Robert O. Dean Interview

In answer to waves, I once expressed puzzlement at Bob Dean’s enthusiastic endorsement of his dear friend Zecharia Sitchin, who is widely seen to have been spreading a certain amount of disinformation. One difficulty was that, despite Sitchin’s consulting an astronomer brother of his, his scenario of a large planet entering the inner solar system is a challenge to astrophysical theory, which is adamant that such an object would not make it past Jupiter. Today I can answer my own query to my own satisfaction. The following is about Zecharia Sitchin, but it applies equally to his friend Bob Dean by association.

Sitchin was always bound to come under Annunaki influence in deciphering (even correctly) the Sumerian tablets, if only because they are based on information received from those Annunaki, who had several valid reasons that I can think of for being somewhat economical with the truth. History, they say, is written by the winners and I would suggest they needed to appear as winners (in control) at a time when there were actually nothing but losers. Let me explain.

In this post and the following one, I look at David Talbott’s seemingly preposterous theory that Saturn, Venus and Mars were at one time stacked above the Earth’s North Pole. It is a preposterous theory insofar as we fail to see how we got from that situation to our present configuration with those planets now so spread out. It is only seemingly preposterous because it has a considerable amount of hard evidence to back it up, both archaeological (including ancient texts) and scientific (the electric universe theory, which made several correct predictions about the nature of comets). So the preposterous aspect needs eliminating. My deduction is that the independent system of Saturn and its moons Venus, Earth and Mars entered the solar system from outside. As expected, Saturn was stopped in its tracks by Jupiter; but the smaller moons (and future planets) sailed on past Jupiter and together pulled an existing planet apart before settling into their respective orbits. So this is basically a one-off version of Sitchin’s scenario consistent with the laws of physics, where Nibiru is Saturn and Earth is its moon.

This would be the initial ‘Fall’, a cosmic catastrophe where no one perpetrates anything ‘evil’ but everyone reacts to the best of their abilities to something that is far too big to handle. This includes the Saturnians, who on losing their moons after timeless eons joined at the hip would likely seek to provide a reassuring presence, i.e. explaining away their short visits and lengthy absences. Hence the model would be one of a family that is highly dysfunctional through no fault of its individual members, who are only doing their best, but rather due to external circumstances.

Peeling this onion, some of Bob Dean’s ‘friends in high places’ may be Annunaki/Saturnians, but others, such as the ones who pulled him out of a forty-foot deep canal, were surely higher beings. While he mentions beings from other stars and other dimensions, we also have, closer to home, beings on altogether another level: planetary beings, stellar beings. Mythology for example confuses humanoid gods with planetary gods. This can be viewed from two opposite angles. You can either cash in on this tendency and pass off as a god for lower life forms; this leads to copycat humans seeing themselves misbehaving as a reflection of gods misbehaving. Alternatively you can see the planetary gods as being themselves buffeted by adverse external circumstances and in fact doing their best, just like us, which may not be terribly well. So, not only do people bite off as much as they can chew, and sometimes more, but planets wander into solar systems, and entire galaxies can wander into they know not what.

This is a universe of exploration and discovery, which can be harrowing and traumatic. Whether it appears benevolent or malevolent depends entirely on how we think we are coping. None of us are godlike perfect or fully in control, as children eventually learn about their parents. We can only try and be nice to each other, see the best in everyone. The trouble is, it’s too corny for words; but that should not stop us. If there is one person who seems to have got the hang of this simple expedient, it has to be Bob Dean.

Giving us something to think about, as usual, Araucaria!

Quote:

---

Posted by araucaria

This is a universe of exploration and discovery, which can be harrowing and traumatic. Whether it appears benevolent or malevolent depends entirely on how we think we are coping. None of us are godlike perfect or fully in control, as children eventually learn about their parents. We can only try and be nice to each other, see the best in everyone. The trouble is, it’s too corny for words; but that should not stop us. If there is one person who seems to have got the hang of this simple expedient, it has to be Bob Dean.

---

Wonderfully said, and I agree wholeheartedly.

I love Bob Dean as much as the next person (really enjoyed his Camelot interviews). However, when someone says they once knew Jesus in a past life...I become a tad skeptic. Just sayin'....

Dave - Toronto

Well, I'm a tad sceptical about the 6 weeks with ET. I mean that's a long time if experienced as such despite being only away for a short time. You'd gather or glean a lot of data in that time. Ask lots of questions about them, about ETs generally, about the Galactic Federation (if there is one), good and bad ETs and about our own history or pre-history, history of this planet if you will. I dunno. Did I miss it? That can't be covered by military oaths or anything.