Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

[ExomatrixTV]

⚠️ The Big Tech Lobby pushing #5G on both sides is enormous and if Trump would not represent the "bi-partisan majority vote" he would face endless lawsuits and called a "dictator" ...

People who assume it is Trump "who is behind it all" are in my view beyond stupid & pathetic in my book.

It is never "Trump's FCC" never is never was ... as he himself is NOT a "science expert" nor an "health expert" he is just TOLD "what to do" just like ALL other Presidents before him.

There are many Republicans and many Democrats on BOTH sides PUSHING #5G long long time ... they represent the majority (not Trump).

Quote: "Trump FCC's Latest Lies" unquote. is not correct nor was it "Obama's FCC" as we are ruled by Bi-Partisan Technocracy Lobbyists like: Google, Apple, IBM, AT&T, Verizon, Samsung etc. etc. and most of these Big-Tech Lobbyists are Pro Democrats thus Bi-Partisan 5G insanity is inevitable.






John Kuhles - October 31, 2020

• Founder Fb.com/groups/Stop5G
• Stop5G.net & Twitter.com/Stop5G
• Bitchute.com/channel/Stop5Gdotnet

[Hughe]

5G antennas may be banned at French airports and nearby residential areas as they could interfere with aircraft altimeters. Poor old telcos! They deplore the fact that this could set off a whole new round of conspiracy theories about 5G. So let's go for it folks!

L'installation des antennes 5G risque de n'être pas permise non seulement dans les aéroports mais aussi dans les agglomérations qui se trouvent à proximité. Les pauvres opérateurs ! Ils se plaignent en particulier que cette histoire risque de faire repartir de plus belle les théories du complot sur la 5G. Alors, allons-y, mes amis ! (Version française se trouve en bas et ci-jointe.)
5G: Civil aviation sparks controversy with telecoms companies

Are 5G antennas installed at airports likely to disrupt guidance systems inside aircraft? This is what the DGAC (French Civil Aviation Authority) is suggesting, based on a report stating that the 3.7-3.9 GHz band to be used for 5G could create a "major risk" for aircraft radio altimeters, which also use these frequencies.

This objection from civil aviation has angered the telecoms companies as it may result in antennas not being allowed to be installed not only in airports but also in nearby urban areas. "Additional technical analyses are being undertaken to ensure the compatibility of these 5G antennas with the needs of civil aviation," said Philippe Barnola, DGAC Deputy Director.

The four telecoms companies (Orange, SFR, Bouygues Telecoms and Free) were all the more put out by the announcement coming after the frequency auctions that raised 2.786 billion euros for the state.

"In the end, it's exhausting"

They sent a letter to Cédric O, Minister in charge of Digitisation and Electronic Communications, expressing their amazement at hearing of this risk and discussing the ramifications.

According to Les Echos, SFR (Altice Group, which also owns BFM Business and BFMTV) threatened "not to pay the 118 million euros due to the state until the situation is resolved". For its part, Bouygues Telecom demanded to be compensated "in proportion to these new constraints".

Contacted by AFP [Agence France presse], SFR did not provide a comment, while Bouygues Telecom said it had not asked for "any compensation", but that "this complexity should be taken into account" in the deployment of 5G.

"Having reservations is legitimate, but 7% of the world is already covered in 5G. There has never been a single problem with planes," one telco told Les Echos. "In the end, it's exhausting. This situation could set off a whole new round of conspiracy theories about 5G".

Telcos also say that they should have been told about this situation earlier. They submitted their first applications for authorization for 5G antennas in the 3.5 GHz band a few days after the end of the auction, on 20 October, and the first responses to the telecoms companies were made Thursday, said the DGAC.

5G : l'aviation civile ouvre une polémique avec les opérateurs
https://www.lesechos.fr/tech-medias/...oports-1266848

Les antennes 5G installées dans les aéroports risquent-elle de perturber les systèmes de guidage à l'intérieur des avions? C'est ce que soulève la DGAC (direction générale de l'aviation civile) en s'appuyant sur un rapport affirmant que la bande des 3,7-3,9 Gigaghertz utilisable pour la 5G pourrait créer un "risque majeur" pour les radioaltimètres des avions qui passent aussi par ces fréquences.

Cette réserve de l'aviation civile a provoqué la colère des opérateurs. En effet, elle risque de ne pas permettre d'installer des antennes non seulement dans les aéroports mais aussi dans les agglomérations qui se trouvent à proximité.

"Des analyses techniques complémentaires sont en cours pour s'assurer de la compatibilité de ces stations 5G avec les besoins de l'aviation civile", a précisé aux Echos Philippe Barnola, sous directeur à la DGAC.

Cette annonce a d'autant plus heurté les quatre opérateurs (Orange, SFR, Bouygues Telecoms et Free) après les enchères de fréquences qui ont permis à l'Etat d'engranger 2,786 milliards d'euros.

"A la fin, c'est usant"

Il ont adressé une lettre à Cédric O, ministre chargé du Numérique et des Communications électroniques, pour l'informer de leur étonnement sur ce risque et prévenir des conséquences.

Selon Les Echos, SFR (groupe Altice, également propriétaire de BFM Business et BFMTV) menacerait "de ne pas verser les 118 millions d'euros dus à l'État tant que la situation n'est pas résolue". De son côté, Bouygues Telecom exigerait d'être indemnisé "à proportion de ces nouvelles contraintes".

Contactés par l'AFP, SFR n'a pas fait de commentaire, tandis que Bouygues Telecom a indiqué n'avoir demandé "aucune indemnisation", mais la "prise en compte de cette complexité" dans le cadre du déploiement de la 5G.

"Avoir des réserves, c'est légitime, mais 7 % du monde est déjà couvert en 5G. Il n'y a jamais eu le moindre problème avec les avions", a répondu un opérateur aux Echos. "A la fin, c'est usant. Le risque, avec cette histoire, c'est que les théories du complot sur la 5G ne repartent de plus belle".

Les opérateurs disent aussi avoir été mis face cette situation tardivement. Ils ont soumis leurs premières demandes d'autorisation pour les antennes 5G dans la bande 3,5 GhZ quelques jours après la fin des enchères le 20 octobre et les premiers retours ont été faits jeudi aux opérateurs, précise la DGAC.

[Hughe]

Tutzing, Bavaria, Germany adopts 5G moratorium
https://www.diagnose-funk.org/publik...il?newsid=1627

AUTOMATIC (VERY ROUGH) TRANSLATION

Tutzing (Starnberger see): Green, Free voters, the SPD and the ÖDP decide a Moratorium for 5G+
Council calls for technology assessment, Preparedness, and mobile concept

In Tutzing (Bavaria) by setting four groups for a Moratorium on the high-frequency technology. The Süddeutsche Zeitung reported:

"Transmission equipment for mobile radio technology, with more than 3.8 GHz supports the municipality on the entire municipal territory, including their properties in the future, only "if the safety of people and environment by industry and government is proven by independent scientists to reliably". This Moratorium, initiated by the citizens initiative for 5G-free Tutzing, went through on Tuesday in the municipal Council with 10:8 votes.At the same time as comprehensively as possible to ensure, powerful, and as far as possible, on fixed network technology based broadband Tutzings and its districts. In addition, if you want to develop, with the experts in a "mobile precautionary approach" - is to minimize a positive planning, where plants could be set up for the purposes of the municipality, the pollution of citizens.In the emotional debate, the Doctor and a Councilor of the Free voters, Verena Jordan-Marstrander, pointed out that there is yet "no evidence for the safety" of high frequency mobile radio technology. You have "significant health concerns". Autonomous Driving, real-time transfers, and new devices - "do we need this? We want to do that?", you asked ... ÖDP-councillor Caroline pitcher that followed for many years is critical to the mobile development at the place, knocked on the precautionary principle.Accordingly, the community of the existence must bear - such as the health care of their citizens. Jug according to 700 Tutzinger have signed the appeal for the Moratorium, including 40 professionals."(12.11.2020)

The FDP and CSU criticized the decision sharply.

Source and more information: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen...t-5g-1.5112864
The decision of the municipal Council leads the network to discussions. The citizens ' initiative responds based on the allegations, the criticism of 5G is based on unfounded, Yes, esoteric statements.

Citizens ' initiative 5G-free Tutzing on 13.11.2020 - 21:47
Only the specified contribution helps, unfortunately, not an industry-independent representation of the Pros and Cons, quite the contrary! The specified source is not obtained in any case, the impression of a scientifically sound analysis.
Why the high number of scientific studies, as well as for example. Findings of the technology, it is not a result of Committee of the Federal government, the Scientific service of the European Parliament, to name just a few, as esoteric estimate is for us to understand.

(1) A technology assessment has not yet taken place. The HEAD of the technology Committee OF the Bundestag, Prof. Armin Grunwald, the consequences of 5G called a "Experiment on people". ( see Prof. Armin Grunwald, head of the office for technology assessment at the German Bundestag, July 2019, available at https://kurzelinks.de/hv8f)

(2) On the basis of the classification of the previous technique, the radiation from a 2G (GSM), 3G (UMTS), 4G (LTE) and Wi-Fi as a "possible carcinogen" (category 2B) by the IARC of the WHO scientific services of the European Union in policy papers for the members warn of the potential health risks of 5G.

(3) the SCIENTIFIC SERVICE OF the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT in February 2020 on 5G there is no evidence as to its safety. "The current scientific literature shows that there is a permanently acting wireless radiation probably has biological effects, which is the case for the special features of the 5G in a special way: the combination of millimeter-wave, a higher frequency, the number of transmitters and the number of Connections.Various studies suggest that 5G the health of people, plants, animals, insects and microbes would affect – and that 5G a cautious approach would be appropriate, since it is an untested technology is." cf. ibid. (Briefing of the EPRS), p. 1, document available at https://kurzelinks.de/f0w7

(4) Interestingly, recommends that even the PRESIDENT OF the GERMAN FEDERAL office FOR radiation protection (BfS), Fr. Dr. Inge Paulini in 3sat on 25.02.2019 a cautious approach under a provisional exemption of "sensitive places" of 5G.
Video available at https://www.3sat.de/wissen/nano/gefa...play&obj=79212 (available to 26.02.2024)

(5) it is Interesting that the French city of Lille for a Moratorium on 5G decides about 600 municipalities in Italy, the million cities of Marseille and Lyon, in addition to other 9 cities in France with a 5G-expansion of stop demand, as Brussels and Geneva. (cf. https://www.diagnose-funk.org/publik...il&newsid=1613)

(6) For further Research, I also recommend "what time is it in Germany again a radiation protection?", Open letter with options for action to the President of the Federal office for radiation protection, Dr. Inge Paulini, by Jörn Gutbier / Peter Hensinger, diagnosis:radio e. V., p. 2 and p. 3, document available at https://kurzelinks.de/vtzw

Come with questions to us: Tutzing@posteo.de">5G-freiesTutzing@posteo.de
For more information and resources see also under https://www.5g-freies-tutzing.de

Source: on-the-spot News Tutzing: https://www.vorort.news/tutzing/komm...edenklichkeit/

¤=[Post Update]=¤

French Court of Appeal: Installation of "smart" meters is not mandatory in European law

Good news from France about "smart" meters. The Court of Appeal of Bordeaux, France, has confirmed that the installation of a "smart" meter is not mandatory. The court has stated that,

"Contrary to what is claimed by Enedis [a French electricity company], no legal or regulatory text, European or national, requires Enedis, a private commercial company, public service concession-holder, to install smart meters at the homes of individuals".
This confirmation benefits all consumers, even non-victims of microwaves.

The court also recognized an unlawful function added to the "smart" meter by Enedis which, according to the former director of the "smart" meter programme, enabled surveillance of the starting or stopping of certain appliances in the home, such as a dishwasher.

The court ruled as follows: "This function, described as "intrusive" by Enedis' opposing parties, is confirmed by the publication of the university thesis carried out under a contract with the Research and Development Department of Smart Meters, which states that "The characteristics of the electrical consumption of a device in the short moment after it is turned on can be used to identify the device". "[...] It must therefore be held that Enedis failed to fulfil its obligation to provide information as defined by the provisions of Article L. 111-1 of the Consumer Code."

So here we have the elements of rights that we have talked so much about. Accordingly: no penalty on refusal to allow the installation of a "smart" meter.
Fees for manual readings of meters will be slightly increased to about € 30 per year, instead of about € 21 usually.

No charge can be made for installation because it is already included in the ENEDIS contract for the maintenance of the network, and it is even less justified if you refused the "smart" meter.

Thanks to STOP LINKY VAR & PACA for this good news

https://4muxq.r.ag.d.sendibm3.com/mk...R9cBL4BsGrnZw4

Version française originelle disponible à https://4muxq.r.ag.d.sendibm3.com/mk...R9cBL4BsGrnZw4

Une bonne nouvelle à vous annoncer, une fois n'est pas coutume. !
La Cour d'appel de Bordeaux confirme que l'installation du Linky n'est pas obligatoire.

En effet, la Cour rappelle que : «contrairement à ce qu'affirme la société Enedis, aucun texte légal ou règlementaire, européen ou national n'impose à Enedis, société commerciale privée, concessionnaire du service public, d'installer au domicile des particuliers des compteurs Linky ».

Cette affirmation bénéficie à tous les consommateurs, même non-victimes des ondes.

La Cour reconnaît par ailleurs une fonction illicite ajoutée au Linky par Enedis qui permet, de l'aveu-même de l'ancien directeur du programme Linky, de visualiser le démarrage ou l'arrêt de certaines installations du domicile, comme un lave-vaisselle.

La Cour tranche :«Cette fonction, qualifiée d'"intrusive" par les parties adverses d'Enedis, est confirmée par la publication de la thèse universitaire réalisée dans le cadre d'un contrat avec le service de Recherche et Développement de Linky qui affirme que "les caractéristiques de la consommation électrique d'un appareil pendant le court instant qui suit sa mise sous tension peuvent être utilisées à l'identification de l'appareil". [...] Dès lors, il y a lieu de considérer que la société Enedis a failli à son obligation d'information telle que définie par les dispositions de l'article L.111-1 du code de la consommation. ».

Voici donc confirmés les éléments de droits dont nous vous avons tant parlé. En conséquence : aucune pénalité sur le refus.

La relève à pied sera légèrement augmentée environ 30 € par an, au lieu de 21 € environ habituellement.

La pose ne pourra vous être facturée car déjà incluse dans le contrat d'ENEDIS pour l'entretien du réseau, et donc encore moins si vous l'avez refusé.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Good news from France about "smart" meters. The Court of Appeal of Bordeaux, France, has confirmed that the installation of a "smart" meter is not mandatory. The court has stated that,

"Contrary to what is claimed by Enedis [a French electricity company], no legal or regulatory text, European or national, requires Enedis, a private commercial company, public service concession-holder, to install smart meters at the homes of individuals".
This confirmation benefits all consumers, even non-victims of microwaves.

The court also recognized an unlawful function added to the "smart" meter by Enedis which, according to the former director of the "smart" meter programme, enabled surveillance of the starting or stopping of certain appliances in the home, such as a dishwasher.

The court ruled as follows: "This function, described as "intrusive" by Enedis' opposing parties, is confirmed by the publication of the university thesis carried out under a contract with the Research and Development Department of Smart Meters, which states that "The characteristics of the electrical consumption of a device in the short moment after it is turned on can be used to identify the device". "[...] It must therefore be held that Enedis failed to fulfil its obligation to provide information as defined by the provisions of Article L. 111-1 of the Consumer Code."

So here we have the elements of rights that we have talked so much about. Accordingly: no penalty on refusal to allow the installation of a "smart" meter.
Fees for manual readings of meters will be slightly increased to about € 30 per year, instead of about € 21 usually.

No charge can be made for installation because it is already included in the ENEDIS contract for the maintenance of the network, and it is even less justified if you refused the "smart" meter.

Thanks to STOP LINKY VAR & PACA for this good news

https://4muxq.r.ag.d.sendibm3.com/mk...R9cBL4BsGrnZw4

Version française originelle disponible à https://4muxq.r.ag.d.sendibm3.com/mk...R9cBL4BsGrnZw4

Une bonne nouvelle à vous annoncer, une fois n'est pas coutume. !
La Cour d'appel de Bordeaux confirme que l'installation du Linky n'est pas obligatoire.

En effet, la Cour rappelle que : «contrairement à ce qu'affirme la société Enedis, aucun texte légal ou règlementaire, européen ou national n'impose à Enedis, société commerciale privée, concessionnaire du service public, d'installer au domicile des particuliers des compteurs Linky ».

Cette affirmation bénéficie à tous les consommateurs, même non-victimes des ondes.

La Cour reconnaît par ailleurs une fonction illicite ajoutée au Linky par Enedis qui permet, de l'aveu-même de l'ancien directeur du programme Linky, de visualiser le démarrage ou l'arrêt de certaines installations du domicile, comme un lave-vaisselle.

La Cour tranche :«Cette fonction, qualifiée d'"intrusive" par les parties adverses d'Enedis, est confirmée par la publication de la thèse universitaire réalisée dans le cadre d'un contrat avec le service de Recherche et Développement de Linky qui affirme que "les caractéristiques de la consommation électrique d'un appareil pendant le court instant qui suit sa mise sous tension peuvent être utilisées à l'identification de l'appareil". [...] Dès lors, il y a lieu de considérer que la société Enedis a failli à son obligation d'information telle que définie par les dispositions de l'article L.111-1 du code de la consommation. ».

Voici donc confirmés les éléments de droits dont nous vous avons tant parlé. En conséquence : aucune pénalité sur le refus.

La relève à pied sera légèrement augmentée environ 30 € par an, au lieu de 21 € environ habituellement.

La pose ne pourra vous être facturée car déjà incluse dans le contrat d'ENEDIS pour l'entretien du réseau, et donc encore moins si vous l'avez refusé.

[Hughe]

CLAIRE EDWARDS INTERVIEW

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lXdcULTaa60

--

My comment:

- 5G is part of the depopulation agenda.
- Advancement of science and technology already made the corporations getting rid of ninety nine percent of work forces. One capable technician or operator can do the same quantity of work that required thousands of workers two decade ago.

[onawah]

Industry-Sponsored Journal Publishes Scientific Paper Questioning Safety of 5G Radiation
11/25/20
https://www.5gcrisis.com/post/indust...f-5g-radiation

"A new peer-reviewed paper, "Human Electromagnetic Field Exposure in 5G at 28 GHz," questions the safety of exposure to 5G millimeter waves.
The authors found in a simulation study that use of a 5G cell phone at 28 GHz could exceed ICNIRP (i.e. international) radio frequency exposure limits when held at 8 centimeters (i.e., 3 inches) or closer to the head or body.
Read Dr. Joel Moskowitz's commentary on the paper, as well as key excerpts from the original paper, here:
https://www.saferemr.com/2017/09/5g-...armful-to.html
Dr. Moskowitz is the Director of the Center for Family and Community Health at UC Berkeley's School of Public Health."

[Rawhide68]

Klaus Schwabb what a guy, the film industry turned him down, the next James Bond film was just not in reach for him.
So he took it out on "te world" instead.

Academy of Fine Arts Vienna "In 1907 and 1908, young Adolf Hitler, who had come from Linz, was twice denied admission to the drawing class."
So he took it out on "te world" instead.

[ExomatrixTV]

Project Pandora?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=RC6wn5a01X4

DOCTORS WARNING! ""No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe":

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=OeGT72WhVEc

[ExomatrixTV]

Nurse: ‘Covid’ was a Lie, but now people are ‘throwing blood clots’ all over - David Icke:


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/VHh2APZOGCYi

[onawah]

Landmark 5G Study Highlights Health Threats
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
December 16, 2020

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Newest data from the New Hampshire legislative commission confirms wireless technology produces significant negative effect on humans, animals, insects and plants
In the race for hyperfast internet speed and connectivity, experts are making comparisons between the release of 5G and the lies told by the tobacco and oil industries
The structure required to support 5G will place cell antenna ports close to your home and workplace, making it nearly impossible to avoid and raising your risk of excessive oxidative stress that may lead to anxiety, depression and Alzheimer's
It is important to get involved in helping to prevent implementation of 5G by contacting your local lawmakers and signing local petitions. Consider taking steps in your home to reduce exposure

Flying under the radar, so to speak, during the media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic, is the rollout of a hyperfast speed 5G wireless network. As millions of Americans are suddenly working remotely, it has proven to be a powerful opportunity for regulators to move 5G forward. Yet, in the face of expanding wireless connections, a landmark study recommends reducing exposure.

Despite concern by many experts, the implementation is moving forward under the guise of bringing a faster and more efficient internet, at any cost. The term 5G stands for the fifth generation of wireless access, which Jonathon Adelstein, head of the Wireless Infrastructure Association, characterizes as “4G on steroids.”1 The association represents nearly 200 companies in the telecommunications industry.2

However, Adelstein’s characterization of 4G on steroids is not quite accurate. While the 4G network uses under 6 gigahertz (GHz) on the radio frequency spectrum, 5G will occupy from 30 GHz to 300 GHz, which are shorter millimeter wavelengths.3 The health effects of consistent exposure to pulses of these wavelengths have not been thoroughly studied, but the initial evidence shows it is likely dangerous.

If faster speed and reliability are truly the end goals, then fiber optic connections are a far better and safer way forward. It's not the faster speeds of 5G that are of concern to scientists but, rather, the distribution of wireless data when in most cases it could be routed more easily and less expensively over fiber optic cables.

Newest Data Confirms Past Evidence
Following the passage of New Hampshire House Bill 522, the New Hampshire legislative Commission to Study the Environmental and Health Effects of Evolving 5G Technology was formed.4 The commission was engaged to “study the environmental and health effects of 5G wireless technology in 2019.”5

The commission was made up of 13 members whose education included epidemiology, occupational health, toxicology, physics, engineering electromagnetics and a representative from the wireless industry. As quoted from EMF Safety Network, the commission was asked to answer eight pointed questions, including:6

Why thousands of peer-reviewed radiofrequency (RF) studies that show a wide range of health effects, including DNA damage, brain and heart tumors, infertility and many other ailments, have been ignored by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC)
Why the FCC guidelines do not account for health effects of wireless technology
Why the FCC RF limits are 100 times higher than those in other countries
Why the FCC is ignoring the World Health Organization classification of wireless as a possible carcinogen
Why, when the world’s leading scientists signed an appeal to protect public health from wireless radiation, nothing has been done
The commission heard from experts and ultimately all except the telecommunication representative acknowledged that RF radiation coming from wireless devices had an effect on humans, animals, insects and plants. The commission wrote:7

“There is mounting evidence that DNA damage can occur from radiation outside of the ionizing part of the spectrum. The Commission heard arguments on both sides of this issue with many now saying there are findings showing biological effects in this range. This argument gets amplified as millimeter waves within the microwave range are beginning to be utilized.”

Their first recommendation was “an independent review of the current RF standards of the electromagnetic radiation in the 300MHz to 300GHz microwave spectrum” to assess the health risks that were linked to cellular communications.8

The remaining recommendations included those that would reduce an individual's exposure to the 5G network and increase the public's knowledge and awareness of their exposure.

Included was a shorter minority report written by the business and industry representative and the telecommunications representative, who were not in agreement with the majority of experts. The EMF Safety Network wrote, “This minority report parrots the language of the telecommunications industry and exposes their agenda to ignore science and continue to confuse the public.”9

Safety Is Taking a Backseat to Speed

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=W2EyQp7GP68

In much the same way the tobacco industry convinced the public that smoking was not dangerous, so is the telecommunications industry selling the public on speed over safety. In the interview above with Greater Earth Media, IT professional Jon Humphrey made the glaringly obvious comparison between the actions of telecommunication, tobacco and leaded gas industries, saying:10

“So, they know the technology is dangerous and that's why they're just trying to get as much of it out there as they can before they're finally held accountable. Sadly, we've seen this all before.

We saw it with big tobacco, we saw it with leaded gas and in every single case the big corporations did what they always do — they lied and then they paid off politicians and they paid scientists and they silenced people and discredited them and sadly they did get away with a lot of it and that's what we need to make sure doesn't happen with 5G.”

The promise is that speeds will be from 10 to 100 times faster than 4G running primarily on millimeter-wave (MMW) bandwidth. According to EMF coach and author Lloyd Burrell, the signals will likely be weaker since the wavelengths do not penetrate buildings and tend to be incorporated into rain and plants. To adjust, the 5G network will use:11

“… smaller cell stations (and the technology of beamforming) that’ll scramble/unscramble and redirect packets of data on a no-interference path back to us. This could mean wireless antennas on every lamp post, utility pole, home and business throughout entire neighborhoods, towns and cities.”

This requires a new infrastructure mounting 5G cell stations on existing structures, such as utility poles. During U.S. Senate hearings on the topic, when asked about the safety studies on these small cell stations, representatives from the industry stated they were not aware if any such studies existed.12

This led Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., to say, “So there really is no research ongoing. We’re kind of flying blind here.” An article published in Scientific American by Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., director for the Center for Family and Community Health in the School of Public Health at the University of California, Berkeley, identified another challenge:13

“5G will not replace 4G; it will accompany 4G for the near future and possibly over the long term. If there are synergistic effects from simultaneous exposures to multiple types of RFR, our overall risk of harm from RFR may increase substantially. Cancer is not the only risk as there is considerable evidence that RFR causes neurological disorders and reproductive harm, likely due to oxidative stress.”

How Is 5G Different From 4G?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=GEx_d0SjvS0

As explained in this video by IEEE Spectrum, part of a large organization devoted to engineering, there are several differences between 4G and 5G technology. Considering there are already many who struggle with electromagnetic hypersensitivity, saturating cities and suburban areas with additional radio frequencies will only add to this once rare affliction.

One of the significant problems with the technology is that it relies primarily on MMW, which is known to penetrate human tissue up to 2 millimeters, where it is absorbed by the surface of the cornea and is conducted by sweat glands within the skin.14 Each of these factors leads to an association with a number of potential health problems.

For example, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) is using MMW in crowd control weapons called the Active Denial System because it produces a severe burning sensation. The DOD writes, "The Active Denial System generates a focused and very directional millimeter-wave radio frequency beam."15

MMW is also known to suppress your immune function16 and increase cellular stress, harmful free radicals, learning deficits17 and, potentially, bacterial antibiotic resistance.18 There is nothing to suggest that 5G will produce less harm than the current technology, and there are thousands of studies demonstrating the harmful effects from that.

Research by Martin Pall, Ph.D., details how excessive oxidative stress triggered by microwave exposure from wireless technology can lead to reproductive harm and neurological disorders, such as anxiety, depression, autism and Alzheimer's.19

Without the Choice to Opt-Out, What Can You Do?
Once it’s installed in your neighborhood, you won’t have a choice to opt out of 5G exposure. “5G will be virtually everywhere, with the options of being able to simply “get away from it” being very limited as millions of small cell devices are rolled out,” Humphrey says.20

There’s no doubt in my mind that microwave radiation from wireless technologies is a significant health hazard that needs to be addressed if you’re concerned about your health. Unfortunately, the rollout of 5G will make remedial action difficult, which is why we all need to get involved and do what we can to prevent it in the first place, such as contacting your local lawmakers and signing local petitions.

Below are several suggestions to help reduce your exposure and mitigate the damage from wireless technology. In addition, you can download a free chapter from my book, “EMF*D,” that summarizes many of the major recommendations. This is handy to keep on your desktop as a reference as you’re making changes in your home.

Identify major sources of EMF in your home, such as your cellphone, cordless phones, Wi-Fi routers, Bluetooth headsets and other Bluetooth-equipped items, wireless mice, keyboards, smart thermostats, baby monitors, smart meters and the microwave in your kitchen. Ideally, address each source and determine how you can best limit their use.

Barring a life-threatening emergency, children should not use a cellphone or a wireless device of any type. Children are far more vulnerable to cellphone radiation than adults due to having thinner skull bones and developing immune systems and brains.

Research also demonstrates that infants under the age of 1 do not effectively learn language from videos, and do not transfer what they learn from the iPad to the real world, so it’s a mistake to think electronic devices provide valuable educational experiences.21

Connect your desktop computer to the internet via a wired Ethernet connection and be sure to put your desktop in airplane mode. Also avoid wireless keyboards, trackballs, mice, game systems, printers and portable house phones. Opt for the wired versions.

If you must use Wi-Fi, shut it off when not in use, especially at night when you are sleeping. Ideally, work toward hardwiring your house so you can eliminate Wi-Fi altogether. If you have a notebook without any Ethernet ports, a USB Ethernet adapter will allow you to connect to the internet with a wired connection.

Avoid using wireless chargers for your cellphone, as they too will increase EMFs throughout your home. Wireless charging is also far less energy efficient than using a dongle attached to a power plug, as it draws continuous power (and emits EMF) whether you’re using it or not.

Shut off the electricity to your bedroom at night. This typically works to reduce electrical fields from the wires in your wall unless there is an adjoining room next to your bedroom. If that is the case, you will need to use a meter to determine if you also need to turn off power in the adjacent room.

Use a battery-powered alarm clock, ideally one without any light. I use a talking clock for the visually impaired.22

If you still use a microwave oven, consider replacing it with a steam convection oven, which will heat your food as quickly and far more safely.

Avoid using “smart” appliances and thermostats that depend on wireless signaling. This includes all new “smart” TVs as they emit a Wi-Fi signal and, unlike your computer, you cannot shut the Wi-Fi signal off. Consider using a large computer monitor as your TV instead, as they don’t emit Wi-Fi.

Refuse a smart meter on your home as long as you can, or add a shield to an existing smart meter, some of which have been shown to reduce radiation as much as 98%.23

Consider moving your baby’s bed into your room instead of using a wireless baby monitor. Alternatively, use a hard-wired monitor.

Replace CFL bulbs with incandescent bulbs. Ideally remove all fluorescent lights from your house. Not only do they emit unhealthy light, but more importantly, they transfer current to your body just being close to the bulbs.

Avoid carrying your cellphone on your body unless in airplane mode and never sleep with it in your bedroom unless it is in airplane mode. Even in airplane mode it can emit signals, which is why I put my phone in a Faraday bag.24

When using your cellphone, use the speaker phone and hold the phone at least 3 feet away from you. Seek to radically decrease your time on the cellphone. Instead, use VoIP software phones that you can use while connected to the internet via a wired connection.

Avoid using your cellphone and other electronic devices at least an hour (preferably several hours) before bed, as the blue light from the screen and EMFs both inhibit melatonin production.25,26 If you must use your phone make sure you have the blue light filters activated and have it in dark mode.

The effects of EMFs are reduced by calcium-channel blockers, so make sure you’re getting enough magnesium. Most people are deficient in magnesium, which will worsen the impact of EMFs.

Pall has published a paper suggesting that raising your level of Nrf2 may help ameliorate EMF damage.27 One simple way to activate Nrf2 is to consume Nrf2-boosting foods, such as cruciferous vegetables and fermented foods and beverages.28

Exercise, calorie restriction (such as intermittent fasting) and activating the nitric oxide signaling pathway (one way of doing that is the Nitric Oxide Dump exercise) will also raise Nrf2."

+ Sources and References
1 Youtube, Full Measure, September 15, 2019, minute 3:25
2 Wireless Infrastructure Association, Jonathan S. Adelstein
3 YouTube, Everything You Need to Know About 5G
4, 7, 8 State of New Hampshire, November 1, 2020
5, 6, 9 EMF Safety Network, Landmark 5g Study by New Hampshire Legislative Commission Recommends Reducing Wireless Exposure
10 YouTube, Greater Earth, July 4, 2019
11 Electric Sense, January 15, 2020
12 YouTube, February 16, 2019
13 Scientific American, October 17, 2019
14 Grassroots Environmental Education, 5th Generation (5G) Wireless Communication Fact Sheet
15 Joint Intermediate Force Capabilities Office, Active Denial System FAQs
16 Biofizika. 2002 Jan-Feb;47(1):71-7
17 Environmental Health Trust, September 13, 2017
18 Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology June 2016; 100(11): 4761-4771
19 Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 2016 Sep;75(Pt B):43-51
20 Northwest Citizen, October 20, 2018
21 AAP.org, Growing Up Digital October 1, 2015
22 Amazon.com Talking Clock
23 IRDA.org March 22, 2020
24 Amazon.com Mission Darkness Faraday Bag for Phones
25 Journal of Advanced Research March 2013; 4(2): 181-187
26 Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Feb; 12(2): 2071–2087
27 Sheng Li Zue Bao 2015 Feb 25;67(1):1-18
28 PLOS|One, 2016, 11(2)

[onawah]

Archive of 4,000 Documents Reveals Government Knew Decades Ago About Health Impact of Wireless Technology
12/21/20
By Dafna Tachover, Esq
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...-human-health/

"Researcher Zorach Glaser, Ph.D. spent decades archiving studies that examine the link between certain health issues and exposure to microwave and radio frequencies. Scholars and the public are now invited to help review Glaser’s documents.

Zorach (Zory) Glaser Ph.D., LT, MSC, USNR, is one of the most important scientists to study the impact of wireless technology on human health. His career as a government research scientist spans decades working for the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Public Health Service, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Bureau of Radiological Health.

Glaser’s extensive archive of nearly 4,000 documents, now available to the public, provides clear evidence that the harmful effects of wireless were known long before cell phones and wireless technology were commercialized in the early 1980s.

The archive materials reveal that the U.S. government, particularly the military, knew for decades of the harm wireless technology can cause to human health. During World War II, the U.S. military started to use radar, and the use of radio telecommunications systems was growing.

Soldiers working with these systems, which use radio and microwave frequencies — the same frequencies used for wireless devices such as cell phones and Wi-Fi — began to complain of adverse health effects from exposure to the radiation emitted by these systems.

At the time, the illness experienced by these soldiers was referred to as “Radiation Sickness /Microwave Sickness.”

Glaser was assigned by the U.S. Navy’s Naval Medical Research Center to investigate. He spent about a decade collecting every study conducted within and outside the U.S. showing that the radiation emitted from radio frequencies (RFs) and microwave frequencies may cause adverse health effects.

Dr. Glaser’s report, “Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation,” was published in 1971. The report references more than 2,300 studies showing multiple adverse biological responses to radio- and microwave-frequency radiation.

Pages 5-12 of the report’s bibliography list these adverse effects, including damage to vital organs and other tissues and the central nervous system, physiological and psychological effects, blood and vascular disorders, metabolic and gastrointestinal disorders, and endocrine and histological changes.

Glaser’s 1976 updated report includes 3,700 studies which confirm the soldiers’ complaints.

At that time, it was mostly only military personnel who were exposed to high levels of microwaves and RF radiation and who developed Microwave/Radiation Sickness.

But today, the whole population is exposed to levels of radiation which are millions and sometimes billions of times higher than they were when Glaser started his work a few decades ago.



The “Microwave Sickness” symptoms suffered then by the military personnel are now widely seen among growing numbers of people in the general population who are exposed to this electro-smog pollution from wireless devices. The sickness, also referred to as electro-sensitivity, is estimated to affect 10% of the general population.

Glasers’ studies and reports are of the utmost importance and relevance to existing harms from current wireless technology, including 5G, cell towers, Wi-Fi and cell phones which use the same type of frequencies and intensities as those studied by Glaser. For this reason Glaser’s reports have been crucial in supporting advocacy efforts and letting the public know that despite what the government and telecom say, there is more than ample evidence of harm from these exposures.A few years ago, when Glaser realized the importance of his archives, he donated them to Dr. Magda Havas, Ph.D. of Trent University in Canada. Havas, an associate professor of environmental and resource studies, has worked for more than a decade to expose the harms of wireless technology.

According to Havas, Glaser’s archive contains quite a few “gems.” “Zory was a packrat (his words) and he kept everything, Havas said. “I found one paper that was circulated to only nine people with health recommendations that were ignored.”

To make these important documents available to the public, Havas and her team have worked for years to scan all the documents and make them searchable. So far Havas’ team has scanned 20 out of the 25 boxes of Glaser’s archives.

Because of the archive’s magnitude, the public is invited to help review the documents. Scholars who are interested are invited to write short overviews of some of the more useful and relevant finds and post those overviews on Zory’s website. People who find important information are asked to let Havas know.

If you are interested in participating in this project, please contact Dr. Magda Havas (drmagdahavas@gmail.com) with a subject heading of “Zory’s Archive.”

[onawah]

[Special Report] The Plague of 5G (and how to survive it)
Lloyd Burrell | ElectricSense via aweber.com
9:34 AM (8 hours ago) 12/25/20
ElectricSense
132, Avenue de Rochefort
Royan Poitou Charentes 17200
FRANCE
From the email update today:

"I want to make sure you have my very special 15-page eGuide on protecting yourself, and your family, from 5G radiation.

In addition to this important eGuide, over the coming days and weeks I will be sharing important information on energetic and frequency healing, navigating electromagnetic fields (EMFs), and also bring you access to many of the world’s leading scientific minds on energy (good and bad).

Please click here for access to the eGuide, exploring some important realities:
5G is the latest “communication highway” coming at us from all directions - and soon it could support at least 100 billion devices - but like all highways (and technology), there is a downside.
What this comprehensive global digital connectivity means is we’re going to have radio-frequency microwave radiation blanketing and permeating our homes, schools, cities, counties and airspace like never before.
Learning to protect yourself (and your loved ones) from EMFs, 5G, Cell Phones (and more) is VITALLY important for your health and your peace of mind.
5G eGuide - Click Here for Free Download https://emffreereport.s3.amazonaws.c...-Burrell-H.pdf
This succinct but powerful eGuide is about understanding the risks and how to avoid them.

To your good life and good health,

Lloyd Burrell
ElectricSense
Live a naturally healthy life in our electromagnetic world!

P.S. Anxious to know more? Click here to discover my solutions oriented book, offering the most profound education on this topic.
https://emffreereport.s3.amazonaws.c...-Burrell-H.pdf
This is a comprehensive summary of the known and suspected effects of electromagnetic fields from everyday devices and appliances like cell phones, computers, wi-fi on humans, animals, and nature, offering a wealth of information, not only on the hazards, but also the practical solutions and insights that will benefit every man, woman, and child on the planet."

P.P.S if the above link doesn't work copy/paste this link into your browser: https://electricsenseinterviews101.c...cal-guide-hto/

ALSO . Click here for FREE access to six EMF expert excerpts :https://www.electricsense.com/6-scie...ks-excerpts-2/

[onawah]

$30 million US study finds “clear evidence of cancer” from cell phone radiation
Lloyd Burrell | ElectricSense lloyd@electric
12/27/20

(This is an ad for a book. I'm not benefiting from posting this in any way other than the satisfaction of sharing valuable information. In any case, the charge for the book is very reasonable, and even without buying the book, there is plenty of great free info on the ElectricSense site. No doubt the book is great too.)


"Did you know that using your cell phone just 30 minutes a day can increase your risk of getting a brain tumor by 40%?

Also, did you know that:
An extensive 10 year $30 million US federal study recently concluded “clear evidence of cancer” from cell phone radiation
Multiple studies link EMFs from cell phones and the like with chronic inflammation suffered by 60% of Americans
24 Hours of EMF exposure from electrical devices commonly found in your home can cause more DNA damage than 1,600 chest X-Rays
5G means the cell phone industry is installing millions of small cell antennas on lamp posts, buildings, and power poles all over the world (+13 million in the US alone) GREATLY increasing radiation levels
I know all this sounds scary, and it is kind of.

But there is something else I want you to know.

A lot of people think that because they can’t feel anything when they use their cell phone and other EMF devices, that they’re okay.

Not true.

“It’s not because you can’t feel Electromagnetic Fields that your cells can’t.”

This is the abundantly clear message from the thousands of independent studies carried out.
I'm not trying to scare you, I just want you to know the hard facts about these dangers and more importantly to share the solutions.

Because, fortunately there are solutions galore, which I’ve laid out in my complete EMF Practical Guide: The Simple Science of Protecting Yourself, Healing Chronic inflammation, and Living a Naturally Health life in Our Toxic Electromagnetic World.

Many other experts in the EMF field have given a lot of time and effort to endorse and support this book. In fact, leading alternative health advocate Dr. Joseph Mercola wrote the foreword.

I truly believe this package is the best investment you can make to protect yourself from 5G and EMFs.

Go to: https://electricsenseinterviews101.c...cal-guide-hto/

(If the above link doesn't work copy/paste it into your browser.)

Lloyd Burrell
ElectricSense
Live a naturally healthy life in our electromagnetic world!

P.S. the link to all the studies cited above can be found here:
https://electricsenseinterviews101.c...scientific-ref
(just scroll to the bottom of the page). "

ElectricSense
132, Avenue de Rochefort
Royan Poitou Charentes 17200
FRANCE

[greybeard]

David Icke | What's Really Happening Globally 5G

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=HmCi68GWiUY

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

5G Tech + A.I. ??

They Control Your Mind Through Your Very Own Virtual Avatar in a Digital Mirror World:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=neOQNpxN0zs

[JenMorri88]

If someone nearby has links to links about the harm of 5g, I would like to read proven research in this area, I'm just looking here, but for a very long time I can't find

[onawah]

THE COMING SURVEILLANCE STATE AKA THE UN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS--PATRICK WOOD
First published at 14:42 UTC on September 7th, 2020.
The Truth About COVID
430 subscribers

[onawah]

Posted by onawah (here)
THE COMING SURVEILLANCE STATE AKA THE UN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS--PATRICK WOOD
First published at 14:42 UTC on September 7th, 2020.
The Truth About COVID
430 subscribers

( Somehow I forgot to post the youtube address, and now I can't find it, but here is another one from Wood:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=4QEgnc5kmdI

[onawah]

5G's impact on nature - flyer available
Email update today from 5G Crisis <report@5gcrisis.com> via gmail.mcsv.net
1/19/21


"How 5G Could Dramatically Alter Our Natural World
Informational Flyer Available Now
While much of our educational and outreach work has focused on wireless radiation and its adverse effects on humans, a sizable body of research is developing which documents the alarming effects radio frequency (RF) radiation can have on the natural world.

This Take Action Tuesday, please share our informational flyer with your state environmental protection agency officials and local environmental committee members about the impacts RF radiation can have on bees and insects.

Access the Flyer HERE: https://8a6b8cd0-359b-4b1b-b042-cdb0...7fbb06949f.pdf

Sample Email to State/Local Stewards of Environmental Protection:

Dear _______,

I am writing to alert you to the growing body of science regarding the disturbing effects 5G wireless radiation frequencies can have on our natural world.

Please see the informational flyer attached, which includes some of the science regarding bees and insects. Many more studies have examined the impacts on birds, trees and other aspects of the environment.

I respectfully urge [insert state department name or local environmental committee name] to investigate this issue further and advocate for communities to stop the deployment of 5G antennas until such time as the environmental effects of this new, powerful technology have been thoroughly examined and fully understood.

Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.

Sincerely, _________
As always, thank you for taking action. Together, we must continue to work diligently to protect public health and the environment from 5G and the greedy telecom industry.

-The 5G Crisis Team"

[ExomatrixTV]

• ⚠️ More 'Big Guns' Question 5G Safety 🦜🦋🌳

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/aWUMewO77gyh

source