Quote:
Posted by
Bill Ryan
Quote:
Posted by
wegge
I looked into Tom Bearden's book "Gravitobiology" yesterday. It seems the Russians had highly advanced EM weapons in the 1950s and 60s. So this modern today war seems to be fought mainly with kindergarden tech, compared to what must be available. Makes one wonder why.
Yes, I agree, and I've often thought exactly the same thing. I wonder why as well, and I can't see any simple answers. :)
It would be like using the S-500.
You don't even want to "turn something on"
unless it is a last resort.
So far I have found *two* CIA reports from the 1970s explaining the Soviets were also deep into medical plasma research...and that this is something the west should also look into...because they ignored it, and all similar research went into mind reading, thought control, telekinesis, pyrokinesis, i. e. the weaponized versions of whatever a machine or human being could do using "advanced electronics". So I can promise you, on the medical aspect, the west lags by 60+ years or have just entered the "proof of concept" phase.
As to the weaponized aspect, I'll reserve judgment.
I mean, we spent so many years screaming "nuclear war" that was
never real.
Perhaps I should repeat, Russia has the capability to sanitize every American population center plus natural weaknesses like the San Andreas and Yellowstone Faults in a matter of hours. That's what will happen if you manage to scare them.
If not, then, no, I don't see why they would roll out anything particularly "advanced", especially since the game is still to reduce American tech with essentially hand grenades.
So far we have seen limited use of Father of All Bombs and Kinjhal--which are bad enough. Obviously, they could vaporize Kiev at will, and the fact of this not happening shows a very conservative approach, with no reason to change it.