Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence
Quote:
Posted by
7alon
Quote:
Posted by
Bill Ryan
Quote:
Posted by
Ewan
Quote:
Posted by
Bill Ryan
Sorry, I don't understand. I'm looking at spelling mistakes*, or is this an example of how one word can replace another and forty years from now people will be saying I remember it was Looney Tunes?
A search on same website for "looney tunes" returns 11 results.
*assumes said authors never saw a Looney Tunes cartoon in their life and are just guessing based on a more modern parlance of 'toons
I'm missing something here aren't I?
Yes. It used to be
Looney Toons. (As in car
toons.) Now, it's changed.
Wait.. it is Looney Tunes now?
This is gonna sound a little weird btw, but I noticed a moderator here called 'Rachel'. Before I start to forget, in case I do; until today I there was no Rachel for me. She isn't the only one either. Marianne was never there either for me.
Just wanted to say that because I've never experienced something like this just appear to me before (no offense to the people I named, just really shocked). I've had visions of other timelines recently, and somehow I knew what they were and started feeling really sad. I was going to post about it sooner, but it just seemed odd to me and I didn't feel ready to share it, until the above happened today.
Mod comment from Bill: Rachel used to be Innocent Warrior... see her Avatar, which still shows her old name, to avoid confusion (if possible!). We changed it when she rejoined the mods team a short while ago. It's a core part of the Avalon tradition that all mods have 'real' names, to present a human face to the community at all times.
Oh man, this can get really confusing LOL.:facepalm:
By any chance is this the case with Marianne too? I regularly look at the list of moderators and they were never there before. I remember things like a war that never happened. I think it was between Russia and the US. I definitely remember Putin being president, but I don't remember who the US president was. Strangely I don't believe it was either Trump OR Hillary. It was a man with lighter hair, old.. I don't know if it was Bernie Sanders. I'm not trying to play games here, I would never do that, just sharing my experiences.From Bill: No, Marianne's been a mod forever, and her name has never changed.
Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence
Quote:
Posted by
Flash
Quote:
Posted by
Flash
I remember looney toons as well, the cartoon title was in English (not translated), but the cartoon itself was translated into French and I did listen to it when little.
However, curiously, I still fail to find any Mandela Effect in French itself and I find it very odd. Why wouldn't the Mandela effect be in every language?
And it is as often found in pictures (like the warlike robot sometimes with a silver leg and sometimes with a gold leg)?
Quote:
Posted by
Rachel
Very cool because I vividly remember Looney Toons, I can still see the image of it in my mind and Looney Tunes looks wrong. The next thought you typically have is, well maybe they changed it, but evidently not.
I've noticed two ways the ME is experienced that's convincing. One being the old version is a vivid memory and the change can't be dismissed. The other being I notice it first, before it's on the internet as a ME, and I think to myself something like, "how odd, I'm sure it was such and such, they must have changed it" and then you see it online and all the others who remember it exactly the same as you did. Some you can dismiss by thinking, well maybe we all sang the lyrics wrong, that happens a lot, but there are all sorts of different changes, so after a few that reasoning doesn't stick so well. Looney Toons is a good one, because we saw it so many times, so I imagine it's quite vivid for a lot of people.
I must add something else to this post of mine above.
This morning , i decided to search for loony toones but in the French google search, and felt on a site for the most likes cartoons. I punch in 50's and 60's and got loony toones in it. I taught "wow, just got it, with the original wording, I will post it on avalon, since the French side has not Mandela effect". I came, wrote the post, went back to get the 50's and 60's add for Looney toones and it had become Looney tunes. I truly taught I had crossed eyes, or something, in fact I thought it was the unconscious infuence of this thread that made me see it as Looney Toons at first. I tought "am I going nuts?". I did not dare writing up what I had seen at first, because I really thought I had been influenced and that the actual French add was for Looney Tunes all along, but wishing to see Toons, i had seen it, instead of the real stuff.
But thinking it over, maybe we are actually creating reality as we go along, changing stuff, therefore the Mandela effect, which is now becoming transparent and fast how creative/reality creating we are.
To tell the truth, I am confused about this since this morning.
No this kind of thing happens to me too, you're not going nuts :P.
It is hard to describe, it is like my mind slips between two realities almost. Then you just think you were imagining it. Just minutes ago I received another shock because in a thread Omnisense made, they were talking about Stanley Kubrick's death after Eyes Wide Shut. I was sitting there thinking.. Umm no Stanley Kubrick died in 2010 at 82. I went to search to prove them wrong.. and yeah apparently I'm wrong :P
Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence
What about this SHAZAM movie footage. I never saw this movie, but one friend told me saw it when he was kid. I showed him this clip. He says he remembers little bit.
If this Video is of real SHAZAM movie which was never been made then this clip may have been brought by a time traveler. And if is a fake footage made in studio, then its just the culdesac for those who are new to this Madela Effect topic thinking that its just a Bogus theory.
Here is the original Footage. This footage is recently uploaded on Internet, most probably 1st April
Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence
Quote:
Posted by
kanishk
Here is the original Footage. This footage is recently uploaded on Internet, most probably 1st April
Good find, kanishk. :happythumbsup: Two for the price of one… in the video you provided, there’s a commercial for Fruit Loops @ 36 sec.
What does Sinbad say about Shazam?
Sinbad recently took to Twitter to comment on playing a genie in a movie called Shazam (also commonly spelled Shazaam) that people say they remember but apparently can’t find anymore.
The Shazam movie “Mandela Effect” has taken the internet community by storm. Fans say they vividly remember watching a Sinbad genie movie dating back to the early 90s but finding tangible proof the Shazam movie ever existed is impossible. People have now resorted to calling out Sinbad on social media for an explanation of what happened to the Shazam movie. So, starting late last month, Sinbad decided to address the whole Shazam movie phenomenon in a series of tweets and finally put to rest whether he really did play a genie in a movie.
*****
Video footage on Imdb.com registers Shazam, but when he clicks on it the link it goes to somewhere else. @ 1:22. It's too bad he didn't refresh the page to see if the Shazam link still comes up.
NEW 2017 Mandela Effect? Shazam (1994) Movie with Sinbad Proof?!? REAL OR HOAX??
Published on Feb 20, 2017
This is my first video, I made this channel for this, and I will make more!
I was sent this video by a friend, and I wanted to share this with people out there. I don't know where he recieved this video, but please, Check this out!! IS THIS REAL OR A HOAX? Please Subscribe below!! Thanks~!
Comment, like and share!!
*****
Side note: It doesn’t show when I looked it up.
Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence
I have always thought that there were several SONGS that had changed from what I remember them as when I was younger. I was always puzzled by this but never could put my finger on it until all this Mandela Effect stuff started surfacing.
Just for yucks it was 'Frankenstein' by Edgar Winter and 'Man on the Silver Mountain' by Rainbow. From a kid I always remember the weird part in Frankenstein a little different. And the Rainbow song had a different voice inflection in the chorus. Who knows!
Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence
Quote:
Posted by
7alon
Quote:
Posted by
Flash
Quote:
Posted by
Flash
I remember looney toons as well, the cartoon title was in English (not translated), but the cartoon itself was translated into French and I did listen to it when little.
However, curiously, I still fail to find any Mandela Effect in French itself and I find it very odd. Why wouldn't the Mandela effect be in every language?
And it is as often found in pictures (like the warlike robot sometimes with a silver leg and sometimes with a gold leg)?
Quote:
Posted by
Rachel
Very cool because I vividly remember Looney Toons, I can still see the image of it in my mind and Looney Tunes looks wrong. The next thought you typically have is, well maybe they changed it, but evidently not.
I've noticed two ways the ME is experienced that's convincing. One being the old version is a vivid memory and the change can't be dismissed. The other being I notice it first, before it's on the internet as a ME, and I think to myself something like, "how odd, I'm sure it was such and such, they must have changed it" and then you see it online and all the others who remember it exactly the same as you did. Some you can dismiss by thinking, well maybe we all sang the lyrics wrong, that happens a lot, but there are all sorts of different changes, so after a few that reasoning doesn't stick so well. Looney Toons is a good one, because we saw it so many times, so I imagine it's quite vivid for a lot of people.
I must add something else to this post of mine above.
This morning , i decided to search for loony toones but in the French google search, and felt on a site for the most likes cartoons. I punch in 50's and 60's and got loony toones in it. I taught "wow, just got it, with the original wording, I will post it on avalon, since the French side has not Mandela effect". I came, wrote the post, went back to get the 50's and 60's add for Looney toones and it had become Looney tunes. I truly taught I had crossed eyes, or something, in fact I thought it was the unconscious infuence of this thread that made me see it as Looney Toons at first. I tought "am I going nuts?". I did not dare writing up what I had seen at first, because I really thought I had been influenced and that the actual French add was for Looney Tunes all along, but wishing to see Toons, i had seen it, instead of the real stuff.
But thinking it over, maybe we are actually creating reality as we go along, changing stuff, therefore the Mandela effect, which is now becoming transparent and fast how creative/reality creating we are.
To tell the truth, I am confused about this since this morning.
No this kind of thing happens to me too, you're not going nuts :P.
It is hard to describe, it is like my mind slips between two realities almost. Then you just think you were imagining it. Just minutes ago I received another shock because in a thread Omnisense made, they were talking about Stanley Kubrick's death after Eyes Wide Shut. I was sitting there thinking.. Umm no Stanley Kubrick died in 2010 at 82. I went to search to prove them wrong.. and yeah apparently I'm wrong :P
When looking at the Mandela effect, we need to eliminate purely linguistic effects whereby alternative realities are created, whether deliberately (poetically) or accidentally. For example, the phrase ‘to toe the line’ is based on the image of runners lining up at the start of the race, and not reducing the distance by stepping onto the course. Hence the dictionary meaning, ‘to conform rigorously to a rule or standard’. However, someone who has only ever heard the phrase and doesn’t know the origin of the expression may start writing ‘tow the line’. The image now becomes one of sailors pulling a hawser or people in a tug of war. Even though the correct meaning may persist, this may change over time: as more people write ‘tow the line’, it may come to mean something very different, I’m not quite sure what. Whether or not it does is irrelevant: what has been created is a forking path in the language, a tiny event to be sure, but whichever way the cookie crumbles it has nothing to do with the Mandela effect.
This may be what is happening with Loony Tunes/Toons.
Loony Tunes started in 1930, to be joined by Merrie Melodies in 1931. This establishes the spelling Tunes as original since clearly ‘Merrie Melodies’ is a rewrite of ‘Loony Tunes’ (with an aliteration Me- Me- replacing the rhyme), whereas ‘Loony Toons’ would be only a transcription of the US pronunciation misspelt, whether deliberately or otherwise, in the context of cartoons; I would say it was deliberate, not only on the basis that it reduplicates the sequence -oon-: Loony Toons, but also because it is poetically effective, where the above example of toe/tow is simply a possibly irritating mistake. What makes a rhyme sublime is that it brings together an unlikely pair and makes them coalesce into a single concept: more like a chemical compound than a chemical mixture. The interesting thing in this case is that this single concept of the (car)toon tune was already in place in 1929:
Quote:
In the film, a cartoonist (portrayed in live action by Rudolph Ising) draws Bosko, who comes to life. Bosko speaks, sings, dances and plays the piano before the cartoonist sucks him into his ink pen and pours him back into the inkwell.
It should be remembered that sound movies were a brand new phenomenon at the time. The first feature film originally presented as a talkie, The Jazz Singer, was released in October 1927. Hence the marriage of picture and sound was much newer then than taking selfies with a smartphone is today. This is cutting-edge film-making, so the ‘toon-tune thing is more than just a fun pun.
Another aspect of this is evident in the ending: ‘the cartoonist sucks him into his ink pen and pours him back into the inkwell’. This is clearly based on the specifics of film, whereby a film can be played backwards. Since this is also applicable to a piece of music, I expect they played the toon backwards too. I occasionally catch at BBC Radio 3 programme when they play a piece of classical music backwards and the listener tries to identify it (a musical version of reverse speech): it is amazing how little difference it sometimes makes!
This whole story leads us in at least two directions. One is the Pinocchio effect of artificial life, which I discuss here in another context. The other is the retrograde effect of linear time, which I discuss here (and in the post before it) in yet another context.
Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence
I'm in agreement with that. The more I am exposed to examples of the Mandela Effect, the less convinced I am. 'Merrie Melodies' is an excellent point, I'd totally forgotten about that spin-off. Merrie - Loony / Melodies - Tunes. So of course Melodies only makes contextual sense when married to its forerunner Tunes, so it could never have been Toons. Consider also the musical fanfare that starts playing when those titles come up. That I presume IS the 'looney tune'.
I think Loony Toons has become another mythical buzzphrase, one that is easy for the mind to fasten onto if it is only casually familiar with the material, rather than being a die hard fan. A casual Star Trek fan will believe in "Beam me up Scotty", when a die hard will chuckle to himself, knowing full well for years and years that that phrase was never ever said.
Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence
Not sure exactly why but I get a Mandala effect with Marty and Biff:
Back to the Future - Biff's World (1989)
Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence
Have I got news for you Time 15:45
Discusses the Mandela effect.
Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence
Dr. Tarrin Lupo, a chiropractor compares physiological changes in the human anatomy between the new and old reality. Dr. Lupo finished his training in 2000 and it matches current reality. He explains that something shifted in the 1990’s.
I’ve added quick links to the specific topics. Note: Dani Arnold McKenny uses strong language.
”Tarrin and I took an in depth look at the physiological changes to our human anatomy, from the "new" skeletal structure to size and placement of various organs in the human body, and discussed what the physical ramifications to these changes could be. From body pain that has developed without any previous injury or accident, to visual and auditory changes.”
4:50 - Universal donor blood type
7:53 - Kidneys
11:36 - other health professionals concur on the old reality.
16:22 - floating ribs, ribcage
24:20 - In the new reality the body is subpar and skull @ 25:45
39:54 - pelvis, coccyx, sacrum
53:50 - kidneys
1:20:13 - stomach, liver & subpar intestine
Published on May 17, 2017
Sorry for the mix up with the previous video upload!!
On Transpicuous Views last night, I was joined by Dr. Tarrin Lupo in a continuation of our epic discussion that started the previous evening when I was invited onto his show "Tarrin it up", (link below).
To continue reading and for further links, please go to rts.earth HERE:
http://www.rts.earth/2017/05/transpi...r-tarrin-lupo/
