I believe the two Bidens are the same. You have only to compare the general facial features at a glance - shapes of the eyes, nose, mouth, and distances between - to see the Biden on the left is the...
Type: Posts; User: Mark (Star Mariner); Keyword(s):
I believe the two Bidens are the same. You have only to compare the general facial features at a glance - shapes of the eyes, nose, mouth, and distances between - to see the Biden on the left is the...
I don't much hold with anecdotes. Especially ones this dubious.
I admit, there's a strong probability the Beatles were indeed controlled, or infiltrated by design to corrupt and subvert - but not...
Lots of clips, sequences and soundbites, with little to no context. That is entirely misleading.
He uses this discrepancy as a foundation. That the second McCartney (from a whole decade later in...
Agree, I don't think he would've gone along with it at all.
Of all the Beatles, John was the most conscientious, genuine and outspoken. That's the key word. Outspoken. He couldn't and wouldn't...
Just a question... and I'm posting this in peace. No rebuttal, no argument, we're sitting down having coffee (or for me, tea) and having a friendly chat. My question is, why/how is this still being...
I did do some legwork on this, a while ago. It didn't take long before this 'conspiracy' fell apart.
First a photographic analysis. primarily here, and here. Conclusion: Paul is Paul and always...
I explained in depth in my post here why the Paul is dead is a 'junk conspiracy' like the flat earth, having quite as much evidence for it as the flat earth, i.e none AT ALL. I also demonstrated...
I wouldn't be a bit surprised if these forces were, as you say, centrally involved with this Paul conspiracy, and many others, if not in pushing it out to sea in the first place, then keeping the...
Some interesting photo comparisons of McCartney here, each between 1964 and 1967. Can't embed however.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp7UGzr7Z5w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gO3OkMqdu8Q
...
I was unable to discover exactly when that younger picture was taken, one reference was 1964, but I can't be certain. So more testing was required.
I did that this afternoon with this same...
To check again, I signed up to https://ip.rohamai.com/ face detection platform, which provides facial comparison software, text to speech, and more. Just to see what it said. I could input other...
I found the source of that earlier 1969 picture, it's from his UK Singles Collection Album cover, 1978-1983. So I'd suspect that picture was taken somewhere inside that 5 year slot. With over a...
Erk, I don't trust this tool. For a benchmark I tested it on John Lennon. It doesn't think it's the same person either.
41489
I'll have a play with that Bill, but that bottom pic supposedly from '69, are we sure? From many pics I've seen, in '69 he had a moustache, sometimes beard and sideburns. He looks considerably older...
Something definitely weird going on, because according to this Ringo was way taller than any of them back in the day! :)
...
True, but as a photographer I can say that many things do change the height and appearance of a person in a picture, like the shooting-angle (very changeable results), and the focal length, whether...
Thanks T Smith. I have to admit I haven't read that book, and maybe I should before drawing a final conclusion. But 666 pages, hah! Yeh, so that's a coincidence...
What a tangled web, good Lord.
Again, this is hearsay, Bill. I won't say it's impossible, I won't say anything's impossible (yes, even that bloody Q), it's just...very difficult to parse the enormity of what would need to be...
Never been able to get very far with this conspiracy. Yes there are interesting stories. Interesting photographs. Interesting inconsistencies. But I consider the inconsistencies in photographs I...
Would have been an entertaining watch, had it not been for that bloody James Corden. I hear he's in America now. Thank God. For those of you across the pond...I am truly sorry (and no, we don't want...