Printable View
Covid Spike Proteins Found All Over CANCER Tumors
Kim Iversen
725K subscribers
Dec 6, 2025
( Dr. Soon-Shiong also reports that people who took the VAXX and whose cancers were long in remission are now finding cancer is back. He is currently the owner of the L.A. Times, so this news probably will indeed go viral. )
"Doctor Patrick Soon-Shiong has gone viral after issuing explosive warnings about child deaths linked to the COVID vaccine, and spike proteins found in cancer tumors."
Placing this here. It has come up over and over that on every front, our Institutions have failed to create "safety" and "effective" intervention for those aspects of life which CONCERN us. So, we should not TRUST. To ask how we can be encouraged to begin to TRUST (because this means we can keep the "Republic" intact) is a strange question to me bcause WHY would we ever TRUST what has become apparent as our deepest danger. We are in danger from those in "charge" and we cannot seem to get anything done to remove the threat. TRUST cannot be possible while we are at Threat.
In my own experience, I have been able to depend on a Source that lets me know EXACTLY what I need to do... refuse and repudiate any attempt to tell me I MUST comply AND be in TRUST only of this Source. WHOMEVER GETS THIS IS JUST NOT AS THREATENED BY ALL THE FORCES SEEKING ONE'S DESTRUCTION.
Quote:
John Leake: The Demonic Rituals to Replicate God and Mankind’s New Religion of Science
Dec 8,2025
Ritual piercing of the body. The shedding of blood. The promise of salvation. John Leake explains the religion of vaccines, and why its adherents are dangerous.
International Press Conference: Netherlands mRNA Bioweapons Case against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, et. al.
Mind Matters and Everything Else with Dr. Joseph Sansone
Dec 14, 2025
https://substack.com/home/post/p-181642465
"The legal team asked us to distribute this press invitation for the international press conference taking place in Netherlands in front of the court in Leeuwarden on Monday December 15, 2025, at 2PM. The Plaintiffs’ Attorney Peter Stassen will be speaking about important developments in the case.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...a_991x2559.png
Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism.
Mind Matters and Everything Else is 100% independent. "
This substack article contains some eye-opening research about the cause of many of the injuries that trace back to vaccine. Well worth reading through the entire article.
What Vaccine Injuries Reveal About the Root Causes of Disease
The zeta potential concept is foundational not only to vaccine injury but also health and longevity
A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
DEC 18, 2025
Story at a Glance:
•Vaccines often cause various side effects, making it hard to identify common causes—many of which overlap with other mysterious and “incurable” ailments.
•Neurologist Andrew Moulden discovered that vaccines frequently trigger microstrokes, which can lead to a myriad of acute and chronic diseases.
•Forgotten research from the 1960s shows that blood cell clumping is a root cause of many diseases—a belief also shared by Chinese Medicine.
•Colloidal chemistry and zeta potential science reveal that positive charges around blood cells cause clumping. Agents with concentrated positive charges, such as aluminum and the COVID spike protein, are especially problematic.
•Improving the physiologic zeta potential benefits a wide range of acute and chronic illnesses. A strong case can also be made that many conventional and holistic therapies work in part by enhancing zeta potential.
https://open.substack.com/pub/amidwe...s-reveal-about
Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla Ordered to Testify in Dutch COVID Vaccine Injury Lawsuit
by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
December 23, 2025
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...njury-lawsuit/
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...ne-800x417.jpg
"The court order relates to a lawsuit filed in 2023 by seven people injured by COVID-19 vaccines. One of the victims has since died. According to Dutch newspaper De Andere Krant, the lawsuit centers around the question 'of whether the COVID-19 injections are a bioweapon.'
Bill Gates and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla will have to appear in person in the Netherlands to testify at a hearing in a COVID-19 vaccine injury lawsuit, a Dutch court ruled late last month.
In addition to Gates and Bourla, the suit names 15 other defendants, including former Dutch prime minister and current NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the Dutch state, and several Dutch public health officials and journalists.
De Andere Krant said last month’s ruling “is a significant setback for the defendants, who are accused of misleading victims about the ‘safety and effectiveness’ of the vaccines.” However, it “remains to be seen” whether the defendants will comply with the court’s order and appear at next year’s hearing.
The defendants may face additional legal challenges in Dutch courts in the new year. A second lawsuit, filed in March by three COVID-19 vaccine injury victims in the Netherlands, presents a similar set of allegations and names the same defendants.
At a press conference last week, Dutch attorney Peter Stassen, who represents the vaccine-injured plaintiffs in both cases, earlier this month petitioned the courts in both cases to hear in-person testimony by five expert witnesses regarding the safety and efficacy of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
According to Stassen, oral hearings will be held in both cases next year, but hearing dates have not yet been scheduled. Stassen seeks to consolidate the cases.
The expert witnesses include:
Catherine Austin Fitts, founder and publisher of the Solari Report and former assistant secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Sasha Latypova, a former pharmaceutical research and development executive.
Joseph Sansone, Ph.D., a psychotherapist who is litigating to prohibit mRNA vaccines in Florida.
Katherine Watt, a researcher and paralegal.
Mike Yeadon, Ph.D., a pharmacologist and former vice president of Pfizer’s allergy and respiratory research unit.
Earlier this month, Stassen and the expert witnesses released a series of YouTube videos presenting their evidence and proposed testimony.
Plaintiffs ‘victims of people who unjustly suppress the truth’
Both lawsuits have taken a circuitous path in the Dutch court system.
In October 2024, the District Court of Leeuwarden rejected Gates’ motion to dismiss the case, ruling that it has jurisdiction over Gates and ordering Gates to pay the defendants’ legal fees.
In June 2025, the plaintiffs increased their claims against the defendants and petitioned the court to accept the expert witnesses’ testimony.
On Dec. 7, Stassen submitted written statements and the recorded video statements by the expert witnesses to the District Court of Leeuwarden.
The second lawsuit kicked off in March with an application for preliminary evidence proceedings. In August, the District Court of Leeuwarden denied the application, finding that the plaintiffs lacked standing to seek a preliminary hearing while attempting to join the 2023 lawsuit.
In September, Stassen filed an appeal, alleging that the court did not afford the plaintiffs a fair trial, in violation of the European Convention on Human Rights, and calling upon the court to allow the expert witnesses to testify in court.
During last week’s press conference, Stassen said the plaintiffs — and the broader public — “are victims of people who unjustly suppress the truth.”
“By suppressing the truth, my clients were misled. Had they not been misled, they would not have gotten the COVID-19 shot, a shot that the suppressors of the truth still tout as a safe and effective vaccine to this day,” Stassen said.
Expert witnesses: COVID shots ‘indistinguishable from bioweapons’
During the press conference, Stassen also noted his efforts to have the Dutch courts accept his expert witnesses’ in-person testimony. He said the witnesses intend to present evidence showing that the COVID-19 shots:
Are “indistinguishable from bioweapons.”
Offer “no health benefits whatsoever.”
Are “neither safe nor effective.”
Were released in the U.S. under emergency use authorization, “a legal status that removes the enforcement of the pharmaceutical law and consumer safeguards by the FDA,” or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Are “by design, intended to cause the damage described in the package insert and reports as ‘side effects’” — including, “sudden death, heart failure, cancer, and the most horrific diseases.”
Are a “key component” of the “Great Reset,” “a military project in which NATO plays a significant role.”
In their video statements, the experts questioned the safety of the COVID-19 shots and the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Sansone told The Defender that he and the other expert witnesses are advocating to testify in court, as this “can be more influential” than written testimony.
Sansone said he intends to provide evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines are bioweapons that violate the Biological Weapons Convention and the Biological Weapons and Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 — the latter authored by late University of Illinois law professor Francis Boyle, Ph.D., an expert witness in the original lawsuit who died in January.
“Governments, healthcare facilities and the media deliberately concealed this information from the public, showing clear criminal intent,” Sansone said in his video.
Latypova told The Defender the lawsuits are the only ones worldwide alleging that “COVID was not a public health event but a government ‘project’ that resulted in mass casualty that can be characterized as ‘genocide,’ or more broadly, ‘democide’ of the population.”
In her statement, Latypova alleged that “military governance and contracting were used to develop, procure, deliver, distribute these shots all over the world” — and to bypass standard regulatory oversight procedures for pharmaceutical products.
“There is substantial evidence of non-compliance with good manufacturing practices, which is the law that governs pharmaceutical purity and honesty in labeling all over the world,” Latypova said.
Watt said the vaccines were a component of a broader effort by political, military and pharmaceutical actors to deceive the public, using the pandemic as a pretext.
“Communicable disease and pandemic threats are political fabrications based on widespread use of intentionally deceptive diagnostic testing devices for the purposes of instilling public fear and justifying vaccination and biodefense programs,” she said.
According to Fitts, global central banks and financial institutions were involved in these efforts. She said the pandemic represented an “egregious misuse of healthcare policies to implement economic and political agendas” with the goal of engineering a “Great Reset” of the global financial system.
Yeadon said that since 2020, he has attempted to warn the public that the COVID-19 vaccines are designed to “lower the fertility [rate] and [people’s health] and reduce population.”
He said that even though he was censored on social media for making such comments, “this is what I have watched happen all around me for five years.”
Pfizer CEO sought to block expert witnesses, dismiss lawsuits
Stassen said that several of the defendants, including Bourla, Rutte and the Dutch state, sought to block the testimony of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses. Gates was the only defendant who “deferred to the court’s judgment on this point,” Stassen said.
In September, Gates and Bourla submitted written statements of defense.
In his statement, Gates said he does not have any connection to or influence over the policies of international bodies such as the World Health Organization, either personally or through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Bourla said the court “has been sufficiently informed and can dismiss the claims without the need to order an oral hearing.”
In a previous statement submitted to the District Court of Leeuwarden last year, Bourla denied that he was liable for the injuries and damages the plaintiffs sustained and maintained that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is “safe and effective.”
In June, another attorney for the plaintiffs, Arno van Kessel, was arrested “with considerable force,” as part of a nationwide sweep by Dutch police against alleged members of a “sovereign citizen” movement with a “potential intent to use violence” against the Dutch state. He remains confined in a high-security prison.
De Andere Krant reported that earlier this month, van Kessel’s pre-trial detention was extended until February, despite “a complete lack of convincing evidence.”
Related articles in The Defender
3 New Plaintiffs Ask to Join COVID Vaccine Injury Lawsuit Against Bill Gates
Judge Rules Bill Gates Must Face Vaccine-Injured in Netherlands Court
Bill Gates Investing Heavily in mRNA Technology — Are Taxpayers Helping Him?
Bill Gates — After Reaping Huge Profits Selling BioNTech Shares — Trashes Effectiveness of COVID Vaccines
Pfizer Vaccine Bonanza Slows — But Bill Gates Sold Early, Made Huge Profits
Court Orders Bill Gates, Indian Government to Respond to Lawsuit Filed by Family of Woman Who Died After AstraZeneca Vaccine
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and host of "The Defender In-Depth" on CHD.TV. "
The CDC’s Universal Infant HepB Vaccination Recommendation Is Unsupported by Safety Data
by Jeremy R. Hammond
Dec 19, 2025 |
https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2025/...y-safety-data/
(Many hyperlinks in the article, not embedded here)
"The hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine is making headlines lately because of the recommendation of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to delay the first dose of this aluminum-containing injection until after the age of two months.
That provoked outrage among the faithful adherents to the vaccine religion.
What the pro-pharma crowd won’t tell you is that when the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 1991 issued its recommendation that all newborn babies receive a three-dose series of the HepB vaccine starting on the day of birth, it was based on zero safety data from randomized, placebo-controlled trials.
I detail that in my freely downloadable e-book The New York Times vs. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: How the Mainstream Media Spread Vaccine Misinformation. You can read the relevant excerpt in my post “How the New York Times Lies about HepB Vaccine Safety”.
I’ve also written about this in a detailed article I wrote for Children’s Health Defense (CHD) that provides the disturbing true answer to the question “Why Does the CDC Recommend Hepatitis B Vaccination for Infants?”
(And just so you don’t have to wait in suspense, the answer is because they couldn’t achieve their target vaccination rate among adults at risk of the disease, i.e., sexually promiscuous individuals and intravenous drug users, so they figured that to achieve that policy goal they’d just indiscriminately vaccinate everyone at birth.)
As I note in that CHD article, infants whose mothers are not carriers are at very low risk from the virus, and routine screening is done during pregnancy to determine the risk.
Hence the recommendation puts most infants at unnecessary risk of harm from the vaccine.
Here’s a four-minute summary version of my CHD article: “How CDC’s HepB Vaccine Recommendation Endangers Children’s Health”.
Much more at the link: https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2025/...y-safety-data/ "
Doctors Will No Longer Receive Financial Rewards for Vaccinating Kids
by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
January 5, 2026
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...ting-kids-cms/
(Podcast at the link. Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)
"The federal government will stop paying physicians based on the number of patients they vaccinate, and is urging state health agencies to stop using similar financial incentives.
In a Dec. 30, 2025, memo to state health officials, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) said it “does not tie payment to performance on immunization quality measures in Medicaid and CHIP at the federal level.”
Under the new policies, CMS will no longer require states to report how many children are vaccinated, but states may continue to voluntarily provide the data.
CMS stated it will explore options to more strongly encourage informed consent before vaccination and “will also explore how religious exemptions for vaccinations can be accounted for in the data and the subsequent measures.”
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. welcomed the new policy in a post on X, stating that it protects medical freedom and informed consent.
https://x.com/SecKennedy/status/2006...ng-kids-cms%2F
“This directional change coming from CMS is welcome,” said Mary Holland, CEO of Children’s Health Defense. “It helps to put vaccines back into the category of every other medical intervention, which is where they should be.”Quote:
Secretary Kennedy
@SecKennedy
Thank you,
@robbystarbuck
for bringing attention to this update.
Government bureaucracies should never coerce doctors or families into accepting vaccines or penalize physicians for respecting patient choice. That practice ends now.
Under the Trump administration, HHS will protect informed consent, respect religious liberty, and uphold medical freedom.
Thank you
@DrOzCMS
+
@CMSGov
for your leadership on this issue.
Quote
Robby Starbuck
@robbystarbuck
Dec 31, 2025
Big change announcement for 2026: Doctors will no longer be financially punished if patients decline vaccines, including for religious reasons.
@SecKennedy + @CMSGov’s new directive says Medicaid & CHIP payments will no longer be tied to prenatal and childhood vaccine numbers.
Show more
1:57 PM · Dec 31, 2025
462.2K Views
Writing on Substack, research scientist and author James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., called CMS’s new policy “the most consequential federal policy reversal on pediatric vaccine incentives” in recent years and “the beginning of a long-overdue rebalancing.”
Pediatrician Dr. Michelle Perro said the new policy restores ethics and trust in the practice of vaccinating children.
“Any time a clinician’s compensation is tied to a specific medical decision, especially one involving children, families reasonably ask, ‘Is this recommendation for my child, or for a metric?’ Even the appearance of a conflict can erode trust, and trust is the foundation of pediatric care and informed consent,” Perro said.
‘Financial incentives distort medical judgment’
Writing for the Gold Report, journalist Yudi Sherman of America’s Frontline News said the system of financial incentives tied to physicians’ vaccination rates “has long been controversial” and has adversely affected pediatric practice.
“Parents have complained for years that financial incentives distort medical judgment, leading to high-pressure tactics around childhood vaccinations. Some say doctors push shots parents believe are unnecessary or unsafe. Others report being dismissed from pediatric practices altogether if they decline vaccines,” Sherman wrote.
According to Sherman, the system of financial incentives for vaccinating children “could be surprisingly lucrative.” She cited CMS data showing that the agency paid physicians about $45 for each dose of the COVID-19 vaccine administered to a child through Medicare.
“Administer the shot at home, and that came with another $40. All told, a doctor could earn around $85 for a single COVID-19 shot, with the shot itself supplied at no cost by the federal government,” Sherman wrote.
“Roughly half of doctors” are beneficiaries of these incentives, “known as value-based contracts.” “They reward physicians with lump-sum payments for hitting specific metrics, such as vaccination rates. Because those rates are calculated as percentages, doctors who want to keep their numbers high sometimes avoid seeing unvaccinated children altogether.”
Pressure on physicians to accept such financial incentives is strong, according to a 2021 paper co-authored by Lyons-Weiler and Dr. Paul Thomas, published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
According to Lyons-Weiler, that paper, based on a 30-day billing analysis at a large pediatric practice in Oregon, “where informed consent is genuinely respected,” showed that “refusal of CDC-scheduled vaccines by patients resulted in projected annual losses exceeding one million dollars in one practice — primarily from forgone administrative fees.”
“This was not hypothetical. It was a documented, measurable penalty for practicing medicine with integrity,” Lyons-Weiler wrote.
According to Dr. Meryl Nass, founder of Door to Freedom and a former internist, pediatricians often rely on these financial incentives to supplement their income, even though these incentives damage the doctor-patient relationship by prioritizing the needs of insurance companies and the government.
“I have been told that pediatricians rely on vaccine payments and bonuses to stay in the black,” Nass said. “Pediatricians are supposed to be the lowest paid of all doctors. This will eventually have a huge impact on the practice of pediatrics.”
Retired pediatrician Dr. Samara Cardenas said pediatricians receive financial incentives not just from federal and state government sources, but also from insurers. According to Cardenas, the incentives are designed to increase childhood vaccination rates.
“It has been since the late 90s, when HMOs were founded. They started doing that because they really wanted to get the patients vaccinated … so there was always a monetary incentive for doctors to do it because they get paid so little,” Cardenas said.
According to figures from Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families, approximately 40% of U.S. children are covered by Medicaid. Cardenas said doctors who treat Medicaid patients “get paid a good amount for doing vaccinations” — approximately “25 cents on a dollar.”
“It doesn’t look like a lot, but when you have 2,000 patients and you do all your vaccinations, you get a good amount of money,” Cardenas said.
Covid Index: The world's largest directory of censored science & suppressed evidence on COVID-19. Learn More!
Covid Index
Cash incentives to vaccinate kids contributed to chronic disease epidemic
Tying payment to vaccination rates can harm pediatrics in several predictable ways, Perro said.
It can distort the clinical conversation by bypassing shared decision-making between physicians, patients and their families. It erodes trust in pediatric guidance more broadly. And it creates an administrative burden for pediatric practices that have to complete the paperwork required to receive reimbursements.
Perro added that pediatricians who opt out of these incentives face a “competitive disadvantage” compared to pediatricians who accept such incentives.
Holland said the incentives have contributed to the growing childhood chronic disease epidemic in the U.S.
“These perverse financial incentives to vaccinate children have warped the practice of medicine, putting bonus payments for meeting arbitrary thresholds over an individual child’s health,” Holland said. “We have seen the damage with an exceptional rate of childhood chronic disease.”
States would still be allowed to provide their own financial incentives to doctors. Internal medicine physician Dr. Clayton Baker said it is likely that “states with predominantly Democrat state politics and deeply Pharma–captured medical establishments” will ignore CMS by continuing to incentivize pediatricians.
However, “this change by CMS may … provide medical freedom-minded states greater impetus to stop this practice altogether within their jurisdiction,” Baker said.
Cardenas said pediatricians have a responsibility to provide quality care despite the elimination of federal financial incentives for vaccinating children.
“The good doctors will do a good job regardless of money,” Cardenas said.
Related articles in The Defender
‘Informed Consent Is Back’: New COVID Vaccine Recommendations Give Families More Say
‘I Will Not Do Harm’: Pediatrician Suing CDC Explains Decision Not to Give COVID Vaccines to Kids
CHD Funds Lawsuit Against CDC Over Program That Forces Pediatricians to Give COVID Vaccines to Kids on Medicaid
MAHA Commission Outlines Sweeping Agenda to Target Chronic Disease
‘True Corruption’: Agency Capture Responsible for Chronic Disease Epidemic in U.S.
‘Dangerous Games’: States Defy Federal Agencies, Create Their Own COVID Vaccine Rules
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and host of "The Defender In-Depth" on CHD.TV. "