Search:

Type: Posts; User: Mark (Star Mariner); Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.04 seconds.

  1. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    I believe the two Bidens are the same. You have only to compare the general facial features at a glance - shapes of the eyes, nose, mouth, and distances between - to see the Biden on the left is the...
  2. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    I don't much hold with anecdotes. Especially ones this dubious.

    I admit, there's a strong probability the Beatles were indeed controlled, or infiltrated by design to corrupt and subvert - but not...
  3. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    Lots of clips, sequences and soundbites, with little to no context. That is entirely misleading.

    He uses this discrepancy as a foundation. That the second McCartney (from a whole decade later in...
  4. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    Agree, I don't think he would've gone along with it at all.

    Of all the Beatles, John was the most conscientious, genuine and outspoken. That's the key word. Outspoken. He couldn't and wouldn't...
  5. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    Just a question... and I'm posting this in peace. No rebuttal, no argument, we're sitting down having coffee (or for me, tea) and having a friendly chat. My question is, why/how is this still being...
  6. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    I did do some legwork on this, a while ago. It didn't take long before this 'conspiracy' fell apart.

    First a photographic analysis. primarily here, and here. Conclusion: Paul is Paul and always...
  7. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    I explained in depth in my post here why the Paul is dead is a 'junk conspiracy' like the flat earth, having quite as much evidence for it as the flat earth, i.e none AT ALL. I also demonstrated...
  8. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    I wouldn't be a bit surprised if these forces were, as you say, centrally involved with this Paul conspiracy, and many others, if not in pushing it out to sea in the first place, then keeping the...
  9. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    Some interesting photo comparisons of McCartney here, each between 1964 and 1967. Can't embed however.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp7UGzr7Z5w

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gO3OkMqdu8Q
    ...
  10. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    I was unable to discover exactly when that younger picture was taken, one reference was 1964, but I can't be certain. So more testing was required.

    I did that this afternoon with this same...
  11. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    To check again, I signed up to https://ip.rohamai.com/ face detection platform, which provides facial comparison software, text to speech, and more. Just to see what it said. I could input other...
  12. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    I found the source of that earlier 1969 picture, it's from his UK Singles Collection Album cover, 1978-1983. So I'd suspect that picture was taken somewhere inside that 5 year slot. With over a...
  13. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    Erk, I don't trust this tool. For a benchmark I tested it on John Lennon. It doesn't think it's the same person either.

    41489
  14. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    I'll have a play with that Bill, but that bottom pic supposedly from '69, are we sure? From many pics I've seen, in '69 he had a moustache, sometimes beard and sideburns. He looks considerably older...
  15. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    Something definitely weird going on, because according to this Ringo was way taller than any of them back in the day! :)
    ...
  16. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    True, but as a photographer I can say that many things do change the height and appearance of a person in a picture, like the shooting-angle (very changeable results), and the focal length, whether...
  17. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    Thanks T Smith. I have to admit I haven't read that book, and maybe I should before drawing a final conclusion. But 666 pages, hah! Yeh, so that's a coincidence...

    What a tangled web, good Lord.
  18. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    Again, this is hearsay, Bill. I won't say it's impossible, I won't say anything's impossible (yes, even that bloody Q), it's just...very difficult to parse the enormity of what would need to be...
  19. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    Never been able to get very far with this conspiracy. Yes there are interesting stories. Interesting photographs. Interesting inconsistencies. But I consider the inconsistencies in photographs I...
  20. Replies
    421
    Views
    168,701

    Re: Paul McCartney really is Dead

    Would have been an entertaining watch, had it not been for that bloody James Corden. I hear he's in America now. Thank God. For those of you across the pond...I am truly sorry (and no, we don't want...
Results 1 to 20 of 20