The Fall of the House of Windsor?

I've just had a listen to Liberty Tactics latest. They make a very good point about 'is Kate in the car' - there is no one else in it, just the two of them!

Every senior royal always travels with a Royal Protection Officer, but if you take a look at https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1603549, it's just Kate/Pippa and her mother. Nope, wouldn't happen. Even Harry and Meghan always had an RPO in the car with them before they hoofed it across the Atlantic.

So, it must be Pippa in the car as she and her mother aren't entitled to an RPO.

Quote:

---

Posted by Brigantia

I've just had a listen to Liberty Tactics latest. They make a very good point about 'is Kate in the car' - there is no one else in it, just the two of them!

Every senior royal always travels with a Royal Protection Officer, but if you take a look at https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1603549, it's just Kate/Pippa and her mother. Nope, wouldn't happen. Even Harry and Meghan always had an RPO in the car with them before they hoofed it across the Atlantic.

So, it must be Pippa in the car as she and her mother aren't entitled to an RPO.

---

I had seen this mentioned on other sites and didn't mention it because once I found the picture of Pippa in the big sunglasses, there was not doubt in my mind that it was her in the car and not Kate. I read today that the photo was from an unauthorized camera person; so no need to even issue a retraction. Can this photo really fool the UK people who no doubt know what the "royals" really look like?

If king charles was in Canada, every medical professional he came in contact with would be non stop harassing him to agree to and take MAID.

MAID = Medical Assistance In Dying

I recently read that 60,000 Canadians were Euthanized this last year, and were part of the "MAID" program.

I have no words.

Quote:

---

Posted by AnitaT

If king charles was in Canada, every medical professional he came in contact with would be non stop harassing him to agree to and take MAID.

MAID = Medical Assistance In Dying

I recently read that 60,000 Canadians were Euthanized this last year, and were part of the "MAID" program.

I have no words.

---

I found figures for 2022 which indicated 13,241 "participants" but I can't find anything for 2023.
The 2022 report also state 44,958 had used the program since it started in 2016.

I think the 60,000 is probably about right for 2016-2023 period; not for just last year.
But of course these are the "official" numbers...

They did just decide to delay extending the program to those suffering only from mental illness so I'm safe for for a few years:)

Here's........Kate with her children. The first 'official' release since her surgery.
Cynics will say this could've been taken anytime, but perhaps we should just go with it...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68526972

@Mari - I am no expert, Heaven knows! - but my first impression of that photo is that Kate's face had been pasted-in... Quite skillfully, but it doesn't look "right".

If you really wanted to prove somebody was OK, they would appear in public with informed, credible and honest witnesses (if such people even exist in public life!).

A photo proves precisely nothing.

I've no idea what this whole thing wrt Kate is about - but it does seem to be about something.

Quote:

---

Posted by Bruce G Charlton

@Mari - I am no expert, Heaven knows! - but my first impression of that photo is that Kate's face had been pasted-in... Quite skillfully, but it doesn't look "right".

If you really wanted to prove somebody was OK, they would appear in public with informed, credible and honest witnesses (if such people even exist in public life!).

A photo proves precisely nothing.

I've no idea what this whole thing wrt Kate is about - but it does seem to be about something.

---

Re. the bold - exactly. Her legs look too short in this pic, but I guess it will satisfy the unquestioning masses.

The darkened zone of the middle child's woolly jumper thing , where Kate's head is (inserted) doesn't look naturally shadowed. It looks artificially darkened in photoshop to allow an easier insertion of Kate's head.

More interesting is the lack of her wedding ring !

Quote:

---

Posted by Brigantia

Quote:

---

Posted by Bruce G Charlton

@Mari - I am no expert, Heaven knows! - but my first impression of that photo is that Kate's face had been pasted-in... Quite skillfully, but it doesn't look "right".

If you really wanted to prove somebody was OK, they would appear in public with informed, credible and honest witnesses (if such people even exist in public life!).

A photo proves precisely nothing.

I've no idea what this whole thing wrt Kate is about - but it does seem to be about something.

---

Re. the bold - exactly. Her legs look too short in this pic, but I guess it will satisfy the unquestioning masses.

---

Yes, a photo proves nothing, but I do think the legs are hers. I'm reminded of Harry once describing his sis-in-law's legs as 'killer legs', quite shapely from the knee downwards and yes, because she's sitting forwards, this does have the effect of 'shortening' the legs, as you've observed. At the end of the day though, I think any photo 'released' of her is going to be under scrutiny and the only question about this one is when it was taken - could've been BS (before surgery) or AS (after, as of this pic)

That aside, she does look 'good' but I can't help feeling really sorry for this woman. Forget the royal trappings: anyone who poses on the front doorstep of a maternity hospital a few hours after giving birth, looking like a cover shot of vogue magazine, with blow-dried 'big' hair, immaculate makeup, rosy cheeked, smiling, high wedge heels, oh and cradling a baby in her arms, set alarm bells ringing for me. As any new mother knows - no one looks that bloody good three to four hours after giving birth.

I think Kate has suffered a major nervous breakdown, with possible self-harm inflicted.

Remember - with all Kate & William's patronage about 'mental health', the Royals simply don't 'do' nervous breakdowns. They are very cagey about such things. They need to maintain the Royal Ideal.
I believe William was completely blindsided by his wife's mental collapse (no doubt remembering his mother Diana's mental state in the early years) and ordered a 'D' notice on his wife's condition - and he supposedly only visited his wife for 30 mins for the whole two weeks she was in hospital - with no sign of the children or Kate's parents having visited. Of course, we can't be sure if they did, but where was the harm in showing the world pictures of family visiting....if they did? If they didn't, then it's perfectly reasonable to want to keep the kids away from their mother while she was in 'fragile' mental state, heaven knows I would.

The signs are there, for me anyway - the weight loss over the months, the media praising her at every turn, immaculate turnouts and outfits, fixed smiles all around and we have to remember, she's a commoner (horrible term, sorry) and even after years of marriage probably not fully bedded into royal life and William is a control freak, that much is known and is still traumatised by his mother's hounding by media etc. That'll never go away.
I think Charles having this cancer scare has put the cards finally on Kate's table and she now sees before her the imminent cage that will be her lot once she becomes Queen. Just my view, I do hope I'm wrong, but I have a bad feeling about her ability to cope. Her 'salvation', if there's any, is for William to recognise this and slim down the Monarchy drastically once he becomes king - starting by booting out the dinosaur courtiers and the useless, embarrassing Andrew.

Great post Mari; mental health issues would be taboo for the royals, apart from talking about it happening in the populace at large.

I wish I could find it now, but there was a vid on one of the newspaper websites of Kate talking to William at some outdoor event last autumn. They were all smiles, then he turns away from her and her smile morphed into a look that could kill. Something wasn't right there.

With all the misfortunes they are having, it appears that the edifice is crumbling. Maybe we should rename the thread 'The fall of the house of Windsor'.

Quote:

---

Posted by Bruce G Charlton

@Mari - I am no expert, Heaven knows! - but my first impression of that photo is that Kate's face had been pasted-in... Quite skillfully, but it doesn't look "right".

If you really wanted to prove somebody was OK, they would appear in public with informed, credible and honest witnesses (if such people even exist in public life!).

A photo proves precisely nothing.

I've no idea what this whole thing wrt Kate is about - but it does seem to be about something.

---

This story is all over the UK news (mainstream) and many asking for an explanation as to why the pictures have been edited…

Great spot Bruce…👍

https://news.sky.com/story/picture-a...cerns-13092352

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nipulated.html

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebr...-manipulation/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68526972

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-new...-kill-32320496

And many more….

As a keen gardener, I spotted the leaves on that tree behind them are green, the shape of the leaves not matching any evergreens which would possibly explain things, excepting azalea or rhododendron but it doesn't look like them, so it's likely this picture was taken last autumn or early winter.

Its time the palace stopped treating us like uninformed morons.
Sticking to the ' planned abdominal surgery' meme (yes, it's become that)
.....If - and a big IF, Kate was admitted to hospital for this, as the media have us believe, then there is a procedure that would result in a two week hospital stay and three months recuperation and that is a hysterectomy, indeed a major op. If so, why are the palace being 'coy' about that? Or maybe she's had bowel re-construct surgery - again, major and nothing to be 'coy' about.

So, I'm sticking to the 'mental' explanation as it neatly ties in to the uniform 'narrative' all across the media (word for word) and William's demeanor in the days after she was admitted.

And her response is….

“The Princess of Wales has apologised "for any confusion" after she admitted to "editing" a controversial Mother's Day image of her and her children.
In a statement released this morning, Kate said: "Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing.”

Really…why would you edit???

Oh boy oh boy, yes, why would she do that? She's a very talented photographer for heaven's sake and these alterations are amateur - as witnessed by the picture's early picking-apart.
The palace are going to have to do better than that. And if it's indeed you, Kate, then, going along with the game....you definitely have lost your touch.

It looks like a triple X coded message with the fingers & legs.

wiki

Quote:

---

XXX (stylized as xXx and pronounced Triple X) is a 2002 American action film directed by Rob Cohen, produced by Neal H. Moritz and written by Rich Wilkes. The first installment in the XXX film series, the film stars Vin Diesel as Xander Cage, a thrill-seeking extreme sports enthusiast, stuntman and rebellious athlete-turned-reluctant spy for the National Security Agency.

---

Link

Quote:

---

17:32. Sean David Morton said if you type Illuminati backwards into a search engine you’ll be directed to the NSA.

---

X code

Star of David

19.47

dailymail
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/03...0152700449.jpg

Mira Finch argues that with the history & scale of the Royal P.R. machine it should be assumed that all happenings,including the release of an "obviously photoshopped" pic., are being stagemanaged.
to the end of an "controlled demolition " of the monarchy.

"Rumours and theories abound, and a very obviously photoshopped image of Kate and kids released to the public to "reassure" us of her wellbeing has done nothing but fuel further speculation and doubt, given all the anomalies in the image (Charlotte's missing sleeve, a full flowering tree in March, Louis' weird hand).

It is my contention that all these apparent ructions in the Royal Family are being strategically stage-managed for a reason, and that they are not happening by accident: the Royal PR machine is one of the most sophisticated in the world, with centuries of experience, and they don't do things by accident.

Thus, we can be sure that they want us suspicious and speculating, they want us questioning the health and viability of key high-profile Royals, and they want our faith in the monarchic institution to exponentially decline."

Personally, I agree that it will all be stage- managed , for sure .
Here is her full article....

https://open.substack.com/pub/miri/p...utm_medium=web

The memes are starting to appear....

Echoing the below report: the effort to reassure the public that Kate is fine, and everything's fine, and situation normal. How are you?, has backfired. The controversial picture has now been retracted by multiple photo agencies.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=h9s-klv7Ffo

Kate Middleton was admitted to hospital in January of this year for major abdominal surgery. There are people reading this wondering the same as what I'm wondering. I don't assume they'd have gotten placebo, although at the same time I'd be surprised if they got the real thing. I don't think the Royals actually run anything, I think the Privy Council puppeteers them. But whatever's going on, the retraction of the photo by multiple photo agencies speaks volumes like a klaxon does.

Quote:

---

Posted by Seeclearly

Mira Finch argues that with the history & scale of the Royal P.R. machine it should be assumed that all happenings,including the release of an "obviously photoshopped" pic., are being stagemanaged.
to the end of an "controlled demolition " of the monarchy.

"Rumours and theories abound, and a very obviously photoshopped image of Kate and kids released to the public to "reassure" us of her wellbeing has done nothing but fuel further speculation and doubt, given all the anomalies in the image (Charlotte's missing sleeve, a full flowering tree in March, Louis' weird hand).

It is my contention that all these apparent ructions in the Royal Family are being strategically stage-managed for a reason, and that they are not happening by accident: the Royal PR machine is one of the most sophisticated in the world, with centuries of experience, and they don't do things by accident.

Thus, we can be sure that they want us suspicious and speculating, they want us questioning the health and viability of key high-profile Royals, and they want our faith in the monarchic institution to exponentially decline."

Personally, I agree that it will all be stage- managed , for sure .
Here is her full article....

https://open.substack.com/pub/miri/p...utm_medium=web

---

This could well be the strategy. I feel that with all the migrants being deliberately allowed into the UK (USA too) is to dilute and destroy our national identity - making it much much harder to fight back the overt tyranny that is coming...a weakened sovereignty is easily won over. Too, they want civil war. What better way to also achieve this is the removal of that which, for better or worse, binds many together. A monarchy which is often quoted as the 'envy of the world'.