.S. cities and about a fifth of the U.S. population, “has been working together to exchange ideas and address public health threats for more than two decades,” according to CNN, which first reported on the letter Monday.
Participating cities include New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, Houston, Dallas, Cleveland, Milwaukee and Seattle.
The group’s financial documents reveal support from billionaire financier Soros. Soros has also invested heavily in the pharmaceutical industry, including COVID-19 vaccine makers Pfizer and AstraZeneca, and Gilead Sciences, which produces remdesivir, a controversial antiviral treatment frequently given to COVID-19 patients.
Coalition attempted to scrub funding from Soros- and Gates-linked groups
The Big Cities Health Coalition was founded in 2002, according to a now-deleted webpage. The current version of its website contains little more than the group’s recent letter.
Links to the organization’s 2023 and 2024 annual reports are no longer active, but can be found on the Internet Archive and elsewhere. The reports show that Soros and other major healthcare-related organizations, including groups connected to Bill Gates, finance the coalition.
According to its 2023 annual report, the Open Society Foundations, founded by Soros, funded the coalition. Other funders include the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, healthcare provider Kaiser Permanente and the CDC Foundation.
In 2022, the Soros Economic Development Fund, an extension of the Open Society Foundations, partnered with Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance and MedAccess, a pharma-industry broker connected to the U.K. government, to invest $200 million in developing COVID-19 vaccines.
The Gates Foundation is a major funder of Gavi.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation has financially supported FactCheck.org, which previously flagged COVID-19-related “misinformation” for Facebook.
The CDC Foundation’s donor list includes the World Health Organization, the Gates Foundation and vaccine manufacturers including Pfizer, Merck and Johnson & Johnson.
According to internal medicine physician Dr. Clayton J. Baker, the coalition’s annual reports reveal clear conflicts of interest.
“It’s informative to look into the funding of organizations like the Big Cities Health Coalition,” Baker said. He noted that Kaiser Permanente paid patients $50 to get COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic and fired employees who refused the shots, then tried to rehire them later when short-staffed.
According to the coalition’s Form 990 for fiscal year 2023, the organization spent $875,540 on “communications,” including engaging with “media, and federal policymakers about the importance of supporting local public health and health equity.”
The group also spent $433,703 on its “urban health agenda” and $147,397 on “equity/racial justice.”
The coalition’s members “meet periodically with Congressional staff” and “other federal government officials,” the filing states.
The organization’s schedule of contributors is listed as “restricted” in the filing.
Coalition blames unvaccinated for ‘deadly’ and ‘more frequent’ outbreaks
In its letter, the coalition blamed “declining” vaccination rates for “deadly outbreaks of diseases like measles and polio” and claimed that the outbreaks are “becoming more frequent.”
CNN reported that measles exposure at a South Carolina school led authorities to quarantine over 100 unvaccinated students, illustrating “one of the many reasons why Big Cities Health Coalition emphasizes the importance of vaccination.”
Research scientist and author James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., said that invoking measles and polio is a “manipulative framing device.” He said:
“Outbreaks of these diseases occur almost exclusively in highly vaccinated populations where immunity has waned, or where sanitation and migration variables are misattributed as ‘vaccine refusal.’
“By portraying every outbreak as proof of anti-vaccine rhetoric, the coalition seeks to recapture moral high ground based on presumptions of safety, without addressing the underlying immunologic and ecological data.”
The coalition’s letter also warned of a potential uptick of COVID-19 and flu infections in the “rapidly approaching” cold and flu season.
However, Baker said the coalition’s letter “contains absolutely zero genuine evidence” to support its claims. He said:
“The coalition’s statement is embarrassingly inane. They say, ‘We are united behind a simple message: get vaccinated.’ Vaccinated with what? They make no distinction between necessary or unnecessary, safe or unsafe, effective or ineffective shots. Just ‘get vaccinated.’ That’s like saying ‘get medicated.’ This is the asinine level of rhetoric to which vaccine fanatics are currently reduced.”
Emily Hilliard, press secretary for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), dismissed the coalition’s concerns.
“HHS is restoring the doctor-patient relationship so people can make informed decisions about their health with their providers,” Hilliard told The Defender.
Letter rooted in data, not ‘political ideology,’ coalition members say
Coalition members told CNN their letter is an attempt to restore public trust in science, not an effort to politicize public health recommendations.
“We have to make our public health decisions based on data and not on political ideology,” Dr. Philip Huang, director of the Dallas County Health and Human Services Department, told CNN. “We have to be the voices for that science and reason.”
Huang said the current CDC administration “seems more driven by political ideology than actual data and science, so it undermines the trust.”
Lyons-Weiler disputed the coalition’s claims, calling the letter “the opening salvo in an attempt to rebuild centralized narrative control over immunization policy.”
“Language such as ‘talk with your doctor’ and ‘tune out political noise’ is designed to sound apolitical while reinstating top-down message discipline,” he said.
CDC changes to vaccine policy spark pushback across U.S.
The coalition “is the latest group to take a strong public stand in support of vaccination as a direct response to concerns that the federal government is limiting access and raising doubts,” CNN reported.
Earlier this month, the CDC updated the childhood immunization schedule to recommend individual-based decision-making regarding COVID-19 vaccination for children 6 months and older, following the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) unanimous vote to adopt the recommendation.
Last month, ACIP also voted to recommend limiting the MMRV (measles, mumps, rubella and varicella, or chickenpox) vaccine to children ages 4 and older. And in June, the committee voted to stop recommending flu shots containing thimerosal — a preservative linked to neurodevelopmental disorders.
In response, 15 Democratic governors launched the Governors Public Health Alliance last week to coordinate their public health efforts independently of national public health agencies.
Previously, four Western states announced the formation of the West Coast Health Alliance, which aims to issue its own immunization guidelines.
In August, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued “evidence-based” recommendations calling for COVID-19 shots for infants, young children and children in “high-risk” groups. In July, the AAP and five other medical organizations sued Kennedy over new COVID-19 vaccine guidance."
Related articles in The Defender
15 Democratic Governors Form ‘Nonpartisan’ Alliance to Bypass RFK Jr.’s Health Policies
‘Dangerous Games’: States Defy Federal Agencies, Create Their Own COVID Vaccine Rules
Eight Northeast States Eye End Run Around CDC Vaccine Recommendations
Leading Pediatrician Group Defies CDC, Tells Parents to Get COVID Shots for Infants, Kids
Key Takeaways From Last Week’s Meeting of New CDC Vaccine Advisers
CDC Vaccine Advisers Vote to Stop Recommending Flu Shots That Contain Thimerosal
Data Analyst Faces EMA's Demand to Delete Pharmacovigilance Data!
Oct 25, 2025
https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/breaki...yst-faces-emas
"At the Back to the Future conference in the Netherlands, I sat down with Wouter Aukema, an ethical hacker and renowned data analyst, whose groundbreaking work on the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) EudraVigilance case safety reporting system has shed unprecedented light on the alarming adverse effects associated with the COVID shots.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...ded-236042.png
'My bombshell interview with data expert and ethical computer hacker, Wouter Aukema from the Netherlands, exposes the true horrors of the trove of data buried within the European Medicines Agency’s Eu…'
Read full story:https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/data-c...-covid-vaccine
Aukema’s innovative dashboards, built to make public pharmacovigilance data accessible and navigable, have empowered patients, doctors, and researchers to uncover critical insights into adverse events linked to medications, including the COVID shots. However, just days before his scheduled presentation, Aukema received a bombshell email from the EMA, demanding he delete his dashboards and all associated data—a move he describes as legal pressure that feels like censorship.
Aukema’s journey began with a mission to simplify access to the EMA’s EudraVigilance system, a public database housing millions of adverse event reports for medicinal products, including vaccines. Frustrated by the system’s complexity, which restricts users to viewing data for one product at a time, Aukema developed software—initially inspired by a tool from French scientists—to download and aggregate the entire dataset. His Tableau dashboards (https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aukema/vizzes ) a product of this effort, present a holistic view of adverse event reports across 6,000 medicinal products, including the COVID shots.
“The power of the dashboards,” Aukema explained, “is that it shows the reporting on all 6,000 different medicinal products, substances, vaccines, including the COVID vaccines.”
One of his most shocking findings was that the most reported adverse event for the COVID shots in the EudraVigilance system was, astonishingly, COVID-19 itself. Aukema also uncovered that adverse event reports for these vaccines dwarfed those for other drugs and vaccines over the past two decades—a finding he attributes partly to the sheer scale of global vaccination campaigns but one that raises questions about the safety profile of these shots.
Aukema’s dashboards include a “case locator” tool, which allows patients, doctors, or family members who file adverse event reports to verify how their submissions are recorded in the EMA’s system. This tool proved invaluable when Aukema filed a report on behalf of a family member hospitalized with acute pancreatitis following a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. To his dismay, he discovered the case was misclassified in the EMA database, with the critical detail of hospitalization omitted and marked instead as “other,” a far less severe designation. After confronting the Dutch authority, LAREB, they admitted the error and promised to correct it. Aukema revealed that “dozens of people” who used his case locator found similar errors in their reports, ranging from missing side effects to misattributions of who reported the case—issues that could undermine the credibility of pharmacovigilance data.
But Aukema’s efforts to bring transparency to this public data have come at a cost. Just a day before his conference presentation, he discovered an email from the EMA in his spam folder, with a subject line that sent chills: “Request to immediately delete non-public information originating from the EudraVigilance system and made available on the dashboards you have on Tableau Public.”
The EMA claimed that Aukema’s dashboards, which include worldwide unique case identifiers and country-of-origin data, pose an “indirect” risk of identifying patients, a claim he finds baffling. “I have no access to patients’ birth dates or names,” he insisted. “Even if that data was available, I would never have downloaded it. My objective is to gather insights on patterns, not to find people.” The EMA’s letter not only demanded the deletion of Aukema’s dashboards but also urged him to destroy all data collected over years of work and ensure third parties do the same—a responsibility he finds absurd. Forced to comply, Aukema spent hours until 4 a.m. redacting his conference presentation to avoid sharing the contested data, a decision he made out of respect for the EMA’s concerns, even if he doesn’t fully agree.
“It comes across as a form of legal pressure,” he admitted. “My initial reaction is I’m being censored.” This isn’t the first time Aukema has faced pushback. In a 2022 interview on Dutch YouTube channel Blackbox, (https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aukema/vizzes ) he highlighted the mysterious disappearance of 40% of serious adverse event cases from the EudraVigilance system over time. The EMA’s press office responded by accusing him of “misleading allegations” without clarifying what he got wrong or engaging in dialogue. “They didn’t correct me,” Aukema said. “They just accused me.”
This pattern of dismissal, coupled with the recent legal letter, raises questions about the EMA’s commitment to transparency, especially when their public database is touted as a hallmark of openness. Aukema contrasts the EMA’s approach with the U.S. pharmacovigilance systems, like VAERS, which freely share detailed case narratives and even state-of-residence data without apparent privacy concerns. “I do not understand why I’m not allowed to know whether a patient came from Germany, Poland, or Holland, whereas in the U.S., they have no problem sharing the state of residence,” he said. The EMA’s insistence that country-of-origin data could indirectly identify patients seems inconsistent, particularly when Aukema’s dashboards require a case identifier—accessible only to the reporter—to be useful. When asked what he believes the EMA’s true fears are, Aukema hesitated to speculate beyond the stated privacy concerns but expressed a willingness to engage in open dialogue. “I’m more than happy to have a debate with them,” he said, noting that his redacted presentation demonstrates his goodwill. Yet, the timing and tone of the EMA’s demands suggest an attempt to silence a researcher whose work has exposed uncomfortable truths about the COVID shots.
The full EMA letter can be viewed below
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...6_738x1032.png
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...c6_674x900.png
I'm not often shocked. But this image really did shock me.
https://avalonlibrary.net/Bill/an_in...ient_study.jpg
I really do think that the human race as we once knew it is dying. Not a joke or an exaggeration. But that's off-topic on this thread.
Related:Quote:
Posted by Bill Ryan
A few days ago I uploaded to the library the Del Bigtree documentary and it's here for anyone interested in viewing it. I haven't watched it myself yet. If time permits I may delve into it on the weekend:
An Inconvenient Study
William Makis (McGill Medicine)
BREAKING NEWS: Very excited about this! 😃
"Oncologists sound the Alarm: Investigating the "Turbo Cancer" and COVID-19 Vaccine Link"
Absolute legends on this panel!
@Kevin_McKernan
@DrTrozzi
Dr Ute Kruger
Christof Plothe
https://x.com/MakisMedicine/status/1991670478948421814
CDC Website No Longer Rejects Autism-Vaccine Link
— New language reflects HHS secretary's vaccine skepticism
November 20, 2025
The CDC changed its website on Wednesday to suggest there may be a link between vaccines and autism.
The site previously stated that studies have shown "there is no link between receiving vaccines and developing autism spectrum disorder (ASD)," and that "no links have been found between any vaccine ingredients and ASD."
Under HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent vaccine skeptic, the CDC page now says that "the claim 'vaccines do not cause autism' is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism."
The new page also states that "studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities."
The phrase "vaccines do not cause autism" remained on the new CDC page, but a footnote noted the phrase had not been removed due to an agreement with Sen. Bill Cassidy, MD (R-La.), who heads the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.
Article
"A Midwestern Doctor" just published a powerful, deeply researched piece titled "Why Have Vaccines Become a Religion?" that explains exactly why rational discussion about vaccines has become nearly impossible.
The article opens with nephrologist Dr. Suzanne Humphries noticing in 2009 that flu shots were triggering kidney failure in her hospitalized patients.
When she asked to delay vaccination until patients were stable, hospital leadership refused, citing the "medical religion" of vaccination and the fact that major organizations endorsed universal flu shots under Obamacare penalties.
Before mandates, many nurses openly protested the flu vaccine; after mandates, almost all complied and began defending it zealously.
The author identifies three primary reasons physicians cling to vaccine dogma despite contradictory evidence:
1. The prestige myth of modern medicine. The AMA created a monopoly, technological interventions became highly profitable, and the public was taught that vaccines (along with antibiotics) eradicated infectious disease. Books like Dissolving Illusions demonstrate that mortality from most diseases had already fallen 90-99% before vaccines arrived, thanks to sanitation and nutrition.
2. Psychological factors. Many doctors receive minimal vaccine training yet suffer from extreme overconfidence (Dunning-Kruger). Admitting vaccines can harm would create unbearable cognitive dissonance and threaten their careers, so they double down.
3. Societal shift toward scientism. As traditional religion has declined, blind faith in "science" and public health authorities has filled the spiritual void. Vaccination has become a modern ritual and sacrament.
The piece draws heavily from Robert Mendelsohn's 1979 book Confessions of a Medical Heretic, which compared medicine to organized religion: white coats as priestly robes, stethoscopes as talismans, prescriptions as communion wafers, surgery as sacrifice, and vaccination as baptism with "holy water" that cleanses original sin (susceptibility to disease).
The system demands that doctors "do something" even when intervention causes harm, leading to exploding rates of chronic illness.
Aaron Siri's new book Vaccines Amen is highlighted for showing how the vaccine program operates exactly like a religion: authority figures (Offit, Plotkin) function as high priests, contradictions are ignored when they favor the faith, and absence of evidence is treated as evidence of perfection.
True placebo-controlled trials are considered unethical, so no proper long-term safety studies exist for the childhood schedule.
When independent pediatricians like Paul Thomas compared health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children and found dramatically better results in the unvaccinated, they lost their licenses before the data could be published.
Journals are heavily biased, regulatory agencies are captured (the 1986 Act removed liability and key safety provisions were never implemented despite Siri winning lawsuits proving it), and post-marketing surveillance is essentially nonexistent.
Clinical trials use tricks such as short monitoring periods, active placebos containing adjuvants, chaining new vaccines to older ones with known high injury rates, unblinding, and subjective reclassification of serious adverse events to make products appear safe.
The result is a system that assumes safety first and suppresses any evidence to the contrary.
Benefits are exaggerated, risks are massive yet hidden, and questioning the program is treated as heresy.
The COVID mRNA rollout exposed these patterns to millions who previously trusted the system unquestioningly.
The author concludes that the vaccine program has survived not because of overwhelming evidence, but because it functions as society's new religion, complete with dogma, rituals, priesthood, and excommunication of heretics.
As censorship fades and uncensored data spreads, that faith is finally cracking.
Full article: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/w...ome-a-religion
HELP expose Moderna
James Roguski
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/help
11/23/25
(Hyperlinks and Audio at the link not embedded here)
"I have obtained access to dozens of "confidential" Moderna documents and I would greatly appreciate help from anyone and everyone who would be willing to help read, review and analyze these documents.
I have recently gained access to dozens of “confidential” Moderna documents which contain several thousand pages of critical data.
If you would like to collaborate and help out on this enormous project, please contact me (James Roguski) directly:
via phone or text message at 310-619-3055 or
via Signal, Telegram or WhatsApp,
or send an email to me at James.Roguski@gmail.com
If you want to do even more, especially if you have any special skills (writing, editing, graphics, audio, video, etc.) then there is certainly more that you can do to help in an even bigger way. Every little bit helps.
If you are a podcaster, if you have a newsletter on Substack or other platform, or if you are involved or connected to any media outlet, please contact me ASAP.
My request is very simple: Please help by reading, reviewing and analyzing at least one of the many available documents.
SEND ME A TEXT MESSAGE AND I WILL SEND YOU A DOCUMENT TO REVIEW.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...1000x1000.jpeg
The purpose of this article is to organize people around the world to examine this information and help expose these facts to the world.
I have provided a few samples below so that you can get an idea of the type of information that you will encounter in these documents.
Page 14:https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...5_1507x889.png
Page 138:https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...9_1867x865.png
This extensive data archive demands urgent and critical analysis.
Let’s all work together to analyze the documents that are currently available while demanding the release of the documents that are still being hidden from us.
I call on the scientific and medical research community, the public in general, and especially my supportive readers, to take immediate and massive action:
Contact me directly if you want to help.
Analyse the information in the documents for yourself.
Make your own assessment and arrive at your own conclusions.
Confront the regulatory assessment that Moderna’s SPIKEVAX was “safe and effective”
Help raise the world’s awareness of these documented horrors. Please share this article far and wide:If you would like to collaborate and help out on this enormous project, please contact me (James Roguski) directly
via phone or text message at 310-619-3055 or
via Signal, Telegram or WhatsApp,
or send an email to me at James.Roguski@gmail.com
If you want to do even more, especially if you have any special skills (writing, editing, graphics, audio, video, etc.) then there is certainly more that you can do to help in an even bigger way. Every little bit helps.
If you are a podcaster, if you have a newsletter on Substack or other platform, or if you are involved or connected to any media outlet, please contact me ASAP.
James Roguski
310-619-3055
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
NotSafeAndNotEffective.com
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...1000x1500.jpeg
DETAILS: REPEALThePREPAct.com
SIGN THE PETITION: REPEALThePREPAct.ORG
All support is deeply appreciated.
Share
Leave a comment
James Roguski’s newsletter is reader-supported. "
Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6zxf8u/?pub=4
James Roguski
Nov 30, 2025
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/there-was-no-virus
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...1600x1024.jpeg
"Fear and absolutely insane behavior was triggered based on a genetic sequence that was stored in a computer.
The fourth round of negotiations for the WHO’s Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) System Annex to the Pandemic Agreement will be held December 1-5, 2025.
https://apps.who.int/gb/IGWG/e/e_igwg4.html
Please realize that they are negotiating to set up a worldwide network so share genetic information from “pathogens with pandemic potential.”
They do NOT need actual pathogens.
All they need is a genetic sequence in a computer.
This article is based on resources that are available on Jon Fleetwood’s Substack account. I strongly encourage you to subscribe to his newsletter and support his work.
JonFleetwood.substack.com/archive
I also encourage you to support the organization (U.S. Right to Know) that submitted the FOIA request that obtained the following document:database.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...1_1000x289.png
“The program is open about building a platform that works even when no physical virus exists, only a computer file.”
Jon Fleetwood
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._1411x580.jpeg
In plain terms, DARPA expected outbreaks where governments supply genome files instead of biological agents, requiring U.S. laboratories to fabricate the infectious agent themselves.
The evidence suggests the world may not have experienced a natural viral pandemic, but a global biological rollout built around a DIGITALLY ASSEMBLED spike protein that became the foundation for diagnostics, modeling, and the mass vaccination campaign itself.
DARPA’s insistence that full pandemic response must function when “only electronic viral sequence information” exists directly affirms the core premise of Fleetwood’s findings: modern biodefense systems treat digital code as a virus, converting computational constructs into physical biological entities.
The FOIA document reveals that DARPA was funding workflows where a virus is born as data, and only afterward turned into an infectious clone—the same conceptual pathway through which the 32% human-derived mosaic spike emerged.
The Wuhan-Hu-1 spike (COVID-19 spike protein), assembled entirely in silico and containing a non-coronavirus-derived mosaic, fits precisely within the digital-first, synthetic-construction pandemic pipeline DARPA had already built before COVID-19 emerged.
The DARPA document suggests the disturbing possibility that the COVID-19 “pandemic” may have originated not from a naturally circulating virus, but from a computationally generated sequence that was subsequently treated as a real pathogen and mass-manufactured into international medical countermeasures (“vaccines”).
And because this digitally assembled spike became the sole antigen used by Pfizer and Moderna, the world’s first mass-distributed mRNA vaccines could have effectively programmed billions of human bodies to manufacture the same engineered, domain-modular construct…
In other words, billions of people may have been injected with instructions to manufacture a synthetic, digitally designed spike protein born not from nature, but from a Pentagon–NIH engineering pipeline.
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/...demic-pipeline
The SARS-CoV-2 genome was first reported as a COMPUTATIONALLY ASSEMBLED consensus sequence derived from fragmented RNA extracted from broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of a single patient with pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 (Wu et al., 2020).
No purified viral particles were isolated, and fulfillment of Koch’s postulates was not attempted.
The resulting 29,903-nucleotide sequence (Wuhan-Hu-1, NC_045512.2) was rapidly adopted as the reference for diagnostic assays, phylogenetic studies, and vaccine development.
Notably, the spike glycoprotein encoded by this sequence (YP_009724390.1) was incorporated—after minor stabilization mutations (K986P/V987P)—into the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) vaccines, which were designed, manufactured, and distributed within one year of sequence publication.
This IN SILICO-DERIVED sequence serves as the antigen in mRNA vaccines administered to over five billion individuals.
Here, we report that 32% (416 amino acids) of this spike exhibits significant local similarity to Human Endogenous RetroViral (HERV) elements and cellular proteins across six functional domains:
membrane fusion
receptor binding
immune modulation
intracellular trafficking
structural rigidity, and
metabolic interference.
These alignments… are absent in bat or pangolin coronaviruses.
https://zenodo.org/records/17584539 (136 pages)
A 32% Human Derived Mosaic In The In Silico Assembled Sars Cov 2 Spike Protein Accidental Contaminant Misincorporation Or Intentional Functional Chimeric Design
762KB ∙ PDF file A_32%_Human_Derived_Mosaic_In_The_In_Silico_Assembled_Sars_Cov_2_Spike_
Protein_Accidental_Contaminant_Misincorporation_Or_Intentional_Functional_
Chimeric_Design 762KB ∙ PDF file
The SARS-CoV-2 reference spike glycoprotein (Wuhan-Hu-1, YP_009724390.1)—the sole antigen in mRNA vaccines administered to billions of individuals—was not derived from a purified virion but was ASSEMBLED IN SILICO by Wu et al. (2020) from fragmented RNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid using Trinity and MEGAHIT without exclusion of human references or plaque purification.
This study demonstrates that 32% (416 of 1273 amino acids) of this computationally generated spike consists of extended, functionally conserved segments of human proteins…—precisely distributed across all six canonical domains previously rendered modular and swappable in a 15-year NIH/NIAID-funded chimeric coronavirus program led by Ralph Baric (16 pre-2020 publications) and explicitly claimed in US patent 9,884,895 B2 (2018) for substitution “from any source.”
Independent protein BLAST searches against the human proteome (Fleetwood, 2025; six independent runs, RIDs H2C3P344014–H498WK63016) reveal that every one of these six pre-engineered domains now contains extended, statistically significant segments of human origin totaling 416 amino acids—32% of the mature 1273-residue spike. These human-derived sequences are absent in the closest purported natural relatives (RaTG13, BANAL-52, Gd/2017, RpYN06) and in all other publicly available sarbecoviruses, rendering convergent natural evolution biologically implausible.
The evidence presented raises four unresolved scientific and ethical questions that warrant immediate independent investigation:
Is the reference spike most parsimoniously explained as a modular human–coronavirus chimera produced by application of pre-existing, patented technology?
Did the documented un-blinded assembly methodology necessarily maximize incorporation of functional human protein segments into each pre-engineered domain?
Is the 32% human-mosaic spike biologically distinguishable from the chimeras generated by the Baric and Bieniasz laboratories over the preceding two decades?
Why was an in silico antigen—never isolated from a physical virion and built on a platform explicitly designed for domain substitution from any source—selected as the template for global diagnostics and mRNA vaccination?
https://zenodo.org/records/17634331 (27 pages)
The Sars Cov 2 Reference Spike (wuhan Hu 1) A 32% Human Derived Mosaic Built On A 15 Year Nih Funded Chimeric Coronavirus Platform And Patented Modular Design (us9884895b2) 343KB ∙ PDF file
file:///C:/Users/onawa/Downloads/The_Sars_Cov_2_Reference_Spike_(wuhan_Hu_1)_A_32%25_Human_Derived_Mosaic_Built_On_A_15_Year_Nih_Fund ed_Chimeric_Coronavirus_Platform_And_Patented_Modular_Design_(us9884895b2).pdf
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!hjie!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fa62987a7-9bd0-4281-8df6-b829d99f1f6c_1000x1000.png
PLEASE SEE MY PREVIOUS ARTICLES:
CEPI's Pandemic Preparedness Engine
James Roguski
Nov 19
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...b_1250x800.png
Bill Gates’ organization, The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) [pronounced “seppy”], wants access to the PABS database of “pathogens with pandemic potential” so that they can use artificial intelligence to accelerate vaccine development through their “Pandemic Preparedness Engine.”
Read full story:https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/...redness-engine
The Biological Warfare Arms Race is Heating Up
James Roguski
Nov 12
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...7_1250x800.png
Please watch the video below
Read the full story: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/...fare-arms-race
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...4_1024x312.png
[QUOTE]
JonFleetwood.com
Was the Wuhan 'COVID Spike' Really HERV-K—A Human Protein Mistaken for a Virus?
Could the COVID-19 “spike protein” have been not viral at all, but rather the spike-shaped HERV-K—an ancient endogenous retroviral protein encoded in human DNA and known to activate during inflammation and stress…
Read more: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/...utm_medium=web[/QUOTE
James Roguski
310-619-3055
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
NotSafeAndNotEffective.com
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!2JjO!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbd281d47-a137-4a58-a10c-3fb2fa660c84_1000x1500.jpeg
DETAILS: REPEALThePREPAct.com
SIGN THE PETITION: REPEALThePREPAct.ORG
All support is deeply appreciated.
Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6zemcy/?pub=4
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/f...x-rules-coming
FDA's "Profound Revelation": COVID Shots Killed At Least 10 Children, Stronger Vax Rules Coming
by Tyler Durden
Sunday, Nov 30, 2025 - 06:05 PM
The Food and Drug Administration's top overseer of vaccine policy on Friday told employees that at least 10 American children died "after and because of receiving" a Covid-19 vaccine. In a 3,000-word memorandum first reported by PBS, Dr. Vinay Prasad, director of the FDA's vaccine division, also committed to implementing changes to the FDA's evaluation of vaccine efficacy and safety, and encouraged dissenting employees to find a new job.
“This is a profound revelation,” Prasad wrote. “For the first time, the US FDA will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children.” Prasad said the conclusion about children dying from Covid-19 vaccines was reached after he and other FDA staffers undertook a multi-month, "detailed analysis of deaths voluntarily reported to the [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] system (VAERS)."
That effort focused on 96 deaths that occurred between 2021 and 2024, and said "no fewer" than 10 of them were caused by the vaccines. "If anything, this represents conservative coding, where vaccines are exculpated rather than indicted in cases of ambiguity. The real number is higher." He added,
"It is horrifying to consider that the US vaccine regulation, including our actions, may have harmed more children than we saved. This requires humility and introspection."
https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-pu...?itok=7ewPzyI1
Prasad slammed the coercive nature of policies that insisted on Covid shots for children:
"Healthy young children who faced tremendously low risk of death were coerced, at the behest of the Biden administration, via school and work mandates, to receive a vaccine that could result in death. In many cases, such mandates were harmful. It is difficult to read cases where kids aged 7 to 16 may be dead as a result of covid vaccines ...
FDA has never requested the manufacturers demonstrate in randomized fashion that vaccinating children improves...outcomes. The available randomized data in children is deeply limited, and broadly negative for symptomatic infection, as discussed in prior ad-coms. Furthermore, COVID-19 was never highly lethal for children, and now MIS-c [Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children] has decreased drastically, and the harms, to kids, are comparable to many respiratory viruses for which we do not provide annual immunization."
Prasad -- a hematologist-oncologist -- was among several outspoken critics of the Covid-19 regime that moved into key public health posts after Trump took office in January. Others include Robert F. Kennedy, Jr as Health and Human Services secretary, Dr. Marty Makary as FDA commissioner and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya as Director of the National Institutes of Health.
Friday's memorandum emphasizes that VAERS likely understates vaccine-triggered mortality:
"When it comes to vaccine deaths, VAERS is passively reported. It requires a motivated person, often a doctor, to submit the information. The submission process is tedious and most people who start the form give up along the way. Many more deaths may be unreported."
To minimize future vaccine-driven deaths, Prasad said the FDA "will take swift action regarding this new safety concern" and "will demand pre-market randomized trials assessing clinical endpoints for most new products." Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, Prasad repeatedly sounded alarms about public health interventions that were imposed without rigorous efforts to seek evidence of their risks and rewards. This has been a central theme in his body of work; he also authored a book, "Malignant: How Bad Policy and Bad Evidence Harm People with Cancer."
Prasad said the FDA will also "revise the annual flu vaccine framework," which he called "an evidence-based catastrophe of low quality evidence." He also acknowledged that "[FDA has] not been focused on understanding the benefits and harms of giving multiple vaccines at the same time." He ended the memo by urging staffers who aren't comfortable with the new approach to resign:
"I remain open to vigorous discussions and debate on these topics, as I have always been. I am open minded to modifications or alterations...Some staff may not agree with these core principles and operating principles. Please submit your resignation letters to your supervisor and CC my deputy Katherine Szarama...for those who choose to remain...I look forward to working with you."
Prasad's pointed statement about vaccine-caused deaths comes ahead of this week's meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine committee. The draft agenda for the meetings on Dec 4 and 5 includes FDA policy on giving hepatitis B vaccines to newborn babies, and the entire children's immunization schedule. The meetings are open to the public via live webcasts.
It's noteworthy that major media outlets that obtained a copy of Prasad's memorandum have only provided short quotations from it, seemingly seeking to undercut Prasad's assault on the Covid regime those same outlets unquestioningly supported. You can read the entire 3,000-word memo at The Brownstone Institute, a site originally launched to scrutinize Covid policies.
Dr. Robert Malone, a Covid vaccine critic with credentials in mRNA technology, hailed Prasad's memorandum as a historic milestone. "I am stunned, gobsmacked by his letter," he wrote at Malone News. "The significance and importance of this letter in the context of US and global vaccine policy cannot be overestimated. This is a revolution, the likes of which I never expected to see in my lifetime. The Washington Post called me a liar for stating what is now official FDA policy and truth."
Of course, vaccines were just one of many public health policies of the Covid era that may have done far more harm than good. With a Pandora's box of policy side-effects that include impaired child development, learning loss, a surge in mental breakdowns, soaring juvenile suicide attempts, increased drug and alcohol abuse, increased domestic violence and higher drug overdoses, it's increasingly clear that, in its coercive, ham-handed approach to Covid-19, public health didn't err on the side of caution, but rather erred on the side of catastrophe.
Vaccine Stocks Drop After FDA Memo Links COVID Shots To Child Deaths
by Tyler Durden
Monday, Dec 01, 2025 - 12:45 PM
Vaccine stocks slumped Monday after an explosive memo from FDA vaccine chief Vinay Prasad surfaced late Friday, signaling the agency is preparing to roll out tough restrictions on new vaccines for children. Prasad described a "profound revelation" linking Covid shots to at least ten deaths in children.
By late morning, Vaccine makers dropped on the memo: Moderna -6%, BioNTech -4.3%, Novavax -4%, Vaxcyte -6.6%.
https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-pu...?itok=asg2dW2s
< more at link >
Tony Seruga
@TonySeruga
🚨Prasad FDA Memo: Regulatory Implications
Yes, the investigation of VAERS childhood deaths is important. But Media is overlooking the big picture.
—Dr. Robert W. Malone
I spent my early Monday hours today doomscrolling through “X”, monitoring the outrage and consternation concerning FDA/CBER director Dr. Vinay Prasad’s “official” (actually unofficial “leaked”) acknowledgment that there have been COVID mRNA-induced vaccine deaths of children. Yes, I guess that is an important event, but I first became aware of these specific findings last summer in the context of my service at ACIP. So, it's pretty much yesterday’s news for me.
Because of how I first encountered the data and investigation findings, I am embargoed by FACA federal law from disclosing what I know of them. However, I can assure you that the findings of Dr. Tracy Beth Hoeg (FDA Office of the Commissioner, ACIP FDA liaison) are much more shocking than just the number and age of the vaccine-related deaths.
In reviewing the social media posts and chatter, what seems to be almost completely overlooked are the Regulatory policy components of this “leaked” internal memo from Director Prasad to his bureaucracy. When I wrote my initial essay last Saturday posting the letter with a brief introduction (titled “A Revolution in Vaccine Regulation and Approval”), it was the public policy changes being announced that struck me as revolutionary. I have been alerting parents to the risks of harm to children from the genetic COVID vaccines for many years now. Not surprisingly, I experienced a wave of concerted attacks for this from corporate media, internet trolls/bots, and even the Israeli and Spanish governments! But I stand by every word, and have been vindicated and validated since (including by this recent memo from CBER Director Dr. Prasad). The fact that pediatric deaths have occurred post coerced and mandated inoculation with these products is not news to me.
Continue reading >>>
https://malone.news/p/prasad-fda-mem...y-implications
Chief Nerd
@TheChiefNerd
·
Dec 1
🔥 Adam Carolla Reacts to the FDA Linking COVID Vaccines to Child Deaths
“Next time ask a f**king question, would you please, before you light your Fauci candle? F**king dumb sh*ts … You guys f**ked up your kids in the name of safety … Keep listening to dopes who lie to you.”
https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1...928215390?s=20
Vaccine Injury Lawyer Delivers Scathing Rebuke of Childhood Vaccine Schedule — Offit, Hotez Decline Invitation to Debate
by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
Childrens Health Defense
December 5, 2025
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tation-debate/
(Video and podcast at the link. Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)
(But it's only been proven that a mere 10 kids died from vaccines, right? NOT!! :facepalm:)
"Vaccine Injury Lawyer Delivers Scathing Rebuke of Childhood Vaccine Schedule — Offit, Hotez Decline Invitation to Debate
Attorney Aaron Siri told members of the CDC vaccine advisory panel that the childhood vaccines were recommended without sufficient data and that the expansion of the CDC schedule coincided with a rise in chronic illness among U.S. children. The panel invited high-profile vaccine proponents Paul Offit and Peter Hotez to present along with Siri, but they declined.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine advisory committee today heard from a vaccine injury lawyer who proposed the committee revisit the childhood vaccine schedule.
Attorney Aaron Siri told members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) that the vaccines were recommended without sufficient data and that the expansion of the schedule coincided with a rise in chronic illness among U.S. children.
Siri, a vaccine critic and author of “Vaccines, Amen: The Religion of Vaccines,” called for a reexamination of the childhood immunization schedule based on “robust” safety data.
Siri challenged claims that the childhood vaccination schedule has been tested in its entirety, that the vaccines are safe and that routine childhood vaccines have been proven to prevent transmission.
He also questioned claims that scientists have conducted the testing necessary to assert definitively that there is no possible link between vaccines and autism.
Siri recommended ACIP revisit childhood vaccine recommendations based on “robust” clinical trial and post-licensure safety data and called on the committee to respect the “right of informed consent.”
“Mandates make vaccines political” and also “impact those who most need to avoid” certain vaccines, he said. When people report vaccine injuries, members of the medical community “pretend that they don’t exist.”
Siri represents plaintiffs in vaccine-related lawsuits against federal agencies and pharmaceutical companies.
Children’s Health Defense CEO Mary Holland said Siri “accurately compared the pre-1986 Act vaccine schedule with the post-1986 schedule, when doctors and vaccine manufacturers have been absolved from all real responsibility for the vast vaccine injuries they have caused,” Holland said.
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 granted vaccine makers immunity from liability for most injuries caused by their products.
ACIP didn’t vote on any aspect of the childhood vaccine schedule today. In June, ACIP formed a committee to study the cumulative effect of all vaccines given during childhood.
Key vaccine advocates declined ACIP’s invitation to deliver presentations
Siri’s presentation came shortly after ACIP voted to end the recommendation that all infants born in the U.S. receive the hepatitis B (Hep B) vaccine within 12-24 hours of birth.
The committee also voted to recommend that families determine whether to give their child the Hep B shot at birth through individual decision-making and consultation with their physician.
Siri cited the licensing of Hep B vaccines as an example of flawed studies leading to the licensing of a vaccine. He called those studies “underpowered” and “industry-funded.”
Siri’s presentation stirred controversy even before it began. In a post on X yesterday, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), chairman of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions (HELP) Committee, dismissed Siri’s qualifications and said ACIP “is totally discredited.”
https://x.com/SenBillCassidy/status/...tion-debate%2F
Siri responded that Cassidy’s post was “deeply ironic,” given that vaccine manufacturers are legally protected from lawsuits.Quote:
Post
See new posts
Conversation
U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D.
@SenBillCassidy
Aaron Siri is a trial attorney who makes his living suing vaccine manufacturers. He is presenting as if an expert on childhood vaccines. The ACIP is totally discredited. They are not protecting children.
https://cdc.gov/acip/downloads/agend...-12-03-508.pdf
6:55 AM · Dec 4, 2025
438.1K
Views
“Childhood vaccines are the only product in America where you cannot ever sue the company that killed or injured your child on the basis the company could’ve made the product safer. If vaccines are so safe, why do they need this protection?” Siri wrote on X"
https://x.com/AaronSiriSG/status/199...tion-debate%2F
ACIP member Dr. Cody Meissner called Siri’s presentation a “terrible distortion of all the facts” and said Siri shouldn’t have been invited. Earlier, Meissner voted against the proposal to end the universal Hep B vaccine recommendation for newborns.Quote:
http://Aaron Siri
@AaronSiriSG
Senator Cassidy, your tweet is deeply ironic given that I cannot virtually ever sue vaccine companies for vaccine deaths and harms because of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. Childhood vaccines are the only product in America where you cannot ever sue the company that killed or injured your child on the basis the company could've made the product safer. If vaccines are so safe, why do they need this protection?
While I don’t “make a living” suing vaccine companies, representatives of vaccine companies regularly speak before ACIP to increase sales of their vaccine products. Yet, I have never heard you take issue with those presenters. Under your logic, in deciding upon a new car, one should only listen to car companies and salesmen, but not consumer advocates, like Ralph Nader, who sought to make them safer.
Since you want to engage with me publicly, let's make it substantive. Bring your evidence and let's have a long form public debate where we each get 10 minutes to go back and forth on each major vaccine topic. Will you agree to that?
ACIP also addressed controversy over Siri’s presentation and the lack of a pro-vaccine counterweight. Mina Zadeh, Ph.D., ACIP’s executive secretary, said the committee “invited several people to give us a broad perspective” on the childhood vaccination schedule.
Those invitees included two prominent and outspoken promoters of vaccines — Dr. Paul Offit and Peter Hotez, M.D., Ph.D. Both declined. Hotez told STAT that Siri “shouldn’t be there in the first place.”
Siri responded that the U.S. has “the worst health outcomes of all developed countries.”
Liability shield disincentivizes vaccine makers from performing proper safety testing
Siri used the opportunity today to criticize the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. He said the liability shield provided by that law disincentivized vaccine manufacturers from focusing on the safety of their products.
“Companies, including pharmaceutical companies, are driven by economic self-interest,” Siri said. “With drugs and non-routine vaccines, they … remain liable for the injuries caused by those products after they come to market and hence, they have an economic self-interest in doing robust clinical trials beforehand.”
“When it comes to routine childhood vaccines … they don’t have those same concerns,” Siri said.
He said the number of vaccines on the childhood schedule skyrocketed — from three to 72 — after Congress passed the 1986 act. Those initial three vaccines “were causing so much harm, all the manufacturers stopped making them or went out of business,” prompting the passage of the act.
“For every other product I’m aware of, the solution is to make a better, safer product. But when it came to these vaccines, Congress went a different way” by giving these companies “unprecedented broad immunity,” Siri said.
‘You can’t find what you’re not studying’
Siri also criticized the shortened clinical trial process for childhood vaccines, which results in recommendations being made on the basis of insufficient data and the inability to detect any long-term health impacts from the vaccines.
“Most recommendations for routine use by ACIP of a particular vaccine happened very shortly after its licensure, and hence the primary data often available for a specific vaccine would have been its clinical trial data,” Siri said.
He also criticized the lack of post-licensure safety monitoring.
“You can’t find what you’re not studying,” Siri said. “When you give a product to a baby or an infant in particular, you often won’t know what neurological, immunological or developmental issues that product can cause until you’ve tracked that child for at least a few years.”
Citing autism as the “injury claimed to be the most thoroughly studied,” Siri said the medical community has not conducted studies that would definitively eliminate a vaccine-autism link, even though the 1986 act listed autism as one of 11 conditions that warrant further study to determine a possible link with vaccination.
“It was a commonly claimed enough injury back in 1986 … to make it on this list of 11 conditions,” Siri said.
U.S. ‘an international outlier’ on childhood vaccination
Today’s meeting also included a presentation by Tracy Beth Høeg, M.D., Ph.D., who earlier this week was named the next leader of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Høeg compared U.S. childhood vaccine requirements and health outcomes with those of her native Denmark. There are “eye-opening differences in the recommendations” between the two countries, she said.
While the U.S. requires 72 core childhood vaccine doses, Denmark requires 11 — in line with most other high-income countries. Høeg said this makes the U.S. “an international outlier” on childhood vaccination.
The higher vaccine load “results in an increased exposure to aluminum,” Høeg said, with U.S. children exposed to 5.9 milligrams (mg) of aluminum by age 2 and 8.0 mg by age 18. In Denmark, the corresponding figures are 1.4 and 2.9 mg, similar to other high-income countries.
While there isn’t “robust enough” data indicating “specific health concerns” resulting from this level of aluminum exposure, Høeg said there also is insufficient data to establish a safe level of exposure.
“We need to admit that we may not know what the side effects of doing this, especially all at once, could be,” she said.
Increased vaccination also hasn’t delivered better health outcomes for U.S. children, according to Høeg. She cited the examples of the Hep B and meningococcal vaccines, which Denmark does not recommend for children, unlike the U.S. Yet, levels of hepatitis B and meningitis among children in the two countries are similar.
Høeg said U.S. health agencies should “avoid overmedicalizing childhood” and owe American children recommendations that are “based on data and not politics.”
Potential risks of post-vaccine aluminum accumulation ‘a warranted concern’
Dr. Evelyn Griffin, an OB/GYN and member of three ACIP work groups called for more research into the safety of aluminum-based adjuvants used in vaccines.
Griffin said aluminum salts are the most widely used adjuvant. Yet, the mechanisms underlying the use of aluminum salts in vaccines “are not fully understood.” She said only one peer-reviewed study has examined the effects of aluminum in infants’ blood following vaccination — but that study used a small sample and didn’t collect long-term data.
According to Griffin, current FDA aluminum exposure limits are increasingly questioned, as “appropriate testing was not performed.” She said recent studies have suggested that aluminum accumulation is “a warranted concern” and called for studies on the long-term impact of aluminum exposure and who is most at risk.
Griffin called on ACIP to determine how it can assess the safety and effectiveness of adjuvants in currently recommended vaccines for all ages, including studies regarding whether multiple aluminum-containing vaccines should be administered on the same day during early infancy.
In October, ACIP announced the creation of a new work group that will study the safety of aluminum adjuvants. ACIP did not hold a vote relating to the aluminum content of vaccines at today’s meeting.
Watch today’s ACIP meeting here:
VIDEO
Related articles in The Defender
CDC Vaccine Panel Votes to End Universal Hep B Vaccine for Newborns
Medical Establishment Mounts PR Blitz Amid Reports CDC Plans to Scrap Hep B Vaccine for Newborns
New CDC Work Group to Study Aluminum in Childhood Vaccines
CDC’s New Vaccine Advisers Vow to Study Cumulative Effect of Childhood Vaccine Schedule
Aluminum in Vaccines Far Exceeds ‘Safe’ Limits for Infants, Critics Say
.
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and host of "The Defender In-Depth" on CHD.TV.
"
Pro Vaxx Doctor Gets DESTROYED In Congressional Hearing
The Jimmy Dore Show
1.71M subscribers
Sep 12, 2025
"At recent congressional hearings on vaccines, Stanford infectious disease doctor Jake Scott testified that over 600 placebo-controlled studies support vaccine safety. Lawyer Aaron Siri rebutted Dr. Scott’s claims, however, arguing that nearly all of the cited trials were irrelevant to the childhood vaccine schedule, leaving virtually no true inert placebo studies.
Senator Ron Johnson then pressed Dr. Scott on mRNA vaccine technology, pointing out contradictions in his testimony about how long modified mRNA and lipid nanoparticles persist in the body. Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger conclude that Scott represents a broader pattern of establishment experts repeating talking points while independent critics expose weaknesses in vaccine trial evidence."
( I missed this one when it aired, and apologies if it was already posted, but it shouldn't be missed.)