Search:

I don't think we know that though. Even structural engineers with PhDs can't say they know that, not for absolute certain. That would require high resolution data, obtained only by an exact...

I sort of agree, on initial inspection. Aluminium versus steel should not do this amount of damage. But...neither should a speck of dust versus a window, but propelled with enough velocity it would...

Not in the slightest, and I hope my initial and equal frankness was not likewise received.

I am by no professing any sort of expertise on this, or really any matters -- just a point of...

The statement was made merely as a truism, not any kind of proclamation, so chill :sunrise:

I did at the time give close consideration to the no planes theory, and I watched and studied September...

You're free to disagree of course, no one is denying you that right, but that doesn't change the well-established fraudulent nature of these clips. Many of us have picked over them on this forum,...

One to add off the top of my head: a genuine Boeing 757, or Boeing 767, cannot fly at 400mph+ at sea level. Attempting to do so, in such dense air, would result in structural failure of the aircraft....

These are both wrong and have been debunked. The first one, when the plane appears to fly behind a building, is addressed and disproven here at 11.50 is this vid from Rich Planet.

And the "no...