After over five decades of defining the World Economic Forum’s mission and global influence, Klaus Schwab has officially stepped down as Chairman of the Board of Trustees, citing his age as he enters his 88th year. In the statement announcing his departure, Schwab made no reference to the investigation currently underway into his alleged misuse of WEF funds
At a special Board meeting on April 20, the Board unanimously appointed Vice Chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe as interim Chair and formed a Search Committee to identify a permanent successor. Brabeck-Letmathe is a former CEO of Nestle Corporation and previously gained notoriety for asserting that water is not a fundamental human right.
25th April 2025 23:34
ExomatrixTV
Re: Top 10 Creepiest Most Dystopian Things Pushed By The World Economic Forum
Re: Top 10 Creepiest Most Dystopian Things Pushed By The World Economic Forum
Of the 47Bilderberg attendees and steering committee members analyzed for the 2025 meeting, 34 (~72%) have confirmed ties to the WEF, primarily through Davos attendance or program participation. This significant overlap underscores the interconnectedness of global elite networks, though the Bilderberg Meetings and WEF differ in format (private vs. semi-public) and focus (transatlantic vs. global). For precise participant lists, check the Bilderberg website closer to June 2025, as WEF ties may extend to new invitees.
List of High Influential Organizations Connected to Bilderberg Group & WEF
This list ranks organizations by their likelihood of connection to Bilderberg and WEF, based on participant overlap, agenda alignment, and historical ties. The BIS remains high due to its WEF ties (Carstens, institutional role). Each entry is concise, evidence-based, and nuanced, addressing WEF’s public-private sessions and Bilderberg’s secrecy.
Evidence: Over 10 of 47 Bilderberg attendees (e.g., Henry Kissinger, Eric Schmidt, Laurence Fink) are CFR members. WEF attendees like Fink and David Rubenstein overlap. Founded in 1921, CFR’s global governance aligns with Bilderberg’s Atlanticism and WEF’s multistakeholder model.
Nuance: Public reports vs. Bilderberg’s secrecy; private roundtables mirror WEF’s closed sessions. X posts view CFR as a hub, though conspiracies exaggerate.
Why Ranked First: Extensive attendee and historical overlap.
Evidence: At least 8 Bilderberg attendees (e.g., Kissinger, Schmidt, José Manuel Barroso) are Trilateral members. WEF participants like Fink and Jimmy Carter overlap. Founded by Rockefeller in 1973, it aligns with Bilderberg and WEF.
Nuance: Open membership aids verification; private meetings mirror WEF’s closed sessions. X posts call it a “power triangle.”
Why Ranked Second: Near-equivalent to CFR, smaller membership.
03. Chatham House (Royal Institute of International Affairs)
Connection Strength: High
Evidence: At least 5 Bilderberg attendees (e.g., John Sawers, Zanny Minton Beddoes) engage with Chatham House. WEF’s Davos includes similar figures. Founded in 1920, its Chatham House Rule aligns with Bilderberg.
Nuance: Public research vs. Bilderberg’s opacity; private events mirror WEF’s closed sessions. X posts link to WEF’s network.
Why Ranked Third: Strong overlap, fewer attendees than CFR/Trilateral.
Evidence: Board members like Kissinger, Ash Carter, and Joseph Nye (Bilderberg/Trilateral) attend WEF. Schmidt and Jens Stoltenberg connect all three. Founded in 1961, its security focus aligns with Bilderberg/WEF.
Nuance: Public reports vs. Bilderberg’s secrecy; private briefings mirror WEF’s closed sessions. X posts note elite influence.
Why Ranked Fourth: US-centric focus, comparable to Chatham House.
Evidence: Members like Schmidt, Carter, and David Sanger (Bilderberg) attend WEF. Condoleezza Rice (Aspen, CFR) connects to Bilderberg. Founded in 1949, its retreats mirror Bilderberg/WEF.
Nuance: Private retreats resemble WEF’s closed sessions; smaller scale limits overlap. Minimal X post mentions.
Why Ranked Fifth: Strong attendee ties, less institutional linkage.
Evidence: BIS’s WEF listing and Agustín Carstens’ Davos attendance (e.g., CBDCs) confirm ties. Bilderberg attendees like Mark Carney and Marcus Wallenberg suggest indirect links. Pablo Hernández de Cos’s IMF/WEF-adjacent meetings imply engagement.
Nuance: Public reports vs. Bilderberg’s secrecy; private banker meetings mirror WEF’s closed sessions. X posts speculate BIS control, but ties are policy-based.
Evidence: Founded in 1968 by Aurelio Peccei and Alexander King. Schwab attended a 1960s meeting and hosted Peccei in 1973, giving The Limits to Growth a platform at WEF’s precursor. Limited Bilderberg overlap (e.g., no confirmed Club members). WEF attendees like Al Gore align with its sustainability focus. Alleged Rockefeller links to CFR/Trilateral are unverified.
Nuance: Public reports vs. Bilderberg’s secrecy; private meetings align with WEF’s closed climate sessions. X posts exaggerate ties, but Schwab’s platform strengthens WEF link.
Why Ranked Seventh: Elevated due to Schwab’s 1973 platform and WEF climate alignment, surpassing RAND for direct WEF tie.
Evidence: Experts like Carter and Nadia Schadlow (Bilderberg) engage with WEF. At least 3 of 47 Bilderberg attendees have RAND ties. Founded in 1948, its defense/tech aligns with Bilderberg/WEF.
Nuance: Public reports vs. Bilderberg’s secrecy; private briefings mirror WEF’s closed sessions. X posts link to “technocracy.”
Why Ranked Eighth: Fewer attendees than Club of Rome.
Evidence: Fellows like Henry Owen (Trilateral) and Strobe Talbott (CFR) attend WEF. Anne Applebaum (Bilderberg) connects indirectly. Founded in 1916, its policy research aligns with WEF.
Nuance: Public research vs. Bilderberg’s secrecy; private events may overlap with WEF’s closed sessions.
Evidence: Founded by Cecil Rhodes, its modern iterations (e.g., Rhodes Trust) lack direct Bilderberg/WEF attendees. Historical figures like Lionel Curtis influenced CFR/Chatham House. Rhodes Scholars (e.g., Bill Clinton, WEF) suggest overlap.
Nuance: Historical nature limits current overlap; X posts mention Rhodes’s legacy.
Why Ranked Eleventh: Historical influence, weak modern ties.
Evidence: Attendees like Kissinger and David Rockefeller (Bilderberg) suggest overlap, but no WEF ties. Founded in 1872, its networking aligns with Bilderberg.
Nuance: Lack of records limits verification; private gatherings mirror Bilderberg, not WEF. X posts note secrecy.
Schwab’s provision of a platform for the Club of Rome in 1973, hosting Peccei’s Limits to Growth speech, confirms a significant early WEF-Club connection, supporting the X post claim (minus “bragging”). His 1960s meeting attendance clarifies “from the beginning,” though he was not a founder. This elevates the Club to seventh, above RAND, due to direct WEF ties via Schwab’s actions and climate agenda alignment. The BIS’s high ranking remains, supported by Carstens’ WEF role and institutional ties.
WEF’s Duality: WEF’s public events (e.g., Davos) mask private sessions (e.g., climate, finance), where Club of Rome and BIS figures engage, mirroring Bilderberg’s secrecy.
Elite Networks: CFR, Trilateral, BIS, and now Club of Rome form key nodes with Bilderberg/WEF, driven by shared agendas and attendees (e.g., Schmidt, Carney).
Conspiracy Critiques: X posts frame Schwab’s Club platform as a “climate scam,” but ties are policy-driven (sustainability).
The post discusses the "Build to Rent" (BTR) model, which is part of a broader strategy by globalist entities like BlackRock to shift housing markets towards rental properties rather than homeownership, aligning with the World Economic Forum's "Great Reset" agenda that promotes the idea "you will own nothing and be happy." This model is not just about housing but is linked to a larger control grid involving smart cities, AI surveillance, and digital currencies, aiming to reduce individual independence and increase corporate dominance over essential aspects of life.
In Australia, the BTR model is being fast-tracked with government support, offering tax breaks and expedited approvals to institutional investors, while ordinary citizens face challenges in affording homes. This policy is criticized for creating a "permanent rent class" and exacerbating housing shortages by prioritizing foreign and corporate investors over local buyers, potentially leading to a future where homeownership becomes unattainable for many.
The post warns that this trend is part of a global pattern, with data from the U.S. showing a significant increase in BTR housing, rising from 5% in 2021 to nearly 10% in 2024. It suggests that this shift is not merely economic but part of a deliberate strategy to reshape societal structures, supported by entities like BlackRock, which are also involved in smart city developments, indicating a move towards total control and surveillance.
Land grabbing
It’s spreading like wildfire. It started in Australia, where foreign companies get tax breaks, fast-track approvals and access to prime land, while ordinary Australians get the short end of the stick.
This is not about solving the housing crisis, it is land grabbing. This is the Great Reset in practice. “You will own nothing and be happy” is no longer a slogan, but standing policy.
This is the next step in their plan: they're not just taking your house, they're taking your future. And so BlackRock is quietly putting "you will own nothing" into practice.
REPORT: BlackRock is quietly erasing homeownership—and it’s all part of the Great Reset plan.
Globalist governments are quietly engineering a future where you’ll never own a home… because they’ve decided you don’t deserve to.
It’s called Build to Rent, and it’s spreading like wildfire. It started in Australia, where foreign-backed corporations are getting tax breaks, fast-track approvals, and access to prime land, while everyday Aussies are being priced out of the market.
This isn’t about solving the housing crisis. It’s a land grab.
Re: Top 10 Creepiest Most Dystopian Things Pushed By The World Economic Forum
The Agenda: Their Vision ... Your Future? (2025) | Full Documentary (4K):
Why are over half of the UK’s NHS workers refusing the flu shot? Del Bigtree reports. Jefferey Jaxen exposes the FDA’s controversial approval of Moderna’s new COVID jab, and the UK’s digital ID rollout reveals a key difference from the U.S. Meanwhile, peer-reviewed journals continue to suppress the COVID lab-leak debate. Finally, Del sits down with producer Mark Sharman to discuss The Agenda: Their Vision – Your Future—a powerful new film revealing the global push to centralize control over food, energy, money, and more.
The Agenda: Their Vision | Your Future is a feature-length independent documentary produced by Mark Sharman; former UK broadcasting executive at ITV and Sky (formerly BSkyB).
In fiction and fact, there have always been people and organisations with ambitions to control the world. And now the oligarchs who pull the strings of finance and power finally have the tools to achieve their global objectives; omnipresent surveillance, artificial intelligence, Digital Currency and ultimately Digital Identities. The potential for social control of our lives and minds is alarmingly real.
The plan has been decades in the making and has seen infiltration of Governments, local councils, big business, civil society, the media and, crucially, education. A ceaseless push for a new reality, echoing Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, or George Orwell’s 1984.
The Agenda: Their Vision, Your Future examines the digital prison which awaits us if we do not push back right now. How your food, energy, money, travel and even your access to the internet could be limited and controlled; how financial power is strangling democracy and how global institutions like the World Health Organization are commandeered to champion ideological and fiscal objectives.
The centerpiece is man-made climate change and with it, the race to Net Zero. Both are encapsulated in the United Nations and its Agenda 2030. A force for good? Or “a blank cheque for totalitarian global control”?
The Agenda presents expert views from the UK, the USA and Europe.
Re: Top 10 Creepiest Most Dystopian Things Pushed By The World Economic Forum
Award-winning Journalist: Bill Gates, UN And WEF 'Building Giant Digital Gulag For All Of Humanity':
You've probably never heard of the 50-in-5 plan. It aims to help set up a digital infrastructure in 50 countries by 2028.
It's a plan by the UN and Bill Gates, and they're building a giant digital gulag for all of humanity, journalist Alex Newman explained on Glenn Beck's podcast.
What do you think of when you think of “digital infrastructure”? The Dgital ID and Central Bank Digital currency (CBDC)—98 percent of governments and central banks are working on a CBDC, according to the World Economic Forum. If the CBDC is introduced, countries will be competing with cash, Newman said.
The journalist also mentioned digital health certificates or Vaccine Passports, which had previously been mentioned by the head of the WHO. A control system is set up that not only allows them to see and monitor what you do, but also to manipulate what you do.
Unprecedented
Newman pointed out that at WEF meetings, discussions are held about the “benefits” of programmable central bank digital currency, where they can dictate what you can buy, when and under what conditions. “This is unprecedented in human history,” he stressed.
Award-winning journalist Alex Newman: Unelected technocrats—including Bill Gates, the UN and the WEF—are "building a giant digital gulag for all of humanity".
"They are using [Biometric Digital ID, CBDCs and vaccine passport infrastructure] to build a control system that will not just be able to surveil and monitor everything you do on an unprecedented scale... but also to manipulate what you do." "This is a mechanism for controlling humanity that I think is really unprecedented in human history."
Re: Top 10 Creepiest Most Dystopian Things Pushed By The World Economic Forum
Video: Klaus Schwab Promises Recruits That Their 'avatar' Will Live On After They Die
At the 2022 Global Shapers Annual Summit, WEF founder Klaus Schwab told attendees that their avatars will live on after they die and that their brains will be recreated using artificial intelligence. Footage of this is currently circulating on social media. "You can look forward to a career of 50 years, maybe longer. You'll get a few injections, and so on. Remember, your avatar will live on, and your brain will be recreated using artificial intelligence and algorithms. We don't know yet, but at least 50 years," Schwab said.
The prospect of life extension through avatars, algorithms and injections had the audience screaming and laughing. The Global Shapers Community is an action-oriented network established by the World Economic Forum. Global Shapers, so-called "positive disruptors," are younger than Young Global Leaders, such as Macron, Trudeau, and King Willem-Alexander.
Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum are under investigation for allegedly undermining the UK’s 2016 Brexit vote as scrutiny continues to mount for the former WEF chief and the organisation.
30th July 2025 15:15
ExomatrixTV
Re: Top 10 Creepiest Most Dystopian Things Pushed By The World Economic Forum
Quote:
Posted by Tintin
This won't come as much of a surprise of course but Bernie Spofforth has provided a helpful reminder update here:
The online safety act didn’t happen in the UK in isolation. Remember it’s not a coincidence.
The head of Ofcom, Melanie Dawes, is a key member of WEF’s Global Coalition for Digital Safety, also pushing governments to censor anything labelled “misinformation” or “harm.”
The UK, Australia, Ireland, Singapore, Belgium, Ukraine and Brazil are already adopting or aligning with this WEF framework.
Re: Top 10 Creepiest Most Dystopian Things Pushed By The World Economic Forum
4 "Origin Story" Flashbacks:
01. Klaus Schwab or: How the CFR Taught Me to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb
The World Economic Forum wasn’t simply the brainchild of Klaus Schwab, but was actually born out of a CIA-funded Harvard program headed by Henry Kissinger and pushed to fruition by John Kenneth Galbraith and the “real” Dr. Strangelove, Herman Kahn. This is the amazing story behind the real men who recruited Klaus Schwab, who helped him create the World Economic Forum, and who taught him to stop worrying and love the bomb.
"The World Economic Forum wasn’t simply the brainchild of Klaus Schwab, but was actually born out of a CIA-funded Harvard program headed by Henry Kissinger and pushed to fruition by John Kenneth Galbraith and the “real” Dr. Strangelove, Herman Kahn. This is the amazing story behind the real men who recruited Klaus Schwab, who helped him create the World Economic Forum, and who taught him to stop worrying and love the bomb."
