WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

Hi:

I have to rush off to work soon, so this will be a short one. There has been plenty of suspicion relating to Bill Decker, the Dallas Sheriff’s Department, and the Dallas Police Department. The Roscoe White story, and how one of the backyard photos ended up in the possession of his widow, is one of the many intriguing connections to the assassination. Obviously, at best, investigative procedures broke down, and Ruby murdered Oswald at the Dallas PD, as he was being transferred to Decker’s custody, so I am very sympathetic that at least some in those jurisdictions were in on it, maybe as infiltrated agents for the CIA, I have heard that the plot was hatched within the Dallas PD, etc. Decker was in JFK’s motorcade.

But again, I am going to lean heavily on Gary’s account, in which Decker told him and Audie Murphy:


“God only knows how this will turn out so you guys get something straight right now. There was never any conspiracy in my Sheriff’s Department nor in the Dallas PD. I’ve known all these people too long…I’d have known it…believe me, something as crazy as this I’d feel it in my bones.”


Then Decker asked them if they wanted to meet who turned out to be John Tower.

As I have written plenty, I accept the authenticity of Gary’s account, and I’ll say that Decker’s reaction was genuine, between friends. If the assassination plot involved members of the sheriff’s department or Dallas PD, Decker was not aware of it, and Tower’s story is all about much higher levels of the game, such as military intelligence and the CIA, whose members were double-crossed themselves as the fake assassination plot turned into a real one.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

I have never written too much about Audie Murphy and the Tower conversation. Murphy was a legend from a bygone era, with nobody in the USA today of his particular stature. Any man of his generation, especially who had been in the military in World War II, immensely respected him. That was surely part of why Tower met with him, Gary, and Gary’s partner. When Murphy announced the trip to Gary, to go meet Tower, it was with a big grin. They flew to the meeting in New Mexico in Murphy’s private plane. Murphy also had some horse business to engage in there, and they did that on the way back to the plane after Tower’s sobering revelation.

The documentary evidence that Tower gave to Gary, he gave to Murphy for safekeeping. I have been asked about the envelope by some names in the JFK milieu, but I don’t know what became of it. I never asked Gary. I never felt that I should. After they got back to LA, Gary and his partner knew that it was a situation that they had no business sticking their noses into, and it would definitely risk their lives to. They decided to stay quiet, and a few days later, Murphy called them to his office at Universal Studios, with his grin gone, and told them that Decker had been ringing his phone off the hook. Hunt’s team had recovered from the initial shock of having the operation infiltrated to pull off a real assassination, and the CIA, military, and FBI then went into cover-up mode, and Decker told Murphy to return the envelope, and that Tower had that meeting and gave them that envelope in a moment of panic. Murphy said that they threw the envelope’s contents, torn into pieces, out of the plane on the way back to LA.

Decker died in 1970, Murphy the next year in a plane crash that Gary did doubted was an accident, Gary’s partner Frank died several years later, and Tower’s plane crashed in 1991 (the day after another politician died in a plane crash, and their deaths have “curious” coincidences), leaving Gary the last member of that meeting until Gary died in 2005.

Gary thought that Arlen “Magic Bullet” Specter was one of the monitors of Hunt’s operation, in order to interpose it and turn it into a real assassination. More on that in later posts, but for now, it is off to bed.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

Gary’s writings can seem like something from the McCarthy Era, and in a way, they are. Gary was no left-winger. He was a World War II sailor and an old-time policeman who believed that if the law was properly enforced, we could have a more just society. That was definitely part of his friendship with Audie Murphy. Gary did not vote for JFK, but as he began to understand what JFK was doing, he became more sympathetic, and many years before it was fashionable, Gary wrote that JFK was trying to end the Cold War, from reading Anthony Summers’s book and that was why he was murdered. Summers interviewed Gary about his knowledge of Marilyn Monroe’s life and death, for his Monroe book, and Gary was frustrated that Summers kept ignoring whom the evidence pointed to in the JFK hit.

By the 1980s, Gary was the most knowledgeable person alive regarding those LA days. Gary knew that Monroe did not commit suicide. She was being used as the world’s highest-class hooker for an influence-peddling scheme that reached into the White House, and when she became a loose cannon, she was murdered.

Movies such as LA Confidential and Chinatown were like chapters from Gary’s career. Again, Gary goes off the deep end on Jews and Jewish gangsters before his book is finished, and I can see why. His life was ruined by Jewish gangsters who also tried to kill him, and one still sits on a federal bench to this day, as a noted “liberal” judge (whom Gary saw meeting with Mickey Cohen back in 1947, when he had Cohen under surveillance).

As I see it, the only real contribution that I can make to the JFK assassination milieu is to note that I knew Gary and that he was describing his meeting with Tower, Decker, and Murphy as accurately as he could. I have no doubt about that. If nothing else, it blows all “lone nut” theories out of the water. Gary had his own ideas about the perpetrators, including Arlen Specter, who was Jewish and who also concocted the Magic Bullet theory. The Jack Ruby connection is undeniable, and Gary met Ruby when he was a high-ranking member of Mickey Cohen’s entourage.

There are all sorts of juicy nuggets like that in Gary’s work, from his days in LA. What Gary reported as his experiences, I have no doubt about. His theories are another matter. I approached the issues like a scientist or scholar. There are facts and hypothesis, and the scientific ideal is to construct hypotheses that account for all the known facts regarding a phenomenon. While there are many ways to interpret the facts of Gary’s journey, including very differently from how Gary did, for me, the lone nut theory on the JFK hit died in the 1980s.

I’ll go into Gary’s theories a little more, and then my own, and present my views on the JFK assassination issue. I part company with many in the JFK researcher crowd on numerous issues. I am not trying to solve the crime, but poking holes in the official story is more my game. Our system is not worth believing in. It is rotten to the core, and I am after bigger game than that, trying to help manifest the biggest event in the human journey. The JFK hit is certainly one of history’s most sensational crimes, and the resultant cover-up should make any thinking person pause, while thinking of our system’s legitimacy.

Best,

Wade

Hi guys:

I just want to say that I am going to finish an era of unlimited, relatively good, internet browsing experience once our subscription to the Canopy fixed connection antenna was not renewed. :( We'll find out. The Canopy is still working but I believe that our subscription ends this month, and since Canopy and other fixed connection equivalents were being "phased out", it's all over. :( It's a good ride of about 8 years.

It's very unfortunate that we are not capable of getting a DSL connection, since we do not have telephone lines here. The ISPs kinda "banned" our place because of the fears of rampant robbery of copper wires.

The more "evolved" and "better" version using the connections from cell sites is going to be capped, even if we "upgrade" or just go to the other prepaid packages and then using pocket wifi. We may even have to resort to "bypassing measures" to be able to get unlimited data until the sim card gets blocked. I see them being used frequently in the Internet, but it's such a freaking hassle. Or if we "upgrade", we are most likely going to spend 3 times the price of the old Canopy, because of the "volume boosters" or something, if decide to get the supposed upgrade. This is very terrifying for such a heavy Internet surfer like me.

Unfortunately, I don't have much choice. I can use mobile data though, but I can no longer stream. If I go to a computer shop, I might. If we used the crappy upgrade, I might but once the data cap enters, it's going to be terrible. I am terrified of the possibilities that the upgrade, if my sister decided to go for it, is going to truly suck in terms of reception, even if we are near a cell site. I do hope it's not the case. I am almost getting emotional now. I really wanted to cry. It's a goodbye. 2008-2016.

I am hoping that the contract is still not ending this month or next month and that this can still be delayed, or something. Or if it's really now... well, I just want to cry.

I belong to the country with one of the worst performing countries in Internet broadband connection, or even the overall Internet connection. We are just a few notches higher than Afghanistan!!! Unbelievable. We also pay a lot more than other countries for crappier service. This is just unfortunate for me.

It's also not good that Telstra was stopped by the Globe/Smart duopoly from making a foothold here and take advantage of San Miguel's spectrum, which the duopoly don't use. The entire market is going to change. The speed is going to be way better. But no... it's not happening.

http://testmy.net/country/ph
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intern...Internet_Speed
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjen.../#1b86befe717a
http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2016/...d-slowest.html
http://www.bworldonline.com/content....peed&id=124719
http://opinion.inquirer.net/88125/th...of-ph-internet
https://www.reddit.com/r/Philippines...local_internet
http://www.philstar.com/opinion/2015...ternet-so-slow
http://www.manilatimes.net/telstra-y...siness/250675/
http://www.smh.com.au/business/telst...18-glr8fo.html

For all of the crappy service, I managed to do some tweaks myself and it's been working very well. I know that what we have is comparatively better. It's been a ride. This is special. I'll never be able to get here, you know! There are no available landlines here, so the Canopy is the only savior that gave me the entire unlimited surfing experience, without the data caps, and now they are taking it away! For their supposed nonsense upgrade!

It's over. It's been an amazing journey, but now it's over. I am only a heavy user in terms of streaming, but I spend most of my time in forums and reading with occasional social media. But it's going to be over. :( It's any time from tomorrow to June. If we managed to dodge a bullet here, it can be longer. But it's not going to last until 2017.

This is simply one of the things that I have to say why I am not going to be qualified for the choir. Or I don't think I am really qualified anyway. But if there is going to be a future Filipino potential choir member, make sure that he/she has a decent DSL connection with no data caps! This is just insane.

So, guys, don't expect me to be here quite often anytime soon. There will be long droughts or something. I still have to find that job so I can take the risk of installing my own plan or to help with the upgrade through paying for volume boosters, if it turns out that the upgrade can perform if necessary. Obviously, the options are still being discussed here.

We are really heavy users here, it's not just me. There are about 12 users here, though I may be the heaviest user. But I've got two nephews who play games online, so they may surpass me. It's not going to be possible to share the same WiFi anymore.

And Youtube is also partially my music player! It's just...gone! Or it will be gone.

It's over! And I am very depressed and disappointed and angry! I want to shoot our oligarchs!

So, ok, I still have to look for some job openings while this connection still lives! I have to do this en masse now or something. If my sister decides to go to our ISP's local branch tomorrow, it might be over if she decides for the upgrade, or if our contract, if I saw it tomorrow, is really going to end this month. There will be no renewal, and given the implications of the inquiry, there will be a quick disconnection. I need to have a job. I need to fill up the loss myself by having the money. There is just no other choice here. There are no landlines here. And the ISPs does not seem to want to establish one.

I am sorry guys if I am venting all of my frustrations here. I just can't help it. But I also need to say that I may be in some hiatus now or something. I just need to save some money so I cannot consume the daily unli mobile data with no streaming and downloading that much. That will become my default and if I want to stream, I may cheat to use the data of the upgrade. But I just don't have money yet for any plan or Internet expenses. I also need to use more time in job hunting and applying for more government IDs, etc.

Thanks for reading,

Serg.

Hi Serg:

Sorry to hear of your connection problems. A mere 20 years ago, the world was just beginning to hear of the Internet, and now, we can’t live without it. Your situation is an example of technological devolution, which happens in declining economies.

For a few reasons, cost, attracting the right people, and not demanding high-bandwidth to digest, I made my site purposefully “low” tech. People can still digest my work with low bandwidth.

Best wishes for a happy ending with your connection issues,

Wade

Hi:

Gary’s Tower conversation has been called the basis for a master theory on the JFK hit, as it brings in many connections, such as Hunt, the CIA, the FBI, the military and the Cold War battle against communism, George Bush, the Cuban exiles, the Texas connection (just how connected Lyndon Johnson was will likely always be a question), and others. Tower said that there was no way that Oswald would have ever shot that policeman, either.

That is the meat of what I have to offer on the JFK hit. I knew Gary, and the way that we met and what we had in common I hope brings more credibility to Gary’s account. He was Audie Murphy’s friend and bodyguard, and a cop and investigator, and he enacted endless lawsuits against the establishment gangsters. He was no anonymous whistleblower, hiding in the weeds, but was a whistleblower in the best sense of the word, risking his life to make noise.

In my coming posts, I will get more into Gary’s theorizing on the JFK hit, and get into my views on the matter, in ways that I have not done before.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

I haven't asked my sister yet about the contract but she's been looking for alternatives and she's asking for advice. I don't know how to answer her yet but they did remember that they renewed the contract two years ago around this time of the year. I don't think she saw our contract. She did went to buy stuff for the Mother's Day celebration here in the Philippines.

And in light of that, I want to say Happy Mother's Day to all mothers reading here! :) I don't know if it's an international date or something.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother...N.E2.80.93S.29

I just want to say something about our upcoming national elections on May 9, tomorrow Manila time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip...election,_2016


And I can't believe that I am going to vote for Rodrigo Duterte for President, though I'm not going to vote for Bongbong Marcos. I just can't. To make it balanced, I am going to vote for the Liberal Party candidate, Leny Robredo, as Vice-President. Because I am fearful of the semi-fascism of Duterte. He's an anti-establishment candidate and a self-declared leftist and socialist. If elected, He will be the first leftist president of the Philippines, or close to a leftist. Nevertheless, he's still have some deep ties to the establishment politics of the country, though he's capitalizing of the situation in this country. In fact, the business community does not seem to be fearful of him, except perhaps the local oligarchic elite tied to the Lopez-Araneta group and a partial section of the Cojuangco group that have ties to the Aquinos.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodrigo_Duterte
http://www.getrealphilippines.com/bl...nied-filipino/
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/02/d...-death-squads/
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/08/p...marcos-aquino/

After all, the CPP-NDF group is perhaps the greatest hurdle towards a real heterogenous left progressive movement in the country.

Duterte is just a Donald Trump-like candidate, though a self-proclaimed leftist and socialist, with the guts of talking with Maoist ideologist, Joma Sison, and offering him a coalition government. Incredible. And yet, he speaks of "abolishing Congress" and forming a "revolutionary government" with military and police support if he did not get his reforms, the greatest of them is federalism, killing "100,000 petty criminals" in a tough law and order platform within six months, and he's not afraid to kill. He developed a reputation of law and order in the southern frontier of the country, in the city of Davao. It was thoroughly transformed from a "killing capital of the country" into one of the safest cities to live in the world. He's being compared to Lee Kuan Yew and all of that. He did through "death squads", with these squads becoming the judge and the executioner and acts like a secret police. It's somehow terrible.

Nevertheless, I can't help but give him a chance. It's a risk. I can't vote for Miriam Santiago because she's merely a protest candidate and she's battling cancer and anorexia. In a declining civilization, you just have to take some short-term risks for some "self-preservation". And I am living in a Third World country.

http://www.rappler.com/nation/politi...most-dangerous

The mainstream media is now full of anti-Duterte advertisements and even Mar Roxas, the administration candidate, offered Grace Poe, the "independent" (supposed CIA funded) candidate, to back down the race to not split the anti-Duterte vote. Poe declined. I guess part of the reason is that the international business community based in Manila does not seem rattled by Duterte. In fact, surveys showed that the business community expects the economy to get better, not worse, even under Duterte.

I guess, we all just have to wait and see.

But in case the country gets into an authoritarian turn, Don't expect me to show up here for a while. I just have to be careful even if the Internet may not be openly censored and monitored. I am already a leftist, but I don't fit into the mainstream radleft that's dominated by a nominally Maoist oriented leadership. You'll never know. We just have to wait and see. After all, I am also going to face some Internet posting and surfing adjustments too, in addition to finding a job.

So, yes, thanks guys for reading.

Serg.

Hi:

Serg, by all means, don’t risk yourself by posting, especially if some death squad president is “elected.” Yes, Mother’s Day is international, with different dates of celebration. As Bucky said, all politicians are stooges of the economic interests.

But my work in particular is going to be hard to get too bent about. I deal almost exclusively with American politics (and the European influences that led to them), and I really don’t care much for any politics, as it is all an artifact of scarcity. My game is abundance, and my political writings are intended to help people to give up all politics.

I don’t give a damn if Hillary or Trump or even Bernie is president, because it does not matter, not for anything important. They are all puppets, and the presidency is not where the real power is. I am constantly approached by people who are stuck in retail politics, just like people get stuck in money when thinking about economics, when money is even more of an illusion than politicians are. The choir is about raising the conversation orders of magnitude beyond retail politics and economics, which is all egocentric anyway (“What’s in it for me?”), and those discussions are mostly at the gossip level. I have yet to find anybody who can run with me on those issues, but I am not going to settle for less, because less is not going to work for what I have in mind.

I would not think that politicians in any country are going to have much problem with discussing the demise of the dinosaurs and the latest scientific papers on the issue.

On a different topic, when I helped Brian write that proposal for the DOE, it was because the DOE had asked for exotic energy proposals, under Obama’s watch. But it was only a few months after Dennis was run out of the USA by the Obama administration for selling high-MPG carburetors. Bush the Second’s energy advisor was a big fan of Dennis’s, but it did not matter. That is another example of it not mattering who the president is. Brian’s effort was part of his admitted codependence with Washington, D.C. I have never visited and don’t plan to, not the least of which is because people like me often end up dead when interacting with Washington. The needed change is not going to come through the retail political system, corporations, “progressive” organizations, etc. Those are the old skins that are not going to hold the new wine, and their memberships are all committed to their scarcity-based frameworks. They can’t even imagine abundance, and for the few who do, they treat it like the enemy, as bizarre as that can seem at first, but they are simply addicted to scarcity.

Yesterday, I received an email from Greer’s organization, asking FE inventors to come forward. Greer is worldlier than most on this issue, but he does not have anything like a choir going, and his über-warrior, heroic approach is not going to work, IMO. Neither will Dennis’s Indiana Jones, P.T. Barnum, “patriot, Christian approach. They are all approaches rooted in scarcity and fear, to one degree or another, and only a loving approach is going to work, IMO. It is time for a tiny fraction of humanity to manifest some sentience and integrity.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

OK, it is picture time! :) Attached is a picture of the Columbia Gorge, taken on the way to visit my favorite Aunt, back in early April. And the other three are from yesterday. One is taken in my front yard, of the irises, and the other two are from hiking with my wife in the woods. It is leprechaun time!

Best,

Wade

Hi:

Here is a post on Gary’s theorizing, before I begin my busy day. A primary theme of my work is that people rarely escape their conditioning, even partially, in their lifetimes. We are required to choose love to awaken to our divinity. There is no other way. People stay asleep partly because their conditioning is in-group conditioning, and there are carrots and sticks to entice or coerce compliance, and hardly anybody has the integrity to question that scarcity-based and egocentric conditioning, so they shuffle along with the herd.

Those that I respected the most always drank the Kool-Aid the deepest, in their Boy Scout ways, and they all woke up the hard way, which was part of their radicalization, and I have called them disillusioned idealists. Gary, Dennis, Brian, and Ralph all qualified, and with all of them, I could see how they all, to one degree or another, never quite relinquished all of their baggage. Dennis still believes in the agrarian religion that he was raised with, Brian was codependent with Washington, D.C. to the end, Ralph was still a “patriot,” even after all that he endured, and Gary still believed that justice could be pursued through the legal system, ex-cop that he was.

Like them, I woke up the hard way. Unlike them, except for Ralph, I went to business school and still make a living in the business world. It is not an easy dance, and I am the only person in the FE field that I know of who has successfully done that dance. I left the fairy tales of my capitalist indoctrination behind pretty early, but it really took my days with Dennis to finally beat it out of me. Godzilla is capitalism on steroids. I do not believe in the capitalist ideal, but Gary, Brian, Dennis, and Ralph all believed in the American dream, and they all sought their ideals, such as Gary with justice through the legal system, Dennis with his “patriot,” Christian, and businessman’s ideals, and so on.

I do my best to not “believe” in any of the ideals of our Epochs, neither the Fourth, Third, nor Second, as all are rooted in scarcity and fear. They all had brief Golden Ages in the early days of exploiting new energy sources, but they were never sustainable. Only the Fifth Epoch will be sustainable, energetically, economically, and environmentally, and humanity will live in absolute, universal, and sustainable abundance for the first time, and will become a Type 1 civilization. Nobody has ever experienced that before, but we have some hints of what that might be like. So, I always try to be mindful of people’s backgrounds and conditioning, and how it has distorted their awareness. One reason why I am so frank about my background, journey, and human foibles is so that my readers can be aware of what mine might be. We are all human, which comes with its blessings and curses.

With that preamble out of the way, on to Gary’s theorizing on the JFK hit. I don’t know about Gary’s childhood, but his encounters with Jewish gangsters, beginning with Mickey Cohen, gave him views on Jews that could easily be called anti-Semitic. But he tried to keep his efforts focused on Jewish gangsters, not Jews in general, but Gary fell for anti-Semitic propaganda, understandably. Jewish scholars are definitely guilty of playing up the Holocaust, but it does not make Holocaust Denier works valid, and like so many bodies of work, they have a superficial plausibility until somebody does the work and goes deeply on the subject.

Ironically, that cop, who witnessed an event in Gary’s book and concurred with Gary’s rendition of it, challenged Gary’s assertions about the Jews (as in their religion worships the devil – heck, many Christian sects saw Jehovah as Satan, understandably), but after the Jewish neocon-assisted invasion of Iraq, that cop asked me if maybe Gary was right all along. :) Brian briefed some of those Jewish neocons in his space days, and he was disturbed by their behavior.

Ashkenazy Jews are humanity’s most “intelligent” ethnic group, and are highly overrepresented for scientific Nobel Prizes, for instance. So, it is natural to conclude that Jewish organized crime might be exceedingly clever, and it appears to be that way. Gary’s book came to focus on Jewish gangsters, perhaps obsessively, whom he called “Mishpucka.” Gary was not shy about naming names, which is partly why they tried to kill him. One judge that gave Gary great pain is Jewish and still sits on the federal bench today, in his 90s, as a noted “liberal” judge, which is great gangster cover. In some ways, Gary saw the Mishpucka as just another organized crime organization built along ethnic lines, just like Italian, Japanese, Irish, Chinese, and Mexican crime syndicates.

I have seen the Global Controllers called very organized crime, so the Mishpucka are not much of an aberration, but they are not at the top of the global food chain, IMO. We encountered the Rothschilds on our journey, who probably comprise the most legendary Jewish dynasty, and they are not at the top, either. But I also doubt that the JFK hit originated from the top, anyway, but down a level or three. The Global Controllers have “loftier” concerns. Allen Dulles was the chief “fixer” for the Rockefellers, and he ran the Warren Commission. I think that interposing Hunt’s operation came more from that level of the game, not the Global Controller level. The Jewish connection for the JFK hit was likely down a level from the Dulles level, as useful assets, not masterminds.

Take Henry Kissinger, another prominent Jew whom numerous conspiracy theories swirl around. I have connections to covert operations that he was part of, and “Henry” (as his crew calls him) is not anywhere near the top, either. He plays more at the “fixer” level that the Dulles bothers did. The people who really run the show on Earth you have never heard of. While some have named some of the organizations involved, the members who really pull the strings remain anonymous. It is good for business to be that way, and visible actors such as Kissinger, Dulles, that federal judge, Specter, etc., are soldiers, if clever ones, not masterminds. They are generally all what we would call psychopaths, or dark pathers (some were “merely” sociopaths – psychopaths are naturally “talented,” but sociopaths need training). It is merely a hazard of having free will. We had numerous psychopaths sicced on us over the years (1, 2, 3), and they were good at what they did, I’ll grant them that. Selling one’s soul pays well, for a while. :)

Gary encountered Jack Ruby as a VIP member of Cohen’s entourage, as a representative of the Chicago Mob, in 1947. Ruby was no two-bit hood, as the Warren Commission tried to portray him as, but was a long-standing and high-ranking member of the Mob. Ruby’s real name was Jacob Rubenstein, which is as Jewish as it gets. Gary fingered Arlen Specter as one of the “monitors” of Hunt’s operation, to turn his fake assassination plot into a real one. Specter concocted the ridiculous “Magic Bullet” theory, which the entire “Lone Nut” hypothesis on the JFK hit rests on, and Specter was also Jewish. IMO, Gary can be forgiven for believing that the Jewish Mob was behind the JFK hit. They may well have been, but I think that they were likely more along the hit men lines rather than masterminds, although I could be wrong.

Gary concluded that Ruby was supposed to kill Oswald immediately after the hit, but that cop Tippit got in the way and Oswald escaped while Tippit was murdered. Ruby was ordered to finish the job, which he did, to tie up that loose end. That is what gangsters of Ruby’s level can be called on to do, and they do it (the consequences can be severe for failing to, such as killing off their family, being tortured to death, etc.). Oswald was framed as the real assassin from the beginning, from the news reports that instantly came out to planting the Magic Bullet at the hospital.

How much members of the Dallas PD may have been involved will likely always be a question for me, from Ruby doing the deed at the police station to the Roscoe White connection, etc. But again, I see their involvement as being far less than masterminds and more like covert action assets being orchestrated to play their roles.

I have no doubt that the Jewish Mob was involved in the JFK hit in some way, and Ruby’s involvement should erase all doubt. But were they the masterminds who interposed Hunt’s operation? Maybe so, but I think that higher levels of the game orchestrated the hit, and I’ll get to my views in coming posts.

I see Gary’s obsession with the Mishpucka as being due to his own encounters with them, and which made him susceptible to anti-Semitic propaganda, which is pretty normal in the USA. Nobody would call Gary a scholar. The USA is history’s most racist nation, I was raised in that racist environment, so Gary’s Jewish writings are all-too-understandable.

Time to begin my busy day.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

Here is a little more on Gary’s experiences and theories. Gary’s path was largely set when he was assigned to put Mickey Cohen under surveillance. He tailed Cohen all over LA, recorded his conversations with quite a list of luminaries, and placed a listener who spoke Yiddish in a booth next to Cohen’s at a restaurant. One of Cohen’s restaurant meetings was with Menachem Begin, a bona fide terrorist and future prime minister of Israel. Cohen supplied weapons to Israel in its early days. When Begin was Israel’s prime minister, he never went to the UK because he was wanted for murder there.

The movie LA Confidential was based on the milieu around Fred Otash. Otash worked with Cohen to use and blackmail celebrities. One of his early successes involved introducing the Italian Stallion Johnny Stompanato to Lana Turner, and Otash had their bed at a Malibu motel wired for sound. Cohen made big money selling the records of their lovemaking session, and when Turner’s daughter murdered Stompanato, that record became a “must have” curio in Hollywood, and Cohen had thousands more records pressed.

Gary surveilled the beach party at Peter Lawford’s Malibu home, when JFK was introduced to Marilyn Monroe. Monroe was used as the highest-class hooker in a White House influence-peddling scheme. The USA’s relationship with Israel did not become the close one we see today, in which the USA showers Israel with billions of dollars every year, in history’s most lucrative foreign “aid” deal, until 1967, when Israel proved to be America’s kind of fascists, attacking their Arab neighbors and stealing their land. JFK had aligned himself with Arab and African independence movements, which Gary heard an enraged Cohen and Begin talk about.

Cohen tried to get Otash to reproduce his success with Turner and Stompanato and record Monroe and JFK in bed together, to blackmail JFK, but Gary thought that Otash was not successful, although a film of one of their sessions seems to have surfaced in recent years, and was quickly snapped up by an anonymous party. According to Gary, who would have known, when Monroe became unstable and could talk, her handlers murdered her and made it appear a suicide.

That was the milieu that Gary operated in, and that meeting with Tower was just part of the scenery.

Time to begin my busy week.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

I am getting to the end of Gary’s theorizing. Gary was a cop and investigator, after being a World War II sailor. He believed in the law enforcement ideal, and by his life’s end, he was always rooting out corruption. It is easy to find in the USA. :)

Gary’s career ended when he was “asked” to help frame somebody, and when he refused, he was framed instead. That is called being made an offer you cannot refuse, which I know about all too well. As a child, I went to school with the children of one of the framers, who lived in my housing development, and they always dressed fashionably and had plenty of money. Hmmm. Brian O nearly did not survive the “offer” that the USA’s military made to him when he mounted a UFO conference. Dennis nearly did not survive the final “offer” made by the Big Boys before they began playing rough. Don Corleone had no monopoly on making offers that could not be refused. Coming into contact with those “offerors” just comes with the territory.

While incredibly brave and virtuous, Gary was no scholar, and he fell for anti-Semitic propaganda, but that was understandable, being harried by Jewish gangsters. When the dust settled in Ventura, I thought that policemen and lawyers were about the lowest forms of life, and if you had told me back then that policemen and lawyers worshipped the devil, I might have believed you. :)

Did Gary connect too many dots? At times, probably, but he also had access to many dots that average people will never glimpse. When you begin to play at the level that Gary did, you can trip the light fantastic. When my close friends and associates received free energy and exotic technology demonstrations (1, 2), they did not seek them out, but they simply came with the territory. Go try to bring disruptive energy technology to market, such as putting the world’s best heating system on people’s homes for free, threatening to carpet the nation with them, and if you survive the experience, you will begin to find out how the world really works, not the TV and newspaper version that is fed to the masses.

It is very natural to get kind of conspiracist in one’s orientation when venturing into those realms. There are plenty of cloak-and-dagger games being played at those levels, some at surreal levels, as they toy with humanity and Earth, and they are life-risking levels to play at. And there is no end to armchair critics and “skeptics,” lying out of both sides of their mouths and committing elementary errors of logic as they defend their in-groups, but they don’t have any credibility with me or anybody else who has played at the high levels. The Global Controllers are very real, but Joe Average, punching the clock and riveted to the TV, with a beer in hand, will never encounter them, other than watching or reading some tabloid version of events.

Gary played at a different level of the game, and I have immense respect for the courage required to play there. The Ventura County gangsters wrecked Gary’s life and he died in exile, in Oregon, in 2005, fighting all the way.

Time for work.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

I just wished Dennis a happy 70^th birthday. How time flies. I vividly recall his 40th birthday. It was the only time that I ever talked to Mr. Financier. I saw him a month later, stricken, as his stolen company was used to help steal Dennis’s.

Nearly three years later, Dennis was in solitary confinement, writing about how he would not live to see this side of the bars, as the officials would bring him “death by inmate,” and they nearly did. I would not have taken short odds on Dennis living to 70 in those days. It is miraculous that he is alive today. Indiana Jones was not able to save the world by himself, but he took a good run at it.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

Gary thought that Jewish gangsters were behind the JFK hit. I think that the Jewish gangsters who were involved, such as Jack Ruby, were hit men more than masterminds, but I could be wrong. I was just rereading part of The Devil’s Chessboard last night, regarding Hunt’s “confession” to his son soon before he died. As Gary knew from his Tower conversation, Hunt was certainly involved on some level, and may well have been played as a chump. The author of The Devil’s Chessboard dealt with CIA men who worked with gangsters, such as Johnny Roselli, who figures prominently in a number of JFK hit scenarios, but The Devil’s Chessboard’s author thought that many clues from that milieu led to Allen Dulles, who ran the Warren Commission, as being one of the masterminds, if not the mastermind, of the JFK hit. Everybody has a theory. :)

I could go on for some time on Gary’s theories, but want to move to how I approached the JFK hit, using Gary’s experiences as my Rosetta Stone.

Time for work.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

Dennis’s response to hitting 70 is that he is halfway to 140. :) He is still going as hard as ever, incredibly. He has been banned from the energy industry in the USA, so he is going after banking and medicine, giving Godzilla some more sleepless nights.

I was telling my wife some funny stories last night of my days with Dennis, living with his family, especially in Boston. Seeing him and his wife with their grandkids was the highlight of my 9,000-mile road trip in 2013.

Sometimes, I look back at my life and wonder if it really happened, and it must be much more that way with Dennis’s life.  What a long, strange, and wonderful (and at times, horrifying!  :) ) trip it has been. 

Best,

Wade

Hi:

Briefly, before I run off to work. When I first read Gary’s book in January of 1989, it was just after the blackest month of my life, Dennis was in solitary confinement at the time, and parts of it were too painful to read, as he was describing events just like those that I was living through at the time, with some of the same officials being involved. The evil in Ventura County is monstrous, and most residents are completely oblivious to it, thinking that Ventura is just some fun beach town.

The Tower conversation was a mere sideshow in that book, but when I began to hit the books the next year, the JFK hit was among the many subjects that I dove into. Many people have devoted their lives to the JFK issue. My involvement has been far more modest. I had no doubt that Gary was reporting the Tower conversation as accurately as he could, first writing about it around a decade after it happened.

But I tried to take the scholar’s/scientist’s approach to the JFK issue, as I kept Gary’s account as my center-of-gravity. I never saw any convincing piece of evidence falsify Gary’s story, and over the years, as more evidence came to light, Gary’s story was only more powerfully supported, such as the Operation Northwoods documents. Two of the most prominent JFK hit efforts of the 21^st century, JFK and the Unspeakable and The Devil’s Chessboard, more than echo the particulars of Gary’s account (without ever mentioning it), and aim right into the same milieu that the Tower conversation dealt with.

Gary was a cop and investigator, and solving the crime was his profession, so his attempts to finger the masterminds and triggermen were understandable. As I have already written, solving the riddle of the dinosaurs’ demise was a scientific parlor game, with a hundred hypotheses proposed. That pales beside all of the JFK theories out there.

It seems like everybody has a theory on who did it, and they get into the minutia of the triggermen. I don’t need to belabor the list of suspects, do I? A small sample is the Italian Mob, the Israelis, the Soviet Union, Texas oilmen (including George Bush the First), Cuba, Lyndon Johnson, the Jewish Mob, the Dallas PD, the Secret Service, two independent teams coincidentally firing at JFK at the same time – The Washington Post hatched that most bizarre theory – right wingers, left wingers, the FBI, the MIC, and last but not least, the CIA.

In the Tower conversation, Hunt was played as a chump, but maybe Tower was a chump. What I have little doubt about is that Bill Decker had a frightened John Tower on his hands, who wanted to get the story and documentation into safe hands, as some kind of insurance, and maybe even an act of conscience.

For me, however, all of that is distantly secondary in importance. What is most important for Americans to understand was that there was no way in hell that Oswald was the lone assassin. That is the most unbelievable story of all, but was the official one, and still largely is among Establishment mouthpieces. The day after JFK was killed, Castro made a speech in which he noted the incongruity of Oswald’s sensitive military background (stationed at the U-2 base in Japan), openly defecting to the Soviet Union in a theatrical display, announcing that he wanted to give the Soviet Union sensitive American intelligence information, and then was welcomed back by the USA, which loaned him money to resettle instead of sending him straight to prison. Imagine Edward Snowden coming back to the USA to live and being given a hero’s welcome, not prison. If you think that that idea is realistic, then Oswald’s treatment makes sense to you.

Anybody with any background in the milieu knows that Oswald’s story, from his teenage years to his death, screams that he was an intelligence asset. But the USA’s chief spook and a prime suspect in JFK’s murder, whom JFK fired over the Bay of Pigs debacle, ran the very “investigation” of the crime. To be polite, he had a slight conflict of interest. :)

You really have to be an idiot to overlook all of that and accept the Warren Commission’s “Lone Nut” fairy tale, which hinges on a very magical bullet. But what is infinitely more important to me is not who pulled the trigger, and not even so much whose employ they were in at the time, but how the entire American establishment has conspired ever since to cover up the crime, often by muddying the waters with insane theories, such as that one from The Washington Post. For me, that is the real lesson of the JFK hit. The American establishment is rotten to its core.

The sitting American president can be murdered in broad daylight in front of hundreds of witnesses, and it all gets covered up. Every president since JFK has been a puppet and he knew it, and has been totally out of the loop on the important issues, particularly the ET situation and the exotic technologies that come with it. The ET connection with JFK’s and Marilyn Monroe’s deaths is one of many strange issues in this situation, and in coming posts I am going to present my journey with the JFK evidence and related matters.

IMO, JFK was taken out by the USA’s oligarchy (which includes the MIC), with Allen Dulles being one of their fixers, and the Warren Commission plowed to the foregone conclusion that was decided before the shots even rang out. Oswald was an expendable intelligence asset, as my close relative was. I doubt that anybody is going to “solve the crime” any better than that. The actual triggermen are relatively unimportant. Whom they did it for, and how the entire American establishment closed ranks to cover it all up, is far more important, at least for Americans. My work takes a meat ax to all in-group ideologies, and American nationalism in particular. I see it like that Rolling Stones lyric about who killed the Kennedys, “It was you and me.”

In the end, we all have to own our part in the situation, because until we own it, we can’t change it, and make no mistake, that is what my work is all about.

Time for work.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

I’ll have more time to write next week, I hope. At the same time that I began studying the JFK hit, I discovered the radical left, media analysis, the history I was never taught in school, seeing if anything was covered up about the Apollo Moon landings, studied the medical establishment and alternative medicine, various fringe topics, such as UFOs, free energy theory as well as orthodox science/thermodynamics, a great deal of mystical material, the “skeptics,” the worthlessness of my profession, and so on. After several years of those studies, I stumbled into the Velikovsky controversy around 1995 and remain on its fringes to this day. I met Brian O at the beginning of those studies, and if I had not had my mystical awakening at age 16, followed by my radicalizing years with Dennis, I would probably not have much worth saying, might never have embarked on those studies, and my naïveté would have likely stunted my awareness for whatever I did look into.

During my journey, I have encountered numerous enthusiasts on those various topics, and many reminded me of how I might have turned out if I had not met Dennis. They were naïve, and when the topics became conspiratorial, they either denied them, had a tabloid-ish orientation to them, or became paranoid. Conspiracism is an unhealthy mindset, but denial of those conspiratorial aspects is not healthy, either. Both mindsets think like victims, as they live in fear. Love is always the answer.

I began building my 2000-book library in earnest beginning in 1990, and JFK works were prominent additions. Because of Gary’s testimony, I never took the Warren Commission Report very seriously, and when I read parts of it, I gradually became dismayed over how poorly done it was. I clearly recall parts that tried to frame Oswald and give him his motivation to kill JFK, and it was some cheap psychological “analysis” that no self-respecting professional would dare produce. As Bobby Kennedy’s son later said, RFK considered the Warren Report a “shoddy piece of craftsmanship,” and I could see why. After 50 years of silence, the Kennedy family finally came forward and admitted that they never believed the “Lone Nut” conclusion of the Warren Commission, and if they did not believe it for Jack’s murder, they certainly did not believe it for Bobby’s.

Among the early JFK works that I studied was the High Treason series, Groden, Lifton, Lane, Summers, etc. After several years of those studies, Fetzer joined the party, and I am not sure that that was a good thing. I eventually obtained Piper’s book and subscribed to The Spotlight for years, during my far right studies. Piper’s book was his second on the subject. Gary told me that he walked into The Spotlight’s offices one day and talked with Piper, which was the genesis of Piper’s first book, which hardly mentioned Gary at all. Gary was miffed, and Piper’s second book gave Gary the credit that he deserved. I studied Posner’s work maybe more than any others, as reading debunker works can be very educational, as I had done for years with the “skeptics.” Studying Posner’s shabby work, and how the Establishment welcomed it, probably more than anything other single work did, convinced me what a hatchet job the Warren Report was. In the late 1990s, I encountered Jack White’s backyard picture analysis, and devoted a section of my essay to those backyard photos. Going deep on one aspect of the evidence has long been part of my writing style. Jack did some good work on those photos, but his subsequent work, on JFK, and the moon landings in particular, showed how Jack should have just stuck with those backyard photos.

Time for work.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

During those years of study, when important new JFK books came out, such as Fonzi’s The Last Investigation or Scott’s Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, I studied them. It was just one of many subjects that I studied in those days, in my radicalized state, and although I did not know it at the time, I was developing what is called a comprehensive perspective. But without my radicalizing experiences with Dennis, my understanding would have been a bit stunted, hemmed in by my conditioning. Social conditioning comes with being a social animal, and it often works directly against achieving true sentience. Very few people ever escape it, nor do they seek to, as they seek the safety of the herd. I seek the few escapees, or those who at least want to. It is not an easy trick, even for those who want to.

Even leaving aside what Gary knew about the JFK hit, virtually all of the best JFK works that I encountered placed the immediate responsibility for JFK’s murder with the USA’s intelligence apparatus (AKA “the spooks”), and the hypothesized hit teams were somewhat varied, from domestic mobsters, imported Italian mobsters, contract CIA agents (often ex-military), and the like. When the authors tried to identify the hit team’s sponsor, the sketchy trail almost always led to members of the USA’s oligarchy. The more ambitious tried to identify the triggerman and their employers, and I am somewhat sympathetic to such efforts, but I doubt that such efforts have been all that productive. I think that is safe to say that the hit was sponsored by domestic interests, not international ones. The last thing that the Soviets or Cubans wanted was JFK’s death. He was about the only sane player, who was trying to end the Cold War, not inflame it.

There were certainly key players in the cover-up, key beneficiaries of JFK’s murder, key members of the USA’s intelligentsia who took leading positions on the assassination, and much was playing a disinformation role. As Ed Mitchell said on the ET cover-up, the blizzard of disinformation is part of the cover-up. Spinning all sorts of wild yarns, which the unwary and gullible uncritically repeat, fixate on, etc., is part of how the three-ring-circus around the JFK hit has been sustained for more than 50 years.

One of the saddest aspects of the JFK hit is similar to how hypotheses play out in science, as a scientist stakes his career on a hypothesis and can never let go, clinging to his long-since falsified hypothesis to his grave. It seems like everybody wants to solve the crime, going after Moby-Dick with harpoon in hand, and the JFK milieu has been rich with feuds, petty squabbles, and the like, as each theorist vies for priority, and red herrings abound, etc. It is not much different from how it works with many fringe topics.

Even Uncle Noam joined the party, and it was painful to witness. I eventually came to learn that the Left has a conspiracy-phobia, and it took me many years to realize why. The Left is filled with scholars, and while not many of them are scientists, they attempt a scientific approach, but they miss the mark by confusing the scientific process with materialism, which is the religion of our industrial Epoch. The best scientists say that the story that science tells of how the universe works is about process and history, not intent, but the founding presumption of materialism is that there is no intent behind the universe’s creation or functioning: it is all one big accident. That is a philosophical stance, not a scientific one, but I constantly see people confuse the two, especially the “skeptics.” The greatest scientists understood the distinction, but the hacks don’t.

That “no intent” stance is used by the Left for describing human affairs. Nothing happens on the world stage intentionally as part of some grand design, but is merely Darwin’s “red in tooth and claw” stance applied to humanity. They deny that conspiracies can happen, as a matter of faith. There is no design in what happens on the world stage, but it is just the accidental outcome of vying interests. An identical situation dominates the free energy field. Scientists and intellectuals dismiss evidence of organized suppression of free energy as a “conspiracy theory.” Evidence is not theory, and I am living evidence of it. In a dialogue with the father of the Free Software Movement, his response was classic.

The battles over the JFK hit are similar, in that structuralists deny any conspiracy, on ideological grounds, the conspiracists get all in a lather, each defending their pet hypotheses, and the truth gets lost in the mayhem. It is not very important just who pulled the trigger, other than their identities may point in the direction of their employers, but the people behind the hit insulated themselves with several layers of plausible deniability. That is how the game is played, not Mr. Big instructing the shooters on the morning of the hit.

The JFK milieu is similar to what I see in mainstream science, with the tensions between the detail-orientation of the specialists and the pattern-recognition of the generalists. Specialists can get tunnel vision as they scrutinize the details, and it is usually up to generalists to recognize the pattern formed by the detailed evidence. Today, scientists are trained to avoid getting lost in the details, but now learn to pull back and consider the context before diving back in. That is a very welcome trend in science. I’ll give a couple of examples of where JFK specialists seem to get lost in the weeds.

Less than three weeks before JFK was murdered, the Secret Service foiled an assassination plot in Chicago, with a four-man shooter team, with a mentally unstable military veteran playing the patsy. The Secret Service man who objected to the official secrecy uncovering around the Chicago plot, and who had previously made noise and was nearly “erased” by the IRS a few days before the JFK hit, was kangarooed into prison.

A mere week after the Chicago plot was foiled, a right-winger was recorded by the FBI talking about an upcoming trip to Miami by JFK, and a rifle team shooting from an office building would take him out. That was less than two weeks before the Dallas hit.

How on Earth could people fail to see the similarities with what happened in Dallas? The “Lone Nut” hypothesis on Oswald looks shaky from that alone. JFK told his wife in the weeks before his assassination that there was a plot to kill him, from people close to him, and Jackie purposefully wore her bloodied clothes to Johnson’s swearing-in to show what “they” did to my husband. She voiced the first public notion of a conspiracy, with her “they.”

Similarly, I have encountered JFK theorists who think that they fingered the conspirators, but who don’t see how RFK’s murder could be related to Jack’s. “Wow,” is all that I can say to that. You have to wear some pretty thick blinders to not suspect that Jack’s and Bobby’s murders were related. The Kennedy family thinks that they are, but fear kept them silent for 50 years.

Those are two examples in which the tunnel vision of specialists can stunt their view of the bigger picture.

Gary’s encounter with John Tower always fit very neatly with all of the more respected efforts out there. I think that Gary got it wrong in his theorizing, seeing the Jewish mob as the masterminds, when their role was likely more ancillary. Gary’s view was very understandable, given his interactions with Jewish mobsters, who wrecked his life and tried to kill him, and I have seen his evidence of Jewish mobster involvement, beyond Jack Ruby, given serious consideration by respected researchers, but I doubt that they were behind the hit. They were involved, but not in charge.

What makes many theories, such as those featuring Jewish mobsters, the Dallas PD, and other suspects hard to credit is that they certainly had very little influence in enacting a frame job and cover-up from the beginning. Even if they interposed the mission, as Tower said, there was too much framing and covering up on the day of the assassination to lay it all at the feet of some small clique who interposed the mission. Some of the framing could have been for the “frame Castro” angle that Tower discussed, but way too much that happened in those days of the assassination and immediately afterwards that would indicate framing Oswald after the fact, not just setting up that frame Castro angle.

I think that it was ingenious for whoever interposed the mission to do it that way, as they quickly received avid cooperation in the cover-up by those involved in the “frame Castro” operation, which included members of the CIA, the FBI, and the military. I think that the CIA and FBI went into CYA mode as a bureaucratic imperative, and that inertia carries through to this day, even if high-ranking members of those organizations were in on it.

In Rodney Stich’s Defrauding America, he presented a conversation with a deep-cover CIA officer (a military colonel) who stated that JFK was advised of the plots against him in Chicago, Miami, and Dallas, and that a super-secret espionage group recorded one of the Rockefellers (likely David) and J. Edgar Hoover, in which Rockefeller asked if there was going to be any problem with the hit, and Hoover replied that Allen Dulles had it all handled and that the FBI was ready to do its part, and the conversations also identified George Bush the First and Lyndon Johnson as participants. Hoover’s tapped phone allegedly provided that evidence, which was given to a Congressman. None of that would surprise me in the slightest if true, and it once again fits Gary’s Tower story very neatly. I would not dismiss Stich lightly. He and I trod much of the same ground, and the gangster judges in California get creativity points for how they took out Stich. Dulles was well known as the chief “fixer” for the Rockefellers, and covering up the JFK hit was perhaps the greatest service that he rendered for his masters.

In short, in my studies on the JFK hit since the 1980s, Gary’s Tower conversation fit like a glove with the most formidable efforts. Much more is coming, including my views on the JFK hit and its implications, some of which I have not written publicly about before.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

Before I get into too much more JFK assassination intrigue, I need to address the issue of JFK, the man. Obviously, murdering him was a great crime. He was murdered at the absolute peak of American prosperity, which was humanity’s most prosperous period, and had movie star looks and a movie star life. He was a visionary, to some degree. He took on Wall Street, in legendary fashion, and tried to end the Cold War, after coming close to a nuclear holocaust. JFK returned from World War II with no illusions about how ignoble war was, and gave fiery speeches about dismantling the colonial order. Not long before he died, he proposed a joint effort to land on the Moon with the Soviet Union, and instructed the head of NASA to develop a plan by early 1964.

JFK bucked the MIC from the beginning of his presidency, such as not calling in air support for the Bay of Pigs fiasco and refusing to play hardball with the Soviet Union over the Cuban missiles. Those behaviors were unprecedented for an American president, and may have averted a nuclear holocaust. JFK certainly deserved great credit for those courageous decisions, and they likely helped lead to his death. Three days before JFK was inaugurated, Eisenhower gave his MIC speech as the CIA was helping murder the Congo’s first elected head of state. The moment that JFK heard about it, nearly a month later, is an indelible image. Kennedy was shocked by the murder of South Vietnam’s president, on the same day that the Chicago plot on JFK was foiled. He was not calling the shots nearly as he wished he did, and since his murder, every American president had no illusions: they served at the pleasure of much greater powers.

I have some connections to the Kennedys, and it is a mixed bag.

When Brian O was the up-and-coming astronomer who became an astronaut, in 1962 he met Bobby Kennedy at a Thanksgiving dinner, and Bobby laughed uproariously at a parody album of the Kennedys. The day before I became Dennis’s partner, I worked at a Kennedy foundation, and those early days of being Dennis’s partner was quite a time. One day, while answering the phone, Mr. Big of New England’s electric industry called our office, another day, a billionaire dropped by. Another day, we received the first offer from the Global Controllers to go away, and as I recall, we got the first call from the so-called White Hats in those days. We were making noise, and it challenged my ego in those days. We were doing shows and mailing out tapes, and Jackie Gleason watched them, soon before he died, for reasons that became clear later. But I was also losing my innocence in those days, for all that I had already seen, and began to get attacked by friends, which was a gentle preview of what would happen in my home town. The local officials were sharpening their axes, and one day, one of Bobby’s sons called the office. He had just begun his political career as a Congressman representing Boston, and runs an energy company today. He watched the tape (probably of our original show), and called up our office, asking to speak to Dennis directly. He said, “I wanted to call you personally, to tell you that you are an a**hole.” That was our Kennedy welcome to the idea of free energy.

Jack was not his relatives, but he certainly would not have won husband of the year. He was a legendary philanderer, and Jewish mobsters used that weakness by introducing him to Marilyn Monroe, for an influence-peddling and extortion scheme. Monroe and JKF met similar fates, and possibly for similar reasons, which I will deal with later.

I generally part company with many JFK researchers who saw Kennedy as some white knight on a steed, and that with his death, our once-great nation has been on a downward trajectory. While I am somewhat sympathetic to that view, it is high time to get past nationalism. The USA is an empire, but an increasingly creaky one, which will go the way of all empires, as they are all fundamentally evil, as they have been since the beginning. No nation on Earth has dealt out more death, destruction, and exploitation than the USA since World War II ended. Nobody else comes close.

JFK could be seen like Rome’s “Good Emperors,” but they all died of natural causes. He angered the wrong people, and had to go.

Best,

Wade

Hi:

A little more on Kennedy the man and his programs. If you ask Uncle Noam, JFK did not alter the trajectory of American foreign policy at all. Chomsky wrote a book to that effect, titled Rethinking Camelot, which cites William Blum’s work on JFK’s fondness for covert action. Blum is certainly one of the most astute critics of American foreign policy after World War II, and his Killing Hope is the bible on the subject. But in that book, JFK and his aides from Harvard were far from gung-ho foreign policy adventurers, who even sometimes “agonized” over their foreign policy decisions, but in the end, their Latin American policy was “scarcely distinguishable from that of conservative Republican administrations.”

JKF was close friends with fellow Irish-Catholic Joe McCarthy, who even dated two of JFK’s sisters. Anticommunism was the USA’s religion in those days, and the Harvard crowd preferred a more genteel version than the right did. The leading “dove” of those years was George Kennan, whom JFK appointed as ambassador to Yugoslavia, and Kennan’s 1948 foreign policy study became notorious.

I think that it is clear that JFK tried using the carrot more than the stick to help decolonize nations. But he clearly tried to woo them to the capitalist West and away from communism. His Alliance for Progress was one such program. His Peace Corps volunteers were essentially missionaries for capitalism. The Pentagon Papers made clear the Peace Corps’s foreign policy role. Economic Hit Man John Perkins got his start in the Peace Corps. When missionaries and Peace Corps volunteers fail (and capitalist persuaders such as Perkins), then it is time for covert action and, if necessary, invasion.

Harvard is the seat of the liberal establishment, and they treat Chomsky as the devil, because his stance shows how fraudulent the liberal position is: a kinder, gentler imperialism, at least on the surface. Uncle Ed called them the Cruise Missile Left when they beat the drums for invading Iraq with such “precision” weapons.

I think it is clear that JFK was very willing to admit failure and learn. The Bay of Pigs operation was mounted under Eisenhower and JFK inherited it. It is pretty clear that the CIA was expecting to manipulate the new president into calling in open air support for the invasion. JFK was blindsided by what happened, refused to call in air support, took full public responsibility for the disaster, but fired spymaster Allen Dulles in the aftermath. But Dulles was far from out of the picture, and Angleton and Helms still considered Dulles their boss, not JFK appointee McCone. Dulles was the Rockefellers’ “fixer” and betrayed every president that he served, going back to Franklin Roosevelt. The CIA has half-jokingly been called the standing army of the Fortune 500, and was founded by and run by Wall Street lawyers such as Dulles. Dulles served Wall Street, not the presidency.

JFK’s clashes with U.S. Steel and other corporations made him many enemies. One reason for the controversy around who was behind JFK’s murder is that so many interests wanted him dead.

I am onboard with the idea that JFK tried to end the Cold War, especially after the Cuban Missile Crisis. He began backdoor diplomacy with Khrushchev in his life’s last year, and hardliners in Khrushchev’s regime were also hostile to the idea of peace between the superpowers. JFK’s call for a joint American-Soviet mission to the Moon is concrete evidence of JFK’s direction, soon before he was murdered. He was taking an almost 180-degree about-face from the “brinksmanship” of the Eisenhower administration, led by the Dulles brothers.

Mike Parenti has long been one of my favorite voices on the Left, and he called out the Left’s conspiracy-phobia, especially regarding the JFK hit. The fact that JFK was not “Left” enough to satisfy the radicals does not mean that he was not nearly right enough to satisfy the oligarchy. JFK the man wanted to end American military involvement in Vietnam. The man who announced JFK’s death in Dallas, Malcolm Kilduff, Assistant Press Secretary, later reported that on the morning of November 21, JFK’s last full day on Earth, as he was preparing JFK for a press conference, JFK instead talked to Kilduff about Vietnam, and said:


“I’ve just been given a list of the most recent casualties in Vietnam. We’re losing too many damned people over there. It’s time for us to get out. The Vietnamese aren’t fighting for themselves. We’re the ones doing the fighting. After I come back from Texas, that’s going to change. There’s no reason for us to lose another man over there. Vietnam is not worth another American life.”


That is from Douglass’s JFK and the Unspeakable, p. 303. Arthur Schlesinger was more of a hagiographer than a historian regarding presidents, as Zinn capably demonstrated in his People’s History of the United States, and Schlesinger was the chief architect of the Camelot myth, so the “white knight on a steed” view of JFK does not deserve to be taken seriously, however, as Parenti wrote (in his Dirty Truths):


“JFK’s enemies in the CIA, the Pentagon, and elsewhere fixed on his refusal to provide air coverage for the Bay of Pigs, his unwillingness to go into Indochina with massive ground forces, his non-invasion guarantee to Khrushchev on Cuba, his overtures for a rapprochement with Castro and professed willingness to tolerate countries with different economic systems in the Western hemisphere, his atmospheric-test-ban treaty with Moscow, his American University speech calling for reexamination of cold war attitudes toward the Soviet Union, his antitrust suit against General Electric, his curtailing of the oil-depletion allowance, his fight with U.S. Steel over price increases, his challenge to the Federal Reserve’s multibillion-dollar monopoly control over the nation’s currency, his warm reception at Labor conventions, and his call for racial equality. These things may not have been enough for some on the Left, but they were far too much for many on the Right.”


This month’s Z Magazine features a talk that Chomsky gave in 2010, and Uncle Noam talked about how Lyndon Johnson received a visit from Wall Street’s “Wise Men,” who informed him that the Vietnam war was costing too much, creating too much domestic dissent, and he was ordered to deescalate the war and that he would not run for president in 1968, and Johnson immediately complied. That fits quite well with Fuller’s statement that political actors are always “stooges” of the economic interests. JFK was an anomaly, however, being a robber baron’s son and rich for his entire life, so he was not as beholden to the Wall Street gang as others were. In Chomsky’s talk, he also berated Ted Sorenson and Schlesinger for the Camelot myth, especially the idea that JFK wanted out of Vietnam, which Noam said was a totally unsupported idea. And this is where it gets painful with Uncle Noam. JFK did want to pull out of Vietnam, partly as an olive branch to Khrushchev. JFK the man changed his Cold Warrior views during his presidency. While not some flaming liberal, he definitely was pulling in America’s imperialist horns, and that was one reason among many why he had to go. He did not get the nice talking to that Johnson did. JFK was made an example of, and all presidents since him heard the message loud and clear.

In coming posts over the next week, I am going to get a bit into the spook side of things, what I think happened, and the bigger picture of what it all meant. Again, I am onboard with the idea that the USA’s oligarchy, the MIC in particular, were behind JFK’s murder, the framing of Oswald, and the cover-up. I have closer connections to that milieu than I may ever be able to publicly disclose, to protect the innocent and the guilty, but I will bring them in a little.

Time to begin a busy day.

Best,

Wade