A brief reminder of a couple of so many Big Harma crimes from the past.
Printable View
A brief reminder of a couple of so many Big Harma crimes from the past.
I think it is relevant to repost this 7 minute video of Jesse Ventura and Dr. Rima Laibow discussing the pending pandemic - in 2009 - Dr Laibow flew in to the US to make this video with Jesse and would not stay a minute longer, got straight back on the plane and got the hell out of dodge so to speak.
Source: https://www.brighteon.com/embed/878a5d09-4496-4d5d-ac97-e9943746c8a5
Amnesty for an Apology? COVID Dictators Looking for Way Out
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
February 15, 2023
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...bid=1721821130
"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Draconian COVID measures ruined the lives of millions of lower- and middle-class Americans while lining the pockets of the liberal cabal, and those who spoke the truth were punished rather than lauded for their reason
Now, the tide is starting to shift. Recent polling shows 49% of Americans believe the COVID shots may be responsible for the massive rise in sudden deaths and 28% say they know someone they believe was killed by the shots
In early November 2022, The Atlantic published an article by Brown University economist Emily Oster, who suggested COVID dictators be granted “amnesty” for their mistaken beliefs about COVID-19.
It failed miserably, as just about everyone saw through her ill-conceived arguments
January 30, 2023, medical student Kevin Bass followed in Oster’s footsteps, penning an opinion piece for Newsweek in which he urges the scientific community to “admit we were wrong about COVID and it cost lives”
Communications analysts agree Bass’ essay is another manipulative effort to overcome public distrust in authorities
In The Hill segment above, Batya Ungar-Sargon reviews how draconian COVID measures ruined the lives of millions of lower- and middle-class Americans while lining the pockets of the liberal cabal. Indeed, the cost of the COVID measures were definitely not born equally by all. Moreover, those who spoke the truth were punished rather than lauded for their reason.
Now, the tide is starting to shift. Recent polling shows 49% of Americans believe the COVID shots may be responsible for the massive rise in sudden deaths and 28% say they know someone they believe was killed by the shots.1
With half the country now questioning the shots, the propagandists surely have their work cut out for them. Perhaps some of them are realizing it's now a losing battle and they need an escape plan, a new narrative to salvage what little public trust is left.
Apologies and Calls for Amnesty Are Just More Propaganda
https://media.mercola.com/ImageServe...-apologist.jpg
Back in early November 2022, The Atlantic published an article by Brown University economist Emily Oster,2 who suggested COVID dictators be granted "amnesty" for their mistaken beliefs about COVID-19. "We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about COVID," she wrote. Her arguments were so ill-conceived, most of those who read it answered with colorful variations of "Not a chance."
January 30, 2023, medical student Kevin Bass followed in Oster's footsteps, penning an opinion piece for Newsweek in which he urges the scientific community to "admit we were wrong about COVID and it cost lives":3
"I staunchly supported the efforts of the public health authorities when it came to COVID-19. I believed that the authorities responded to the largest public health crisis of our lives with compassion, diligence, and scientific expertise. I was with them when they called for lockdowns, vaccines, and boosters. I was wrong. We in the scientific community were wrong. And it cost lives.
I can see now that the scientific community from the CDC to the WHO to the FDA and their representatives, repeatedly overstated the evidence and misled the public about its own views and policies, including on natural vs. artificial immunity, school closures and disease transmission, aerosol spread, mask mandates, and vaccine effectiveness and safety, especially among the young.
All of these were scientific mistakes at the time, not in hindsight … Our emotional response and ingrained partisanship prevented us from seeing the full impact of our actions on the people we are supposed to serve.
We systematically minimized the downsides of the interventions we imposed — imposed without the input, consent, and recognition of those forced to live with them. In so doing, we violated the autonomy of those who would be most negatively impacted by our policies: the poor, the working class, small business owners, Blacks and Latinos, and children …
Most of us did not speak up in support of alternative views, and many of us tried to suppress them … But the scorn that we laid on them was a disaster for public trust in the pandemic response."
Tucker Carlson Lauds Bass' Honesty
Quote:
Kevin Bass
@kevinnbass
My segment with the great
@TuckerCarlson
139K views
2:32 / 4:14
9:09 PM · Feb 6, 2023
396.8K
Views
Reviewing the Most Recent “Apology” for the COVID-19 Response
Analysis by A Midwestern Doctor
February 15, 2023
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...bid=1721821130
(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)
"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The catastrophic effects of the COVID-19 vaccines that were forcefully mandated onto the population are causing the general public to lose its trust in the medical establishment and the vaccine industry
A variety of limited apologies are being made to regain that trust without fixing the underlying issues that led to the disastrous COVID-19 policies being forced upon the population
The recent pseudo-apology in Newsweek has received widespread media exposure and highlights many of the catastrophic mistakes made throughout the pandemic that the medical industry is now trying to pivot away from.
Those mistakes must not be forgotten and some will be reviewed here
The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine mandates have backfired on the conventional vaccine industry, and we are now seeing a degree of skepticism toward all vaccines that I have never witnessed before in my lifetime. Given how dangerous the spike protein vaccines were, this outcome was entirely predictable, which has led many of us to wonder why the medical establishment chose to nonetheless push them (likewise, I put forward the best explanations I could see for this here).
One of the best explanations was shared with me by a pharmaceutical executive from a major vaccine manufacturer (there are only a few instances of people in these positions speaking out against the industry).
This official informed me that Pfizer has very few vaccines besides the incredibly profitable COVID-19 ones (this is also true for Moderna), so in essence, the rest of the vaccine industry was thrown under the bus for the mRNA manufacturers to make a killing off COVID-19.
Now consider the implications of current polling for both the vaccine industry and the general public's trust in the medical system: over a quarter of the American population know someone whom they believe was killed by the vaccines, and almost half believe that the COVID-19 vaccines are causing a large number of unexpected deaths.
To save the existing paradigm, some type of major pivot will have to be made by the medical industry and government agencies (this is also what Ed Dowd was recently told by a government insider). Biden’s recent State of the Union Address likewise provided strong evidence of this shift:
Quote:
Pierre Kory, MD MPA
1,806 Tweets
See new Tweets
Pierre Kory, MD MPA
@PierreKory
http://drpierrekory.com http://pierrekory.substack.com ICU & Lung Doc, Teacher/Researcher. Co-Developer of effective COVID Rx protocols with the giants of the FLCCC:http://flccc.net
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_banner...705590/600x200
Madison, WIdrpierrekory.comJoined October 2013
128 Following
321.7K Followers
I think there may be some great anagram combinations in 'Emily Oster'.
We can start with 'Tiresomely'.
Uninjected Have Same Nanotech, Clots, Graphene as Injected--Dr. Ana Mihalcea
2/15/23
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...m_medium=email
(I would think it depends somewhat on location, as some areas are being more heavily bombarded than others, but I don't doubt it's ubiquitous.)
"In this interview with the wonderful Maria Zeee, I explain that the Metal Nanoparticle Weapons Wetware that Mark Steele, a weapons expert, discusses, is in everyone. In Live blood analysis there is no difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated blood and the vast majority of the unvaccinated (>95%) have the Hydrogel/ Graphene Ribbons. This is a catastrophic finding for humanity. I show the reversal of the findings with EDTA Chelation and discuss my other protocol ingredients.
I explain in this explosive interview the blood clotting properties of Hydrogel that cause micro clotting in the unvaccinated as well. This is clearly visible in live blood analysis and correlates with elevated D-Dimers, that I have been seeing in the unvaccinated. Maria rightfully is enraged. If only the unvaccinated would realize what happened to them via self spreading vaccines, geoengineering, the poisoned food and water supply - and demand justice. May this information open many people’s eyes.
Do not miss this vital information."
Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v2734xk/?pub=ijro7
Posted by Ewan
‘Finally’ The Lancet Acknowledges Natural Immunity Superior to mRNA COVID Vaccines
By Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...c-dfd8764b2871
(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)
"Immunity acquired from past COVID-19 infection provides strong, lasting protection against severe outcomes from the illness at a level “as high if not higher” than that provided by mRNA vaccines, according to a study published Thursday in The Lancet.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...465-5/fulltext
Researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 65 studies worldwide, providing overwhelming evidence to support what many scientists, doctors and studies have said since early in the COVID-19 pandemic.
“The Lancet is finally acknowledging what doctors and scientists have been gaslit for saying for years — that natural immunity provides superior protection to experimental vaccines,” said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief litigation counsel for Children’s Health Defense.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...ural-immunity/
“Only the tsunami of propaganda and censorship from the pharma/government biosecurity cartel and the controlled media persuaded the public that Pfizer and Moderna were better at protecting the human immune system than God and evolution,” he added.
The study found that immunity acquired from infection was often far more robust and consistently waned more slowly than the immunity from two doses of an mRNA vaccine.
The researchers found that natural immunity was at least 88.9% effective against severe disease, hospitalization and death for all COVID-19 variants 10 months after infection.
It also provided 78.6% protection against reinfection for all variants except omicron BA.1, for which protection was 45.3%.
At an October 2022 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meeting, the CDC presented data showing that vaccine-acquired immunity after two or three injections dropped to zero six months after injection, and then became negative.
The Lancet study stated that “although protection from reinfection from all variants wanes over time, our analysis of the available data suggests that the level of protection afforded by previous infection is at least as high, if not higher than that provided by two-dose vaccination using high-quality mRNA vaccines (Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech).”
The study was funded in part by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Authors included Dr. Christopher Murray, director of The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, the Gates-funded institute that was “largely responsible for the notoriously exaggerated mortality calculations that overestimated COVID deaths by 20-fold at the COVID pandemic’s outset,” according to Kennedy.
The authors argued, based on their findings, that natural immunity should be recognized along with vaccines when authorities are considering restricting travel, access to venues and work based on immunization status.
Commenting on these conclusions, Dr. Meryl Nass, internist and epidemiologist, said:
“While framing this as an acknowledgment that natural immunity confers protection, what it is also doing is providing tacit agreement that government-imposed policies restricting travel are acceptable. It furthermore provides tacit approval of vaccine passports.”
The ‘cartel’s’ war on natural immunity
In October 2020, The Lancet published an article — “Scientific consensus on the COVID-19 pandemic: we need to act now” — by authors including CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, which was widely covered in the mainstream press. They stated that “there is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection” and that “the consequence of waning immunity would present a risk to vulnerable populations for the indefinite future.”
But in November 2021, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request forced the CDC to admit that it didn’t even collect data on natural immunity.
Then, in January 2022, the CDC was compelled to revise its position on natural immunity, acknowledging in a report that natural immunity against COVID-19 was at least three times as effective as vaccination at preventing people from becoming infected with the Delta variant.
The pharmaceutical companies were also aware of the benefits of naturally acquired immunity, although they suppressed that information, documents revealed.
In October 2021, Project Veritas exposed three Pfizer officials saying that antibodies lead to equal if not better protection against the virus compared to the vaccine, The Defender reported.
Later, in April 2022, Pfizer documents held by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and released under court order confirmed Pfizer knew natural immunity was as effective as the company’s COVID-19 vaccine at preventing severe illness, journalist Kim Iversen reported.
Most recently, the Twitter files revealed that a Pfizer board member who used to head the FDA lobbied Twitter to take action against a post accurately pointing out that natural immunity is superior to COVID-19 vaccination, The Epoch Times reported.
FOIA requests also revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci and his boss, National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins, colluded to suppress the Great Barrington Declaration, which argues that natural immunity plays an important role in mitigating public harm from COVID-19, The Defender reported.
The vaccines are failing, which means we need more vaccines
Media that reported on the study, including NBC, ABC and U.S. News & World Report, continue to advocate for vaccination as the more important way to protect against severe disease and death from COVID-19.
This is despite the fact that even vaccine advocates Bill Gates and Fauci admitted that COVID-19 vaccines perform poorly.
In a paper published last month in Cell Host and Microbe, Fauci and his co-authors confirmed that the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses, including influenza, coronaviruses, respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, and common colds “have not to date been effectively controlled by licensed or experimental vaccines.”
They concluded, “Durably protective vaccines against non-systemic mucosal respiratory viruses with high mortality rates have thus far eluded vaccine development efforts.”
Nass said that while it is quite significant for The Lancet to publish these findings about natural immunity, the authors’ framing, like the admissions by Gates and Fauci, “is intended to quietly, without apology, veer away from current COVID vaccines, while implying that more money is needed to develop new types of vaccines. No one made any mistakes. No one accepts any blame. Chris Murray never erred with his outlandish estimates. No, just send money and let us do the science.”
Crimes upcoming?
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/statu...620329984?s=20
RFK Jr's tweet about his organization's above article posted by onawah, spreading the message
https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/...347747841?s=20
https://thefederalist.com/2023/02/21...reat-covid-19/
Doctors Sue FDA For Prohibiting Ivermectin To Treat Covid-19
BY: VICTORIA MARSHALL
FEBRUARY 21, 2023
https://thefederalist.com/wp-content...M-1200x675.png
A group of doctors is suing the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services for their various attempts at preventing ivermectin from being prescribed to treat Covid-19. Plaintiffs Robert L. Apter, Mary Talley Bowden, and Paul E. Marik argued the FDA tried to prohibit them from prescribing the drug, even though they have successfully used it in treating patients with the coronavirus.
“The FDA generally cannot ban particular uses of human drugs once they are otherwise approved and admitted to the market, even if such use differs from the labeling — commonly referred to as ‘off-label’ use,” the lawsuit argues. “The FDA also cannot advise whether a patient should take an approved drug for a particular purpose.”
But the FDA overstepped its authority by “directing the public, including health professionals and patients, not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19, even though the drug remains fully approved for human use,” the lawsuit continues. The aim of the suit is to set aside “any FDA actions that direct or opine on whether ivermectin is an appropriate treatment for COVID-19, declare such actions unlawful, and issue permanent injunctive relief enjoining the FDA from further engaging in such actions.”
The plaintiffs originally filed their lawsuit in June 2022 — after the FDA and corporate media spun up the narrative that ivermectin is used as a cattle dewormer and that anyone who prescribed or took the drug as a Covid treatment was an anti-science rube — but a U.S. district court denied their claim. In February 2023, the doctors appealed their case to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Multiple groups have filed amicus briefs in support of the suit, including America’s Frontline Doctors and the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC).
“This was a coordinated campaign amongst the agencies to limit the use of ivermectin,” Pierre Kory, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC, told The Federalist. “Multiple actions taken by the CDC and FDA, as well as the media over a two-week period were triggered by the release of data showing that there were 90,000 prescriptions being filled for ivermectin by the middle of August.”
Kory described the collusion among the FDA, CDC, and corporate media as a massive disinformation campaign.
“For two weeks, all you heard was ‘horse dewormer,'” Kory said. “And the effects were massive. Hospitals started removing it from their formularies, pharmacists stopped filling. Doctors became scared to prescribe because they didn’t want to go against the agencies and take the risks on their licenses.”
Even celebrities who took ivermectin as a treatment for Covid-19, such as podcast host Joe Rogan and Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers, were victims of a public smear campaign and derided for taking “horse dewormer,” despite both figures recovering quickly from their illness. As Kory explained, however, the massive propaganda campaign wasn’t really about ivermectin at all, but rather the use of repurposed or “off-label” drugs.
“Repurposed drugs are the Achilles heel of the entire business model of the pharmaceutical industry,” Kory said. “And when you see our health agencies literally working in the service of the pharmaceutical industry by destroying the credibility of repurposed drugs, it’s terrifying. They’re not working according to the interests of patients or physicians but the pharmaceutical companies.”
By prohibiting the use of “off-label” drugs to treat Covid, public health officials and federal bureaucrats put the interests of Big Pharma over patients. As such, physicians were scared to prescribe off-label drugs, a common practice within the medical community, for fear of losing their licenses. How many needless Covid deaths or severe infections might have been prevented if not for this false public intimidation campaign?
later add
https://twitter.com/EmeraldRobinson/...318641153?s=20
Names & Faces of 150 Bilderbergers who controlled COVID Pandemic response
Over 150 Bilderbergers (of the 1,861 who are still alive) have played important parts in the Covid-19 event. Many, perhaps most, of the below have been active in various roles; this page attempts to name and shame them and reveal the roles they have played.
The above link contains an audio of the article, as well as a link to download the article in PDF format - 42 pages.