+ Reply to Thread
Page 39 of 53 FirstFirst 1 29 39 49 53 LastLast
Results 761 to 780 of 1049

Thread: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

  1. Link to Post #761
    United States Avalon Member Arcturian108's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th August 2015
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mountains
    Language
    English
    Posts
    943
    Thanks
    9,901
    Thanked 8,326 times in 930 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    This is a report from Sweden. There may be another strong reason to homeschool your children besides coronavirus issues:

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/FSpoR4v7sMvL/

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Arcturian108 For This Post:

    onawah (26th August 2020)

  3. Link to Post #762
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,552
    Thanked 124,909 times in 20,684 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    onawah (26th August 2020)

  5. Link to Post #763
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,974 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Neurosurgeon Dr Charlie Teo - Cell Phone Radiation, Wifi, Depopulation
    108,583 views•Aug 21, 2017
    MIG MAG
    15.5K subscribers
    "Original Source: "Dr. Charlie Teo calls for a national Right To Know Law about cellphone radiation at a lecture with Dr. Devra Davis at University of New South Wales Law School November 18, 2015"


    One of the comments on the youtube page: "gavandlisa3
    1 year ago
    This is leading brain surgeon in Austrlaia, after his comments, how on earth can 5g go ahead when he is climing that 4g is already killing people like flies? If anyone knows the effects of EMR on the brain he does, why is no-one in our governments listening to him before approving 5g? Why is ANPARSA acting dumb? Clear corruption, we have the right to know the deaths and cancers it causes."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    ExomatrixTV (23rd August 2020)

  7. Link to Post #764
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,974 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    5G Space Wars
    From: A Microwaved Planet
    https://www.facebook.com/AMicrowaved...ref=nf&__xts__[0]=68.ARAlnALw2lNwNQecLXLnAZl8_L_V_YG4R5RktelmWvzu7ht_I2tMbhXwiJfPS0YqJGJCETS5hmMkEerXBgwOZ6cSWymIqzQ6 676HsSBlUTOfT_pSDIxBx1t-XAnynCQk0ZgyYcTfUheKa5S5e72lIE-BL8pYu9j4emiu5oqsMxvWLoQzUDUnhZvwgogwKl46U8rJxk4pKAHdSdVWWDVaXSZNxgIpaz7OCuzS7sb96mW7_2G-guQQkoTtd3REJf_4V2-R2ULj2QVNYMbQw6mkjZnyxZTRKLhdQQxRhfnjsH4jmMG1E84f_t7gmLQpb15AOgp5UR5GR_ggkJiOC_1diHhVcbI-Sw63akCKJhiJsnTp0qYB4ps_nmUD

    https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/regi...7HrZHqle3LNwrHTopic

    "How many wireless broadband satellites are already circulating over our heads? How do these satellites work? What is their likely impact on human health and the environment? And what can be done to stop this madness?

    Please join us next Thursday, August 13th at 7pm EST for an in-depth look at the race to launch 5G satellites into space.

    Our panel of experts includes renowned attorney Julian Gresser, engineer Ben Levi, space technology expert Joe Sandri and author and scientist Arthur Firstenberg.

    This national Zoom call will also stream simultaneously on our Facebook page (@Americans for Responsible Technology) via Facebook Live. Pre-registration is required.
    Time
    Aug 13, 2020 07:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)
    889 2304 9828
    To Join the Meeting
    Join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device:

    Please click this URL to join. https://us02web.zoom.us/w/8892304982...9rY2tSYXhaUT09 "
    Last edited by onawah; 12th August 2020 at 15:54.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    ExomatrixTV (23rd August 2020)

  9. Link to Post #765
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,974 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Online meeting about 5G satellites, August 13
    Arthur Firstenberg <info@cellphonetaskforce.org5G Space Appeal
    https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/

    "Dear Friends,

    Due to problems with my email marketing service, a great many of you were not receiving these important newsletters about our common future. Therefore I temporarily stopped sending them while I hired a consultant to troubleshoot and fix the problems. This is my first newsletter since June 18. Coincidentally, SpaceX also had problems with its launches and did not send any Starlink satellites into space during that time. The launch of 57 satellites on Friday, August 7, 2020 was SpaceX’s first such launch since June 13.

    Arthur

    THE CURRENT SITUATION IN SPACE

    SpaceX

    The launch of 57 more satellites by SpaceX in the early morning of Friday, August 7, at 1:12 AM EDT, has brought the number of SpaceX’s “Starlink” satellites orbiting in the Earth’s ionosphere up to 595.

    Although this was the first launch since June 13, SpaceX has not been idle during this time. It has built additional ground stations and has received permission from the Federal Communications Commission to operate (so far) 40 ground stations, scattered throughout the United States. It has signed up customers to begin “beta testing” of the satellites that are already in orbit. Beta testing will occur initially, says SpaceX, with customers who live between 44 and 52 degrees latitude in the northern U.S. and southern Canada. SpaceX plans to begin the testing sometime in September.

    As I reported in a previous newsletter, SpaceX’s launch of April 22, which brought the number of its satellites up to 420, was accompanied by reports of heart palpitations from far and wide, including from yours truly. I again felt strong heart palpitations that began early in the morning on August 7. Actually I began to experience a feeling of oppression Thursday night about two hours before the launch time. Please contact me if you have been having heart palpitations since Friday’s launch.

    OneWeb

    OneWeb, which is based in the UK, and which had declared bankruptcy in March, has been bailed out to the tune of one billion dollars by the UK government and Indian telecommunications company Bharti Global. And on May 26, 2020, OneWeb applied to the FCC for permission to compete on an equal footing with SpaceX by launching 47,844 satellites into the ionosphere.

    Although OneWeb’s offices are in the UK, none of its Directors live there. Its CEO, Adrián Steckel, is Mexican, and the rest of its Directors live in the U.S., Germany, Israel and Mexico. Its major stockholders are Qualcomm (Singapore), SoftBank Group (Japan), and 1110 Ventures (U.S.).

    Amazon

    On July 29, 2020, the FCC granted Amazon’s application to launch 3,236 satellites into the ionosphere. Like the satellites of SpaceX and OneWeb, Amazon’s satellites will operate at millimeter wave frequencies and use phased array technology to cover the Earth with focused beams of radiation enabling customers to access the Internet from anywhere on Earth, on land or ocean.

    The satellites of SpaceX, OneWeb and Amazon alone, if they are all launched, will total, together, about 92,000 satellites. If you add in Iridium and Globalstar, which are already operating small constellations, and the plans of Facebook, Link, Canadian companies Kepler and Telesat, the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation, Russia’s Roscosmos, and other competitors, there could soon be 100,000 satellites orbiting in the ionosphere.

    “But will you wake for pity’s sake”*

    The out-of-control satellite industry is one of the stupidest things humankind has ever created. It treats the life-giving envelope of our atmosphere as if we don’t depend on it. It poses an immediate threat to life on Earth, in so many ways.

    The 100,000 planned 5G satellites, each with a designed lifespan of 5 to 10 years, must be constantly de-orbited and replaced. This means that at least 10,000 satellites will have to be launched every year, forever into the future. If an average of 50 satellites can be launched on each rocket, that’s 200 rocket launches per year, just to maintain the satellites used for cell phones and Internet. And it means the de-orbiting of 10,000 worn out satellites per year, burning them up in the atmosphere and turning them into toxic dust and smoke. And that’s not counting the ever-increasing numbers of weather, research, tracking, monitoring, surveillance, military, and other kinds of satellites and missiles being launched in what will soon be a parade of rockets burning prodigious quantities of fossil fuels, punching holes in our atmosphere on a daily basis, and treating the source of all life as Earth’s largest garbage pit.

    Martin Ross of the Aerospace Corporation and other researchers have been modeling the effects of daily rocket launches on ozone and global temperatures. Rocket exhaust, depending on the type of fuel used, may contain chlorine and/or oxides of nitrogen, hydrogen, and/or aluminum, all of which destroy ozone. SpaceX’s kerosene-fueled rockets deposit enormous amounts of black soot into the stratosphere, where it accumulates, absorbing solar radiation and warming the stratosphere. The warming of the stratosphere accelerates the chemical reactions that destroy ozone.

    Most rockets are launched from the northern hemisphere. And the winter and spring of 2020 saw the largest and longest-lasting Arctic ozone hole in history. Ozone-watchers did not know what caused it, but they were not communicating with the scientists who are studying rocket exhaust. Our world is full of specialists, deaf and blind to other specialties, collectively asleep and marching toward oblivion.

    Atmospheric physicists do not study astronomy. Astronomers do not study electricity. Electricians do not study biology. Medical doctors do not study acupuncture. Doctors of oriental medicine do not study atmospheric physics. But the universe is not fragmented, it is a whole, and our culture has forgotten what that is, to its peril and to the peril of everything alive.

    The ionosphere is a source of high voltage that controls the electric circuitry of the biosphere and everything in it, including the fine-tuned circuitry of every human, every animal, every tree, and every fish. If we do not immediately stop the destruction of our fragile blanket of electrified air, upon which we depend for growth, healing, and life itself, climate change and ozone destruction may not matter. Beta testing begins in September.

    NATIONAL MEETING ABOUT SATELLITES, AUGUST 13

    On Thursday, August 13, 2020, from 7 to 9 PM EDT (2300 to 0100 UTC), Americans for Responsible Technology will host a meeting about the 5G satellites on Zoom that will be simulcast on Facebook. In the first hour, four presenters will speak for 15 minutes each:

    Ben Levi, technology consultant, will summarize the current satellite situation. Where are we now, and what is forecast over the next few years?

    Joe Sandri has a law degree and has training and experience in radiofrequency engineering. He will describe how the satellites work. How will a typical 5G transmission use the satellites? What kinds of earth stations will be required?

    Arthur Firstenberg will talk about the impact of the satellites on people and the environment. How will the electrical environment of the earth be altered by constant transmission of 5G signals?

    Julian Gresser, attorney, will address what is being done legally to stop this. What right does the FCC or any other agency have to authorize the use of space for private commercial interests? What are the legal and ethical principles involved?

    The second hour of the meeting will consist of a discussion among the presenters, followed by questions from the online audience, which will include members of the press.

    Attend by Zoom (limited space). Participants must register in advance: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/regi...7HrZHqle3LNwrH

    Watch on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/events/1176845649355076

    CORONAVIRUS’S HIDDEN THREAT

    When SpaceX begins its beta testing in the northern United States and southern Canada later this summer, the single biggest obstacle to recognizing its effects on humans will be COVID-19. Because no matter how many people sicken or die in that part of the world, it will be blamed on the coronavirus.

    As I pointed out in a previous newsletter, the pandemic began with 5G. 5G came to Wuhan shortly before the outbreak of COVID-19 there. 5G came to New York City streetlamps shortly before the outbreak of COVID-19 there. COVID-19 deprives the blood of oxygen, while radio waves deprive the cells of oxygen. COVID-19, alone, is just a respiratory virus like the common cold. But together with 5G, it is deadly. To deal with COVID-19 effectively, society must first recognize the harm done to the body by radio waves. 5G is radio waves on steroids.


    This worker’s death was not caused by hot weather, as was reported by the media

    Instead of acknowledging the harm from radio waves, society is tearing its fabric apart by instituting measures that are protecting no one and are instead sickening and killing people. I will mention just one of those measures here: facial masks.

    As a person who went to medical school, I was shocked when I read Neil Orr’s study, published in 1981 in the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Dr. Orr was a surgeon in the Severalls Surgical Unit in Colchester. And for six months, from March through August 1980, the surgeons and staff in that unit decided to see what would happen if they did not wear masks during surgeries. They wore no masks for six months, and compared the rate of surgical wound infections from March through August 1980 with the rate of wound infections from March through August of the previous four years. And they discovered, to their amazement, that when nobody wore masks during surgeries, the rate of wound infections was less than half what it was when everyone wore masks. Their conclusion: “It would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all” and that wearing a mask during surgery “is a standard procedure that could be abandoned.”

    I was so amazed that I scoured the medical literature, sure that this was a fluke and that newer studies must show the utility of masks in preventing the spread of disease. But to my surprise the medical literature for the past forty-five years has been consistent: masks are useless in preventing the spread of disease and, if anything, are unsanitary objects that themselves spread bacteria and viruses.

    Ritter et al., in 1975, found that “the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination.”
    Ha’eri and Wiley, in 1980, applied human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. “Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments.”
    Laslett and Sabin, in 1989, found that caps and masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. “No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used,” they wrote. Sjøl and Kelbaek came to the same conclusion in 2002.
    In Tunevall’s 1991 study, a general surgical team wore no masks in half of their surgeries for two years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, while after 1,551 operations performed without masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%.
    A review by Skinner and Sutton in 2001 concluded that “The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use.”
    Lahme et al., in 2001, wrote that “surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable.”
    Figueiredo et al., in 2001, reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn.
    Bahli did a systematic literature review in 2009 and found that “no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks.”
    Surgeons at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. “Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist,” wrote Dr. Eva Sellden.
    Webster et al., in 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries. Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group.
    Lipp and Edwards reviewed the surgical literature in 2014 and found “no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials.” Vincent and Edwards updated this review in 2016 and the conclusion was the same.
    Carøe, in a 2014 review based on four studies and 6,006 patients, wrote that “none of the four studies found a difference in the number of post-operative infections whether you used a surgical mask or not.”
    Salassa and Swiontkowski, in 2014, investigated the necessity of scrubs, masks and head coverings in the operating room and concluded that “there is no evidence that these measures reduce the prevalence of surgical site infection.”
    Da Zhou et al., reviewing the literature in 2015, concluded that “there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.”
    Schools in China are now prohibiting students from wearing masks while exercising. Why? Because it was killing them. It was depriving them of oxygen and it was killing them. At least three children died during Physical Education classes -- two of them while running on their school’s track while wearing a mask. And a 26-year-old man suffered a collapsed lung after running two and a half miles while wearing a mask.

    Mandating masks has not kept death rates down anywhere. The 20 U.S. states that have never ordered people to wear face masks indoors and out have dramatically lower COVID-19 death rates than the 30 states that have mandated masks. Most of the no-mask states have COVID-19 death rates below 20 per 100,000 population, and none have a death rate higher than 55. All 13 states that have death rates higher 55 are states that have required the wearing of masks in all public places. It has not protected them.

    “We are living in an atmosphere of permanent illness, of meaningless separation,” writes Benjamin Cherry in the Summer 2020 issue of New View magazine. A separation that is destroying lives, souls, and nature.
    _____________
    * from Christopher Fry, A Sleep of Prisoners, 1951.

    Arthur Firstenberg

    August 11, 2020 "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    fifi (30th August 2020), Luke Holiday (14th August 2020)

  11. Link to Post #766
    Avalon Member Hughe's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th November 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    966
    Thanks
    1,129
    Thanked 4,103 times in 806 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Biograd in Croatia adopts 5G moratorium

    The City Council of Biograd, a small town on the Adriatic coast and popular tourist summer yacht destination, near the old town of Zadar, has voted to ban the implementation of 5G until independent scientific research proves that the technology has no harmful health and environmental effects. After Hvar, this is the second Croatian tourist town to take the same decision.

    The news was announced on Monday, 10 August 2020, by a regional newspaper, Zadarski list:
    https://www.zadarskilist.hr/clanci/1...66huFW0l1D0q50
    For free society!

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hughe For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (29th August 2020), Bill Ryan (15th August 2020), Tracie (Bodhicee) (19th August 2020)

  13. Link to Post #767
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,974 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    5G Satellite Lawsuit Against the FCC
    Email update today from: 5G Crisis report@5gcrisis.com via gmail.mcsv.net

    8/18/20

    "Last week we hosted an international Zoom call to highlight the massive proliferation of 5G satellites in space. Our guest speakers were Ben Levi, Joe Sandri, Arthur Firstenberg and Julian Gresser.

    If you weren’t able to join the call, you can now watch the video here.

    Julian Gresser, a former Harvard and MIT law professor, is organizing the legal challenge to the FCC regarding its qualifications, experience and legal basis for authorizing the exploitation of space for private gain. We are supporting Julian and his team of legal, business and scientific experts to carry out this critical mission, and we hope you will join us.

    This Take Action Tuesday, we’re asking you to make whatever donation you possibly can to support the efforts of Julian Gresser and the Healthy Heavens Trust Initiative and to share this message with others.

    The Trust's co-sponsors, the Citizens for Health Education Foundation (CHEF) and the National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy (NISLAPP) are 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations, so all your donations are tax-deductible charitable contributions."


    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  14. Link to Post #768
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,974 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Epoch Times Covers CHD Case Against FCC, Quoting Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Petitioners
    By Conan Milner, Epoch Times
    https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...b-cf84941660dc
    https://www.theepochtimes.com/lawsui...b-c368044c395d

    "The case challenges the FCC to reconsider its wireless health and safety guidelines that have been in place since 1996."We know now, from thousands and thousands of peer-reviewed published studies, that microwave radiation injures the human body and human cells at a tiny fraction of what it takes to raise the temperature of your body," Kennedy said. "It shows a grim inventory of injuries connected to Wi-Fi, including oxidative stress, sperm and testicular damage, cell damage, DNA damage, and neuropsychiatric damage. The neuropsychiatric damage can be so powerful that it can be read almost immediately on EEGs in children, and those effects do not disappear after you withdraw the radiation."But you’re not likely to hear these details of this unsettled science in the mainstream media. Kennedy said one of the most frustrating issues in getting the public to understand the harms related to RF radiation is the powerful influence the wireless industry has in silencing the story. In a world where media companies are often intimately tied to big telecom companies that have a stake in the 5G rollout, such stories are bad for business. Facebook, in particular, admits to censoring criticism of 5G."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    ExomatrixTV (23rd August 2020), xylo (26th August 2020)

  16. Link to Post #769
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,552
    Thanked 124,909 times in 20,684 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    So when you combine:

    01. Rockefeller PDF Document Lockstep 2010
    02. Rockefeller Foundation PDF ID2020
    03. World Economic Forum #Agenda2030
    04. Bill Gates and his "Event 201" exercise in Fall 2019
    05. "The Great Reset"
    06. Club of Rome "Planetary Emergency Plan"
    07. "Global Governance" run by unelected (psychopathic) Technocrats using advanced A.I. Algorithms!
    08. 5G - Mass A.I. Surveillance Smart Grid (The Big Elephant in The Room!).

    All in plain sight ... meanwhile almost all Mainstream Media refuses to ask the hard questions!

    cheers,
    John Kuhles
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (29th August 2020), onawah (23rd August 2020), Philippe (23rd August 2020)

  18. Link to Post #770
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,552
    Thanked 124,909 times in 20,684 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Bogus "5G = virus" narrative & Dis-info memes exposed!

    ⚠️ In 2017 & 2018 before the mass C0VlD HYSTERIA ... I stated multiple times ON RECORD: That millions of new #5G Cell Towers & Smartphones could have an impact when we have a "common cold" or "common flu" ... I NEVER said nor claimed "5G = virus" ... Vast majority of our Stop5G Fb Group members neither!

    🌐 I also stated that the increase of more and more Erratic Pulsed Microwaves (Non-Native EMFs) Cumulative Radiation everywhere like: 4G WiFi & 5G AFFECTS our >> immune system << as it is shown in Declassified Navy Documents calling it "Microwave Sickness Symptoms" + 1000s other PubMed Peer Reviewed #Science2Stop5G Scientific publications like Dr. Martin Pall ... This evidence is NEVER allowed to be discussed in ANY mainstream media!

    ⚠️ This very important symptoms list has similarities with "flu-like symptoms" so WHY does the Mass Mainstream Media ONLY focus on the BOGUS "5G = virus narrative" false assumption we suppose to "agree" with? ... Which is an obvious LIE & Straw-man Argument Fallacy Tactic!

    🤔 How many "5G = Virus Memes" are NOT made by real #Stop5G Activists but by those who GAIN to flood social media with DIS-INFO? Then use it to demonize ANYONE discussing 5G + Flu connection we already discussed in 2017 & 2018 ... What if they knew in advance 5G will make ALL common flu & common cold more dangerous for the weak, the elderly and those having multiple other conditions? ... If so, THAT explains the FRAMING of Stop5G Activists to make us go silent (mass censorship).

    🦋 Now you know WHY Mainstream Media never allowed a real uncensored (live) debate between Pro 5G vs Stop5G Activists ever last 4 years! ... They FEAR US being treated fair & with 100% transparency for all to see.

    If you have ANY EVIDENCE that last 4 years Mainstream Media allowed an honest real open debate where a summary does 100% justice what we stand for ... Feel free to share that evidence here in comments. If you are NOT able to do that ... does that, at least, make you think & question how the masses are conditioned in a very narrow (corporate approved) narrative?

    John Kuhles, Aug 23, 2020
    Founder of Fb.com/groups/Stop5G
    Stop5G.net & Twitter.com/Stop5G
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    onawah (23rd August 2020)

  20. Link to Post #771
    Avalon Member Eric J (Viking)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    16th March 2010
    Location
    Stockbridge Hampshire UK
    Posts
    4,614
    Thanks
    12,962
    Thanked 24,081 times in 3,096 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    I think this belongs here...

    OOKLA 5G MAP (SEE WHERE YOU LIVE IF YOU WILL BE ZAPPED BY 5G - IT WILL KILL YOU)
    OOKLA 5G MAP™

    The interactive Ookla 5G Map tracks 5G rollouts in cities across the globe. Updated weekly from verified public sources and Ookla data, you can follow operators' newest 5G networks on @Ookla5GMap.

    https://www.speedtest.net/ookla-5g-map

    Viking
    You decide...your thoughts..your actions..your reality.
    Choose well.
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...are-the-change

  21. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Eric J (Viking) For This Post:

    Anka (23rd August 2020), ExomatrixTV (25th August 2020), onawah (24th August 2020)

  22. Link to Post #772
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,974 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    A Primer for Corrupt Governments: How to Implement 5G Wireless Technology Against the Wishes of Your Population
    By Claire Edwards
    Global Research, June 03, 2019
    https://www.globalresearch.ca/primer...lation/5679368

    (This may have been posted already, but probably merits a re-post. )

    "Spare a thought for all the governments wanting to cash in on the multi-trillion-dollar bonanza of the fifth generation of wireless technology or 5G while pacifying the half of their population who are anxious about its dire health and environmental consequences and keeping in ignorance the other half of the population who do not yet oppose its introduction because they are uninformed about its dangers.

    Various governments have adopted different strategies to tackle this challenge, any of which may serve as a template for other governments to use. Let us take some instructive examples from Austria, France, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. Governments that have been dilatory in availing themselves of the surveillance and control potential of 5G to quash dissent may wish to choose a strategy from the following list that they feel is most compatible with the national character and situation of their country and therefore most likely to meet their need for a smooth and rapid 5G rollout.

    Austria: brute force and public ignorance

    The most advisable strategy for any cautious government is to ensure that the population remains uninformed of the dangers of 5G. This is relatively simple to achieve by using brute force to rapidly sign into law legislation forcing the entire population to accept “smart” meters with no possibility of refusal, as the Austrian government did in 2018, and issuing a Gesteznovelle or amendment to a law allowing 5G antennas to be installed on all public buildings, including nurseries, kindergartens and schools. This results in a quick 5G rollout, which can then be portrayed as a triumph in the race to digitalization and its claimed benefits of more jobs, faster downloads, low latency, fourth industrial revolution, core cloud, cutting edge technology, or any other similarly hyperbolic promotional rhetoric designed to con the public (or, in PR language, “capture the public imagination”).

    Complicity with the media conveniently ensures that no whisper of the dangers inherent in a new and untested technology penetrates the public sphere. The population remains in ignorance, is not given the option to refuse 5G infrastructure and is propagandized to believe that their country is at the forefront of the modern age. This strategy has much to recommend it and avoids all controversy, long-winded debate, troublesome negotiations, annoying delays and unnecessary costs. Well done, Austria, for demonstrating how easy the 5G rollout can be when such a simple and highly effective strategy is adopted!

    France: trickery and opportunism

    France offers two possible strategies for rolling out 5G, each of which has great potential. France’s majority state-owned ENEDIS is steamrolling the French public with “smart” meters (called “Linky”) for the 5G Internet of Things, despite opposition from 71% of the population. Since 1884, electric meters belong to the municipalities of France, 906 of which, out of a total of 35,498 (2.5%) are refusing “smart” meters, a number that is constantly rising. The French population recognizes that “smart” meters are being imposed without their consent, with many complaints of trickery used by ENEDIS subcontractors, including some where the gendarmerie had to intervene to protect the citizenry.

    If stealth and trickery should fail, another possibility is to take advantage of a national tragedy to impose 5G surreptitiously. While the nation is preoccupied mourning the loss of a much-loved historical monument, oligarchs – including those with close ties to telecommunications companies – have a whip round involving hundreds of millions of euros each to reconstruct rather than restore, your lawmakers announce the suspension of regulations regarding the protection of a national and world heritage site, and declare the legitimacy of rebuilding according to “the techniques and challenges of our era”. Any dissent expressed by historical experts or architects about the origins of the fire or the manner of rebuilding the monument is suppressed.

    The public discovers only later that the ground on which the monument stood had already been subject to advance privatization plans before the terrible tragedyof its destruction and hey presto!, it can be rebuilt complete with modern technology suitable for the 5G rollout, especially appropriate and convenient given its central location as the “point zero” of France, from which all distances in the country are calculated.

    Since France´s 5G rollout strategy is not yet complete, the above scenario remains at the level of speculation; only time will tell if indeed this strategy turns out to be the one employed. Whatever the case, it would have been a strong contender for most inventive strategy had it not been a longstanding and now rather tired strategy of disaster capitalism, these days greatly facilitated by the advent of directed energy weapons.

    Switzerland: intricacies of the exclusion clause and amended subparagraph

    Switzerland´s public servants are to be commended for demonstrating a mental dexterity that has enabled them to solve the conundrum of introducing 5G while facing an educated and informed citizenry. It has provided a useful template for the benefit of similarly unfortunate governments. Switzerland´s approach involves the devious use of exclusion clauses and innocent-looking subparagraphs.

    Switzerland follows the exposure levels set out in the so-called safety guidelines of the so-called International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (more about these “guidelines” and ICNIRP later). The problem for the Swiss government is that Switzerland has precautionary exposure levels for single transmitters (base stations) that are 10 times lower than the ICNIRP levels.

    Having gone ahead and auctioned the available spectrum in the 700 MHz and 3.5 GHz bands in February 2019, netting US$380 million, the Swiss government was faced with the challenge of enabling the use of the spectrum it had sold by raising limits without alerting the public.

    As the public and cantonal lawmakers gradually started to grasp the scale of the threat from the completely untested 5G, the federal government’s dilemma grew. First came a people´s petition to force a parliamentary debate on 5G signed by 56,000 Swiss, then the cantons of Vaud, Jura and Geneva adopted moratoria on the 5G rollout. These were closely followed by Neuchâtel, which posed a series of questions to the federal government regarding the safety of 5G technology.

    Cantonal lawmakers and Swiss citizens were outraged when the majority state-owned Swisscom defied the opposition to 5G by using existing antennas installed for previous generations of wireless technology to impose 5G on 102 locations in Switzerland. They will doubtless be further outraged when they learn that Swisscom has known about the non-thermal effects of electromagnetic radiation since at least 2004, when it filed a patent on a method and system for reducing electro smog in wireless local networks. This reveals that Swisscom has rolled out 5G on the Swiss population in full knowledge of its ability to cause damage to DNA and increase cancer risk.

    Wireless Radiation: Stop the 5G Network on Earth and in Space, Devastating Impacts on Health and the Environment
    On 17 April, the federal government made its move to stymie the public opposition while enabling the 5G rollout. This constitutes a veritable primer on conning the public. It published a document modifying its 1999/2016 ordinance on protection against non-ionizing radiation (NIR), with effect from 1 June 2019. The beauty of this is that an ordinance cannot be challenged by a people´s referendum. The accompanying report helpfully explains the purpose and operation of the modifications.

    Given that more than half the Swiss population considers the radiation emitted by mobile phone antennas to be dangerous or rather dangerous (Office fédéral de la statistique (OFS), Omnibus 2011, 2015), the modifications to the ordinance have two significant purposes: (1) to establish a system of monitoring public exposure to NIR (sect. 4.1.1) in accordance with the Aarhus Convention, which obliges ratifying states to inform the public about pollutants and their effects on people and the environment, and (2) to fill the gaps in regulation that impede the deployment of 5G (sect. 2).

    Point 1, the monitoring system, sounds promising until we are told later on in the report that the Federal Office for the Environment (OFEV) would be tasked with informing the public periodically of the extent of their exposure to NIR and the state of the science on the effects of NIR, but that no coordination with the Federal Office of Public Safety would be required since “no biological marker or modification of a biological marker presenting a link with NIR or its effects on health has been identified to date [sic]” (sect. 4.1.1).

    The great advantage of this strategy, we are told, is that the public would thereby be informed “in an objective manner about its exposure to NIR and its origin, and the current margin as compared to the limits set out in the ordinance, which would contribute to taking the passion out of the debate and the perception of risk”. And most satisfyingly, OFEV would always be in a position to justify to the public why the current exposure limits were in line with science and testing (sect. 4.1.2). In other words, it would be a closed circle and no examination of the real health and environmental dangers of NIR would be possible.

    Point 2 is equally a master-stroke, for filling in the gaps in regulations that impede the deployment of 5G turns out to mean that the modified ordinance should include a principle of evaluation of “beam-forming” antennas and that “mobile phone antennas that emit during less than 800 hours per annum” should be exempted from the requirement to “respect the preventative exposure limits” (sect. 2).

    This sleight of hand enables the federal government to exclude all 5G antennas from regulation, since they are all beam-forming and, if their emissions are calculated on the basis of their “directionality”, as implied by the chap. 62, additional subpara. 6, which states that “[The term] beam-forming antennas is intended to mean the radiating direction or the antenna pattern is adjusted automatically at short intervals”, it appears that it could be not the entirety of the emissions that would be subject to calculation, but solely each direction of emission. 800 hours would permit two months of emissions per annum per stationary antenna, but if each degree of emission of, for example, 180 degrees of movement of a directional antenna were to be permitted 800 hours, then no 5G antenna, all of which are directional, could exceed 800 hours of emissions and therefore none would come within the ambit of the modified ordinance.

    Et voilà! As if by magic, the Swiss federal government checkmates the Swiss people and their cantonal governments to enable 5G!

    It is to be noted here that, thanks to the diligence of Swiss NGO Gigaherz, Swiss telephone companies have already been caught in the act of illegally irradiating the Swiss people, when antennas hidden under manhole covers were found in 2018 to be transmitting way in excess of their permitted limits.

    Who would know if the millions of beam-forming antennas throughout Switzerland were exceeding the permitted exposure limits or transmitting in excess of 800 hours? Would anyone want to risk exposure by taking up position within their vicinity, given that the new beam-forming antennas are “especially used with the high frequencies auctioned in early 2019” (sect. 4.3)?

    No wonder Switzerland is famous for its high-class and high-tech products! Its skill and meticulousness in drafting such a Byzantine 5G rollout strategy trumps all!

    United Kingdom: strict legalism and authoritative assertions

    The United Kingdom can always be relied upon for its professed adherence to the rule of law. Thus enquirers as to the safety of 5G, both members of the public and parliamentarians, are treated to lengthy disquisitions on the reliability of the so-called science produced by the various official bodies responsible for assuring the public that they are duly protected from electromagnetic radiation (EMR). As in the popular British children´s party-game, this may be termed a “pass-the-parcel” strategy and is greatly facilitated by the existence of a large number of organizations with acronyms that may be conveniently juggled as needed.

    Answers to questions in parliament or from the public are drafted along the following lines: Public Health England relies on AGNIR [if this body has unfortunately been disbanded due to allegations of conflict of interest, incompetence, lack of qualified experts, falsified science or any other reason, the name of another body such as ICNIRP or SCENIHR may be substituted here] to supply the scientific evidence showing the safety of wireless telecommunications technologies since [add appropriate date]. The World Health Organization endorses the safety guidelines set forth by [name of body] in setting its EMR safety guidelines. Should Public Health England be made aware of any changes in the science, it will amend its policies accordingly.

    It may easily be seen that the UK strategy is an astute one since it serves simultaneously to impress and mystify, for no one has any clue as to the meaning of the various acronyms or the tainted reputations of the various bodies named, especially when they hail from another country. Such is the case, for example, with the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection or ICNIRP, which is in reality just a little club of male scientists in Germany that appoints its own members without supervision or consultation with anyone and mysteriously receives funding from, and is housed by, the German government, conveniently in the same building with the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection. Nor would any UK citizen be likely to wonder how it came to be that the little club´s guidelines were adopted and endorsed not only by the UN´s World Health Organization, but also by its International Telecommunication Union.

    Great work, United Kingdom! Deceiving the public while sounding sincere and trustworthy is quite an achievement. A note of caution, though, for other governments considering employing a similar strategy: it does necessitate a certain level of gullibility among the general public and is therefore unlikely to be effective in the case of populations already skeptical about government pronouncements.

    United States: big spending by lobbyists to enable capture of government agencies

    As may be expected of the United States, the preferred 5G rollout strategy involves money and muscle. The imposition of 5G without public consent or consultation was made possible long in advance by regulatory capture by industry, which ensured that laws were changed to prohibit injury to health and environmental damage being taken into account to prevent or hinder the rollout of 5G.

    President Clinton signed into law the 1996 Telecommunications Act, section 704 of which states that no health or environmental concern can interfere with the placement of telecom equipment such as cell towers and antennas. Wireless facilities have been made a permitted use in all public rights-of-way, with the intention of locating them directly in front of homes and businesses and close above the heads of pedestrians, including mothers with babies. Public notice requirements and public hearings have been eliminated. Local authorities are prohibited from taking into consideration testimony from scientific experts. For example, local governments are prohibited from regulating wireless technology “on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency radiation”, and courts have reversed regulatory decisions about cell tower placement simply because most of the public testimony was about health.

    Combined with corporate control of the media, preferably by telecommunications companies, and manipulation of lawmakers by armies of highly paid lobbyists, the strategy of regulatory capture is much to be admired, since – barring the appearance of a lawmaker with integrity and the existence of alternative media – it becomes almost impossible for the public to learn that 5G was never tested for health or safety and poses an existential threat to the entire planet.

    In a country such as the US that believes itself a bastion of freedom, the public are unlikely to find plausible the idea that they are being hoodwinked in this way over such a dangerous technology and the 5G rollout may therefore be expected to proceed relatively unhindered. Should any information on the adverse effects of 5G leak out, recourse may be made to the oft-used and handy “blame-it-on-the-Russians” narrative. It should be noted, however, that this strategy requires considerable advance planning and the easy availability of funds sufficient to make your point of view the only one visible to lawmakers. It will therefore not be within the means of all countries. Nevertheless, this one has to qualify for the prize in the “heavy-handed but effective” category.

    International aid and assistance

    Implementation of the above strategies is likely to be facilitated by recourse to the assistance of international organizations. If the aim is to impose a global telecommunications technology capable of “blanketing” the Earth, as stated in the literature on 5G, especially one involving transmissions by satellites, it would be indispensable to enlist the aid of the United Nations. An appropriate Secretary-General would have to be appointed, preferably someone benefitting from a professional background as an electrical engineer and physicist. Timing here is all, for such an opportunity arises only once every eight years.

    Should 5G proponents be successful in this, they would have struck gold, for a UN Secretary-General can guide all of the organization´s activities in the desired direction, ensuring that 5G deployment feeds into the implementation of all treaties and conventions and thus becomes seen as a sine qua non in all resulting policy-making activities.

    The UN Secretary-General also has the prerogative of “spontaneously” appointing, for example, an international Panel on Digital Cooperation, which could include all the international proponents of 5G in one go, while conveniently excluding any difficult people such as scientists or physicians knowledgeable about the deleterious biological effects of EMR. The Panel´s terms of reference would want to ensure its separation from the usual work of the UN, again obviating time-wasting questions that might be posed by UN officials or other concerned experts. The members of the Panel would automatically gain access to all UN member states, thereby profiting from the opportunity of one-sidedly convincing them of the benefits of 5G while conveniently failing to mention any possible downsides to the technology.

    Should anyone have the temerity to raise objections to the UN’s failure to even mention the word “health” in the context of its rush to embrace 5G in all its programs and to assist in its imposition on every inch of the planet as well as in space, the cooperation agreement between Interpol and the UN’s International Telecommunication Union may be usefully invoked to intimidate such a person as a potential cybercriminal.

    The generally favorable worldwide public view of UN activities combined with universal ignorance about those activities and their purposes makes seeking such international assistance distinctly advantageous.

    A smorgasbord of opportunities for rolling out 5G

    I hope it is clear by now to all the governments reading this primer on the world´s most effective 5G rollout strategies that they have a smorgasbord of opportunities and support available to them for implementing 5G. Excuses regarding opposition from namby-pamby scientists and physicians across the world complaining about the lack of health and safety testing of 5G, citing the tens of thousands of studies that demonstrate the biological effects of EMR, or calling 5G the stupidest idea in the history of the world will not be tolerated.

    Nor will excuses regarding pockets of opposition from nationals of your countries who cite phenomenal rises in all the major diseases of civilization since the advent of wireless technology and smartphones, plus ADHD, autism, suicides, depression, neurological diseases, and catastrophic decreases in fertility across the planet, as well as major declines in insect populations.



    5G IS A GOOD THING BECAUSE WE SAY SO AND YOU WILL DO AS YOU HAVE BEEN INSTRUCTED OR LIVE TO REGRET IT WHEN WE CONTROL EVERYTHING

    Signed:

    Sophia

    pp. A.I.

    *

    Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc."

    Claire Edwards, BA Hons, MA, worked for the United Nations as Editor and Trainer in Intercultural Writing from 1999 to 2017. Claire warned the Secretary-General about the dangers of 5G during a meeting with UN staff in May 2018, calling for a halt to its rollout at UN duty stations. She part-authored, designed, administered the 30 language versions, and edited the entirety of the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (www.5gspaceappeal.org) and vigorously campaigned to promote it throughout 2019. In January 2020, she severed connection with the Appeal when its administrator, Arthur Firstenberg, joined forces with a third-party group, stop5ginternational, which brought itself into disrepute at its foundation by associating with the Club of Rome/Club of Budapest eugenicist movement. She is a frequent contributor to Global Research.

    The original source of this article is Global Research
    Copyright © Claire Edwards, Global Research, 2019
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (29th August 2020), mountain_jim (30th August 2020)

  24. Link to Post #773
    Great Britain Avalon Member
    Join Date
    2nd August 2020
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    53
    Posts
    161
    Thanks
    2,526
    Thanked 1,442 times in 159 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Hello all,

    Dr Sarah Myhill has compiled a huge list of links to medical reports and other sources of information related to 5G on her website, which I feel I have to share here, in case it contains useful information that may be new to any of the group members. Though I see that there is a wealth of articles here already!

  25. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Anna70 For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (27th August 2020), mountain_jim (30th August 2020), onawah (27th August 2020)

  26. Link to Post #774
    Avalon Member Hughe's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th November 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    966
    Thanks
    1,129
    Thanked 4,103 times in 806 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    CLAIRE EDWARDS is with us once again via a livestream. In this presentation she will present and share with us a very speciel document which she calls a GROUNDBREAKING document, with major revelations about what is really going on on our planet right now. Claire Edwards is a former United Nations Staffer in Vienna and Editor and Co-author of the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.

    Download the document here:

    DOWNLOAD

    Here is a description of the presentation from Claire:

    WHAT ON EARTH IS GOING ON?

    Claire Edwards will present a document drawn up by a group of experts that comprehensively explains what is happening on our planet right now and why. It is also a self-help manual for a situation unprecedented in human history.
    For free society!

  27. The Following User Says Thank You to Hughe For This Post:

    norman (28th August 2020)

  28. Link to Post #775
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,206
    Thanks
    207,997
    Thanked 456,565 times in 32,726 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Quote Posted by Hughe (here)
    CLAIRE EDWARDS is with us once again via a livestream. In this presentation she will present and share with us a very speciel document which she calls a GROUNDBREAKING document, with major revelations about what is really going on on our planet right now. Claire Edwards is a former United Nations Staffer in Vienna and Editor and Co-author of the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.

    Download the document here:

    DOWNLOAD

    Here is a description of the presentation from Claire:

    WHAT ON EARTH IS GOING ON?

    Claire Edwards will present a document drawn up by a group of experts that comprehensively explains what is happening on our planet right now and why. It is also a self-help manual for a situation unprecedented in human history.
    Here's the video, streamed live 13 hours ago:


  29. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    mountain_jim (30th August 2020), norman (28th August 2020), Yoda (28th August 2020)

  30. Link to Post #776
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    68
    Posts
    8,844
    Thanks
    9,913
    Thanked 54,639 times in 8,116 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)


    Here's the video, streamed live 13 hours ago:




    Here's a cleaned up and trimmed ( chopped out the 10 minute break and other tweaks) AUDIO version:

    Play or download
    MP3
    https://app.box.com/s/xlwep1a9435v4velkvpjaz6302mhjn5d
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  31. The Following User Says Thank You to norman For This Post:

    mountain_jim (30th August 2020)

  32. Link to Post #777
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,974 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Trump’s Campaign Revitalized His Proposal to Nationalize 5G
    AUGUST 28, 2020
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...d-cd2864f0d378

    By Dafna Tachover, CHD’s Director of 5G & Wireless Harms Project

    "President Trump’s campaign is reviving its proposal to nationalize 5G, which means that the government will build 5G “small cell” infrastructure and rent access to wireless carriers. Trump first suggested the plan in early 2018, but it met with strong resistance from the FCC, the telecom industry and Congress. The plan was dropped shortly thereafter, and the Air Force official who authored it was removed from the National Security Council and left the White House.

    Several rationales have been used to justify the plan, including the alleged need to win the race to 5G over China; establish a national high-speed wireless internet network; provide rural America a breakthrough in quality of life and economic growth; and promote the US economy by building a massive infrastructure just like the buildout of the national highway system in the 1950s.

    However, when the main concern regarding China is national security and providing a secure network, promoting 5G as a tool to beat China and address cyberespionage seems counterproductive, as the main problem with wireless networks is, in fact, cybersecurity. Wireless networks can be easily hacked. A better solution is to provide fiber optics to the home.

    Fiber optic infrastructure has been deployed in many rural areas across the country and has already been paid for by taxpayers. Nevertheless, in many cases the fiber optic network hasn’t been connected to the homes; instead it has been used to connect cell towers.

    Fiber optic infrastructure would provide a safer, faster and healthier solution. 5G has been promoted as an economic booster, and it is supposed to be an infrastructure for the Internet of Things, driverless cars and “smart cities.” However, the voices within the telecom industry that consider the 5G hype to be false are growing and some even say that it is perhaps “a scam perpetrated by an industry desperate for growth.”

    One thing is certain: the deployment of 800,000 5G “small cell” antennas near homes and interconnecting 50 billion more radiation-emitting devices, as this current plan dictates, is going to result in a health crisis. In fact, widespread sickness already exists. Ignoring the evidence is merely going to increase the size of the problem."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  33. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (29th August 2020), fifi (30th August 2020), Harmony (29th August 2020), Luke Holiday (4th September 2020), mountain_jim (30th August 2020)

  34. Link to Post #778
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,552
    Thanked 124,909 times in 20,684 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Massive Predicted Effects of #5G in the Context of Safety Guideline Failures:

    Massive Predicted Effects of 5G

    Professor Emeritus Martin Pall

    Massive Predicted Effects of 5G in the Context of Safety Guideline Failures:


    Very High-Level VGCC Sensitivity to Low-Intensity EMFs and Especially to Pulsations Feb. 25, 2020

    The voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) protein molecule contains a four domain structure with each domain carrying an alpha helix, each designated an S4 helix, containing 5 positive charges. Those four charged alpha helixes act together as what is called the voltage sensor, the structure that responds to electrical changes across the plasma membrane to open the channel. It has been shown that not only 4 distinct types of VGCCs, but also a voltage gated sodium channel, potassium channel and chloride channel are all activated by low intensity EMFs of various frequencies, suggesting that the EMFs act on the voltage sensor. In plants, EMFs apparently act via activation of some other channels, known as TPC channels, which also contain a similar voltage sensor. The structure and location of the voltage sensor and two laws of physics, Coulomb’s law and Ohm’s law, predict that the EMF forces on the voltage sensor are stunningly strong, approximately 7.2 million times stronger than the forces on singly electrically charged groups in the aqueous parts of our cells and bodies. This explains why the voltage sensor is the main direct target of the EMFs. The voltage-gated sodium, potassium and chloride channels apparently play only minor roles in producing EMF effects, so that to a first approximation, effects can be explained as being predominantly from VGCC activation and consequent increases in intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i. This falsifies the industry claim that there are only thermal effects can occur. The VGCC mechanism has been widely accepted in the scientific community as shown be the 247 citations of my first 2013 EMF paper (Google Scholar) and by my 58 different invited professional talks on this topic.

    Large numbers of non-thermal pathophysiological EMF effects can be explained through the action of VGCC activation as produced by two different pathways of action shown in Fig. 1 below: the calcium signaling pathway and the peroxynitrite/free radical/oxidative stress/inflammation pathway. These include are 9 types of effects produced from microwave frequency non-thermal effects as shown in from 9 to 38 different reviews: Lowered male and female fertility; increased neurological/neuropsychiatric effects; 3 types of effects on cellular DNA; endocrine (hormonal) effects; increased apoptosis (programmed cell death); cardiac effects on the electrical control of the heart; oxidative stress/free radical damage; excessive [Ca2+]i; cancer.



    ICNIRP, EU, UK and other “safety guidelines” are all based on average intensities over a 6 minute period, with allowable exposures set by SAR, a measure of heating. Predictions of these safety guidelines have been tested by 8 different highly repeated types of studies and each of these 8 shows that the safety guideline fail and fail massively. Modulating pulsations, nanosecond pulses and paired nanosecond pulses of identical polarity each produce large effects that the safety guidelines claim cannot be produced. These pulsation effects are of high relevance to 5G because 5G is designed to be very highly pulsed in order to carry vast amounts of information per second because it is the pulsations that carry the information. Other types of evidence showing that the safety guidelines do not predict biological effects include the calcium channel blocker studies which show that low-intensity EMF exposures produce effects through VGCC activation rather than by heating, the many reviews showing non-thermal health impacts discussed above and the findings that there are exposure windows that produce maximum effects but lower and higher intensity exposures produce much lower effects. The failure of the “safety guidelines” to predict biological effects and therefore safety means that these are not safety guidelines. Consequently, any claims of safety made by the multi-trillion euro telecommunications industry based on these “safety guidelines” are simply fraudulent.

    These failures of the “safety guidelines” must be considered in terms of the principle that is at the core of the scientific method. That principle is that when we have a scientific theory and we test predictions of that theory and the theory predictions are shown to be false, then we must throw the theory out. It follows that when we have eight highly repeated findings each of which show that the “safety guidelines” do not predict biological effects and do not, therefore, predict safety, it is a scientific requirement that the “safety guidelines” be thrown out. The failure of ICNIRP, the European Commission and various regulatory agencies to throw out the “safety guidelines” clearly shows that their actions are both unscientific and anti-scientific.

    Penetration of Millimeter Wave Effects

    What can we say, then, about 5G? MM-waves used for 5G also work via VGCC activation. 5G is designed to carry extraordinarily high amounts of information per second and is, therefore, extraordinarily highly pulsed. The electrical parts of these MM-waves do not penetrate well into buildings, such that millions of 5G antennae are planned in close proximity to our home, schools, churches, businesses, etc,
    such that it will be nearly impossible to avoid exposures. Given the high pulsation level for 5G radiation, even short exposures may well produce severe biological effects. In addition to this, the finding that 5G systems involve output power sometimes like 30 times higher output than did previous systems, we have an strong argument for disaster (Human exposure to RF fields in 5G downlinkI Nasim, S Kim - arXiv preprintarXiv:1711.03683, 2017 - arxiv.org).

    It has been argued by the industry that 5G will only produce effects in the outer millimeter of the body because of the absorption of 5G radiation and other MM-wave frequency EMFs. It is the case that 5G and other millimeter wave frequencies will produce very strong surface effects which are of major concern. But it has also been shown that MM-waves produce highly penetrating effects, impacting human brain function and EEG activity and also impacting many internal organs in animals.
    Zalyobokskaya NP, 1977. Biological effect of millimeter radiowaves. Vrachebnoye Delo 3: 116-119. Declassified and Approved for release 2012/05/10: CIA-RDP88B01125R000300120005-6 Levedeva NN, Reactions of the central nervous system to peripheral effects of low-intensity EHF emissions. Approved for release 2000/08/10: CIA-RDP96-00792R000100070001-9 Potekhina IL, Akoyev GN, Yenin LD, Oleyner 1992 Effects of low-intensity electromagnetic radiation in
    the millimeter range on the cardiovascular system of the white rat. Fiziol Zh 78:35-41Numerous other citations showing penetrating effects of millimeter waves are cited in: Betskii OY &Lebedeva NN. Low-intensity millimeter waves in biology and medicine. In: Clinical Application of Bioelectromagnetic Medicine, Marcel Decker, New York, pp. 30-61. A very recent paper came to the same conclusion that millimeter waves produce highly penetrating effects for the same reason, extensive empirical evidence: Kostoff et al (Toxicol Lett 2020:323;35-40).

    So the industry claims are wrong on this as in so many other areas. How can we get such penetrating effects? The magnetic parts of the coherent EMFs are highly penetrating. They place forces on dissolved ions in the aqueous parts of our cells and bodies, moving those ions and regenerating the electrical parts of the EMFs with the same frequency and pulsations, just much lower intensity. Those can then activate theVGCC voltage sensor because of its extraordinary sensitivity to the electrical forces of even very weak EMFs. So the physics again tells us how the system works on the main actual biological target of the VGC voltage sensor.


    The impacts of any full-fledged 5G (it always works together with 4G) will be vastly worse than any initial impacts seen following the turning on of 5G, because initially 5G has little to communicate with, so it will initially have much less pulsation. My six worst nightmares is that 5G will produce widespread in most cases universal or near-universal impact of the following types (and each of these needs to be considered in detail, based on the available evidence):

    1. A rapid and irreversible crash in human reproduction to close to zero, based mainly but not solely on the impacts on male reproduction.
    2. A rapid (albeit somewhat slower than in 1) crash in our collective brain function produced by massive impacts on human brain
    structure and function.
    3. Very early-onset Alzheimer’s dementia also caused by the human brain impact seen in 2.
    4. Autism and ADHD caused primarily by perinatal 4G/5G exposures.
    5. Massive deterioration in the human gene pool, caused by the DNA effects in human sperm and possibly also on human eggs.
    6. Widespread sudden cardiac death in all age ranges caused by the EMF impacts on the pacemaker cells in the sino-atrial node of the heart.

    What are we actually seeing initially from 5G?

    The reports of human effects in Switzerland included many reports of neurological/neuropsychiatric effects and also cardiac effects.
    There are, of course many reviews reporting such effects, as discussed above, following EMF exposures. The physicians in Stuttgart reported these same two types of effects following 5G rollout and in addition, high amounts of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS).
    All three of these effects were reported to occur following smart meter exposures in both the Lamech and also the Conrad studies; all three were also reported to occur in the largest EMF occupational exposures studies ever performed as reviewed by Professor Emeritus Karl Hecht. The difference is that the effects appear to be much more severe following 5G exposure as opposed to the occupational exposure studies or even the smart meter studies. I am aware of still more severe apparent 5G neuropsychiatric effects in Southern California, but those have not been published to date. We have every reason to believe that any full fledged 5G system, communicating with the “internet of things” will produce still vastly greater effects than any of these initial findings.

    It was proudly announced in England that an ambulance service will be using 5G communication between the ambulances and the hospitals served by them. The first such ambulance, it was proudly announced, was to be put into operation in Coventry in the West Midlands region of the UK:
    So what happened when that 5G ambulance was operational? What happened is that three of the ambulance personnel died within an 11 day period of apparent suicide: Three NHS workers die suddenly while working for same 'toxic' ambulance trust. Could 5G be related? Alan Selby Mirror Sun, 24 Nov 2019 02:23 UTC;
    Shortly before their deaths a whistleblower wrote to the East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust's boss complaining about psychological abuse. There are widespread neuropsychiatric effects produced by low-intensity EMF exposures, including depression. Depression can cause suicide and various neuropsychiatric effects may well lead to abusive behavior.
    Two large occurrences of panic in cattle in the North Friesland area of the Netherlands correlated with 5G testing exposures:
    This should not be surprising, given that EMF exposures cause neurological/neuropsychiatric effects. Two specific mechanisms are likely to be involved in producing panic in cattle. Excessive VGCC activity produces fear conditioning in animals and in humans (Kabir et al, J Physiol 2016; 20:5823-5837). EMFs also acting via excessive VGCC activity also produce large increases in the release of norepinephrine, the fight or flight hormone. These two are likely to act together to produce panic. The impact of EMFs on milk production in dairy cattle suggests that cattle may be quite sensitive to EMF effects. There are also several incidences of bizarre, aggressive behavior of cattle and sheep from Germany that may also be related to 5G radiation effects:

    Each of these needs to be clearly investigated for possible roles of 5G radiation. The 5th of these is the most clearly linked to 5G because the cow involved is from North Friesland, where cattle were, as noted in the second paragraph above, exposed to 5G radiation. Each of these must be investigated before any final conclusions can be drawn. However given that the “safety guidelines” have been repeatedly shown to fail to predict biological effects and therefore safety and that therefore, all assurances of safety based on those “safety guidelines” are fraudulent, and that there are plausible mechanisms by which EMF exposures can cause these effects, it is essential that the obvious possible cause, electromagnetic field exposures from 5G and/or high antenna density 4G radiation, should be extensively studied.

    There have been a series of very unusual human birth defects, in both Germany and France, involving aberrant limb development, such as aberrant hand and finger structure and even missing hands or missing arms.



    None of the many articles on these limb birth defects have suggested a link to 5G EMF exposures but such a link should be considered. The reason for that is that Bates et al, Ion Channels in Development and Cancer, Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2015; 31: 231-247 showed that elevation of both VGCC activity and also elevation of other voltage-gated ion channels can produce aberrant limb development. While the excessive activities of single channels do not produce aberrations identical to those in these recent human birth defects, a combination of excessive voltage-gated ion channel activities may well do so. Among the genetic studies showing that excessive activity of a particular VGCC produce limb developmental defects are the studies on Timothy syndrome. The Timothy syndrome mutation produces much higher VGCC activity because the closing mechanism of the channel is defective, such that activated channels close extremely slowly such that they produce much higher [Ca2+]i. The Timothy syndrome mutation produces not only limb development aberrations but also severe cases of autism and also cardiac effects. Most Timothy syndrome individuals die of apparent sudden cardiac death at age ranges circa 3 to 7 years old – the oldest known Timothy syndrome individual died at age 13. Here we have two effects produced or apparently produced by 5G exposures, the cardiac effects and the limb birth defects and a third proposed to be caused perinatal by 5G exposures, namely autism, all linked in their causation to VGCC activation.

    There were hundreds of birds that died of apparent sudden cardiac death during three days of 5G testing in a park near Rotterdam.
    There had been earlier stories published on these bird deaths where the industry denied doing 5G testing but in this article, it was shown that workers had been told to lie about those tests. It has been shown in rodents that MM-wave exposure (non-pulsed) can cause sudden cardiac death (Potekhina IL, Akoyev GN, Yenin LD, Oleyner 1992 Effects of low-intensity electromagnetic radiation in the millimeter range on the cardiovascular system of the white rat. Fiziol Zh 78:35-41 (in Russian)), making it very plausible that these bird deaths were in fact caused by 5G exposures. A second apparent large epidemic of birds falling out the sky of apparent cardiac death occurred last October shortly after the 5G ambulance was turned on in Coventry (see discussion above): , In October, there were already reports that birds fell down from the sky outside the Coventry hospital, after 5G antennas were turned on to enable the Smart Ambulance 5G wireless system in Coventry.

    See link:
    Insect will be massively impacted by 5G EMFs. In 2000 and 2001, two US patents issued for the use of millimeter wave EMFs as insecticides (patent #s 6,073,365 and 6,192,598). These were for using nonpulsed EMFs not the extraordinarily pulsed and therefore dangerous 5G EMFs. 5G will likely cause massive fires because of the impact of 5G EMFs on plants. EMFs impact plants producing large increases in intracellular calcium levels which act in turn to produce large increases in highly volatile and highly flammable terpenes. This, in turn, can make the plants burn as if they were sprayed with a light spray of gasoline. We may have seen the first 5G fires. Five cities along the east coast of South Korea, where some of the earliest 5G rollouts in the world occurred, had their 5G systems turned on – late April 3, 2019. The five unprecedented fires occurred in those same cities 1 ½ days later, April 5, 2019!
    Other possible 5G fires may have also occurred in 2019 in areas of Southern California where 5G was rolled out, including along I405 freeway.

    Role of 5G in the Coronavirus Epidemic in Wuhan China

    Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province in China, was chosen to be China’s first 5G “smart city” and the location of China’s first smart 5G highway. Wuhan is also the center of the horrendous coronavirus epidemic. The possible linkage between these two events was first discussed in an Oct. 31, 2019 article entitled: “Wuhan was the province where 5G was rolled out, now the center of deadly virus”
    The question that is being raised here is not whether 5G is responsible for the virus, but rather whether 5G radiation, acting via VGCC activation may be exacerbating the viral replication or the spread or lethality of the disease. Let’s backtrack and look at the recent history of 5G in Wuhan in order to get some perspective on those questions.

    An Asia Times article, dated Feb.12,2019
    Stated that there were 31 different 5G base stations (that is antennae) in Wuhan at the end of 2018. There were plans developed later such that approximately 10,000 5G antennae would be in place at the end of 2019, with most of those being on 5G LED smart street lamps. The first such smart street lamp was put in place on May 14, 2019
    But large numbers only started being put in place in October, 2019, such that there was a furious pace of such placement in the last 2 ½ months of 2019. These findings show that the rapid pace of the coronavirus epidemic developed at least roughly as the number of 5G antennae became extraordinarily high. So we have this finding that China’s 1st 5G smart city and smart highway is the epicenter of this epidemic and this finding that the epidemic only became rapidly more severe as the numbers of 5G antennae skyrocketed.

    Are these findings coincidental or does 5G have some causal role in exacerbating the coronavirus epidemic? In order to answer that question, we need to determine whether the downstream effects of VGCC activation exacerbate the viral replication, the effects of viral infection, especially those that have roles in the spread of the virus and also the mechanism by which this coronavirus causes death. Accordingly, the replication of the viral RNA is stimulated by oxidative stress: J Mol Biol. 2008 Nov 28;383(5):1081-96. Variable oligomerization modes in coronavirus non-structural protein 9. Ponnusamy R, Moll R, Weimar T, Mesters JR, Hilgenfeld R.
    Other aspects of viral replication including those involved in the spread of the virus are stimulated by increased intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i, oxidative stress, NF-kappaB elevation, inflammation and apoptosis, each of which are increased following EMF exposure. The first citation below shows an important role of VGCC activation in stimulating coronavirus infection.
    Virology. 2020 Jan 2;539:38-48. Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) modulates calcium influx to favor viral replication. Bai D, et al.
    J Virol. 2011 May;85(9):4234-45. Distinct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-induced acute lung injury pathways in two different nonhuman primate species. Smits SL, et al.
    Cell Calcium. 2018 Nov;75:30-41. NAADP-dependent Ca2+ signaling regulates Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus pseudovirus translocation through the endolysosomal system. Gunaratne GS, et al.
    J Virol. 2011 May;85(9):4234-45. Distinct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-induced acute lung injury pathways in two different nonhuman primate species. Smits SL, et al.
    Proteome Sci. 2011 Mar 8;9:11. Proteomic analysis of chicken embryonic trachea and kidney tissues after infection in ovo by avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus. Cao Z, et al.
    Res Vet Sci. 2015 Jun;100:12-7. Serum biomarkers of oxidative stress in cats with feline infectious peritonitis. Tecles F, et al.
    J Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 15;197(6):812-6. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency enhances human coronavirus infection. Wu YH et al.
    J Virol. 1998 Jun;72(6):4918-24. Transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus induces programmed cell death in infected cells through a caspase-dependent pathway. Eleouet JF, et al.

    The predominant cause of death from this coronavirus is pneumonia. Pneumonia is greatly exacerbated by each of those five downstream effects of VGCC activation, excessive intracellular calcium, oxidative stress, NF-kappaB elevation, inflammation and apoptosis. The first of the citations listed below shows that calcium channel blockers, the same type of drugs that block EMF effects, are useful in the treatment of pneumonia. This predicts that EMFs, acting via VGCC activation, will produce increasingly severe pneumonia and therefore 5G radiation as well as other types of EMFs may well increase pneumonia deaths.

    Zheng et al. 2016 Preadmission Use of Calcium Channel Blockers and Outcomes After Hospitalization With Pneumonia: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Cohort Study. Am J Ther. 2017 Jan/Feb;24(1):e30- e38.
    Fang et al. 2017 Pneumolysin-Dependent Calpain Activation and Interleukin-1α Secretion in Macrophages Infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 2017 Aug 18;85(9). pii: e00201-17.

    Fettel et al. 2019 Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) induces potent anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and in vivo by S1P receptor 4-mediated suppression of 5-lipoxygenase activity. FASEB J. 2019 Feb;33(2):1711- 1726.
    Liu and Shi. 2019 Calcium-activated chloride channel regulator 1 (CLCA1): More than a regulator of chloride transport and mucus production. World Allergy Organ J. 2019 Nov 29;12(11):100077.

    Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 18;8(1):15393. Surfactant protein D attenuates acute lung and kidney injuries in pneumonia-induced sepsis through modulating apoptosis, inflammation and NF-κB signaling. Du J, et al.
    Curr Neurovasc Res. 2020 Jan 28. MicroRNA (miR)-429 promotes inflammatory injury by targeting kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) in neonatal pneumonia. Zhang L, et al.
    Life Sci. 2019 Jul 1;228:189-197. Long noncoding RNA SNHG16 targets miR-146a-5p/CCL5 to regulate LPS-induced WI-38 cell apoptosis and inflammation in acute pneumonia. Zhou Z, et al.

    These all argue that 5G radiation is likely to greatly exacerbate the spread of the coronavirus and to greatly increase the lethality of the infections produced by it. The good news is that it is likely that those of us that live in areas with no 5G radiation and who avoid other EMFs wherever possible will probably escape much of the impacts of this prospective global pandemic. It is highly probable that one of the best things Wuhan can do to control the epidemic in the city is to turn off the 4G/5G system.
    In summary, we have a series of 5G linked events that have occurred in more than one situation, where we have plausible mechanisms by which 5G radiation can cause them and where we know that counter arguments are based on “safety guidelines” which fail to predict biological effects and are, therefore, fraudulent.

    These include:

    1. Neurological/neuropsychiatric effects reported both in Switzerland and in Stuttgart Germany, effects similar to but more severe than effects caused by other EMF exposures.

    2. Three suicides within 11 days of each other in the first 5G ambulance personnel

    3. Cardiac effects also reported in both in Switzerland and in Stuttgart Germany, effects similar to those found in in humans in following other EMF exposures as well as in animal experimental studies.

    4. Two cases of massive, almost instantaneous 5G bird sudden cardiac death effects, one in the Netherlands and one in the UK.

    5. We have cases of mass panic in cattle, as well as unusual aggressive behavior in cattle and sheep.

    6. We have multiple cases of human limb birth defects in France and Germany.

    7. We have multiple cases of apparent 5G fires in Korea and in Southern California.

    8. We have large apparent increases in EHS in Stuttgart Germany. While this is a single example, to my knowledge, similar although more slowly developing examples of EHS have been shown to occur in occupational EMF exposure studies and in the two smart meter studies. The case may be weaker here, because it is based solely on the Stuttgart example, but is still substantial.

    9. Four downstream effects produced by EMFs acting via VGCC activation, oxidative stress, NFkappaB elevation, inflammation and apoptosis greatly stimulate both coronavirus infectious process, including aspects involved in viral spreading and also pneumonia, the predominant cause of death in the Wuhan coronavirus epidemic. It follows from this that the “coincidence” that Wuhan, China’s first smart 5G city and location of China’s first 5G highway and the other “coincidence” that the epidemic was first discovered when high 5G antenna densification started, with the severity of the epidemic and death rate increasing very rapidly as circe 8,000 5G antennae were built all over the city of Wuhan. It is, therefore, highly probable that these are not coincidences but rather involve causal roles of 5G EMFs.

    In each of these cases, as stated above, we have plausible mechanisms by which each of them can be produced by 5G EMF exposure and where all contrary claims based on “safety guidelines” are simply fraudulent. In the eight of these of these effects (#8 being an apparent exception), we have a prima facie case for 5G causation. And let me repeat that any effects seen with the initial “rollout” of 5G radiation will be a tiny fraction of those predicted by a mature 5G system interacting with the “internet of things” because any initial 5G system has very little to communicate with on initial rollout and therefore will produce only a tiny fraction of highly pulsed EMF effects of such a mature system. The very high impacts of modulating and nonmodulating pulses mean that the extraordinarily high level of modulating pulses in 5G radiation, with those pulses communicating vast amounts of information per second, means that 5G radiation is vastly more dangerous than the exposures we previously have had and those previous exposures have already having massive impacts on us and on other organisms.

    The eight apparent 5G effects listed above do not include other predicted massive effects of 5G radiation where we have no evidence of whether they are occurring or not but where we have evidence of important causal roles of other EMF exposures.

    These include:

    1. Massive impacts on male reproduction, where 5G radiation may well produce very rapid crashes in male reproduction to close to zero.

    2. Universal of near universal very early onset Alzheimer’s dementias (AD). Here we know that all you have to do to produce universal or near universal very early onset AD in a rat model, is to give a series of EMF pulses during one day and even during one second. If you give pulses every day, you get universal or near universal AD in six month old rats (roughly the equivalent age of a 12 year old child).

    3. Universal or near universal autism. We know, from genetic studies, that human autism is caused by excessive VGCC activity and because this is the primary mechanism of action of EMFs, including MM-wave EMFs of 5G, it is highly plausible that the very highly pulsed 5G may cause universal or near universal autism. 4. Very high levels of germ line mutations caused by the impact of 5G radiation acting via VGCC activation on the DNA of human sperm and on the DNA of human oocytes. What this argues is that what little human reproduction survives the effects of #1 may well be heavily impacted by very high levels of de novo mutation.

    Possible causation of each of these by 5G radiation could have been tested by animal model studies, before any 5G rollout. It is my opinion that it is an atrocity of almost unbelievable proportions that no such tests have been done. All of this argues that 5G presents threats of the sort that we have never seen before – multiple imminent existential threats to our survival.

    Source
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 4th September 2020 at 10:34.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  35. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Luke Holiday (4th September 2020), mountain_jim (4th September 2020)

  36. Link to Post #779
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,552
    Thanked 124,909 times in 20,684 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    🤔 Did we ever had a real "Balanced" #5G vs #Stop5G report in Mainstream Media? ... Still no real (unedited) MSM debate allowed, why? ... Even if 5G will impact ALL of Humanity and all Biological Life forms forever!

    ⚠️ ICNIRP and/or W.H.O. and/or FCC discussed in any Pro 5G video or MSM articles? 🌐 Always share these 58 Stop5G links

    01. DrMartinPall-vs-ICNIRP (PDF)
    02. WHO-5G-EMFs-CoverUp
    03. MSM-Bias-Fact-Check-5G
    04. Stop5G-vs-ICNIRP-Corruption
    05. ICNIRP-Corruption-Dossier-01
    06. MSM-ICNIRP-Deceptive-Content
    07. FCC A Captured Agency
    08. Scientific-American-5G-Warning
    09. 5G-Warning-by-IEEE
    10. 5G-EU-Science-Appeal
    11. 2020-Science2Stop5G (PDF)
    12. Science2Stop5G-2020
    13. 5GviolatesNurembergCode (PDF)
    14. WHO-and-5G-Corporatism
    15. Stop5G-Scientists-and-Doctors
    16. Gov-Ignore-Own-EMF-Evidence
    17. ICNIRP-5G-Safety-Deceptions-II
    18. Stop5G-CHD-vs-FCC
    19. Smartphone-Radiation-Law
    20. Legitimate-5G-Concerns
    21. 5G-Health-Risks-Warning
    22. 5G-Russian-Roulette
    23. Top100-Science2Stop5G-Videos
    24. Stop5G-Disband-ICNIRP
    25. NEPA-vs-FCC-Stop5G
    26. 5G-Can-Damage-Eyes-Skin
    27. Sub-TerraHerz-5G-Dangers
    28. 5G-1st-Safety-2nd-FCC-Policy
    29. Green-Party-and-5G
    30. Non-Ionizing-Radiation-Lie (PDF)
    31. EU-Greens-vs-ICNIRP
    32. Devra-Davis-PhD-Science2Stop5G (PDF)
    33. ICNIRP-Conflict-of-Interest (PDF)
    34. ICNIRP-SCAM
    35. ICNIRP-Serves-5G-Industry
    36. 5G-Massive-Health-Experiment
    37. FCC-5G-Lawsuit
    38. 400-MDs-Against-FCC-5G-Plans
    39. 5G-in-5-minutes
    40. Stop5G-Victories
    41. Stop5G-Brainstorm
    42. ICNIRP-Needs-Your-Ignorance
    43. FCC-Ignores-SAR-Children
    44. EMFs-and-Wildlife-Stop5G
    45. Specs-Beamforming-5G-Towers
    46. Stop5G-MSM-Straw-Man-Fallacy
    47. Quantum-Fractal-Antennas-vs-5G
    48. NewNormal-was-all-Planned
    49. Corrupt-Perception-Management
    50. July2020-Science2Stop5G-Papers (PDF)
    51. Non-Ionizing-Lie-Explained (PDF)
    52. Science2Stop5G-Legal-Action (PDF)
    53. 17-Legit-5G-Questions
    54. EU-5G-PDF-File-2020 (PDF)
    55. Stop5G-B4-its-Irreversible
    56. Bogus-5G-is-Virus-Exposed
    57. WhatTheyDoNotWantYouToSee
    58. Telecoms Are Losing the 5G Battles

    🤔 99,9% chance they (MSM) can NOT summarize above 58 links ... because their minds are already made up! ... 1000s of mainstream publications are UNBALANCED ... and the moment they decide to make it "balanced" and allow better more "honest" representation of those who are against #5G they are MOST LIKELY able to spin it and to manipulate it in such a way you have the illusion it was "balanced" but we know better as I stated: they can not even make an honest representation / summary of above 58 links! >>> They are corporate pushed Perception Managers!

    🌐 If you repeat the corporate pushed narratives over and over and over and over ... that means it takes almost NO EFFORT to explain THEIR views later on ... as most sheeple were already mass conditioned 24/7 why "5G is okay" ... but when you NEVER made an honest summery of above 58 links it is much much harder for the masses to fully comprehend what really is going on ...

    🌐 So the moment an alleged (assumed) "balanced" report appears THEY have already had the time to mass brainwash 1000s of times before the "balanced" report even started. That is why I call it the illusion of "free (mainstream) press" or "free (mainstream) media" totally rigged by corporate interests!

    🌐 That is why you never find any real (unedited) 5G health risks debate in mainstream media! ... They KNOW they gonna lose face.

    ps. Some of the 58 links do not work anymore because Facebook decided to BLOCK all Fb Posts containing Stop5G.net non-commercial site build by me with NO ADDS no sponsors no connections with anyone ... no bullying ... no racism ... no calling for any form of violence ... etc. etc. etc. ... Lucky for me I have a backup for everything I have done on Facebook so I will FIX some broken links very soon and UPDATE the links to work just fine again.

    Facebook is KNOWN to be completely wilful slave to W.H.O. (Funded by a.o. Bill Gates & China).
    • Bogus "5G = virus" narrative & Dis-info memes exposed!
    ⚠️ In 2017 & 2018 before the mass C0VlD HYSTERIA ... I stated multiple times ON RECORD: That millions of new #5G Cell Towers & Smartphones could/can have an impact when we have a "common cold" or "common flu" ... I NEVER said nor claimed "5G = virus" ... Vast majority of our Stop5G Fb Group members neither!

    🌐 I also stated that the increase of more and more Erratic Pulsed Microwaves (Non-Native EMFs) Cumulative Radiation everywhere like: 4G WiFi & 5G AFFECTS our >> immune system << as it is shown in Declassified Navy Documents calling it "Microwave Sickness Symptoms" + 1000s other PubMed Peer Reviewed #Science2Stop5G Scientific publications like Dr. Martin Pall ... This evidence is NEVER allowed to be discussed in ANY mainstream media!

    ⚠️ This very important symptoms list has similarities with "flu-like symptoms" so WHY does the Mass Mainstream Media ONLY focus on the BOGUS "5G = virus narrative" false assumption we suppose to "agree" with? ... Which is an obvious LIE & Straw-man Argument Fallacy Tactic!

    🤔 How many "5G = Virus Memes" are NOT made by real #Stop5G Activists but by those who GAIN to flood social media with DIS-INFO? Then use it to demonize ANYONE discussing 5G + Flu connection we already discussed in 2017 & 2018 ... What if they knew in advance 5G will make ALL common flu & common cold more dangerous for the weak, the elderly and those having multiple other conditions? ... If so, THAT explains the FRAMING of Stop5G Activists to make us go silent (mass censorship).

    🦋 Now you know WHY Mainstream Media never allowed a real uncensored (live) debate between Pro 5G vs Stop5G Activists ever last 4 years! ... They FEAR US being treated fair & with 100% transparency for all to see.

    If you have ANY EVIDENCE that last 4 years Mainstream Media allowed an honest real open debate where a summary does 100% justice what we stand for ... Feel free to share that evidence here in comments. If you are NOT able to do that ... does that, at least, make you think & question how the masses are conditioned in a very narrow (corporate approved) narrative?

    cheers,
    John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳
    Founder of Fb.com/groups/Stop5G
    Stop5G.net & Twitter.com/Stop5G
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 8th August 2021 at 16:52.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  37. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    greybeard (4th September 2020)

  38. Link to Post #780
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    15th January 2018
    Location
    Arizona
    Language
    English
    Posts
    538
    Thanks
    911
    Thanked 2,145 times in 461 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Can 5 G produce a Bradykinin storm?

    1. Exomatrix article post:
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1375925

    2. https://electricalvitality.com/vgcc/

    3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657726/
    Kinins— The Kallikrein-Kinin System and Oxidative Stress

    4. Bradykinin Protects Against Oxidative Stress–Induced Endothelial Cell Senescence
    https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1...AHA.108.123729

    The Supercomputer article outlined a CV 19/Bradykinin storm hypothesis. Can 5 G produce the same sx's? The answer is yes - based on connecting the dots of the scientific research below:

    A. Reference 1: John's article reveals 5 G's primary negative affect on human health is the disruption of Voltage-Gated Calcium channels (VGCC).

    B. Reference 2: Reveals disruption of VGCC causes an increase in oxidative stress.

    C. Reference 3/4: Pub med journal articles revealing oxidative stress causes an increase in Bradykinin/Kinin (BK) release. The more oxidative stress the greater the BK release.

    In Summary: 5G EMF exposure = Disruption of VGCC's = Increased Oxidative stress in the body = Increased Bradykinin release

    Blessings Luke
    Last edited by Luke Holiday; 4th September 2020 at 16:02.

  39. The Following User Says Thank You to Luke Holiday For This Post:

    ExomatrixTV (4th September 2020)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 39 of 53 FirstFirst 1 29 39 49 53 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts