The Fall of the House of Windsor?

Very good 13 minute interview with Forbes contributor and public relations expert in crisis management Molly McPherson. She's convinced that all is definitely not OK behind the scenes at the Palace - something has gone wrong, possibly with the 'succession' after Charles, aka Kate and its the Palace who are screwing things up (distractions) while they sort out what to do.
She goes into very interesting detail about the non-committal 'statements' that have been released by them so far, what's 'off' about them and how this is being used to buy time.
Some interesting comments below, too.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=R61J_99GHJU[/url]

Erik: " Another possibility that comes to mind is that she has had some work done to her face, hence the younger looking facial expressions."

You might be right about that one, though not for cosmetic reasons. As the Royals are 100% about appearance and protocol and all that stuff, stands to reason they could be keeping her back until some healing has been done. She could well have self-harmed, including her face (mental breakdown) and how on earth would the palace PR machine explain that one?
l

Breaking news:
The Princess of Wales has revealed she has been diagnosed with cancer in an emotional message to the British public.

https://x.com/GBNEWS/status/1771235925013500188

My assumption is that this video message is a bit more of the truth than we had before. But I think it would be naïve (given the number of times the public have been lied to so far) to suppose that what the Princess is saying here is the whole truth, and free from misleading spin.

It's certainly true in the fact that it's actually her.

The rest is questionable, but be very silent in your questioning because they've got us right where they want us now.

Those horrible insensitive people at a time like this . . .etc . . .etc . .

I've become very skeptical, and I would not make any bets that this is, indeed, Kate. With clones and masks so readily available, the real story may be far from this....just sayin', imo.

This is sad. I wish she had come out with this weeks ago. It would've (hope fully) put a stop to all the lurid conjecture, mine included. The palace must learn the lessons from this.
Now hopefully a new storm will arise - about the reasons for the cancer 'plague' afflicting so many.

Quote:

---

Posted by norman

It's certainly true in the fact that it's actually her.

The rest is questionable, but be very silent in your questioning because they've got us right where they want us now.

Those horrible insensitive people at a time like this . . .etc . . .etc . .

---

Indeed norman, I've just seen links to a couple of national newspaper vids that are saying in a nutshell "nasty, wicked trolls, back off".

It does seem to be her, she does look as well as she did before; nothing like the gaunt person at the farm shop who was obviously a lookalike, I guess a tabloid stunt.

So, why are my spidey senses tingling? Maybe because I will never forget a former colleague who had some mates in the music industry in London. She told me that they all knew in the business that a world-famous singer didn't step down for months because of breast cancer treatment, but for secret heroin rehab.

I'm not saying that Kate is a user, not at all. Just saying, you may be told something but it doesn't mean that it's true. The only truth that I know is that we are still in the dark.

Has anyone heard any more about Thomas Kingston's mysterious death? No, me neither.

Quote:

---

Posted by Eric J (Viking)

As the public in Britain and around the world demand the royal family release proof of life.

---

This seemed to have pushed her/them into doing the short video. Strange, that proof of life is usually terminology used in hostage situations.

Quote:

---

Posted by wondering

I've become very skeptical, and I would not make any bets that this is, indeed, Kate. With clones and masks so readily available, the real story may be far from this....just sayin', imo.

---

You're not alone Diane ,check the comments with this tweet .I'm staying out of it :)

Summer 2023, Sarah Fergusson diagnosed with breast cancer. January 2024, now she's diagnosed with skin cancer also.

February 2024, Charles diagnosed with cancer.

March 2024, now this.

The world is a stage. And we're all being played for fools on it. Again.

The weekend is looking good for some fishing and hillwalking. Now that's some proper news and time well spent.

Who the hell is Sarah Ferguson, and why did even bother to ask?

If she has cancer who cares?

There are people dying in UKrain and Gaza in horrible ways, why not focus on that instead some royal Sarah Ferguson

Thumb-ran this page, because all posts are good.

To Rawhide68, I think you are missing the several important reasons that this is garnering so much attention.

1. This involves geopolitics, where individuals are kind of key. Like does this situation relate to how the next UK Royal Family will turn out.

2. The vid has drawn comments above questioning the truth of Kate’s vid, asking if it is actually proper video of her. Good question, as both masks and vid-tampering/fakes are both possible now. Considering point 1., this deserves scrutiny IMO.

3. AFAIK, Christ said that an antagonism to any weak and/or small creature is the same to ‘him’. IMO, meant all life is valued equal. Doesn’t rate distain, just because it’s a Royal.

Myself, if that vid is true, I think she is saying goodby. I’ve watched a bunch of YouTube Dr. G’s body language analyses.

Some interesting comments on Angirfan about the video being AI-generated, I don't believe the 'illuminati sacrifice' stuff but make of it what you will. Whilst I was watching it I noticed that there was no movement in the foliage in the background; early spring here and as per usual, it's always quite windy. Source

"VIDEO SKEPTICS

Alarming_League_2035:

“Her facial mole has gone. The video quality itself is appalling …”

Educational-Help-126:

“… This is absolutely a deep fake. The background was foggy. There was a weird film around her head … [The] background is similar to the edited photograph of her and her kids …”

BeNotConformed33:

“… I can’t help noticing about the background … that it seemingly doesn’t move. No slight breeze to move the trees or birds flying away to make a branch move …”

dinosaurninja:

“… [There] are audible glitches in her voice in the last minute of the video … And her lips go back to the same position all the time in a weird way …”

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/..._fake/?sort=ne


llifthrasir commented

Well the announcement many have been waiting for just aired. Looks very much like Kate.

Only the real Kate would never sit with her legs crossed. A etiquette so strong it is unlikely she would do different when in private.

Then there are the eyelids. In my opinion clearly showing cicatrices of eyelid surgery or plastic surgery to look like Kate.

All this time the message It was not cancer. Then now we finally get to hear it is cancer. No logic there. Just trying to repair the PR damage of the last few months.

I still have in my mind that Kate was sacrificed in an Illuminati ritual. And am wondering why an ambulance was at Sandringham on the 28 th of December. Kate last seen on the 27th of december. No picture or her entering the hospital nor of her leaving the hospital. This evening i was waiting for a vid on Youtube to air how they are making clones.

Too many people looking off, not their former selves. Biden with his tight to the skull right earlobe f.i. Hilary Clinton. Bill Gates on Google Images, not looking like one and the same person. Stalin's grandson claims Putin has been dead for years or hiding in a bunker, very ill. Again not looking like his former self. Our dutch PM Rutte had a socalled makeover looking from teenager with acne all of a sudden a very different man when he was voted in power, after deceiving the other candidate. Clearly a WEFFY."

To further add to whether the video clip is AI :

Attachment 52844


From:
https://x.com/UnityNewsNet/status/17...187755385?s=20

I personally believe we the public are being played and the ramifications of this ongoing story will be used to the detriment to our freedom of speech.

The video was taken by BBC studios which is state owned.

yahoo

Quote:

---

Kensington Palace said the video message was filmed by BBC Studios in Windsor on Wednesday. Following its release, King Charles, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and others shared messages of support wishing Kate well and praising her courage.

---

wiki

Quote:

---

The BBC is a state owned public broadcasting company and operates under a royal charter. The charter is the constitutional basis for the BBC, and sets out the BBC's Object, Mission and Public Purposes.

---

07/21/16 (2:00)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WWZmT_k1uxg

Quote:

---

Wag the Dog is a 1997 American political comedy-drama film produced and directed by Barry Levinson and starring Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro. The screenplay centres on a spin doctor and a Hollywood producer who fabricate a war in Albania to distract voters from a presidential sex scandal.

---

Why all the cancer issues from the royal information machine. Is it all true or not ?

Applying my most 'conspiratorial' mind to it as a thought exercise, as I always do, before I go for simple straight conclusions ( sorry, but that's the way I've evolved to be, [ you're not paranoid, they really are out to get you - Prime minister John Major, 1 month after replacing Margaret Thatcher ] )

. . . I'll offer three ways to go with it.

1) The people in the know at the top of the 'establishment', knowing the covid phase one operation has been outed in the public consciousness have decided the resulting cancer carnage is going to be very easily connected to the injections so have decided they need to provide royal air-cover for the carnage about to become the boiling pot that cooks the long standing social contract their security depends on.

2) The (royal)family themselves feel dumped by the group running the current global power grab operation (NWO), having been given a raw deal they are furious about and want to get a movement going to fight back with the people behind them.

3) The ultimate Hegelian Dialectic scenario play by Satan himself. Threaten the people of the world with a horrific dystopian future including using comically bond villain figure heads to max out the scare, then send in the second ( false light) team to oust the "bad guys" and bring in the regime of the Prince of Peace. Keep in mind, in this scenario, that Satan's end game ultimate agenda ( using and abusing anybody and everybody all the way) is to "dethrone God and replace him". That will obviously require some hefty moves with "light and love" at some point.


Or, I could just take it all at face value, go down the pub ( that I dare not enter these days ), chink glasses and toast the King.

Or, I could just take it all at face value, go down the pub ( that I dare not enter these days ), chink glasses and toast the King
Or, a toast via Spooner? A daft aside…

Spooner…
Toasting Queen Victoria at dinner, Spooner said, "Give three cheers for our queer old dean," and he greeted a group of farmers as "noble tons of soil." There was the time he cautioned young missionaries against having "a half-warmed fish in their hearts." He described Cambridge in the winter as "a bloody meek place."
Daft times afore now… look for even more stupidity!!!

I don't believe for a moment that she had anything other than a placebo (unless someone out there really has malice towards her), but could these be connected, or expected to be connected in the minds of the people?

A perpetual continuation of the notion that the video is completely a 'DeepFake' will introduce a new era where no photographic/audio/video evidence released as 'dirt' on the crooks who run the world will get them convicted.

That can be in the absolute sense and as a message to minions in the system who are blackmailed by such material that "we've got your back, those godly folks can't touch you even if they raid the vaults where the blackmail material is stored".

Just jotting a thought note.