Title: Falun Gong (English version, 6th ed.)
Author: Li Hongzhi
http://en.falundafa.org/eng/pdf/flg_2014.pdf
Printable View
Title: Falun Gong (English version, 6th ed.)
Author: Li Hongzhi
http://en.falundafa.org/eng/pdf/flg_2014.pdf
Link seems dead; use my signature instead.
From Bill: If that doesn't work, there's a copy here:
http://projectavalon.net/Thiaoouba_Prophecy.pdf
I believe this (below) is a better copy.
Better twice than not at all!
http://projectavalon.net/Who_Built_The_Moon.pdf
http://projectavalon.net/Who_Built_The_Moon_cover.jpg
If you liked the Bernie book and have a kindle, this book is free for a couple of days.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00N71YJQU
Does anyone have ' a soul remembers hiroshima ' by dolores cannon??
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...4,203,200_.jpg
http://projectavalon.net/The_Populat...ul_Ehrlich.pdf
(My thanks to Atlas for finding this. I'd been looking for a copy for some time.)
What a great resource thread!
I'm looking for the book "Winged Pharaoh" by Joan Grant. If anyone knows where there might be a free PDF copy online please let me know!
http://www.aucott.com/shop_image/product/41430.JPG
They Knew Too Much About Flying Saucers (PDF 8.5Mb)
.
Messengers of Deception by Jacques Vallee:
http://projectavalon.net/Jacques_Val..._Deception.pdf
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51MuvwcMxpL.jpg
O.K., so earlier today I tried in vein to find a Jim Marrs book, free online, so that I could copy some text for a comment here on the forum.
Every time I "searched-termed" the key words: "Jim Marrs - The Rise Of The Forth Reich". I got nothing on this thread. I was unable to find a complete free copy online anywhere.
I have a hard copy of the book in question, so I had to transcribe the text I wanted to use in my comment.
How does one search this thread for specific books? It appears as though one would have to go through each page, comment-by-comment. There's no index.
Very interesting and good thought out conclusion, well worth an excerpt:
Jacques Valle : Messengers of Deception (1979-2008), pp. 249-251
Quote:
The writing of this book has not been an easy task. In fact it was outright difficult and painful. Few of the facts I have had to state in these pages were to my liking. They shocked earlier theories of mine, destroyed my accepted and familiar thoughts. They were not designed to win any new friends. Pondering the reports and the theories, I kept thinking, "Should science have something to say about this ? If it doesn't, then what is science good for?"
Science with a big 'S' is a complex system, when you look at it from the inside. Linear accelerators that stretch for miles, computing clusters as big as a supermarket, research centers the size of a city: the mind can easily be impressed by the dimensions of modern technology. As a professional scientist, I have driven telescopes inside their larges domes in mountaintops, and I have operated computers in a radar factory. I have walked through immense wind tunnels, and I have found my way in the streets of atomic cities, in Oak Ridge and Brookhaven. None of this helps me when I try to understand the motivations of the contactees : science doesn't come to my aid any more. I am outside the domain where equations rules a logical set of processes. I can't look at all this from the inside.
Consider science from the outside: it is a machine for turning out knowledge. It has worked extremely well for a while. It has given us aircraft, television, and trips to the Moon. On the other hand, there are situations in which it is useless, because it assumes that the phenomena that are fed into it are natural and spontaneous. If something bigger or smarter that the ordinary human mind is around, if some clever deceivers use it to feed us phenomena that have been designed to fool us by Machiavellian spies or benevolent masters, then a "scientific" investigation will be useless. How can we find out whether or not anomalous phenomena can be dealt with in scientific terms?
At the end of antiquity, people where fed up with science. The Greeks knew the Earth was a globe. They knew how big it was and how far it was from the Sun, and knew the diameter of the Moon. They could compute the date of future eclipses. They even understood the atomic structure of matter. But they couldn't tell what the human race was doing here, and where it would next go. So their science was swept away and forgotten. Will the same thing happen to our science? Is this what UFO's mean? Scientists may be in the same position with UFO's as they are with crime: every police department has a criminology lab, but it is the detective who finds the criminal, not the technician. WHERE ARE THE UFO DETECTIVES?
The public has two usual positions on UFO's, either "It's all nonsense", or "We are visited by creatures from another planet." Until today, the first position has been the stronger one. A majority of the public and practically every scientist has long thought that UFO's were nonsense – and that is why there are no UFO detectives. Now things are changing. So many people have seen strange phenomena that a new belief has been born. Scientific opinion cannot stop this shifting of power. Unfortunately, once disturbed from its comfortable position of rest, the public will shift to the other extreme and start believing in space visitations. The is unavoidable. It is so reassuring to have other forms of life come here! They may be horrible to behold, but at least "they" know about us, "they" care about us, and "they" have gone to the trouble of coming here to see what we look like! In the naive words of a New York Times science editor, "We are not Alone!"
There is another system. It is sending us messengers of deception. They are not necessarily coming from nearby stars. In terms of effects on us, it doesn't matter where they come from. I even suspect that "where" and "when" have no meaning here. How could we be alone? The black box of science has stopped ticking. People look up toward the stars in eager expectation.
Receiving a visit from outer space sounds as comfortable as having a God. Yet we shouldn't rejoice too soon. Perhaps we will get the visitors we deserve.
How the sun is said to be slain; an excerpt (p.84) from Robert Hewitt Brown`s book Stellar Theology and Masonic Astronomy (1882):
Quote:
True meaning of the legend of Hiram, as illustrated by the allegory of the death of the sun.
Q. Explain more fully in what manner the sun is said by an astronomical allegory to be slain.
A. According to all the ancient astronomical legends, the sun is said to be slain by the three autumnal months -September, October, and November, represented as assaulting him in succesion.
Q. When is the sun said to be slaid?
A. Near the completion of the temple, as before explained.
Q. Explain more fully by whom, and how the sun is said to be slain.
A. The sun is slain by September, October, and November, or the three autumnal signs whom he encounters in succesion in his passage around the zodiac toward the winter solstice, or «southern gate of the zodiac»; so called in the poetical language of the old Greeks, because at that point the sun has reached his lowest southern declination.
The summer sun, glowing with light and heat as he reaches the autumnal equinox, enters Libra on the 21st of September. All through that month, and until the 21st of October, he declines in light and heat, but emerges from Libra without any serious harm from the attack of September. The assault of October is far more serious; and the sun when he leaves the venomous sign of Scorpion on the 21st of November, is deprived of the greater part of his power and shorn of more than half his glory. He continues his way toward the southern tropic, and in November ecounters the deadly dart of Sagittarius, which proves fatal; for when the sun leaves the third autumnal sign, on the 23rd of December, he lies dead at the winter solstice.
Q. Why is the third attack, or that of November, said to be more fatal than that of September or October?
A. Because when the sun emerges from under the dominion of Sagittarius, the ruling sign of November, on the 23rd of December, he enters Capricorn, and reaches his lowest declination. That is the shortest day of the year.
In June, at the summer solstice, the bright and glorious days were over fifteen hours long. Now the pale sun rises above the gloomy horizon of December but a little more than half as long, and his feeble rays can hardly penetrate the dark and stormy clouds that obscure the sky. The sun now seems to be quite overcome by «the sharpness of the winter of death.» Amid the universal mortality that reigns in the vegetable kingdom, the sun, deprived of light, heat, and power, appears dead also.
Q. Does the ancient art of astrology throw any further light upon this subject?
A. This science was much cultivated by the ancients under the name of the «divine art». According to the teachings of astrology, Capricorn was the «house of Saturn», the most evil and wicked in his influence of all the planets. He is called the «great infortune» and all that part of the zodiac within the signs of Capricornus and Aquarius was under his dominion. Saturn was also known as Kronos, or Time, which destroy all things; and in the poetical and allegorical language of mythology, devours even his own children. The figure of Saturn with his scythe is to this day an emblem of decay and death. The sun, therefore, when entered Capricorn, passed into the house and under the dominion of Saturn, or death.