Quote:
	
		
		
			
				Posted by 
Finefeather
				
			 
			Hi Amzer...
Did some one not prove the lie detector unreliable as a general rule? and if so...and because of the way it works...some detectable change or impulse from the person... could that not also apply to this e-meter?
[...]
Ray
			
		
	 
  
	Quote:
	
		
		
			
				Posted by 
Nanoo Nanoo
				
			 
			[...]
 
oooh hang on ... 
you are refering to a general wheatstone bridge arent you ?   You didnt search for the actual diagram of an actual E Meter did you ?  Seeing that im apparently sitting for an exam i did some research and found THE actual diagram of the unit in question.. .not some other un related one, Amzer ... 
[...]
N
			
		
	 
  All right, answering to both of you.
A "lie detector," like an e-meter, addresses the changes occurring within an individual in the here and now in reaction/response to questions.
Trouble is, and for most people, the here and now contains everything from the past as well as the "automatic" future on top of the "now" (see Steve Richards). Hence a lie detector is unreliable since "reads/registers" can come from past lives, current life, automatic current future and future lives.
People operating lie detectors neglect past and future thinking that any read can only be due to current life. Also, they do not differentiate between a past reality gone unconscious and a virtual, fictitious reality consciously imagined/"mocked up"/thought about by an individual in his/her thoughts.
E-meter operators, up until jiminii, considered current life and past lives but neglected "futures" except as "intentions" in the present. However, e-meter operators do differentiate, between unconscious storage and conscious imagining of such, in determining whether a "read/register" is instant or not.
Now, the e-meter kept being modified and became a "sophisticated" Wheatstone Bridge because there are a number of ways a "read/register" can occur.
The two main ones being and addition or reduction of mass (ridge
*) which modifies the overall resistance of the body (Rx) holding the "meter's" electrodes and/or an addition (feeding) or removal (sucking) of electrical energy in the Rx circuit by the "thetan" or by induction due to an electromagnetic "mass" moving around within the individual's field or, also, by electromagnetic signals from TV, radio, cell towers, cell phones, truck and cars passing by, etc... 
The "sophistication" in the e-meter is mainly due to the latter with additions of filters to eliminate environmental "parasites"/interferences. These are the "frequency filters" added to the basic Wheatstone Bridge of the e-meter circuit.
The e-meter operator can only see what happens on the meter unless also "psychic" or a very keen observer able to notice subtle changes in the individual holding the meter's electrodes.
LRH being both psychic and gifted with a very keen sense of observation, realized that most "auditors" weren't or wouldn't be either and threw the idea -- for anyone to grab on -- of being able to measure what was happening to "ridges"
* in an individual's field when these "ridges" blew or vanished (as-ised).
Mathieson grab the ball and ran with it and LRH being able to "see" what was happening in people's field as well as corroborate the subtle energy behaviour with physical observation of the "Rx" body holding the "cans"/electrodes was able to modify, suggest improvements and calibrate the e-meter down to what was only necessary to measure or "read" on its dial.
So, being "In Session" and therefore being "interested in one's own 'case' and willing to talk to the auditor" rather than playing with one's energy field to "see" what it would do on the meter is the optimum condition for the use of an e-meter as a tool to help locate where a "ridge"
* is causing troubles in one's life.
* RIDGE, 
1. it's a standing apparent motionlessness of some kind or other, an
apparent solidity, an apparent no-outflow—no-inflow, that's a ridge. Flows
have direction. Ridges have location. (5904C08) 
2. a ridge is caused by two energy flows coinciding and causing an enturbulence of energy, which, on examination, is found to take on a characteristic which in energy flows is very like matter, having its particles in chaotic mixture. (Scn 8-80, p. 43) 
3. a ridge is formed from two [opposite] flows and these two flows hitting will pile things up. (PDC 18) 
4. a ridge is essentially suspended energy in space. it comes about by flows, dispersals or ridges impinging against one another with a sufficient solidity to cause an enduring state of energy. (Scn 8-8008, p. 18) 
5 . a solid body of energy caused by various flows and dispersals which has a duration longer than the duration of flow. Any piece of matter could be considered to be a ridge in its last stage. Ridges, however, exist in suspension around a person and are the foundation upon which facsimiles are built. (Scn 8-8008, p. 49) 
6 . facsimiles, or pictures, of motion. (Scn 8-80, p. 45) 
7 . areas of dense waves. (Scn 8-8008, p. 78) 
8 . electronic densities. (Scn Jour 6-G)
Flow 1 (intention) --------------> 
X <------ Flow 2 (counter-intention)
Ridge 
Most of the time, the counter intention to one's intention is long gone but the created ridge is still there. When, once again, one flows out such an intention, that intention "hits" the ridge and its initial "counter intention" is reactivated and confused as being in "present time." Conversely, when a similar "counter intention" is encountered, and although the "intention" is long gone, that "counter intention" also "hits" the ridge and the initial intention "wakes up"....
Accordingly, most people are kept in the "jails" of the past... whence prejudices, antagonisms, conflicts, etc. are kept alive... many a "gut's feeling" are borne out of those "ridges"....