Re: The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis - The most complete picture for today!
Your questions would best be directed to Ben Davidson of SuspiciousObservers youtube channel.
He does public Q&A sessions fairly regularly, and appreciates questions from sincere and well-informed individuals.
Or you could try emailing him at https://observerranch.com/contact/ ...
...or various other channels through which he can be reached, or offers information such as:
I would advise, if you email him, to let him know you are a member of Project Avalon Forum, as he is aware he has appreciative followers of his information here, but also that he is very busy, so you may have to be patient for an answer.
Quote:
Posted by
apollobeatz
Well, the geomagnetic pole reversal wouldn't cause the YD-Boundary layer (YDB) found 2007, that dates back to 12 thousand years, would it? What you think?
It wouldn't cause the deserts to appear out of nowhere, like Sahara, Arabian desert and Taklamakan...
Some floodings all over the place it could do, here I will agree with you, but surely not with the things above.
Again, if it turns out that the Himalayas are just about 12 thousand years old, like the newest datings of the lake Baikal, then my theory turns out to be right, in regard of the events that happened 12 thousand years ago!
In other cases and dates in history, your research might be the most accurate.
Re: The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis - The most complete picture for today!
Quote:
Posted by
onawah
Your questions would best be directed to Ben Davidson of SuspiciousObservers youtube channel.
He does public Q&A sessions fairly regularly, and appreciates questions from sincere and well-informed individuals.
Or you could try emailing him at
https://observerranch.com/contact/ ...
...or various other channels through which he can be reached, or offers information such as:
That looks somewhat confusing to me, as I get all these links but no quick answer here. If we want a discussion here, please clarify your point of view for me and all. Your point is that 12 thousand years ago, it was only the geomagnetic pole reversal that ended the ice age? It was no comet event, but with all the resulting consequences we know and talk about in this topic of discussion, right? All that happened due to a geomagnetic pole reversal, including the earth's crust shift, did I understand you right?
If so, I still got my research about the Himalayas, the deformation of Eurasia, lake Baikal, the Mariana Trench, the biggest deserts on our planet, that all together I date to 12 thousand years! Sure, that goes against the academic datings, except the newest dating of the lake Baikal, but I got some arguments, about Wegerner's continental drift theory being (not entirely) wrong, which is used for these datings, specially with the India collision, which is the most obvious and impossible thing. Later in topic I would like to discuss the precise GPS satellite data we got on this, that India like all other continents still move in their directions and so on... Sure, there is movement, on a solid Earth with continental drift, and on an expanding Earth with its expansion, so what model will be more precise for that? You see, math is so universal, that it works almost on any model, by ignoring a few things, if they are already known. So the math worked just fine on a geocentric model back then, and was same precise as today with the heliocentric model, but one model was wrong, and didn't explain all the things we discovered with time.
And I would discuss and doubt "NASA's" proof that the Earth isn't expanding - https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-r...rld-after-all/
That whole research has actually nothing to do with NASA, but one chinese professor out of a Californian University who led his group of a few people, to process various satellite data, including GPS ones. And their official result contains very suspicious results that indicate that there went something wrong. I saw their officially published papers by myself, and listened to other scientists debunking it.
Yea, I go the hard way, against many things that science presents to us as verified and granted. But there are also many ways to get some minor proves here and there, that will change our view on our planet.
Still, where does the YDB-layer come from, if not an asteroid/comet impact on Earth 12 thousand years ago? ))
Re: The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis - The most complete picture for today!
As stated, comet impacts also occur, of course, and cause great damage but don't fully explain all the damage that the micronova events create.
And as stated, best to direct your questions to Ben Davidson or just watch the playlists on his youtube channel, which are quite thorough.
Re: The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis - The most complete picture for today!
This is kind of all over the place. I am having a hard time following it.
I am going to try to extract some points. The reason is that post-Ice Age, there is more ability to track migrations and the onset of human works. It is relevant and informative to the shape of today. In the other direction, pre-Ice Age, nothing really.
"Younger Dryas" refers to a period of about a 1,000 years, when the Ice Age had been vanishing, but, then, particularly in the northern hemisphere, temperatures dropped abruptly.
Here are things that have been aimed at this time:
Quote:
Posted by
apollobeatz
the Himalayas, the deformation of Eurasia, lake Baikal, the Mariana Trench, the biggest deserts on our planet, that all together I date to 12 thousand years!
Quote:
Still, where does the YDB-layer come from, if not an asteroid/comet impact on Earth 12 thousand years ago? ))
Quote:
1 - The unusual impact crater in China under the Taklamakan desert, 2 - Earth's crust displacement that followed and ended the ice age, 3 - The floodings all over the world, that wiped out the mammoths, caused the permafrost regions, and sank civilisations like Atlantis...
A "pole reversal" is another contender.
All of this is based on Tectonic Plate Drift.
Because I question plate drift, then, I would have to parse out how any of these phenomena may be possible.
It tends to be a lot of work for one thing at a time. This is difficult.
Re: The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis - The most complete picture for today!
It's the planet's magnetic field that holds the plates in place, but during the 12,000 year solar cycle the poles reverse and the magnetic field diminishes to the point where the plates finally move very abruptly, so huge tsunamis are the result, lots of space dust and debris fall to Earth, and areas which were once arctic become warm and vice versa.
"Fire from the Sky" spoken of in various prophecies and records is from the recurring micronovas, part of the same cycle.
Once again, I advise watching the playlists on the SuspiciousObservers site, which are quite thorough. See:
https://www.youtube.com/@Suspicious0bservers/playlists
There are also books and pdfs.See:https://observerranch.podia.com/
