Ok. It turns out to be true that I had mixed up Coleman with another "John". Going over his material, no, it is not something I have encountered.
He does not harp on "Illuminati" and makes low use of "bloodlines".
His thesis is that there is a chain of command, Committee of 300 --> Club of Rome --> Kissinger.
He rapidly criticizes "Open Conspiracy", but, I am not sure that is not what is going on here, in a limited hangout way.
Coleman:
Quote:
On 30th April 1981, I wrote a monograph disclosing the existence of the Club of Rome
identifying it as a Committee of 300 subversive body. This was the first mention of both
of these organizations in the United States.
Let's forgive him for perhaps not being in the country at the time. He is late to the party started by Limits to Growth:
In 1972, Meadows was on the MIT team that produced the global computer model "World3" for the Club of Rome, providing the basis for The Limits to Growth. The book reported a study of long-term global trends in population, economics, and the environment. The book made headlines around the world and began a debate about the limits of Earth's capacity to support human economic expansion—a debate that continues to this day. Meadows was the book's lead author, and it had three coauthors: her husband Dennis Meadows, Jørgen Randers, and William W. Behrens III.
We might say, well, that is their internal report, sent to maybe a few business schools and a target audience, not that well publicized. But then there is the famous enough Gianni Agnelli, owner, Fiat, to New York Times 1972:
Club of Rome, a Worldwide Organization
refers to additional funding from Volkswagen.
The NYT was all over the eastern seaboard. Highly respected and avidly followed at that. So, "those who read" found out about this, and, if interested, you could track down the report. The hard copy is still available for checkout from three local universities.
What seems most obvious from "Committee" is that he seems to have spliced in "300", where others typically place "Illuminati", "The Vatican", or "Jews".
He spams it into every single paragraph and never says what it is. He continually refers to "membership" without being able to say what of. Club of Rome has members who can be determined. But this amorphousness is supposed to command and instruct them.
The weight of his writing is mostly in the British usurping of early America, which we can find in membership lists of the Pilgrims' Society. It sounds strongly to me that, he either does not know the name of it, or does, and is covering it.
His allegation is this belief:
Quote:
Their final objective was the overthrow of the
U.S. Constitution and the merging of this country, chosen by God as HIS country...
He actually *does* name religious fundamentalists as a tentacle of this beast, but, he is not distinguishable from one.
He says:
Let us talk about actual case histories, the attempt to communize and deindustrialize
Italy. The Committee of 300 long ago decreed...
Where is this case history or what is the decree? All we get is:
This called for an attack upon Christianity...
is it the Fourth Crusade, or what?
As we go through, he does try to pin an "older" origin, but then somehow they are brand new because:
Quote:
Two of the Committee's earliest targets were Italy and Pakistan. The late Aldo Moro [1978]...
When threatening Moro, Kissinger was obviously
not carrying out U.S. foreign policy, but rather acting according to instructions received
from the Club of Rome, the foreign-policy arm of the Committee of 3OO
In my 1982 expose of this heinous crime, I demonstrated that Aldo Moro, a loyal member
of the Christian Democrat Party, was murdered by assassins controlled by P2 Masonry
with the object of bringing Italy into line with Club of Rome orders to deindustrialize the
country and considerably reduce its population...
This is entirely incorrect:
Quote:
The Club of Rome formulated all of
what NATO claimed as its policies
NATO's "collective security agreement" comes from the maneuver of Nazi Argentina into the UN, which is the only possible explanation for Alice Bailey's claim of it being guided by "a handful of adepts".
This also is entirely oblivious to Alice Bailey who uses both these:
Quote:
The name, New World Order, is seen as something developed as a consequence of the
Gulf War in 1991, whereas the One World Government is recognized as being centuries
old...
I have no idea what he means by that, Synarchy is from the 1880s, and otherwise you just have the British Empire, which could claim it circled the globe. Otherwise the United Nations is the only possible vehicle for such a thing.
He thinks highly of the Fiat family:
Quote:
Agnelli, a
member of an ancient Italian Black Nobility family of the same name, is one of the most
important members of the Committee of 300. He played a leading role in development
projects in the Soviet Union...
He strongly dislikes certain things:
Quote:
Illuminism (Moriah
Conquering Wind), the Cult of Dionysius, the Cult of Isis, Catharism, Bogomilism? This
elite group that also calls itself the OLYMPIANS (they truly believe they are equal in
power and stature to the legendary gods of Olympus, who have, like Lucifer their god, set
themselves above our true God)
He avoids mentioning Alice Bailey by name:
Quote:
A One World Government-New World Order with a unified church and monetary
system under their direction. Not many people are aware that the One World Government
began setting up its "church" in the 1920's/1930's, for they realized the need for a
religious belief inherent in mankind to have an outlet and, therefore, set up a "church"
body to channel that belief in the direction they desired.
He is off the track. An enormous amount of people are aware of Bailey one way or another. She totally is a kernel there.
We have volumes on this incident, which might help shed light on "who" was giving orders:
Quote:
The Committee of 300 ordered the Club of Rome to use Polish nationalism as a tool to
destroy the Catholic Church and pave the way for Russian troops to reoccupy the
country. The "Solidarity" movement was a creation of the Committee of 300's Zbigniew
Brzezinski, who chose the name for the "trade union" and selected its office holders and
organizers. Solidarity is no "labor" movement, although Gdansk shipyard workers were
used to launch it, but rather, it was a high-profile POLITCAL organization, created to
bring forced changes in preparation for the advent of the One World Government...
Here is certainly where the right wing says, well, these communists and the traitors are the same:
Quote:
We have been brainwashed into believing that
Communism is the greatest danger we Americans are facing. This is simply not so. The
greatest danger arises from the mass of traitors in our midst...
This would be a cue, if we unravel for ourselves what helped Coolidge attain office that had not been done before:
Quote:
In every election since Calvin Coolidge ran for the White House, the
Committee of 300 has been able to plant its agents in key positions in government so that
it matters not who gets the White House post. For example, every one of the candidates
who ran for the Presidency, from the time of Franklin D. Roosevelt, were selected, some
like to call it "hand picked," by the Council on Foreign Relations acting on the
instructions of the RIIA...
He hates The Beatles and credits Tavistock with the very words being spoken:
Quote:
Ed Sullivan who had been coached by the conspirators as to the role he was to play.
Nobody would have paid much attention to the motley crew from Liverpool and the 12-
atonal system of "music" that was to follow had it not been for an overabundance of press
exposure. The 12-atonal system consisted of heavy, repetitive sounds, taken from the
music of the cult of Dionysus and the Baal priesthood by Adorno and given a "modern"
flavor by this special friend of the Queen of England and hence the Committee of 300.
I am not sure he understands New York or that Astor was one of the last significant opponents to the Federal Reserve:
Quote:
John Jacob Astor made a huge fortune out of the China opium trade and then he went
respectable by buying up large tracts of Manhattan real estate with his dirty money.
During his lifetime Astor played a big role in the Committee of 300s' deliberations...
There are older "hints":
Quote:
...the Committee of 300 granted them a monopoly in the slave
trade in 1833.
Perkins the elder
was one of the first Americans to be elected to the Committee of 3OO
With that whole The Beatles and drugs thing, what has been omitted is that for example Bayer sold heroin over-the-counter since the 1880s, and cocaine was the main ingredient in Coca-cola or available as a headache powder. There wasn't exactly such a thing as "drugs" but anyone could see what was going on with alcohol. I suppose you could say The Beatles were important because of television, but for example rock and roll came out of Texas in the 1930s. Then because of oil and polyester, hemp was a threat, and so "drugs" became "bad". The Beatles are rolling around only about twenty years after some primarily American businessmen said drugs were bad.
Allegations along the same vein:
Quote:
All the Morgans and Perkinses were Freemasons, which was another
tie that bound them together, for only Free-masons of highest rank have any hope of
being selected by the Committee of 300.
They are Gnostics, Cathars, members of the cult
of Dionysus, Osiris, or worse. To them, "ordinary" people are there to be used for their
purposes. Their high-priests, Bulwer-Lytton and Aldous Huxley, preached the gospel of
drugs as a beneficial substance.
The closest thing I can find to an explanation of what he means is something like this:
Quote:
The Committee of 300 is for the most part under the control of the British
monarch, in this case, Elizabeth II.
This then, is the all powerful OLYMPIAN GROUP whose power
base is in London and the City of London's financial centers
But the best proof I can offer of the existence of the Committee of 300 is the Rank
Organization which, in conjunction with Eagle Star, IS THE BRITISH CROWN
Lord Peter Carrington, who pretends to be an
Anglican Christian but who is a member of the Order of Osiris and other demonic sects,
including Freemasonry, installed as a Knight of the Garter at St. George's Chapel,
Windsor Castle, by Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II of England, of the Black Nobility
Guelphs, also head of the Anglican Church, which she thoroughly despises."
The Knights of the Order of the
Garter are the INNERMOST circle of the most corrupt public servants who have utterly
betrayed the trust placed in them by their nation, their people.
The Knights of the Order of the Garter are the leaders of the Committee of 300, Queen
Elizabeth II's most trusted "privy council."
Palmerston, like
so many of his kind, was not only a Freemason, but a dedicated servant of Gnosticism....
Like the present 'royal family,' Palmerston made a pretense of being a Christian but was
in fact a servant of Satan.
I, at least, partially agree with something here. That is, a nemesis erupting from London. Here, we can easily reveal a "wasn't there before, has been ever since":
The Ghost of Oliver Cromwell and the Bank of England 1694.
Those are Olympians -- Immortals.
Again he still falls silent on Bailey or The Synarchy:
Quote:
Above all, the battle is a spiritual one. Unfortunately, the Christian churches have become
little more than social clubs run by the infinitely evil World Council of Churches (WCC),
whose beginnings lie not in Moscow but in the City of London, as we see from the chart
at the end of the book which gives the structure of the One World Government Church.
This body was set up in the 1920's to serve as a vehicle for One World Government
policies, and stands as a monument to the long-range planning capabilities of the
Committee of 300.
Is this the set-up of evil, WCC?
Quote:
In 1920, the former Ecumenical Patriarch of the Eastern Orthodox Church, Germanus V of Constantinople, wrote a letter "addressed 'To all the Churches of Christ, wherever they may be', urging closer co-operation among separated Christians, and suggesting a 'League of Churches', parallel to the newly founded League of Nations". Church leaders agreed in 1937 to establish a World Council of Churches, based on a merger of the Faith and Order Movement (under Charles Brent of the Episcopal Church of the United States) and Life and Work Movement (under Nathan Söderblom of the Lutheran Church of Sweden) organisations.
Its official establishment was deferred with the outbreak of World War II...
Fortunately, we can get one more rip on Britain:
Quote:
From 1776 when Jeremy Bentham and William Petty, the Earl of Shelburne, fresh from
the triumph of the French Revolution which they planned and ran, were drafted by the
British Crown to bring their combined experience to bear against the colonists, to 1812
when the British sacked and burned Washington, destroying secret documents that would
have exposed the treason being worked against the young United States of America...
For me personally, I kind of agree with this guy but think he is going overboard with:
pro-unspecified Christianity (particularly God is the Constitution), anti-pagan anything
near panic about Tavistock and music
Those are in their turn just a different kind of social engineering. Or, it sounds like values he wants to promote, that we should feel expected to follow.
Cromwell was a Puritan, the Puritans are the Pilgrims, who settled around Boston, which he trounces heavily. His "300" kind of works, if we replace it with "Pilgrims" in the majority of cases. If we fill in the details with information from the public domain, then it would be largely correct.
There would remain a few glaring errors, such as when he talks about being the first to speak of Club of Rome, I don't know how to correct that.
