Search:

See my post here ...

Sarah Bajc in the news again ... (more pieces of the puzzle?)


Uncorrected translation by Google ( sorry, no time)
...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N844AA

http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/3201872/

http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/91406-727-stolen-angola-11.html
...

Very good point ... but what if there was a plan to crash the plane producing the evidence of non-surviving passengers
and somebody intervened? I think that the main reason we don't understand the...

That also touches once again on one of my main questions "What is globally so threatening that countries/governments even
keep their mouth shut about the public 'secrets' of their alleged...

You mean like I suggested in this post (about Titanic) ?

I understand the goal you describe, it must something like that. But somehow it doesn't make completely sense to have a
stand in plane while you just hijacked one ....

No there isn't ... my predictions are still correct that they will find the pinger at the very last moment taking that as identification of the plane.
Two more remarks they made that support my gut...

I sometimes ask myself:
Suppose the plane was taken over (remotely) ... what would you do to get control back?
Or what would an expert/pilot do? And what could he still do if there is no more...

Why is this info popping up (inserted?) so late in the unfolding drama? :confused:
A pilot should know he's moving way too fast, they would need to be at low altitude and besides wouldn't a plane...

Ok, just what I expected ... even at the deepest possible point, what a coincidence. :eyebrows:

But wait ... that's not too deep !

Remember this ?
...

Orion P3's can drop off several buoys to faster determine an area of interest from a wider
range and direct other vessels toward it. I still makes no sense why they didn't do this
much sooner after...

Hmm, could there be a same kind of changeover plan like between the Titanic and Olympic?
Why was a fairly new plane planned to be taken apart? Was it damaged?

Bill, your 'Back to TOPIC' sign prompts me to make this statement once again ...

Although I myself also contribute getting some of the technical details right it is exactly what they are doing on...

I checked that weeks ago ... according to the original 777-200 specs the runway is long enough.
But they land B-52's there too (they probably do not need their extra braking chute)
...

Not correct either ... those are not registration numbers but country determined call signs ...
http://www.arrl.org/international-call-sign-series

9M-MRO belongs to Malaysia
N105GT belongs to...

Not correct either ... those are not registration numbers but country determined call signs ...
http://www.arrl.org/international-call-sign-series

9M-MRO belongs to Malaysia
N105GT belongs to...

Not correct either ... those are not registration numbers but country determined call signs ...
http://www.arrl.org/international-call-sign-series

9M-MRO belongs to Malaysia
N105GT belongs to...

[/QUOTE]


Oops! 30 days are up now and can't hear the pings any more! Time to get back to the drawing board to craft up another lie to string people along!

Missing Malaysia Airlines...

[/QUOTE]

Yes, he just has to say they found the pinger and identified the plane ... there's nobody to verify it :p case closed ... :(