Tucker Carlson

well, there is a first time for everything...
this is my first Thread.

I acknowledged Tucker Carlson the first time from videos post in Rense.com.
that was in Trump era, it was refreshing, it sound very good in all topics...
than i follow his show every day until i found this:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/pT6cP7N8ke0D/

9/11 is for me the Orkan razor for everybody.

everybody who dismiss tonen von Research in avionics, constructions, control demolitions, explosives, eye witnesses, firefighters, pilots and so on...

is not worth of my time anymore.

I knew he have political aspirations...and 9/11 IS KRYPTONITE FOR THAT !

Today he continues very good in all topics...my Brain accept that but my stomach rebel...
i never was a person in cognitive dissonance.

my motto: the truth will set you free, but first, it will piss you off.

what do you think about? and most important: how do you feel about?

Great topic Vicus, as he is influencing many people.
I’d like to hear feedback as well.

The name calling dismissals is always a red flag for me. People like Jesse Ventura and Phil Donahue were way ahead of their time in calling BS on the build up to the Iraq War, and they promptly lost their jobs for it at MSNBC; U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter endured endless ridicule in speaking what he knew to be true about WMD's, and I'm quite sure that didn't go unnoticed by Tucker.

That he wouldn't care to dip his toes into the 9/11 waters is understandable, as he saw a long and lucrative career ahead of him, but to roundly dismiss the U.S. role in creating, training, and arming of Al Qaida is quite another.

I wonder where he dares not trod these days? As he is, of course, a card carrying member of mainstream media maintaining a certain lane, for rating's sake aimed at a specific demographic, like so many others of varying political stripes.

One more thing: "Cancel Culture" (although it wasn't a thing then) came to mind, when saying he thought supporters of Ventura questioning 9/11 at that convention, should have been asked to leave. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. :)

No?

Thanks Vicus for this link.
I only learned of Carlson through the plandemic really.
I may have seen him occasionally before then but never took notice of him.

Actually I think I'm more disappointed by the interviewers than by Carlson!

I don't know if they had time to prepare for this or not?
Even if they didn't, this was such a wasted opportunity!

They come across as immature, naive interviewers; giddy, laughing and thinking they did a great job,
when in reality they totally blew it!

Carlson says a few times there is no evidence 9/11 was an inside job and that
"the buildings came down because a bunch of nutcases flew a plane into them".

I would have nailed him immediately for saying those things.

But I agree with you Vicus, 9/11 for me is also the litmus test.
If people haven't woken up to it yet, I just can't relate to them.

With the case of Carlson it's difficult to tell why he is saying what he is saying.
The two most likely explanations:

Either he:

1. Knows who butters his bread and wouldn't dare alienate himself from them.
OR
2. He has serious cognitive dissonance (like my brother) and has refused to challenge his
ingrained beliefs.

My comment: nobody is perfect, nobody is right about everything. Because Tucker is wrong about some things I think it is a mistake to dismiss him completely.

I watch him frequently, it's the only news I ever watch. Overall I think he is waking people up to the tyranny, AFAIK he is one of the few people in MSM questioning the vaccine orthodoxy. He has lots of guests on whom I respect, including Bret Weinstein and Dr. Robert Malone.

I can't access the video linked in the OP.

"Contains incitement to hatred"
Attachment 47013

Thank goodness Bitchute is getting proactive in protecting me from content that might make me get all hatey.

Because gosh I'm such a soft headed moron incapable of making any judgments for myself. So good on you Bitchute, good on you.

Quote:

---

Posted by Star Mariner

I can't access the video linked in the OP.

"Contains incitement to hatred"
Attachment 47013

Thank goodness Bitchute is getting proactive in protecting me from content that might make me get all hatey.

Because gosh I'm such a soft headed moron incapable of making any judgments for myself. So good on you Bitchute, good on you.

---

Huh. it's still visible here in the U.S. I don't know what they're talking about, I saw absolutely nothing of "Contains incitement to hatred".

Here you go Star Mariner, I actually managed to dig it up on YouTube:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=dK5Jx9SOQXg

Quote:

---

Posted by Gracy May

Huh. it's still visible here in the U.S. I don't know what they're talking about, I saw absolutely nothing of "Contains incitement to hatred".

---

Thanks Gracy, appreciated. I bet it was the algorithm that flagged this phrase at 20secs "...when Jesse Ventura got up and started saying 9/11 was an inside job".

I guarantee those 5 words was all it took, at least here anyway.

The full warning (for me in the UK) states,

This video is unavailable at your location due to the following restrictions on the parent channel:
Contains Incitement to Hatred

I like Tucker as a critical thinker who is able to play (untill now!) an accepted controversial position & role in the MSM .Sure he is compromised(who's not in that world?),but i see in this segment still some integrity combined with naivity,arrogance(normal for celebrities)and bias.Even a bit of uncertainty hiding behind a grin,but no falsness,..

Relating to Tucker Carlson - I don't watch any news but have watched videos of him on the Forum. The ones I've seen have led me to believe he is discerning of the truth in our present situation. That is all I can say about him. When I see or hear someone apparently changing their tune, I wonder if their family, friends, pets, etc have been threatened. I can't imagine what it would be like to have to choose between speaking the truth and allowing harm to come to someone you love. I for sure don't know if this is the case with Tucker, but I am sure it happens more than we think and we would never know.

Just to add, if Tucker Carlson knew, guessed, or believed anything at all re 9/11 truth as an inside job, he would not say a single darn thing about it. He would not I suspect even dare sympathise with its believers. Certainly not out in the open in front of a camera.

The above video isn't meaningful of anything. Whether he believes in government sponsored shenanigans on 9/11 or not, you'd never find out.

He was put in a position where all he could do was naturally distance himself. We all know that as a celebrity, and what's more a journalist, there are lines you just do not cross. To act otherwise would be to endanger 'professional suicide'. It would blow up his entire career.

Quote:

---

Posted by Alan

My comment: nobody is perfect, nobody is right about everything. Because Tucker is wrong about some things I think it is a mistake to dismiss him completely.

I watch him frequently, it's the only news I ever watch. Overall I think he is waking people up to the tyranny, AFAIK he is one of the few people in MSM questioning the vaccine orthodoxy. He has lots of guests on whom I respect, including Bret Weinstein and Dr. Robert Malone.

---

I agree... no need to throw the baby out with the bathwater as the saying goes...

For example... (21 minute clip from The Duran show)

Tucker Carlson does the unthinkable: Reports on OPCW hoax that almost pushed world to war

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=G5lND2WV-tI

Tucker Carlson is under attack - (him and his family) for the position he takes on many subjects and his guests -
on this occasion 9/11 is being used to attack him and to try and create distrust in the 'alternative' arena...

those pushing the divide and rule method of control like to keep us all corralled into our various labeled pens - and they don't like too much cross over...

I was surprised when Bitchute did the Incitement to Hate Warning Thing - I'd never seen that before from that site and I was shocked... thanks to Gracy May for presenting it from YouTube...

I suppose Bitchute was saying that the short clip was incitement to hate Tucker Carlson...because of his views on 9/11...? What else could it have been..
but Youtube approved of his dismissal of it being an Inside Job...

Clearly he has not looked very far into the whole 9/11 business - with all it's twists and turns and layers of deceit - but he does good work on other subjects...

I like Tucker, and for me, does more good than not regarding all. one has to know which battles to choose in order to be listened to .

perhaps this was just to far out on the limb for him. to be effective, you must remain in the game so to speak.

try with Tor browser

Quote:

---

Posted by wondering

Relating to Tucker Carlson - I don't watch any news but have watched videos of him on the Forum. The ones I've seen have led me to believe he is discerning of the truth in our present situation. That is all I can say about him. When I see or hear someone apparently changing their tune, I wonder if their family, friends, pets, etc have been threatened. I can't imagine what it would be like to have to choose between speaking the truth and allowing harm to come to someone you love. I for sure don't know if this is the case with Tucker, but I am sure it happens more than we think and we would never know.

---

That is certainly a possibility (threatened).

When I gave my two most likely explanations and mentioned:

" Knows who butters his bread and wouldn't dare alienate himself from them."

it certainly would include facing retribution (harm) should he alienate himself from them
(besides losing his paycheck).

Quote:

---

Posted by Star Mariner

Just to add, if Tucker Carlson knew, guessed, or believed anything at all re 9/11 truth as an inside job, he would not say a single darn thing about it. He would not I suspect even dare sympathise with its believers. Certainly not out in the open in front of a camera.

The above video isn't meaningful of anything. Whether he believes in government sponsored shenanigans on 9/11 or not, you'd never find out.

He was put in a position where all he could do was naturally distance himself. We all know that as a celebrity, and what's more a journalist, there are lines you just do not cross. To act otherwise would be to endanger 'professional suicide'. It would blow up his entire career.

---

I agree given his position, we can't read too much into what he said. However it was the manner in which he answered the questions that was the most disappointing. If I was in his position as a MSM broadcaster and knew 9/11 was an inside job, I would have prepared in advance a specific script to be used whenever confronted about 9/11. The general thrust of the script would be denial that it was an inside job, no hesitations, smirks etc. etc. but would also include a cleverly veiled hint that he knew what really happened.

Quote:

---

Posted by thepainterdoug

I like Tucker, and for me, does more good than not regarding all. one has to know which battles to choose in order to be listened to .

perhaps this was just to far out on the limb for him. to be effective, you must remain in the game so to speak.

---

Yes this is likely the case (knowing which battles to choose).

Quote:

---

Posted by jaybee

Quote:

---

Posted by Alan

My comment: nobody is perfect, nobody is right about everything. Because Tucker is wrong about some things I think it is a mistake to dismiss him completely.

I watch him frequently, it's the only news I ever watch. Overall I think he is waking people up to the tyranny, AFAIK he is one of the few people in MSM questioning the vaccine orthodoxy. He has lots of guests on whom I respect, including Bret Weinstein and Dr. Robert Malone.

---

I agree... no need to throw the baby out with the bathwater as the saying goes...

For example... (21 minute clip from The Duran show)

Tucker Carlson does the unthinkable: Reports on OPCW hoax that almost pushed world to war

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=G5lND2WV-tI

Tucker Carlson is under attack - (him and his family) for the position he takes on many subjects and his guests -
on this occasion 9/11 is being used to attack him and to try and create distrust in the 'alternative' arena...

those pushing the divide and rule method of control like to keep us all corralled into our various labeled pens - and they don't like too much cross over...

I was surprised when Bitchute did the Incitement to Hate Warning Thing - I'd never seen that before from that site and I was shocked... thanks to Gracy May for presenting it from YouTube...

I suppose Bitchute was saying that the short clip was incitement to hate Tucker Carlson...because of his views on 9/11...? What else could it have been..
but Youtube approved of his dismissal of it being an Inside Job...

Clearly he has not looked very far into the whole 9/11 business - with all it's twists and turns and layers of deceit - but he does good work on other subjects...

---

well, it is very ironic indeed, because Bitchute was promotet als alternative to youturd ,and they don't have any restrictions on it. you answer yourself this ironic question : ...because of his views on 9/11...? What else could it have been..

Quote:

---

Posted by Vicus

Quote:

---

Posted by jaybee

Quote:

---

Posted by Alan

My comment: nobody is perfect, nobody is right about everything. Because Tucker is wrong about some things I think it is a mistake to dismiss him completely.

I watch him frequently, it's the only news I ever watch. Overall I think he is waking people up to the tyranny, AFAIK he is one of the few people in MSM questioning the vaccine orthodoxy. He has lots of guests on whom I respect, including Bret Weinstein and Dr. Robert Malone.

---

I agree... no need to throw the baby out with the bathwater as the saying goes...

For example... (21 minute clip from The Duran show)

Tucker Carlson does the unthinkable: Reports on OPCW hoax that almost pushed world to war

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=G5lND2WV-tI

Tucker Carlson is under attack - (him and his family) for the position he takes on many subjects and his guests -
on this occasion 9/11 is being used to attack him and to try and create distrust in the 'alternative' arena...

those pushing the divide and rule method of control like to keep us all corralled into our various labeled pens - and they don't like too much cross over...

I was surprised when Bitchute did the Incitement to Hate Warning Thing - I'd never seen that before from that site and I was shocked... thanks to Gracy May for presenting it from YouTube...

I suppose Bitchute was saying that the short clip was incitement to hate Tucker Carlson...because of his views on 9/11...? What else could it have been..
but Youtube approved of his dismissal of it being an Inside Job...

Clearly he has not looked very far into the whole 9/11 business - with all it's twists and turns and layers of deceit - but he does good work on other subjects...

---

well, it is very ironic indeed, because Bitchute was promotet als alternative to youturd ,and they don't have any restrictions on it. you answer yourself this ironic question : ...because of his views on 9/11...? What else could it have been..

---

After seeing your comment and on further inspection :) ..... it's not that straight forward....

It appears that it is the channel MediaGiant that is the problem and not particularly that specific video -

I went to Bitchute and searched 'Tucker Carlson 9/11' and that's where the video in your OP popped up...

So what that channel has been restricted for - and how they fell foul of community guidelines I don't know -
I suppose a site like Bitchute is going to be infiltrated by CIA types trying to discredit it because it is more free than the widely censored YouTube... for example they host the Alex Jones shows...

Bitchute Community Guidelines...

https://support.bitchute.com/policy/guidelines/

Quote:

---

Posted by DaveToo

Thanks Vicus for this link.
I only learned of Carlson through the plandemic really.
I may have seen him occasionally before then but never took notice of him.

Actually I think I'm more disappointed by the interviewers than by Carlson!

I don't know if they had time to prepare for this or not?
Even if they didn't, this was such a wasted opportunity!

They come across as immature, naive interviewers; giddy, laughing and thinking they did a great job,
when in reality they totally blew it!

Carlson says a few times there is no evidence 9/11 was an inside job and that
"the buildings came down because a bunch of nutcases flew a plane into them".

I would have nailed him immediately for saying those things.

But I agree with you Vicus, 9/11 for me is also the litmus test.
If people haven't woken up to it yet, I just can't relate to them.

With the case of Carlson it's difficult to tell why he is saying what he is saying.
The two most likely explanations:

Either he:

1. Knows who butters his bread and wouldn't dare alienate himself from them.
OR
2. He has serious cognitive dissonance (like my brother) and has refused to challenge his
ingrained beliefs.

---

naiveté is a very good Chose of weapon to get trough the armor from VIP´S , they feel superior and invulnerable and they feel they can act las always do :whit Arroganz, dismissing all the pack als Parasiten, case closed.

I like Carlson, but disagree when he says "there is no evidence of an inside job".

You don't need to be a structural engineer to realize that building 7 could not fallen the way it did due to a "progressive collapse from a single central column", as the NIST Report concludes. What we observed was a collapse at freefall speed. To achieve this all 50 odd supportive steel columns and their trusses must have failed within a second - simultaneously.

Carlson is ignoring what his eyes are telling him, 9/11 is a bridge too far.

I found this tweet about Tucker on Candice Owens Twitter feed.

https://twitter.com/AhmedBaba_/statu...25810502082563

The comments on Tucker in the Ameb Baba feed are rather “different” to what I expected. As an outsider, the USA politics seems extreme divided / polarised and it boggles my mind how some people see “truth”.:facepalm:

Dave Is Left Speechless After Tucker Admits This (Pt. 1) | Tucker Carlson | MEDIA | Rubin Report
246,130 views Sep 6, 2021
19K
175
The Rubin Report
1.61M subscribers
"Dave Rubin of The Rubin Report talks to Tucker Carlson about why he left Washington D.C. for rural Maine, what he was most shocked to learn from working at CNN, and why Joe Biden’s failed Afghanistan withdrawal was far worse than the mainstream media has let on. Tucker first discusses how Washington D.C. became more polarized after the election of Donald Trump. He describes how his family was harassed at home and how that influenced him to leave Washington D.C for rural Maine. He also explains why he has never owned a TV or spent time on social media. Tucker also describes how he has been able to create a crowd sourced network to do the research for Tucker Carlson Tonight."

WATCH Dave’s PREVIOUS INTERVIEW with TUCKER CARLSON:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0UMM...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=yuMaZ49IaeY

Tucker talks about the vaccine mandates
9/13/21| BREAKING FOX NEWS
6,843 views Sep 13, 2021
3.7K
Fox News Alert
772K subscribers

(Tucker is getting closer and closer to the real vaccine agenda though he's still looking at it from a political perspective, but it's pretty amazing to see how close he's getting for a mainstream newscaster.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=V94OgNurx9I

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

Tucker talks about the vaccine mandates
9/13/21| BREAKING FOX NEWS
6,843 views Sep 13, 2021
3.7K
Fox News Alert
772K subscribers

(Tucker is getting closer and closer to the real vaccine agenda though he's still looking at it from a political perspective, but it's pretty amazing to see how close he's getting for a mainstream newscaster.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=V94OgNurx9I

---

Thanks onawah. The first half of the video is excellent for its content.
Do you know why it has strange edits throughout?
Was it possibly sabotaged by TPTB?

I don't know the reason, but I suspect it may have to do with copyright issues.
Perhaps Fox has permission to show videos from other sources during the initial broadcast of the show, but not on their youtube channel, or something like that.

Quote:

---

Posted by DaveToo

Thanks onawah. The first half of the video is excellent for its content.
Do you know why it has strange edits throughout?
Was it possibly sabotaged by TPTB?

---

I have such admiration for Tucker Carlson, my utmost respect! Go Tucker!!! It is amazing to me that he has never owned a TV...wonderful.

Quote:

---

Posted by DaveToo

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

Tucker talks about the vaccine mandates
9/13/21| BREAKING FOX NEWS
6,843 views Sep 13, 2021
3.7K
Fox News Alert
772K subscribers

(Tucker is getting closer and closer to the real vaccine agenda though he's still looking at it from a political perspective, but it's pretty amazing to see how close he's getting for a mainstream newscaster.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=V94OgNurx9I

---

Thanks onawah. The first half of the video is excellent for its content.
Do you know why it has strange edits throughout?
Was it possibly sabotaged by TPTB?

---

~~~

The videos — a very strong one :muscle: — has been removed from YouTube already, but here it is:

https://foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-c...merican-crisis

I didn't see any 'strange edits' — and like wondering/Diane, I have a huge amount of respect for the man. In my opinion, he gets very little wrong.

I agree this is an amazing video but it begs the question, wtf is going on - how can this be on mainstream media, it is grounded and sensible!

Rupert Murdoch, Chairman, Fox Corporation.

Lachlan K. Murdoch, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Fox Corporation.

My question exactly! Since when did Murdoch want the truth getting out?
Is this a sign of some of the minions rebelling against THE AGENDA?
Or is that part of the plan of causing more division?:noidea::suspicious::unsure:
(Someone should ask Clif High.)

Quote:

---

Posted by Ewan

I agree this is an amazing video but it begs the question, wtf is going on - how can this be on mainstream media, it is grounded and sensible!

Rupert Murdoch, Chairman, Fox Corporation.

Lachlan K. Murdoch, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Fox Corporation.

---

In the original video which I posted which was much longer, Tucker was focusing on the homeless problem and questioning why such a huge issue was being ignored in order to push the plandemic agenda with all its glaring discrepancies.
There were some video clips from other news sources showing the homeless on the streets of LA and another city (Portland? or Seattle? I can't remember now. Anyway, those were edited out in the video I posted, which I thought might have been due to copyright issues, since they did not originate with FOX.
.

Quote:

---

Posted by Bill Ryan

Quote:

---

Posted by DaveToo

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

Tucker talks about the vaccine mandates
9/13/21| BREAKING FOX NEWS
6,843 views Sep 13, 2021
3.7K
Fox News Alert
772K subscribers

(Tucker is getting closer and closer to the real vaccine agenda though he's still looking at it from a political perspective, but it's pretty amazing to see how close he's getting for a mainstream newscaster.

---

Thanks onawah. The first half of the video is excellent for its content.
Do you know why it has strange edits throughout?
Was it possibly sabotaged by TPTB?

---

~~~

The videos — a very strong one :muscle: — has been removed from YouTube already, but here it is:

https://foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-c...merican-crisis

I didn't see any 'strange edits' — and like wondering/Diane, I have a huge amount of respect for the man. In my opinion, he gets very little wrong.

---

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

In the original video which I posted which was much longer, Tucker was focusing on the homeless problem and questioning why such a huge issue was being ignored in order to push the plandemic agenda with all its glaring discrepancies.
There were some video clips from other news sources showing the homeless on the streets of LA and another city (Portland? or Seattle? I can't remember now. Anyway, those were edited out in the video I posted, which I thought might have been due to copyright issues, since they did not originate with FOX.

---

I was surprised by the candor in the video.

Philadelphia is the city.

kimgary on youtube has been documenting the streets there. Interestingly, there has been some discussion as to whether this is street theatre staged or real. In some videos, people seem to defy gravity as they lean into the air (looking drugged). Here is the latest

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=BBed0T1-r9k

That's right--it was Philly. I lived there for awhile. South Philly was a very strange place even back then, and people under the influence can assume very strange postures and positions, especially when on the "hard stuff".

Quote:

---

Posted by Delight

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

In the original video which I posted which was much longer, Tucker was focusing on the homeless problem and questioning why such a huge issue was being ignored in order to push the plandemic agenda with all its glaring discrepancies.
There were some video clips from other news sources showing the homeless on the streets of LA and another city (Portland? or Seattle? I can't remember now. Anyway, those were edited out in the video I posted, which I thought might have been due to copyright issues, since they did not originate with FOX.

---

I was surprised by the candor in the video.

Philadelphia is the city.

kimgary on youtube has been documenting the streets there. Interestingly, there has been some discussion as to whether this is street theatre staged or real. In some videos, people seem to defy gravity as they lean into the air (looking drugged). Here is the latest

---

I am not trying to give Carlson a pass but I also refuse to discuss the 9/11 issue. If you take it out of the confines of Avalon or other physical and digital locations that are willing to discuss the subject in-depth you are frowned upon and looked at as a conspiracy nut. I will listen, read and watch videos but I will not discuss the authenticity of the indictments. I do this because I have been down about as deep as you can get in the rabbit hole and it is a hard climb back out. Once you get back to the surface you understand that there is not a dam thing you can do about it and dwelling on the subject has a serious impact on your state of mind. So I have made a trade-off, let 9/11 go for my mental health, win the battles that I can and protect my credibility. Some may consider it a cop-out but I consider it a sound mental health plan.

I think it is entirely conceivable that Carlson has made a similar trade-off. 9/11 is a hill that he is not willing to die on.

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

In the original video which I posted which was much longer, Tucker was focusing on the homeless problem and questioning why such a huge issue was being ignored in order to push the plandemic agenda with all its glaring discrepancies.
There were some video clips from other news sources showing the homeless on the streets of LA and another city (Portland? or Seattle? I can't remember now. Anyway, those were edited out in the video I posted, which I thought might have been due to copyright issues, since they did not originate with FOX.

---

In all fairness Natalie (and of course Tucker), the U.S. homeless problem is being no more ignored under Biden, than the last administration. Or any others for that matter.

A decent parallel analogy would be Tucker questioning why a huge issue such as Assange being persecuted and behind bars, is now being ignored under Biden for whatever nefarious purpose.

Of course Biden is ignoring both issues, he obviously doesn't give a s##t either, but to steal from Billy Joel he didn't start the fire.

A good little history refresher in this video:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cDPnsTRAvIM

With respect, the homeless problem is growing much worse very rapidly and will continue to grow with the elimination of small businesses and the cessation of unemployment benefits, and the ban on evictions, etc.
With the influx of immigrants, it will undoubtedly grow exponentially worse, since there are no jobs for them and the government is running out of money to pay for such reckless policies.
We've seen what havoc this same situation has caused in Europe with rising rates of criminal activity, not to mention economic crisis.
The issue isn't who's ignoring it more, the issue is that it's being ignored.
As I pointed out here:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1451819
...Tucker is still looking at the problems from a political perspective which he needs to transcend; but the fact that he's addressing these issues in a fairly straight on, common sense manner at all on a mainstream news show is progress, at least. Though we still don't know why that is being permitted by Murdoch, who is most certainly a member of the elite, at last reporting.
( I've seen reports that the immigrants are being given Ivermectin and not required to take the jab, so perhaps the elites' plan is to allow them to take jobs that Americans held previously but will no longer be able to hold because they are sick and dying from the jabs. But that's a whole different discussion.)

Quote:

---

Posted by Gracy May

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

In the original video which I posted which was much longer, Tucker was focusing on the homeless problem and questioning why such a huge issue was being ignored in order to push the plandemic agenda with all its glaring discrepancies.
There were some video clips from other news sources showing the homeless on the streets of LA and another city (Portland? or Seattle? I can't remember now. Anyway, those were edited out in the video I posted, which I thought might have been due to copyright issues, since they did not originate with FOX.

---

In all fairness Natalie (and of course Tucker), the U.S. homeless problem is being no more ignored under Biden, than the last administration. Or any others for that matter.

A decent parallel analogy would be Tucker questioning why a huge issue such as Assange being persecuted and behind bars, is now being ignored under Biden for whatever nefarious purpose.

Of course Biden is ignoring both issues, he obviously doesn't give a s##t either, but to steal from Billy Joel he didn't start the fire.

A good little history refresher in this video:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cDPnsTRAvIM

---

Quote:

---

Posted by wondering

I have such admiration for Tucker Carlson, my utmost respect! Go Tucker!!! It is amazing to me that he has never owned a TV...wonderful.

---

This is what he actually said in the interview:

"I don't have a television, I don't go on the internet, I don't use social
media, I'm pretty insulated from that stuff ..."

This really stretches credulity.

I too don't have a TV (I do, but it's not connected to cable and I haven't watched it for more than 20 years), and I don't use social media.
But to say he doesn't go on the internet!!! #%*&#^#@ ?????

So how exactly does he get his information to build his shows? HUH ?????
He certainly couldn't build his stories based on what he reads in mainstream newspapers!!!

Something is really fishy with what he said.
It just doesn't add up, I'm sorry.

My impression, from what I can recall, is that he has a large group of people with whom he is in contact on a very regular basis. I got the impression that this is a very active group who no doubt communicate very frequently. Not social media in the same way as twitter, fb, etc. Not "owning" a tv may be different from never watching speeches, etc. I'm not defending him since I don't know, but I think he is making a distinction....I could also be wrong. Regardless, I appreciate his articulation of the whole awful mess to date and I am happy that because it was on Fox, it may have reached some people who do not go to alternative sites. One hopes.

He probably has a whole team of people who DO go on the internet and have TVs & so on who keep him updated.
It's not that much of a stretch.
And it's actually pretty smart of him, if that's the case, since he isn't being subjected to as many EMFs and what I'm calling "computer brain" (addiction) as his staff.

Quote:

---

Posted by DaveToo

Quote:

---

Posted by wondering

I have such admiration for Tucker Carlson, my utmost respect! Go Tucker!!! It is amazing to me that he has never owned a TV...wonderful.

---

This is what he actually said in the interview:

"I don't have a television, I don't go on the internet, I don't use social
media, I'm pretty insulated from that stuff ..."

This really stretches credulity.

I too don't have a TV (I do, but it's not connected to cable and I haven't watched it for more than 20 years), and I don't use social media.
But to say he doesn't go on the internet!!! #%*&#^#@ ?????

So how exactly does he get his information to build his shows? HUH ?????
He certainly couldn't build his stories based on what he reads in mainstream newspapers!!!

Something is really fishy with what he said.
It just doesn't add up, I'm sorry.

---

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

The issue isn't who's ignoring it more, the issue is that it's being ignored.

---

That of course I agree with, but could only comment on how you phrased the issue in that particular post in the box below, which points the finger of guilt squarely at the current administration:

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

In the original video which I posted which was much longer, Tucker was focusing on the homeless problem and questioning why such a huge issue was being ignored in order to push the plandemic agenda with all its glaring discrepancies.

---

Now being that the topic is Tucker Carlson, it gives me a bit of leeway to further elaborate on how MSM works, per what you said below:

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

...Tucker is still looking at the problems from a political perspective which he needs to transcend; but the fact that he's addressing these issues in a fairly straight on, common sense manner at all on a mainstream news show is progress, at least. Though we still don't know why that is being permitted by Murdoch, who is most certainly a member of the elite, at last reporting.

---

From Tucker Carlson to Rachel Maddow, to Chris Cuomo to Anderson Cooper, these people are not told what they can and can't say, it's all about the hiring process. The employer already knows full well who they're hiring, and are already well assured the new prospect knows the lane they are required to stay in. If they were really endangering any elite projects, they would instantly become Julian Assange/Ed Snowden material.

To each of these 4 examples watching from their couches every evening, their host of choice is cutting edge, they're on it! But beauty is in the eye of the beholder in the game of television ratings, and each given host is well aware of their given parameters, and exactly what their target demographic wants to hear.

You think Rachel Maddow fans aren't blown away she's got the hot, inside scoop every night when she preaches to that choir?

Cable news is a business first and foremost, and first and foremost is serve the base. Take their breath away when possible every evening with ooohs and ahhhs, and keep them coming back for more.

There's a lot of this in alt media as well.

But back to Tucker. :)

In the case of Tucker, his views have changed quite a lot over the past couple of years though he's still Republican, but I have no doubt that Murdoch is OK with that, or Tucker would not still be on FOX.
I'm guessing that there is an audience that Tucker is appealing to which Murdoch doesn't want to lose, even if it goes against the hard line agenda.
Which is smart of him.

Quote:

---

Posted by Gracy May

But back to Tucker. :)

---

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

In the case of Tucker, his views have changed quite a lot over the past couple of years though he's still Republican, but I have no doubt that Murdoch is OK with that, or Tucker would not still be on FOX.
I'm guessing that there is an audience that Tucker is appealing to which Murdoch doesn't want to lose, even if it goes against the hard line agenda.
Which is smart of him.

---

So long as Tucker continues pleasing his hard right leaning Libertarian demographic (essentially the patriot movement), he has no employment worries so long as he stays inside the confines of that particular Overton Window. Same as all other network stars in their various lanes of profit driven public discourse.

They can push the boundaries, no problemo, but only so far and they know where those boundaries are...

Quote:

---

The Overton window is the range of policies politically acceptable to the mainstream population at a given time. It is also known as the window of discourse.

---