Richard Dolan with Joseph Farrell. I've not listened to this yet, but I'm fully expecting an extremely high quality conversation.
Printable View
Richard Dolan with Joseph Farrell. I've not listened to this yet, but I'm fully expecting an extremely high quality conversation.
...
:happythumbsup:
"Collateralizing Space" ... "This sector of the galaxy is ours!"
Crowbar Space Mining Co
- Private Property
- No Trespassing!
- Keep Out!
Thanks, Bill! I could listen to to those two all day!! :highfive:
Richard Dolan members dot com is the first paywall I've wanted to smash a hole through.Quote:
Posted by Bill Ryan
Joseph Farrell put the Operation Highjump myth to bed in short order. No evidence of anything more than a downed plane and lost crew, and Richard added that the US sent 2 more expeditions ( military ) down there soon after. That looks more like they found something interesting and went back to do more specific examinations of whatever it was.
The whole idea that Antarctica is a special clean place to be environmentally protected, all the way through from WW2 just HAS to be a crock. And anyway, according to Clif High, there has been a nuclear power station down there during some of that time.
RD on F2B!
Quote:
Posted by Star Tsar
JImmy Church show episode 903 part 1
Talking about the alleged UFO crash material they have
It made me laugh at 1:26.....
. Jimmy Church 'they know I'm not gonna throw softball questions at them so they won't let me interview them'
Richard Dolan ''Actually you are a very good journalist''
Yes Jimmy no softball questions are ever thrown at Corey Goode, Emery and David except all of the questions are softballs.
When George Knapp was mentioned I noticed Jimmy raised his eyebrows
Haven't listened to JC for a while. Interesting always with Dolan but no mention of DW CG ES.
Both Dolan and Church are now wrong on their date of modern man they kept saying 200k years but it is now pushed back to 300k years ago.
Modern humans emerged more than 300,000 years ago new study suggests
https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0928142016.htm
On edit: In the second video clip is the absolute best out of the two and he comes down hard on Greer and David but not by name at 17:30 Dolan talks about Giai and the Luciferian Codswallop rumors David started, but not about David by name but there is no doubt who this is about
he says :'' Giai Luciferian? What an absolutely ridiculous joke it's beyond a joke its an embarrassment . I don't know why anybody is not calling this out? Energy beams in the wall? Where is your proof? Ridiculous ! An embarrasment''
Yes, Richard is directly addressing Wilcock in his rant on the Gaia TV stuff ("you've worked there for 6 years and now all of a sudden you figure it's Luciferian??...c'mon!!"). Interested in checking out that Strange Angel tv show that Jimmy referenced about Parsons and Aleister Crowley (downloading it now). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_Angel
Love the AC/DC shirt!!
Dave - Toronto
Richard was also strongly recommending the short story The Death of Ivan Ilyich, by Leo Tolstoy. (Unlike War and Peace, just 39 pages. :) ) Richard was referencing it as an exquisitely written and poignantly memorable story of a man who'd reached the end of his life only to realize that he'd done it all wrong.Quote:
Posted by Spellbound
- Leo Tolstoy - The Death of Ivan Ilyich, and Other Stories 1
http://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Leo%...tories%201.pdf
===
[ Mod-edit: "The Death of Ivan Ilyich" is on pages 43 to 81 of this 386 page collection of 11 short stories written by Tolstoy. -- Paul. ]
Quote:
Posted by ichingcarpenter
The Jimmy Church show is definitely not the correct forum to ask Richard Dolan this, but someone should take him into a quiet corner and ask him if he's ever done any research into who Jirka is.
His laughing scorn is not one of his better moments, inmo.
Richard Dolan (live) on The Faker Phenomenon in Ufology
Seems someone has ascended, changed their DNA and can now change the color of their skin to the color blue
but only on skype
I wonder who it is?? Another amazing technology revealed by the Sphere Being Alliance? Who could it be??? He doesn't say
I feel the same way. But I'm not going to do it.Quote:
Posted by norman
It's a profound strategic mistake. (And this is Tracey's initiative, btw. Richard was never this commercially oriented a short while ago.)
What he's saying is essentially this:I have some important information to offer the ufology community, which I've dedicated my life to. But I'm not going to let you have it unless you first give me some money.
I've noticed in his "Intelligent Disclosure" clips that they only read out the questions (and mention the names) of people who pledged money during the live chat. I really enjoy these videos (especially the Q&A afterwards)....but when I see dollar amounts and currencies (CAD/USD/GBP) posted during a chat beside the video....I raise an eyebrow. Is Richard selling out??
Dave - Toronto
Is he referring to Corey Goode here as the person who said last June in Toronto that he could make his skin turn blue as a result of his DNA and then went on to do it during a video chat?? Interesting that Richard comments on not actually naming names but then goes on to say he will name names in the future but warns that it does tend to open up some battles. 6 months or so ago, I saw Richard and Corey both on the same panel at some sort of conference...and Richard took issue with Corey saying that his own testimony was not hard evidence for which Corey tried to defend himself but then Richard went on to virtually eviscerate him (it was quite intersting to watch them go back and forth). I know Bill (and Richard) have both denounced Corey Goode, for which I applaud. People should name names when calling BS.Quote:
Posted by ichingcarpenter
Dave - Toronto
This money thing seems to be the New Way to do things.....Lionel does it well....to each his own! I prefer to respect someone like our Bill, who IS one of the Greats in this field & hasn't traded on his name for money! :kiss:
I know this is off topic:Quote:
Posted by Bill RyanI feel the same way. But I'm not going to do it.Quote:
Posted by norman
It's a profound strategic mistake. (And this is Tracey's initiative, btw. Richard was never this commercially oriented a short while ago.)
What he's saying is essentially this:I have some important information to offer the ufology community, which I've dedicated my life to. But I'm not going to let you have it unless you first give me some money.
I know in the live chat which she controls she will only mention questions by '' members' I ask some good questions I think at times but she ignored mine and others who were not 'members'. Yes, there is no shame in asking for support for the work one does.'Joe from Carolina' does a good job on how he has set up his channel by using his amazon affiliates for products patron etc and he doesn't ignore people that are not 'members'. One should look at the RV channels whereas a lot of them are just plain 'e-beggers' with no real content. Did you know that one person in the RV channel world that really does a lot for RV living including maintenance, solar installation, innovations etc lives in his van and he makes around $10,000 a month because of the number a subscribers, commercials, patron, amazon affiliates etc. on his channel.
She needs to change her business model but she is getting Richard to produce more and be heard more so that is good, but Tracey is wrong on her approach using exclusivity so much to obtain information.
I know Bill posted the Dolan/Farrell interview a few days ago posted at a different site for which I tried to DL it but didn't have much luck. Richard finally uploaded it to You Tube, which I'm currently DL'ing and converting to mp3 for my USB stick for my suv. When titans like this talk among themselves....I like to listen.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WOMzdJJKi5M
Dave - Toronto
Looking forward to his interview with David Paulides (I think Richard mentioned October).
Dave - Toronto
itchingcarpenter....About your questions. :confused:
You can pose them here on Avalon as we have many members who are very knowledgeable on many subjects! Plus....there is the great Library here for any research you have in mind! :star:
I know this is a knowledgeable site but my questions to Dolan were to help expand the conversation and knowledge for his listenersQuote:
Posted by Foxie Loxie
BTW.... its not the itching carpenter but the Iching carpenter.....LOL
Yes. :)Quote:
Posted by Foxie Loxie
But it's a tricky and more complex issue, actually. And also, in total fairness, not easy to handle.
What may be happening is that the paid-up members seem to get priority access to Richard.
I've written three e-mails to Richard in the last several months, each containing detailed, referenced, and arguably potentially important research information. With most of it, I was sure it'd be of interest. He's fully aware of Avalon's value in research support, as we helped him a great deal when preparing for his MUFON panel last year when he stood firm against Corey Goode, Andy Basiago, et al. (And did a wonderful job of that, too.)
He replied to the most recent one, which I greatly appreciated. But I have no idea if he's even seen the others. The first one, the longest, I sent three times, and I still doubt he knows anything about it.
I've thought of joining richarddolanmembers.com simply to be able to communicate directly with him, but then again, I'm not going to do that: I'm not going to pay so that I can share information that's valuable for him. It's a bit of a problem, and surely not just for myself.
I absolutely understand the issue of being overwhelmed with messages. It happens to me, too, as some Avalon members really understand. But because there seems to be a priority filtering in place based on subscriptions, that's maybe not the very best way to deal with that.
There needs to be someone whose assigned job is to read through everything that's sent to him — surely a LOT of stuff — and then prioritize based on (a) content, and (b) who the sender is, maybe cross-referencing against a list provided by Richard of who he'd always like to hear from.
I'd suggest this to him, also, but then I don't know if he'd receive that. :)