This is the truth as far as the industry is concerned: 'It does not matter what the health effects are because we are going to implement 5G irregardless anyway.'
Printable View
This is the truth as far as the industry is concerned: 'It does not matter what the health effects are because we are going to implement 5G irregardless anyway.'
Unless there's a miracle, we're going through a 'destruction test'. They don't care how many of us they turn into smoke and ashes while they whittle us down to a remaining small cluster that match their desired tick list of attributes on their mad genius wish list.Quote:
Posted by Ernie Nemeth
These bastards, typical faux scientists, are brilliant at focusing in on a conjured objective, in absolute denial, or is it ignorance, of their 359.999 degree blind spot.
If only 1 percent of us prove to be resilient to the insane amount of abuse they intend to inflict upon us, they will cheer and celebrate that they have done a wonderful thing.
https://i0.wp.com/stralingsleed.nl/w...size=700%2C441
- Activated by 5G Pulsed Microwave Radiation?
Is there graphene in the Corona vaccines and are they active by the 5G frequencies? factchecknederland.afp.comThis is very quickly contradicted. The saying goes: where there is smoke, there is fire (=where there are rumors of wrongdoing, there must be something wrong)
Ionizing radiation is naturally present, but can also come from artificial sources. Radiation from natural sources is called background radiation.
- Sources of ionizing radiation
-Cosmic rays from the universe. Cosmic rays come from the sun and from sources outside the solar system. At high altitudes, cosmic rays are less shielded by the atmosphere;
- Radiation from natural sources
-Radiation from the bottom. Radiation from the soil is called terrestrial radiation. It is emitted by certain minerals in the soil. A radioactive noble gas, radon, is also released from the soil into the air that we breathe. The amount of radiation from the soil and the amount of radon is low in the Netherlands. This has to do with the favorable soil type in the Netherlands.
-Medical care. During medical examinations, people may be briefly exposed to radiation. For example, if the dentist makes X-rays of the teeth. Such a low dose of radiation is not dangerous. Sometimes radiation is deliberately applied, for example in radiotherapy with radioactive isotopes in breast cancer or prostate cancer. The radiologist ensures an optimal consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of applying radiation;
- Radiation from artificial sources
-Industry. Industry uses radiation, eg nuclear installations to generate energy (nuclear power plants) and nuclear research reactors to produce isotopes for industrial and medical applications, also use radioactivity.
https://i0.wp.com/stralingsleed.nl/w...size=700%2C268
Ionizing radiation can cause damage to tissues, and DNA autoriteitnvs.nl/onderwerpen/straling/ioniserende-straling-bronnen-en-effecten
- Effects on humans
The fifth column or LA QUINTA COLOMNA is a free thought movement founded by Ricardo Delgado Martin. Graduated in statistics from the University of Seville (Spain). Measurements with analog Geiger counters* have ended up at La Quinta and it appears that ionizing radiation has been measured around 5G antennas. Together with Dr. José Luis Sevilla has Ricardo Delgado's thoughts on this. Indeed, a 5G antenna is supposed to emit non-ionizing radiation, as the Telecom providers say, and yet Geiger counters reveal that these antennas emit ionizing radiation.
- The fifth column
*The Geiger counter (also called Geiger-Müller counter, Geiger-Müllertel tube, GM tube or GM counter) is a radiation detector that can be used to measure ionizing radiation.
Ultraviolet (abbreviated UV, also called ultraviolet radiation, black light or UV light) is electromagnetic radiation after visible light. The wavelength after visible light is becoming shorter and more energetic. With regard to the effects of ultraviolet light on humans and the environment, a distinction is made between;
- Ionizing radiation from UV light
-UV A. Uv A is ultraviolet radiation with a wavelength between approximately 315 and 400 nm,
-UV B. Uv B has a wavelength between 280 and 315 nm
-UV C. Uv C has a wavelength between 100 and 280 nm (“ short-wave radiation").
Radiation with a shorter wavelength (between 10 and 100 nm) does not fall in the UV spectrum, but belongs to the so-called soft X-rays. This is where (on paper) the ionizing radiation starts!
https://i2.wp.com/stralingsleed.nl/w...size=700%2C455
Among the theories that have been put forward, there is the possibility that the graphene in the environment (dispersed by chemtrails) is being stimulated by the non-ionizing waves emitted by the 5G antennas. It is also possible that the antennas themselves have graphene plates or something similar in their structure that multiply the signal so that it comes within the ionization range. Graphene is a layer of carbon atoms packed in the form of contiguous hexagons, such as a honeycomb. The material is extremely thin, virtually transparent, extremely flexible and much stronger than, for example, steel. Graphene could make the internet a hundred times faster and a camera sensor a thousand times more sensitive. Its appearance is determined by the way the carbon atoms are arranged. These atoms form hexagons,making graphene look like a honeycomb or chicken wire under a very strong microscope. Graphene is therefore sometimes jokingly referred to as 'nano chicken wire' nemokennislink.nl/publicaties/grafeen
- Graphene or 'nano chicken wire'
Oxide Graphene oxide (GO) is the oxidized form of tombstone. That is, graphene functionalized with groups containing oxygen.
- Graphene
The latest developments and discoveries with regard to graphene (oxide), and the major role that this substance seems to play in the construction of the 'operating system' that is under the guise of 'Covid-19 vaccines' will be injected into people step-by-step, so that everyone will be unsuspectingly integrated with a global Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Artificial Intelligence (AI) controlled 5G/6G network.
- 'Graphene nanotubes in Corona vaccines are activated by 5G frequencies and change brain processes'
* Artificial intelligence (AI) is the foundation for mimicking human intelligence by creating and applying algorithms built into a dynamic computing environment. Simply put, AI attempts to make computers think and react as if they were humans.
Quote:
The major news media still claims that a link between graphene (oxide) and Covid-19 is an unproven 'conspiracy theory', but nothing could be further from the truth. The Spanish company Graphena produces various materials and chips made of graphene and in March 2020 the company offered free graphene for the 'treatment of Covid-19'.
The EU is funding the overarching Graphene Flagship graphene-flagship.eu with € 1 billion , to which various Dutch universities are also affiliated. And Graphene Flagship launched a special 'Covid-19 Task Force'. It investigated how the body could be 'protected' with graphene and how the material could be used to make society 'Covid-resistant'.
In Spain, university researchers recently discovered that the Pfizer vaccine contains a very high concentration of graphene oxide (coronazwendel.nl/2021/07/05/spaanse-universitaire-spreis-ontdekken-grafeenoxide-nanoparticles- in-pfizer-vaccin-xandernieuws/ and groningerkrant.nl/opinie/column-sars-cov-2-feitelijk-grafeenoxidetoxic/ ). This was confirmed in at least two other studies.
- Graphene oxide discovered in Pfizer vaccines
However, it is still unclear whether Pfizer has added graphene oxide in all batches worldwide. Since the vaccine manufacturers have officially been given complete free rein by the politicians to carry out these medical gene manipulation experiments on humanity, it is theoretically conceivable that in other countries there is no graphene oxide in the injections, but perhaps something else has been added that is not on the package inserts. will be mentioned. Further research into other batches is therefore urgently needed.
(Under the post-WWII Nuremberg Code agreed upon, medical experiments without fully informing recipients and expressly requesting their consent is a very serious crime against humanity for which military tribunals may hand out the death penalty.)
Riccardo Delgado (presenter of the online program LA QUINTA COLOMNA) and Dr Jose Luis Sevillano (GP) analyzed the now established and undeniable electromagnetism that arises in many people after they have been vaccinated. This effect is called magnetofection. Graphene has (electro-) magnetic properties, and in 2013 it was shown that the magnetism in graphene can be switched 'on' and 'off'. Delgado and Sevillano found that graphene oxide nanotubes in the injections adhere to synapses in the brain. In the study published by ScienceDirect https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32082970/ (2019) has already mentioned 'nanotubes' with which medicines (and therefore also 'vaccines') can be introduced into the body, which can also 'make a link with neurons and neuronal networks' in the brain.
- Graphene oxide nanotubes attach themselves to our brain
Riccardo Delgado: “It is possible to use the carbon nanotubes to create antennas for wireless communication at gigahertz (GHz) and terahertz (THz) wavelength (5G) and thus make people a willful victim. A human-robot! http://straalsleed.nl/blog/de-mens-voor-de-helft-een-computer-is-dit-de-toekomst/
A study by Rice University (Houston) shows that electric fields generated with Tesla coils can transfer energy to graphene nanoparticles, allowing them to act as a miniature power source, but above all to self-assemble in new, longer shapes. The 'behaviour' of graphene nanoparticles can therefore in principle be influenced from a distance by means of electric fields. (Remember in this context that it is the intention that not only every street, but probably also every home, gets its own 5G antenna).
- Graphene nanoparticles self-assemble under the influence of EM fields.
Graphene nanoparticles are not only sensitive to these types of electric fields, but can also serve as antennas for electromagnetic fields in the 5G and 6G range. In a study with human fibroblasts (cells found in our connective tissue) to which graphene nanoparticles had been added, exposure to electromagnetic radiation at frequencies of 900, 2400 or 7500 MHz (say 4G and 5G range) was shown to induce cell death.
The brain then becomes a receiver, but of what? Messages and instructions that give off or cause a certain stimulus, reaction, feeling or thought? Who hand out a reward or punishment? Do those people activate to do something, or make them immobile? Those people show or hear something that is not really there? That erase existing memories and knowledge, and implant false memories and knowledge? With 5G / 6G this is technically possible.
- Human/robot
So the possibilities for brain and behavioral manipulation will soon be literally limitless? With that, the great dream of all dictatorships finally comes true: TOTAL permanent control over ALL people, even over their behavior, their thoughts, their wishes and their desires? As a working person, do we have a choice to refuse the vaccination?
- Total permanent control over all people now very close?
herstelrepublic.wordpress.com/2021/08/14/alarm-you-become-radioactive-irradiated-everywhere/#more-77668
mcbspecials.eu/nl/blog/grapheen
coronazwendel.nl/2021/08/13/grapheen-nanotubes-in-vaccins-worden-door-5g-frequencies-active-en-veranderen-hersenkoppen-xandernieuws/
https://herstelderepublic.wordpress.com/2021 /07/17/covid-vaccine-inserting-receiving-antennas-let's-watch-what-is-happening-in-your-brain/
Photographer AlexanderAlUS via CC BY-SA 3.0
Photo wavelengths in nanometers : examenoverzicht.nl/natuurkunde/licht
Photo; icthealth.nl/blog/nano-vaccins-en-medicijncouriers-klein-maar-fijn/
This might not stop 5g, but it looks like it will result in a new location for the tower.
The Foley family, whose home is within a few metres of the mast, said they cannot describe what they are going through right now
https://www.rte.ie/news/munster/2021...43-kerry-mast/
LA QUINTA COLUMNA 1-ON-1: SPANISH RESEARCHER FIRST TO REVEAL GRAPHENE OXIDE
1/15/22
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/la-...raphene-oxide/
"Biostatistician Dr Ricardo Delgado of the La Quinta Columna dissident research group from Spain joins Stew Peters to discuss the contents of the vaxxine vials.
La Quinta Columna was the first group to report graphene oxide, which Dr Delgado says amplifies 5G signals within the body, from gigahertz to terahertz, which he thinks, in turn powers their self-assembly into the microchips, which are also found in the vaccine, over time.
Dr Delgado says that vaccinated people therefore emit lots of radiation and that an aspect of the “shedding” phenomenon, whereby unvaccinated people are made ill in the presence of those who are vaccinated has to do with these high levels of radiation.
He says that classic COVID symptoms match those described in the scientific literature as symptoms of radiation exposure. He does not believe the virus is real and notes that it has never been isolated from a human body.
He believes COVID symptoms are largely a result of the new 5G signals that are starting to come online all over the world. These fields can sicken the unvaccinated but their effect on the vaccinated is to make them even sicker.
Stew tells him about his recent bout with what was diagnosed as COVID and how he was treated with ivermectin and other alternative medications, which he says helped him. He asks Dr Delgado if COVID isn’t real, then how could these medications help him if what he was actually suffering from was radiation exposure?
Dr Delgado responds that many of these medications have the effect of bringing oxygen into the cells and they also support the immune system, which has been triggered by the radiation.
When asked if he his found anything like what Dr Carrie Madej and others have reported; of parasites and other biological life in the vials, Dr Delgado replies that he believes that these are synthetic biology, not actual living organisms.
He says his group hasn’t yet identified everything in the vials but they have been able to positively identify some things, such as micro antennae and micro routers, which he believes are what cause some of the vaccinated to emit MAC addresses.
Way back in mid-2015, I first began reporting on the videos of Level9News, which described plans by proponents of global governance at the World Economic Forum and the Bilderberg Group (both of which are headed by Klaus Schwab) to deploy a vast “neural net” that would turn human bodies into “nodes” on the Internet of Things.
At the time, she explained that this was being controlled and coordinated by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (GEOINT) but she didn’t know that vaccination would be the means by which this technology would be deployed."
Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vpwwx9
Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1476215
Posted by onawah
I was going to comment on this topic even without this latest video that was posted.
Stew asked the doctor a question similar to what I am going to ask now.
You can count on one hand, possibly two, the number of people who have gone public with their findings about the contents of the jabs.
I believe they are all being truthful with what they have discovered.
With all the doctors, scientists, lab experts, virologists, biologists etc. around the world that can
gain access to the ubiquitous jabs, one would think that there would be dozens and dozens or even hundreds who would have done this same research.
It's not very difficult at all. A microscope and discarded vial would be all that's required to examine the jab contents.
I can well understand the reluctance of people to go public with their findings under their own name.
Some type of reprisal would be almost guaranteed.
But there are many ways to release findings and still remain anonymous.
It puzzles me as to why we aren't seeing more people doing this research and
releasing it to the public.
Does anyone have any thoughts about this?
Thanks John.Quote:
Posted by ExomatrixTV
Posted by JackMcThorn
wow... I wonder how long it would have been before everyone living in this house became sick and died...?
https://img.rasset.ie/001a1c3f-800.jpg
the same applies to dwellings anywhere near these masts as well, I think... it's just not so obvious when it's down the road a little way away from a house...
If there were machine guns on top of lamp posts / cell phone masts... spinning round and firing bullets - the effects would be more or less the same - injury and death - but they can get away with the killer 5G because the pollution and the assault is invisible.... if there was something visible people would soon get rid of it by any means possible...
By T. Grant Benson -January 17, 20220105
https://breaking911.com/urgent-airli...VJlUEwB1XOrzxA
"AT&T and Verizon said Tuesday they will voluntarily limit 5G network around airports amid fears of flights disruptions.
Quote:
Verizon joins AT&T in delaying some 5G deployments near airports when it turns on its newest version of 5G service tomorrow as both companies work with the FAA and airlines on concerns over possible interference.
12.5K views
0:39 / 1:09
10:36 AM · Jan 18, 2022·Twitter Media Studio
The chief executives of major airlines in America Monday sent a letter to the White House warning of a potential “catastrophic” aviation crisis on Wednesday when AT&T and Verizon are scheduled to switch-on the new 5G services.Quote:
Kara Kenney
@KaraKenney6
·
Jan 18
#Breaking: Both
@ATT
and
@Verizon
will halt 5G deployment near airports following concerns from the aviation industry about potential impacts on air travel. Verizon statement:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJZ7pyAX...png&name=small
The CEOs reportedly said the 5G deployment “could potentially strand tens of thousands of Americans overseas.”
“Unless our major hubs are cleared to fly, the vast majority of the traveling and shipping public will essentially be grounded,” the leaders of American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, Southwest Airlines and others wrote in a letter, according to Reuters. “This means that on a day like yesterday, more than 1,100 flights and 100,000 passengers would be subjected to cancellations, diversions or delays.”
President Joe Biden issued a statement thanking the cell carriers for their delay near airports: “I want to thank Verizon and AT&T for agreeing to delay 5G deployment around key airports and to continue working with the Department of Transportation on safe 5G deployment at this limited set of locations.”
“This agreement will avoid potentially devastating disruptions to passenger travel, cargo operations, and our economic recovery, while allowing more than 90 percent of wireless tower deployment to occur as scheduled. This agreement protects flight safety and allows aviation operations to continue without significant disruption and will bring more high-speed internet options to millions of Americans. Expanding 5G and promoting competition in internet service are critical priorities of mine, and tomorrow will be a massive step in the right direction. My team has been engaging non-stop with the wireless carriers, airlines, and aviation equipment manufacturers to chart a path forward for 5G deployment and aviation to safely co-exist – and, at my direction, they will continue to do so until we close the remaining gap and reach a permanent, workable solution around these key airports.”
https://breaking911.com/wp-content/u....06.37-PM.jpeg
https://breaking911.com/wp-content/u....06.42-PM.jpeg
According to the report from Reuters, the letter was sent to White House National Economic Council director Brian Deese, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator Steve Dickson and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel."Quote:
Reuters U.S. News
@ReutersUS
EXCLUSIVE Major U.S. airline CEOs warn 5G could ground some planes, wreak havoc http://reut.rs/326ts1o
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJU99BNX...jpg&name=small
11:30 AM · Jan 17, 2022·True Anthem
39
Retweets
17
Quote Tweets
39
Likes
Funny how they were obviously able to do tests to these computer systems but the communications companies didn't feel any need to do tests to populations prior to their 5G rollout.Quote:
Posted by onawah
Americans for Responsible Technology
<info@americansforresponsibletech.org> via gmail.mcsv.net
1/21/22
https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/fdapetition
"Dear friends,
We'd like to remind you of three important things during these cold, dark days of winter.
1. The FDA Petition
Our FDA legal petition was filed on December 21st. We have not yet had a response from the FDA, which is not surprising. We fully expect the agency to reject our petition, forcing us to go to court (see below). Comments to the FDA are critical to the success of this action.
If you haven't had a chance to file your comment yet, it's not too late. You can find sample comments and instructions on how to file here.
https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/fdapetition
BTW, we've gotten some emails from people filing comments who are confused when asked "What is your comment about?" Since this is the FDA site, there is not (yet) an option to select "wireless radiation." If you are a medical professional, please select that choice. If not, we recommend you select "individual consumer."
Speaking of going to court, we are in the process of raising funds for the legal work required to move forward with our case. This effort demands a lot of historical research, and court costs and lawyers' fees add up quickly. If you are in a position to help contribute to our legal fund, we would very much appreciate your donation in any amount. Thank you!
CONTRIBUTE TO THE ART LEGAL FUND
2. Our work in Washington continues.
As you recall, the recent infrastructure bill passed by Congress contained a provision, written by the telecoms, that requires that all new local broadband projects must "support the deployment of 5G" to receive priority government funding.
The wireless industry claims, with a straight face, that its goal is to help close the digital divide, even though the industry has been red-lining minority communities for years, and never completed the job of connecting everyone with fiberoptic cable, which they promised and we all paid for through our phone bills.
This outrageous money and power grab by the telecom industry ($65 billion of your tax dollars) shows just how much influence it has in Washington, but it's a travesty that must be fixed!
ART is teaming up with like-minded organizations in Washington to demand congressional hearings and a change in the language of the law. Stay tuned.
3. It's all about the Code...
Any application for construction of a small cell antenna in your community will be subject to the code in place at the time of the application. If your town or city's code doesn't take advantage of the power given to local governments by Congress, you're out of luck.
Local governments can't prohibit 5G antennas - that's against the law. But they can - and should - arm themselves with language that gives them protection from the irresponsible placement of antennas in the community.
Our document on "Smart Planning Provisions" is based on information from some of the top attorneys in the field who know the law and the options that are available to local officials.
So don't let any municipal official tell you, "Our hands are tied by the FCC." If they do, ask them to invite ART representatives to meet with them and explain the options they have. There is no cost or obligation.
Thank you for your ongoing support for our efforts to protect individuals and communities from involuntary exposure to wireless radiation. We appreciate your feedback; let us know what more we could be doing to help, and follow our late-breaking news on social media.
Doug Wood
And the rest of the ART team!"
History of the Anti-Wireless Movement
1/26/22
Arthur Firstenberg <info@cellphonetaskforce.org>
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/w...s-Movement.pdf
https://ci4.googleusercontent.com/pr...WKf5g4NKVIRkkk
(To forward this newsletter via social media, copy and paste this link:
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/w...s-Movement.pdf )
"In 1996, when almost no one owned a cell phone, and WiFi had not yet been
invented, organizations formed to oppose wireless technology in order to protect
our world from an unprecedented assault. The telecommunications industry planned
to put a cell phone in the hands of every man, woman and child so they could
communicate instantaneously from any point on Earth to any other point on Earth.
In order to accomplish this, and for the first time in the history of the planet, every
square inch of the Earth was going to be bathed in microwave radiation at all times.
Also every human being -- all seven billion of us – were going to become sources of
such radiation. This was also unprecedented. Human beings, like all other creatures,
were part of nature, not its enemy. But for the first time in the history of the Earth,
every member of one of its species was going to be emitting radiation wherever they
went.
Today, in 2021, when almost everyone owns a cell phone, WiFi, and an average of
23 other wireless devices, both the organizations and their goals have changed.
Health and nature have already been destroyed, and the fight is no longer against
wireless technology but, often, against each other. The purpose of this article is to
review this history in order to remind people of the purpose of our movement and to
unify and redirect global action once again to where it needs to be: against all of
wireless technology in order to stop the radiation and recover our health and
environment before it is too late. I will focus this article on the opposition in the
United States because I am most familiar with it, but similar dynamics have been
operating in other countries.
2
On February 8, 1996, the Telecommunications Act was signed into law, mandating
the rollout of wireless technology across America, and prohibiting local governments
from protecting their citizens’ health and environment from the radiation that it
produces. Both existing and new organizations all over the United States united to
oppose wireless technology and to try to restore democracy.
The EMR Alliance, which until that time had focused on radiation from power lines
and computers, now directed its energies to fight cell towers. Citizens for the
Appropriate Placement of Telecommunications Facilities was organized. I helped
found the Cellular Phone Task Force to oppose not just cell towers but cell towers’
reason for being, which is cell phones. Other organizations that formed included Noe
Valley Families Against the Antennas; Healthy Home Alliance; Families for
Appropriate Cellular Tower Siting; Ulysses Citizens for Responsible Technology;
Hardwick Action Committee; Thistle Hill Neighborhood Alliance; Coalition of
Concerned Citizens for Responsible Technologies; Citizens of Marin for Sensible
Communications Planning; Northboro Residents for Responsible Tower Siting;
Telecommunications Master Plan Coalition of San Francisco; and Rainier Valley
Association for Safe Wireless Technology. These and other groups, individuals, public
officials, and the Communications Workers of America, joined together to sue the
Federal Communications Commission in order to protect health, nature and
democracy.
In 2000, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against us, and the Supreme Court
refused to hear our case.
In the aftermath of our failure, a national coalition called the EMR Network was
formed to try to unify efforts to protect us all against radiation. But in the five years
since the passage of the Telecommunications Act, a majority of the population had
acquired cell phones, and many had also acquired WiFi, which had recently been
invented. Cracks formed in the coalition, which was beginning to split into factions.
One faction still opposed all of wireless technology. Another opposed cell towers but
not cell phones, as if one could exist without the other, and as if the radiation did not
come from both. A third represented the interests of people who called themselves
electrically sensitive. And not only were there differences of opinion among us, but
outside interests had infiltrated our movement and helped to divide us.
The EMR Alliance, which had previously functioned as a national coalition, vanished.
Its corporate counsel, Michael Withey, was the head of a national network of
personal injury lawyers hunting for million dollar lawsuits, called the Electromagnetic
3
Radiation Case Evaluation Team (EMRCET). When those lawyers concluded that ours
was a losing cause and there was no money to be made from lawsuits about
electromagnetic radiation, EMRCET disbanded, and the EMR Alliance also
disappeared.
Another lawyer, James Hobson, who had represented most of the parties before the
Second Circuit, and who became counsel for the EMR Network, was a
telecommunications lawyer who, simultaneous to representing the parties against
the FCC, represented a number of telecommunications companies, as well as the
Telecommunications Industry Association, on other matters. He had also previously
been in-house counsel for the FCC.
George Carlo, a lawyer as well as a scientist, who had headed up the
telecommunications industry’s effort to prove cell phones safe, made headlines
when he switched sides and wrote a book condemning cell phones as dangerous. It
was titled Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age. He attempted to join the
national coalition against wireless technology, but like Hobson, not everyone trusted
him. He had spent most of his career as a scientist-for-hire working for major
polluters. In addition to being hired by the Cellular Telecommunications Industry
Association to prove cell phones safe, he had been a consultant to the Tobacco
Institute, Dow Chemical, Dow Corning, the Chlorine Institute and other polluters and
published articles for two decades purporting to show that tobacco smoke, breast
implants, dioxins, herbicides, and other chemicals were not dangerous.
Eventually the EMR Network, beset by internal quarreling, broke up and yet another
coalition, called the EMR Policy Institute, formed. And gradually, over the years, as
the wireless industry’s adversaries came more and more to also be its customers,
they abandoned, for the most part, the fight to protect human health, nature, and
democracy. Many opponents of cell towers today are not only not opposed to cell
phones, but they are heavily addicted to them and have damaged their health from
years of exposing themselves to their radiation. The birds, insects and animals have
already disappeared from their yards and they have grown used to living without
them. I used to get more calls asking how to help fight wireless technology. Now,
more often, people call me or email me from their cell phones asking me what is the
safest kind of cell phone to use, how far away from their body to hold it, what kinds
of devices will best neutralize the radiation, and how to distinguish a 5G tower from
a 4G tower. When I tell them that radiation is radiation, that there is no way to
“neutralize” it, that distance doesn’t matter, and that it is destroying the Earth
regardless of what you call it, they don’t understand what I am saying. More and
4
more, they ask, in frustration, “What is the alternative?” And when I answer that the
alternative to not having a cell phone is the imminent, well-under-way destruction of
all life on Earth, including their own, they don’t seem to register what I am saying.
They simply can’t imagine living without a cell phone. ECHOEarth (End Cellphones
Here On Earth), an organization that I helped create in May 2020 in order to build a
movement to abandon wireless technology, still has fewer than 2,000 members
although 300,000 people and organizations have signed the International Appeal to
Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.
Meanwhile the EMR Policy Institute has also disappeared and a lot of new
organizations have taken its place. The focus of many is not to stop wireless
technology, or even cell towers, any more, but just to stop the newest version of
them, which is called “5G”. There is an international coalition called Stop 5G
International. In the United States there are Stop 5G Chicago, Stop 5G San Diego,
Stop 5G Hawaii, Stop 5G Georgia, 5G Free California, 5G Free Vermont, 5G
Awareness Now, 5G Colorado Action, Citizens Against 5G Cell Towers, and dozens of
other organizations with similar names. For many it is not because they no longer
think radiation is harmful, but because they have given up trying to stop it, and
because most of their members own cell phones.
And there are still outside interests assuming positions of leadership in our
movement, and telecommunications lawyers representing us in court. Children’s
Health Defense, directed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is doing wonderful advocacy
work. However, it has been represented in its legal work against 5G by Scott
McCollough, a telecommunications lawyer. Like George Carlo and James Hobson, he
claims to have switched sides, but his website does not say anything of the sort, and
he has told me that he does not believe RF radiation harms everyone, just people
with electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
And there is a new national coalition that is now filling the void left by the EMR
Policy Institute. It holds Zoom meetings every other Friday, and has invited a series
of excellent speakers to present at these meetings. But they are only speaking to the
choir, and the organizer of that coalition, Odette Wilkens, is a technology lawyer who
makes her living representing IBM. IBM is the company that launched a “Smarter
Planet” campaign in 2008 and a “Smarter Cities Challenge” in 2010. Everything IBM
does today depends on cell phones and wireless technology. I have asked Odette
whether she has a conflict of interest, but she has not responded. She is also an
animal rights activist for which I admire her and I would like to be able to trust her,
but she has give me no reason to do so.
5
Odette tried to sabotage the amicus brief that was filed in support of our current
petition to the U.S. Supreme Court. She convinced the coordinator of the amicus
brief not to file it, after a lot of organizations had already signed on and people had
already donated money toward it, so that I had to find another organization on short
notice to take over the effort and get it filed. She told a lot of people why not to sign
on to the amicus brief and why not to donate money toward it. It was after she did
this that I investigated her and discovered who she works for. Her new website,
wiredbroadband.org, doesn’t even have her name anywhere on it. In an interview (at
37:55) she said, falsely, that the preemption clause in the Telecommunications Act,
which we are again asking the Supreme Court to strike down, does not apply to 5G
and that people should not worry about it. She said that local governments are free
to prohibit 5G towers to protect our health and environment because they provide
“broadband” services and not “cell phone” services.
But that is false. Today “cellular” and “broadband” have merged and there is no
difference. 5G provides both voice and internet services. And the preemption clause
does not say “cell towers,” it says “personal wireless service facilities,” which
encompasses everything. We are back before the Supreme Court after twenty years
asking it, again, to strike down that clause, in order to restore to local governments
the right to protect our health and environment, and impose liability on
telecommunications companies that injure and kill people. In 2000, the Second
Circuit addressed only the issue of States’ Rights. Today we are asking for our
Personal Rights to life, liberty, and property. And in our petition to the Supreme
Court we are represented not by telecommunications lawyers, but by lawyers with
expertise in environmental law and civil rights.
The radiation emitted by cell phones is more, not less harmful than the radiation
emitted by cell towers. There are 15 billion mobile devices in the world, and only
seven million towers. And the phones are right next to everyone’s body. The main
difference is that people have become used to them. People have become used to
the absence of butterflies and sparrows. People have become used to being fat and
diabetic, and at risk for heart attacks and strokes. By this newsletter I am reaching
out to all organizations and people who love this Earth. I ask them to remember
what they are fighting for and to unite together in a campaign to abandon wireless
technology and eliminate cell phones from this planet in order to save it. Cell phones
are not the only threat to life on Earth, but they are the most urgent.
Cell phones are effectively radioactive devices. The idea that they are not radioactive
comes from a mistaken distinction that the medical community made a century ago,
6
which most people persist in believing despite a century of research showing that
distinction to be little more than a fantasy. It is a fantasy that says that (a) only
radiation above a certain frequency is energetic enough to remove electrons from
molecules to form ions, (b) this causes genetic mutations which are the cause of
cancer, and (c) radiation is harmless if it does not cause cancer.
The most obvious of those fictions is that radiation has no effects besides cancer.
Whereas in fact radiation acts directly on the electrons in our mitochondria, slowing
metabolism, making us hypoxic, and causing diabetes, heart disease and, yes, cancer.
Radiation also acts directly on all the electric transmission lines in our bodies,
including our nerves, our blood vessels, our heart’s pacemaker, and yes -- even
though western medicine doesn’t recognize their existence -- our acupuncture
meridians. All this plays havoc with life and in just 26 years has wiped out most of the
Earth’s insects, a large percentage of the small birds, and is imminently threatening
to put an end to what’s left -- including us -- if we do not put an end to it.
Please work with me on a campaign to abolish cell phones. It is necessary, it is
realistic, and the alternative is unthinkable. Thousands of people have written to me
over the past few years asking how they can help. You can all help to begin this
movement by throwing away your cell phones and joining ECHOEarth. As soon as
enough people have joined ECHOEarth so that it has strength in numbers, I will
contact the people who want to work on this in earnest and we can discuss the next
steps."
Arthur Firstenberg
Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
Administrator, International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space
Caretaker, ECHOEarth (End Cellphones Here On Earth)
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129
info@cellphonetaskforce.org
January 26, 2022
Could 5G really stop your plane taking off?
https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2022/0...cation-issues/
Several international airlines recently cancelled flights into certain US airports over concerns the rollout of 5G mobile communication technology could interfere with some planes' equipment. After warnings about the potential problem from aviation bosses and the Federal Aviation Administration, telecommunications companies AT&T and Verizon delayed activating some 5G masts around US airports...
Why 5G Is Dangerous for Planes — and People
01/28/22
By Jeremy Loffredo
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...9-f9034d1d1971
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg
"On the latest episode of Del Bigtree’s “The HighWire,” Dafna Tachover, attorney and founder of We Are The Evidence, explained how 5G technology could have catastrophic impacts on airplane safety equipment and why it’s so harmful to human health.
On the latest episode of Del Bigtree’s “The HighWire,” Dafna Tachover, attorney and founder of We Are The Evidence, explained how 5G technology could have catastrophic impacts on airplane safety equipment and why it’s harmful to human health.
The interview followed news last week that executives from the biggest U.S. airlines warned of an impending “catastrophic” aviation crisis unless the Biden administration intervened in plans by AT&T and Verizon to deploy 5G technology near major airports.
Tachover explained how 5G differs from other versions of wireless technology. “1G was calls, 2G was calls and text, 3G was calls, texts and some data, 4G was calls, texts and a lot of data,” she said.Quote:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
It’s unfortunate that advocates for human health and the environment don’t have the robust lobbying power of the airline industry. The damages to the human and natural biomes from WiFi dwarf the impacts of its interference with aviation altimeters.
childrenshealthdefense.org
Airlines Ask Biden to Delay 5G Rollout, Warn of ‘Catastrophic Aviation Crisis’
Executives from the biggest U.S. airlines asked the Biden administration for "immediate intervention" in today’s scheduled rollout of 5G technology near major airports, warning of an impending...
12:36 PM · Jan 19, 2022·Twitter
Tachover said 5G is a concept, not just a technology. “It’s a concept of infrastructure that’s supposed to allow the Internet of Things, driverless cars and anything and everything else moving forward,” she explained.
Tachover said:
“We’re going to interconnect tens of billions of devices. Everything in our house and our environment is going to communicate and intercommunicate … Your laptop will talk to your refrigerator, your laundry machine to your tea kettle.”
Tachover told Bigtree even the most mundane objects will be connected to the internet, even diapers — a small sensor and antenna sends an alert to the mother’s smartphone every time a baby poops.
“So all of these devices will be interconnected and for that we need a much more intense infrastructure of antennas … and that is what 5G is,” she said.In the beginning, telecommunication giants thought they would run 5G off of millimeter-wave networks, Tachover said. But the industry ran into a problem. The millimeter-wave networks are easily obstructed by different environmental factors, such as trees, houses and walls — so they fail to reach medium to long distances.
“So you would need to put many more antennas in very close proximity in order to have this network function,” Tachover said.
So the telecom industry moved to buy lower frequencies, known as the C band frequencies, from the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) for their so-called “next-generation wireless networks.”
The C band frequencies travel faster and further than the frequencies on which the telecom industry originally planned to build the 5G network.
Before telecom industry giants purchased the C band frequencies in 2021, the frequencies were used primarily by the military, Tachover said.
“The purchase forced the military to change the frequency used by their communication equipment to make way for Verizon, AT&T and their Internet of Things,” she said.
The only problem, said Tachover, is that commercial airlines also use these C band frequencies for their safety communication equipment — a fact no one considered until very recently.
“So the military got off of the [C band] because it was being sold, but no one talked to the airlines?” asked Bigtree.
“Correct,” said Tachover. And the risk is that the antennas and technology that commercial airplanes use to measure and communicate altitudes and weather systems is the same frequency that the telecom industry plans to put its network on.
“When you have two antennas that use the same frequency there’s going to be interference,” she said. “That is clearly a huge risk,” she said.
Tachover said the Federal Aviation Administration ordered a halt to the 5G implementation, but at only 50 airports, out of 5,217 public airports in the U.S.
“What about all of the other ones?” she said. “And it’s not even the main airports.”
Tachover explained:
“It seems the telecommunications industry has so much power, they’re allowed to endanger planes, air traffic and people in order to bring download speeds from 10 seconds to 2 seconds. How can that be more important than safety? … It’s outrageous.”
Tachover said wireless technology regulations are outdated, especially when it comes to the impact of the technology on human health.
She said:
“The FCC adopted health guidelines on radio frequency or wireless technology in 1996, and since 1996, the FCC has not updated its guidelines despite thousands of studies, including government studies, showing clear evidence [of harm].”
In 2013, a federal court forced the FCC to open an online public forum, asking whether or not the commission should review the outdated guidelines.In the beginning, telecommunication giants thought they would run 5G off of millimeter-wave networks, Tachover said. But the industry ran into a problem. The millimeter-wave networks are easily obstructed by different environmental factors, such as trees, houses and walls — so they fail to reach medium to long distances.
“So you would need to put many more antennas in very close proximity in order to have this network function,” Tachover said.
So the telecom industry moved to buy lower frequencies, known as the C band frequencies, from the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) for their so-called “next-generation wireless networks.”
The C band frequencies travel faster and further than the frequencies on which the telecom industry originally planned to build the 5G network.
Before telecom industry giants purchased the C band frequencies in 2021, the frequencies were used primarily by the military, Tachover said.
“The purchase forced the military to change the frequency used by their communication equipment to make way for Verizon, AT&T and their Internet of Things,” she said.
The only problem, said Tachover, is that commercial airlines also use these C band frequencies for their safety communication equipment — a fact no one considered until very recently.
“So the military got off of the [C band] because it was being sold, but no one talked to the airlines?” asked Bigtree.
“Correct,” said Tachover. And the risk is that the antennas and technology that commercial airplanes use to measure and communicate altitudes and weather systems is the same frequency that the telecom industry plans to put its network on.
“When you have two antennas that use the same frequency there’s going to be interference,” she said. “That is clearly a huge risk,” she said.
Tachover said the Federal Aviation Administration ordered a halt to the 5G implementation, but at only 50 airports, out of 5,217 public airports in the U.S.
“What about all of the other ones?” she said. “And it’s not even the main airports.”
Tachover explained:
“It seems the telecommunications industry has so much power, they’re allowed to endanger planes, air traffic and people in order to bring download speeds from 10 seconds to 2 seconds. How can that be more important than safety? … It’s outrageous.”
Tachover said wireless technology regulations are outdated, especially when it comes to the impact of the technology on human health.
She said:
“The FCC adopted health guidelines on radio frequency or wireless technology in 1996, and since 1996, the FCC has not updated its guidelines despite thousands of studies, including government studies, showing clear evidence [of harm].”
In 2013, a federal court forced the FCC to open an online public forum, asking whether or not the commission should review the outdated guidelines."
Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vqnyx7/?pub=ijro7
2/2/22
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/5g-...fizer-vaccine/
"This latest Greg Reese video about the findings of La Quinta Columna (the Fifth Column) is of interest for both the injected and the non-injected, because we all need to know what is in them and their potential effects. Those who are able to survive the procedure may find they are no longer in control of their own will.
***
TRANSCRIPT
The Fifth Column recently published their findings and conclusions on the strange, self-assembling nanotech they discovered in the Pfizer mRNA vaxxines via optical microscopy analysis.
The objects they found in the vaxxine correspond with known items in the scientific record and the conclusion they come to seems quite clear: that the well-documented scientific goal to use nanotechnology in living human beings to form networks capable of controlling several nano machines is currently being deployed in the CoV-19 vaxxines, which amounts to the most intrusive assault against humanity in all of recorded history.
While the media and Government lie and cover for Big Pharma, the official ingredients are still unknown.
But we have thousands of brilliant scientists worldwide studying these experimental vaxxines. Some have died in highly-suspicious ways but most have been able to share their findings and the work shows us that graphene oxide is a key component in all of this.
There have been dozens of official documented studies on the use of graphene oxide related to how we see it being used here today, among other things, as a power converter.
Graphene. The one-atom thick hexagonally-arranged carbon atoms is the thinnest and strongest material known to man and an outstanding conductor of heat and electricity.
It can boost gigahertz frequencies into terahertz, which is exactly what these nanotech machines need for power.
In order to do this, the graphene first needs a frequency to power it and the optimal frequency to externally power graphene is known to be 26 GHz, which is also the frequency put out by 5G.
In this model, the graphene within the body is activated by microwave signals in the gigahertz range, which it then boosts into the terahertz range, which then powers the novel nanotech machinery to self-assemble within the human body.
Once assembled, what do these nanotech machines do?
The images, compared to the scientific literature suggest that they are the foundation of an internal electronic system, with endless potential for biomanipulation of the human host.
Nano routers then emit MAC addresses, able to be registered via Bluetooth. Nano and plasma antennas, to amplify signals. Nano rectannnas, to act as rectifier bridges from AC to DC current, codecs and logic gates for encryption of communications.
The raw material for all this self-assembly is also graphene oxide, and when we compare known side effects of graphene oxide to the side effects of the CoV-19 vaxxines, we find them to be the same.
Once graphene oxide is injected into the body, it acquires magnetic properties, predictably, beside the injection site, the heart and the brain.
Graphene is seen as a pathogen by our immune system and will often result in paralysis and stroke. Graphene is known to cause blood clots and heart conditions.
Graphene oxide can generate small discharges, causing cardiac arrhythmia.
There is so much going on with these experimental vaxxines and the evidence seems clear that a mass experiment is going on, with certain batches marked more deadly than others.
And certain batches contain a bold new technology, akin to a manmade parasite, intended to control the host human, if it doesn’t kill them first, in the process.
Perhaps that is what the mad scientists and psychopaths are after: human genetics that can withstand this invasive and deadly nanotech."
Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vr6v2k/?pub=ijro7
- 5G Powered Graphene Based Nano-Tech in the Pfizer Vaccine:
Posted by onawah
I have working experience with computer chips building computers and also telephone circuits.
Integrated circuits are complex. They are manufactured under sterile conditions and take precision equipment to be manufactured.
If complex computer chips can self-assemble as is claimed to be taking place inside our bodies after being jabbed, then Intel, AMD and the other chip manufacturers could save a ton of money using the same technique to make their chips.
And they could do it without having to worry about body fluids hampering the process!!!
Just as demolition companies could save billions of dollars on explosives if they simply followed the 'create a fire and watch the building collapse' model shown to be effective on 9/11.
Please someone, anyone, explain how it is possible for these complex computer circuits to be manufactured in our bodies out of graphene oxide?
Quote:
Posted by DaveToo
2/6/22
https://rumble.com/vu93ri-geoenginee...-freeland.html
"Writer and lecturer, Elana Freeland, discusses the direction that our sophisticated technology is heading, and some of the challenges that humanity as a whole will be forced to confront.
If the World Economic Forum’s planned path for the world comes to fruition, human beings will live in a vastly different world than the one experienced today. Freedom of movement will be limited, synthetic biology will play a huge role, and human beings will no longer be natural. They will legally become classified as a new species: transhuman.
Is it too late to break away from the planned enslavement of the population, or is now the time to come together and fight the psychopaths before they are able to close the doors to the digital prison behind us?"
Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vrmxog/?pub=ijro7