Printable View
Physicians for Informed Consent have just released a press release about the effectiveness of the Covid jabs as related to Covid deaths.
Covid deaths are really what this whole plandemic is officially about right?
Physicians for Informed Consent: CDC Data Show COVID-19 Mass Vaccination Has Had No Measurable Impact on COVID-19 Mortality in the U.S.
A study of data from over a year ago, not yet peer reviewed, discussed by Dr. Michel Raszek of Edmonton Canada.
Vaccine negative effectiveness - COVID-19 vaccines update 56
2,039 views Aug 24, 2022
Merogenomics
109K subscribers
494
Data from the UK showing how in the age of the Omicron the vaccine exhibited negative effectiveness. What does this mean and why this might be happening with these particular variants is discussed.
Described content:
Vaccine negative effectiveness: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.11...
Neutralizing antibodies1: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056...
Neutralizing antibodies2: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.11...
Qatar data: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.11...
Viral decay in vax and unvaxx: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056...
"COVID-19 - Q and A for the People#14" event on ZOOM:
https://merogenomics.eventbrite.ca
Epigenetic aging DNA test survey: https://forms.gle/MWy1USV5QpiJ7nSFA
Holistic proactive wellbeing event: moneyminddna.ca or https://merogenomics.eventbrite.ca
________________________________________________________________
Dr. Raszek Credentials: https://merogenomics.ca/en/about/
https://youtube.com/watch?v=69iCapONtDs
Dr. Raszek discusses a pre-print paper (not yet peer-reviewed) which claims it is the first review of risk/benefit analysis of the Covid vax in university aged people (18-39). Says that the paper calls university vaccine mandates unethical.
mRNA vaccines risk benefit analysis - COVID-19 vaccines update 64
1,890 views Premiered 4 hours ago
Merogenomics
111K subscribers
“First ever risk/benefit analysis of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for university students age population. What should be the ethical standard of mandating vaccination and has that standard been met according to the authors of the discussed publication?”
Described content:
Benefit/risk analysis: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.c...
Location: Gowlland Tod Provincial Park, Vancouver Island, BC.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=xr4lvruZK64
Not much research being done on this, but Dr. Raszek has found a couple papers. A huge vaccination of chickens, not for Covid, points to dire possibilities regarding Covid vaccination.
Vaccine-induced immune escape - COVID-19 vaccines update 68
5,794 views Premiered 4 hours ago
Merogenomics
111K subscribers
“Investigation of why the SARS-CoV-2 virus has managed to evolve and escape the immunity of vaccines and natural infection. Two prevailing theories exist. We however are focused on the least popular and least discussed in science, and that is the INFLUENCE OF VACCINE INTERVENTION on pathogen evolution. Come and listen to the science by Dr. Mikolaj Raszek
Described content:
Vaccine-induced immune escape study 1: https://www.nature.com/articles/s4155...
Above study review: https://www.nature.com/articles/s4155...
Vaccine-induced immune escape study 2: https://academic.oup.com/emph/article...
2nd study mentioning COVID-19 vaccine-induced immune escape: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/8/1603
"COVID-19 - Q and A for the People#17" event on ZOOM:
https://merogenomics.eventbrite.ca
Epigenetic aging DNA test survey: https://forms.gle/MWy1USV5QpiJ7nSFA
Holistic proactive wellbeing event: moneyminddna.ca or https://merogenomics.eventbrite.ca
________________________________________________________________
Dr. Raszek Credentials: https://merogenomics.ca/en/about/“
https://youtube.com/watch?v=X6kuIY8ZKE8
I would love to see this Dr. Raszek sit down and have a face-to-face discussion with Dr. Cowan (or Dr. Kaufman) about these theories.
I'd pay big bucks. :pop2:
DaveToo, I think you might appreciate Dr. Barr Lando and Mike Winner on the Alfa Vedic channel on YouTube. He is a brilliant man and they cover all sorts of very interesting topics. I mean really interesting.Quote:
Posted by DaveToo
A biblical prophecyI am not a Christian but the bible definitely has prophetic and lots of other value depending on how one looks at it. I most certainly value the teachings of Jesus Christ.Quote:
Dan 12:4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
Anyway, my point is that this means those that are open to it and have cleared themselves energetically to receive knowledge will have increased access to the field of information that is all around us, as Edgar Cayce did. The guys on Alfa Vedic are two shining examples of those accessing the field vs much of the stale thinking that passes for knowledge these days.
There are others too. One side of this realm is a fear based death cult and it is crumbling before our eyes and then there is another side with fresh new ideas and are creating that paradigm right next to the death cult that controls with fear and intimidation and scarcity
I am only beginning to understand how friggin amazing the human body and anything living is.Basically the antithesis of what I was taught. All you have to do is be willing to follow the truth and be willing to not set parameters as to how far you will go. I find many will follow to a certain point and then it gets really uncomfortable. If you sincerely state that you would like the true nature of reality and be able to entertain with an open mind what comes your way, well life is absolutely amazing. As far as I am concerned we grow old when we believe we have it all figured out and that is that. You can be old at 20 and young and vibrant at 100. The universe will never disappoint if you are open, sincere and are willing to be wrong. I feel like I have spent the last few years doing that over and over. It can be discouraging at times and even depressing but you just keep walking through it any way.
I feel like this is one of those things that sort of wrote itself, so something, someone wants you to hear this.....with love and respect,Pam
November 23, 2022
"The Washington Post reports data from the CDC showing who is dying from Covid and who is not. It is shocking data that shows that politicians can no longer say that this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated."
Just the first couple or few of the video is relevant.
Huxley and Orwell warned us in fiction about history being re-written regularly.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FiPghIwX...jpg&name=small
The Washington Post now admits that most of Americans who are dying from Covid have been vaccinated: https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...-covid-deaths/
Pam I am a very open-minded person.Quote:
Posted by PamQuote:
Posted by DaveToo
... All you have to do is be willing to follow the truth and be willing to not set parameters as to how far you will go. I find many will follow to a certain point and then it gets really uncomfortable.
If you sincerely state that you would like the true nature of reality and be able to entertain with an open mind what comes your way, well life is absolutely amazing.
I am also a critical thinker.
So when when I analyze two theories that are in direct opposition to each other (they can't both be true), I make note of it.
I don't necessarily pass judgments about the theories. But I do think rationally and say to myself, "Someone is right and someone is wrong about their theory."
There would be a third option in the bolded section.Quote:
Posted by DaveTooPam I am a very open-minded person.Quote:
Posted by PamQuote:
Posted by DaveToo
... All you have to do is be willing to follow the truth and be willing to not set parameters as to how far you will go. I find many will follow to a certain point and then it gets really uncomfortable.
If you sincerely state that you would like the true nature of reality and be able to entertain with an open mind what comes your way, well life is absolutely amazing.
I am also a critical thinker.
So when when I analyze two theories that are in direct opposition to each other (they can't both be true), I make note of it.
I don't necessarily pass judgments about the theories. But I do think rationally and say to myself, "Someone is right and someone is wrong about their theory."
They could both be wrong.
Yes Ewan of course you are right.Quote:
Posted by EwanThere would be a third option in the bolded section.Quote:
Posted by DaveTooPam I am a very open-minded person.Quote:
Posted by PamQuote:
Posted by DaveToo
... All you have to do is be willing to follow the truth and be willing to not set parameters as to how far you will go. I find many will follow to a certain point and then it gets really uncomfortable.
If you sincerely state that you would like the true nature of reality and be able to entertain with an open mind what comes your way, well life is absolutely amazing.
I am also a critical thinker.
So when when I analyze two theories that are in direct opposition to each other (they can't both be true), I make note of it.
I don't necessarily pass judgments about the theories. But I do think rationally and say to myself, "Someone is right and someone is wrong about their theory."
They could both be wrong.
But in cases such as this one (viruses exist, viruses do not exist) a third 'option' isn't possible.
Kind of like you are either pregnant or not pregnant. :)
If you know of a third option for pregnancy, I'm all ears!
Heh, would have helped if I'd known what the converstaion was about I guess, before jumping in with a smart-ass (in hindsight) comment.Quote:
Posted by DaveTooYes Ewan of course you are right.Quote:
Posted by EwanThere would be a third option in the bolded section.Quote:
Posted by DaveToo
They could both be wrong.
But in cases such as this one (viruses exist, viruses do not exist) a third 'option' isn't possible.
Kind of like you are either pregnant or not pregnant. :)
If you know of a third option for pregnancy, I'm all ears!
:yield:
CDC admits vaccinated people who never had covid were 3 times as likely to be infected as unvaccinated ...
and Lancet published a study that confirmed this saying ... vaccinated people who never had covid were 4 times as likely to have severe illness...
Aw Crap....
2022-12-26 14:30 by Karl Denninger
Well, here's the medical facts that entirely explain why people with more shots get more covid.
I've been paying attention to this possibility for a while but until the study work came out that proved it all there was is speculation. ADE ("Antibody dependent enhancement") is a fairly poorly-understood thing; most people believe it is confined to making a particular infection more serious than it would otherwise be. Of course having it occur when it otherwise would not fits that quite-nicely, but isn't what people tend to think about.
Now, unfortunately, we have the evidence. Here's the salient graph and lots of discussion which I'll try to recap for you here:
https://www.rintrah.nl/wp-content/up...esresponse.jpg
Let me explain this one for you because it makes very clear what's going on. There are multiple sub-types of IgG antibodies. IgG are the last ones that show up; IgA typically is in the mucosa of the nose, and is a "front line" of defense if you will. IgM shows up second; it generally is gone about two weeks or so after you recover. IgG is the "long term" antibody recognition but it has multiple subtypes.
This is very important for human and animal life, because not all things that can elicit a serious immune response should get one. For example: A bee sting. A serious immune response to that could kill you and in people seriously-allergic that's a real risk. So why don't most people get a serious immune response?
As it turns out they sort of do, but its focuses in one sort of IgG build, IgG4, which suppresses the cascade of events that cause the body to go after the thing in question and destroy it, along with all the side effects that produces (fever, serious inflammation, etc.)
Well, when you get Covid typically IgG3 is the one that neutralizes most of the virus. IgG1 and 2 do some of the work, but most of it is done by IgG3. You're not supposed to build an IgG4 response, and with natural infection without vaccination you don't, thus there's no inhibition and your response is and remains effective at neutralizing whatever it is. Typical vaccines (e.g. measles) elicit a response that looks exactly like an actual infection because that's how they're designed and intended; they use the whole virus and their intent is to make your body think it is being invaded by the real deal and respond as it would to the real deal.
None of the western world Covid jabs do this on purpose. They were all crafted to use only part of the virus, and the reason for that is past experience trying to create coronavirus vaccines all ended in failure with many of them producing wild enhancement of the infection instead of protection and in animal testing reliably killed the animals. Thus the decision was made without long-term safety and efficacy testing to use only the spike, with the idea that doing so would prevent the bad outcome.
They were wrong; it didn't prevent the bad outcome but instead shifted it in ways that were wildly insidious and unforeseen.
As it turns out what is now in the data is that IgG3, which the component that provides most of the protection against Covid is down to a flat zero by the time you take the third shot while IgG4 which causes the body to tolerate the infection and not clear it skyrockets from nothing prior to the second shot to being extremely high for the third and subsequent.
This was never detected in the trials because they didn't look and it takes time to find it because the conversion only happens when you get infected after you're jabbed. So if you only test for three months and don't look at the IgG profile you'll never see it happen, never mind that until you boost the data is that while its detectable after the second shot (and thus could have been detected if they bothered to look) the response curve is exponential and its the third one that basically zeros the IgG3 response if, following the first booster, you get infected again -- and you will as neutralization from the booster itself wanes.
Remember, IgG4 causes the body to tolerate the infection rather than attack and clear it.
This turns you into a walking virus mutation and production factory, a source of infection to everyone around you and, to the extent that the virus does direct damage to your body systems, and we know the spike does, it also is likely to lead to very severe long-term problems that look like other conditions. Nobody is looking for spike damage specifically in, for example, heart attacks, strokes and pulmonary embolisms, never mind the possibility of potentiating cancer by suppressing immune response if that suppression and tolerance goes beyond Covid, and it very well might. If that's not bad enough everyone that got jabbed has the same profile of response where the normal situation is that responses differ in different people because our body systems operate slightly differently (we're all genetically unique.)
Now who's most-likely to have had the most number of jabs and thus are walking around tolerating infections and giving them others? Health care workers! And who goes to the hospital or doctor? Compromised individuals who can least-withstand infections. Gee, that was smart, right?
What's worse is that we do not know if this is local to Covid or even just coronaviruses. It might not be. We may now have created a couple hundred million people in the US alone who have coded their immune systems to tolerate certain proteins that are common across all manner of respiratory viruses and worse, if its not local to viruses to be more-susceptible to cancer and other immune-sensitive problems with no way to reverse the effects!
If you recall I pointed out very early on in this thing that jabbing people with a non-sterilizing immune product, which these jabs all are, was wildly irresponsible because at minimum it would likely cause a decrease in symptoms and thus make it more likely rather than less that you'd go out and infect other people unknowingly. That was and remains correct however what nobody knew because we didn't look is that said non-sterilizing jabs had an even worse outcome in that they shift your immune response from elimination to tolerance so now, particularly after the third, you are likely to carry and not eliminate covid which makes you a literal Typhoid Mary, and if that's not enough we have no idea if this effect is local to Covid itself (which, in the world of Omicron isn't so awful as Omicron doesn't seem to be killing many people) but it may extend to influenza and even RSV, and is even more-likely to extend to the other two common beta coronaviruses OC43 and HKU1.
And finally, this may be permanent in those people who took the jabs. We don't know.
But what we do know, factually, is that when you get infected with Covid post Jab #3 your neutralizing antibody product is a statistical zero while your "tolerance" antibody production shoots the moon. This is exactly backward from what you want to happen and we are now left trying to figure out exactly how badly you screwed both yourself and others.
https://market-ticker.org/smilies-local/toldyaso.gif
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=247709
Thank you for this, Sue. There is some terminology that I don’t understand, but I get the gist of it.
I read the linked source article, and want to recommend a further link within it. This is found at the text “Here’s the salient graph”, just above the graph (which is the 6th of 8 graphical pics in the further link).
I read the whole (further) page, including all of the many comments. The article has even more that I don’t understand, but the comments explain and expand the subject mightily. Lots of recommendations and links there (comments), for people more studious or consequent than I.
That further link:
https://www.rintrah.nl/the-trainwrec...mune-response/
Quote:
Posted by Sue (Ayt)
Dr. Raszek discusses what in known about the possibility of breath-borne exochromes, about which scientific studies are both recent and few. First of a 3-part series. L=25:17. Recorded along a riverfront at a city in Switzerland.
Shedding vaccine material? - Investigation Part 1
Merogenomics
112K subscribers
3,864 views Premiered 9 hours ago
“Due to numerous inquiries on this topic, we have decided to delve into it more deeply. Many of you are convinced that vaccine shedding is feasible based on your own experiences. Our aim is to explore the possibility of vaccine shedding and how it could occur. In this initial video, we will examine the FDA's definition of shedding and the types of materials that may be shed, including those that could potentially contain vaccine material.”
https://youtube.com/watch?v=K9jOxkZJQfg
As always, such a pleasure to watch Dr. Raszek speak while walking outdoors. Nietzsche spoke about the usefulness of walking to thinking. Probably still Switzerland (couldn’t see a clue), says he will be going home tomorrow (likely meaning Edmonton).
He again mentions that a key driver of the interest in ‘vaccine shedding’ is from women having menstrual irregularities following close proximity to vaccinated people. He is looking hard at this issue, following the science, and speaking within the current constraints. I think he’s a good guy, on a mission, like Dr. John Campbell.
Shedding vaccine material? - Investigation Part 2: exosomes in vaxxed, exosome vaccines (update 83)
Merogenomics
113K subscribers
4,977 views Premiered 9 hours ago (edit to add: 3.23.23)
“Get ready for the latest installment of our groundbreaking multi-video series! We're diving deep into the burning question: can vaccine material be shed through breath? In this episode, we explore a riveting study on the circulating exosomes containing Spike proteins found in vaccinated individuals. Could this biological material actually stimulate the immune system? Plus, we'll give you the inside scoop on the development of COVID-19 vaccines using exosomes as a delivery vehicle.”
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ow63watUUSA
Quote:
Posted by JohnnycomelatelyThank you for this, Sue. There is some terminology that I don’t understand, but I get the gist of it.
I read the linked source article, and want to recommend a further link within it. This is found at the text “Here’s the salient graph”, just above the graph (which is the 6th of 8 graphical pics in the further link).
I read the whole (further) page, including all of the many comments. The article has even more that I don’t understand, but the comments explain and expand the subject mightily. Lots of recommendations and links there (comments), for people more studious or consequent than I.
That further link:
https://www.rintrah.nl/the-trainwrec...mune-response/
Quote:
Posted by Sue (Ayt)
thanks to Sue and Johnnycomelately...
I, too think I get the gist of it.... that somehow they have managed to create a mRNA nano concoction that messes with the immune system - by~passing the levels that attack invasions dangerous to the body and elevating the part (IgG4) that tolerates harmful invasion that the body sometimes has to employ - like for a bee sting -
the body isn't responding to harmful invasion (because other levels of immune protection aren't working) so it's like a slow overall breakdown building up trouble all the time - that eventually kills prematurely but the cause of it would be hidden (ie the jabs)- they must think they have the perfect depopulation programme going on - the murder weapon completely hidden from view - buried under piles of disinformation and distraction -
The number of lipid coated nano particles injected into the body in one dose is apparently an incredibly high number - I've heard different figures mentioned up to 50 BILLION - !!!
People have no idea what is coded into the nano particles.... maybe strings of amino acids that elevate IgG4... that allows the slow but sure destruction of the body - - - someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think that's it.... how they are doing it - only excess deaths can expose what's going on but they are banking on being able to attribute them to other causes...
By the way the link in Sue's post is now non existent but the one in Johnnycomelately's post still works...
Thank you jaybee. Good thought, and good intel.
Here is Mr. Raszek with part 3 about shedding, walking his talk. “For good immunity, stay active, stay healthy”. Back in Canada, up on a mountain, still winter there. Location as noted in the description is unfamiliar to me. I hope he knows that hungry bears will soon be waking up out there.
Shedding vaccine material? - Investigation Part 3: passive immunity + exosome decoys (update 84)
Merogenomics
117K subscribers
10,452 views Premiered 14 hours ago
“Another installment looking at supporting science that spike proteins could be shed (from vaccinated or naturally infected individuals) leading to a form of passive shared immunity. In this video we discuss first observed possibility of shedding anti-spike antibodies as well as how spike-carrying exosomes could act as potential decoys to protect the virus from antibodies.
Location: Pulpit mountain, Alberta”
https://youtube.com/watch?v=XeKrfT4d6XM
:bump: Watch these while you can: the previous vid from 1 week ago (April 1, ‘23) has since been removed by YT for “violating YouTube’s terms of service”.
FDA poised to grant EUA to 7th Dose of Vax! Is this Evidence Based or Made Up?
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
152K subscribers
17,498 views Apr 8, 2023
“Vinay Prasad, MD MPH; Physician & Professor
Hematologist/ Oncologist
Professor of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medicine
Author of 450+ Peer Reviewed papers, 2 Books, 2 Podcasts, 100+ op-eds.
If you want to contact me, do it here: http://www.vinayakkprasad.com/contact”
https://youtube.com/watch?v=xLospLhHXro
thanks - that was a good short video raising vital questions - shame about the other videos about shedding getting censored on YouTube...but no surprise under the circumstances - the circumstances being that we appear to be in the middle of a huge culling of the human population - a non specific genocide - affecting all Peoples across the planet -Quote:
Posted by Johnnycomelately
I stumbled on this presentation by Dr Philip Mcmillan that goes into the subject of the raised IgG4 part of the immune system - that was discussed on the previous page...
Potential Danger of an almost 4000% IgG4 rise in COVID-19 ...(13:49)
Quote:
Streamed live 11 hours ago (8th April 2023)
What is IgG4 antibody and why would it rise almost 4000% after covid vaccination?
Irrgang, Pascal, et al. "Class switch towards non-inflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination." Science immunology (2022): eade2798.
https://www.science.org/doi/full/10....mmunol.ade2798
5:00.... talks about there being 'inadvertent effects' and 'unknown unknowns' regarding the dramatic rise of IgG4 linked to the injections - but that's because he hasn't yet taken the final step... the terrible step.... when it sinks in that the 'vaccine' is almost certainly a carefully designed bio weapon being used to depopulate.... he still has good questions and points to make while remaining innocent of the horrible implications...
5:50.... explains how IgG4 functions in regard to repeated bee stings ---speculation....a thought occurred to me, a nasty thought - what if somehow a bee sting is encoded in the lipid nano particles with the spike protein code - and this is raising the IgG4 - what a dastardly but simple plot that would be - using the beloved bee...
10:18.... the chart showing the rise of IgG4 compared to IgG1, 2 and 3...
17:15 ... observes that this huge rise in IgG4 antibodies doesn't occur with other vaccines...
quote from around 12:18...
indeed....Quote:
"here is the problem with Omicrom... these viruses are extremely good at suppressing interferon - interferon is the signalling protein that warns your body for every kind of viral infection and some bacterial infection - if this infection is potentially persistent, long acting - could we see a rise in multiple other viral and bacterial infections across the population - this is the potential danger -so in and of itself the spike protein tollerence seems to be reducing the the risk of severe covid19 - our question still is what does that mean for the population in the future for the next few months or years in regard to exposure to other infections...."
A Colossal Failure Around The World
BY TYLER DURDEN; ZeroHedge
MONDAY, MAY 15, 2023 - 05:00 AM
Authored by Colleen Huber via The Epoch Times,
Let’s summarize what we now know of the negative efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, and why vaccinated people—not the unvaxxed—suffer frequent bouts of COVID-19.
The COVID-19 vaccines—and the new bivalents, of which they are a part—are alarmingly and irredeemably unsafe, as well as ineffective for the advertised purposes. It is increasingly recognized by laypeople, physicians, and scientists throughout the world that the COVID-19 vaccines are neither safe, nor effective, nor reversible.
In this article, I show irrefutable proof that the COVID-19 vaccines are irredeemably ineffective. (See many dozens of my other Substack articles, and my book, “Neither Safe Nor Effective,” on how dangerous these vaccines are.)
Background
U.S. mortality data at the end of 2020 did not support the allegation of a pandemic, because there was no more of an outlying peak in excess deaths in 2020 than other peaks throughout the past two decades, as reported at that time. A series of CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] revisions have continually increased the number claimed dead in 2020. Even now, as of April 24, the CDC shows that 3,383,729 people died from all causes in the United States in 2020 on one page written in December 2021, [1]
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db427.pdf
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm
If even two years after the end of 2020, allegations of the number of those dead in 2020 continue to increase, at what point will that number be settled? How is it that by December 2021 an accurate number of deaths in 2020 was not available to the CDC?
In either case, mortality for 2020 (the year of COVID-19 virulence) was less than for 2021 (the year of the COVID-19 vaccine), which was 3,464,000. [2] The 2020 mortality number remained at about one percent of the total U.S. population, as in each of the previous three years, in which there was no pandemic.
Notably, December 2020 had by far the highest deaths of any month in 2020 in the United States, 32 percent higher than the average of the previous 11 months of what had been advertised to be the worst pandemic in a century, but in fact had no more than typical numbers of deaths in the U.S. during that alleged pandemic.
Data released by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development show that each of those last three weeks in December 2020, excess deaths (number of deaths over those expected) had higher excess deaths than any of the previous weeks of the alleged pandemic. [3] Each of those last three weeks of December 2020 exceeded 25,000 excess deaths per week, whereas even the worst COVID-19 hospitalization weeks, the first two weeks of April 2020, did not exceed 25,000 excess deaths per week.
The Pfizer vaccines were released to the American public on Dec. 14, 2020. [4]
As of this time, no children are known to have died in the United States with a COVID-19 diagnosis except for those having terminal leukemia and other advanced cancers and grave terminal illnesses and other non-COVID-19 life-threatening circumstances. It has been calculated that seasonal flu, lightning, and being a passenger in a motor vehicle are all more life-threatening to children and adolescents than any of the COVID-19 variants.
It may be no coincidence that December 2020 was the month that the vaccines became available to the public. Early 2021 showed striking excess deaths, and the COVID-19 vaccine was the new factor. Furthermore, January to November 2020 show an average of 274,000 deaths in the United States per month, but since December 2020, according to the same CDC tables of data, the average deaths per month jumped to 288,250.
The Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines first became available for mass vaccination in the United States on Dec. 14, 2020, followed by the Moderna vaccine a few days later. The Johnson & Johnson vaccine would not become available till Feb. 27, 2021. As soon as the earlier vaccines became distributed en masse, the total number of deaths per week for the rest of 2020 from all causes in the United States jumped from 63,000 to 84,000, which is a 32 percent increase, unlikely to be attributable to any other cause but the vaccines. Before the officially reported numbers change yet again, let’s take a screenshot from the CDC.
CDC National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics System. Monthly and 12 month-ending number of live births, deaths, and infant deaths: United States. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/p...nal-tables.htm
Notice how much higher January 2021 deaths are than for each of the next five months. Although January is typically the month with highest deaths in most years, January’s death rate was 32 percent higher than February’s.
It can be seen from the CDC data, that the deaths per week in the United States in each of the first seven weeks following the Pfizer and Moderna rollout all exceeded even the deadliest weeks of 2020 (the two weeks ending April 11 and April 18 of 2020). [5] This should be enough to make anyone hesitant about the vaccines, and logically, more fearful of the vaccines than of COVID-19.
Public Health ‘Experts’ Have Not Been Straightforward With the Data
A confounding factor for assessing safety or efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines has been a deceptive use of the word “unvaccinated” by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to not only include those who were never COVID-19-vaccinated but also those who have received a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine less than seven or 14 days ago. This “case-counting window bias” allows infections, injuries, and deaths immediately following vaccination to be assigned to, and sometimes even attributed to, the “unvaccinated” category, by deceptive sleight of hand.
Fung, Jones, et al. write of such deception: “This asymmetry, in which the case-counting window nullifies cases in the vaccinated group but not in the unvaccinated group, biases estimates.” [6] A problem with this miscategorization is that injuries and deaths have all peaked closely following COVID-19 vaccination—mostly on the first day—as in the graph below. Yet those individuals, for being so recently vaccinated, are falsely assigned the label “unvaccinated,” confounding much of the reported data.
https://openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality
The only good about this mis-categorization problem is that it is no longer such an issue now in 2023 and going forward. This deception really confounded much data in 2021, the year of peak COVID-19 vaccine uptake, and to a much lesser extent in 2022.
Now in 2023, very few individuals are still being COVID-19-vaccinated, so nearly everyone has made their decision to be vaccinated or not, more than 14 days ago, and are therefore now in widely agreed upon and accurate categories at this late time. But there is little likelihood at this point of eventual correction of previous miscategorization—and therefore corruption—of this essential public health data, 2020 through 2022.
COVID-19 Vaccines Have Negative Efficacy, and What That Means
The COVID-19 vaccines are so ineffective against COVID-19 that they have negative efficacy. This means that you have a greater likelihood of infection and/or hospitalization from COVID-19 after having received the vaccine than not receiving it. The COVID-19 vaccines have not only failed to reduce cases and hospitalizations from Omicron and COVID-19 generally, but they have actually increased the incidence of both. Results of negative efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines are seen all over the world.
Neither the Pfizer nor Moderna clinical trials addressed preventing transmission.
Tal Zaks is the chief medical officer at Moderna. He told the British Medical Journal, “Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission, because in order to do that you have to swab people twice a week for very long periods, and that becomes operationally untenable.” [7]
Dr. Larry Corey oversaw the National Institutes of Health COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. He said on Nov. 20, 2020: “The studies aren’t designed to assess transmission. They don’t ask that question, and there’s really no information on this at this point in time.” (The article where he was quoted as saying this had not been, but is now, behind a paywall.) [8]
Negative Efficacy Shown by the Most Prestigious Medical Journals
The New England Journal of Medicine shows that those who are fully vaccinated and boosted against COVID-19 recover significantly more slowly from the illness and remain contagious for longer periods of time after SARS-CoV-2 infection. [9]
From Figure 1, J Boucau and C Marino, Duration of shedding of culturable virus in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (BA.1) infection. Jun 29, 2022. N Eng J Med. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258747/
The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published data showing that persons receiving two or more doses of COVID-19 vaccines experienced more re-infections with COVID-19 than people receiving 0 to 1 dose and that the probability of reinfection increased with time. “Surprisingly, 2 or more doses of vaccine were associated with a slightly higher probability of reinfection compared with 1 dose or less.” [10]
An analysis in the British Medical Journal found a “net expected individual harm” from the COVID-19 vaccines in the context of college mandates, and calculated that “boosting young adults with BNT 162b2 [BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein] could cause 18.5 times more SAEs [significant adverse events] per million (593.5) than COVID-19 hospitalizations averted (32.0).” And “for each hospitalization averted we estimate approximately 18.5 SAEs and 1430-4626 disruptions of daily activities—that is not outweighed by a proportionate public health benefit.” [11]
Negative Efficacy of the COVID Vaccines Is Seen Throughout the World
Subramanian and Kumar examined COVID vaccination across 68 countries and found “… the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.” [12]
Switkay showed that Subramanian and Kumar’s trend line regarding relation between new COVID-19 cases and vaccination is not only positive but “… indeed, there is a very strong positive association.” [13]
H Switkay. Comment on Subramanian and Kumar… Mar 13, 2022. PDMJ. https://pdmj.org/papers/Comment_on_Subramanian_and_Kumar
A Bayesian analysis of data from 145 countries shows that the COVID-19 vaccines cause more COVID-19 cases per million and more COVID-19-associated deaths per million over the vast international scope of this study. [14] The study found “a marked increase in both COVID-19 related cases and death due directly to a vaccine deployment …” The results in the United States were 38 percent more cases per million [15] and 31 percent more deaths per million [16] caused by the COVID-19 vaccines.
Other studies found no difference in viral loads or rates of infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated. [17] [18] [19]
In order to further comprehend this vast worldwide lack of efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, let’s now look at analyses of the phenomenon of negative efficacy of the vaccines in specific countries.
A study of 51,011 employees of the Cleveland Clinic in the United States was done. It found the “Risk of COVID-19 increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received.” [20]
The following graph shows increasing cumulative incidence of COVID-19 disease starting after the first day of the Cleveland Clinic study. We can see a clear dose-dependent increase in infections made worse by each successive dose of the COVID-19 vaccines, with the unvaccinated having far less COVID-19 disease than their vaccinated co-workers.
The small print at the right says, going down from the top [in yellow] more than 3 doses. [in blue] 3 doses, [in green] 2 doses, [in red] one dose, [in black] 0 doses.
N Shrestha, P Burke, et al. Effectiveness of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) bivalent vaccine. Dec 19, 2022. “Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 [infections] for subjects stratified by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received.
Day zero was 12 September 2022, the day the bivalent vaccine began to be offered to employees. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals are jittered along the x-axis to improve visibility.”
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full.pdf
An Oxford University study of 900 hospital staff members in Vietnam showed that peak viral loads among the infected vaccinated (“breakthrough” infected) staff were 251 times higher than those of unvaccinated personnel. [21]
This Danish study [22] showed that both Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines showed negative efficacy against the Omicron variant within only 90 days of administration and that that decline in efficacy was even faster for Omicron than for the earlier Delta variant. This sharp decline is illustrated in the following graph.
C Hansen, A Schelde, et al. Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series: A Danish cohort study.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966v3.full.pdf
The above graph shows that both of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines predispose toward increased risk for Omicron infection, as the timeline passes the 90-day point, due to negative efficacy.
89.7 percent of people infected with Omicron in Denmark were either “fully vaccinated” or had their first booster. 77.9 percent of the Danish population was fully vaccinated as of the time of the study. [23] Therefore, the vaccinated have been more predisposed to Omicron infection than the unvaccinated in Denmark.
Data from the UK government, Office for National Statistics, shows that each successive vaccine dose has increased the likelihood of testing positive for the Omicron variant, in a stunning display of negative vaccine efficacy. [24]
Worse yet, risk of death from COVID-19 is shown to increase with each successive dose of vaccine for most age groups, as in the following table published by the UK government’s Health Security Agency. [25]
UK Health Security Agency. COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report. Week 9. Mar 3, 2022.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1058464/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-9.pdf
On a population-wide level in Ireland, mass vaccination is correlated in timing with dramatically rising COVID-19 cases. The Irish population has had among the highest rates of vaccine penetration in its adult population, 94.8 percent fully vaccinated as of Jan. 22, 2022, yet COVID-19 cases rose 317 percent over the previous January before the vaccines were in use. [26]
In Scotland also, among those who had received one, two, or three vaccines, or none at all, the unvaccinated had the lowest case rates in January 2022 of all four groups, as seen in this table [27] and graph. [28]
Public Health Scotland. Public Health Scotland COVID-19 & Winter Statistical Report. Jan 17, 2022. p. 38. https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/11802/22-01-19-covid19-winter_publication_report_revised.pdf
Public Health Scotland. Public Health Scotland COVID-19 & Winter Statistical Report. Jan 17, 2022. p. 40. https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/11802/22-01-19-covid19-winter_publication_report_revised.pdf
Two other very heavily vaccinated countries saw their case rates skyrocket following mass vaccination. Here are South Korea and Germany: [29]
Johns Hopkins University. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus#explore-the-global-situation
A study of 4,020 cases of Omicron in Germany on Dec. 31, 2021, showed that of those, 1,137 were boosted. There were only 1097 unvaccinated Omicron cases. [30] [31]
However, there are similar numbers of people in the three categories of “boosted,” fully vaccinated” and “unvaccinated” in Germany as of Dec. 31, 2021. German scientists studying the German government’s excess mortality data observed that the higher the vaccination rate, the higher the excess mortality. [32]
As we can see, the unvaccinated have had a strong advantage against Omicron, which was the prevalent COVID-19 strain throughout the world at that time. The COVID-19 vaccines do not work against the Delta strain either. In July 2021, in the United States, in Massachusetts, at a time and place that Delta was predominant, of a total of 469 new COVID-19 cases, 346 of those (74 percent) were in people who were partially or fully vaccinated, and 274 of the vaccinated were symptomatic. [33]
In Delhi, India, of 34 Omicron cases at a hospital, 33 were fully vaccinated (97 percent). However, India’s COVID-19 vaccination rate was only 40 percent at that time. [34]
Both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were found to plunge to negative efficacy within months. [35] [36] [37]
The Implications of Negative Efficacy in a Heavily Jabbed World
A study by Chemaitelly et al. in Qatar of over 2,000,000 people, for whom vaccination status and COVID-19 disease incidence data were available, showed, just as the preceding studies, that zero to negative efficacy was apparent within months after injection. Authors attributed that decline to “immune imprinting compromising protection in people who had the booster vaccination against the newer omicron sublineages.” The authors explain the mechanism further as [the booster] “could have trained the immune response to expect a specific narrow pre-omicron challenge; thus the response was suboptimal when the actual challenge was an immune-evasive omicron subvariant.” [38]
Original Antigenic Sin
OAS is likely exacerbated by the mistaken approach of vaccinologists, tampering with the blood, whereas the body is well-prepared to confront new microbes by way of the respiratory tract, not by way of first introduction through the blood.
If the COVID-19 vaccines merely predisposed one to higher risk of the common cold now known as the Delta and Omicron and subsequent variants, then we might simply laugh off these vaccines as a frivolous and superstitious activity. However, the safety data are nothing less than horrifying.
Reposted from Colleen Huber’s Substack.
◇ References:
[1] U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NCHS Data Brief No 427. Mortality in the United States, 2020. December 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db427.pdf
[2] U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics System. State and national provisional counts. Monthly and 12-month ending number of live births, deaths, and infant deaths: United States. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/provisional-tables.htm
[3] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Stat. Health, COVID-19 health indicators, Excess deaths per week, 2020-2023. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx
[4] BBC. COVID-19: First vaccine given in U.S. as rollout begins. Dec. 14, 2020. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55305720
[5] U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics System. State and national provisional counts. Monthly and 12-month ending number of live births, deaths, and infant deaths: United States. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/provisional-tables.htm
[6] K Fung, M Jones, et al. Sources of bias in observational studies of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness. Mar 26, 2023. J Eval in Clin Practice. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.13839
[7] P Doshi. Will COVID-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us. Oct. 21, 2020. British Medical Journal. 371. https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037
[8] A Ault. Can a COVID-19 vaccine stop the spread? Good question. Nov. 20, 2020. Medscape. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/941388
[9] J Boucau, C Marino. Duration of shedding of culturable virus in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (BA.1) infection. Jun 29, 2022. N Eng J Med. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258747/
[10] E Eythorsson, H Runolfsdottir, et al. Rate of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection during an omicron wave in Iceland. Aug. 2022. JAMA Netw Open. 5 (8). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350711/
[11] K Bardosh, A Krug, et al. COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities.Dec. 5, 2022. BMJ J Med Ethics. https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2022/12/05/jme-2022-108449
[12] S Subraminian, A Kumar. Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States. Sept. 30, 2021. Eur J Epidemio. 36 (12) 1237-1240. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/
[13] H Switkay. Comment on Subramanian and Kumar, “Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination.” Mar 13, 2022. PDMJ. https://pdmj.org/papers/Comment_on_Subramanian_and_Kumar
[14] K Beattie. Worldwide Bayesian causal impact analysis of vaccine administration on deaths and cases associated with COVID-19: A big data analysis of 145 countries. Preprint. Nov. 15, 2021. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DLlRa9rUqvW9pG1vNEsWMEydWwsmSMbe/view
[15] Ibid Beattie. p 41.
[16] Ibid Beattie. p 39.
[17] K Riemersma, B Grogan, et al. Vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals have similar viral loads in communities with a high prevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 variant. July 31, 2021. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.31.21261387v1.full.pdf
[18] C Brown, J Vostok, et al. Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infections, including COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections, associated with large public gatherings, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021. Aug 6, 2021. MMWR Morb Moral Wkly Rep. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367314/
[19] C Acharya, J Schrom, et al. No significant difference in viral load between vaccinated and unvaccinated, asymptomatic, and symptomatic groups when infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. Oct 5, 2021. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.28.21264262v2.full.pdf
[20] N Shrestha, P Burke, et al. Effectiveness of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) bivalent vaccine. Dec. 19, 2022. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full.pdf
[21] N Chau, N Ngoc. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant among vaccinated healthcare workers, Vietnam. Oct 11, 2021. The Lancet. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id=3897733
[22] C Hansen, A Schelde, et al. Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series: A Danish cohort study. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966v3.full.pdf
[23] Status of the SARS-CoV-2 variant Omicron in Denmark. COVID-19 Omicron variant report. Dec 31, 2021. Statens Serum Institut. https://files.ssi.dk/covid19/omikron/statusrapport/rapport-omikronvarianten-31122021-ct18
[24] Office for National Statistics. Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection survey, UK: Characteristics related to having an Omicron compatible result in those who test positive for COVID-19. Dec. 21, 2021. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/adhocs/14107coronaviruscovid19infectionsurveyukcharacteristicsrelatedtohavinganomicroncompatibleresultintho sewhotestpositiveforcovid19
[25] UK Health Security Agency. COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report. Week 9. Mar 3, 2022. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1058464/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-9.pdf
[26] J Horgan-Jones. The Irish Times. Jan. 22, 2022. Total of 100,000 Covid vaccines expire amid slowing demand, Ministers told. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/total-of-100-000-covid-vaccines-expire-amid-slowing-demand-ministers-told-1.4782708
[27] Public Health Scotland. Public Health Scotland COVID-19 & Winter Statistical Report. Jan. 17, 2022. p. 38. https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/11802/22-01-19-covid19-winter_publication_report_revised.pdf
[28] Ibid, Public Health Scotland. p. 40.
[29] Johns Hopkins University. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus#explore-the-global-situation
[30] Robert Koch Institut. COVID-19 in Germany. https://www.rki.de/EN/Home/homepage_node.html
[31] Wochentlicher Lagebericht des RKI zur Coronavirus-Krankheit-2019 (COVID-19) [article in German] Dec 30 2021. Robert Koch Institut. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/Wochenbericht/Wochenbericht_2021-12-30.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
[32] R Steyer, G Kappler. The higher the vaccination rate, the higher the excess mortality. Nov. 16, 2021. https://www.skirsch.com/covid/GermanAnalysis.pdf https://www.utebergner.de/cms/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/%C3%9Cbersterblichkeit-KW-36-bis-40-in-2021-003.docx
[33] G Kampf. COVID-19 stigmatizing the unvaccinated is not justified. Nov. 20, 2021. The Lancet. 398: 10314. P 1871. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02243-1/fulltext
[34] A Dutt. Out of 34 Omicron cases at Delhi hospital, 33 are fully vaccinated. The Indian Express. Dec. 23, 2021. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/out-of-34-omicron-cases-at-delhi-hospital-33-are-fully-vaccinated-7686188/
[35] C Hansen, A Schelde, et al. Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series: A Danish cohort study. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966v3.full.pdf
[36] H Tseng, B Ackerson, et al. Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against infection and COVID-19 hospitalization with SARS-CoV-2 omicron subvariants: BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5. Oct. 1, 2022. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.09.30.22280573v1.full.pdf
[37] H Tseng, B Ackerson, et al. Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against SARS-CoV-2 omicron and delta variants. Jan 8, 2022. medRxiv. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.07.22268919v1.full.pdf
[38] H Chemaitelly, H Ayoub, et al. Long-term COVID-19 booster effectiveness by infection history and clinical vulnerability and immune imprinting: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Mar 10, 2023. Lancet Infect Dis. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10079373/
[39] A Vatti, D Monsalve, et al. Original antigenic sin: A comprehensive review. September 2017. J Autoimmun. 83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0896841117302226?via%3Dihub
[40] A Schiepers, M van’t Wout, et al. Molecular fate-mapping of serum antibody responses to repeat immunization. Jan. 16, 2023. Nature. 615. 482-489. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05715-3
[41] D Burnett, R Bull. Total recall? Understanding the effect of antigenic distance on original antigenic sin. March 7, 2023. Immunol and Cell Biol. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imcb.12638
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.
CDC: Vaccinated at Higher Risk from Covid Than Unvaxxed
Frank Bergman
September 4, 2023 - 12:57 pm
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has stated that Americans who have received mRNA shots for Covid are now at a higher risk of infection from new variants of the virus than those who are unvaccinated.
The CDC quietly made the damning admission in an update on its guidance regarding newly emerging variants of Covid.
The update comes as Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration appears to be preparing to bring back Covid lockdowns, masking, and vaccine mandates as the critical 2024 approaches, despite the pandemic being over.
The health agency issued the update in response to the BA.2.86 Covid variant.
Responding to reports about the variant, the CDC published the “Risk Assessment Summary for SARS CoV-2 Sublineage BA.2.86.”
However, according to the notice, people who have been vaccinated are more likely to catch the new variant than someone who has never been vaccinated or had Covid.
It states that the new variant “may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines.”
The admission is a major blow to the “safe and effective” propagandists who pressured the public to take the shots.
The news is especially significant for those who have suffered serious side effects, or even died, from the shots.
Since the rollout of the shots, reports of sudden deaths, blood clots, heart complications, and other major complications have been soaring.
And, according to the CDC, who previously claimed that questioning the safety of the shots is “disinformation,” vaxxed Americans are now at an increased risk of infection.
Yet, despite the acknowledgment from the CDC, the federal agency is still pushing for the public to get vaccinated.
The CDC insists that the new 2024 election vaccines will definitely do their job when they’re rolled out later this month.
Study hailed as 'proof that Covid jabs killed millions' has doubt cast
A study in the prestigious British Medical Journal (BMJ) suggesting Covid vaccines drove a massive rise in deaths has been labelled with an official 'expression of concern' — casting doubt on its findings.
The report, from Dutch scientists, suggested the jab may have played a role in three million excess deaths between 2020 and 2022 — and influential vaccine sceptics, including conspiracy theorist and former radio host Alex Jones, hailed the research as 'proof the Covid jab killed millions'.
It came just weeks after the controversy-hit AstraZeneca Covid vaccine was withdrawn worldwide, amid continuing concerns it caused blood clots in rare cases.
However other experts immediately criticised the BMJ study for implying a link without providing data to back the claims.
Now the journal has slapped a formal notice on the paper, less than two weeks after it was published, amid an investigation into its legitimacy.
https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/...=634&h=542&m=6
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology in Utrecht, Netherlands, which commissioned the research, has also formally distanced itself from the findings.
A spokesman said: 'We will further investigate the scientific quality of this study. The Princess Máxima Center deeply regrets that this publication may give the impression that the importance of vaccinations is being questioned.
'Originally, the idea was to look at the effect of Covid measures on, among other things, the mortality rate of children with cancer in low-income countries.
'During the course of the study, the focus shifted and diverted in a direction that we felt was too far from our expertise.
'The Máxima Center therefore emphatically distances itself from this publication.
'If it turns out that carelessness was involved in the realisation of this publication, it will of course be withdrawn.'
The centre added that it 'strongly supports' vaccination and that its researchers 'in no way' demonstrated a link between jabs and excess deaths.
The BMJ explained that its 'expression of concern' is designed to alert readers to the fact that issues have been raised about the study. It falls short of a correction or retraction.
https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/...=634&h=930&m=6
more at link /. . .
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/hea...d29e734e9&ei=8
Study shows it is possible to 'turn off' the gene altering vax:
https://www.infowars.com/posts/mrna-...covered-study/
Quote:
Posted by Ernie Nemeth
Dr Peter McCullough says they've found the off switch for mRNA injections. What he's actually talking about is an interference with it
Alex Jones 2024-Jun-17 Monday
If this audio doesn't start at 1 hr 15 min 10 sec, go there manually
Dr. Mik-R just followed up with a study of UK data, the only such detailed dataset of all the countries.
Study looks at all-cause mortality, age groups from 18+ to 80+,compared to unvaxxed, following each of 1-4 jabs.
Starting at jab 1, all age groups got good protection from all cause mortality (perplexing, how it is about all cause), with oldest groups getting most. However, for all age groups, this protection waned, resulting in a negative efficacy, with the older age groups waning more quickly.
On each subsequent jab, iirc, same cycle but gets quicker, and the excess deaths ratio gets to be worse.
Don’t forget that the weaker folk died off earlier, across the age range.
Unvaxxed ends up being the best bet, according to the study (study is linked in the description), as many here will appreciate.
UK Mortality by Vaccination Status: Very Strong Early Protection… But What Happened Later? (#183)
Merogenomics
173K subscribers
July 5, 2025. (ETA: Originally posted May 15 on Patreon)
Quote:
We explore a large-scale real-world analysis based on UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) data (April 2021–May 2023), examining all-cause mortality by vaccination status.
The data show that the initial rollout of COVID-19 vaccines provided substantial mortality protection, especially among older populations. However, this protective effect declined over time, revealing a more nuanced picture by age group and booster status.
🔍 What you'll learn:
• Initial vaccine protection and when it peaked
• Age-stratified risk trends over time
• Booster dose impact on longevity of protection
• Patterns in non-COVID deaths
• Duration of benefit by age and dose count
This video unpacks both the benefits and complexities of long-term mortality trends post-vaccination—based solely on publicly available data.
📊 Timestamps:
00:00 – Introduction & Title
00:20 – Excess deaths Videos
04:00 – 18-39 age group mortality rate ratio by vaccine status
05:35 – 40-49 age group mortality rate ratio by vaccine status
07:30 – 50-59 age group mortality rate ratio by vaccine status
11:05 – 60-69 age group mortality rate ratio by vaccine status
14:10 – 70-79 age group mortality rate ratio by vaccine status
16:16 – 80-89 age group mortality rate ratio by vaccine status
18:55 – 90+ age group mortality rate ratio by vaccine status
22:25 – 18-39 age group standardized mortality ratio of all vaxx vs non-vaxx24:00 – 40-49 age group standardized mortality ratio of all vaxx vs non-vaxx
25:17 – 50-59 age group standardized mortality ratio of all vaxx vs non-vaxx
26:10 – 60-69 age group standardized mortality ratio of all vaxx vs non-vaxx
26:37 – 70-79 age group standardized mortality ratio of all vaxx vs non-vaxx
27:00 – 80-89 age group standardized mortality ratio of all vaxx vs non-vaxx
27:55 – 90+ age group standardized mortality ratio of all vaxx vs non-vaxx
29:55 – Non-specific vaccine effects
🧪 Study source: https://f1000research.com/articles/13...
🎥 Filming Location: Bow Summit, Alberta
https://youtube.com/watch?v=_GcDjoOdrC4[/url]