Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
The five stages of grief:
Denial
Anger
Bargaining
Depression
Paying in Rubles
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
- Ships Held Captive In Kherson Ukraine Port. See How
In Russian Controlled Kherson Region Ukraine there are many civilian ships that can not leave to the Black sea. In this report The captain of a Turkish ship in the port and Russian Soldiers explain why they can not leave the port and go to the Black sea. This is a must see. Watch until the end
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Quote:
Posted by
kfm27917
The five stages of grief:
Denial
Anger
Bargaining
Depression
Paying in Rubles
Verrry funny.
Especially when we consider that it is a stable currency. Why, maybe our employers can start paying our salaries in rubles!
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Quote:
Posted by
Mashika
Burning temples, synagogues, churches is diabolic. (The Notre-Dame in Paris!) They are the ultimate refuges, where souls yield to the realisation that protection is only guaranteed by their purity when facing the divine. Making that impossible is like locking them all up in the crematorium. Which is being done. Come, little ones, the Witch will turn you into (Soylent green) cookies!
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Remember in the Matrix movie how the Sentinels would go around looking for people to kill? That's probably how this guy felt when he noticed the drone
https://t.me/ZradaXXII/4913
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Good thing they chose to be soldiers and not singers :o:Music::p:ROFL:
https://t.me/ZradaXXII/4917
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Quote:
Posted by
Mashika
Great to hear them singing the and closing with “Allahu akbar”. Unknown in the West is the true meaning of this statement.
“Allah” is (and that is also mostly unknown to the average Muslim when he does not know sufism very well) what is called in Arabic grammar an “intensive”. In Indo-European languages (English, Welsh, French, Russian) one has "fast, faster, fastest”, the last two forms being a comparative and a superlative. In Arabic however, one has a comparative and an intensive: the comparative being as in Indo-European languages but the "intensive" meaning something like "intensely" displaying the quality considered – which would be then: fast, faster, intensely fast.
However, the form does not exist for every adjective, and rarely for an adjective/noun. The Arabic for "divinity" being ilâha, its "intensive" is allâh. The meaning of the word "Allâh" is then “the Intensely Divine (one)”. Which implies, in a way, that there are less intensely divines ones. But the Muslim declaration of faith says: lâ ilâha ilâ Allâh, which literally means: "there is no divinity unless the Intensely Divine (one)”, which, consequently, is a paradoxical formulation. (To be compared maybe with the Christian "I believe because it is absurd” (credo quia absurdum): only paradoxes being somehow able to "express" what is meant.)
Akbar then is the comparative of kabîr (great): "greater". Allâhu akbar: “the Intensely Divine is greater” —— meaning:: "than any human endeavour. In battle it means that battle as an expression of hubris is sinful, because the Intensely Divine will always be greater than human pettiness. It also means that we cannot judge other people: it is Allah’s privilege to judge because only the Intensely Divine knows everything occurring in the human soul; he/she/it is greater (than human pretence).
That those men combine Katyusha with Allah akbar, understanding how those two human utterances do not contradict each other, may make us understand what motivates their bravery.
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Some opinions I've seen posted that I'm finding hard to pick holes in.
- Russia have been holding back in Ukraine for an eventual confrontation with NATO and its partners.
- One of the main purposes of the operation is to give Russian troops combat experience in a controlled manner. In spite of MSM propaganda, casualties have been minimal and the campaign has been precise and deadly. Russian troops are quickly learning more about warfare than decades of American/NATO teaching can accomplish.
- Ukraine are a NATO proxy who are both trained and armed by NATO. In effect, they are real life practice for how to fight against a NATO army. And it's been proven that even bog standard Russian equipment and tactics are more than enough.
- Russia's use of tanks and infantry while holding back on bombing the objective first shows a limited warfare type. Conversely the US drops bombs from long range then sends troops in. This seems much more like a type of live fire extended experience especially for field officers and NCOs.
- Not only are they giving their troops some of the best experience of fighting a near-peer (but inferior) armed force, NATO is also playing into their hands by sending equipment, thereby giving Russians even better experience of fighting against NATO gear, AND captured equipment can be reverse engineered so that direct counters can be made. Russia has not sent any of its advanced weaponry to Ukraine at all meaning that NATO still doesn't understand Russian capability.
- Only now has Western media come around to claiming the outlook for Ukraine is looking grim.
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Concerning the dogfight example, the Zero was eventually outmaneuvered by the Ford Mustang P-51, but not out of the factory. In the theater, they figured out how to pump some water into the venturi, and voila.
Concerning the Peshmerga, that can hardly compare to anything, since it is its own ancient defense force without a nation. The lack of a Kurdistan in the empire partitions is not an accident. As of today, yes, Kurds overall have been factionalized so that some of them do work in questionable agencies such as SDF. Mainly it appears that Israel--->backs Kurdish separatism, Turkey--->probably would not let their culture continue if they could get away with it.
Wahhabism as such is a British construct to assist with the Suez Canal.
Quote:
Posted by
Mashika
What most people are unaware of, is that the Mensheviks are now back in control of Russia, after almost one century of 'not existing'. But figure this out, they are not the same as they used to be, and no one seems to remember they existed in the first place. The Russian empire is not a thing of the past, truly, and people around today are still part of the families who were around when the Russian empire was still a thing, you just wait and then wait a bit more and then things, like everything else in life, comes back around one more time :D
I remember them.
It is easy because they are...semi-mixed with the non-country, but, much older term Belarus:
The term Belorussia (Russian: Белору́ссия, the latter part similar but spelled and stressed differently from Росси́я, Russia) first rose in the days of the Russian Empire, and the Russian Tsar was usually styled "the Tsar of All the Russias", as Russia or the Russian Empire was formed by three parts of Russia—the Great, Little, and White. This asserted that the territories are all Russian and all the peoples are also Russian; in the case of the Belarusians, they were variants of the Russian people.
After the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, the term White Russia caused some confusion, as it was also the name of the military force that opposed the red Bolsheviks. During the period of the Byelorussian SSR, the term Byelorussia was embraced as part of a national consciousness.
The Belarusian People's Republic was the first attempt to create an independent Belarusian state under the name "Belarus". Despite significant efforts, the state ceased to exist, primarily because the territory was continually dominated by the German Imperial Army and the Imperial Russian Army in World War I, and then the Bolshevik Red Army. It existed from only 1918 to 1919 but created prerequisites for the formation of a Belarusian state. The choice of name was probably based on the fact that core members of the newly formed government were educated in tsarist universities, with corresponding emphasis on the ideology of West-Russianism.
So it could not really have been...exactly the same as the White Army...but similar perhaps?
Quote:
The west doesn't understand patience, or a calmed, slow pacing heart and will, they require immediate compensation and relieve for their heart ache.
Generally true. But I do. Which of course is why I don't fit in or agree with anything.
As an example of these differences, there was a longish Grayzone article which reads like an ongoing soap opera of spit. It is about the "installation" of the current "western side", which was indeed very dear to a certain cadre. And it goes on about them bleating how they penetrate and influence other groups. It doesn't really mention any crimes, it is just the way they talk is a bit disgusting. A lot of it is not real, like of course when they say "kill" it is not literal, and neither was it when they claim to have accomplished a coup in the UK. They really wanted to get rid of Theresa May and her Brexit plan, and the all-important monolithic goal seems to be summarized by:
In another email, dated 23 December 2018, Prins sought to recruit Henry Kissinger to push a hard Brexit, warning that May’s version of Brexit would leave the UK “bound as a third country to agreements which we will not be able to change and which will cut across our NATO commitments and very close bilateral links with the US”.
Commenting on The Grayzone article in a post on Telegram on Saturday, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova asked followers what they thought about the alleged plot. “What do you think? Does this type of change of power constitute a coup or intrigue? I think it’s both. This is a purely English tradition, like poisoning”, she quipped.
I think she might have recognized it there. "English tradition". Hrm. So these guys are sitting around with white knuckles and clenched teeth about NATO and the US. Apparently, "English tradition" does not concern the English people--that is MI6 at work. And what they mainly care about must be the U. S. State Department.
As far as what everything will be won right now with:
MOSCOW, June 4. /TASS/. Russian Defense Ministry Spokesman Igor Konashenkov on Saturday said Russia’s high-precision air-launched missiles struck a Ukrainian artillery training center with foreign instructors outside Sumy, 27 clusters of troops and ammunition and two command posts.
"High-precision air-launched missiles struck a Ukrainian artillery training center with foreign instructors in the area of the Stetsovka settlement of the Sumy Region," he said. The spokesman said foreign instructors used the center to tarin Ukrainians on using operating 155-mm M777 Howitzers.
Konashenkov said a foreign mercenary based was destroyed by a missile strike in the Dachnoye district of the Odessa region.
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Quote:
Posted by
happyuk
Some opinions I've seen posted that I'm finding hard to pick holes in.
[*]Russia have been holding back in Ukraine for an eventual confrontation with NATO and its partners.
Well we have to keep in mind it is a Special Military Operation, whereas a larger force would require a Declaration of War. It is questionable if that would have been popular when the operation started. By now, it probably has enough public support that it could be done without the government collapsing. Just in itself, that is not a reason to do it.
When considering the points of brinksmanship, it means that no NATO force would be particularly eager for a hostile encounter. Whatever others may think, most of the commanders have known this as a cold fact for years. This of course does not mean that politicians will not want to show a "credible threat", but, let's try to keep in mind that none of their ideas actually work.
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
An interesting and compelling 8 minute argument from Gonzalo Lira that Russia will never sign a peace deal until they have control of all of Ukraine.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ru18yg-0Epo
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
- Biden ADMITS Ukraine Will Have To Cede Territory To Russia:
The idea that the Ukraine War will only end with a negotiated settlement involving the ceding of territory has been widely criticized as “appeasement,” yet that is precisely what is inevitably going to happen to bring the war to an end. Even Joe Biden tacitly admitted as much when asked by a reporter recently. So when will the rest of the “dependent media” come around and acknowledge this obvious truth?
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Russia Repulses Ukraine Counterattacks, West Reporters Speak of Crisis for Kiev in Donbass
26 minute update
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CCX0xRyX_QI
https://twitter.com/spriteer_774400/...78541929046018
