WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia

Quote:

---

Posted by Rizotto

Interesting analysis. The theory is that US intelligence foresaw that Russia would cyberattack critical systems in Kiev, so they decided to have Zelensky over in Washington for his safety. (Personally, I'm not so sure they really want to keep Zelensky 'safe' at this time.) But the cyber attacks on Kiev systems are puzzling, because I haven't seen reports of that anywhere else. On the other hand, that's something Russia is quite adept at, having done it a number of times already. So, perhaps not something that merits too much specific attention during wartime. Just my guess.

The Fall | Zelensky Was Evacuated While Ukraine Is Paralyzed. Military Summary For 2023.12.12
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WSKzHrHNkdU

---

So, there is a December 13, 2023 RT report of a cyber attack on Ukraine telecommunications, posted below, but I haven't seen other reports yet.
(This cyber attack on Ukraine seems to have occurred almost at the same time as the one in the USA...)

https://www.rt.com/business/588997-u...attack-russia/

Millions of Ukrainians forced offline: who’s behind one of the biggest ever cyberattacks
The IT systems of Ukraine's largest telecommunications operator have been partially destroyed

Ukraine’s primary mobile network provider, Kyivstar, has been brought down by what is described as one of the biggest cyberattacks ever, leaving millions of customers without mobile phones and home internet service on Tuesday.
1. What happened?
Ukraine's largest telecommunications provider suffered a major hacker attack on Tuesday, knocking out mobile phone service to millions of people. Mobile communications and access to the internet were down throughout the day. The attack on Kyivstar, which has 24.3 million mobile customers and over 1 million home internet subscribers, has led to a ripple effect that has caused outages of IT infrastructure and disrupted services at banks and some state institutions.

2. Who was affected?
The cyberattack caused a widely felt technical failure and disrupted the operations of many of Ukraine’s major financial institutions. The largest state-owned bank, PrivatBank, was affected by the hack as the work of some of its offices, ATMs, and point-of-sale (POS) terminals used by businesses to process card payments was disrupted because they rely on Kyivstar SIM cards. Some cash machines of other big banks, including Oshadbank and Monobank, were not working either. Air raid alert systems in the city of Sumy also reportedly malfunctioned due to the outage.

3. Why is it significant?
The incident has heavily impacted Kiev and far beyond, including major cities and regions, affecting mobile and fixed-line services with a knock-on impact on sectors, including airstrike alert systems and banking. The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) said on Wednesday that the attack on Kyivstar has inflicted critical damage to its digital infrastructure, with IT systems being partially destroyed. Restoring operations will take time, the service said.
The Ukrainian military relies heavily on smartphones and mobile data to communicate and coordinate operations, especially on encrypted messaging applications. While the country has other cell phone providers and the military uses Starlink satellite connection extensively, the Kyivstar outage could affect Ukrainian troops’ ability to coordinate in some places.

4. What’s the significance of the timing of the incident?
The massive hack occurred as Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky met with US President Joe Biden and lawmakers in Washington, DC on Tuesday, pleading for more funding for Kiev. During the meeting, the US leader announced another military aid package of $200 million for Ukraine, which includes air defense interceptors, artillery, and ammunition. However, the sum is relatively insignificant compared to the $111 billion in military and economic assistance Washington has provided to Kiev since February 2022.
The meeting occurred after a bill intended to provide $60 billion in aid for Kiev was blocked in the US Senate last week. Republicans demanded tougher immigration control on the southern US border in exchange for approving Ukraine assistance.

5. Who is behind the attack?
Ukraine’s SBU intelligence agency has alleged that Russian security services could be to blame. The agency opened criminal proceedings over the cyberattack under eight charges, including unauthorized interference in the work of information systems, high treason, and sabotage.
Meanwhile, Russian hacktivist group Killnet claimed responsibility for the attack in a post on its Telegram channel but did not provide evidence. Following the breach, Russian hackers said they launched the attack to test the capabilities of a new partnership with another group called Deanon Club.
The cyberattack comes as experts are deliberating on possible reasons for the incident, which could be part of Moscow’s effort to force Kiev to negotiate a peace deal to end the ongoing Ukraine conflict. It is assumed that local officials will prepare to ensure other critical infrastructure is insulated from cyberattacks during the winter months.

6. Any other suspects?
The Kyivstar attack looked quite similar to last year’ cyberattack against the Russian YouTube analog called RuTube, some IT experts concluded after analyzing details of the incident. Experts suggested that the attack on the Ukrainian mobile provider could have been self-inflicted, adding that Kiev had previously simulated the collapse of critical infrastructure. Analysts assumed that Kyivstar was hacked “from the inside” precisely during Zelensky’s visit to Washington in order to stir media attention.

7. How did Kiev retaliate?
In a separate statement, Ukraine’s military intelligence claimed to have carried out a cyberattack on Russia’s Federal Taxation Service (FNS) in recent days. The SBU announced on its Telegram channel that Ukrainian military intelligence managed to break into one of the well-protected central servers of the federal tax service.
Commenting on the announcement, the FNS has denied its services were hacked, adding that it was working as usual while users’ personal data was safe.

Vladimir Putin is holding the annual press event where members of the public and journalists are invited to ask questions directly to him.

Here he comments on Odessa and it's being posted here not because we don't already know this of course, but here is a real leader prepared to put himself in a kind of firing line of questioning, something which I don't remember ever seeing on British television to any prime minister. The translation audio is in English:

"Odessa is a Russian city, everyone is aware of that, but they conjured up historical nonsense, and after the collapse of the USSR we gave into it", Vladimir Putin noted.

.

On the question of whether NATO is mobilizing for war with Russia... either officially or unofficially -

A few points as I see it...

1. the Neo Fascist West Based Globalists want to take control of Russia one way or another for a One World Government to be put in place - Russia is the largest country in the world re land mass...with a rich supply of natural resources - and is currently a thorn in the side of the wanna~be world dictators...

2. Ukraine and it's people have been shamelessly used by the afore mentioned Globalists and their puppets to start the process of taking over (or holding after internal unrest) Russia by military means.... provoking confrontation and trying to move right up to Ukraine/Russia border... Russia was, essentially, forced to step in to protect itself + East Ukraine with it's Special Military Operation .... and inevitably, because of the interference by NATO nations the whole thing is getting more drawn out and Russia is being further drawn in... the reason that Boris Johnson was sent in to scupper Peace Talks between Ukraine and Russia at the beginning (on behalf of the Globalists who run NATO) was because engaging Russia in war and eventually taking it over - is the plan...

So NATO mobilizing against Russia is inevitable at some point otherwise why was the whole thing started in the first place ....ie the US / Globalist backed coup in Ukraine in 2014....

The Globalists have a strategy of doubling down not backing down so this whole ridiculous situation may have to go the whole way to it's deadly conclusions.....and God help us all because our (Western) political leaders appear to be in cahoots with the Globalist's plan...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

something could happen to change the NATO mobilization plans - but I'd say that at the moment they are planning to go ahead with that strategy... covertly at first and then overtly..

Quote:

---

Posted by Bill Ryan

No, NATO is not "mobilizing for direct war with Russia." :facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

My strong personal advice: :bearhug:

Stick with Alexander Mercouris (his channel here) and Judge Napolitano's many superb guests (his channel here), and then you'll know what's happening with no screaming clickbait hyperbole. (This is one of several reasons why I ignore Alex Jones now.) There's little need for anyone or anything else if one's short of time and wants to go directly to the best and most professional daily analysis.

---

Coming up in just a few minutes is a livestream, hosted by the Duran, featuring an in-depth conversation between Alexander Mercouris and former-CIA Larry Johnson, one of Judge Napolitano's regular twice-a-week guests.

Johnson, like Mercouris, is exceptionally well-informed, articulate, passionate and aware, and has just returned from Moscow where he was visiting for a week (and talking with MANY Russian officials) with Alastair Crooke, Eva Bartlett and Pepe Escobar.

https://www.sott.net/image/s34/69473...356_46879a.jpg

https://youtube.com/watch?v=RR81psBNAKU

New from The Moon of Alabama:

• https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/1...aine.html#more

Accepting Defeat in Ukraine

In early November the Economist published an interview and several pieces by the commander in chief of the Ukrainian army, General Zaluzny. As I summarized:

Zaluzny's central thesis is that the war is currently at a stalemate. It has become positional, with no large maneuvers being possible. He compares it to the war in Europe in 1917. There, he says, a change only happened through the introduction of new technologies (i.e. tanks).
...
I for one think that Zaluzny is mistaken. The war is not at a stalemate. Russia has clearly the advantage as it is free to maneuver along the whole frontline and to attack wherever it likes. It does not do so in full force because the current situation allows it to conveniently fulfill the order its commander in chief had given to it - to destroy the military capabilities of Ukraine.

Finally a western mainstream writer has caught up with those facts. Lee Hockstader, the Washington Post's columnist for European affairs, opines:

In Ukraine, the risk isn’t stalemate. It’s defeat.

Hockstader laments the lack of support from the U.S. and Europe for the new demands the Ukraine is making. He states:

Without those infusions of cash, arms and munitions, even the disappointing status quo over the past year, in which Ukraine has not managed to recapture much territory, is unlikely to endure. Andriy Yermak, a top aide to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, told a Washington forum last week that the “big risk” is that Kyiv’s troops could “lose this war.”
That message should jolt policymakers on both sides of the Atlantic. The danger, as Ukraine’s top general warned publicly last month, isn’t simply stalemate. It is that Ukrainian forces, running low on equipment, might be compelled to fall back, shorten their defensive lines and abandon territory.
...
It’s essential to think about what Ukraine’s defeat means, because it would be as much a strategic disaster for the United States and its NATO allies as a tableau of terror for Ukraine. Dual cataclysms, equally stark, played out on different timetables.

Well, yes. The West has shot its wad and it proved to be sterile.

There will be no terror for Ukraine, just the loss of the ethnic Russian people, industries and land the communist - Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev - had for whatever reasons attached to it. The rest of it will be a smaller, more poor and purely agricultural rump state without access to the sea. This was obvious from the very beginning to anyone with a clear view of the balance of the forces involved in the war.

As I wrote on February 24 2022, the very day Russian forces entered Ukraine:

Looking at this map I believe that the most advantageous end state for Russia would be the creation of a new independent country, call it Novorussiya, on the land east of the Dnieper and south along the coast that holds a majority ethnic Russian population and that, in 1922, had been attached to the Ukraine by Lenin. That state would be politically, culturally and militarily aligned with Russia.
https://www.moonofalabama.org/11i/ukradded-s.jpg
bigger

This would eliminate Ukrainian access to the Black Sea and create a land bridge towards the Moldavian breakaway Transnistria which is under Russian protection.

Excursus:

The yellow part of that map marked 'Ukraine in 1654' was actually the land of the Eastern Orthodox Zaporozhian Cossacks. Under threat from the Catholic Lithuanian-Polish Commonwealth, which at the time held the green parts under serfdom, they negotiated the Pereiaslav Agreement (1654) with Russia and pledged allegiance to the Tsar. They area thus became an autonomous part of Russia.

End Excursus

The rest of the Ukraine would be a land confined, mostly agricultural state, disarmed and too poor to be build up to a new threat to Russia anytime soon. Politically it would be dominated by fascists from Galicia which would then become a major problem for the European Union.

Thanks to Stalin's additions to the Ukraine three countries, Poland, Hungary and Romania, have claims to certain areas in the Ukraine's western regions. If they want to snatch those up again it is now probably the best time to do so. Despite being part of NATO, which likely would not support such moves, those three will have domestic policy difficulties to withstand the urge.

Since then we learned that Novorussiya will not be an independent state but a genuine part of Russia. So be it. Meanwhile analysts like Hockstader still delve in fantasies:

A complete Ukrainian military collapse is unlikely, at least in coming months. Kyiv’s armed forces remain well-led and motivated, and they are husbanding equipment to prepare for shortfalls. But it is equally unlikely to expect a negotiated cease-fire with Russia that would maintain existing battle lines. To believe in that seemingly anodyne outcome is to misjudge Putin — again.

This is not misjudging Putin, but misjudging the capabilities left to Ukraine. It has run out of men and material. There are daily videos of this or that Ukrainian army unit condemning its leaders and announcing to leave its positions. The potential of a collapse of Ukrainian army is real.

On November 2 I also wrote about the 47th Ukrainian brigade:

During the last days tanks from the 47th brigade (Leo 2) and 10th mountain brigade (T-64BM/BV) have been seen, and were destroyed, near Avdiivka. Both brigades had only recently been mauled during their hopeless attacks at the southern front. It does not make sense to throw what is left of them into another battle without reconstituting them. The whole experience and knowledge these brigades had gained will be lost with them.

Yesterday, the Ukraine friendly Military Watch Magazine confirmed my opinion:

Ukraine’s Elite 47th Mechanised Brigade Surrounded and Low on Ammunition: Critical Front Faces Collapse

The Ukrainian Army’s elite 47th Mechanised Brigade stationed in the town of Avdiivka in the disputed Donetsk region has been surrounded and forced to contend with growing ammunition shortages, according to multiple reports from Ukrainian and Western sources. British reports indicate that the brigade was meant to attack a Russian column before it linked up with assault infantry on the northern flank of Avdievka, but failed to do so due to a lack of ammunition. The brigade’s efforts to stop the advance of Russian forces in Avdievka were described by The Times as “desperate,” fuelling perceptions of an “inevitable collapse” of Ukrainian positions, and diminished hope of preventing a Russian victory by the beginning of the New Year holidays.
...
A serviceman from the 47th Brigade, cited only as Sergeant Danylo, observing when interviewed over the past week “a ****ty situation” as the shell shortage forced soldiers to make impossible life-and-death decisions.“We had 10 times more ammunition over summer, and better quality… American rounds come in batches of almost identical weights, which makes it easier to correct fire, with very few duds. Now we have shells from all over the world with different qualities, and we only get 15 for three days. Last week we got a batch full of duds.” Thus instead of firing on Russians as soon as they came within range, Ukrainian personnel increasingly had to wait to be sure the Russians were heading for their positions and to only engage large groups. Munitions produced by European states have very frequently been faulted for their quality, and at times been considered near useless, with Italian equipment being particularly notorious for its poor quality, in contrast to superior equipment either inherited from the Soviet era or produced in by the United States.

Now tell me again that these are "well-led and motivated" forces which are "husbanding equipment to prepare for shortfalls". Neither rings true to me.

Hockstader continues:

For the Kremlin dictator, a “compromise” would involve Ukraine’s subjugation and dissolution as an independent state. That would include regime change, with Zelensky in exile (or dead), as well as an end to Kyiv’s aspirations to join the E.U. or NATO.
...
If he is right, the timetable of that ending would be accelerated if Congress and the E.U. fail to approve fresh support. That would leave Ukraine’s government unable to maintain basic services, and its military increasingly short of artillery ammunition, air defense capability and other equipment. Ukraine’s already badly battered front-line forces would become more brittle. Russian territorial gains would be accompanied by murders, rapes, kidnapping of children and other Russian war crimes on a chilling scale.

That grim scenario would be a staggering blow to Western prestige and credibility, revealing that pledges to back Ukraine for “as long as it takes” were empty.

Yes, those pledges, by Biden and others, were indeed empty. That is why he has recently changed his talk:

Amid a Republican standoff and polarizing politics that puts new aid to Ukraine at risk, President Joe Biden emphasized his administration's willingness to support Ukraine, but the language was different. He said the US will be there for Kyiv "as long as we can." It's a change in tune from previous messaging that the US would be a staunch and fierce ally to Ukraine, aiding it for "as long as it takes" to defeat Russia's invasion.

The West can no longer support the proxy war it had started.

History will now follow its destined path.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Pckz1K8Ou3w

Putin: There Will be Peace When Russia Achieves Military Op's Goals 6 hours ago

MOSCOW (Sputnik) - Ukraine does not want to agree on its demilitarization, because of this Russia is forced to use other measures, Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday.

"As for demilitarization, they [Ukrainians] do not want to come to an agreement, well, then we are forced to take other measures, including military ones," Putin said during the joint "Direct Line" Q&A session and annual press conference, adding that the denazification of Ukraine is still on the agenda.
There will be peace when Russia achieves the goals of the special military operation, he added.
Ukraine does not want to negotiate on its demilitarization, and because of this Russia is forced to resort to other measures, Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday.

Ukraine no longer produces almost anything, although it is trying to preserve the remnants of industry, the Russian president said.

"They get everything... for free, but all the free stuff it may end sometime. And, apparently, this is how it ends little by little," Putin added.

The West has delivered everything that it promised to deliver to Ukraine, and even more, but Russia is destroying this military equipment during its military operation, Putin added.

https://sputnikglobe.com/20231214/pu...115572687.html

Russian Airborne Forces Ex-Commander: NATO Counteroffensive Plan Bad, New Ukraine Strategy Worse 9 minutes ago

The Russian Armed Forces have shifted to the offensive in the special military operation zone and are making progress along the entire contact line, President Vladimir Putin said during his annual press conference.

Russia's 617,000-strong military contingent is presently improving its positions along the almost 2,000 kilometer-long contact line, President Putin told attendees at his annual press conference. What's behind the development?
The failure of the Ukrainian counteroffensive has exposed the ineffectiveness of NATO's strategic planning and outdated doctrines, says retired Colonel General Georgy Shpak, ex-commander of the Russian Airborne Forces.
"[NATO] placed its bet on Ukraine making it carry out a counteroffensive," Shpak told Sputnik. "They organized and planned it. But the counteroffensive failed, because the [Russian military] foresaw [their steps], built good defenses worthy of the Russian army and withstood numerous attacks."

"Now we have moved on to the second stage of this operation: to disable as much [Ukrainian] equipment and personnel as possible. This second stage is essentially coming to an end, because the Ukrainian army is exhausted, they lack manpower, their reserves are depleted, their money has run out, almost all of their equipment has been knocked out. This is the result of the work of American and British [military] advisers," the retired colonel general continued.

NATO war planners failed to calculate the effects of many key factors, according to the military expert.
"They did not take into account current modern conditions, the huge number of [Russian] aerial vehicles that are designed for reconnaissance, observation, adjustment, and strikes. They didn't take this into account. They hoped that if they struck in several directions, our defenses would crack, but we held the line."

Shpak was also highly sceptical of NATO's 2024 strategy for Ukraine, which envisages digging in and building up forces for a possible new offensive.

"I would say that it is even worse than their counter-offensive," the general said. "Not a single defensive structure can withstand strikes of modern powerful weapons. Furthermore, it's impossible to build reinforced concrete fortifications which are over 1,000 kilometers long and 20-30 meters deep, with enormous coverage. This is all nonsense. It’s impossible to build something like that. There will still be gaps here and there, failures here and there."

"This is all theory. For me, as a military man, it’s just like a children’s fairy tale, not a thought-out plan. They have abruptly shifted from a counteroffensive to an all-out defense. I believe this will lead to their defeat," Shpak added.

https://sputnikglobe.com/20231214/ru...115587473.html

Text:
🇷🇺 Putin on mobilization.

1. In total, 300,000 people were mobilized through partial mobilization.
2. 244,000 of them are still in the NWO zone.
3. 41,000 have already returned home for various reasons.
4. 486,000 signed up for contract service.
5. 1500 people per day sign up for a contract.
6. 14 mobilized have already become heroes of Russia.
7. There will be no new wave of mobilization.
8. All volunteers must be in the same conditions as the military.

ISZ reports

https://x.com/djuric_zlatko/status/1735345178666274832

Text:
Intel Slava Z:

“🇺🇲🇺🇦 The US supported Kyiv as long as it served its own interests

Vladimir Zelensky came to Washington to ask Congress to approve further support for Ukraine. But he is no longer greeted as a hero, as he was in 2022, and this is easy to explain, writes the Global Times.

▪️Such a drastic change in attitude towards him in the United States shows that the true nature of the so-called commitment to Kyiv has always been tied to the interests of America, and not to concern for the Ukrainian people, the publication emphasizes, citing an analyst.

In Congress, negotiations on assistance to Kyiv are at a critical phase. The fact is that in the eyes of Republicans, Zelensky is closely associated with the administration of Democrat Biden . And the American electorate believes that the United States is spending too much on Ukraine.

“ The almost two-year conflict in Ukraine did not lead to the fall of Russia, as the West had hoped. Instead, the high inflation caused by the crisis has brought enormous suffering to its own population, and there is growing reluctance in the US and Europe to help Kiev ,” says expert Cui Heng .

In this regard, the Chinese analyst advises Ukraine to finally realize that “friendship with the United States is associated with risks.”

https://x.com/djuric_zlatko/status/1735344994406302154

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Text:
⚡️The Americans most likely blew up the Nord Stream - Putin

The President also clarified that Europe’s lack of gas supply is not Russia’s problem: “we were not the ones who closed and blew up gas pipelines.”

❗️Putin also added that Russia does not do anything for political reasons. In terms of gas, no changes are planned either.

By the way, Putin said that Ukraine continues to use Russian gas 🤷‍♀️

https://x.com/djuric_zlatko/status/1735303907797078048

Text:
The goals of the special operation do not change - Putin

📝 “There will be peace when we achieve our goals, they do not change,” the president answered the question about the timing of the SVO.

He recalled these goals: denazification, demilitarization, neutral status of Ukraine.

📝 “They don’t want to agree, well, we are forced to use other, military measures,” Putin added.

https://x.com/djuric_zlatko/status/1735229289040068681

Text:
🇺🇦 More than 60 thousand women already serve in the Armed Forces of Ukraine - media with reference to the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine

Now the number of women in the ranks of the Ukrainian army has grown to 62 thousand people, which is more than 7% of the total composition of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. And this is 50% more than before the SVO.

Moreover, if previously it was mainly doctors and signalmen who were taken to the front, now everyone receives summonses. Moreover, the Kiev Nazi regime is going further and is going to make the mobilization of women mandatory.

Yesterday, Rada deputy Bezuglaya said that in this case, women will have a “unique delay” for pregnancy. They say that if a woman becomes pregnant, she will not be able to be drafted to the front. Although footage from the front suggests the opposite - recently the Russian Armed Forces captured a military officer in position. - Ostashko reports

https://x.com/djuric_zlatko/status/1735224343116833035

Quote:

---

Posted by Ewan

...

---

When I shared the link at the time, I saw an embedded video explaining it all ... and it was ultra fresh/new! Because of the nature of the importance, I thought it maybe good to share it, even if it had no "summarized" texts yet.

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

Text:
🇺🇸💸 The US Congress has adopted an $880-billion draft defense budget for the 2024 fiscal year — with $800 million earmarked for Ukraine. US President Joe Biden will quickly ratify the bill, even though the sum is much less than the Biden administration initially wanted — $61 billion. Enough legislators in the House backed the $883.7 billion defense bill for the measure to pass.

geopolitics_live

https://x.com/dana916/status/1735341505282191656

https://x.com/djuric_zlatko/status/1735359568480276640

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Text:
Bad news for the West:

Russia will spend $160 billion on defense and security in 2024 and the Russian Finance Minister calls it the victory budget. Russia pays 75% less for similar or better weapon systems compared to the US / NATO because Russia doesn’t allow its defense industry to rip them off.

So any plane, missile, tank or artillery ammunition costs Russia only 25% of what the US is paying. This means that a $160 billion Russian military budget is comparable to $640 billion in the United States.

It’s also worth noting that Russia doesn’t waste trillions on fancy Navy ships and fighter jets that don’t work. Instead it has focused on building the most powerful nuclear arsenal in the world, long range hypersonic missiles that can sink airplane carriers and autonomous nuclear powered torpedoes that travers the oceans without ever needing to refuel. They carry the largest nuclear warheads known to men and are nearly undetectable.

Imagine the most powerful nuclear explosion on the shores of New York City generating a hundred meter tall tsunami of radioactive water destroying the entire city and turning it into an uninhabitable wasteland for centuries.

In addition Russia has a fleet of Super EMP satellites in a high orbit above Earth with nuclear payloads. When detonated they can destroy the entire power grid and all civilian telecommunication systems in the US in an instant.

The US military is used to fighting the least sophisticated enemies. It’s easy to bully any nation that doesn’t have peer capabilities. The US Govt killed over 20 million people in 37 victim nations since WW2 but it never bullied anyone who could destroy the United States, until now.

Americans and citizens of NATO countries need to understand that the West cannot win against Russia on the battlefield. Every day without diplomacy and peace negotiations is bringing humanity closer to self-destruction. You already know that the Biden administration is the most inept and embarrassing Government America has ever had.

Don’t let those arrogant, corrupt and incompetent fools destroy the world. Demand peace. Don’t wait until it’s too late.

https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1735286940088561729

Text:
The Canada Files: Canada's Immigration Minister Marc Miller is already hinting Canada may ignore the 🇺🇦 government which wants its citizens who came to 🇨🇦 under the CUAET (Canada-Ukraine authorization for emergency travel) program after Russia's SMO began, to come back post-NATO proxy war.

https://theglobeandmail.com/politics...tly-in-canada/

Given Canada's creation of and support to the Nazi honouring Ukrainian Canadian Congress for 80+ years, these imported Ukrainians would likely remain under their influence and bolster their numbers. Most of the 210k Ukrainians brought to Canada via CUAET want to stay.

https://thecanadafiles.com/articles/...edical-section

These new Ukrainians in Canada also are highly likely to be opposed to Russia's SMO, and are a useful addition to Canada's labour force.
@jimmylives306
said this about usage of the CUAET program:

"This was always the plan. Canada saw the war in Ukraine as a way to easily migrate a white workforce.
What’s never mentioned is that half of Ukrainians who’ve come to Canada under the CUAET program weren’t residing in Ukraine at the time of the invasion and hadn’t done so in several years. Many were not in crisis and the ones who were, waited the longest and are still waiting."
https://x.com/jimmylives306/status/1...831825717?s=20
https://truthb.substack.com/p/only-t...medium=reader2
https://truthb.substack.com/p/real-r...medium=reader2

There are *echoes* of the importation of Ukrainian Nazis post-WWII for labour, and their usage in suppressing organized labour post WWII.

https://thecanadafiles.com/articles/ukcdnm

The broader Ukrainian anti-communist importation's impact can be seen in the Nazi apologia or refusal to condemn Nazis, of MP Chrystia Freeland & MP Yvan Baker.

https://thecanadafiles.com/articles/...zi-ss-division

This is part of Canada's 75+ year project to import reactionaries & anti-communists to uphold Canadian colonialism & imperialism.

https://thecanadafiles.com/articles/...ter-it-spawned

In that vein, Uygur dissidents will join the Canadian military, among the 10k Uygur 'refugees' to be imported here beginning in April 2024.

https://thecanadafiles.com/articles/...-into-military

TCF's Telegram: https://t.me/thecanadafiles/387

https://x.com/TheCanadaFiles/status/1735282112771567663

https://x.com/mazzenilsson/status/1735439233261736423

Text:


Zlatti71
@djuric_zlatko
🇭🇺 Orban has refused to support Ukraine's rapid accession to the EU. The Hungarian prime minister said it would have devastating consequences for Europe.

"Ukraine's rapid accession to the European Union will have devastating consequences for Europe, the EU budget and European security. It is not in the interests of Hungary or the European Union," the prime minister said. He added that he could in no way support the idea of the country joining the alliance soon.

Vid by
@uranews


@ukraine_watch

https://x.com/djuric_zlatko/status/1735374338507870294

https://tass.com/politics/1721001?ut..._referrer=t.co

Putin proclaims Odessa Russian city, challenges Ukraine's historical narrative

At the same time, the president noted that once upon a time "Vladimir Lenin gave away the whole of Ukraine when he created the Soviet Union"

MOSCOW, December 14. /TASS/. Odessa is a Russian city and everyone is well aware of this, Russian President Vladimir Putin said at the combined Direct Line Q&A session and year-end press conference.

"The whole southeast of Ukraine has always been pro-Russian, because these are historically Russian territories. Turkey knows this well, the entire Black Sea coast went to Russia as a result of the Russo-Turkish wars. What does Ukraine have to do with this? It has nothing to do with it. Neither Crimea, nor the entire Black Sea coast in general," Putin said in response to a TASS question. "Odessa is a Russian city. We know this. Everyone knows this. But no, they drummed up all sorts of historical nonsense," he pointed out.

At the same time, the president noted that once upon a time "Vladimir Lenin gave away the whole of Ukraine when he created the Soviet Union." "We came to terms with this after the collapse of the Soviet Union. We accepted it and were ready to live in this paradigm," the Russian president emphasized. "But this part, the southeast [of Ukraine], is pro-Russian. It was also important for us," he underscored.

Putin explained that the residents of these territories had always voted for those who "went along with the pro-Russian agenda of Ukraine's domestic and foreign policy," and in general "Russia was quite satisfied with that." "But after the coup in 2014, it became clear to us that we would not be allowed <...> to establish normal relations with Ukraine," the Russian leader added.

https://x.com/Blackrussiantv/status/1735313931642495276

https://x.com/dana916/status/1735377906061267075