Quote:
Written by Damir Nazarov
Despite all the claims about the alleged “defeat of Iran in Syria”, based on the Zionist press and the panicky behavior of the criminal clique of the terrorist Netanyahu, one gets the feeling that Zionism recognizes that Iran’s withdrawal from Syria is only a temporary tactical victory for “Israel”.
The abundance of contradictory opinions, articles and conclusions from the so-called analysts of “Israel” suggests that, as in 2011, Zionism does not know what to do with the new Syria, and this despite the friendly behavior of the jihadists, who are proud of having “saved the region from a major war between “Israel” and Iran”. On the one hand, the Zionists were worried that the collapse of the Assad regime would turn Syria into a “failed state” like Somalia, Lebanon or Yemen, which would allow the Iranians to easily move and organize local resistance to “Israel”. After some time, seeing that Damascus was ruled by a regime of jihadists with anti-Iranian views, Zionism nevertheless decided to divide Syria, for some reason believing that previous concerns about Iran’s actions could be ignored.
Speaking about the division of Syria, Zionism is now trying to create problems for Turkey first and foremost, designating it as “an enemy worse than Iran”. For this purpose, the Kurdish card is being played in northern Syria. But for the Turks to fully become protagonists in Syria, time must pass; so far, the pro-Turkish proxies have not demonstrated a desire to fight the Zionists. They are limited by sectarian anti-Shiite views and the inability to defeat the SDF. For this reason, “Israel” has time to approach Syria from the other side, for example, by involving old allies in the UAE-Saudi Arabia tandem, which, according to the logic of Zionism, should impose a fight on the Turks and Qatar for control over Damascus.
Summing up, we see that despite all the victorious pathos of Zionism, it is obvious that they do not have a clear strategy and for this reason they rush from one plan to another. Nevertheless, on the side of “Israel” are such facts as the presence in Syria of the international Takfiris, who are known for seeing enemies in everyone except “Israel”, Turkey’s problems in creating a new government with the presence of Ankara loyalists and the new dictatorship named Tahrir al-Sham, which assured the Zionists of its desire for peaceful coexistence.
In addition to Iran and Turkey, Zionism identifies two main components of the Palestinian resistance as a future ravine in Syria. However, at this stage, the situation again favors the Zionists, because the Syrian al-Qaeda is not going to provide Hamas with conditions for fighting the occupiers.
Thus, if we once again list all the main concerns of the Zionists in Syria – Iran, Turkey, the Islamic Resistance of Palestine (Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad), and compare the level of threat from this trio, we will come to the conclusion that Iran continues to be the most dangerous enemy of the Zionists. This argument is confirmed by the Zionists themselves. In addition to the collapse of Syria and the use of the Emirates to control Damascus, another option for influencing the Syrian Republic is increasingly being reported from supporters of the right wing of the “Israeli establishment” – the occupation of the entire south up to Damascus. We will soon see what plan the Zionists will choose for Syria and what awaits them next.
Quote:
Written by Drago Bosnic, independent geopolitical and military analyst
On January 14, the United States and the Pashinyan regime signed a strategic partnership agreement in Washington DC. According to the document, signed by Pashinyan’s Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan and US State Secretary Antony Blinken, this includes “advancing democracy and economic freedom, defending sovereignty and territorial integrity, strengthening the rule of law and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, supporting innovation and technological advances, and bolstering energy security”. It should be noted that these aren’t mere formalities, as this means that Yerevan will also be pushed ever deeper into the grotesque Sorosian/NED agenda, while the focus on “energy security” can only reinforce Washington DC’s continued obsession with limiting Russian energy projects and exports (particularly in the South Caucasus).
The document also stresses “the mutual desire to strengthen our relationship across the diplomatic, economic, energy, high-tech, educational, scientific, cultural, legal, defense, and security fields”. The US supposedly wants “a strong, independent, sovereign, and democratic Armenia, capable of defending its sovereignty, territorial integrity, and inviolability of internationally recognized borders is essential for lasting regional security and prosperity”. Yes, I laughed, too. The idea that Washington DC supports the “inviolability of internationally recognized borders” is beyond ludicrous, especially when considering the simple fact that it attacked approximately 100 countries since WWII, engaging in the so-called “nation-building” process, creating abhorrent entities such as the narco-terrorist “state” in NATO-occupied Serbian province of Kosovo and Metohia.
The US also insists that “Armenia’s continued democratic and economic reforms can unleash the full creative potential of its industrious citizens and thereby catalyze prosperity throughout the region and beyond”. Once again, this reeks of deeper Sorosian/NED involvement that can only do the complete opposite of what was stated. The document also stresses “the need to deepen [Armenia’s] political, economic, security, and social ties with other nations of the Euro-Atlantic community and broader community of democracies”.
This alone is shameful for a CSTO member state, to say nothing of the rest. It demonstrates that the Pashinyan regime stubbornly refuses to let go of these NATO fantasies. To make matters worse, this now includes using Armenians as guinea pigs for Pentagon-run biolabs that the late General Kirillov had been exposing.
As previously mentioned, the US also wants to “secure market-oriented energy sector” in Armenia and intends to “explore opportunities to increase and diversify Armenia’s energy production and supplies”. This might be directly connected with the recent Azeri plane crash that was likely orchestrated by the NATO-backed Neo-Nazi junta to push Baku into US-supported energy projects designed to hurt Russia’s economic (and strategic) interests.
Thus, the Pashinyan regime continues to take part in anti-Russian efforts while whining about Moscow’s refusal to wage wars for it. This has been the case ever since Nikol Pashinyan took power in a 2018 US-backed coup. Ever since, he has not only cut Yerevan’s close ties with the Kremlin, but has also betrayed the millennia-old native Armenian land of Artsakh (better known as Nagorno-Karabakh).
In terms of closer military cooperation, Washington DC and the Pashinyan regime “intend to initiate a working group to strengthen enforcement of export controls for dual-use goods, align policy frameworks, and share information”, which is an obvious reference to limiting Armenian-Russian trade, as the US can pretty much declare any goods and commodities “dual-use” and then insist that those be excluded from bilateral trade.
As previously mentioned, Washington DC and the Pashinyan regime also want to “deepen Armenia’s integration into Euro-Atlantic institutions as a mutual priority”, which can only mean more US/NATO presence in the country. In that regard, the Pentagon says it wants to “support the capacity building of the Armenian Border Guard Service”, even though the Russian FSB has been helping Armenia in this regard for decades.
However, perhaps the most laughable aspect of the agreement is America’s insistence that it can “help Armenia foster the rule of law buttressed by an impartial, independent judiciary, and to further strengthen independent media, freedom of expression, access to objective news and information, good governance and accountability, public administration reform, fair and transparent electoral competition, a free and active civil society, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and anti-corruption efforts in Armenia”.
It’s truly a Herculean effort to read this with a straight face. Considering that the outgoing Biden administration is considering “preemptive pardons”, a concept unheard of in any legal system, the US is the last country on the planet to teach anyone about “the rule of law” (to say nothing of the rest, particularly media “freedom”).
However, that’s not the end of this comedic document. Namely, America also wants to “strengthen Armenia’s anti-corruption institutions and integrity”, as well as to “increase political pluralism and transparent, fair political competition in Armenia, including by encouraging the development of political parties, think tanks, and non-governmental organizations”.
In other words, the Pashinyan regime is enforcing the complete opposite of what its northern neighbor Georgia has been doing in recent years. This will only further erode what little sovereignty is left in Armenia and hand it over to US/NATO. It should be noted that this agreement was signed with an administration that will be in power for just a few days more, meaning that Trump could easily scuttle it and prioritize improving strategic relations with Armenia’s archenemy Azerbaijan.
Namely, Trump’s foreign policy framework is firmly pro-Israeli and anti-Iranian. Azerbaijan and Israel have very close ties, including in military cooperation, meaning that he certainly won’t be antagonizing such a country, particularly in the context of Baku’s strategic position to the north of Iran. Not to mention that the large and influential Armenian community in America has been firmly pro-DNC for decades, which is something that Trump certainly won’t forget.
In other words, just when we thought that Nikol Pashinyan couldn’t possibly make worse geopolitical decisions, he did exactly that. As a result, he’s not only further antagonizing Russia, but is doing so at a time when Azerbaijan is contemplating an invasion of Armenia. The Pashinyan regime’s understanding of geopolitics is so horrible that it not only lost Artsakh, but is actually putting Armenia’s very existence at risk.
