The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

[Valerie Villars]

I thought the same thing endina "brilliant......absolutely brilliant".

[KiwiElf]

Posted by edina (here)

Posted by mojo (here)
The Qanon site is down...hmmm lots of attacks even the new york times attacks now...

Uncanny timing

The patriots fight board is still up, https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#122

It's a good time to remember to download the most recent pdf to keep posts archived offline.

http://irc.qclearancearchive.net/02....%20-%20X.I.pdf

https://qanonposts.com/ still working

Thanks edina,

Just surfacing here; will have the new drops up shortly. (Brilliant reply btw -)

[Joe from the Carolinas]

mod hat on

I am seeing some fairly unsettling back-and-forth in this thread that is focused on the person behind the avatar, rather than an intellectual or analysis based discussion of the subject of the original post in this thread. Simply put, the Avalon community is better than at-the-human attacks.

While I understand that it is important to use the word "YOU" from time to time, I think things need to be a bit re-focused back onto the original subject of this thread, rather than attacking or challenging forum members that wish to post their views in this thread.

As a reminder, the subject of this thread is: "The Qanon posts, and a “Very Bad Day” Scenario - for some elite swamp critters (Nov 2017 and beyond)"

The subject of this thread is NOT "Attacking people that disagree about the interpretation, analysis, or anything associated with The Qanon posts".

Can we please observe more discussion and appropriate debate, rather than emotion-laden argumentation and ad hominems?

We do have a post report function, and unfortunately moderators do need to respond when things begin to veer off track.

Thanks in advance,
Your Project Avalon Moderation Team *mod hat off*

[norman]

Posted by Oddball (here)
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/u...stigation.html

Jerome Corsi, a conspiracy theorist and political commentator with connections to the former Trump adviser Roger J. Stone Jr., has been subpoenaed to testify on Friday before the grand jury in the special counsel investigation into Russia’s election interference and whether Trump associates conspired with the effort, his lawyer said on Wednesday.

The lawyer, David Gray, said that he anticipates that investigators for the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, plan to ask Mr. Corsi about his discussions with Mr. Stone, who appeared to publicly predict in 2016 that WikiLeaks planned to publish material damaging to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Even though I loathe to post anything from the NY times as a source, I have to wonder if this is part of the Pain? Or maybe if its part of the Plan?

I don't really know what Corsi could know about anything. The guy is anti-Q though. Is Mueller just grasping at straws now?

I'm not so sure Corsi is anti Q. Corsi was working with Alex Jones as his Washinton man on the ground. When Alex decided Q was having a go at him and declared Q to be a distraction, I think Alex insisted that Corsi drop all the Q talk, or else.


Corsi tried, but in the end, I think the relationship between Corsi and Alex was what broke.

[KiwiElf]

Latest "Q" posts, #2075 - 2085 - click to enlarge images or go directly to link below. NOTE: Numbering sequence differs; these are coming from: https://qanonposts.com/ . #2075 repeated on this post was #2085 in previous - KE

https://qanonposts.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------
2075 - was #2085

Sep 04 2018 22:15:51
Anonymous
2881180
>>2881001
17 yard line!?!

Sep 04 2018 22:47:28
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
2881670
>>2881180
What are the odds of that?
They never thought she would lose.
Q
------------------------------------------------------------------
2076

Sep 05 2018 11:34:26
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
186
Dl8fQTCW4AArdi1.jpg


https://vault.fbi.gov/uranium-one-tr...-01-of-01/view
[Letter from Committee on Financial Services]
Maxine Waters, California, Ranking Member
https://financialservices.house.gov/about/members.htm
How do you obstruct oversight?
How do you obtain 'inside knowledge' to closed door 'financial' investigations?
Maxine Waters, California, Ranking Member
Those who are the loudest….
Have the most to FEAR [hide]?
http://video.foxnews.com/v/549362253...#sp=show-clips
Money talks.
Q
------------------------------------------------------------------
2077

Sep 04 2018 12:54:49
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
177
Ex 1 - 'Being Afraid'
Does HRC care about you?
If she cared about protecting you…
Would she sell out America’s secrets and Uranium to China/Russia [Ex 1]?
They always thought if charges were brought [v. them] they would ultimately be safe [SC control].
[AS] out
[HRC] appointment(s) >>
End of all ends.
Final.
Did Anthony Kennedy have a choice?
Was this the original plan according to HRC election win?
What evidence was he shown?
RBG replacement [lifetime appointment - age]?
What’s at STAKE?
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...11901671858176
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...11904691691521
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...11905912287232
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...11908395249664
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...11909779431424
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...11911008313345
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...11912195362816
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...11913277485057
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...11914766450689
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...11916158910464
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...66970170769408
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...66972146233344
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...66973408780289
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...66975455592448
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...66976613216258
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...66977959616512
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...66979460976640
Pain comes in many different forms.
Full control.
Enjoy the show.
Q

Sep 05 2018 11:50:19
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
187
>>177
Ex 2 - "Being Afraid"
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...35127947468800
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...35130468233216
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...35133966221315
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...35137695002624
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...35141369217026
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...35145173475328
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...35147719401472
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...35151016140800
WITCH HUNT.
Q
------------------------------------------------------------------
2078

Sep 05 2018 11:52:39
Anonymous
2887228
ClipboardImage.png


Wait…wut?
…you're telling me Q just posted again.
Bu-bu-but Micro told me he was ending the LARP.
I feel so used….so ass-****ed (wipes tears)

Sep 05 2018 12:39:27
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
2887813
>>2887228
Ask yourself a (simple) logical question…
Why are the majority of 'Q' attacks by "PRO_MAGA" supporters coming from AJ [MOS backed] and/or AJ known associates?
Why are we a threat to them?
Why not simply publish an original picture +/- 1,2,3 secs to establish credibility?
Why was this done in the past?
We knew this type of "attack" was coming.
PREDICTABLE.
FAKE NEWS.
ATTACKS WILL ONLY INTENSIFY.
Q
------------------------------------------------------------------
2079

May 22 2018 15:47:10
Q !CbboFOtcZs
99
_AF1_5A_2.jpg _


AF1_5A_3.png


Sep 05 2018 13:01:16
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
188
>>99
Re: why not post an original picture +/- 1,2,3 secs to establish credibility?
Ex 1:
_AF1_5A_2 posted 11/09/17
_AF1_5A_3 posted 05/22/18
[2 sec stream]
Prepared.
Predictable.
This is not a game.
These people are stupid.
Q
------------------------------------------------------------------
2080

Sep 05 2018 13:44:07
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
189
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/u...stigation.html
Q
------------------------------------------------------------------
2081

Sep 05 2018 13:58:31
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
190
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...-russia-808316
Do you believe in coincidences?
Q
------------------------------------------------------------------
2082

Sep 05 2018 13:58:31
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
190
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...-russia-808316
Do you believe in coincidences?
Q

Sep 05 2018 15:08:00
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
191
>>190
https://saraacarter.com/president-tr...ongress-wants/
Do you believe in coincidences?
Q
------------------------------------------------------------------
2083

Sep 05 2018 17:33:03
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
192
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tocc...ature=youtu.be
[26:00]
Interesting line of questions?
Normal?
Military Law v. Criminal Law.
Think EO.
Think HRC panic.
Do you believe in coincidences?
You have more than you know.
Q
------------------------------------------------------------------
2084

Sep 05 2018 18:19:37
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
193
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...64177269514240
Q+
------------------------------------------------------------------
2085

Sep 05 2018 18:33:59
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
194
DWuttxKVwAARaSd.jpg-large.jpg


Fellow Patriots:
What you are about to learn should not only scare you, but intensify your resolve to take back control [Freedom]. The information that will become public will further demonstrate the criminal & corrupt [pure evil] abuse of power that the Hussein administration undertook in joint efforts w/ domestic and foreign dignitaries. The snowball has begun rolling - there is no stopping it now. D5.
Stay the course and trust the plan.
Protective measures are in place.
Remain BRAVE.
We knew this day would come.
G2qIXXafxCQ" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ
United We Stand (WW).
WWG1WGA.
We FIGHT.
Conspiracy no more.
Q
------------------------------------------------------------------

[Oddball]

I'm not so sure Corsi is anti Q. Corsi was working with Alex Jones as his Washinton man on the ground. When Alex decided Q was having a go at him and declared Q to be a distraction, I think Alex insisted that Corsi drop all the Q talk, or else.

I have always considered AJ to be controlled opposition. Just enough truth to pull people in but not enough to ever really disclose anything.

I really thought it was quite telling that AJ never even mentioned Q until February of this year. A good four months after Q had started posting. As for Corsi, I tried to watch some of his decodes but I did not like the way he interpreted Q. They were both very quick to say that Q had been compromised, case closed back in April. Then AJ started pushing his own anonymous "source of info on the Deep state" with that Zack fella.

Corsi tried, but in the end, I think the relationship between Corsi and Alex was what broke.

I think you're right, although I think there are several other people with much better Q decodes than Corsi.

[Michelle Marie]

Transparency...the common ground?

In the thread about the Weaponization of the US intelligence community that Bill posted, Robert Caron and Joshua Macias speak to interviewer, Ann Vandersteel announcing that a couple of websites are going to be used to release detailed information to the public.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1245971

Tracy Beanz comments in that video posted in the link above. Here is the original without commentary.

It's worth seeing more than once. It captures the spirit of the Truth movement.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=wffo7kig-kI

This whole Truth movement seems to be accelerating.
* Declassification of documents by Trump seems immanent.
* The amazing work of Judicial Watch continues to push things forward.
* The popularization through both positive and negative attention to Q Intel.
* The release of information from the 119 intelligence agency Oathkeeping patriots.
* The independent journalists that share their research.
* The Anons, of course!
* PA Researchers.

Some people can be bought off (like paid protesters or greedy politicians, etc.) and others just do the right thing (stay in integrity).

Through this people are showing their true colors. We see the character of each person and what they stand for. Within that, we can see their motives.

Clear sight...clear sailing.
The websites noted in Bill's thread above that will be delivering the information to the public will be up Friday!

The momentum is building!

MM

[edina]

Posted by edina (here)

Posted by edina (here)
I'm watching the video linked in the last Q post right now... evidently Lindsey Graham is asking questions about military law vs criminal law.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Tocc8EolxXg

Anyone else thinking of that little Huma/Lindsey Graham exchange?

This part of the questioning begins at 26:06.

"Let's talk about the law and war."

Lindsey Graham sets up this part of questioning prior to this by asking about Brett Kavanaugh's experience on 9/11.

I'm watching this and I'm thinking... brilliant, absolutely brilliant.

Because of all the hoopla surrounding this confirmation, more people than normal are watching this hearing.

Hillary Clinton herself is going bonkers with Twitter threads asking people to Stop Kavanaugh. Also drawing more attention to the hearings.

The emotionally hot headlines (click bait) are also drawing a lot of attention to these hearings.

And, of course, Q is drawing attention to this particular part of the hearings.

Millions of people read the Q-Posts. Millions.

In effect, Lindsey Graham is educating the public about this issue while asking Kavanaugh these questions.

Posted by Valerie Villars (here)
I thought the same thing endina "brilliant......absolutely brilliant".

I felt this is so important that I've decided to transcribe this bit and added live links to the relevant points.

Lindsey Graham, Brett Kavanaugh. Law and War.
Start: 26:06
LG: Let's talk about the law and war. Is there a body of law called the Law of Armed Conflict?

BK: There is such a body, Senator.

LG: Is there a body of law that's called basic Criminal Law?

BK: Yes sir.

LG: Are there differences between those two bodies of law?

BK: Yes, Senator.

LG: From an American citizens point of view, do your constitutional rights follow you; if you're in Paris, does the Fourth Amendment protect you as an American from your own government?

BK: From your own government, yes.

LG: Okay. So if you're in Afghanistan do your constitutional rights protect you against your own government?

BK: If you're an American in Afghanistan you have constitutional rights as against the US government. That’s long-settled law.

LG: Isn’t there also long-settled law that goes back to the Eisentrager case? I can't remember the name of it.

BK: Johnson v. Eisentrager

LG: Right. ... that American citizens who collaborate with the enemy have been considered enemy combatants?

BK: They can be.

LG: They can be.

BK: They can be. They're sometimes criminally prosecuted, sometimes treated in the military.

LG: Let's talk about can be. I think the –

BK: Under Supreme Court precedent--

LG: Right. There's a Supreme Court decision that said that American citizens who collaborated with
Nazi saboteurs were tried by the military. Is that correct?

BK: That is correct.

LG: I think a couple of them were executed.

BK: Yeah.

LG: So if anybody doubts, there's a long-standing history in this country that your constitutional rights follow you wherever you go but you don't have a constitutional right to turn on your own government, and collaborate with the enemy of the nation. You'll be treated differently. What's the name of the case, if you can recall, that reaffirmed the concept that you could hold one of our own is an enemy combatant if they were engaged in terrorist activities in Afghanistan, are you familiar with that case ?

BK: Yeah, Hamdi. (Hamdi v Rumsfeld)

LG: Okay. So the bottom line is, on every American citizen; know you have constitutional rights but you do not have a constitutional right to collaborate with the enemy. There's a body of law well developed long before 9/11 that understood the difference between basic criminal law and the Law Of Armed Conflict (LOAC) pdf. Do you understand those differences?

BK: I do understand that they're different bodies of law, of course, Senator.

End 28:33

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supre...t/339/763.html Johnson v Eisentrager

Basic Criminal Law
4 Basic Principles | The Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC)

[KiwiElf]

https://qanon.app/ is back up (takes a little while to load) - I'll leave the numbering in my earlier post 6705 as-is - KE

[KiwiElf]

Q: THOSE WHO KNOW CANNOT SLEEP - SGTreport

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5w7vC1tl_LI

SGTreport
Published on Sep 5, 2018

412anon, Grand Torino and Dragon return to SGTreport to discuss the very latest news regarding the great awakening, Q and President Trump VS. the deep state and pedophile cover-upper mockingbird media. And Dragon makes a bold prediction.

[edina]

Posted by Joe from the Carolinas (here)
mod hat on

I am seeing some fairly unsettling back-and-forth in this thread that is focused on the person behind the avatar, rather than an intellectual or analysis based discussion of the subject of the original post in this thread. Simply put, the Avalon community is better than at-the-human attacks.

While I understand that it is important to use the word "YOU" from time to time, I think things need to be a bit re-focused back onto the original subject of this thread, rather than attacking or challenging forum members that wish to post their views in this thread.

As a reminder, the subject of this thread is: "The Qanon posts, and a “Very Bad Day” Scenario - for some elite swamp critters (Nov 2017 and beyond)"

The subject of this thread is NOT "Attacking people that disagree about the interpretation, analysis, or anything associated with The Qanon posts".

Can we please observe more discussion and appropriate debate, rather than emotion-laden argumentation and ad hominems?

We do have a post report function, and unfortunately moderators do need to respond when things begin to veer off track.

Thanks in advance,
Your Project Avalon Moderation Team *mod hat off*

Thank you, I forgot to even consider reporting the posts. Next time, I will.

[KiwiElf]

The Public Has The Right To Know, It's Time To Expose The Lies - X22 Report Episode 1656b

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5fhB3nC2sGw

X22Report
Published on Sep 5, 2018

Judicial Watch uncovers information that the Podesta group was dealing with Ukraine just like Manafort.

Evidence is now pointing towards Obama signing off on the FISA warrant.

Trump starts the case of why Mueller is conflicted.

JW Sues DOJ for Records About Raid on Michael Cohen’s Office.

Five Eyes wants access to all encryption.

Taliban wants direct talks with Afghanistan government.

Russia bombs Idlib.

"Q" drops many breadcrumbs that the release of the FISA 20 pages is coming very soon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Dirty Little Secret Was Released To The Public, Part Of The Plan - X22 Report Episode 1656a

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ART2HpnO_Yw

X22Report
Published on Sep 5, 2018

Cryptos crash the banks say they are not going to setup crypto trading desks, part of the central banks plan.

GM sales plunge as they continue to hide their data.

The global financial system is breaking down and this is by design, currencies are declining, markets are detached, this is by design and the entire system will breakdown.

Trump has let the secret out to the public, this is step 1. Step 2 is next explaining why the Fed should be not be in charge of the financial system.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check Out The X22 Report Spotlight YouTube Channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1rn...

Join the X22 Report On Steemit: https://steemit.com/@x22report

Get economic collapse news throughout the day visit http://x22report.com
Report date: 09.05.2018

All source links to the report can be found on the x22report.com site.

[mojo]

Go ask Alice...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=h5elIvBf0X0

[Dennis Leahy]

Posted by edina (here)

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
I have not been paying attention to "q", but I heard someone mention that "q" gave it away that "q" is a deep state and mossad psyop, by "q" stating that Iran has to be taken out. Is this true?

A short answer to your above question. It’s not true.
If you want more explanation, I’ll respond.

But it is true. The words "taken out" were mine, because I remembered the gist, not the exact phrase. Now I see the exact phrase is "regime change", which means, "taken out." Please see below, where I cut and pasted a large version of that exact "q" quote. The deep state has been calling for "regime change" in Iran since at least 1979.
...

Posted by edina (here)
If you want to continue to cherry pick and conflate… go for it. Or, you could try to read to understand.
It’s up to you.
...
And this explains why every other person’s attempt to have an honest conversation with you has been an utter waste of their time.

Good day, Dennis.

"q said":
Free Iran!!!
Fight
Fight
Fight
Regime change.
People have the power.
We stand with you.
Q.

I'd guess 99.9% of people would hear the phrase "regime change", and think that q is promoting "regime change", and wouldn't think about the Shah of Iran in 1953 and believe that the current theocratic rulers are actually currently under the control of the deep state, but rather would think exactly what the words have meant for the past decades, greatly amplified by obomber and killary. When those psychopaths use the phrase "regime change", they mean a bayonet up the rectum (like Ghadaffi) regime change. It's a euphemism for murder.

You're right. I do not possess the ability to mold "q" words and phrases into alternative meanings that fit my preconceived notions and loyalties, the way I am seeing done here. turiya says "q" is very very careful about every word used in every game clue. Someone might want to tell "q" that a lot of us got real confused when "q" used the phrase, "regime change", and thought it meant "regime change." Some of us also found it rather odd that "q" and (the zionist psychopath) netanyahu both want regime change in Iran. That's why I posted, but I have run into a wall of excuses here, for something that should strike all of you as extremely odd: "q" is echoing netanyahu, echoing the deep state.

[waves]

Compelling argument for who Q is/has been. If true, I'm not sure what to think about the dichotomy if really not a Trump or military insider - the enormous positives in terms of awareness raising and getting people to talk and connect dots... in the same place as what would then be very repetitive false hope and cult cultivating aspects.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LZv0_ZT50Oc

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
Someone might want to tell "q" that a lot of us got real confused when "q" used the phrase, "regime change", and thought it meant "regime change."

Yes, I thought 'regime change' meant 'regime change', as well.

@ KiwiElf, turiya, edina, or anyone else: if Q really did write that, what did he/she/they really mean?

[turiya]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
Someone might want to tell "q" that a lot of us got real confused when "q" used the phrase, "regime change", and thought it meant "regime change."

Yes, I thought 'regime change' meant 'regime change', as well.

@ KiwiElf, turiya, edina, or anyone else: if Q really did write that, what did he/she/they really mean?

As I explained, if you look at the context of the post in which the two-word phrase has been used, then its pretty obvious. Regime change of course means a change of government. That change can happen / has happened with two different methods that have been employed.

1) Forces from without
2) Forces from within.

So, have a look at the context...
Q is obviously using this two-word phrase in support of the people of Iran in making the change for themselves.

duh! Its not that difficult. Only if you want it to be.

Dennis has been wanting the phrase use to be closely identified with Wesley Clark's knowledge that the Deep State wanted to take over 5 Middle Eastern countries wihin a 5-years time frame.

It works for Dennis to push the meaning (regime change from 'without') in this direction, as in his eyes Trump is just another dictator puppet being used by the cabal.

[edina]

Posted by turiya (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
Someone might want to tell "q" that a lot of us got real confused when "q" used the phrase, "regime change", and thought it meant "regime change."

Yes, I thought 'regime change' meant 'regime change', as well.

@ KiwiElf, turiya, edina, or anyone else: if Q really did write that, what did he/she/they really mean?

As I explained, if you look at the context of the post in which the two-word phrase has been used, then its pretty obvious. Regime change of course means a change of government. That change can happen / has happened with two differebt methods that have been used.

1) Forces from without
2) Forces from within.

Dennis, Bill, is there an open mind to have a conversation with the intent to understand?

Because if this is an intent to have a win/lose debate about who is right and wrong, I'm uninterested.

Dennis, your oozing sarcasm isn't helpful to the conversation.

I'm waiting to hear your responses before I proceed.

[KiwiElf]

When I had Uni students who skipped months of classes, demanded that I summarise months of study for them, or didn't hand their assignments in on time, my response was;

"It's not my job to do your homework, summaries, thinking, or learning for you; that's your job"

... and then I failed them ...

[edina]

Posted by KiwiElf (here)
When I had Uni students who skipped months of classes, demanded that I summarise months of study for them, or didn't hand their assignments in on time, my response was;

"It's not my job to do your homework, summaries, thinking, or learning for you; that's your job"

... and then I failed them ...

I think this has been a frustration for me, too.
It's hard to have a constructive conversation about "content" with a person who cannot be bothered to even read the content.

And in rereading Dennis' comment above, again his tone and attitude, indicates a closed mind.

This is why I wait to hear if there is a willingness to listen with an open mind, before I try to answer the questions.