The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

[RunningDeer]

CASTLE ROCK (34 min)

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/g25Sdnrzescj



1900 OR THE LAST PRESIDENT (INGERSOLL LOCKWOOD) (1:12:12)

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/uwjGcFhB31SX

[mojo]

Warning, imagine this is ok to watch on Youtube . But when watching it it only strengthened my resolve... Can you hear the unity?...
but also the reason why we need to continue on...

edit warning: the host uses bad language towards the end. Can you imagine if we turned the conversation on Democrats? How long would youtube keep it public?


How is this evil man still free?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=dPimd9W0jnE

[Savannah]

https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/...-election-1876


His Fraudulency: Rutherford B. Hayes and the Contested Presidential Election of 1876

Unsurprisingly, the electoral commission split down party lines—all eight Republicans said Hayes deserved the votes in all the disputed states, and all seven Democrats voted against him. The majority won, and because of the Compromise, the Democratic Party stopped contesting the results. Rutherford B. Hayes was privately sworn in as the 19th President of the United States on March 3, 1877, and publicly on Monday, March 5.

[Satori]

Posted by Savannah (here)
https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/...-election-1876


His Fraudulency: Rutherford B. Hayes and the Contested Presidential Election of 1876

Unsurprisingly, the electoral commission split down party lines—all eight Republicans said Hayes deserved the votes in all the disputed states, and all seven Democrats voted against him. The majority won, and because of the Compromise, the Democratic Party stopped contesting the results. Rutherford B. Hayes was privately sworn in as the 19th President of the United States on March 3, 1877, and publicly on Monday, March 5.

Can you help us understand the significance of this post? In 1877 Inauguration Day was March 4th. It was changed to January 20th circa 1930 by constitutional amendment.

Is there some significance to March 3rd (private) and March 5th (public) versus March 4th?

[RunningDeer]

Video removed - see Satori and mojo’s posts for an explanation about the And We Know production.

[Ratszinger]

Somethings to ponder about this Brief Moment In Time w/ 2 Presidents"

[Satori]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)

”As We Know” covers six ways from Sunday as to how we’re watching a movie production and how the evil establishments are being taken down. One example is the discrepancy of the real time Biden swearing in versus a staged production with actors and how the skies don’t match.

It’s not his first video on the topic. Here’s the Bitchute account.

THE MOVIE...THE FINAL ACT! SATANIC STRONGHOLDS ARE BEING DEMOLISHED

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/7fTntV4alDEI

Beginning at 7:29 the speaker claims that Harris did not place her hand on the Bible and shows a photo of a black book between Harris’ hand and the formal or official Bible. He says satanist do not like putting their hand on the Bible. This, after showing Biden with his hand on the official Bible.

G-d knows I’m no fan of Biden or Harris. But I am a fan of truth and accuracy.

This photo used in this video of Harris is misleading. Other photos taken at a different angle or perspective show that the black book has the words “Holy Bible” on the binder. Thus, Harris in a sense has her hand on two Bibles.

Since the speaker earlier in the video welcomes being politely corrected, I am doing so for the benefit of this forum.

I stopped watching the video at that point where he showed the Harris photo and made that statement.

[anandacate]

It's pretty wild, and I know nothing about the person in the video below, but here is what a trusted friend of mine had to say about it:

First, a 73-minute RIVETING/Exciting Video . . and PLEASE, HEAR ME Completely Out on this and give it a chance:

a. Not only is this a Early/Major "Disclosure" Public Download (of What's Going On and What's Coming . . as in, Take down/Fall of the Cabal . . and transforming the Earth with new technologies . . etc)

b. If I understand this correctly, the guy presenting, is "The Bull Guy" (he calls himself "Captain America" - and that he's a Navy Seal/Special Ops Guy. and part of "The Plan" Team) . . that was the guy covered by MSM, as the "Wacko/Looney Trump Supporter," that was part of the "Storming of the Capital" . . AS IN . . They (White Hats) Got MSM to give him Nationwide Exposure, before the White Hats put out this video . . Abso-f****n-lutely BRILLIANT !!! . . The DS/MSM have GOT to be ****tin' their pants right now . . Obviously, that's part of "The Plan"

Buffalo Horn guy from Capitol Riot reveals as Military Special Ops


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/eyojuzOeZ2T2

[mojo]

Hi Satori,

Beginning at 7:29 the speaker claims that Harris did not place her hand on the Bible and shows a photo of a black book between Harris’ hand and the formal or official Bible. He says satanist do not like putting their hand on the Bible. This, after showing Biden with his hand on the official Bible.

G-d knows I’m no fan of Biden or Harris. But I am a fan of truth and accuracy.

Right on! I say this because I personally sent a letter to And We Know about this very issue. I felt that channel owner LT was being fed false info ie a fake. I was really happy to see LT explain this in his latest video posted above. Along with the explanation I was shocked to see the proof of the staged inauguration. So again Satori great insight to see this...

[araucaria]

Posted by Satori (here)
Thus, Harris in a sense has her hand on two Bibles.

I am totally with you Satori my friend, but at the same time this idea of two Bibles in itself strikes me as highly problematic. See this post on the issue of doubles.
If you apply this to the Bible, which is supposedly The One Book like no other, then might you not also apply it to God? There is only one God, but actually…. there are TWO ‘only one Gods’. Which is a definition of Satanism.

I am reminded of CS Lewis’s Space Trilogy books and how a non-Christian who is lukewarm but nonetheless caught up in the ‘scientific nihilism’ of Satanism, suddenly decides to make a stand when he is ordered to stamp on a crucifix, and refuses to comply. If these people truly have the scientific aims and methods they claim, then why on earth do they require me to stamp on a symbol that means nothing to me and should mean nothing to them? In other words, desecration ought to be meaningless for these people.

What you – possibly – have here is the exact reverse: a Satanist who is required to swear on the Bible and finds the only way possible to ‘make a stand’ is to double up. You may think this is enough for compliance with the Christian/constitutional ritual. Some others may think this is enough to point to Satanism. A third opinion might suggest that such sitting on the fence is a defeat for Satanism: she really should have stamped on the Holy Book.

I don’t know what this video says about Biden’s oath, but I know the following from hearsay. On French primetime TV last night, he was described as having sworn on a Douai Bible. There was a report from the town of Douai, in northern France, explaining how Douai College was a seminary where priests were trained in Elizabethan times to risk their lives preaching in England. My addition to this primetime info: people like the Jesuits Edmund Campion or Robert Southwell gave their lives for the Catholic faith. This was in Shakespearean times, Southwell was family, so the place to go for further details is the Shakespeare thread, here.
Douai college also produced an English translation of the Bible to compete with the King James English Bible to which Shakespeare contributed two words (spear and shake).

So the superposition of the two bibles may also be making an interdenominational point. Biden is Catholic, and possibly seeking to cash in on the aura of the last Catholic president, JFK.

[Phoenix1304]

I saw this today, from Jan 17th, Juan O Savin saying that Biden would be inaugurated and a 40-60 day period of hidden activity that catches all the bad guys in a colossal trap. Wouldn’t that be nice? Apologies if this has already been posted here...

I can’t listen to Parkes or Ward saying the same thing probably, but I listened to the end of this and found it very soothing to my hopium withdrawal... 😉

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ae2IoZcUfJQ

[mojo]

Lin Wood crashes phone conference....

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=GO_3PqokHME

video description:
Attorney L. Lin Wood inserts himself without invitation into a private conference call at Mercer University where the legal dept. are discussing how to remove his name forever, despite Wood donating $1M to the university...Wood also catches them making defamatory comments about him without any evidence - accusations he debunks on the call, one by one. This secret recording reveals how politicized the legal profession and higher education has become. This conversation should also be required listening for every law student, but more than that...it's about Freedom Of Speech that relates to everyone.

NB: Around the 12 minute mark, to the shock of the entire legal faculty and the law students on the call, Lin Wood reveals he has been secretly listening in all along and has been recording their defamatory comments about him!

Lin Wood: "I learned today that my alma mater Mercer Law School was holding a Zoom conference call with faculty and students to discuss demands that my name be removed from a courtroom in the school. The school named the courtroom for me after I made a $1M donation to the school. I did not seek the recognition. I joined the call unbeknownst to the Dean, Cathy Cox. After she falsely slandered me, including references to my relationship with my children, I spoke up. I spoke truth. Judge for yourself after listening to my remarks."

[meat suit]

Posted by anandacate (here)
It's pretty wild, and I know nothing about the person in the video below, but here is what a trusted friend of mine had to say about it:

First, a 73-minute RIVETING/Exciting Video . . and PLEASE, HEAR ME Completely Out on this and give it a chance:

a. Not only is this a Early/Major "Disclosure" Public Download (of What's Going On and What's Coming . . as in, Take down/Fall of the Cabal . . and transforming the Earth with new technologies . . etc)

b. If I understand this correctly, the guy presenting, is "The Bull Guy" (he calls himself "Captain America" - and that he's a Navy Seal/Special Ops Guy. and part of "The Plan" Team) . . that was the guy covered by MSM, as the "Wacko/Looney Trump Supporter," that was part of the "Storming of the Capital" . . AS IN . . They (White Hats) Got MSM to give him Nationwide Exposure, before the White Hats put out this video . . Abso-f****n-lutely BRILLIANT !!! . . The DS/MSM have GOT to be ****tin' their pants right now . . Obviously, that's part of "The Plan"

Buffalo Horn guy from Capitol Riot reveals as Military Special Ops


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/eyojuzOeZ2T2

yeah, this is great.. what a hopium fix. such fun watch this and cheer yourselves up..

[Savannah]

Posted by Satori (here)

Posted by Savannah (here)
https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/...-election-1876


His Fraudulency: Rutherford B. Hayes and the Contested Presidential Election of 1876

Unsurprisingly, the electoral commission split down party lines—all eight Republicans said Hayes deserved the votes in all the disputed states, and all seven Democrats voted against him. The majority won, and because of the Compromise, the Democratic Party stopped contesting the results. Rutherford B. Hayes was privately sworn in as the 19th President of the United States on March 3, 1877, and publicly on Monday, March 5.

Can you help us understand the significance of this post? In 1877 Inauguration Day was March 4th. It was changed to January 20th circa 1930 by constitutional amendment.

Is there some significance to March 3rd (private) and March 5th (public) versus March 4th?

Thanks for the correction.

[Satori]

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by Satori (here)
Thus, Harris in a sense has her hand on two Bibles.

I am totally with you Satori my friend, but at the same time this idea of two Bibles in itself strikes me as highly problematic. See this post on the issue of doubles.
If you apply this to the Bible, which is supposedly The One Book like no other, then might you not also apply it to God? There is only one God, but actually…. there are TWO ‘only one Gods’. Which is a definition of Satanism.

I am reminded of CS Lewis’s Space Trilogy books and how a non-Christian who is lukewarm but nonetheless caught up in the ‘scientific nihilism’ of Satanism, suddenly decides to make a stand when he is ordered to stamp on a crucifix, and refuses to comply. If these people truly have the scientific aims and methods they claim, then why on earth do they require me to stamp on a symbol that means nothing to me and should mean nothing to them? In other words, desecration ought to be meaningless for these people.

What you – possibly – have here is the exact reverse: a Satanist who is required to swear on the Bible and finds the only way possible to ‘make a stand’ is to double up. You may think this is enough for compliance with the Christian/constitutional ritual. Some others may think this is enough to point to Satanism. A third opinion might suggest that such sitting on the fence is a defeat for Satanism: she really should have stamped on the Holy Book.

I don’t know what this video says about Biden’s oath, but I know the following from hearsay. On French primetime TV last night, he was described as having sworn on a Douai Bible. There was a report from the town of Douai, in northern France, explaining how Douai College was a seminary where priests were trained in Elizabethan times to risk their lives preaching in England. My addition to this primetime info: people like the Jesuits Edmund Campion or Robert Southwell gave their lives for the Catholic faith. This was in Shakespearean times, Southwell was family, so the place to go for further details is the Shakespeare thread, here.
Douai college also produced an English translation of the Bible to compete with the King James English Bible to which Shakespeare contributed two words (spear and shake).

So the superposition of the two bibles may also be making an interdenominational point. Biden is Catholic, and possibly seeking to cash in on the aura of the last Catholic president, JFK.

I like the way you think araucaria. Always have, even when I did not fully understand or grasp what you were saying or could not repeat it in any detail even when I did. (On the latter point, I usually follow your thinking and analyses when reading your posts, but I’d flub it on occasion if I tried to convey it to someone else.)

I too found it interesting, if not odd, that she had two Bibles. The double cross, most of us are familiar with. The double Bible? Hmmmm. Seems like a negative. Was she negating the Bible?

I chalked it up to a desire on her part to involve her personal Bible in the process. I even wondered if other VPs had done that in the past.

None of us know what was between the pages of the black binder she placed her hand on, as opposed to simply placing her hand on the “ceremonial Bible” (my term for convenience), as most others who came before her did. Was it a Bible? Was it something else? Why did she do that, especially given the totality of circumstances surrounding the election and inauguration?

The basic, somewhat mundane point of my post was to address the claim that Harris did not put her hand on “the” Bible, which would be true if “the” Bible is the ceremonial Bible. But it is not true that she did not put her hand on “a” Bible. At least, from other photos I looked at, it was quite clear the black book said “Holy Bible”.

Again, do we really know it was a Bible? But then, do we really know the ceremonial Bible we saw is a Bible? I don’t. And, by the way, I have no trouble with the notion Harris is not a good and trustworthy person, Satanic or not.

Double Bible. Double cross. Interesting.

[One]

This one also quite uplifting from the 21st.
The Show Must Go On! (Keep the Faith) with Jen, Magenta and Charlie (Freak)
https://rumble.com/vd4645-the-show-m...d-charlie.html

[Satori]

Posted by Satori (here)

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by Satori (here)
Thus, Harris in a sense has her hand on two Bibles.

I am totally with you Satori my friend, but at the same time this idea of two Bibles in itself strikes me as highly problematic. See this post on the issue of doubles.
If you apply this to the Bible, which is supposedly The One Book like no other, then might you not also apply it to God? There is only one God, but actually…. there are TWO ‘only one Gods’. Which is a definition of Satanism.

I am reminded of CS Lewis’s Space Trilogy books and how a non-Christian who is lukewarm but nonetheless caught up in the ‘scientific nihilism’ of Satanism, suddenly decides to make a stand when he is ordered to stamp on a crucifix, and refuses to comply. If these people truly have the scientific aims and methods they claim, then why on earth do they require me to stamp on a symbol that means nothing to me and should mean nothing to them? In other words, desecration ought to be meaningless for these people.

What you – possibly – have here is the exact reverse: a Satanist who is required to swear on the Bible and finds the only way possible to ‘make a stand’ is to double up. You may think this is enough for compliance with the Christian/constitutional ritual. Some others may think this is enough to point to Satanism. A third opinion might suggest that such sitting on the fence is a defeat for Satanism: she really should have stamped on the Holy Book.

I don’t know what this video says about Biden’s oath, but I know the following from hearsay. On French primetime TV last night, he was described as having sworn on a Douai Bible. There was a report from the town of Douai, in northern France, explaining how Douai College was a seminary where priests were trained in Elizabethan times to risk their lives preaching in England. My addition to this primetime info: people like the Jesuits Edmund Campion or Robert Southwell gave their lives for the Catholic faith. This was in Shakespearean times, Southwell was family, so the place to go for further details is the Shakespeare thread, here.
Douai college also produced an English translation of the Bible to compete with the King James English Bible to which Shakespeare contributed two words (spear and shake).

So the superposition of the two bibles may also be making an interdenominational point. Biden is Catholic, and possibly seeking to cash in on the aura of the last Catholic president, JFK.

I like the way you think araucaria. Always have, even when I did not fully understand or grasp what you were saying or could not repeat it in any detail even when I did. (On the latter point, I usually follow your thinking and analyses when reading your posts, but I’d flub it on occasion if I tried to convey it to someone else.)

I too found it interesting, if not odd, that she had two Bibles. The double cross, most of us are familiar with. The double Bible? Hmmmm. Seems like a negative. Was she negating the Bible?

I chalked it up to a desire on her part to involve her personal Bible in the process. I even wondered if other VPs had done that in the past.

None of us know what was between the pages of the black binder she placed her hand on, as opposed to simply placing her hand on the “ceremonial Bible” (my term for convenience), as most others who came before her did. Was it a Bible? Was it something else? Why did she do that, especially given the totality of circumstances surrounding the election and inauguration?

The basic, somewhat mundane point of my post was to address the claim that Harris did not put her hand on “the” Bible, which would be true if “the” Bible is the ceremonial Bible. But it is not true that she did not put her hand on “a” Bible. At least, from other photos I looked at, it was quite clear the black book said “Holy Bible”.

Again, do we really know it was a Bible? But then, do we really know the ceremonial Bible we saw is a Bible? I don’t. And, by the way, I have no trouble with the notion Harris is not a good and trustworthy person, Satanic or not.

Double Bible. Double cross. Interesting.

I went back and looked at the Bible’s Harris used when she was “sworn” in as the putative VP and drilled down a little further on the subject.

Harris did indeed use two Bibles. But she did not use the “ceremonial Bible” as was customary. Rather, we are told she used a Bible that once belonged to US Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, which was brown and underneath the black Bible. It turns out, we are told, that the black Bible is not Harris’ Bible, but that of a friend, Regina Shelton.

Marshall, it is said, inspired Harris’ career path and Shelton was like a second mother to Harris and her sister.

Apparently Harris owns no Bible, or if she does, she wanted to acknowledge these two people by using their Bibles.

I don’t know and I’m not spending anymore time on it. But I did want to be as accurate as I can be given available information.

[Delight]

Posted by TomKat (here)

Posted by Jayke (here)
“The Plan” is simple: build.

-Build our families
-Build our churches
-Build our local communities
-Build our own internet
-Build our own economy
-Build around the communist culture until it inevitably collapses and we are all that is left standing

Reform your heart, reform your mind, reform the world.

In other words, there IS no plan...

I am certain that a deep disappointment in hopium is a catalyst to reform-ation. Who cares to continue to spin out in all lateral directions seeking confirmation of a pet theory will find it. I agree that we will build according to our POV. What we most believe will be expected and we will have that vision. This is the strange underpinning to our perceived reality.

Disappointment that is deep and betrayal felt can be that last vestige of faith in a system that everyone keeps trying to agree upon. I would never vote for Trump or Biden or any politician becase I don't believe in politics as a vehicle for what I think is truer than the hope someone "good" will take charge of everything. That is a POV of being matter changing matter. The people agree they are "voters" and have identities and a function... or whatever system one takes as the description of our innate condition.

everyone talks about the role of hormones of stress. Stress makes us unable to relax and we feel stuck in "what is" We can see what is "wrong" but unless we DO something to master our body response, we are repeating patterns. Revising our internal world POV is a huge way to forget and forgive the past. Recognize the addiction to the hormones of stress and learn to rise above states of mind no longer serving the path.

We have to go vertical and meet the source of creation. That is a new journey! Consciousness is our essential state and that is IMO fact with implictaions....

The vehicle of practical consciousness that IMO can work and does work is recognizing our essential function of belief as the cause of our reality. This will take some different kinds of work. For instance maybe we must learn to FORGET the system. We need to have faith in our own power of mind to RE-VISE, Re- Form the projections of our mind and see it onto matter.

Don't scoff at your betrayal and move on to a different version of the horizontal matrix (shattered in a zillion pieces) but go VERTICAL to the field in which all manifested exists. Everything possible to imagine already "IS" and can become "real"by our very attention with deep feeling of certainty. IMO knowing there is a Living Intelligent Infinity and having a relationship gives us EVERYTHING we will choose. Dare to imprint what you would like to see:
Build new kinds of thoughts
Build my connection with the Living God
Build friendship

[TomKat]

Posted by Jayke (here)

Posted by TomKat (here)

Posted by Jayke (here)
“The Plan” is simple: build.

-Build our families
-Build our churches
-Build our local communities
-Build our own internet
-Build our own economy
-Build around the communist culture until it inevitably collapses and we are all that is left standing

Reform your heart, reform your mind, reform the world.

In other words, there IS no plan...

Only in YOUR words TomKat. Feel free to believe or say what you like, it’s not like I’ve ever seen you say anything constructive on any thread, ever. If you interpret build as ‘do nothing’ then maybe you’re the one in the grip of a passivity psy-op. What is it you’re doing on a personal level to help usher in a better future? You got any community projects or great works under construction that people might find valuable? Maybe you’d like to take the helm of the Q community and dazzle everyone with your brilliant strategic planning. We’re open to ideas if you’ve got anything useful to contribute?

This new plan doesn't sound anything like the old plan we were told to trust. Sounds a lot like Q is throwing it back on us. Just saying...

[Matthew]

Posted by Jayke (here)
Andrew Torba describes “The Plan” for the Q community moving forward:

https://gab.com/a/posts/105604642980951092

Andrew Torba ✝️
Andrew Torba ✝️
@a
·
“The Plan” is simple: build.

-Build our families
-Build our churches
-Build our local communities
-Build our own internet
-Build our own economy
-Build around the communist culture until it inevitably collapses and we are all that is left standing

Reform your heart, reform your mind, reform the world.

https://gab.com/a/posts/105604678110208882

Andrew Torba ✝️
Andrew Torba ✝️
@a
·
In order to build something “back better” it must be built on a better foundation than before. The globalists want to rebuild on a weak foundation of sand: critical theory, racial conflict, crony capitalism, political corruption, godless nihilist consumerism, etc. We need to build back on the foundation of Christ, family values, life, and fellowship. That’s how we will build back much better than ever before as we watch their foundation of sand collapse on itself.

I thought I recognised a lot of that list. Torba's five years ahead of most. I'm using his browser, Disscenter. You can't send Andrew Torba money other than cheque or bitcoin (or cash I guess). There is an E-Cheque but that's an American to American payment system, not international. They use their own servers on Gab, since they have already had to deal with what happened to Parler recently, but five years ago. Now they have already evolved. Gab is the main show, but there's GabTV, the browser and possibly a few other things. The building their own internet sounds like a joke, but uh uh, ain't no joke. Free speech baby