Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Text:
Maria Zakharova:
“Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said he knows nothing about the glorification of Bandera in Ukraine.
What do you mean? What is the Israeli embassy in Kyiv doing then? And in Moscow too.
It turns out they have never reported the facts to the capital?
We will cite just a few of our numerous materials. Especially for the head of the Israeli Foreign Ministry - in English:
• On the origins of Ukrainian nationalism, crimes of OUN-UPA
• Regarding the Situation with the Glorification of Nazism and the Spread of Neo-Nazism and Other Practices That Contribute to Fueling Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance (Report of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation)
• Kiev regime crimes and human rights violations
• Ukrainian Nazism today: origin and mental and political typology
• Operation Ukraine: Bandera's Dark Shadow
• From Berlin to Maidan: 80 years on — Nazism gaining notoriety in Ukraine
• Inconvenient truth about the coup d'etat in Kiev
• On the 10th anniversary of the coup d'état in Kiev
• The Truth Behind Events in Ukraine and Donbass (2014-2022)”
https://x.com/Zlatti_71/status/1897189044280328289
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1897329513316716643
https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1897329520505770279
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Text:
🇨🇳🇪🇺 Europe Faces Heavy Costs Over Russian Asset Freeze as China Prepares to Pull $62 Trillion from EU Markets
Hong Kong is developing a new financial infrastructure platform to rival European securities depositories Euroclear and Clearstream, aiming to reduce reliance on Western systems, according to the Financial Times. The Hong Kong Exchange (HKEX) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) are upgrading the Central Money Market Settlement System (CMU) into an international depository capable of managing cross-border transactions and multiple currencies, including the Chinese yuan.
This move coincides with China’s potential withdrawal of $62 trillion in securities from European markets. Key figures:
- China’s debt securities market: $25 trillion total, with $5 trillion managed by CMU.
- Euroclear: Administers $42 trillion in assets.
- Clearstream: Handles $20 trillion.
The shift underscores efforts to reshape global financial dependencies amid escalating geopolitical tensions.
ukraine_watch
https://x.com/dana916/status/1897362506772885599
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Text:
A potential GAME CHANGER!!! 🔥
“🇨🇳🇪🇺 China is preparing to withdraw $62 trillion worth of its securities from the European market.
Hong Kong authorities are working on creating an alternative to European securities depositories Euroclear and Clearstream to reduce dependence on Western financial infrastructure, the Financial Times reports.”
@Sorenthek
@TFL1728
@LukeGromen
@Kathleen_Tyson_
Text above via Corrine
Source: Financial Times
Thanks
@New1Fabio
&
@hk_nik
for the heads up!
https://x.com/KingKong9888/status/1897202565051506760
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Quote:
Posted by
ravenlocke
some of us do not have access to twitter/ x
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Hi Yoda,
Here’s some more info on this subject. Is that what you want to know?
https://x.com/FirstSourceNew/status/1897340585247453525
https://x.com/SprinterObserve/status...65657530109959
https://x.com/zerohedge/status/1897401768276902385
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitic...ound-midflight
US Planes Carrying Arms To Ukraine Were Turned Around Midflight
After President Trump and Vice President JD Vance accused Ukraine's Zelensky of being 'ungrateful' amid last Friday's explosive row in front of media cameras in the Oval Office, the White House on Monday announced the suspension of military aid to Ukraine.
But it was initially unclear precisely when the pause in arms deliveries would take effect, or whether Trump was merely previewing a future suspension. New information revealed in fresh reports sheds more light on the matter, and clearly Trump means business. It was immediate upon the announcement.
"US weapons deliveries to Ukraine came to an abrupt halt on Monday evening after President Donald Trump ordered a pause on all aid to the war-torn country, the Pentagon confirmed on Tuesday," USA Today reports, based on an admin official.
Inbound shipments on military and transport plans literally turned around midflight, per the report:
After the order was given, all U.S. weapons shipments to Ukraine came to a stop, as of 6 p.m. on Monday evening, according to a defense official. Planes carrying supplies en route to Ukraine would have had to turn around, the official said.
"It was unclear, as of Tuesday, whether Ukraine's direct contracts with U.S. weapons manufacturers, procured through the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, would also be impacted," USA Today continues. "As of mid-December, $1.7 billion out of the $21.2 billion fund had not been used."
There was anticipation that Trump might have unveiled a signed minerals deal with Ukraine during Tuesday night's lengthy 90-minute address to Congress, but that didn't happen. Trump only referenced a vague letter from Zelensky saying Ukraine was merely interested in a minerals deal as well as achieving peace.
Meanwhile, some Democrats on Capitol Hill are panicking over how rapid the Washington relationship with Kiev is breaking down.
Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), ranking member of the Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement: "This act of retribution against our ally, who is on the frontlines defending freedom and democracy, is not only shameful—it is dangerous."
"I urge the administration to reverse course and remember that America’s values lie with the free world, not autocrats and murderous dictators," she said. She ignored the reality of the escalatory build-up to WW3 of the last three years under Biden policy.
And anti-Russia hawk Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) lashed out at Trump, writing the following on X:
The White House followed the weapons halt by lately ordering an intelligence-sharing pause as well, which has reportedly involved leaning on the UK to halt the sharing of intel information with Kiev, though it doesn't necessarily impact other European allies.
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
https://thegrayzone.com/2025/03/01/u...ror-law-abuse/
UN demands answers from UK on terror law abuse
As the British state harasses and arrests a growing number of activists and dissident journalists, including the author of this piece, UN rapporteurs delivered a forceful letter of protest to London condemning its abuse of counter-terror legislation.
In December 2024, a quartet of UN rapporteurs focused on “peaceful assembly and of association” and the “right to privacy” delivered a strongly-worded letter to the British government. Expressing grave concerns about the potential “misapplication of counter-terrorism laws” to arrest, detain, interrogate and surveil dissident activists and journalists, including The Grayzone’s Kit Klarenberg, they demanded clarity on a number of serious issues. Given 60 days to respond, London remained suspiciously silent.
As a result, the UN’s correspondence with the British government has now been made public. The rapporteurs were clearly disturbed by reports of Schedule 7 of the 2000 Terrorism Act, and Schedule 3 of the 2019 Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act, which covers “hostile” state threats, “being used to examine and obtain data from journalists and activists Johanna Ross, John Laughland, Kit Klarenberg, Craig Murray and Richard Medhurst in circumstances where they appear to have no credible connection to ‘terrorist’ or ‘hostile’ activity.”
While awaiting a reply that never came, the UN “urged” British authorities to undertake “interim measures” to prevent any recurrence of potential human rights breaches under counter-terror legislation, and “ensure the accountability” of anyone responsible for “alleged violations.” Evidently undeterred by pressure from the UN, Britain has continued to escalate its war on dissidents.
Since the UN issued its letter of protest, British activists and journalists have since been arrested, raided, and prosecuted, including Asa Winstanley, Tony Greenstein, Sarah Wilkinson, Palestine Action cofounder Richard Barnard, and academic David Miller.
The UN letter focused on how “powers under counter-terrorism legislation have been used on multiple occasions to examine, detain, and arrest journalists and activists, particularly at the UK border.” Individuals “who are critical of Western foreign policy in the context of the conflict in the Middle East and the Russia-Ukraine war are especially affected by the reported misuse of these powers,” the rapporteurs wrote.
Ominously, the UN rapporteurs suggested this could amount to “over-use [or] misuse” of British counter-terrorism legislation “to target legitimate freedom of expression and opinion, including public interest media reporting, and related freedoms of peaceful assembly and association, and political dissent or activism.”
“Vague and broad” laws mean mass-persecution
The UN rapporteurs were especially scathing in their critique of the powers used to harass and potentially incarcerate targets. They charged that Schedule 7 of the 2000 Terrorism Act “may be unjustifiably used against journalists and activists who are critical of Western foreign policy.” In each case they investigated, detentions under this legislation were “premeditated [and] examination, confiscation of devices, and DNA prints were conducted despite the apparent absence of a credible ‘terrorist’ connection” with the individual in question.
Such promiscuous application of ostensible counter-terrorism laws creates the unavoidable “risk of intimidating, deterring, and disrupting the ability of journalists to report on topics of public importance without self-censorship” in Britain. This “serious chilling effect,” the rapporteurs cautioned, could extend well beyond media, and “unjustifiably interfere with the rights to freedom of expression and opinion and participation in public life” across “civil society and legitimate political and public discourse.”
The UN took repeated aim “at the vagueness and overbreadth” of the 2000 Terrorism Act’s criminalisation of “expressing an opinion or belief…supportive of a proscribed organisation.” The legislation’s terms provide no definition whatsoever of the term “support”, an “ambiguous” deficiency that “may unjustifiably criminalize” legitimate opinions “not rationally, proximately or causally related to actual terrorist violence or harms.” They noted this prohibition “goes well beyond the accepted restrictions on freedom of expression under international law concerning the prohibition of incitement to violence or hate speech.”
Indeed, “speech that is neither necessary nor proportionate to criminalize, including legitimate debates about the de-proscription of an organization and disagreement with a government’s decision to proscribe” could be categorized as “supporting” a terrorist group under the 2000 Terrorism Act’s sweeping terms. This is especially problematic given certain factions proscribed by Britain, such as Hamas or Hezbollah, may be “de facto authorities performing a diversity of civilian functions, including governance, humanitarian and medical activities, and provision of social services, public utilities and education”:
“Expressing support for any of these ordinary civilian activities by the organization could constitute expressing support for it, no matter how remote such expression is from support for any violent terrorist acts by the group.”
Working for “hostile” governments without knowing
Similar alarm was sounded about the wording of Schedule 3 of the 2019 Counter-Terrorism and Border Act, under which The Grayzone’s Kit Klarenberg was detained upon returning to his home city of London in May 2023. It stipulates that anyone entering British territory suspected of “hostile activity” on behalf of a foreign power can be held against their will and interrogated for up to six hours, while the contents of their digital devices are seized and stored. Non-compliance automatically results in arrest.
See the notice of detention issued by British state security to journalist Kit Klarenberg under Schedule 3 of the UK’s Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act of 2019 here.
Ever more disturbingly, Schedule 3 is suspicionless. Under the legislation’s terms, “it is immaterial whether a person is aware that activity in which they are or have been engaged is hostile activity, or whether a state for or on behalf of which, or in the interests of which, a hostile act is carried out has instigated, sanctioned, or is otherwise aware of, the carrying out of the act.” In other words, no conspirator in a suspected conspiracy has to have consented to potentially illegal activity.
“Hostile acts” are defined as any behavior deemed threatening to London’s “national security” or “economic well-being.” Again, the rapporteurs condemned this language as “vague and over-broad.” They concluded the phrasing granted British authorities “extraordinary discretion” to engage in “unnecessary, disproportionate or otherwise arbitrary interferences in the rights to liberty and privacy” of individuals detained under these powers. Moreover, as the Act’s targets are not formally under formal criminal investigation or arrest, or suspected of having committed any offense, they have no right to remain silent.
The UN branded this distinction as “artificial… given the punitive sanctions for non-compliance,” branding it as “inconsistent with the accepted meaning of ‘arrest’ or ‘detention’” under Article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The “extreme breadth” of Schedule 3 also “enables unnecessary, disproportionate, arbitrary or discriminatory interference with an individual’s rights, including freedom from arbitrary detention, freedom of movement…and the rights to leave and enter one’s own country.” Article 17 of the ICCPR also states:
“No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with [their] privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on [their] honour and reputation.”
This is explicitly contrary to Klarenberg’s May 2023 experience at Luton airport. There, as the rapporteurs documented, he was “fingerprinted, subjected to oral DNA swabs, and photographed by the examining officer,” while asked excessively invasive questions about his financial affairs, personal and professional relationships, and living situation in his adopted home country of Serbia. His belongings were extensively “searched and he was compelled to provide the passwords to his digital devices, which included a smartphone, tablet, and two cameras.”
Not only was all data on these devices copied, but “the memory cards and SIM cards of the electronic devices were copied outside the interrogation room” and “retained by the police.” As of the letter’s dispatch, one of Klarenberg’s memory cards had “been retained for a period exceeding a year and five months” by British authorities, suggesting he “remains under criminal investigation” for uncertain offenses he did not knowingly or willingly commit.
The rapporteurs noted Klarenberg was among several journalists detained by British border officials whose “electronic devices [were] confiscated for a significant period of time and have not been updated on the use, retention or destruction of their data, or advised in relation to their personal data protection rights.” In many cases, these seized items have never been returned, without satisfactory explanation or seeming legal justification.
New British laws further criminalize dissent
In closing, the UN rapporteurs “encouraged” London to repeal legislation under which dissidents have been persecuted, or “amend it to protect freedom of expression, and…develop prosecutorial guidelines for its appropriate use to avoid the unnecessary or disproportionate incrimination of political dissent.” They further implored London to “indicate how the application of counter-terrorism laws” against activists and journalists “is consistent with international human rights law, and an appropriate application of the law,” while providing “an update on the retention of data taken from the journalists.”
They went on to “urge” the British government to “consider the growing number of instances” where laws purportedly intended to deal with violent terrorist threats “may have been inappropriately directed towards journalists and activists, and to consider addressing this through amendments to the legislation, guidance for relevant officials, and training of border security officers.” Britain’s failure to respond to the UN’s letter, and ever-ratcheting attacks on domestic dissent subsequently, amply indicate these entreaties have fallen on determinedly deaf ears.
In December 2023, Britain rammed through a new round of draconian legislation reinforcing and further codifying the “vague and over-broad” terms of the laws condemned by the UN, under the auspices of the National Security Act. Its terms introduce a number of completely new criminal offenses with severe penalties, and wide-ranging consequences for freedom of speech. Explicitly enacted to neutralize investigative journalism and prevent the emergence of a new WikiLeaks, the Act is so expansive, individuals will almost inevitably break the law without wanting to, intending to, or even knowing they have.
British journalist Johnny Miller seeks asylum in Russia following campaign of harassment
At almost exactly the same time when UN rapporteurs complained to the British government about its abuse of “counter-terror” legislation to persecute dissidents, independent journalist Johnny Miller was granted asylum in Russia. Miller, a British citizen, had reported from the front lines of the Ukraine proxy war for two-and-a-half years. During this period, supporters of the government of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky subjected him a campaign of intensive harassment, hacking his digital devices and Telegram account, bombarding him and his family with anonymous death threats, and publicly stalking him.
Miller told The Grayzone he’s not sure who or what was ultimately behind the campaign of harassment, but strongly suspects British and/or Ukrainian intelligence played a role. He says it was evident from the start of 2024 his movements in Moscow were being closely tracked while he travelled around the city, and seemingly in advance. At repeated meetings with friends and sources in bars, cafes and restaurants in the Russian capital, individuals would be waiting there for him, staring at him menacingly:
“It might sound crazy, but I think that’s the point. The purpose was to drive me insane, and make me look insane if I ever spoke up about this publicly. But these intimidating encounters from afar happened too many times to be a coincidence, and were witnessed by those I met with. One of them was George Dusoe, a US diplomat who quit out of protest over Gaza, after growing disillusionment with US government policy, and then moved to Russia.”
Miller met with Dusoe for a coffee a day before a formal interview. Afterwards, as they headed for the central Moscow metro, Dusoe quietly informed him they were being followed by multiple people. “He’d not only experienced that personally while posted abroad, but was specially trained in how to spot and evade it,” Miller noted. While the pair eventually eluded their stalkers, losing them in the metro, the experience shook Miller.
To this day, he can’t help but wonder, “what if I was alone, and this happened at night?,” citing the example of Adrian Bocquet. A French military veteran, he travelled to Ukraine in April 2022, witnessed Kiev’s forces commit countless grave war crimes, publicly testified to these atrocities while disputing Western claims of Russian atrocities in Bucha after returning home, then was stabbed in Turkey by Ukrainian nationalists. Miller is understandably relieved to finally be granted a degree of legal protection, personally and professionally:
“Their aim was to make me so scared for my life I stopped my work, and they almost succeeded. The psychological impact was massive, it was a form of warfare, and it stressed me like nothing I’ve ever experienced before,” he commented. “It’s a sick irony that one of the main reasons I sought asylum in Russia is [in order] to apply for a new passport, I would’ve had to give the British embassy in Moscow my address. No way!”
While detained in Luton airport in May 2023, The Grayzone’s Kit Klarenberg was not only forced under threat of arrest and prosecution to provide British counter-terror police his apartment address in Belgrade, but its location within the building, how much he paid for rent, and whether energy bills were included in that price. To what malign ends this information was put isn’t clear. From Miller’s point of view, British intelligence is determined to harass dissidents wherever they are, inside the country or thousands of miles away.
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
- The REAL REASON Zelensky Is Prolonging The War Will Surprise You!:
In 2019 historian and Russia expert Stephen F. Cohen sat down with journalist Aaron Maté to discuss Ukraine’s newly elected President, Volodymyr Zelensky, and the threats he faced from neo-Nazi militants in his own country who were pressing to escalate the civil war in the east of Ukraine despite Zelensky running on a peace platform.
Zelensky, of course, caved to the pressure from these ultranationalist elements, as well as NATO, both of whom wanted Ukraine to go to war with Russia, and now we face the end game which could mean the end for Zelensky’s presidency, and worse.
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Kremlin Reacts To Rubio Calling The Ukraine Conflict A Proxy War
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitic...lict-proxy-war
This included the agency having secretly trained and equipped Ukrainian intelligence officers spanning back to just after the 2014 Maidan coup events, as well constructing a network of 12 secret bases along the Russian border—work which began over eight years ago.
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
- Katie Hopkins: Here’s what happens next with UKRAINE. Zelensky has reached his expiry date
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1897587958179397753
https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1897590804069126260
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
¤=[Post Update]=¤
https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1897660080809525713
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1897543075448095198
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
¤=[Post Update]=¤
https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1897603700748582950
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Text:
A group of European military experts have developed a plan called Sky Shield, which would see 120 European fighter jets defending Ukrainian cities and facilities. And it "would not necessarily provoke a wider conflict with Moscow," The Guardian claims.
It would definitely provoke a wider conflict with Moscow. Because Russia would not only shoot down these European fighter jets, it would also strike their airfields. Nuclear war would then be minutes away.
https://t.me/vicktop55/31739
https://x.com/vick55top/status/1897693259087958120
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Text:
‘US seeks Zelensky replacement to strike deal with Russia to end Ukraine war’ – Politico
‘Four senior members of Donald Trump’s inner circle held secret talks with Tymoshenko and Poroshenko. Discussions focused on whether Ukraine could hold quick presidential elections after a temporary ceasefire is agreed but before full peace talks begin in earnest’
https://x.com/Zlatti_71/status/1897606083671154922
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Text:
The Kremlin views Macron's address to the nation yesterday as confrontational, creating the impression that France is seeking to prolong the war.
This was stated by Presidential Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov during a briefing. He also pointed out a number of inaccuracies in Macron's statements, including regarding the Ukrainian settlement.
Other statements by Peskov:
🔘 Moscow has repeatedly stated that the situation in Ukraine is a proxy war, agreeing with the words of U.S. Secretary of State Rubio.
🔘 Russia agrees that the time to stop the Ukrainian conflict has come.
🔘 The U.S. is currently not a friendly country for Russia, and there is an attempt to revive relations.
🔘 Russia's reaction to the possible deployment of a French contingent on Ukrainian territory is obvious to everyone.
🔘 No signals for contact with Moscow have been received from Paris.
Additionally, the Kremlin pointed out several inaccuracies in Macron's address to the nation:
🔘 Nothing was said about how NATO's military infrastructure has been approaching Russia's borders.
🔘 Russia's legitimate concerns in this regard were not mentioned.
🔘 The French President did not mention that Hollande previously admitted that the Minsk agreements were never intended to be implemented.
🔘 Nothing was said about how the French Foreign Minister in 2014 signed a document guaranteeing Yanukovych's security, only for the Europeans to later deceive him.
- ukraine_watch
https://x.com/Zlatti_71/status/1897599416942436530
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Text:
Zaluzhnyi Warns: “World War III Has Begun” as Global Order Crumbles
Valeriy Zaluzhnyi, Ukraine's Ambassador to the UK and former Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, has issued a stark warning about the state of global security. In a recent address, he criticized the United States for actions that he believes are destabilizing the world order and cautioned that NATO itself faces the risk of disintegration amidst the ongoing conflict with Russia. (The Times)
Highlighting the wider implications of the war, Zaluzhnyi pointed to the involvement of Russian allies in Ukraine, emphasizing that the situation is no longer a regional struggle but a full-scale international crisis. He went so far as to declare that “World War III has begun,” underscoring the escalating tensions and the dangerous trajectory of global geopolitics. (New York Post)
https://x.com/Zlatti_71/status/1897598458577748009
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Text:
‼️🇷🇺🇩🇪 Moscow strongly urges Berlin to consider the risks of supporting anti-Russian terrorist organizations, such as the "Russian Volunteer Corps," which is banned in #Russia, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova stated.
‼️By backing such groups, #Germany is playing with fire, she warned.
https://x.com/MaimunkaNews/status/1897643048848195708
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Text:
‼️🇺🇸🇺🇦 Reuters: #Trump Administration Plans to Revoke Temporary Status for 240,000 Ukrainians.
Reuters reports that the U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is preparing to revoke temporary legal status for approximately 240,000 Ukrainians who fled the conflict with #Russia. A senior Trump official and three sources familiar with the matter confirmed the plan, which could put those affected at risk of deportation. #Ukraina
https://x.com/MaimunkaNews/status/1897641896974966917
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Text:
‼️🇷🇺 Report by the #Russian Defence Ministry on repelling AFU attempt to invade Russian territory in Kursk region (6 March 2025).
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the operation to neutralise AFU formations on the territory of Kursk region.
▫️In the course of offensive actions, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on formations of one heavy mechanised brigade, five mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, one assault brigade, two air assault brigades, two territorial defence brigades, and two assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Goncharovka, Gornal, Zaoleshenka, Kazachya Lonknya, Kurilovka, Pervy Knyazhy, Lebedevka, Malaya Loknya, Makhnovka, Rubanshchina, Staraya Sorochina, and Sudzha. Three enemy counter-attacks were repelled.
▫️Operational-Tactical and Army aviation and artillery inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the enemy near Bondarevka, Viktorovka, Guyevo, Dmitryukov, Zazulevka, Zamostye, Kolmakov, Kositsa, Vtoroy Knyazhy, Loknya, Melovoy, Mirny, Cherkasskoye Porechnoye, Yuzhny as well as Basovka, Belovody, Vodolagi, Zhuravka, Zapselye, Miropolye, Novenkoye, and Yunakovka (Sumy region).
▫️Over the course of the day, the AFU losses were more than 170 troops, one tank, one infantry fighting vehicle, one armoured personnel carrier, two armoured fighting vehicles, eight motor vehicles, five field artillery guns, one mortar, one counterobstacle vehicle, and four UAV command posts.
▫️ Since the beginning of hostilities in Kursk direction, the AFU losses amounted to more than 65,230 troops, 385 tanks, 296 infantry fighting vehicles, 256 armoured personnel carriers, 2,133 armoured fighting vehicles, 2,315 motor vehicles, 515 artillery guns, 52 MLRS launchers, including 13 of HIMARS and seven of MLRS made by the USA, 25 anti-aircraft missile launchers, one self-propelled anti-aircraft system, ten transport-loading vehicles, 118 EW stations, 15 counter-battery warfare radars, nine air defence radars, 53 units of engineering and other materiel, including 21 counterobstacle vehicles, one UR-77 mine clearing vehicle, five bridge launchers, one engineering reconnaissance vehicle as well as 14 armoured recovery vehicles, and one command post vehicle.
The operation to neutralise the AFU units is in progress.
https://x.com/MaimunkaNews/status/1897619695550750996
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
- They Don't Want You To Know... The Deep State’s Deadly Delusion | Worldwide Impending Disaster:
Neil Oliver delivers a scathing critique of Western leaders’ push for continued involvement in the Ukraine conflict. He exposes the disconnect between political rhetoric and reality, questioning the motives behind calls for military action. Oliver challenges the erosion of national identity, the economic implications of war, and the hypocrisy of asking youth to defend a country they’ve been taught to be ashamed of. Featuring insights from diplomats and scholars, this video reveals the dangerous delusions driving current geopolitical strategies.
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Ravenlocke: you know how much we appreciate what you're doing here, and do carry on :flower: However, RT and Sputnik are blocked all across the UK, and Europe by way of 'legal' instruments: essentially we can't access this content. If you are able to resource this content via other sources, as you do do, then that would be greatly appreciated.
I've thanked all these RT and Sputnik posts as a gesture of further appreciation for the effort you've made, but have never been able to see what they contain. This will affect members based in Europe, UK, and it seems Canada as well :flower:
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
I haven't really had a problem accessing RT or Sputnik from Canada. Occasionally there's been some problems if using a 'google' browser in the past. But now it seems fine.