Nazis and Reptilians in Antarctica (13:18)
This is the trailer for the 2-part remote-viewing documentary conducted at Farsight. This revises the mainstream historical account of Project Highjump led by Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd, Jr.
Printable View
Nazis and Reptilians in Antarctica (13:18)
This is the trailer for the 2-part remote-viewing documentary conducted at Farsight. This revises the mainstream historical account of Project Highjump led by Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd, Jr.
Remote Viewing – Is it broken?
Daz Smith
IN 2017 I participated in an IRVA conference discussion with Pam Coronado and John Cook or the possible role of Telepathy within remote viewing.
I collected examples of RV sessions that seem to indicate that the connection and communication between Remote Viewing taskers and viewers may be more complex and intimate than previously thought. These examples generally include targets that do not physically exist, and some ONLY exist in the mind of the tasker. Yet, talented Remote Viewers can accurately describe these targets in great detail, with no discernible difference in the feel or the quality of the data in comparison to normal or actual physical targets.
This started with a 2008 HRVG experiment called Tanner Dam. In this experiment, ten remote viewers worked a remote viewing target and all described a location with people and structures in a natural environment. The problem was that the target was a mental construct of Dick Allgire (formerly of HRVG). It didn’t physically exist anywhere except his mind and imagination. Yet all viewers accurately described it and they didn’t know it was not real.
The IRVA discussion in 2017, continued this thread, we discussed other example I had collected of similar projects and experiences and also one of my own that I recently ran with a group of Facebook volunteers. I too created a fictional UFO event that only existed in my mind, ten remote viewers participated and they all to one degree or another described this fictional event.
CONTINUE: https://www.remoteviewed.com/remote-...-is-it-broken/
Transcripts of Remote Viewing sessions of Nazis and Reptilians in Antarctica
The link at the end of the post takes you to a page on the Farsight Forum where you can read the complete transcripts
Dr Courtney Brown Introduction to Nazi and Reptilian in Antarctica Part One:
Between August 26th 1946 and late February 1947, approximately one year after Germany surrendered at the close of WWII, Rear Admiral Richard Byrd led an expedition to Antarctica called Operation High Jump. Now at the time, the United States had spent a lot of money on WWII. The end of the War would normally be considered a time to close down Military activities, consolidate gains, save cash – so on. But this expedition to Antarctica involved tremendous resources. Those resources were called Task Force 468 and it involved 13 ships, 33 Aircraft and nearly 5000 men – and that included Destroyers, a Submarine, an Aircraft Carrier, Ice Breakers, a Tanker, a Supply Ships – the works.
Now the stated reason for the Task Force to Antarctica was to gather data – to explore. To see if it was possible to design Air Bases in that cold location, and that type of thing – sort of National Geographic on steroids.
CONTINUE (to transcript & comments): https://www.farsightprime.com/forums...ctica-comments
Remote Viewing US Presidential Meetings with Extraterrestrials & Secret Agreements
April 29, 2021
Michael Salla
One of the least understand processes in the modern history of UFOs are secret meetings held between US Presidents and extraterrestrial visitors, and subsequent agreements that emerged from them. A number of insiders and eyewitnesses have come forward over the years to share their knowledge of these highly classified events, which continue to remain secret to this day and are hotly disputed among UFO researchers.
To this body of testimonial evidence that such meetings and agreements did occur, we can now add recent remote viewing sessions conducted by the Farsight Institute using a scientifically rigorous protocol. The data provided by Farsight gives us an independent means of evaluating the earlier body of testimonies concerning US Presidents meeting with and striking deals with extraterrestrials. Before discussing the recent Farsight remote viewing sessions on “Presidential Meetings with Extraterrestrials,” I need to explain what was already known from multiple sources about such meetings
The first references to US presidents meeting with extraterrestrials came from a letter dated April 16, 1954, that was written by a highly respected metaphysical leader, Gerald Light, less than two months after President Eisenhower reportedly met with an extraterrestrial delegation at Edwards Air Force Base. Light’s letter described his first-hand account of the meeting and the events that transpired after a delegation of human-looking extraterrestrials arrived in a flying saucer craft.
Light described expectations that the public would be told the truth by the Eisenhower administration, but a high-level cover-up was implemented instead. Unfortunately, there was no independent corroboration of the momentous meeting that Light says he witnessed. Consequently, Light’s account was quickly dismissed, ridiculed, and forgotten by the general public.
Over the subsequent decades, anonymous whistleblowers would occasionally come forward to be interviewed by an intrepid journalist or brave UFO researchers, such as Timothy Good, who included the information in their newspaper articles or books. Good’s 1991 book, Alien Contact, was among the first to release details of the Eisenhower extraterrestrial meeting. Very few individuals were willing to go on the record and face the scrutiny, ridicule, and risks associated with going public on such a highly classified topic.
CONTINUE: https://exonews.org/remote-viewing-u...ent=FeedBurner
NB: Although I'm not a fan of Michael Salla, I must say that this is an interesting and well written article / long read.
Interesting - I have heard something similar before about "the deal" with the ETs. I don't understand how the U.S. got shafted? Seems to me that the deal just didn't go through. Sure the U.S. might have not received the tech they were expecting, but does that mean that the ETs were allowed to do what they wanted to? They would do what they want anyway I would think. So what would be the need for a deal in the first place?
Did they need permission? If permission is such a strong thing, then I would think that keeping their part of their promise (their part of the deal) to be important as well.
Moksha - Remote Viewing Freedom from Reincarnation
MOKSHA is a hindu which means: "freedom from samsara, the cycle of death and rebirth". Brett Stuart is a remote viewer. He and his colleagues (4 persons altogether) made a project to examine this "moksha" term. They ran this project blind, didn't know what the target really was. It is interesting that they don't do channeling or they don't refer to written records of any tradition. They simply use remote viewing.
Description of the target side: "fence or grid around a place, that acts as barrier, that traps people or objects". This is a checkpoint for an external force. It acts as a cage. A form of perverted injustice is occuring. A net has been spun around the planet, an operation of catch and release on a grand scale.
How does it work? earth is shielded by a compangnion object. An object, that squeezes tightly around the globe. A chemical process, that involves chemicals. There is a mechanism, at the time of death that is lensing/curving your light back down to earth. This act of lensing generates energy inside the mechanical structure.
What is happening to the soul? To the souls there is a fractioning occuring. The mind and body of a person is fractured, rendering them confused and angry. Something is being taken from them. Analogy: bees in a box, the harvest of honey. The amount of souls reincarnating on this planet, creates an instability, that adds to desired results at this harvest.
How did this begin: Long ago in the past this planet was watched by an outside force with great envy. On earth reincarnation did not exist, souls were not trapped at death and were able to leave this sphere. Then a massive war occured. The fate of earth was decided. The outside force took over. Every time someone incarnates, that what is chipped off as astral shells of the person, is like fuelwood for the system. We are one tiny piece of a power plant.
How to achieve moksha?
1. At death some specific particles become charged and create an emission. This shoots out of the being like a bullet. This occures from the center of the being. That is the soul. It is being sent to a "super highway" for the soul. The mechanical object around earth prevents the soul from reaching this highway. If you reach this highway, you're safe. In order to be free, the position in the angle whith which you exit the body is very important. A 45° degree angle is crucial.
2. There is a safety rope for you, that if you exit in a right angle, you will be helped out the rest of the way. The problem is fear. Because of the fear at death prevents most people to find the safety rope.
Why was this object created around earth? The adversaries running this system are like demons. The mayhem down here is intended, it feed the system itself.
Who is responsible? A council of organic entities, they operate from a place that freezes time. A void, black hole seems to be the place they exist in. They create void zones throughout the universe to enter our realm. The council themselves think they are gods. They are extremly service to self.
SOURCE: https://cassiopaea.org/forum/threads...rnation.45547/
VIDEO: Moksha - Remote Viewing Freedom from Reincarnation (43:49)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/K27GnPN8uCLb/
Remote Viewing Challenges Scientific Fundamentals
I’ll start this story in 1930, when Albert Einstein contributed his preface to Upton Sinclair’s Mental Radio— Upton’s published experiments in to telepathy:
"The results of the telepathic experiments carefully and plainly set forth in this book stand surely far beyond those which a nature investigator holds to be thinkable…. In no case should the psychologically interested circles pass over this book heedlessly.”
- A. Einstein.
Around that same time Einstein was coming to grips with quantum mechanics and nonlocality. Quantum nonlocality 2 indicates that things (photons, electrons, even molecules and small diamonds 3 ) separated by space and time 4 can still be linked, or entangled. Einstein was not put off by the possibility of telepathy, since —while telepathy seems to violate classical (Newtonian) mechanics— the notion of telepathy would violate no laws of quantum mechanics.
Excerpt from Mental Radio
In Mental Radio, Upton described his approximately 300 telepathy experiments. He would draw something, fold the paper closed, and ask someone else to draw it, sight unseen. His results were remarkable. (see sample at right).
Move forward about 35 years to 1970. Physicists Dr. Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ at SRI were contracted by the U.S. government from 1970 to 1995 to study psychic phenomena. (Training manuals were declassified.)SRI coined the term Remote Viewing (RV) because all previous terms (telepathy, clairvoyance, etc) all had too much baggage. RV is based on a presumption that we have a sense that can pick up a signal, but we must separate it from the noise, namely our analytical mind’s insistence on trying to name this vague, unclear perception.
CONTINUE: https://danpouliot.com/remote-viewing/remote-viewing/
NB: The article (long read) is a 'short' history of Remote Viewing, it explains the RV terminology and also is a 'Who's Who in Remote Viewing'.
Remote Viewing 101 - The Complete Lesson (1:22:47)
I have to say, this seems well worth paying attention to. I'm wondering if they got any details of a location (or even the area of the world).
What the three viewers all saw was a mushroom cloud. They share their worknotes in the second half of the short video. This is from Dick Allgire:
https://projectavalon.net/Dick_Allgire_RV_sketch.jpg
"NFE" = "Near Future Event". And here are two of the YouTube comments. (Can anyone supply any details?)Farsight Institute also saw the cloud for this month.
Kahmia Dunson over on Farsight also saw this nuke type event.
Okay, Here's Farsight, published today. Go to 9:18.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=v28tkNSKOPY
Is anyone aware of of any data compilation, which may be continuously filed away as to the accuracy rate of these remote viewers, beyond just other remote viewers who may “confirm”?
Like with the mushroom clouds supposed to happen soon, if none are spotted within say 6 months, a year or two, I would consider that a miss.
Are the hits and misses kept track of at all? This would be very useful information, so that we can grade them same as weather forecasters and such.
Well if you don't know, it's actually simple but time consuming. Given you have asked this on two threads, here is what you should do Gracy. Watch all the videos compare it to actual events and then perform basic statistical analysis to determine the probability of the prediction being by chance. Hope that helps.
Well thank you for the ringing endorsement Elaine. :) But I'm looking for a bit more than that.
Hey Savannah. Well first off I wasn't really asking a question on the predictions thread you reference, that was just me offering some observations, and the subject was a little more broad. Predictions in general, and sharing my thoughts on how many excuses are to be had when they inevitably fail.
This is specific, solely focused on remote viewing. Maybe a little background would be helpful. My interest in remote viewing used to be quite intense, for quite some time, and I've even managed to do it myself on occasion so I know it's a real thing! Thing is, over time I began noticing two things about the big names out there:
1) Many of their viewings are of situations that can never possibly be verified. For example, "looking" at the goings on with ET in far away corners of the universe, or at how the Egyptians actually built the pyramids, etc.
2) When it came to "seeing" future events, it took so long waiting for results that I invariably would wind up getting sidetracked on other things, and never know whether they ever verified or not. I don't think that's just me either. There's always a lot of hubbub when these new predictions first come out, but we all seemingly just lose track of them along the way, never finding out whether they verified or not, and soon enough it's time to get excited about the next one.
Now I, personally, have never noted much success in these prediction viewings, the ones I did keep track of anyway. And then of course there's those like Ed Dames who seem to be famous just for being famous, because his "kill shot" still hasn't happened after decades now. But he's still revered regardless.
So I got to thinking today there must be a lot of people these days here who pay much closer attention to this than me. Maybe someone out there really has kept track of results, maybe even the viewers themselves, and there's a place to see them.
So that's all, not like I'm starved for an answer, just a curiosity.
At least this mushroom cloud is supposed to be this month. That's a short window of time to find out, unless another timeline anomaly pops up by October 1 where the destruction was narrowly escaped, or more time is needed for the results to prove out (ha ha).
Could we do something here together then, along the lines that Grady May suggests? Simple spreadsheet, time and date of when prediction made, summary of it and then if and when it's fulfilled the time and date of occurrence?
Backfill where we have prior predictions, important to include hits and misses.
Could be solid evidence to encourage others to take it seriously, perhaps even save lives, also help to sort wheat from chaff. Establish which viewers have best hit rate etc. Maybe even work out margin for error and other variables?
There's so many seers and sources of info, so many upcoming conjunctions, nexus points etc. Anything we can do to clarify this must be worth considering, because you could drive yourself crazy following each and every rabbit hole (speaking from experience here :facepalm: )
Yes, that thought occurred to me too. A 'mushroom cloud' doesn't always mean an atomic explosion. For instance, this is a volcano that erupted in Ecuador back in 1999. (But it seems we may soon know)
https://live.staticflickr.com/1/83563_726ce6d8f9.jpg
One of the drawings from the viewers did appear to show the cloud in a city, for what its worth.
Also will point out they appeared to predict the New Orleans hurricane pretty accurately last month, even referencing Katrina, and it hit on the anni of Katrina and close to the same locations.