Trump's Executive Order on Social Media Censorship
Printable View
Trump's Executive Order on Social Media Censorship
Trump Launches NUCLEAR Option Over Social Media Censorship Of Conservatives, Targets Section 230
Trump signs executive order regarding social media
Trump mentions:
Section 230
Monopoly in communication
Changes in legislation
and perhaps lawsuits
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sectio...ns_Decency_Act
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
Here's the leaked Executive Order. (I've not yet checked if this is identical to the one just signed.)
~~~
https://newstarget.com/Files/EO-Prev...Censorship.pdf
Leaked . . . ?
I don't like the the orange clown that feels the need to do solarium 24/7 a bit, but he's certainly spicying things up, particularly if he stays true to what he answered in the last question. The question was about what he thinks regarding the china-us trade deal, but he instead replied by implying that he'll officialy accuse china for the covid1984 spread worldwide. Tomorrow!!!Quote:
Posted by ExomatrixTV
Stefan Molyneux Title of The Video was made couple hours BEFORE it was "official" ... I think he changed the title but NOT the Thumbnail Preview Picture.Quote:
Posted by norman
And all Trump haters who love to misrepresent him 24/7 ... is not my worry as I am not responsible for their quality of thinking that is their Karma. Those who (blindly) believe copied lies & smears are hopeless anyway. As I am Dutch am beyond Deep State Republicrats & Deep State Demopublcians ... I supported Ron Paul for a long long time even before he was Republican ... Being Libertarian is his true passion.
This did happen last year, and if the draft EO passes as written, it looks like it will reopen again.
There's been many mentions of IBOR (Internet Bill of Rights) by Q. It's probably a healthy discussion to have, the idea and concept of an Internet Bill of Rights.Quote:
In May of 2019, the White House Office of Digital Strategy created a Tech Bias Reporting tool to allow Americans to report incidents of online censorship. In just weeks, the White House received over 16,000 complaints of online platforms censoring or otherwise taking action against users based on their political viewpoints. The White House Office of Digital Strategy shall reestablish the White House Tech Bias Reporting Tool to collect complaints of online censorship and other potentially unfair or deceptive acts or practices by online platforms and shall submit complaints received to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
Should such a thing exist?
If so, what ought to be included in it, excluded from it?
Who would be the governing body?
How would it be applied?
Could IBOR even be enforced?
Would IBOR bring balance to an out-of-balance situation?
...
It'll be interesting to see if this idea starts to come more and more to the forefront of public conversation?
While many media are presenting today's actions by President Trump as a reaction to the recent Twitter fact-check. It seems to me that this has been in works for at least a year, probably longer?
I saw this "leaked" document release almost simultaneously across many social media platforms earlier today?Quote:
Posted by norman
Maybe it went super-viral, very fast.
I think this is a topic many people care about, and most have felt affected by.
Social Media Companies PANICKING Over Trump Executive Order And Its Hilarious:
¤=[Post Update]=¤
Quote:
Posted by edinaI saw this "leaked" document release almost simultaneously across many social media platforms earlier today?Quote:
Posted by norman
Maybe it went super-viral, very fast.
I think this is a topic many people care about, and most have felt affected by.
Stefan Molyneux Title of The Video was made couple hours BEFORE it was "official" ... I think he changed the title but NOT the Thumbnail Preview Picture.
'The Five' spar over Trump's social media 'crackdown'
Is Facebook censoring conservative voices? Zuckerberg weighs in
Yes, it was made available to, it seems, select individuals - one example below:Quote:
Posted by norman
I have to say, this has made my day.
That is all.
As long as the maths are not in favor of the people who would call this tyranny, it makes mine too.Quote:
Posted by Ben Macdonald
But, let's not be media political. The situation is more vast of mind and human soul than that.
We are not a bunch of "media" union hacks sticking up for something the union stands for. Oh yea, free speech etc, Assange was never a cabal asset etc.
Keep it real, and keep it focused on what's going to get us out of this. The truth and the true energy. There is nothing retrospectively wise or academic about stepping forwards. It takes a simple faith. It's for others, at their leasure, to write it all up as the entertainment bollox some might still want to consume.
Oh, damn, I mentioned Assange's origins, bet I never see a thanks from Tintin ;)
Fair point Norman,
but do you think Assange being tortured is a lie to decieve us?
I don't get your reference there.
On Assange, that's fairly simple. He only flipped late in the game when he'd been left out to rot.Quote:
Posted by Ben Macdonald
I'm sure Trump and the team wish him well though. His biggest problem is himself, he's still programmed to talk the underdog talk they put into him as a kid.
Jeeze, Julian, get off the political correctness, put your hand on your heart, and join the great awakening. We love you, but stop it with the bollox.
Extradition out of the uk is a GOOD thing, for crisakes, what's his problem.
At the end of the day, until I really feel a different energy signature from Assange and his string of Rothschild lawyers, I really dont trust the guy to not be a total sh*t at the wrong moment. I doubt Trump feels any different.
There ya go folks, that's probaby me booted out of avalon.
He is Being tortured though.
Read Craig murray's blog, and you'll get real insight into just how bad it is.
Murray is currently under threat of jail time, because he had the temerity to document, and stand up for Alex Salmond, the face of real Scotttish independence.
The establishment is raging due to Salmond being found not guuilty of all charges of sexual misconduct (by a jury including 9 women from anti independence Edinburgh), so they have decided to go after Murray, as a face saving excercise.
I've chatted to Murray, who also has been denied access to his friend Assange, as have his lawyers, and what he has to say about his treatment is, qiute frankly, heartbreaking.
At the start of the opening of his trial, he couldn't even recall his place of birth, or his date of birth.
The implications of Assange's treatment, for all of us, are clear to see.
I respect your viewpoint though.
Tortured for what ! ?
His confusion about what side he's on ? ffs man, if he doesn't know now he's rotten to the core. Trump asked him politely to join the good side. he said f^ck off.
After that, what I am or anyone to think ?.
HAHA, I see the thanks have all dried up. hahahaha
I guess we're at the point where the cematorium says bless this soul :)
Nope. It's just that this thread started of reporting on some very important development on the US political chessboard and it somehow ended up being about J.Assange.Quote:
Posted by norman
Perhaps if you take it to the appropriate thread you might have better luck. With a quick search I could find 96 threads about assange.
Thanks for the guided cop out.Quote:
Posted by fractal beingNope. It's just that this thread started of reporting on some very important development on the US political chessboard and it somehow ended up being about J.Assange.Quote:
Posted by norman
Perhaps if you take it to the appropriate thread you might have better luck. With a quick search I could find 96 threads about assange.
Ten years ago I would have kissed you all over for it.
Hah, those were the days.
I'm so tired, tired, tired of this tiny loop. Thank god it's only cyber, or I really would blow my biological brains out.
As long as it’s going to be “run by humans”, internet will be imperfect. Take an example of going to a computerised library, trying to find a book in the catalogue.
Suppose there is human librarian behind the computer and suppose you make a mistake or spell the name wrong or have a bad day or the librarian does, the book may never be found.
( no offence to librarians 🙏 it’s but an example, they’re generally the calmest and most helpful people around).
Computer intelligence can be advanced enough to the point of being able to “read you”, no matter where do you come from, what language or dialect do you communicate in, the way you place words in the sentence or what kind of metaphors do you use. It won’t bully you, criticise you or refute your request unless: suppose it figures out your intentions are purely malicious and destructive.
Secondly it is there to “help you” in the same way any computerised library service does.
It can help you to specify your question or correct the terminology, navigate you to the right information, the best possible calculable solution( that is very important feature because very few humans if anyone has full access to all global information at once but the computer does) or navigate you to the human group and likeminded individuals you are probably looking for.
It won’t engage you in “human opinion” and bully you for your input. As individual human beings, some try to “play God” but we actually don’t have such a “global capacity”.
Human run internet is dangerous for allowing emotional humans with prejudice trying to censor other emotional humans with prejudice, often by taking them from the correct pathway of what they’re looking for to some kind of “chat room” where they can get “talked to”.
Humans running and censoring “global internet” by army of computer engineers really is not how internet should look like.
It should also grant the same rights and privileges to all, no matter who is accessing, except for sensitive information but then again, the AI can possibly read our true intents better than a human does in most casual circumstances.
🌟
Today’s internet engages and sucks in pathological human thinking the same way as the Matrix in the movie did.
You may have good luck and happen upon good friends out there, for sure but many people come to “ask about aubergines” and end up seduced to chat room full of political discussion, for example, leaving them knackered at the end of the day and accused of opinion at the expense of some mean bully on the other side.
Sounds exaggerated here on the PA forum of course but consider the “rest of the internet” is much bigger than the PA forum.
How many kids and people of all ages who are new to it end up in traps and loops of social media, pestered by advertisements of trade giants or worse, the most innocent ones trapped by one of the psychopaths and misused.
Somehow, I do agree with Mr Trump that the internet needs to be “purified” .
Free speech should not be “pathological human behaviour” and a madhouse.
the draft was released....Quote:
Posted by ExomatrixTVSocial Media Companies PANICKING Over Trump Executive Order And Its Hilarious:
¤=[Post Update]=¤
Quote:
Posted by edinaI saw this "leaked" document release almost simultaneously across many social media platforms earlier today?Quote:
Posted by norman
Maybe it went super-viral, very fast.
I think this is a topic many people care about, and most have felt affected by.
Stefan Molyneux Title of The Video was made couple hours BEFORE it was "official" ... I think he changed the title but NOT the Thumbnail Preview Picture.
it was not leaked.
Wow, did I read this right, or....
Too busy today to read this today, I need to focus on placing a little concrete.
https://crazzfiles.com/wp-content/up...ll-Destroy.jpg
https://crazzfiles.com/anatomy-of-pr...-action-items/
Quote:
Anatomy of President Trump’s executive order to end political bias by the tech giants and challenge Sec. 230 (plus 10 urgent action items)
The Crazz FilesMay 29, 2020
Thread Yesterday: Trump's Executive Order on Social Media Censorship
Kayleigh McEnany holds White House press briefing | 5/28/2020
I wasn’t too sure where to post this item. The mods may decide on this topic. Although it was suggested to have a new thread on Assange which may be the case. However, as this part of the topic is still current it may address what Norman has stated.
Norman, although you have made some interesting statements there appears to be supporting evidence. Back in 2017 there were two episodes from Richplanet into investigations of Assange and Wikileaks.
Wikileaks : Made by the N.S.A.
Richard Hall and Andrew Johnson drill down in their investigations of who is really Assange and Wikileaks. They show documented evidence and much more other material linked to a network that supports there claims.
This episode of 15-07-2017 is about 2 hours spit into 4 parts
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_gue...art=1&person=1
In conspiracy circles Wikileaks generates much excitement. But not at Richplanet. Whenever you hear the words "Assange" or "Wikileaks" in relation to some new "leak", there are the questions you ought to be asking yourself : What is the ulterior motive for this leak and am I being taken for a ride here? In today's programme, for the first time anywhere I reveal just how much of a handled entity Julian Assange is. Assange is not an independent activist, but is chauffeured around by establishment handlers. He is not a wanted criminal, he is not being given asylum, he is not a whistleblower, he is not an advocate of freedom of information. He is an intelligence created tool being used to front one of the biggest psy-ops currently in operation on this planet. Wikileaks is funded and supported by globalists who are using it for a number of agendas.
The Protocols of Zion
This episode of 21-10-2017 is an update from the first part.
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_gue...art=1&person=1
In the first part we further discuss Wikileaks and Julian Assange. After receiving considerable feedback from show no. 240, we decided to do an update. It seems fairly unanimous to those with a critically thinking brain that Julian Assange is a fraud. All the clues are there that he is a puppet of U.S. intelligence masquerading as a champion of truth, and subtly propped up by mainstream media with their fake cynicism. I am sure there will be more evidence brought to light in future to make Julian Assange a bigger laughing stock than he already is.
Every vindication (and there are plenty) is another nail in the coffin called: "fact checkers" ... Time for: tinyurl.com/HypocrisyCheckers
Even Mark Zuckerberg Thinks Jack Dorsey "Fact Checking" Trumps Twitter is Nuts:
Twitter Grandstands on Trump Tweet, Falsely Claims He is Glorifying Violence:
IT'S ON NOW!
Wyden speaks to importance of CDA 230 at Senate Commerce hearing:
Senator Cruz Questions Mark Zuckerberg on Alleged Political Bias at Facebook (Discussing CDA 230).
Killing CDA 230 Would Kill the Internet:
Section 230 Communications Decency Act. Why it needs to be changed:
Inside Trump's Executive Order Against Big Tech Censorship:
Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Uuw3d92u0fko
source
Republican DEMANDS Criminal investigation Into Twitter, I Warned You And Now Its Coming:
The censorship is not just aimed at ''right wing'' people / issues....extends basically to anyone against status quo, MSM narrative whatever it is..including anti empire, anti war folks. See what Google did to Tulsi Gabbard during /after her debates saw interest in her jump up.
Generally, I am against censorship and if google was responsible for messing with Tulsi Gabbord, for example, that is so wrong. But twitter simply suggesting fact checking and limiting what might incite violence, I think is okay.
Facebook allowing it's echo chambers to go unchecked was said to be responsible for the Rohingya crisis in Myanmar a few years back. And before social media was social media, radio broadcasts encouraging Hutus to take up arms against the Tutsis in Rwanda was considered the major triggering event that touched off a genocide. Ditto newspapers, radio broadcasts in Germany ramping up to war that scapegoated Jews and created atrocity propaganda.
It's very important to encourage free speech through whatever means while limiting its potential for causing mob violence, particularly against vulnerable minorities.
Freedom and free speech are concepts fraught with paradoxes and ambiguity, contained within constantly shifting sets of social and civil dynamics.
Quote:
Posted by AutumnW
Right on, but how is peaceful speech differentiated from
-inciting violence?
-inciting hate crimes?
-inciting psychosis?
Only where psychology has been highjacked by drug pushers,
free speech looks like evidence of covid infections.