Search:

unfortunately this is the realm that we are regulated to.... strong logical conclusions based on substantive "collateral" evidence with a heavy skew to the sources that are the "least" connected.
...

in my estimation it's clearly big enough, the volume of matter missing from the site is explained by the dust cloud... if the debris were NOT missing I'd wonder where the hell that dust cloud came...

Or Hutchison.... I'll have to look more into this hutchison effect (high frequency resonance destabilization)... very interesting.

I'm going to flip my position back to maybe thinking about...

I'm not very deep into the Dr Wood material, how does she account for the explosions?

That 11 story building I posted a "controlled demo" video of left a pile almost 2 stories high.... extrapolate that to 110 stories and 20 sounds pretty damn close to me ;)



110 stories is not...

well, copper (like most metals) work hardens & putting current through a line heats (which expands the metal) more during peek useage and less in the middle of the night (when it is also generally...

Well, dust samples that where collected at the scene contained nano particles of molten metal, which is a smoking gun for the
presence of thermite.
a source

Maybe she makes a better case for...

It actually was coming out of (just one side) of the building for HOURS before it WTC1 fell, just a constant huge cloud of dust for hours from every single inch of 110 stories (ground to top...

Perhaps both were used? Maybe this was the first large scale use and contingencies were put in place... OR maybe termite WAS used specifically to catch up the "alt media" & misdirect... who knows?
...

That's kind of exactly the point of what they are saying.... that the buildings turned to dust.

there's some pretty good little video clips in this presentation of what we are told are steel beams...