+ Reply to Thread
Page 53 of 53 FirstFirst 1 3 43 53
Results 1,041 to 1,049 of 1049

Thread: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

  1. Link to Post #1041
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,552
    Thanked 124,910 times in 20,684 posts

    Question Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!




    I wonder how long it will take to all who live/sleep near that transmitter get (turbo) cancers and other severe health issues? Within a decade? ... 1 year? Couple months?
    • Feel sorry for all children living/sleeping near that mast!
    cheers,
    John 🦜🦋🌳
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 4th February 2024 at 16:28.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  2. Link to Post #1042
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,552
    Thanked 124,910 times in 20,684 posts
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Alecs (17th February 2024)

  4. Link to Post #1043
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,552
    Thanked 124,910 times in 20,684 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Most of the #5G transmitters are directional Military Grade 8x8 Phased Array Beamforming mmWaves & Erratic Pulsed Microwaves like a laser!

    5G Tech can always fall back to other frequencies when needed ... that is why it is not only mmWaves! ... If you do not know the difference between mmWaves and Microwaves, it takes LESS than 1 minute to find out using any search engine!

    #JohnKuhles
    Founder of #Stop5G Fb Group
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Alecs (17th February 2024), Reinhard (21st February 2024), Yoda (24th February 2024)

  6. Link to Post #1044
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,552
    Thanked 124,910 times in 20,684 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    • Dr. Merritt and Celeste Solum on Geoengineering, EMF and the War on Trees:
    Celeste Solum discusses terraforming all biological life via EMF and Geoengineering on Synthetic Biology.

    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v4atumr/?pub=ir01b
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  7. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Alecs (17th February 2024), Reinhard (21st February 2024), Yoda (24th February 2024)

  8. Link to Post #1045
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,552
    Thanked 124,910 times in 20,684 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    • The 5G operators that don't exist!:

    5G radiation is a health worry from the equipment located on masts erected across the country. Researcher, Ian Jarvis joins me to explain that some of the companies operating these potentially dangerous devices do not appear to exist.
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 21st February 2024 at 22:49.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Yoda (24th February 2024)

  10. Link to Post #1046
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,975 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Questions for Congress re 5G/Wireless Concerns
    From: Florida Project
    orlandofloridaproject1@gmail.com

    "For 30 years the FCC has not answered or taken action on the most important RF/EMF health questions, what makes you think they will start now? I have listed questions for Congressman Lalota and the FCC in 2 parts.

    Questions for Congressman Lalota,

    The White House, Congress and the Senate are sitting quietly on the sidelines while the FCC working with politicians and interest groups undermine the scientific method by perpetrating standards that cannot be scientifically connected to the spectrum employed. I am asking how many people shouting out "wireless makes them sick" will it take for Federal and State Governments to begin to take testimonies of people injured by radiation sickness? When will the Federal Government begin, or force the FCC to begin, to do research reviews, spectrum reports, environmental monitoring, risk mitigation and full body (RF) radiation exposure from cell towers, small cells and all wireless access points?
    We are asking to be allowed the Constitutional and human right to have refuge from being poisoned in our own home from employed spectrum that disables me!

    It's not the FCC that will address this problem of full-fledged censorship of all truth narratives that challenge the FCC and they have proven it since at least 1996. I suggest that the problem to overcome to fix this disaster the FCC has helped create, is the harmful exposures that are currently being ignored by this captured agency are created by giant global energy and telecommunications industries. This is a dependency by design plan on "smart" environmental toxins because the spectrum employed is a hazard, it's an energetic form of air pollution. Forced exposure constitutes an abuse of the most basic of human rights. One example is the tens of thousands of people claiming to be made sick from smart meters installed on their property without their informed consent. Silencing those citizens and scientists who are pointing out the problem has not helped to solve it. Rather, the input of these people was/is needed for the massive problem solving that is urgently required so as to reduce RF-EMF-induced health issues grinding down human health.Many more questions than listed below remain regarding the future ability of science to effectively inform policy making, therefore I am asking why there is NOT one U.S. government agency with oversight for wireless radiation health effects to address the questions the FCC ignores? Once the facts are known, the big question is why is the FCC not being shut down or completely restructured?

    We are asking you, Congressman Lalota, to acknowledge FCC interpretations of the law since 1996 have increasingly resulted in a blatant abuse of power and authority. For 3 decades the FCC has sidestepped all democratic processes a level far above even the most informed concerned activist citizens regarding the spectrum employed. The FCC is directly responsible for the increasing harm caused by dismissing evidence showing effects, as well as decreeing there is no conclusive evidence of harm. Will you begin to take action to investigate the FCC? Will you inform the President and our elected officials in Congress to come together to expose and convert this abusive control system the FCC represents?

    Questions for the FCC

    1. When will the FCC take responsibility for clear communication of risk?

    2.When will the FCC educate the public on how to avoid potential harm?

    3.Why is the precautionary principle not being included within FCC policies regarding all wireless technologies, including 5G?4. The 5G narrative leads to several issues and related questions, why has the FCC still not answered them?

    5. Why does the FCC authorize criminal trespassing for wireless installations to pulse into my home that make me sick to the point of disabling me?

    6. Highly experienced scientists and doctors have been speaking out for 30 years, now into the 5G narrative, claiming adequate evidence for risk of harm. They have organized into independent science-based advocacy groups over the decades, why has the FCC not recognized the evidence-based concerns?

    6.Why is the FCC allowed to not change their opinions to downplay the results of scientists who claim that harm exists including testimonies of countless people with symptoms consistent with microwave sickness from FCC authorized installations?

    7. The FCC standards the wireless industry has been using since 1996 to make the claim for forced deployment in 2021 were defeated in a U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. They ruled that the FCC’s decision not to re-assess the adequacy of 1996 exposure guidelines was “arbitrary, capricious, and not evidence-based.” The court found the FCC had failed to provide evidence of properly examining long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, the testimony of people injured by radiation sickness and impacts to the developing brain and reproductive system.”Why is the FCC still not properly examining long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, the testimony of people injured by radiation sickness doing research reviews, spectrum reports, environmental monitoring, risk mitigation and full body (RF) radiation exposure in homes and schools from cell towers, small cells and all wireless access points?

    8. Forcing exposure without informed consent to wireless access points, according to U.S. law, is clearly criminal trespassing, robbery of life and health in the 1st Degree. Why is the FCC allowed to break that law decade after decade forcing countless people to become sick?

    9. The 1996 FCC standards do not account for any impact of differing signal characteristics, such as carrier wave modulations or pulsing of the signal. Small cells are designed for massive increases in data density, where the polarized wave form radically increases. The spectrum employed is in no way scientifically connected to the FCC Safety Standards, why are they still being used?

    10. For decades the FCC has openly admitted it has no expertise in health issues. The FCC often mentions it’s the responsibility of “sister agencies” like the EPA on which it relies in order to give credibility to its 1996 guidelines. 27 years ago the EPA wrote the FCC that the guidelines are “flawed.” How can the FCC justify that?

    11. FCC limits should have been changed long ago to be based on scientific evidence rather than on erroneous assumptions. Why do you refuse to update your standards with scientific evidence? For a complete understanding of how your FCC safety standards cannot be scientifically connected to the spectrum employed including scientific evidence demonstrating how, read this 25 page study I sent to Congressman Lalota titled. "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G"Looking forward to the Congressman's response. I don't expect answers or action from the FCC, until the time comes for them to answer under oath!

    Best,
    Jeff Chiacchieri & Susan Burke"
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    ExomatrixTV (3rd March 2024), Yoda (24th February 2024)

  12. Link to Post #1047
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,975 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    More from the Florida Project
    Jeff Chiacchieri is with Joel Moskowitz and 2 others
    https://www.facebook.com/jeff.chiacc...ment&ref=notif


    "The only reason anyone chooses to live in a grid of the wireless radiation density depicted in that image is simply because they have been denied facts for decades. Since what the majority thinks is based on what they are told from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), manipulation of a nation of minds has been accomplished through control of information provided through the FCC and wireless industry.

    What’s clear today is FCC exposure “guidelines” created with blatant errors allows control of the people’s perception through manipulating facts. Three decades into this shows it’s become a lifetime programming process that built parameters of thought and few have been presented the opportunity to learn how to escape out of 3 decades of managed perceptions flowing from the FCC and wireless industry.

    Rulings and orders of the FCC are not laws, and do not have the force of law. They are interpretations of the law that since 1996 increasingly result in an abuse of power and authority. Forcing exposure without informed consent to wireless access points, according to U.S. law, is clearly criminal trespassing, robbery of life and health in the 1st Degree because it is resulting in serious physical injury as outlined in this post. It is also “terrorism” as defined in 18 UGG chapter 113b, section 2331, sub 2,d: “any weapon that is designed to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life.” Any wireless device that can cause a person to have physical symptoms resulting in illness, DNA damage and can enable thousands of other problems in one's mind and or body is dangerous and should be considered a weapon, including when entering into ones home.

    Increasingly the FCC forces us to be exposed to unknown and unregulated parameters like intensity, density, frequency, increasing exposure duration, polarization, pulsing and modulation. Every cell phone, access point and wireless device added to the grid increases antenna densification.

    The expansion of radiation delivery to populations is planned to become the main force driving global market value up in the years ahead. Based on the still expanding 4G network and the roll out of the 5G network the number of active IoT devices in the US is expected to grow year-over-year until 2030. In 2020 it reached 2 billion, by 2023 there were 3.2 billion, by 2030 if all goes as planned there will be at least 6.5-8 billion active wireless devices in the USA radically increasing radiation delivery to populations over what there is today. To meet all the Sustainable development goals is 1 trillion wireless devices connected globally by 2050. Why the need to radically increase radiation density everywhere through whats called an "underlying network of components” in the years ahead?

    The digital public infrastructure (DPI) will require radical increases in RF exposures through the use of connected smart devices used for surveillance and control that combines digital ID, central bank digital currencies [CBDC], vaccine passports, carbon footprint tracking data, 15-minute smart cities, future lockdowns and systems of social credit expanding the Digital Public Infrastructure. The plan is to consolidate banking, education, healthcare, voting, government, payroll, and benefits distributed through smart phones. All of that is part of a broader plan toward never ending Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Small cells are key to Sustainable Development Goals and ever-increasing radiation delivery to populations dependent on smart phones, devices and access points to exist within the system of connected wireless devices, access points and sensors.

    The revolving door between government and the telecommunications industry make rapid deployment possible through the NCTA and CITA increasingly year after year lobbying more and more congressional bills using billions of dollars of moneypower invested lobbying, which ramped up to almost 1 billion alone between 2012-2014 to get them to the 2020 deployment goals and beyond.

    The man who led industry lobbying and a major cover-up of wireless toxicity is Tom Wheeler who not only supervised an industry funded 25 million research study on the harmful effects of wireless, he handpicked the research leader, who officially concluded all wireless is harmless. After this activity as head of the NCTA, Tom Wheeler was nominated FCC chairman by Barack Obama when he was President. The former FCC chairmen Michael Powell became head the NCTA. The former FCC commissioner Jonathan Adelstein became head of the Wireless Infrastructure Association. And Meredith Baker, another former FCC commissioner became head of the CTIA.

    Lets make a list of what the American people deserve to understand about the FCC, want to join in making a list of what the people do not know? I will start!
    -The FCC is using standards that cannot be scientifically connected to the spectrum employed.
    - For decades the FCC has been presented with evidence that remains unexamined and unacknowledged.
    - All wireless communications devices communicate via modulating pulsations, smart devices and smart phones pulse much more than non smart ones. That makes them more toxic and the FCC ignores the proven toxicity of pulsation.
    - Since 1996 we the people have not been permitted to properly challenge the FCC in regards to how they had failed to undertake a proper assessment of radiation delivery to the population. Or to question the FCC's approach to regulation to challenge its guidelines.
    - The FCC is increasingly and aggressively restricting local governments control over restricting reaiation delivery into peoples homes while at the same time, supporting and promoting the deployment of 5G and other next-generation wireless services through a "smart" infrastructure policy.
    - The FCC is pushing the smart infrastructure, using small cells, designed for massive increases in data density represented in the image. In this "smart infrastructure" the polarized wave form increases with that increase in density. The bioactive effects increasingly become more prominent as our bodies increasingly react to the spectrum and that is not covered in the FCC Safety Standards.
    -There is a proven error in the design in the FCC guidelines being used; the omission of the fact about how every human cellular process is controlled by electrical fields. The “error” in the standards used has been identified repeatedly in the public domain for decades showing hard evidence of severe adverse effects from wireless radiation. This error is clearly how misinformation is supplied and used by the FCC, telecommunications industry, its lobbyists, its government partners, its political enablers, the mainstream media and employed academic enablers.
    - In 2021, the FCC lost a federal lawsuit concerning its reliance on 1996 guidelines. The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. ruled that the FCC’s decision not to re-assess the adequacy of 1996 exposure guidelines was “arbitrary, capricious, and not evidence-based.”

    The court reviewed over 11,000 pages of evidence in the landmark case. “The court found the FCC had failed to provide evidence of properly examining long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, the testimony of people injured by radiation sickness and impacts to the developing brain and reproductive system.”

    Court decision decided August 13, 2021 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/.../chd-v-fcc-we-won...
    The adverse effects of wireless radiation forced onto the American people are massive in scope and magnitude and act as both a promoter, accelerator and initiator of adverse health effects.

    The plan for more wireless radiation infrastructure the FCC is deploying will clearly exacerbate further the adverse effects from wireless radiation on human health. Additionally wireless radiation plays a dual role of initiator and promoter/accelerator of serious disease. In its promoter/accelerator role, through synergy, it can accelerate the progression of existing serious diseases and multiple other serious adverse health effects. Adding a wireless radiation promoter/accelerator to our residential environment will radically increase our family's chances for developing serious diseases. Additionally that forced radiation delivery degrades the operation of the innate and adaptive immune system, it would increase the likelihood that our immune systems could not counteract the exposure to the ongoing coronavirus (or any virus) as nature intended. It would clearly contribute to the exacerbation of adverse effects from coronavirus exposure.

    Government tells us to wear a mask and get a vaccine, but don't ever let go of that smart phone!

    Long ago the onus of proof should have been forced onto to the FCC and industry to acknowledge decades of proof and hundreds of thousands of people reporting symptoms consistent with microwave sickness since before 1996. The"error" embedded within their standards year over year results in significant omissions of critical studies and testimonials. That and everything else pointed out in this post clearly makes the FCC's conclusions and the FCC itself totally unreliable and unqualified for building the 1996 standards or spearheading the creation of new ones. The standards they still force on the American people today were never a suitable basis on which to build public policy and safety standards for todays and tomorrow's wireless spectrum.

    Out of 100 Senators, 435 Representatives, One President, 50 Governors, 50 Attorney Generals, 9 Supreme Court Justices, 1000 Judges, 1000 Law Professors, who will come forward and inform the American people of these facts?"
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    ExomatrixTV (3rd March 2024), Yoda (24th February 2024)

  14. Link to Post #1048
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,552
    Thanked 124,910 times in 20,684 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    • Cell Tower Health Effects Safety Issues Presentation:

    • Science on Health Risks of Cell Towers, 5G Exposure, Small Cell Densification and New Wireless Networks


    Health Risks Associated With 5G Exposure, Small Cell Densification, and New Wireless Networks

    European Parliament requested a research report “Health Impact of 5G” which was released in July 2021 and concluded that commonly used RFR frequencies (450 to 6000 MHz) are probably carcinogenic for humans and affect male fertility with possible adverse effects on the development of embryos, fetuses and newborns.

    A review entitled “Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans living around mobile phone base stations: From radiofrequency sickness to cancer reviewed the existing scientific literature and found radiofrequency sickness, cancer and changes in biochemical parameters (Balmori 2022).
    In this paper, we show how the past 25 years of extensive research on RFR demonstrates that the assumptions underlying the FCC’s and ICNIRP’s exposure limits are invalid and continue to present a public health harm. Adverse effects observed at exposures below the assumed threshold SAR include non-thermal induction of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, sperm damage, and neurological effects, including electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Also, multiple human studies have found statistically significant associations between RFR exposure and increased brain and thyroid cancer risk. Yet, in 2020, and in light of the body of evidence reviewed in this article, the FCC and ICNIRP reaffirmed the same limits that were established in the 1990s. Consequently, these exposure limits, which are based on false suppositions, do not adequately protect workers, children, hypersensitive individuals, and the general population from short-term or long-term RFR exposures. Thus, urgently needed are health protective exposure limits for humans and the environment. These limits must be based on scientific evidence rather than on erroneous assumptions, especially given the increasing worldwide exposures of people and the environment to RFR, including novel forms of radiation from 5G telecommunications for which there are no adequate health effects studies.
    • Impacts to Wildlife and the Natural Environment
    A landmark research review by U.S experts of over 1,200 studies on the effects of non ionizing radiation to wildlife entitled “Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna” published in Reviews on Environmental Health found adverse effects at even very low intensities including impacts to orientation and migration, reproduction, mating, nest, den building and survivorship. (Levitt et al., 2021a, Levitt et al., 2021b, Levitt et al., 2021c).

    A review of the ecological effects of RF-EMF” published in Environment International reviewed found RF had a significant effect on birds, insects, other vertebrates, other organisms, and plants in 70% of the studies reviewed with development and reproduction in birds and insects the most strongly affected. (Cucurachi 2013).

    The research review “Electromagnetic radiation as an emerging driver factor for the decline of insects” published in Science of the Total Environment found “sufficient evidence” of effects including impacts to flight, foraging and feeding, short-term memory and mortality. (Balmori 2021)

    Electromagnetic (EMF) frequencies have been found to alter the growth and development of plants. Studies on wireless EMF frequencies have found physiological and morphological changes, increased micronuclei formation, altered growth as well as adverse cell characteristics such as thinner cell walls and smaller mitochondria. Plants perceive and respond to electromagnetic fields.

    A field study that monitored over 100 trees for 9 years entitled ​​Radiofrequency radiation injures trees around mobile phone base stations published in Science of the Total Environment found a high level of damage to trees in the vicinity of phone masts (Waldmann-Selsam 2016). The authors conclude that “deployment has been continued without consideration of environmental impact.”
    • 5G and Higher Frequencies are Highly Absorbed into Insects- Especially Bees
    Exposure of Insects to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from 2 to 120 GHz” published in Scientific Reports is the first study to investigate how insects (including the Western honeybee) absorb the higher frequencies (2 GHz to 120 GHz) to be used in the 4G/5G rollout. The scientific simulations showed increases in absorbed power between 3% to 370% when the insects were exposed to the frequencies. Researchers concluded, “This could lead to changes in insect behaviour, physiology, and morphology over time….” (Thielens 2018).
    • Cell towers, 5G Networks, and 4G Small Cells Emit Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation
    Studies find RF exposure elevated in buildings located close to cell antennas.

    Baltrėnas et al 2012 investigated RF power density levels from cell phone antennas located 35 meters away from a 10-story apartment building. The transmitting antennas were approximately at the same height as the 6th floor of the building. The researchers found the highest RF on floors 5–7. The RF at the 6th-floor balcony was three times higher than the 3rd-floor balcony. The RF power density on the 6th floor was about 15 times the RF measures on the first floor.

    The study “Radiofrequency radiation from nearby mobile phone base stations-a case comparison of one low and one high exposure apartment “ published in Oncology Letters (Koppel et al 2019) found that the apartment with high RF exposure had outdoor areas as close as 6 meters (about 19.6 feet) from the cell antenna array. In contrast, the low-exposure apartment’s balcony had cell antennas at 40 meters (about 131 feet) away. The researchers also found that both apartments had good mobile phone reception and “Therefore, installation of base stations to risky places cannot be justified using the good reception requirement argument.”

    A 2017 case report of RF levels in an apartment close to two groups of rooftop cellular antennas used an exposimeter to measure levels of different types of RF in the apartment and balconies including TV, FM, TETRA emergency services, 2G GSM, 3G UMTS, 4G LTE, DECT cordless, Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz and WiMAX. The closest transmitting antennas were at a base station 6 meters from the balcony. The researchers documented several important findings. First, 97.9% of the mean RF radiation was caused by downlink from the 2G, 3G, and 4G base stations. (Downlink means frequencies emitted “down” from the base station cellular antennas.) The researchers found that if the base station RF emissions were excluded, the RF radiation in the children’s bedrooms was reduced ~99%. The researchers conclude that “due to the current high RF radiation, the apartment is not suitable for long‑term living, particularly for children who may be more sensitive than adults.”
    • Outdoor levels of RF are increasing from the densification of wireless networks
    A study measuring RF-EMF exposure in the European cities of Basel, Ghent, and Brussels found total RF exposure levels in all investigated outdoor locations had increased up to 57.1% in one year (April 2011 to March 2012). The RF increase was most notably observed in outdoor locations due to mobile phone base stations. Urbinello et al., 2014

    A 2018 study published in Oncology Letters documented measurements of “unnecessarily high” radiofrequency (RF) radiation levels in several locations in Stockholm, Sweden. The authors conclude “Using high-power levels causes an excess health risk to many people. Even higher RF radiation is expected when 5G is implemented.”

    A 2018 study by Hardell et al published in the World Academy of Sciences Journal found the RF levels at Järntorget square in Stockholm Old Town Sweden (measured in April 2016) were only one order of magnitude lower than the RF levels associated with an increased incidence of tumors in the Ramazzini radiofrequency animal study (Falcioni et al 2018) which exposed rats to a lifetime of RF mimicking cell tower base station exposures. The authors concluded, “These results indicate that increased cancer risk may be the situation for individuals staying at the square, primarily for those working in shops and cafés around the square. We have not measured RF radiation emissions in apartments around the square. It cannot be excluded that at certain places, the radiation may even be higher…”

    A 2017 study of the Royal Castle, Supreme Court, three major squares, and the Swedish Parliament found despite the hidden architecturally camouflaged antennas, the passive exposure to RF radiation from cell antennas can be higher than RF levels associated with non-thermal biological effects. Some of the highest levels were from antennas closer to the ground and targeted toward the square. The researchers note that the heaviest RF load falls on people working or living near hotspots, compared to people that are walking by and briefly exposed. RF measurements from earlier published studies were compared to the 2017 measurements indicating that “it is clear from our present and previous studies that the level of ambient RF radiation exposure is increasing.”

    A 2016 study at Stockholm Central Railway Station in Sweden documented higher RF levels in areas where base station antennas were located closest to people. Importantly, the RF from the downlink of UMTS, LTE, and GSM base station antennas contributed to most of the radiation levels.

    A 2022 study “Very high radiofrequency radiation at Skeppsbron in Stockholm, Sweden from mobile phone base station antennas positioned close to pedestrians’ heads” created an RF heat map of RF measurements finding that the highest RF measurements were in areas of proximity to the base station antennas. The researchers concluded with recommendations to reduce proximity placements such as positioning antennas “as far as possible from the general public” like in high-elevation locations or remote areas.

    A 2022 study in the World Academy of Sciences Journal measured levels of radiofrequency radiation (RFR), from wireless networks including 5G, in the city of Columbia, South Carolina, and found the highest RFR levels in areas where the cell phone base station antennas were placed on top of utility poles, street lamps, traffic lights or other posts near to the street. When the scientists compared their 2022 findings to a 2019 published review on the mean outdoor exposure level of European cities, they found the Columbia, South Carolina measurements to be the highest. The Columbia, S.C. study concluded that the highest exposure areas were due to two reasons: cell phone base antennas on top of high-rise buildings provide “good cell coverage reaching far away, but creating elevated # exposure to the radiofrequency electromagnetic fields at the immediate vicinity, and cell phone base station antennas installed on top of utility poles have placed the radiation source closer to humans walking on street level.”

    Image from Koppel T and Koppel T: Measurements of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, including 5G, in the city of Columbia, SC, USA. World Acad Sci J 4: 22, 2022

    Published Reviews That Recommend Cell Towers Be Distanced Away From Homes and Schools
    • A review paper entitled “Limiting liability with positioning to minimize negative health effects of cellular phone towers” reviewed the “large and growing body of evidence that human exposure to RFR from cellular phone base stations causes negative health effects.” The authors recommend restricting antennas near homes and within 500 meters of schools and hospitals to protect companies from future liability (Pearce 2020).
    • An analysis of 100 studies published in Environmental Reviews found ~80% showed biological effects near towers. “As a general guideline, cell base stations should not be located less than 1500 ft from the population, and at a height of about 150 ft.” (Levitt 2010)
    • A review published in the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health found people living less than 500 m from base station antennas had increased adverse neuro-behavioral symptoms and cancer in eight of the ten epidemiological studies (Khurana 2011).
    • A paper by human rights experts documented the accumulating science indicating safety is not assured and considered the issue within a human rights framework to protect vulnerable populations from environmental pollution. “We conclude that, because scientific knowledge is incomplete, a precautionary approach is better suited to State obligations under international human rights law.” (Roda and Perry 2014)
    • A review entitled “Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans living around mobile phone base stations: From radiofrequency sickness to cancer reviewed the existing scientific literature and found radiofrequency sickness, cancer, and changes in biochemical parameters. (Balmori 2022)
    Cell Towers Radiofrequency Radiation and Cancer: World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer

    In 2011, radiofrequency radiation was classified as a Class 2B possible carcinogen by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO/IARC). The WHO/IARC scientists clarified that this determination was for RFR from any source be it cell phones, wireless devices, or cell towers. Since 2011, the published peer-reviewed scientific evidence associating RFR with cancer and other adverse effects has significantly increased.

    In 2019, the WHO/IARC advisory committee recommended that radiofrequency radiation be re-evaluated as a “high” priority in light of the new research. The date of the re-evaluation has not been set.

    Currently, several scientists conclude that the weight of current peer-reviewed evidence supports the conclusion that radiofrequency radiation is a proven human carcinogen (Hardell and Carlberg 2017, Peleg et al, 2018, Miller et al 2018).
    • Research Studies to Know
    Two published case reports have documented illness after installation of 5G antennas “Case Report: The Microwave Syndrome after Installation of 5G Emphasizes the Need for Protection from Radiofrequency Radiation and Development of the Microwave Syndrome in Two Men Shortly after Installation of 5G on the Roof above their Office.
    • European Parliament requested a research report “Health Impact of 5G” which was released in July 2021 and concluded that commonly used RFR frequencies (450 to 6000 MHz) are probably carcinogenic for humans and affect male fertility with possible adverse effects on the development of embryos, fetuses and newborns.
    • A large-scale animal study published in Environmental Research found rats exposed to cell tower emission RF levels had elevated cancers, the very same cancers also found in the US National Toxicology Program animal study of cell phone RF. Falcioni 2018
    • A study published in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine found changes in blood considered biomarkers predictive of cancer in people living closer to cell antenna arrays (Zothansiama 2017).
    • A study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health found higher exposure to cell arrays linked to higher mortality from all cancer and specifically lung and breast cancer (Rodrigues 2021).
    • A 10-year study published in Science of the Total Environment on cell phone antennas by the local Municipal Health Department and several universities in Brazil found a elevated relative risk of cancer mortality at residential distances of 500 meters or less from cell phone towers (Dode 2011).
    • A study commissioned by the Government of Styria, Austria found a significant cancer incidence in the area around the transmitter as well as significant exposure-effect relationships between radiofrequency radiation exposure and the incidence of breast cancers and brain tumors (Oberfeld 2008).
    • A review published in Experimental Oncology found “alarming epidemiological and experimental data on possible carcinogenic effects of long-term exposure to low-intensity microwave (MW) radiation.” Even a year of operation of a powerful base transmitting station for mobile communication reportedly resulted in a dramatic increase in cancer incidence among the population living nearby (Yakymenko 2011).
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    “In recent years, concern has increased about exposure to radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic radiation emitted from cell phones and phone station antennas. An Egyptian study confirmed concerns that living nearby mobile phone base stations increased the risk for developing:
    • Headaches
    • Memory problems
    • Dizziness
    • Depression
    • Sleep problems
    Short-term exposure to these fields in experimental studies have not always shown negative effects, but this does not rule out cumulative damage from these fields, so larger studies over longer periods are needed to help understand who is at risk. In large studies, an association has been observed between symptoms and exposure to these fields in the everyday environment.”
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    Surveys of people living near cell tower antennas in France, Spain, Iraq, India, Germany, Egypt, Poland have found significantly higher reports of health issues including sleep issues, fatigue and headaches (See Santini et al. 2003, López 2021, Alazawi 2011, Pachuau and Pachuaua 2016, Eger et al. 2004, Abdel-Rassoul et al. 2007, Bortkiewicz et al., 2004).

    A study published in American Journal of Men’s Health linked higher cell tower RFR exposures to delayed fine and gross motor skills and to deficits in spatial working memory and attention in school adolescents (Meo 2018).

    A study published in Environmental Research and Public Health found higher exposures linked to higher risk of type 2 diabetes (Meo 2015).

    A study following people for 6 years linked increased cell phone and cell phone tower antenna exposure to altered levels of hormones including cortisol, thyroid, prolactin and testosterone (Eskander et al. 2021).

    A study that followed people in a German town after a cell tower was erected found stress hormones adrenaline and noradrenaline significantly increased over the first 6 months after the antenna activation and decreased dopamine and PEA levels after 18 months (Buchner 2011).
    • 4G is not so safe either.
    Studies on 4G exposure to rodents found behavioral changes (Broom et al. 2019), damage to the testes (Yu et al. 2019), reduced sperm (Oh et al. 2018), damage to the optic nerve (Ozdemir et al. 2021) and impacts to neuronal activity (Souffi et al. 2022).
    Studies on human volunteers have found 4G impacts on brain waves (Vecsei et al. 2018, Yang et al. 2017, Lv et al. 2014, Wei et al. 2018). A study on human cells found continuous exposure decreased human cell proliferation and increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in human cells (Choi et al. 2020).

    Over 30 state legislatures have enacted industry friendly small cell legislation that facilitates deployment of 5G small cells into neighborhoods and in front of schools. These laws generally streamline the application process, cap costs and fees for the companies and tighten timelines for the consideration and processing of cell siting applications.

    Research on 5G and Novel Frequencies Indicating Safety Is Not Assured
    • Higher Frequency 5G
    5G systems are using low band frequencies well associated with harmful effects (ICBE-EMF 2022, European Parliament 2021, Panagopoulos et al. 2021). However 5G networks are also using higher frequencies such as 3.5 GHz and into the mmWave range starting at 24 GHz.
    • Scientists state that long term exposure can not be assumed as safe.
    Contrary to claims that the 5G’s higher frequencies simply “bounce” off the skin, researchers have documented that the coiled portion of the skin’s sweat duct can be regarded as a helical antenna in the sub-THz band and the skin, our largest organ, can intensely absorb the higher 5G frequencies (Feldman and Ben Ishai 2017). Ultra-high frequency above 20 GHz could overheat tissue (Matthew and Kazaure 2022).

    Reviews of 5G health effects caution that the expected real-world impact would be far more serious due to the complex waveforms and other combinations with other toxic stimuli in the environment (Kostoff et al 2020, Russell, 2018, Belyaev 2019, McCredden et al 2023).

    Researchers will often experiment with zebrafish, rodents and fruit flies to gain data on potential health effects to humans. An Oregon State University study on zebrafish exposed to 3.5 GHz (Dasgupta et al. 2022) found “significant abnormal responses in RFR-exposed fish” which “suggest potential long-term behavioral effects. Yang et al 2022 found 3.5 GHZ induced oxidative stress in guinea pigs.

    A study on 3.5 GHz exposure to both diabetic and healthy rats (Bektas et al 2022) found an increase in degenerated neurons in the hippocampus of the brains, changes in oxidative stress parameters and changes in the energy metabolism and appetite of both healthy and diabetic rats. The researchers conclude that, “5G may not be innocent in terms of its biological effects, especially in the presence of diabetes.”

    Studies on rats have found exposure to both 1.5 and 4.3 GHz microwaves induced: cognitive impairment and hippocampal tissue damage (Zhu et al 2921); impairments in spatial learning and memory, with the combined simultaneous exposures resulting in the most most severe effects (Wang et al 2022); and immune suppressive responses (Zhao 2022). Long-term exposure to 2.856 and 9.375 GHz microwaves impaired learning and memory abilities as well as EEG disturbance, structural damage to the hippocampus, and differential expression of hippocampal tissue and serum exosomes (Wang et al. 2023).

    Studies on fruit flies exposed to 3.5 GHz have found the exposure led to increases in oxidative stress, changes in the microbial community (Wang et al 2022) and alterations of the expression of several types of genes (Wang et al 2021).

    A review by Russell 2018 found evidence for millimeter wave effects to the skin, eyes, immune system, gene expression, and bacterial antibiotic resistance. While recent experimental research on high-band 5G impacts to animal fertility found that 27 GHz damages sperm quality in mussels (Pecoraro et al 2023), the US is not funding any research on biological effects of frequencies at 3.5 GHz or above 6GHz to humans.
    2022, Pecoraro et al. Biological Effects of Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Fields at 27 GHz on Sperm Quality of Mytilus galloprovincialis. J Mar Sci Eng 10 (4): 521J Mar Sci Eng 10 (4): 521

    2022, Wang et al. 3.5-GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation promotes the development of Drosophila melanogaster Environ Pollut 294: 118646
    2021, Wang et al. Simulated mobile communication frequencies (3.5 GHz) emitted by a signal generator affects the sleep of Drosophila melanogaster Environ Pollut 283: 117087
    2020, Kim et al. Effects of Electromagnetic Waves with LTE and 5G Bandwidth on the Skin Pigmentation In Vitro Int J Mol Sci 22 (1): E170
    Dasgupta, S., Leong, C., Simonich, M. T., Truong, L., Liu, H., & Tanguay, R. L. (2022). Transcriptomic and Long-Term Behavioral Deficits Associated with Developmental 3.5 GHz Radiofrequency Radiation Exposures in Zebrafish. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 9(4), 327–332.
    Yang, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, X., Gan, P., Luo, X., Zhong, S., & Zuo, W. (2022). Effects of Acute Exposure to 3500 MHz (5G) Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation on Anxiety-Like Behavior and the Auditory Cortex in Guinea Pigs. Bioelectromagnetics, 43(2), 106–118.
    Betzalel, N., Feldman, Y., & Ishai, P. B. (2017). The Modeling of the Absorbance of Sub-THz Radiation by Human Skin. IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 7(5), 521–528.
    Nasim, I., & Kim, S. (2019). Adverse Impacts of 5G Downlinks on Human Body. 2019 SoutheastCon, 1–6.
    Di Ciaula, A. (2018). Towards 5G communication systems: Are there health implications?
    International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 221(3), 367–375.
    Frank, J. W. (2021). Electromagnetic fields, 5G and health: What about the precautionary principle? J Epidemiol Community Health, 75(6), 562–566.
    Hardell, L., & Carlberg, M. (2020). [Comment] Health risks from radiofrequency radiation, including 5G, should be assessed by experts with no conflicts of interest. Oncology Letters, 20(4), 1–1.
    Hinrikus, H., Koppel, T., Lass, J., Orru, H., Roosipuu, P., & Bachmann, M. (2022). Possible health effects on the human brain by various generations of mobile telecommunication: A review based estimation of 5G impact. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 98(7), 1210–1221.
    Kostoff, R. N., Heroux, P., Aschner, M., & Tsatsakis, A. (2020). Adverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions. Toxicology Letters, 323, 35–40.
    Weller S, May M, McCredden J, Leach V, Phung D, Belyaev I. Comment on “5G mobile networks and health-a state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz” by Karipidis et al. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 24.
    Raveendran, R.; Tabet Aoul, K.A. A Meta-Integrative Qualitative Study on the Hidden Threats of Smart Buildings/Cities and Their Associated Impacts on Humans and the Environment. Buildings 2021, 11, 251. Russell, C. L. (2018). 5 G wireless telecommunications expansion: Public health and environmental implications. Environmental Research, 165, 484–495.
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 3rd March 2024 at 18:37.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    onawah (4th March 2024), Yoda (3rd March 2024)

  16. Link to Post #1049
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,975 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Another great compilation from Dr. Ana Mihalcea on the dangers of 5G/self-replicating nanobots in the clot shots, etc.
    Too much to copy and paste right now, but it's all here:
    https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/cp/142191785
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

+ Reply to Thread
Page 53 of 53 FirstFirst 1 3 43 53

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts