-
Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
I'm not sure if this subject may have been covered already, but it is a worry I (and I'm sure others) have, as people around me have had/are having the jab (incidentally, I often feel as if I have failed them, but there is only so much you can do with little energy, when you're up against the tide of people's workplaces demanding it, their trust in 'science' and authorities, and the unrelenting propaganda).
Anyway, whatever cocktail is put into them, or whatever is created by their bodies as a result of that, I really do not want any bit of it to somehow be passed on to me, and I wonder if there is any evidence so far of such a risk with these particular 'vaccines'. Hopefully my worry is completely unfounded.
(Editing to add that I hope that doesn't make me seem selfish...)
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
I have been wondering about this.
I guess researching how gmo crops interact with natural crops would provide some perspective...
I certainly wouldnt swap any bodily fluids with injected people until further notice. (I guess thats quite a statement to make.....)
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Quote:
Posted by
meat suit
...I certainly wouldnt swap any bodily fluids with injected people until further notice. (I guess thats quite a statement to make.....)
A sensible statement though! Won't be sharing a glass of water etc. ;-)
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
I can imagine how stressful it may feel nowadays in the families and communities concerned but look at it from any other perspective than “Covid 19 jab”.
Yes we do share some of our microbiome and even snippets of DNA in households and closed working spaces and other crowded spaces if frequently visited. Most of the biological share is “read and discarded” as our immunity system operates down to molecular level. If it’s damaged or partially hijacked -long term- we may become a cohost to other people’s bio-information. Microbial and viral cross-contamination depends more on whether we eat the same types of food and breathe the same air.
But at the bottom line, if there’s microbe in the environment that is as aggressive as Covid 19, it requires lots of cautions to avoid it.
In case of vaccinations on the other hand, there is no viral action in place. Vaccinated people (and dogs :) ) tend to look and feel little weak for few days but then they get back on feet as usually.
So I’d not worry about it but try to be kind and watchful with friends/colleagues who have been vaccinated as they may need your help instead.
I’ve been vaccinated against good number of things in my childhood as all children were ( it was mandatory and free of any cost back then, vaccinations against TBC, polio, measles etc.) and I don’t think I could have “passed on my immunity” on other people in the world other than psychologically.
If we could do “just that” it would be kind of easy.
One thing about it ...it’s long enough from my perspective that I’d wash most of my metabolism out since and got rid of all I ever wanted to get rid off,
together with biological residues of my parents etc.
I did thorough cleansing of body and mind, repeatedly since I was 19 and felt better ever since.
🙏
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Thank you ever so much for your interesting and thoughtful reply. Yes, kind and watchful is what I am hoping to be to those I love, which is why I felt compelled to caution them. Though I tried to be diplomatic about it, it was not appreciated very much, and the next thing I know I'm a potential fear monger.
Of course I fully respect everyone's freedom to do what they believe to be best; after all, this virus is not one to be taken too lightly either (in my Dad's care home in the Netherlands, 17 out of 38 residents died last Spring when there was an outbreak, including both of his nextdoor neighbours), and ultimately, what do I really know?
(Personally though, I will not touch this concoction with a barge pole. If/When I die, it will not be to please the likes of Mr Gates.)
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
It's really quite a good question. :highfive:
It doesn't seem 100.00% impossible that something unhealthy and unwanted, present in the blood or elsewhere, could be passed on through bodily fluids (sexual contact, as with HIV), or blood transfer, as when someone has an open wound or even a blood transfusion. I'd be very interested to know if anything like this has been discussed in the medical community.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Quote:
Posted by
Bill Ryan
It's really quite a good question. :highfive:
It doesn't seem 100.00% impossible that something unhealthy and unwanted, present in the blood or elsewhere, could be passed on through bodily fluids (sexual contact, as with HIV), or accidental blood transfer, as when someone has an open wound. I'd be very interested to know if anything like this has been discussed in the medical community.
this is HIGHLY dependent on the specific methodology used by the vaccine in question... these new mRNA editing covid vaccines function (and have side effects) completely different from the traditional "flu" vaccine (which was an attenuated or "weakened" virus that allowed your immune system to beat it easily).
this doesn't seem to be spoken of much... but mRNA literally reprograms your body... that's it's purpose.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Thank you, Bill. I did wonder about blood transfusions as well, glad you mentioned that!
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Exactly! And apparently it should never have been classed as a 'vaccine' because of that. And it is because of this gene altering nature that I'm not entirely confident that boosting the immune system alone is going to be sufficient if traces of this stuff somehow end up being transferred.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
I googled the question. Do vaccines have a shedding period ? (I know the flue vaccine has a shedding period)
https://www.verywellhealth.com/live-...edding-2633700
Understanding Live Vaccines and Vaccine Shedding
Vaccines stimulate your body to produce immunity against a disease. Some use live viruses while others use inactive or killed viruses or bacteria. For some diseases, both versions are available and each is recommended for a different population, such as those who are immunocompromised.
You may have questions as to whether you would be contagious for the disease after getting a live vaccine due to viral shedding. Live vaccines are safe, with some precautions, especially when compared with the risk of getting the disease itself and spreading it to others.
Live vs. Inactivated Vaccines
Live vaccines contain a weakened or attenuated form of a virus or bacteria. This is, in contrast, to "killed" or inactivated vaccines.
It might sound frightening at first to realize that a vaccine contains a weakened virus or bacteria, but these are altered so that they cannot cause disease—at least in people with healthy immune systems, and the majority of people without a healthy immune system as well.
If a child (or adult) has a suppressed immune system, live vaccines are not given
A potential problem is with shedding of the virus by those appropriately immunized who may have close contact with those who are immunosuppressed. After receiving the vaccine, some of the weakened viruses will travel through the body and can be present in bodily secretions such as feces.2
The other main type of vaccine is made of the inactivated virus or bacteria (whole vaccine) or just parts of the virus or bacteria (fractional vaccine).
Advantages and Benefits
Live vaccines are thought to better simulate natural infections and usually provide lifelong protection with one or two doses.3 Most inactivated vaccines, in contrast, require multiple primary doses and boosters (years later) to get the same type of immunity.
In some types of live vaccines, a second dose is given because some people don't respond to the first dose, but that is not considered to be a booster.
Live Vaccines
Children have been getting live vaccines for many years, and these vaccines are considered to be very safe for those who are healthy. In fact, one of the very first vaccines, the smallpox vaccine, was a live-virus vaccine.
Due to widespread vaccination, the last natural case of smallpox occurred in 1977 (there was a case due to a laboratory accident in 1978) and the disease was declared to be eradicated worldwide in 1979.
Examples of Live Vaccines
Live vaccines include:4
MMR: The combination measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine
Vavivax: The varicella or chicken pox vaccine
Proquad: A combination of MMR and Varivax
RotaTeq and Rotarix: Rotavirus vaccines
Flumist: The nasal spray flu vaccine (the flu shot is an inactivated vaccine)
Yellow fever vaccine: An attenuated, live virus vaccine recommended for travelers to high-risk areas
Adenovirus vaccine: A live-virus vaccine that protects against type 4 and type 7 adenovirus, approved only for military personnel
Typhoid vaccine: The oral typhoid vaccine is made with a live-attenuated strain of Salmonella typhi, the bacteria which causes typhoid fever. An inactivated, injectable version of the vaccine is also available. Either typhoid vaccine would only be given to travelers to high-risk areas.
BCG: The bacilli Calmette-Guerin tuberculosis vaccine is not routinely used in the United States because it mainly prevents severe TB, a disease uncommon in the United States.
Smallpox vaccine: Not routinely used since 1972, but is available from stockpiles if it is needed
Oral polio vaccine (OPV): The original OPV (Sabin vaccine) was a live vaccine and has been replaced in the United States by the inactivated polio vaccine (Salk vaccine). Prior to using the injectable polio vaccine, there were a few cases of polio each year in the United States felt to be due to the vaccine.
The live virus vaccines that are used routinely include the MMR, Varivax, Rotavirus, and Flumist (the injectable flu shot is preferred for those who are high risk).
Contraindications
Although live vaccines don't cause disease because they are made with weakened viruses and bacteria, there is always a concern that someone with a severely weakened immune system could get sick after getting one. That is why live vaccines are not given to people getting chemotherapy or who have severe HIV, among other conditions.2
Whether or not you give a live vaccine to someone with an immune system problem depends greatly on exactly what condition they have and the degree of their immunosuppression. For example, it is now recommended that children with HIV get the MMR, Varivax, and rotavirus vaccines, depending on their CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts.
Vaccine Shedding
Parents sometimes have a concern about whether their healthy children should get live vaccines if they will be exposed to someone else who has a problem with their immune system, especially if they are in close contact with someone that has compromised immunity.
Except for OPV and smallpox (which aren't typically used), children who live with someone who has an immune deficiency can and should get most vaccines in the childhood immunization schedule (MMR, Varivax, and the rotavirus vaccines). It would be extremely rare for someone to contract one of these viruses from someone who got the vaccine.
A much greater concern than live vaccine shedding of a weakened strain would be that the unvaccinated child might get a natural infection with measles or chickenpox and pass that on to a person with an immune system problem.
Read more here.
https://www.verywellhealth.com/live-...edding-2633700
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Of course there is shedding, that is the whole idea of the shot.
It alters the DNA and tricks the cells into producing antibodies against the spike protein on the virus cell wall. Some of those antibodies end up being shed during normal breathing.
But the gene altering concoction shot into the arm does not shed because it cannot survive in ambient temperatures and has no route out of the body before being taken up by the recipient's system.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Thank you so much for this article on the traditional vaccine types. It is useful to have this context here, in order to see in what ways this modern mRNA method compares and differs.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
That is a very thought-provoking reply; thank you ever so much for that!
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Probably a question for a virologist, microbiologist or someone who has spent years developing vaccines. Perhaps we have someone qualified of the forum to give us some informed facts.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
I recall that this was discussed by a medical professional in one of the many videos that have been posted here in Avalon on the subject in the past year. I do not recall exactly which part of the vaccine they were speaking about, but they were regarding it with some concern.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
That really would be fantastic. There are so many different types of scenarios possible, ranging from things like sharing bathroom facilities, to blood transfusions and organ donations in quite a different league.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Oh, that is interesting. I've not been able to do quite as much research as I would have liked to so far, but that is a good starting point, thank you!
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Nick. That's the problem in so many disciplines these days. The experts cannot be trusted and because you can always find an 'expert' who supports your own views. There is no consensus on anything nowadays.
Everything is about profit, and keeping the share holders happy. Truth is whatever makes the most money. In an environment like that nothing is certain.
Watch how I cannot even talk about 'medicine' without using their appropriated words. Or 'health care'. We don have health care, we have sick care - totally different thing entirely. And how is medicine synonymous with health? Medicine is drugs, which you take when you are sick not when you are healthy...
It is the same with so many areas of study. Words have been twisted to mean something other than its intended meaning. So you have 'free' energy, because the most important aspect of energy is not how efficient it is but how much it costs - how much profit it represents.
The other aspect of this is how those in seats of authority in various disciplines use sophistication to obscure the fact that there is very little they actually know, and to hide the fact that much of their work relies on very many untested assumptions - the testing of which would throw them out of business due to the number of assumptions that would be proven false.
This is especially true in virology and vaccinations.
Like much of the modern world, its priorities are those things which are expedient and which can generate instant profit.
There was a time when truth was a coveted prize, and our higher learning centers were involved in that pursuit. Now they just spew propaganda and radicalize our children.
The truth has been reduced to whatever authorities tell us it is. But even they are torn about what that truth should be...
That is why it is best to arm oneself with one's own truth, well researched and vetted, and subject to change. It is just as valid as that of the 'authorities'. Often times it is far far better.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Quote:
Posted by
Ernie Nemeth
Nick. That's the problem in so many disciplines these days. The experts cannot be trusted and because you can always find an 'expert' who supports your own views. There is no consensus on anything nowadays.
Everything is about profit, and keeping the share holders happy. Truth is whatever makes the most money. In an environment like that nothing is certain.
Watch how I cannot even talk about 'medicine' without using their appropriated words. Or 'health care'. We don have health care, we have sick care - totally different thing entirely. And how is medicine synonymous with health? Medicine is drugs, which you take when you are sick not when you are healthy...
It is the same with so many areas of study. Words have been twisted to mean something other than its intended meaning. So you have 'free' energy, because the most important aspect of energy is not how efficient it is but how much it costs - how much profit it represents.
The other aspect of this is how those in seats of authority in various disciplines use sophistication to obscure the fact that there is very little they actually know, and to hide the fact that much of their work relies on very many untested assumptions - the testing of which would throw them out of business due to the number of assumptions that would be proven false.
This is especially true in virology and vaccinations.
Like much of the modern world, its priorities are those things which are expedient and which can generate instant profit.
There was a time when truth was a coveted prize, and our higher learning centers were involved in that pursuit. Now they just spew propaganda and radicalize our children.
The truth has been reduced to whatever authorities tell us it is. But even they are torn about what that truth should be...
That is why it is best to arm oneself with one's own truth, well researched and vetted, and subject to change. It is just as valid as that of the 'authorities'. Often times it is far far better.
Coming from an engineering background I can assure you that there are plenty of experts that can be trusted. I don't see why my branch of science should be different to any other.
If everyone arms themselves in their "own truth", and the is no consensus, society collapses. There are recent examples of what that can lead to that cannot be overlooked.
Unlike some people, I don't see a conspiracy up every lamp post. Just maybe one in 100!
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Tech advances are not subject to false claims in the same way as medical claims are, for example. A tech gadget has to work, you can't lie about that. But you can lie about a gene therapy by using a false positive testing regime that can be and is dialed up and down as required to advance the agenda.
In science, what can be manipulated is the direction in which science advances. If it is an area of interest, money is thrown at it. If it is an area that is being kept occulted, it will be defunded, debunked, and defamed. One such area, and one of your favorites, is weather modification. All countries are doing it but no country will admit to it publicly. It can be argued whether they are spraying but word is leaking out how, for instance, China has been using modification techniques for decades.
The reason knowledge is actively managed is because of money. Follow the money and you quickly find the culprits, the likely perpetrators. It always comes back to 'follow the money'.
And in our world the money leads to Central banks and the Fed. From there it branches out to the protectors of that money: Wall Street, multi-national corporations, Big Tech, Big Pharma, globalists, the CCP, and the UN.
We need to closely examine these edifices, these monopoly players, to see if they are following the science or if they are following an agenda that might not be in the best interest of the common man, or woman.
I am convinced that if such an effort were to be mounted it would quickly become evident that much of our endeavors have been high-jacked to line the pockets of our masters.
Central banks impose great hardships on all debtor nations. Wall Street inflates its assets and controls the price of commodities. Corporations cater to their investors at the expense of the population at large. Big Tech gives us gadgets we don't need. Big Pharma siphons massive amounts of public money into a few dead end campaigns for a handful of ailments, virtually ignoring anything else: heart disease, artificial limbs and joints, transplants, and cancer. Globalists steer us towards removal of national borders, color revolutions, centralized control of everything, and the homogeneously androgynous future of the human race. The CCP sends out millions of spies to infiltrate every nation and every corporation for its own nefarious ends. And the UN attempts to circumvent the authority of sovereign nations.
If we were to unpack the actual priorities of these institutions we would discover that none of them have our best interests at heart and that none of them have been furthering the causes they publicly claim to advance.
We have been duped. Private, for profit, institutions always have vested interests that do not align with the public good - ever! We would be well advised to set up investigations into all these areas of public concern. Those in power must be toppled and those that have been marginalized by those individuals must be brought to the fore to be heard. They are the ones with the actual advances for the good of humanity but they have been silenced.
I could go on but I think the main gist has been addressed.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
To highlight the above:
January 26/21
Canada - pop. 37,742,154
to date:
753,011 cases
19,238 deaths
If we drill down on just these three numbers and assuming the data as year one totals...
% of population so far infected: 1.9
% of population so far died: .05
% of infected so far died: 2.5
These numbers do not take a genius to understand, nor does it take a 'health care professional' or 'official authority' to annalyse it.
Using the predictive models from the beginning of the epidemic we can see that in fact even those numbers were over-estimated. The most reliable numbers I saw were : 15% infection rate and .04% deaths.
If you look at the numbers for Canada the infection rate so far is only 2.5% and deaths are a bit higher than predicted at .05%. The deaths can be explained if they begin tapering off now in year two, as it seems they are. The bug has taken most of the susceptible in year one and should drop and flatten out at around 04%.
What I can see is the infection rate is off. That could mean the lock downs are working, more people are self-isolating, some may have taken preventative measures, they may have been luckily avoiding the clouds of virulent droplets floating around everywhere, and/or more people are unaffected by this disease than originally estimated.
Another inference that can be made based on the data is that 2.5% of the infected dying seems too high for such a weak bug. I wonder what protocols they are using in Canada? No idea, but I would bet it is not the most effective as Canada follows WHO directives. Does that include HCQ or Ivermectin or Regeneron or high dose vitamin therapy?
Just how long do they think it will take for the entire population to be infected? And do they think that 37,000,000 people will catch it?
If we take Canada's numbers we should expect to have around 5,500,000 cases. If after a year there has only been 753,000 cases do they think it will take another 7 years to spread through the population?
My speculation, now, apart from the facts but loosely based on them, and based on other flu seasons:
I think this bug has already made its rounds and infected those with weak immune systems and left the rest of us alone.
But even if I am wrong, year two must certainly see the spread of this bug to everyone on the planet, and as far as a time line estimate that's being generous.
Tentative conclusion: There is no need for a vaccine and certainly not for an experimental gene altering injection. The risk outweighs any expected benefit.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
NURSE WARNS - STAY AWAY FROM VAXXED PEOPLE
Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/uNpRqMROrZQB
Sounds like the Walking Dead
More warnings:
http://www.truthunmasked.org/p/stay-away.html
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Quote:
Posted by
uzn
CDC's Zombie Apocalypse.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Hello folks,
A friend of my passed this onto me earlier today. Apparently there are now cases of folks who have taken the vaccine coming into contact with people who have not taken the vaccine...and "shedding" such that there seems to be some sort of effect given to the unvaxxed person...and also affecting animals (vaxxed person petting a animal and the animal dying shortly thereafter).
I highly recommend watching this video of a nurse explaining it. Runs 8 minutes and has valuable info, imo. Could save you or your pet's life.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=cmSx30WoA4E
Dave - Toronto
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Wondering what is happening with Lawrence Palevsky. Is the treatment shedding and causing symptoms for those who did not get it?
And Christiane Northrup talks at 26:30 about the changes in menstrual cycles of untreated women
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Quote:
Posted by
Satori
Quote:
Posted by
uzn
CDC's Zombie Apocalypse.
This is concerning 😳
I guess if they can’t get us one way they’ll try get us another way...
Staying away from the jabbed is nigh impossible.
I’d asked a close relative to let me know when she has had her 2nd jab as I was concerned about the shedding.
She turned up yesterday and half an hour into her visit, with my puppy on her knee and one of my children sat next to her, admits she’s had the jab late on last week.
After respecting her wishes to keep a distance as she isolated countless times this last year, I was astounded by the lack of respect for my wishes now she feels she is safe.
I refuse to wear a mask and want to carry on with life as best I can with no fear, but equally don’t want to be taking part in no science experiment.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Dave, many thanks for this thread. :thumbsup: For those interested in learning more about this (and it may well be important), if you search for shedding as a keyword, you'll see there are already a number of posts about this spread over quite a few different thread topics. As a note to the mods, it might be helpful for us to move some of them over here.
(Aside: this is part of a larger known issue with dozens of vaccine-related posts in the covid threads as well. It's all a bit of a librarian's nightmare — simply because important stuff can later be hard to find unless one remembers specific keywords and is good at using the Avalon search function.)
:focus:
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Thank you for posting. Is there a way we can get the link to this video? I'd like to forward it on.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Quote:
Posted by
Satori
Thank you for posting. Is there a way we can get the link to this video? I'd like to forward it on.
Now I found the clip here
Can vaccinated people make the unvaccinated sick? Watch Dr Palevsky explain
April 21, 2021
and it's still on y0utube
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
This very important debate and counterpoint to the official, do-not-ask-questions, narrative is what is supposed to happen in medical institutions and research labs before releasing drugs, vaccines, etc... into the public to be consumed by an unsuspecting citizenry.
But, instead we are relegated to getting this information only after the toxic substance(s) is unleashed on the public, and only through alternative “conspiracy theory” sources on the internet. (And many thanks to all of them.)
Thank your god that we are getting this information. But is it too little, too late? I say “No”.
If this information is even partially accurate, and I am convinced it is more so than that, this “treatment” , ie, vax or jab, will be much worse than we people could have ever known or even suspected than is CV19 (SARS Cov 2) itself.
The people responsible must not be allowed to escape their responsibly and culpability, and must not avoid their just due.
¤=[Post Update]=¤
Quote:
Posted by
Delight
Many thanks.
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
I was just asking for the address for that clip too.Can we get the FB address for it too? Thanks
Quote:
Posted by
Delight
Wondering what is happening with Lawrence Palevsky. Is the treatment shedding and causing symptoms for this who did not get it?
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Hi Bill...thx for moving my above post re-shedding. Still trying to make my way around. So many different threads.
Hi Satori, I was forwarded that video by a friend (KB) who posted it at his personal YTY site. I will ask him for an origin point or that nurse's site and report back.
Dave - Toronto
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Quote:
Posted by
onawah
I was just asking for the address for that clip too.Can we get the FB address for it too? Thanks
FB address
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Considering that the top vaccine expert featured in Del Bigtree's video says the antibodies in the COVID jabs are destroying the recipients' immune systems, I would say there is a threat to the unvaxxed as well because it only follows that the vaxxed will be so susceptible to so many other illnesses including communicable ones.
https://www.bitchute.com/embed/ZFjj86buJWA8
Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1422885
From Clif High
SHEDDING WOO – EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT
4/20/21
2,697 views
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/shedding-woo/
(THIS ONE'S ON BITCHUTE, AND CLIF SAYS HE MAY POST IT ELSEWHERE AS WELL)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VJ4A4yu0veDA/
Review from Alexandra Bruce of Forbidden Knowledge:
"For years, Clif High published his ALTA Reports, to which I began subscribing in 2009, which were based on the predictive linguistics harvested and processed by his Web Bots starting in 1994, which scoured those areas of the internet rich in posted language, such as comment boards, social media, etc.
Clif believes his efforts proved that human beings are unconsciously psychic and that they begin accurately posting about future events, on average about 8-10 weeks before these events actually occur in physical reality. He published these reports until he was forced to quit, he says because the internet was gummed-up by the lies of the “Blue Chicken Cult” (aka “Blue Avians”) of Corey Goode.
The predictions were both short term and long term but throughout the time of the ALTA Reports, Clif says he saw language about “Desperation in Summertime” building over a number of years, which he now believes refers to the summer of 2021, due to the horrible fallout from the MRNA vaccines, which in turn will precipitate another linguistic cluster, which his reports referred to for years as the “Secrets Revealed” about UFOs, extraterrestrial life and their technology, etc.
Clif doesn’t know how this will play out, whether it will be a Deep State false flag alien invasion or whether the aliens will bypass the Deep State altogether and directly introduce themselves to us.
But ETs are the least of our concerns, as it seems clear to him that the MRNA vaccine is shaping up to be a mass-genocidal, Extinction Level Event. In this video, Clif echoes the warnings of Dr Vernon Coleman, that the vaccinated people will infect the unvaccinated people as they slough off their dead skin cells, which contain the MRNA contagion, thereby rendering everybody infertile or worse.
Clif says, “We’ve got this situation where people who are vaccinated are shedding cells, as we all do, continuously all day long; they’re shedding cells that have the vaccinated, pre-loaded MRNA in them. This vaccinated, pre-loaded MRNA is potentially a cause for this new reported phenomenon going around, which is women are having extremely rough periods; that menstruation has become very painful and debilitating and very suddenly.
“And prior to that, we had noticed that there was a huge rise in the statistical reporting of miscarriages across all of the Western world, where vaccines had been put out and where we had this mass-inoculation program going on. Miscarriages were just up 500% and 600% in just a little over a month and a half.
“Now, bear in mind that in 4 months, we’ve had a reported 3,000+ deaths and that equals all of the deaths for the last 13 years. So, we’re on the bad side of a trend, Guys. We do not, as humans have a good track record with vaccines. This trend is now starting to kick our ass, here, because we’re starting to show women that are having miscarriages who have NOT been vaccinated. And women that are having exceptionally difficult periods, to the point of debilitation. Even in older women, they’re saying that it is like nothing they’ve had in their entire history.
“So this is not a good sign. I was very much afraid that MRNA could be passed by kissing or by sex. We now know that that’s true, that’s happening. And now it looks like there’s MRNA passage is being done through contact with shed skin cells which have the MRNA within them – also, all the cells we respirate…
“So the desperation component is now going towards this push for infertility. So it looks like maybe the Powers That Be did, indeed have a giant depopulation agenda and if they did, then it would be fair to say, if that is conspiracy-fact, then it would be fair to say they’ve implemented it and there may be nothing we ca do about it, at this stage.
“There may be enough people inoculated with the vaccine that we’re now going to push infertility on most of the populace, due to the close contact of the vaccinated with the other unvaccinated and fertile people. We may, as a result of this have to alter our social order, to where the vaccinated people are put in some kind of coventry, where they’re excluded from contact with non-vaccinated; where they’re isolated and held back, so that the species can continue…
“It is highly probable that everyone who’s been vaccinated with the MRNA product is infertile. And if they’re not infertile, I would shudder to think as to what would be the outcome of their progeny, what that would look like. It’s that bad. The potential for this is quite severe.
“All we have is discovery. We’re continuing to discover new clusters of effects from this MRNA product, which is not a vaccine, which should be halted immediately and everybody that’s ever been involved with it, rounded up somewhere where we can just hold them for a while, while we sort this out to decide what we’re going to do with them. Because it may truly be a crime against humanity. The MRNA vaccination, if it is as bad as it appears at this stage may have doomed the entire species to infertility and we’ll expire as a species when the last human on Earth now dies. It could be that horrific. We just don’t know…
“The MRNA, which is intimately connected with reproduction of every cell and every part of every cell and then, on a larger level, it’s a key component to the reproduction of the human being, themselves, by the production of the gametes necessary to produce sperm and egg. So MRNA issues throughout the entire process. So, we can see if you have a very robust immune system and there’s these strange MRNAs coming in – now, bear i mind that our bodies cannot tolerate MRNA anywhere except in the cell, itself. If our bodies find that the stuff is in between the cells, there’s whole crews of scrubber things that come along to scrub it out. So, we’re very robust at scrubbing against MRNA.
“But MRNA is something we need within the cells. It’s just that we don’t need the strange stuff that is coming off the people tat have been vaccinated and apparently, women are reacting and it may be – it’s my supposition at this stage, sort of a woo conclusion, a very tentative, very nebulous, very wobbly, so that we can throw it away at any time – but the conclusion at the moment is that, ‘Hmm, maybe the MRNA is altered enough that it’s triggering the immune response within the women that get it to the point where their immune response then goes on to attack their own reproductive MRNA processes.”
In the US, these problems will disproportionately affect Democrats and members of Antifa and BLM and the realization of same will hit them hard, as it becomes clear, into 2022 that these mental and fertility problems are legitimate.
Clif says, “They lined up and took it en masse, they were true believers and the true believers are going to be basically, I think killed by the vaccine and killed early. MRNA, I do believe will cause prion-like or statin-like separations and voids in the brain and if the data on PubMed is accurate, then we can expect this to happen in 18 months to two years, it won’t be a 30-year process. And so, we’ll have a lot of very young people that will be debilitated. And they’re infertile.”
It’s been reported that 150 million people have been vaccinated in the USA. If true, Clif says, “The USA is finished. As a nation, it’s finished, because over the next 2 years, that 150 million will become 100% debilitated and will need care for whatever remains of their short lives and it’s going to destroy the social order. It’s going to break down the banking system, it’ll destroy the value of real estate or any damned thing, because, as these people become debilitated and run into problems, the first reaction we’ll have will be to put them in nursing homes or care facilities, which will soon become overwhelmed. And of course, who did we give the shots to, right in the beginning, with these 150 million? We gave them to the healthcare workers…
“The good news is that, even in early parts of the data reports about all of this badness, there were stuff saying, ‘Oh yeah, they’re going to just run and kill the Rothschilds, they’re just going to kill the Queen and everybody that’s a Royal and murder the political elite in our country – and in most countries – will simply be butchered, as this proceeds. This is our ‘Summer of Desperation’, this is the ‘Summer of Woo’. Remember, I kept saying, ‘Discovery is going to be the issue’ and ‘Discovery only lasts as long as it lasts.’
“So the social order will be breaking down around you, because of everybody’s mind’s going, because of the worry, whether they’ve got the shot or not. They’re going to be worried whether their wife or husband has gotten the shot and are they going to get an effect from it? Do they have to split up? Do they have to stay away from their kids, as more and more of these side effects come on out. I hope I’m wrong on all of this…
“If we can determine by September that, indeed that we’re going to be saddled with 150 million people dead or rapidly dying or debilitated, mentally or potentially mentally debilitated to the point where they can’t be trusted and/or have to be sequestered because they’re shedding the s*** in their skin, we’ve got real serious issues, as a species.
“And so things like property values become non-sequitur, they just don’t compute. Who cares? At some point, we’ll worry, ‘Do we have enough functioning workforce to get oil out of the ground to produce gasoline?’
“And it’s all their fault and they kept pushing it and Fauci and all these guys, Obama and all these f***ers. So, they’ve done it. We’re here. ‘Summer of Desperation’. We’ll see how it plays out. Hopefully, I’m terribly wrong about all of this. Hopefully, it is completely wrong. Hopefully, we’ll be much more resilient than it appears at the moment and we won’t be that affected by this horrible medical experiment. But at this point, it keeps getting worse and they’re covering-up the getting worse part. And unless we face it as adults, we can’t deal with it, we can’t address it…
“I expect that things will degrade – there’s a real potential that things will degrade very rapidly over these next two years. So, in that case, over the course of the two years…
“I can see that the good side of this is that there might be so many people dying on the planet, that war is not a possibility anymore. That we just have too many people dying off…
“All of my plans are held in abeyance…
“Good luck to all of us. It’s not a very good video. Didn’t want to have to make it. It’s been days and days and days. I’ve been getting these reports from people. I’ve had reports from a number of the nurses. They were the first ones send them to me, saying they didn’t know if it was related, they weren’t vaccinated, they wanted to escape the vaccination or turn it down at the hospital and they didn’t get it but…these reports from nurses have been coming for about a month now…There’s enough of them, now, that there’s a developing pattern. There’s enough of them now that they, themselves are discussing it, reporting it to each other and noticing that there’s a developing pattern.
“So, I’m hopeful that this understanding will percolate through the female aspect of our social order very rapidly and raise Holy Hell and maybe we can get this stuff stopped and examined and see what we need to do to aid those individuals that have been injected and see what we can do.
“Maybe there’s some way we can un-do the MRNA damage that’s been done. I don’t know, neither do they. Nobody knows about any of this sh**.
“Some of the knowledgeable doctors are very, very, very concerned about this and are worrying, like me, that this is species-affecting.
“OK, so I bummed you guys out enough, now already. I wish I could end on a really positive note but I can’t. I’m just concerned, I’m having to change my plans. It looks like our species has been affected to the point where we will all be affected, whether we are vaccinated or not and there’s no upside to it, at this stage.
“I’m not particularly depressed, because there’s so much in the way of unknowns. This is why I like living in woo, because you don’t get a firm paradigm set there. So, I can’t be uplifting abut the information but I can be uplifting in the general sense that we don’t know. We don’t know so much, that there’s huge holes, there for hope…there’s so much we don’t know…
“And I have faith in the spontaneous human reactions. OK. BLM and the riots? That’s not spontaneous. They get that sh** ginned-up on Twitter, they get all the social justice freaks all whipped-up to go get their buddies and it builds. That’s not spontaneous.
“Spontaneous human reactions, though do arise and we’ve seen them cause whole countries to change. Cacerolazo…the women beating the pots and pans for their missing relatives in Argentina during the Dirty Wars. That kind of thing. That was spontaneous; it just kinda happened and it changed the nature of the country. If we have such a thing happen – such things, by the way, Guys, they usually happen from the female side of the species. The spontaneous change in over-wooing of the social order from below. When men get involved, we call it revolution because we go to violence. We don’t have any other recourse.
“So, I’m hoping the women are going to get extremely upset and change the social order and stop this, as they will be the first noticeable victims of the side effects of the vaccine outside of someone else’s body. Strange days, Guys but we don’t know – there’s plenty of hope, so don’t get too down or anything and I’m going to continue looking at this and hey, we’ve survived terrible things and gotten this far.” "
Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1423306
Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/VJ4A4yu0veDA
and here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1423312
https://www.bitchute.com/embed/IZvzGXu6ejaE
Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1423302
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
This is a big concern for me as well. I can't remember the video where this was covered but since people shed skin every day, those vaxxed will be shedding mRNA through the skin. That is then "picked up" by an unvaxed person and then that mRNA has multiple ways of being absorbed into the body. Does this mean this would be the same as receiving the vax? And, there is also concern if this means that the frequency contained in the vax is then passed onto the unvaxed person and that will also affect them on a "spiritual" level - ie, after death following that frequency to another kind of enslavement? It seems to be damaging in and out of the body?
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
That nurse who posted the video above....her website is as follows:
http://www.truthunmasked.org/p/welcome.html
Then click on Stay Away / Warning ....for which she has other videos including Morgan Scot (above).
Hope this helps...as this is something I had no clue about until today. See, that's the thing that bugs me....all of this vaccine stuff is so experimental...we are the guinea pigs.
Dave - Toronto
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
-
Re: Can a 'vaccinated' person pass on a jab ingredient to an unvaccinated person?
Quote:
Posted by
Anna70
I'm not sure if this subject may have been covered already, but it is a worry I (and I'm sure others) have, as people around me have had/are having the jab (incidentally, I often feel as if I have failed them, but there is only so much you can do with little energy, when you're up against the tide of people's workplaces demanding it, their trust in 'science' and authorities, and the unrelenting propaganda).
Anyway, whatever cocktail is put into them, or whatever is created by their bodies as a result of that, I really do not want any bit of it to somehow be passed on to me, and I wonder if there is any evidence so far of such a risk with these particular 'vaccines'. Hopefully my worry is completely unfounded.
I think as long as you refrain yourself from french kissing or having sex with your colleagues, you should be golden. :sun:
Kidding aside, you should avoid their sneezing or coughing. Regarding these testimonies, there's no smoke without a fire.