+ Reply to Thread
Page 44 of 53 FirstFirst 1 34 44 53 LastLast
Results 861 to 880 of 1049

Thread: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

  1. Link to Post #861
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,728
    Thanks
    30,823
    Thanked 125,714 times in 20,824 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    • EMF (5G, WiFi...) Human Rights Scandal in Switzerland / Schweiz and Worldwide - by Réza Ganjavi, MBA:

    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 26th August 2021 at 22:01.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    onawah (19th August 2021), Reinhard (2nd November 2021)

  3. Link to Post #862
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,728
    Thanks
    30,823
    Thanked 125,714 times in 20,824 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!



    ¤=[Post Update]=¤


    The name Hendricus G. Loos does not belong to a person, its a fictitious name. Perhaps the person working behind this name is Professor Ross Adey , who qualified in Medicine from Australia, then came to Oxford University to study brain physiology . Then he joined University of California in 1954, later joined the Brain Research Institute in 1961. He mainly studied the effects of ELF & microwaves on human brain and nervous system. He developed several devices for remote mind control and manipulation of nervous system which were later patented in US. There could be a few other such professionals and scientists, who developed the Mind Control devices under a single fictitious name 'Dr Hendricus G. Loos', actually working for DARPA or CIA, so as not to attract the attention of the Media or investigators.


    As per available records Dr Hendricus G. Loos( fictitious ) was associated with Plasmadyne Corporation during the late fifties. He published an article about Yang-Mills field in 1969 in American Physical Society Journal. He had set up a shop in Fallbrook, California and developed Lagoona Research Laboratory. Then he worked with the department of Defence , US; department of Health & Human Services and Defence Advance Research Projects Agency ( DARPA) where he spent most of his time. In 2003 , he became the President of Cuewave Corporation. Dr Loos filed for business licence ( entity no-C2396570). Company's own site cuewave.com is nothing more than a copy of site for advertising business. Any search for business yields nothing more than directory listings. The listings themselves provide little additional data other than the business is listed for commercial physical research and has a standard industrial classification (SIC) with code of 8731(10) This classifies them for commercial, physical and biological research. He is also referred to as Dr Henry Loos or Dr Hank Loos. Since 1978 , he has been awarded 11 patents by US for devices mainly aiming for human nervous system manipulation. Some examples are:
    • USP# 3009080- Apparatus and method for generating and containing plasma having ultra high temperatures.
    • USP# 4245909- An optical instrument for measurement of particle size distribution.
    • USP# 6238333- Remote magnetic manipulation of nervous systems.
    • USP# 6091994- Pulsative manipulation f nervous systems.
    • USP# 5782874- Method and apparatus for manipulating nervous system.
    • USP# 6017302- Subliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous system.
    • USP# 6506148-Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitor.
    All devices are used for Mind Control projects run by CIA or other intelligence agencies. A group of researchers( under the name Dr H Loos) were actually a group of hired professionals for researching and inventing such devices which could be developed and used for mass mind control, PSYOPS, behavior modification later by CIA.
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 18th August 2021 at 18:09.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Constance (18th August 2021), Michel Leclerc (27th October 2021), onawah (19th August 2021)

  5. Link to Post #863
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,728
    Thanks
    30,823
    Thanked 125,714 times in 20,824 posts

    Lightbulb Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    • Children, 5G, Wireless and Health Seminar to Chile Pediatric Society Sociedad Chilena de Pediatría:
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 26th August 2021 at 22:03.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Alecs (27th August 2021), Michel Leclerc (27th October 2021)

  7. Link to Post #864
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,728
    Thanks
    30,823
    Thanked 125,714 times in 20,824 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/1BXyFrzUzpw6


    Derrick Broze breaks down a landmark victory in the fight against 5G technology and EMFs. This is a clip from Free Thinker Radio (8/18/21): The People Are Rising theconsciousresistance.com/free-thinker-radio-8-18-21-the-people-are-rising


    Derrick Broze breaks down a landmark victory in the fight against 5G technology and EMFs. This is a clip from Free Thinker Radio (8/18/21): The People Are Rising
    Find more Free Thinker Radio: thehoustonfreethinkers.com
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 20th August 2021 at 19:01.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Alecs (27th August 2021)

  9. Link to Post #865
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,728
    Thanks
    30,823
    Thanked 125,714 times in 20,824 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Alecs (27th August 2021), DSKlausler (26th August 2021)

  11. Link to Post #866
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,728
    Thanks
    30,823
    Thanked 125,714 times in 20,824 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!


    In a landmark ruling in the case brought by Environmental Health Trust against the Federal Communications Commission, the court ruled the commission’s refusal to update 1996 human exposure limits and its failure to consider non-cancer health effects and environmental impacts from 5G and wireless technologies was capricious, arbitrary, and not evidence-based.
    Stay updated with the latest EHT news by signing up for Environmental Health Trust’s newsletter.


    Washington, D.C.: In a press conference held Aug. 16, 2021, doctors and scientists are calling for action by the federal government after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s August 13, 2021, decision found the Federal Communications Commission failed to explain why it ignored science showing harmful effects from wireless radiation.
    • The Court Decision
    The landmark ruling in the case Environmental Health Trust et al. v the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) found the FCC violated the Administrative Procedure Act because the FCC’s 2019 decision not to update its 1996 exposure limits failed to address impacts of long term wireless exposure, failed to address unique impacts to children, failed to address the testimony of people injured by wireless radiation, failed to address impacts to wildlife and the environment, and failed to address impacts to the developing brain and reproduction.
    The court remanded the issue back to the FCC for reasoned decision making on numerous issues. The court specifically ordered the FCC to do the following:
    1. “Provide a reasoned explanation for its decision to retain its testing procedures for determining whether cell phones and other portable electronic devices comply with its guidelines.”
    2. “Address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure to RF radiation, the ubiquity of wireless devices, and other technological developments that have occurred since the Commission last updated its guidelines.”
    3. “Address the impacts of RF radiation on the environment.”
    Press Conference Read the Transcript

    Expert participants in the press conference include:
    • Devra Davis PhD, MPH, EHT President
    • Dr. Hugh Taylor MD Chair of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine and Yale-New Haven Hospital, president of American Society of Reproductive Medicine
    • Edward B. Myers, EHT attorney
    • Theodora Scarato MSW, EHT Executive Director
    • Frank Clegg, CEO of Canadians for Safe Technology and former President of Microsoft Canada
    • Paul Ben Ishai PhD, Professor Physics at Ariel University
    • Elizabeth Barris, The People’s Initiative Foundation
    • Cindy Franklin, Consumers for Safe Cell Phones
    Full biographies are below.

    “The Commission’s failure to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that exposure to RF radiation at levels below its current limits does not cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer renders inadequate the Commission’s explanation for its failure to discuss the implications of long-term exposure to RF radiation, exposure to RF pulsation or modulation, or the implications of technological developments that have occurred since 1996, including the ubiquity of wireless devices and Wi-Fi, and the emergence of “5G” technology…we find the Commission’s order arbitrary and capricious in its complete failure to respond to comments concerning environmental harm caused by RF radiation.” – US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, August 13, 2021 Ruling
    • The Legal Case
    The case EHT et al. v. FCC centers around the FCC’s safety limits for human exposure to radiofrequency radiation- the wireless radiation emitted from 5G, cell tower, cell phone, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and wireless technologies. These exposure guidelines developed by industry connected groups were adopted in 1996 by the FCC just after the EPA was fully defunded from working on wireless radiation and non-ionizing electromagnetic fields. Until being defunded, EPA had been tasked to develop human exposure limits for wireless- radiofrequency (RF) radiation (See EPA slide presentation, letter updating the FCC on guidelines and US Science Advisory Board recommending the EPA develop guidelines) . FCC limits on human exposure have remained unchanged since 1996.

    In 2013, the FCC asked the question in a formal Inquiry- should these 1996 limits be changed? Do children need more protections? Should the FCC change the way companies radiation test cell phones at a distance from the body? Over 7 years, the FCC received thousands of responses to their Inquiry, all of which were put on the 18-34 record . However in 2019, the FCC issued a decision refusing to change these 1996 exposure limits for wireless radiation. We took the FCC to court because the record contained hundreds of peer reviewed published studies showing harm from wireless radiation at levels that were very low, lower than FCC thresholds. In addition, hundreds of scientists and organizations representing thousands of medical doctors were on the FCC record recommending public exposure be reduced due to this mounting evidence. The vast majority of submissions said loud and clear, “Wireless radiation is harmful. FCC limits do not protect us.”

    Yet the FCC ignored the science and recommendations to change the 1996 safety limits submitted to the record of the 2019 Order Docket 19-226. The FCC then declared that it would retain the existing 1996 wireless RF radiation standards and terminated the Inquiry. FCC limits are based on the premise that overheating is the only harm from wireless radiation. So long as tissue is not overheated, safety can be assured. The FCC even further asserted without evidence that the same approach would prove relevant to the higher frequencies to be used in 5G networks.

    The Environmental Health Trust and our scientific advisors had submitted thousands of pages of evidence to the FCC and met numerous times with FCC staff. When the FCC clearly ignored the science, we took legal action.
    • About Environmental Health Trust
    The Environmental Health Trust, a scientific nonprofit, lead petitioner in the case against the FCC, has worked on the issue of wireless radiation for over a decade submitting thousands of pages of evidence to the FCC in the years leading up to the court’s decision. EHT scientists testified in 2009 Senate hearings (CSPAN link ) and 2008 Congressional hearing (CSPAN link) on cell phone radiation- the last ones ever held. Following the last hearing, EHT held a conference in Washington DC attended by the FCC with presentations by NIH and the American Cancer Society later followed by the release of a Research Agenda. Although funding for US government research in the area dried up, EHT scientists continued to publish numerous studies on the health effects of non -ionizing electromagnetic radiation and organized numerous national and international scientific conferences on the issue.

    EHT co-founder Dr. Ronald Herberman, who founded the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (UPCI) and helped discover natural killer cells capable of killing cancer . issued the first recommendations by a US medical institution to his faculty recommending that they reduce cell phone radiation in a memo featured in the New York Times article “Researcher warns of brain cancer risk from cell phones.”
    EHT sent a letter to President Biden calling for federal accountability on this issue. EHT coordinated a letter to the FDA on their biased 2020 literature review on the science on cell phones and cancer. EHT has sent letters to the National Park Service, and governments of France, Bermuda, India, Guernsey, British Columbia Trustee’s and more. EHT’s resources include a database on international policy action, letters by scientists on 5G, practical steps to reduce exposure, printable resources on safe technology, a video library, toolkits on Wi-Fi in School and 5G.
    • Bios of Press Conference Panelists
    Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, Co-founder and president of Environmental Health Trust

    Devra Davis PhD, MPH was a founding director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and has worked on numerous environmental exposures, from chemicals to lead to air pollution. Among the NAS reports she directed were those advising that tobacco smoke be removed from airplanes and the environments of young children. She was also a Clinton appointee to the Chemical Safety And Hazard Investigation Board,former Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Health in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, anda member of the team of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scientists awarded the Nobel Peace Prize with the Honorable Al Gore in 2007.
    • Dr. Hugh S. Taylor, MD, Chair of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine and Yale-New Haven Hospital, president of American Society of Reproductive Medicine
    Dr. Hugh S. Taylor MD has served as President of the Society for Reproductive Investigation and will be president of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in 2021. He is a member of the National Academy of Medicine. Dr. Taylor is the Anita O’Keeffe Young Professor and Chair, Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at Yale School of Medicine and Chief of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Yale-New Haven Hospital.

    Dr. Taylor’s research on prenatal exposure to cell phone radiation was published in Scientific Reports. Dr. Taylor is also Professor of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental biology at Yale University. Dr. Hugh Taylor received his undergraduate training at Yale University, his medical degree from the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, residency in Obstetrics and Gynecology at Yale and his postdoctoral training included a fellowship in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility as well as a fellowship in Molecular Biology, both at Yale. Dr. Taylor is a board certified specialist in Obstetrics and Gynecology and in Reproductive Endocrinology. He is a recipient of ten National Institutes of Health research grants and directs The Yale Center for Reproductive Biology. Dr. Taylor has published more than 400 articles and in leading medical journals.
    • Edward B. Myers, Attorney for Environmental Health Trust in EHT et al. v. FCC
    Edward B. Myers has practiced law over 40 years representing government, trade associations, and private clients in complex regulatory matters involving energy, telecommunications, and the environment. In 2018, Mr. Myers worked with the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) in a successful challenge to an order of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that had sought to eliminate any environmental review of 5G cell towers and transmitters. The NRDC filed an amicus brief in the EHT case. Mr. Myers is a graduate of Gettysburg College and the University of Notre Dame Law School.
    • Frank Clegg, CEO of Canadians for Safe Technology and former President of Microsoft Canada
    Frank Clegg founded Canadians for Safe Technology (C4ST), a national, not-for-profit, volunteer-based coalition of parents, citizens, and experts. C4ST’s mission is to 1) educate and inform Canadians and policy makers about the dangers of the exposures to unsafe levels of radiation from technology; and 2) to work with all levels of government to create healthier communities for children and families.
    Mr. Clegg was the President of Microsoft Canada from 1991 to 1996 and was re-appointed to that post from 2000-2005. He has played a leadership role in the country’s technology sector and in the broader Canadian community for many years. Mr. Clegg holds an Honors Degree in Mathematics from the University of Waterloo.
    • Paul Ben Ishai, PhD, Professor Physics at Ariel University
    Paul Ben Ishai PhD is currently a Senior Lecturer with the Department of Physics, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel, and the Head of the Laboratory of Terahertz Dielectric Spectroscopy. He was the Director of the Hebrew University’s Center for Electromagnetic Research and Characterization, Department of Applied Physics and has published over 50 articles including several papers on 5G frequencies and the skin. Until 2016, he was involved with the Laboratory of Prof. Feldman, concentrating on dielectric research. His research interests include soft condensed matter physics, glassy dynamics, biophysics, sub-terahertz spectroscopy, and dielectric spectroscopy. He currently holds 3 patents in these fields. He received the Ph.D. degree in applied physics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    Theodora Scarato directs EHT programs and coordinates scientific programs in the US and internationally with EHTs Senior Science Advisors. Scarato is lead policy analyst and researcher for the EHT database on international actions– the most comprehensive collection of information on policy actions on cell phones and wireless.
    Scarato has led efforts for federal accountability. She is on the board of PhoneGate Alert. Her Freedom of Information requests found the CDC hired an industry consultant for website rewrites. Her communications with the EPA were submitted as key evidence in the Natural Resources Defense Council Amicus Brief submitted in the FCC lawsuit and provide critical information for legislators. She also coordinated the scientific review of the Oregon Health Department Report on wireless radiation which resulted in a planned September 2021 hearing in the Oregon Senate to investigate the issue. She has championed efforts for safe technology in schools and her efforts lead to the Maryland Council on Children’s Environmental Health to issue recommendations to reduce children’s Wi-Fi exposure. She has coordinated efforts to hold the WHO EMF Project accountable to their online factsheets that downplay the science and the letter by scientists to the WHO EMF Project remains unanswered to this day. Scarato has long worked to showcase the conflicts of interest at ICNIRP as documented in scientific articles and was featured in an European Parliament member’s report on ICNIRP conflict of interests.

    Scarato co-authored a landmark paper on why and how to reduce radiofrequency wireless in buildings and has presented at the National Institutes of Health, the New Hampshire State 5G Commission, the San Francisco Teachers Union, the University of California San Francisco and the American Federation of Teachers.
    ps: there is an unknown Project Avalon Admin or Moderator (that remains cowardly anonymous) for adding "5g fear porn" tag to this Stop5G Forum Thread afraid to debate me ... sad.
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 26th August 2021 at 23:20.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Alecs (27th August 2021), Michel Leclerc (27th October 2021), Reinhard (4th December 2021)

  13. Link to Post #867
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,728
    Thanks
    30,823
    Thanked 125,714 times in 20,824 posts

    Thumbs up Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    • HISTORIC WIN AGAINST 5G DANGERS



    Children’s Health Defense earned a huge legal win in the court of appeals this week against the 1996 FCC safety guidance stating that wireless technology is safe unless it raises the temperature of your internal organs. Another step closer to bringing attention to the serious safety and privacy concerns with the mass rollout of 5G.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Alecs (27th August 2021), Michel Leclerc (27th October 2021), onawah (8th October 2021), Reinhard (8th October 2021)

  15. Link to Post #868
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,682
    Thanked 116,097 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    4 States. 5 Major Victories
    email update from: Americans for Responsible Tech. info@americansforresponsibletech.org via gmail.mcsv.net
    10/7/21
    TOGETHER, WE WON.

    "Plus 4 more exciting victories to report...

    After months of non-stop lobbying, letter writing campaigns, op-ed submissions, testifying at public hearings, and so, so much more...

    ...on Monday, October 4th, Governor Newsom VETOED SB-556.

    556 was a telecom-industry sponsored bill that would have removed significant local control over the deployment of 5G antennas in communities across the entire State of California.

    The telecoms thought they had this one in the bag...until they didn't.

    We want to reiterate our sincere thanks to all of the individuals and groups in California and beyond who helped make this victory possible. We are proud to have played a part in this great, collective success.
    Excerpt from Governor Gavin Newsom's Veto Statement for SB-556:

    "I am returning Senate Bill 556 without my signature.

    This bill would restrict the ability of local governments and publicly-owned electric utilities to regulate the placement of small cell wireless facilities on public infrastructure and limit the compensation that may be collected for use of these public assets."

    -Governor Gavin Newsom
    Read Governor Newsom's Full Veto Statement Here
    Four states. Four more wins.
    What's the winning strategy for cell towers?
    One word: AESTHETICS.
    1. Sylvania, OH - In a 6-0 vote, Sylvania, OH City Council unanimously denies construction of 140-foot Tarpon Towers/Verizon cell tower at Northview High School. (To our knowledge, the City Council has not yet issued a written decision on this matter. However, you can view a recording of the final vote on the tower beginning at minute 15:10 of this video.) Note: We were happy to assist Sylvania residents defeat this ill-sited facility.

    2. Lakeland, FL - Lakeland wins lawsuit over proposed cell tower near historic Dixieland. Read the news here. Forward the court's written decision to your local elected officials (mayor, city council members, city attorney, etc.). Let them know that they can legally fight towers on the basis of aesthetics and historic preservation! Note: This news is from July, 2021.

    3. Brawley, CA - City Council unanimously rejects proposed installation of cell tower in heart of residential area, adjacent to playing fields. Read the news here. Note: We were happy to assist Brawley residents defeat this ill-sited facility.

    4. Loudon County, VA - Loudoun County Board of Supervisors denies proposed AT&T cell tower facility atop Short Hill Mountain ridgeline due to aesthetic concerns and community backlash. Read the news here https://www.loudountimes.com/news/lo...04beb2700.html

    Proposed installation site for approx. 110-foot cell tower in Brawley, California nestled in the heart of a residential area, adjacent to multiple playing fields.
    PRO-TIP #1: In our experience, the most consistent winning strategy for fighting unwanted cell towers is arguing that the tower will impose an eyesore on your community, devalue nearby properties, and/or have a detrimental visual impact on surrounding historic areas.

    PRO-TIP #2: Ensure that your local telecommunications ordinance is up-to-date and contains specific language to protect residents of your community from ill-sited 5G "small cell" antennas.

    PRO-TIP #3: Want to stay ahead of the curve on wireless antenna installations in your area? File a FOIL request (or your state's equivalent) on your locality's website. Ask to review all pending applications for wireless telecommunications facilities within a one-mile radius of your home. Contact your local clerk if you have questions or concerns about how to do this.

    *Please email us if you need assistance! info@americansforresponsibletech.org
    Again, thank you to all of the organizations and individuals who have helped implement our political strategy in California and around the country. Our movement is growing rapidly, with a "reach" now exceeding over 600,000 individuals a month."
    .

    -The ART Team
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  16. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Alecs (1st December 2021), ExomatrixTV (29th October 2021), Michel Leclerc (27th October 2021), Philippe (8th October 2021), Reinhard (8th October 2021)

  17. Link to Post #869
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,682
    Thanked 116,097 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Petition Filed in U.S. Supreme Court
    10/26/21
    From today's email update: Arthur Firstenberg <info@cellphonetaskforce.org>

    The article at: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/w...-Yesterday.pdf



    "The Santa Fe Alliance for Public Health and Safety filed a petition yesterday afternoon asking the U.S. Supreme Court to rule on a threat to the very existence of this country, and this world.

    Twenty-five years ago, Congress passed a law that permitted the unlimited pollution of every square inch of this country with microwave radiation. The polluters -- telecommuni­cations companies -- were exempted from all liability for injury, death and property damage. Cities and states were forbidden to protect their citizens. State courts were prohibited from hearing lawsuits. The millions of people who have been injured, killed, and deprived of their income and property by cell towers and antennas have had no remedy for their injuries, deaths and losses.

    The law that accomplished this assault on our country is the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Section 704 of that law states:

    “No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.”

    The “Commission” is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which has no authority over health or environment, and does not even have the power to enforce its own regulations concerning microwave (also called radio frequency) radiation. The result of Section 704 is that no one has been protecting our country, our citizens, and our environment from this radiation for the past 25 years -- not the FCC, not the states, not the cities, and not the courts.

    The advent of 5G technology has brought this situation to a crisis point. Like many other cities, Santa Fe, New Mexico passed an ordinance exempting antennas in the public rights-of-way from all land use requirements, and in 2018, franchises were awarded to five telecommunications companies to place cell towers and antennas anywhere they please in the streets and on the sidewalks of Santa Fe. The Santa Fe Alliance for Public Health and Safety immediately filed a lawsuit in federal district court. That lawsuit is now before the highest court in the land.

    We are asking the Supreme Court to rule on two related questions:

    1. Does Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 violate the right of access to courts guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution?

    2. Does “environmental effects” mean “health effects” in Section 704?

    Either an affirmative answer to the first question, or a negative answer to the second, would immediately restore to all Americans the right to protect their health, their lives and their property from microwave radiation, and would subject telecommunications companies to liability for the injuries, deaths and property damage they are causing.

    The petition we filed in the Supreme Court yesterday is here:

    https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/w...i-as-filed.pdf

    We need as many organizations as possible to support this petition by joining the amicus (friend of the court) brief that is now being prepared, and which must be filed in the Supreme Court by November 24, 2021. The Supreme Court picks and chooses the cases it will decide, and the more support we have from organizations throughout the world, the more likely the Court will grant our petition and hear our case. The granting of our petition, by itself, will get publicity, and will advance public awareness of this invisible threat to our nation.

    Simply talking to one another, putting on conferences, organizing protests, and filing lawsuits against the FCC, which has no authority over health, has not and cannot advance our cause to any significant degree. The proper target for attack is not the FCC, but the unconstitutional law that Congress passed 25 years ago. If your organization would like to join the amicus brief and has not already done so, please send the following information to me at info@cellphonetaskforce.org as soon as possible:

    1. Organization's name, email address, mailing address, and phone number
    2. Your name and your role in the organization
    3. Organization's website and social media URLs (if any)
    4. Roughly, how many members?
    5. Mission statement
    6. Is your organization for profit?
    7. Any other information you would like to share

    Thank you.

    Donations in any amount are always appreciated. This litigation has been costly. The Cellular Phone Task Force is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, and donations from U.S. residents are tax-deductible.


    DONATE


    Arthur Firstenberg
    Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
    P.O. Box 6216
    Santa Fe, NM 87502
    USA
    phone: +1 505-471-0129
    arthur@cellphonetaskforce.org
    October 26, 2021

    The last 29 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading
    and sharing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force. https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/newsletters/
    Some of the newsletters are also available there in
    German, Spanish, Italian, French and Norwegian.

    To subscribe, go to www.cellphonetaskforce.org/subscribe"
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  18. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    DaveToo (26th October 2021), ExomatrixTV (29th October 2021), Michel Leclerc (27th October 2021), Reinhard (4th December 2021)

  19. Link to Post #870
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    1,790
    Thanks
    5,347
    Thanked 10,971 times in 1,706 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Me thinks there's a wee bit of a double standard going on here.

    We must fight CLIMATE CHANGE with all our might to keep the world
    in harmony with nature, BUT...

    We should not fight EMF CHANGE with all our might to keep the world
    in harmony with nature.

    Huh???

    Greta you can't have your cake and your 5G cellphone too!
    Last edited by DaveToo; 27th October 2021 at 23:08. Reason: Symmetry of all-caps 'CHANGE'

  20. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    Brigantia (27th October 2021), ExomatrixTV (29th October 2021), hm337 (2nd November 2021), onawah (27th October 2021), Reinhard (4th December 2021)

  21. Link to Post #871
    UK Avalon Member Lariliss's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th October 2021
    Location
    UK
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 58 times in 11 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Dears,
    We are exposed to EMF for generations.
    1. Telecommunication:
    has very strict EMF control, installed even outdoors so that it is not affecting the human body. Indoors regulations sometimes are so high, that it is hard to get the coverage with indoor antennas. 2G/3G/4G/5G, the same, if we have all of them on the site, they are summed. The higher ‘G’ the less is transmitter power.
    next generation step means more effective spectrum usage; 5G is the same Hertz as Wi-Fi, but technically, it has better performance for moving objects, better latency and it is telecom;
    a microwave oven is in the same spectrum and is more dangerous near to you making dinner hot.
    2. Wi-Fi is already mentioned, it is all around indoors competing telecom for data users.
    3. Industry. Mining is going deeper and getting more dangerous, breaking the boarders of human safety regulations. We send 250 ton vehicles, carrying 250 of ore more on itself without, fully autonomous without any humans to be in danger. Thanks to 5G technology.

    All the wireless coverage providers go through the path of regulations and restrictions before making a new roll out and they have to pass the checks.
    5G transmitters will reuse 4G sites and even make the EMF less with more efficient technology replacement.

    It is the responsibility of every one habits, life style and comfort zones.
    Nice to sit in a warm house watching the cold outside and sending messages, using wi-fi, while my 4G mobile gets calls and my bath gets warm.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to Lariliss For This Post:

    Reinhard (4th December 2021)

  23. Link to Post #872
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,682
    Thanked 116,097 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    THE MOST DANGEROUS TECHNOLOGY EVER INVENTED Part Two
    Arthur Firstenberg <info@cellphonetaskforce.org>
    10/27/21
    https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/w...d-Part-Two.pdf



    "There is No Dose Response for Microwave Radiation

    The selling of cell phones is, and always has been, based on lies and deception. The biggest lie is that they are “low power” devices and that this makes them safe. That is a double lie. It is a lie because they are not low power. If you put a cell phone -- any cell phone -- in your hand or next to your body, you are being blasted by more microwave radiation from your phone than you are getting from any cell tower, and by ten billion times as much microwave radiation as you are getting from the sun, the Milky Way, or any other natural sources. The exposure guidelines established by the Federal Communications Commission reflect this reality: cell towers are permitted to expose your body at a specific absorption rate of 0.08 watts per kilogram, while cell phones are allowed to expose your brain at a specific absorption rate of 1.6 watts per kilogram, which is twenty times higher.

    And it is a lie because low power devices are not any safer than high power devices. The reason for this is that electromagnetic fields are not toxins in the ordinary sense, and the rule in toxicology that a lower dose is a safer dose does not apply to microwave radiation. As Allan Frey wrote in 1990:

    “Electromagnetic fields are not a foreign substance to living beings like lead or cyanide. With foreign substances, the greater the dose, the greater the effect -- a dose-response relationship. Rather, living beings are electrochemical systems that use low frequency EMFs in everything from protein folding through cellular communication to nervous system function. To model how EMFs affect living beings, one might compare them to the radio we use to listen to music... If you impose on the radio an appropriately tuned EMF or harmonic, even if it is very weak, it will interfere with the music. Similarly, if we impose a very weak EMF signal on a living being, it has the possibility of interfering with normal function if it is properly tuned. That is the model that much biological data and theory tell us to use, not a toxicological model.”

    The most thorough investigation of the blood-brain barrier effect, which Frey discovered in 1975, was done at Lund University in Sweden beginning in the late 1980s with various sources of microwave radiation and later, in the 1990s and 2000s, with actual cell phones. They found not only that there is not a dose response, but that there is an inverse dose response for this type of injury. They exposed laboratory rats to what is now called 2G cell phone radiation, and then they reduced the power level of the radiation ten-fold, a hundred-fold, a thousand-fold, and ten thousand-fold. And they found, to their surprise, that the greatest damage to the blood-brain barrier occurred not in the rats that were exposed at full power, but in the rats that were exposed to phones whose radiation was reduced by a factor of ten thousand! This was the equivalent of holding a cell phone more than one meter away from your body. The leader of the research team, neurosurgeon Leif Salford, warned that non-users of cell phones were being damaged by their neighbors’ cell phones, and that this technology was “the world’s largest biological experiment ever.”

    And in a further set of experiments, published in 2003, Salford’s team exposed young rats to what is now called a 2G cell phone, just once for two hours, either at full power, or at two different levels of reduced power, and sacrificed them 50 days later to examine their brains. They found that a single exposure to an ordinary cell phone operating at normal power had permanently destroyed up to 2% of almost all the rats. Damaged neurons dominated the picture in some areas of their brains. When the power of the phone was reduced ten-fold it caused brain damage in every rat. When the power of the phone was reduced one hundred-fold, this type of permanent brain damage was observed in half of the exposed animals.

    And in still further experiments, published in 2008, they exposed rats to a cell phone for two hours once a week for a year, still using what is now called a 2G cell phone. The exposed rats suffered from impaired memory, regardless of whether they were exposed at an SAR level of 60 milliwatts per kilogram or 0.6 milliwatts per kilogram. In other words, reducing the power level by a factor of one hundred did not make the cell phone less dangerous.

    The lack of a dose response has been reported over and over. Physicist Carl Blackman spent much of his career at the Environmental Protection Agency figuring out why not only particular frequencies but also particular power levels of RF radiation cause calcium to flow out of brain cells. Ross Adey at UCLA, Jean-Louis Schwartz at the National Research Council of Canada, and Jitendra Behari at Jawaharlal University in India reported the same thing. Geneticist Sisir Dutta, studying the same phenomenon at Howard University in 1986, found peaks of calcium flow at SAR levels of 2 W/kg and 1 W/kg, and also at .05, .0028, .001, .0007, and .0005 W/kg, with some effect all the way down to .0001 W/kg. The effect at 0.0007 W/kg SAR was quadruple the effect at 2.0 W/kg, in other words a 3,000-fold reduction in power level resulted in a 4-fold increase in calcium disturbance. The frequency was 915 MHz, the same frequency that was later to be used for cell phones.

    Maria Sadchikova and her Soviet colleagues, in the 1960s and 1970s, examined hundreds of workers exposed to microwave radiation on the job, and consistently found that the sickest workers were the ones who were exposed to the lowest, not the highest power levels.

    Igor Belyaev, at Stockholm University, found that genetic effects occurred at specific frequencies and that the magnitude of the effect did not change with power level over 16 orders of magnitude, all the way down to 0.000000000000000001 watts per square centimeter, a level that is one quadrillion times lower than what a cell phone delivers to one’s brain.

    Dimitris Panagopoulos, at the University of Athens, found that fruit flies exposed to a cell phone for just one minute a day for five days produced 36 percent fewer offspring than flies that were not exposed at all. When he exposed them to the phone for six minutes a day for five days, it reduced the number of their offspring by 50 to 60 percent. And the maximum effect occurred when the cell phone was about one foot away from the flies, not when it was touching the vial that the flies were in. In further research, he showed that the effect is due to DNA damage and consequent cell death caused by the radiation.

    In another experiment, Panagopoulos’s colleague, Lukas Margaritis, exposed fruit flies to various frequencies of RF radiation at exposure levels ranging from 0.0001 watts per kilogram to 0.04 watts per kilogram, and found that even a single exposure to any of these frequencies at any of these power levels for just 6 minutes caused a significant amount of ovarian cell death.

    And in further research, Margaritis’s team exposed fruit flies to a cell phone either once for 6 minutes, once for 12 minutes, 6 minutes a day for 3 days, or 12 minutes a day for 3 days. Under each condition the phone tripled to sextupled the amount of ovarian cell death. And then this team tried other sources of microwave radiation for between 10 and 30 minutes per day for up to 9 days and found that each of them reduced the number of offspring by between 11 and 32 percent. The cell phone and the cordless phone had the greatest effect, but the WiFi, the baby monitor, the Bluetooth, and the microwave oven also substantially reduced the fecundity of the flies.

    The effects on insects are so obvious that even a high school student can easily demonstrate them. In 2004, Alexander Chan, a sophomore at Benjamin Cardozo High School in Queens, New York, exposed fruit fly larvae daily to a loudspeaker, a computer monitor, and a cell phone for a science fair project and observed their development. The flies that were exposed to the cell phone failed to develop wings.

    What Are We Doing to Nature?

    We are distressing and disorienting not only birds, but also, as is being discovered, insects. It appears that all little creatures that have antennae use them to send and receive communications electronically -- communications that are being interfered with and drowned out by the much more powerful communications of our wireless devices.

    When honey bees perform their waggle dance to inform one another of the location of food sources, it is not only a visual dance but an electromagnetic one. During the dance they generate electromagnetic signals with a modulation frequency between 180 and 250 Hz. And they send another kind of signal, which has been called the “stop” signal, up to 100 milliseconds long, at a frequency of 320 Hz. The stop signal is used when the colony already has too much food, and it causes the dancers to stop dancing and leave the dance floor. Uwe Greggers, at Freie Universität Berlin, discovered that bees will start walking and actively moving their antennae in response to artificially generated electromagnetic fields that imitate these natural signals, even in the absence of any visual or auditory cues. Bees whose antennae he had removed or coated with wax did not respond to these signals.

    Pollination is also dependent on electromagnetic communication -- between bees and flowers. Bees carry positive charge on their bodies from flying in the global atmospheric electric field, while flowers, being connected to the earth, carry a negative charge. Dominic Clarke, at the University of Bristol, has proved that not only does this facilitate pollen transfer from flowers to bees, but that bees sense and are attracted not only to the colors of flowers but also to the distinct patterns of their electric fields. The electric field of a flower diminishes immediately after being visited by a bee, and other bees “see” this and only visit flowers whose electric field is robust. While honey bees see the fields with their antennae, bumble bees see the fields more with the hairs that cover their bodies, which not only make them such distinctive creatures but also function as a kind of antenna.

    In 2007, German biologist Ulrich Warnke published an important booklet in both English and German titled Bees, Birds and Mankind: Destroying Nature by “Elektrosmog” (Bienen, Vögel und Menschen: Die Zerstörung der Natur durch ‚Elektrosmog'). In it, he reminded us that there are only two long-range forces -- gravity and electromagnetism -- that shape everything in the universe including our bodies, and that we ignore that fact at our peril. Electricity is the foundation of life, he warned, and “this destruction of the foundation of life has already wiped out many species forever.” We cannot immerse our world, he said, in a sea of electromagnetic radiation that is up to 10,000,000,000 times as strong as the natural radiation that we evolved with without destroying all of life. He summarized the research that he and others had done with honey bees. It is no wonder, wrote Warnke, that bees are disappearing all over the world.

    They began disappearing at the dawn of the radio age. On the small island lying off England’s southern coast where Guglielmo Marconi sent the world’s first long-distance radio transmission in 1901, the honey bees began to vanish. By 1906, the island, then host to the greatest density of radio transmissions in the world, was almost empty of bees. Thousands, unable to fly, were found crawling and dying on the ground outside their hives. Healthy bees imported from the mainland began dying within a week of arrival. In the following decades, Isle of Wight disease spread along with radio broadcasting to the rest of Great Britain, and to Italy, France, Switzerland, Germany, Brazil, Australia, Canada, South Africa, and the United States. In the 1960s and 1970s its name changed to “disappearing disease.” It became urgent in the late 1990s with the wireless revolution, and became a worldwide emergency by 2006, when it was renamed “colony collapse disorder.” Today not only domestic bees, but all wild bees, are in danger of extinction.

    Amphibians are not only disappearing, but large numbers of amphibian species have already gone extinct, even in the most remote, pristine areas of the world -- pristine, that is, except for communication towers and radar stations emitting microwave radiation. Amphibians are the most vulnerable of all classes of animals on the planet to electromagnetic radiation, and they have been dwindling and going extinct since the 1980s. When I looked into this in 1996, every species of frog and toad in Yosemite National Park was disappearing. In the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve of Costa Rica, the famous and highly protected golden toad had gone extinct. Eight of thirteen frog species in a Brazilian rainforest preserve had gone extinct. The famous gastric-brooding frog of Australia was extinct. Seventy-five species of the colorful harlequin frogs that once graced streams in the tropics of the Western Hemisphere were extinct. Today, more than half of all known kinds of frogs, salamanders and caecilians (snake-like amphibians), amounting to 4,300 species, are either extinct or in danger of extinction.

    In 1996, when cell towers marched into remote areas of the United States, mutant frogs began turning up by the thousands in lakes, streams and forests all across the American Midwest. Their deformed legs, extra legs, missing eyes, misplaced eyes, and other genetic mistakes were frightening school children out on field trips.

    In 2009, wildlife biologist Alfonso Balmori did a simple, obvious experiment on the balcony of an apartment in Valladolid, Spain not far from a cell tower, an experiment that proved what was happening: he raised tadpoles in two identical tanks, except over one of them he draped a thin layer of fabric that was woven with metallic fibers, which admitted air and light but kept out radio waves. The results shocked even Balmori: in a period of two months, 90 percent of the tadpoles in the tank without the shielding had died, versus only 4 percent in the shielded tank.

    Similar shielding experiments have confirmed, in spades, what is happening to birds, and what is happening to our forests.

    Scientists at the University of Oldenburg in Germany were shocked to find, beginning in 2004, that the migratory songbirds they had been studying were no longer able to orient themselves toward the north in spring and toward the southwest in autumn. Suspecting that electromagnetic pollution might be responsible, they did for their birds what Balmori did for his tadpoles a few years later: they shielded the aviary from radio waves during the winter with aluminum sheeting. “The effect on the birds’ orientation capabilities was profound,” wrote the scientists. The birds all oriented toward the north the following spring.

    And in 2007, in a backyard laboratory in the foothills of Colorado’s Rocky Mountains, Katie Haggerty decided to do the same experiment with aspen seedlings. She wanted to find out if radio waves were responsible for the decline of aspen trees all over Colorado that had begun in 2004. She grew 27 aspen trees -- nine without any screening, nine with aluminum window screening around their pots which kept out radio waves, and nine with fiberglass screening which kept out just as much light but let in all the radio waves. After two months, the new shoots of the radio-shielded aspens were 74 percent longer, and their leaves 60 percent larger, than those of either the mock-shielded or the unshielded aspens. And in the fall, the shielded trees had large, healthy leaves in brilliant fall colors that aspens are famous for: bright orange, yellow, green, dark red, and black. The mock-shielded and unshielded trees had small leaves in drab yellow and green, covered with gray and brown areas of decay. The only thing that had changed in Colorado’s Rocky Mountains in 2004 was the installation of a new emergency communication system called the Digital Trunked Radio System composed of 203 radio towers whose transmissions covered every square inch of the state.

    (to be continued)


    Arthur Firstenberg
    Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
    P.O. Box 6216
    Santa Fe, NM 87502
    USA
    phone: +1 505-471-0129
    arthur@cellphonetaskforce.org
    October 27, 2021

    The last 29 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading
    and sharing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force.
    Some of the newsletters are also available there in
    German, Spanish, Italian, French and Norwegian.

    To subscribe, go to www.cellphonetaskforce.org/subscribe or click on this link: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/subscribe/ "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  24. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (28th October 2021), DaveToo (27th October 2021), ExomatrixTV (29th October 2021), hm337 (2nd November 2021), Michel Leclerc (27th October 2021), Reinhard (29th October 2021), ThePythonicCow (28th October 2021)

  25. Link to Post #873
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,682
    Thanked 116,097 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    It appears we have a 5G shill in our midst.
    Quote Posted by Lariliss (here)
    Dears,
    We are exposed to EMF for generations.
    1. Telecommunication:
    has very strict EMF control, installed even outdoors so that it is not affecting the human body. Indoors regulations sometimes are so high, that it is hard to get the coverage with indoor antennas. 2G/3G/4G/5G, the same, if we have all of them on the site, they are summed. The higher ‘G’ the less is transmitter power.
    next generation step means more effective spectrum usage; 5G is the same Hertz as Wi-Fi, but technically, it has better performance for moving objects, better latency and it is telecom;
    a microwave oven is in the same spectrum and is more dangerous near to you making dinner hot.
    2. Wi-Fi is already mentioned, it is all around indoors competing telecom for data users.
    3. Industry. Mining is going deeper and getting more dangerous, breaking the boarders of human safety regulations. We send 250 ton vehicles, carrying 250 of ore more on itself without, fully autonomous without any humans to be in danger. Thanks to 5G technology.

    All the wireless coverage providers go through the path of regulations and restrictions before making a new roll out and they have to pass the checks.
    5G transmitters will reuse 4G sites and even make the EMF less with more efficient technology replacement.

    It is the responsibility of every one habits, life style and comfort zones.
    Nice to sit in a warm house watching the cold outside and sending messages, using wi-fi, while my 4G mobile gets calls and my bath gets warm.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  26. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    DeeMetrios (3rd November 2021), ExomatrixTV (29th October 2021), jaybee (5th November 2021), Michel Leclerc (27th October 2021), Reinhard (4th December 2021)

  27. Link to Post #874
    Belgium Avalon Member
    Join Date
    6th April 2014
    Location
    France
    Language
    Dutch, French
    Age
    74
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    10,406
    Thanked 6,208 times in 747 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Dear Onawah,

    Some time ago I visited a family member, who is a mathematician by profession. He invited me to visit his garden, and his fruit trees. His garden was divided in square plots between which a regular grid of paths allowed one to see and use every one of the plots. Each of the five or six plots was planted with apple and pear trees, 16 per plot, in a 4 x 4 pattern.
    As he lived in an area not far from the middle-sized towns Belgium is sprinkled with, as is, as you know, your Netherlands, I asked about pollination. Were there sufficient bees?
    Oh, that is not a problem, he replied, I buy them. You buy bees, really? (I was thinking of the truckloads of bees carted from all over the United States to the Californian almond tree groves, so that the world can eat almonds.) Yes, he said, I buy them in boxes. Boxes? Yes, neat cubes of cardboard of (I do not remember the number of centimeters, let’s call the number x then) x by x by x centimeters.

    A number of years earlier I discussed with my language and communication students in the business entities I had as my company’s customers the fate of the young girls murdered in the early 90s’ pedosexual crime crisis in Belgium. The consensus among my students was that it was far better for all those girls to have died or been killed than that they would have had to live on with the memories of what had been done to them.

    As long as I can afford good honey from far-away mountainous areas, why would I worry about bees?

    As long as I manage to protect my own children, why would I worry about the neighbours‘s kids being eaten alive?

    That was the situation, in Belgium, twenty to thirty years ago.
    What we are witnessing now, with people being complicit in murder and suicide on a gigantic scale, is the outcome of the suppression of pain and guilt – especially guilt – twenty to thirty years ago.

    As the bees, we have lost our ability to fly by intuition. We dance, alone, with headphones on, in dancings for hundreds of people who do not touch each other, instead of dancing sophisticated ballets showing each other where food is, for body, soul, consciousness, spirit.

    As the neighbour’s girls, we are being eaten alive, this time from the inside out.

    ...

    (I do love mathematics.)
    Last edited by Michel Leclerc; 27th October 2021 at 22:20.

  28. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Michel Leclerc For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (28th October 2021), DaveToo (27th October 2021), DeeMetrios (3rd November 2021), jaybee (5th November 2021), onawah (28th October 2021), Reinhard (29th October 2021)

  29. Link to Post #875
    Serbia Avalon Member
    Join Date
    30th October 2021
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 129 times in 20 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    5G is not needed for faster internet on mobile phones - it is fast enough. 5G is not needed for industrial robots and for in-home smart devices, as those are attached to LAN or Wi-Fi access points. 5G is perhaps needed for something else. But what?

    5G should not be looked in isolation from other conspiracy theories. We have theories about graphene being put in chemtrails, food, vaccines, masks, PCR tests. Why graphene? Because this material of the future is extremely thin (2D layer of carbon atoms), extremely strong and super conductive. Graphene is exceptionally good for making brain to computing interfaces. Look at this video



    InBrain company specialize in producing graphene based man to machine interfaces for medical purposes.

    Quote We are developing the next generation of neuroelectronic therapies powered by machine learning. Our graphene-brain interfaces have the capability of reading at a resolution never seen before, as well as detecting therapy-specific biomarkers and triggering highly focal adaptive neuromodulation for increased outcomes in personalised neurological therapies.
    https://www.inbrain-neuroelectronics.com/

    Look at this scientific papers:

    1. Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells​

    Quote On the other side, graphene can be exploited as a substrate for tissue engineering. In this case, conductivity is probably the most relevant amongst the various properties of the different graphene materials, as it may allow to instruct and interrogate neural networks, as well as to drive neural growth and differentiation, which holds a great potential in regenerative medicine.
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29695956/

    2. Bioinspired mechano-photonic artificial synapse based on graphene/MoS2 heterostructure​
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abd9117

    So, there is work on graphene based brain interfaces (company inBrain) the work on building graphene based synthetic synapses used in artificial neural networks (paper 2) and work on interfacing graphene with neural cells(1). We know that science development in military and secret labs is years ahead of the one published in scientific papers.

    What if the agenda behind 5G and Graphene spreading is one agenda - a plan to connect us all to artificial intelligence? What if the end game is the assimilation of humans into AI grid? Perhaps top elites have already gone through the assimilation process and now the process is by them imposed on lower levels in hierarchy and eventually on all humans.

  30. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to hm337 For This Post:

    DaveToo (2nd November 2021), DeeMetrios (3rd November 2021), jaybee (5th November 2021), onawah (5th November 2021), Reinhard (5th November 2021)

  31. Link to Post #876
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,682
    Thanked 116,097 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    The Most Dangerous Technology Ever Invented - Part Three
    11/4/21
    Arthur Firstenberg info@cellphonetaskforce.org
    https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/w...Part-Three.pdf


    "Cell Phones Are Not Here to Stay

    On the day digital cell phone service began in New York City, I was away from home at a three-day law conference. The day I returned home I became dizzy. Within a few days I was also nauseous and I had uncontrollable tremors. I had the first asthma attack of my life. My eyeballs felt like they were bulging out, my lips felt dry, fat and puffy, I felt pressure in my chest, and the bottoms of my feet hurt. I became so weak I couldn’t lift a book. My skin became so sensitive I couldn’t bear to be touched and I could hardly stand to wear my clothes. My head was roaring like a freight train. After the fourth day I could not sleep or eat. During the sixth night my larynx went into spasm three times. Each time that happened I couldn’t draw a breath in or out and I thought I was going to die. I left home the next morning, never to return.

    This did not happen only to me, or only to a few people. Beginning November 14, 1996, the day Omnipoint Communications turned on all those cell towers, hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers became suddenly ill. Many thought they were having a heart attack, a stroke or a nervous breakdown. The Health Department called it an influenza epidemic, and it lasted until the following May. They did not stop to wonder why it hit only New York and not any nearby cities at that time. Weekly mortality statistics from the Centers for Disease Control revealed a 17 percent rise in mortality in the city beginning the week of November 17, lasting 11 weeks, that killed 2,300 people.

    The epidemic did not hit Boston until the following year, when Sprint began service there on November 12, 1997. Mortality spiked by 15.5% for 16 weeks. It hit San Diego when Pacific Bell began service there on November 1, 1996, lasted for 17 weeks, and raised mortality by 14.5%. It did not hit nearby Los Angeles until the following summer, when Pacific Bell began service there on July 3, 1997, and mortality rose by 30% for the next 15 weeks. It hit Philadelphia in the spring, when Sprint began service there on April 3, 1997, and Detroit in the fall, when Sprint began service there on October 15, 1997. It hit Jacksonville, Florida the previous fall, when Powertel began service there on October 15, 1996. It hit Chicago, Milwaukee, Austin, San Antonio, Fort Worth, Houston, Atlanta, Fresno, Spokane, Portland, Sacramento, Charlotte, and Tulsa, beginning in each city on the day digital cell phone service became available in that city.

    I learned, in 1996, that power levels do not matter. After microwave radiation had nearly killed me in Brooklyn after only six days of exposure, I was sure the radiation levels must be sky high, and I hired a professional engineer, Stuart Maurer, to go to my house with his spectrum analyzer to measure the radiation. I came down for the day from my motel room in upstate New York to watch him. To my astonishment, the highest level he measured, anywhere in my house, was 0.0001 microwatts per square centimeter. Clearly I still had a lot to learn about microwave radiation, and many things I thought I knew were wrong.

    The same thing is happening now with 5G, only this time instead of blaming an influenza virus, society is blaming a coronavirus. And this time, it is happening everywhere at once instead of one city at a time. On October 13, 2020, Verizon issued a press release announcing the availability of its 5G network throughout the United States, and on the same day Apple issued a press release announcing the launch of its 5G phone, the iPhone 12. The iPhone 12 and 12 Pro were available in stores October 23, and the iPhone Mini and Max were available in early November. And in every state except two, mortality began to suddenly rise the week of October 24 or soon after, and not later than the week of November 21. The two exceptions were Wisconsin, where the mortality spike began the week of October 17, and Hawaii, which did not have a significant rise in deaths last winter. Nationally, mortality rose an average of 25% for 20 weeks, and 300,000 people died.

    It is happening everywhere at once also to birds, insects, wildlife, and plant life. A correspondent in Knoxville, Tennessee wrote to me last week:

    “These past couple of months I've noticed 5 bumblebees now on our flowers that have appeared paralyzed to me. We unfortunately have Verizon's 5G Ultra Wideband very close to our home, which is only available outside, and I think they are being impacted by that. We brought 4 of them into our house, each at different times, and 3 of the 4 revived within about 5 minutes, so I then released them back outside. The 4th one took a little over an hour to revive before it was able to fly off.”

    Another observer, in East Dover, Vermont, wrote, a couple of days ago:

    “We grow 3 acres of blackcurrants, 200 blueberry bushes (11 varieties) and a smattering of other novelty berry plants. Our small farm is certified organic with 8 open acres certified (only 3 planted) and the remainder of the 31 acres is wooded. The blackcurrants are early bloomers and our 4 varieties all bloom within a few days of each other. There are so many different pollinating insects that come to the fields including a certain type of bumblebee with a red middle. It is wondrous to see and hear all the different shaped insects noisily working away.

    “This spring, as I walked down the rows and admired all the blossoms in the front field, I suddenly stopped because it was almost completely quiet. There were two bumblebees among the 2,225 blackcurrant bushes and their buzzing was so noticeable because everything was so silent. When I mentioned this to a fifth generation apple farmer, he said that not only were there no pollinators this year, the timing of everything was off. For example, his asparagus was two weeks early (ours was, too). Compared with 2020, our blackcurrant blooming times were 2 weeks early this year. It was a cold spring but I would think that would delay blooming. So that is another reason the insects weren’t around yet. Two weeks is a huge amount of time! The blueberries were also generally early and the usual succession of blooms through the varieties was altered.

    “The next day, I raced over to Forever Wild, a honeybee farmer, and secured a pallet of four hives. It was too cold for them to fly so they stayed in their hives in the middle of a gorgeous bloom of blackcurrants. Apparently, bumblebees will fly when it is in low 50s but honeybees need it to be at least 59 degrees. The honeybee farmer said they pollinate one quarter of the whole state (Vermont) and that all the guys up north (mostly apples) were talking about the same thing -- no pollinators and specifically no bumblebees.

    “Another curiosity this year was the fact that we had very few Japanese beetles. This could be because it was an extremely wet year but it is interesting to note that the beetles and bumblebees both winter underground. Also, when I visited my parents in September in Concord, MA, my mother pointed out how all the oaks had dark spots on them. All our tree leaves have the same spots here in southern Vermont and especially on the beech and quaking aspens. I planted our first berry plants in 2014 so I don’t have a vast wealth of personal experience owning and running a farm but I hope to continue my observations and plan on recreating that experiment with aluminum screening that Katie Haggerty did except with blackcurrants.”

    A naturalist in Greece, Diana Kordas, wrote in October from the island of Samos in the eastern Mediterranean:

    “I live in the country a few kilometers from the capital town of Samos, Vathi, which sits at the end of a large bay, and opposite the tourist village of Kokkari. In July of this summer, 2021, a pilot 5G cell tower was turned on above Kokkari. This cell tower is across the bay from us, one of its two panels points directly at us, and it is at the same height above sea level as our property. It is approximately 6 kilometers away.

    “Where we live we are surrounded by cell towers and boosters (14 total) operating at 2G, 3G, and 4G frequencies. There has been a gradual diminution of insect and bird life in the last few years, especially since 2014, when 4G came here. Many species are affected; we lost the last of the fireflies (we used to have many) two summers ago. It has been years since we had a bug splattered on the windshield of the car as we drove along. But since that 5G cell tower across the bay went live, we have lost nearly all the pollinators and a great deal more besides.

    “In the early part of the summer we had a great many pollinators: bumblebees, honeybees, many sorts of wild bees, carpenter bees, wasps of all kinds, and hoverflies. We tend to notice them as we grow all our own fruit and vegetables. Our early summer crops were pollinated without any problem, but melons, tomatoes and courgettes (zucchini) which we planted in early July have produced very little fruit as they did not get many pollinators though there were many blossoms. Not a single courgette has been pollinated and the tomatoes produced only 3 fruits; the melons (not as many as we would have expected) seem to have been pollinated by tiny night-flying moths.

    “We own three and a half acres of land, which a big property for the island. It has many large trees (pines, cypresses, carobs, wild pistachio, olives, almonds and a grove of extremely rare gum mastic trees) and some fruit trees (apricots, plums and pears) as well as fields of grasses and wild plants. I should note here that we do not use pesticides of any sort, and we do not have any adjoining neighbours who use any pesticides; also, most of the land surrounding us is wild both up the mountain and down to the sea. Our own land has never had any pesticides and I would say the same is most likely true for most of the land around us. This is NOT a pesticide problem.

    “We also keep our land as wild as possible, and except for the plots we cultivate the wild plants are allowed to grow freely: grasses, flowers (many orchids), and a lot of wild fennel. There are many bushes and hedges (I don’t know the English names for these plants). Many of the trees are over 100 years old, and some of the cypresses are over 300 years old.

    “When planting we tend to intercrop and also plant flowering basils and zinnias, which attract pollinators, among the other plants. We also put out saucers of water for them to drink from -- bees get thirsty. We usually get lots of bees, butterflies, hoverflies, wasps, etc., of many species, and we had many pollinators until recently. The decline began in July when the tower went live.

    “The bees and other pollinators, and indeed most of the insects, are now almost all gone. We know this for several reasons: one is what we see (or don’t see) on the vegetable beds, one is what we are seeing generally (or not seeing, which is hardly anything) and the most important is what we are not seeing on the carob trees. Every year at this time, the male carobs flower abundantly and draw in hundreds of pollinators: bees of all sorts, wasps, hornets and hoverflies. You can’t go anywhere near these trees without being aware of a loud buzzing, and the insects are busy on them all day. These trees bloom for about a month, they are in full flower, and to date there has been virtually nothing on them: one bumblebee, one honeybee, a few hornets, a few flies of different species, a couple of tiny wild bees. We check many times a day, every day.

    “This is NOT due to the weather, either. Since the carob trees went into flower we have had a variety of weather patterns, from strong northerly winds to fairly strong southerlies, interspersed with a good many still days. It has rained once. The temperatures are about average for the time of year. Wind or no wind, warm or cool, there are virtually no pollinators on the carobs.

    “One day we also checked for bees on every male carob we could find between here and Kokkari, and we couldn’t find any insects on any other flowering carob—or any insects at all, except a few flies.

    “The flowering carobs are a good indicator of pollinators because they attract so many. Certain plants are good for this, like traveller’s joy/cat’s claw, a thorny climbing vine which has very sweet-smelling flowers and blooms in this season (we haven’t seen any pollinators on them either) and onion flowers, which will attract every type of wasp and hornet there is (but not bees). We do not have onion flowers at this time, but on past occasions when we have had, we got large numbers of wasps and hornets, including many species we did not recognize.

    “On our land, as I write this, we have lost not only bees but all sorts of other insects: beetles of all sorts including cockchafers and ladybirds, web-spinning spiders, mantises, moths and butterflies (we always get great clouds of graylings on the pines in July-August, but hardly any this year), dragonflies of all sorts, grasshoppers and crickets. October is the season for dragonflies, and we presently have the warm, still weather when they arrive in the thousands. This year we have maybe 1/100th of the usual number. We have a few hornets (not nearly as many as usual), horseflies (fewer than usual) and flies (which seem of all the insects to be the least affected).

    “We still have mosquitoes, but I believe the reason for this is that they breed in our cistern, which has stone walls two feet thick and a cement roof -- it is protected from electromagnetic fields. The mosquitoes get in through the overflow pipe and tiny gaps in the stones that cover the drain holes. Our neighbour, who has an open-topped cistern, had thousands of mosquito larvae in the water (and a big mosquito problem) earlier in the summer, now has no mosquitoes. I checked, and there are no larvae in the water of his cistern any more.

    “I can only think that the 5G cell tower has caused these things to happen, because nothing else accounts for the sudden, severe drop in the number of insects here. The tower went live in July and the losses we are seeing have happened since July. I also think that we are seeing a drop in the number of small rodents: rats, mice and voles. We are not losing fruit and vegetables to mice or rats, which we always do. Also, on a wild bit of land like this, one tends to find traces of them, or to catch tails whisking away in the beam of a torch at night, or to hear them (tree rats can be quite noisy), and it seems they too are gone or going. My neighbour keeps finding dead rats, yet he never poisons them so they didn’t die from that.

    “We are also seeing changes in animal behaviour. We feed a number of golden jackals which are having problems hunting due to a lack of wildlife in the area. The bay of Samos is/we are already surrounded by many cell towers and boosters in addition to the new 5G cell tower and wildlife including insects and birds has been declining for years. However, over the past few weeks the number of jackals coming to us has tripled and they are exhibiting symptoms of extreme anxiety, following us around in the evenings and now starting to appear in the daytime as well (they are primarily nocturnal). These are wild animals that we do not treat as pets, but some of them are becoming positively clingy, approaching to within several feet and sitting for periods of time just a few feet away. Some of them, which were not aggressive before, have started to become very aggressive with other jackals and fights are always breaking out.

    “The area is also experiencing problems with wild boar, which are also looking for food. We have had several too-close encounters with these large and dangerous animals (which are also appearing at times when they shouldn’t, before sunset) and digging up large portions of our land at night. I was charged by one and so was my husband. Many people are seeing them in daytime, and they have dug up gardens, groves and the sides of the road. This has never happened before.

    “Bird numbers are diminishing. We have still got fairly large numbers of great tits and sardinian warblers, which tend to stick to the deep cover of thick hedges and large trees, but we have lost all the chiffchaffs and chaffinches. We have a few blackbirds but it is a long time since we have seen a songthrush, or a wren. The robins have not arrived from further north, though they should have by now. We have a pair of tawny owls but little owls have disappeared. We get jays and crows, a few ring-neck doves (diminishing) and wood-pigeons, which have become few in number lately. Gull numbers (yellow-legged gulls) are falling and the shags which were always on the beach below our land have disappeared entirely. We are getting fewer raptors -- we usually have sparrowhawks, Eleanora’s falcons, goshawks, buzzards and short-toed eagles, but they are avoiding this area now though we see them elsewhere, as well as ravens.

    “We have seen virtually no migrating birds in this area this fall: a few flycatchers, a couple of red-backed shrikes, and a flock of Little Gulls flying out to sea is all. We heard but didn’t see a flock of bee-eaters, which didn’t stop here as they usually do.

    “In conclusion, cell towers in general have diminished the number of insects and pollinators in this area, along with bird numbers and wildlife generally. The new 5G cell tower has had a devastating effect in a very short time, but it is impossible to know the full consequences until next spring at the earliest.”
    _____________

    Those of you who remember car windshields splattered with insects, gardens ablaze with butterflies and abuzz with bees, loud choruses of crickets on land, and of frogs in ponds, and thick flocks of songbirds singing their joy at life, will understand what I am about to say. Cell phones are not here to stay. Whether people will willingly give them up is another question.

    If people will willingly give up cell phones, the sudden and dramatic improvement in everyone’s health and sense of well-being, and the return of all our lost and disappearing cousin species who are still trying to share the Earth with us, will restore hope to the human species and catalyze other changes that will suddenly become possible, most importantly the ending of the mining and use of fossil fuels, which are converting the oxygen in our air to carbon dioxide, acidifying our oceans, polluting our rivers, lakes, streams and groundwater, and filling oceans, land, atmosphere, and ourselves with particles of plastic.

    If people do not willing give up cell phones, then our planet does not have long to live, and cell phones will die with the Earth. In either case, they are not here to stay. Please join me in working toward the restoration of our home. If you have not yet signed it, sign the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space. If your organization has consultation status at the United Nations and has the ability to formally submit this Appeal to the U.N., get in touch with me. If your organization opposes 5G and you have not yet done so, contact me at info@cellphonetaskforce.org about signing the amicus brief supporting our case in the Supreme Court. Please download, save, and distribute Part I, Part II and Part III of this series. If you still own or use a cell phone, please throw it away, now, and if you do not have a landline, get one."

    REFERENCES

    Anderson, John. “‘Isle of Wight Disease’ in Bees. I.” Bee World 11(4): 37-42 (1930).

    Balmori, Alfonso. “Mobile Phone Mast Effects on Common Frog (Rana temporaria) Tadpole: The City Turned into a Laboratory.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 29: 31-35 (2010).

    Bartoniček, Václav and Eliska Klimková-Deutschová. “Effect of Centimeter Waves on Human Biochemistry.” Casopis Lekařů Ceskych 103(1): 26-30 (in Czech). English Translation in G. L. Khazan, ed., Biological Effects of Microwaves, ATD Report P-65-68, September 17, 1965 (Washington, DC: Dept. of Commerce), pp. 13-14 (1964).

    Bawin, S.M. and W. Ross Adey. “Sensitivity of Calcium Binding in Cerebral Tissue to Weak Environmental Electric Fields Oscillating at Low Frequency.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 73(6): 1999-2003 (1976).

    Belokrinitskiy, Vasily S. “Hygienic Evaluation of Biological Effects of Nonionizing Microwaves.” Gigiyena i Sanitariya 1982(6): 32-34. JPRS 81865, pp. 1-5 (1982).

    Bigu del Blanco, Jaime. Interaction of Electromagnetic Fields and Living Systems with Special Reference to Birds. Laboratory Technical Report LTR-CS-113, Control Systems Laboratory, Division of Mechanical Engineering, National Research Council Canada (1973).

    Bigu del Blanco, Jaime and César Romero-Sierra. Bird Feathers as Dielectric Receptors of Microwave Radiation. Laboratory Technical Report LTR-CS-89, Control Systems Laboratory, Division of Mechanical Engineering, National Research Council Canada (1973).

    Blackman, Carl F., S.G. Benane, J.A. Elder, D.E. House, J.A. Lampe, and J.M. Faulk. “Induction of calcium-ion efflux from brain tissue by radiofrequency radiation.” Bioelectromagnetics 1:35-43 (1980).

    Blackman, Carl F. “Radiobiological approaches to electropollution.” In Biological Effects of Electropollution, S. Dutta and R. Millis, eds., Information Ventures, Phila., 1986, pp. 39-46.

    Brodeur, Paul. The Zapping of America. New York: W.W. Norton (1977).

    Clarke, Dominic, Heather Whitney, Gregory Sutton, and Daniel Robert. “Detection and Learning of Floral Electric Fields by Bumblebees.” Science 340: 66-69 (2013).

    Clarke, Dominic, Erica Morley, and Daniel Robert. “The bee, the flower, and the electric field: electric ecology and aerial electroreception.” Journal of Comparative Physiology A 203: 737-748 (2017).

    Dutta, S. et al. :Microwave radiation-induced calcium ion flux from human neuroblastoma cells: dependence on depth of amplitude modulation and exposure time.” In Biological Effects of Electropollution, S. Dutta and R. Millis, eds. Information Ventures, Phila., 1986, pp. 63-69.

    Edwards, G. S., C. C. Davis, J. D. Saffer, and M. L. Swicord. “Microwave Field-Driven Acoustic Modes in DNA.” Biophysical Journal 47: 799-807 (1985).

    Engels, Svenja, Nils-Lasse Schneider, Nele Lefeldt, Christine Maira Hein, Manuela Zapka, Andreas Michalik, Dana Elbers, Achim Kittel, P. J. Hore, and Henrik Mouritsen. “Anthropogenic Electromagnetic Noise Disrupts Magnetic Compass Orientation in a Migratory Bird.” Nature 509: 353-56 (2014).

    Fink, Hans-Werner and Christian Schönenberger. “Electrical Conduction through DNA Molecules.” Nature 398: 407-410 (1999).

    Frey, Allan H. “Auditory System Response to Radio Frequency Energy.” Aerospace Medicine 32: 1140-42 (1961).

    Frey, Allan H. “Human Auditory System Response to Modulated Electromag­netic Energy.” Journal of Applied Physiology 17(4): 689-92 (1962).

    Frey, Allan H. and Elwood Seifert. “Pulse Modulated UHF Energy Illumination of the Heart Associated with Change in Heart Rate.” Life Sciences 7 (part 2): 505-12 (1968).

    Frey, Allan H. and Rodman Messenger, Jr. “Human Perception of Illumination with Pulsed Ultrahigh-Frequency Electromagnetic Energy.” Science 181: 356-58 (1973).

    Frey, Allan H., Sondra Feld, and Barbara Frey. “Neural Function and Behavior: Defining the Relationship.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 247: 433-39 (1975).

    Frey, Allan H. “Is a Toxicology Model Appropriate as a Guide for Biological Research with Electromagnetic Fields?” Journal of Bioelectricity 9(2): 233-234 (1990).

    Gel'fon, I.A. and Sadchikova, M.N. “Protein fractions and histamine of the blood under the influence of UHF and HF.” In The Biological Action of Ultrahigh Frequencies, A.A. Letavet and Z.V. Gordon, eds., Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow. JPRS 12471, pp. 42-46 (1960).

    Glaser, Zorach R. Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation. Bethesda, MD: Naval Medical Research Institute. NTIS reports nos. AD 734391, AD 750271, AD 770621, AD 784007, AD A015622, AD A025354, and AD A029430 (1971-1976).

    Glaser, Zorach R. Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation: Ninth Supplement to Bibliography of Microwave and RF Biologic Effects. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NTIS report no. PB83176537 (1977).

    Greggers, Uwe, Gesche Koch, Viola Schmidt, et al. “Reception and Learning of Electric Fields in Bees.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280: 20130528 (2013).

    Haggerty, Katie. “Adverse Influence of Radio Frequency Background on Trembling Aspen Seedlings: Preliminary Observations.” International Journal of Forestry Research, article ID 836278 (2010).

    Hallowell, C. “Trouble in the Lily Pads.” Time, Oct. 28, 1996, p. 87.

    Hawk, Kathy. Case Study in the Heartland. Butler, PA, 1996.

    Holtze, Christian, R. Sivaramakrishnan, Markus Antonietti, J. Tsuwi, Friedrich Kremer, and Klaus D. Kramer. “The microwave absorption of emulsions containing aqueous micro- and nanodroplets: A means to optimize microwave heating.” Colloid and Interface Science 302: 651-657 (2006).

    Imms, Augustus D. “Report on a Disease of Bees in the Isle of Wight.” Journal of the Board of Agriculture 14(3): 129-40 (1907).

    Koh, K.H., C Montgomery, D Clarke, EL Morley and D Robert. “Bumble Bee Hair Motion in Electric Fields.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1322: 012001 (2019).

    Kordas, Diana. Comment to US Fish and Wildlife Service Concerning the Effects of a 5G Cell Tower on the Island of Samos. October 13, 2021.

    Kordas, Diana. “Birds and Trees of Northern Greece: Population Declines since the Advent of 4G Wireless An Observational Study.” Oct. 5, 2017, 26 pages.

    Kunjilwar, K.K. and Jitendra Behari. “Effect of amplitude-modulated RF radiation on cholinergic system of developing rats.” Brain Research 601:321-324 (1993).

    Margaritis, Lukas H., Areti K. Manta, Konstantinos D. Kokkaliaris, et al. “Drosophila Oogenesis as a Bio-marker Responding to EMF Sources.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 33(3): 165-189 (2014).

    Microwave News. “Industry Pressures FCC to Adopt ANSI RF/MW Exposure Standard.” March/April 1996, pp. 1, 11-12.

    Microwave News. “Highlights.” May/June 1995, p. 12.

    Moore, Julie L., indexer. Cumulated Index to the Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation, compiled by Zorach R. Glaser. Riverside, CA: Julie Moore & Associates (1984).

    Navakatikian, Mikhail A. and Lyudmila A. Tomashevskaya. “Phasic Behavioral and Endocrine Effects of Microwaves of Nonthermal Intensity.” In: David O. Carpenter and Sinerik Ayrapetyan, eds., Biological Effects of Electric and Magnetic Fields (New York: Academic), vol. 1, pp. 333-42 (1994).

    Nieh, James C. “The Stop Signal of Honey Bees: Reconsidering Its Message.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33(1): 51-56 (1993).

    Nikitina, Valentina N. 2001. “Hygienic, Clinical and Epidemiological Analysis of Disturbances Induced by Radio Frequency EMF Exposure in Human Body.” In Kjell Hansson Mild, Monica Sandstrom, and Eugene Lyskov, eds., Clinical and Physiological Investigations of People Highly Exposed to Electromagnetic Fields (Umeĺ, Sweden: National Institute for Working life), Arbetslivsrapport 3, pp. 32-38 (2001).

    Nittby, Henrietta, Gustav Grafström, Dong Ping Tian, Lars Malmgren, Arne Brun, Bertil R.R. Persson, Leif G. Salford, and Jacob Eberhardt. “Cognitive Impairment in Rats after Long-Term Exposure to GSM-900 Mobile Phone Radiation.” Bioelectromagnetics 29: 219-232 (2008).

    Paffhausen, Benjamin H., Julian Petrasch, Uwe Greggers, et al. “The Electronic Bee Spy: Eavesdropping on Honeybee Communication via Electrostatic Field Recordings.” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 15: 647224 (2021).

    Panagopoulos, Dimitris J. “Effect of Microwave Exposure on the Ovarian Development of Drosophila melanogaster.” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 63: 121-132 (2012).

    Panagopoulos, Dimitris J. “Analyzing the Health Impacts of Modern Telecommunications Microwaves.” In Advances in Medicine and Biology, Leon V. Berhardt, ed., Nova Science Publishers, NY, Vol. 17, pp. 1-55 (2011).

    Panagopoulos, Dimitris J., Evangelia D. Chavdoula, and Lukas H. Margaritis. “Bioeffects of Mobile Telephony Radiation in Relation to Its Intensity or Distance from the Antenna.” International Journal of Radiation Biology 86(5): 345-357 (2010).

    Panagopoulos, Dimitris J. and Lukas H. Margaritis. “Mobile Telephony Radiation Effects on Living Organisms.” In Mobile Telephones, Networks, Applications, and Performance, A.C. Harper and R.V. Buress, eds., Nova Science Publishers, NY, pp. 107-149 (2008).

    Panagopoulos, Dimitris J., Andreas Karabarbounis, and Lukas H. Margaritis. “Effect of GSM 900-MHz Mobile Phone Radiation on the Reproductive Capacity of Drosophila melanogaster.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 23(1): 29-43 (2004).

    Persson, Bertil R. R., Leif G. Salford, and Arne Brun. “Blood-brain Barrier Permeability in Rats Exposed to Electromagnetic Fields Used in Wireless Communication.” Wireless Networks 3: 455-61 (1997).

    Phillips, Ernest F. “The Status of Isle of Wight Disease in Various Countries.” Journal of Economic Entomology 18: 391-95 (1925).

    Polk, Charles. “Implications of Measured Electric Conductivity of DNA for Bio-effects of E.M. Fields.” In Bioelectromagnetics Society Annual Meeting, June 9-16, 2000, München, Germany, Abstracts book, pp. 22-23.

    Raumer, Max. “Heisse Gespräche.” ZEIT Wissen, May 2006, https://www.zeit.de/zeit-wissen/2006...omplettansicht.

    Romero-Sierra, César, Arthur O. Quanbury, and J. Alan Tanner. Feathers as Microwave and Infra-Red Filters and Detectors — Preliminary Experiments. Laboratory Technical Report LTR-CS-40, Control Systems Laboratory, Division of Mechanical Engineering, National Research Council Canada (1970).

    Sadchikova, Maria N. “Clinical manifestations of reactions to microwave irradiation in various occupational groups.” In Biologic Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Warsaw, 15-18 Oct., 1973, P. Czerski et al., eds., pp. 261-267 (1974).

    Saglioglou, Niki E., Areti K. Manta, Ioannis K. Giannarakis, Aikaterini S. Skouroliakou, and Lukas H. Margaritis. “Apopoptic Cell Death during Drosophila Oogenesis Is Differentially Increased by Electromagnetic Radiation Depending on Modulation, Intensity and Duration of Exposure.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 35(1): 40-53 (2014).

    Sagripanti, Jose-Luis and Mays L. Swicord. “DNA Structural Changes Caused by Microwave Radiation.” International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine 50(1): 47-50 (1986).

    Sagripanti, Jose-Luis, Mays L. Swicord, and C. C. Davis. “Microwave Effects on Plasmid DNA.” Radiation Research 110(2): 219-231 (1987).

    Salford, Leif G., Arne E. Brun, Jacob L. Eberhardt, Lars Malmgren, and Bertil R.R. Persson. “Nerve Cell Damage in Mammalian Brain after Exposure to Microwaves from GSM Mobile Phones.” Environmental Health Perspectives 111(7): 881-83 (2003).

    Salford, Leif G., Bertil Persson, Jacob Eberhardt, Gustav Grafström, and Lars Malmgren. “Non-thermal Effects of EMF upon the Mammalian Brain.” Abstract for a presentation made at an international conference titled The Precautionary EMF Approach: Rationale, Legislation and Implementation, Benevento, Italy, February 2006.

    Schwartz, Jean-Louis, Dennis E. House, and Geoffrey A.R. Mealing. “Exposure of Frog Hearts to CW or Amplitude-Modulated VHF Fields: Selective Efflux of Calcium Ions at 16 Hz.” Bioelectromagnetics 11: 349-358 (1990).

    Serant, Claire. “A Human Science Experiment.” New York Newsday, May 10, 2004.

    Sikorski, M. and J. Bielski. “Disturbances of glucose tolerance in workers exposed to electromagnetic radiation.” Medycyna Pracy 47(3) 227-231 (1996) (in Polish).

    Souder, William. “An Amphibian Horror Story.” New York Newsday, Oct. 15, 1996, pp. B19, B21.

    Souder, William. “Deformed Frogs Show Rift Among Scientists.” Houston Chonicle, Nov. 5, 1997, p. 4A.

    Stern, John. “Space Aliens Stealing Our Frogs.” Weekly World News, Apri 17, 1990, p. 21.

    Sutton, Gregory P., Dominic Clarke, Erica L. Morley, and Daniel Robert. “Mechanosensory hairs in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) detect weak electric fields.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(26): 7261–7265 (2016).

    Swicord, Mays L. “Chain-Length-Dependent Microwave Absorption of DNA.” Biopolymers 22: 2513-2516 (1983).

    Syngayevskaya, V. A. 1970. “Metabolic Changes.” In I. R. Petrov, ed., Influence of Microwave Radiation on the Organism of Man and Animals (Leningrad: “Meditsina”), in English translation, 1972 (Washington, DC: NASA), report no. TTF-708, pp. 48-60 (1970).

    Tanner, J. Allan. “Effects of Microwave Radiation on Birds.” Nature 210: 636 (1966).

    Tanner, J. Alan and César Romero-Sierra. “Bird Feathers as Sensory Detectors of Microwave Fields.” In: Stephen F. Cleary, ed., Biological Effects and Health Implications of Microwave Radiation. Symposium Proceedings (Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare), Publication BRH/DBE 70-2, pp. 185-87 (1970).

    Tanner, J. Alan, Jamie Bigue del Blanco, and César Romero-Sierra. Bird Feathers as Dielectric Receptors of Microwave Radiation. Laboratory Technical Report LTR-CS-89, Control Systems Laboratory, Division of Mechanical Engineering, National Research Council Canada (1973).

    Tanner, J. Alan and César Romero-Sierra. “The Effects of Chronic Exposure to Very Low Intensity Microwave Radiation on Domestic Fowl.” Journal of Bioelectricity 1(2): 195-205 (1982).

    Trovato, E. Ramona, Director, Division of Radiation and Indoor Air, Environmental Protection Agency. Letter to Federal Communications Commission (June 19, 1995).

    Underwood, Robyn M. and Dennis vanEngelsdorp. “Colony Collapse Disorder: Have We Seen This Before?” Bee Culture 35(7): 13-18 (2007).

    United States General Accounting Office. Efforts By The Environmental Protection Agency To Protect The Public From Environmental Nonionizing Radiation Exposures. CED-78-79, B-166506 (March 29, 1978).

    United States Senate, Committee on Appropriations, 104th Congress. Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Bill, Report No. 104-140 (September 5, 1995).

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Federal Radiation Protection Guidance; Proposed Alternatives for Controlling Public Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation.” Notice of Proposed Recommendations, Federal Register, Vol. 51, No. 146, pp. 27318-27339 (July 30, 1986).

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Federal Radiation Protection Guidance for Public Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation,” ARP-FRL-2245-6. Advanced Notice of Proposed Recommendation, Federal Register, Vol. 47, pp. 57338-57440 (Dec. 23, 1982).

    vanEngelsdorp, Dennis, Jay D. Evans, Claude Saegerman, Chris Mullin, Eric Haubruge, Bach Kim Nguyen, Maryann Frazier, Jim Frazier, Diana Cox-Foster, Yanping Chen, Robyn Underwood, David R. Tarpy, and Jeffery S. Pettis. “Colony Collapse Disorder: A Descriptive Study.” PLoS ONE 4(8): e6481 (2009).

    Vogt, Amanda. “Mutant Frogs Spark a Mega Mystery.” Chicago Tribune, August 4, 1998, sec. 7, p. 3.

    Warnke, Ulrich. Bees, Birds and Mankind: Destroying Nature by “Elektrosmog” (Bienen, Vögel und Menschen: Die Zerstörung der Natur durch ‚Elektrosmog'). Kompetenzinitiative, Stuttgart, Germany (German edition 2007; English edition 2009).

    Watson, Traci. “Frogs Falling Silent across USA.” USA Today, August 12, 1998, p. 3A.

    Wilson, William T. and Diana M. Menapace. “Disappearing Disease of Honey Bees: A Survey of the United States.” American Bee Journal, February, pp. 118-19; March, pp. 184-86, 217 (1979).

    Zaret, Milton M. Investigation of Personnel Hazard Associated with Radio-Frequency Fields Encountered in Naval Operations. Office of Naval Research, Contract No. N00014-69-C-0358, ONR Identification No. NR 101-765. Dept. of the Navy, Arlington, Virginia (1971).

    Zaret, Milton M. Hearings before the Committee on Commerce, United States Senate, Ninety-Third Congress, First Session on Public Law 90-602, Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968, Serial No. 93-24, pp. 100-113. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office (1973).

    Zaret, Milton M. “Cataracts Following Use of Microwave Ovens.” New York State Journal of Medicine 74(11): 2032-2048 (1974).

    Zaret, Milton M. “Selected cases of microwave cataract in man associated with concomitant annotated pathologies.” In Biologic Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Warsaw, 15-18 Oct., 1973, P. Czerski et al., eds., pp. 294-301 (1974).

    Zaret, Milton M. “Blindness, Deafness and Vestibular Dysfunction in a Microwave Worker.” The Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Monthly 54: 291 (1975).
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  32. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Alecs (1st December 2021), DaveToo (5th November 2021), hm337 (5th November 2021), jaybee (5th November 2021), Reinhard (4th December 2021), ThePythonicCow (5th November 2021)

  33. Link to Post #877
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,682
    Thanked 116,097 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Do you want your tax money used to deploy 5G?
    11/28/21
    Today's email update from: Americans for Responsible Technology <info@americansforresponsibletech.org> via gmail.mcsv.net


    "Do you want your tax money used to deploy 5G?
    Because of ONE word in the new infrastructure bill, all taxpayer-funded broadband projects must support the deployment of 5G! That needs to change!

    Section 60102 (a) (2) I (ii) (II) of the new infrastructure bill requires all new broadband projects to "support the deployment of 5G" to qualify for federal funding.
    We've uncovered an outrageous provision of the new infrastructure bill -– one that needs to be fixed, and the sooner the better.

    The intent of Congress was to help close the digital divide by providing billions of dollars for broadband projects, including both wired and wireless projects. Wired broadband is faster, cheaper, safer, more reliable, less susceptible to hacking and much more energy efficient than wireless.

    But lobbyists for the wireless industry snuck a phrase into the 1036 page bill that requires any federally-funded broadband project to support the deployment of 5G. Wait, what?

    It's a naked demonstration of telecom influence in Congress and an insult to every family in underserved communities who desperately need cost-effective broadband, not slow, expensive, unreliable, hackable, energy-guzzling wireless broadband.
    So, we need a one-word fix:

    Bad law: "...Support the deployment of 5G, successor wireless technologies, and other advanced services."

    Better law: "...Support the deployment of 5G, successor wireless technologies or other advanced services."

    There is only one way to fix this:
    Congress needs to act!

    Today, please take a minute to email your representatives in Washington and ask them to "Fix the 5G Mistake."

    And why not forward this message to a few friends?
    Sample email:

    Dear (name of legislator),

    I'm writing about one word in the infrastructure bill, HR 3684.

    As written, Sec. 60102 (a) (2) I (ii) (II) requires that all broadband projects must "support the deployment of 5G" to be eligible for federal funding. So, for instance, projects that provide low-cost wired community broadband connections can't be funded.

    I'm sure you would never knowingly support that kind of language. After all, everyone knows that wired broadband connections are faster, cheaper, safer, more reliable, less susceptible to hacking and much more energy efficient than wireless. Wired broadband is how we fix the digital divide for good!

    So we need to fix the law. The fourth word from the end of that section needs to be changed from "and" to "or."

    This simple change that would reinstate the will of Congress, help close the digital divide, and prevent billions of taxpayer dollars from becoming a windfall for the wireless industry.

    Please let me know you received this message and what action you plan to take.

    Thank you!

    Find your federal representatives
    https://myreps.datamade.us/index.html

    And while we're talking 5G.....

    Don't let any municipal official tell you that their "hands are tied" with regard to the deployment of 5G. The fact is that Congress gave local governments plenty of control over deployment, but local governments have to pro-actively take that power through smart planning provisions in their local codes.

    Please read, download and share our new Advisory Bulletin on the powers local governments have to control deployment of 5G.

    Download the new Advisory Bulletin from the ART Tool Kit
    https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/tool-kit

    This message is brought to you by Americans for Responsible Technology (ART), a non-profit coalition of grassroots organizations across the country supporting the deployment of safe, economical and future-proof wired technology. We are deeply grateful for your financial support. "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  34. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    DaveToo (28th November 2021), Reinhard (4th December 2021), wondering (29th November 2021)

  35. Link to Post #878
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    68
    Posts
    8,899
    Thanks
    9,944
    Thanked 55,067 times in 8,172 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Matt Landman talks to Freeman about many of the aspects of the current situation but from around 35 - 40 minutes into this he has some startling things to say about 5G.

    He produces Faraday bags for people to put their phones in to stop all signal activity. He first produced single layer bags. They worked for a while but eventually growing numbers of customers reported that the bags were not working any more, signals were passing through them. After collecting a lot of these reports he switched to producing double layer bags. That fixed the problem, for a while. Then he started getting reports from customers that even the double layer bags were failing.

    His hypothesis is that the signals are being ramped up in strength.

    This conversation ranges around a bit and he's a bright fella with intelligent thought tracking of his and Freeman's observations throughout the entire covid event. As worrying as some of their observations are, I felt quite relieved to listen to someone speak with such a well joined up thinking thing going on in his head, rather than slice things away into tightly isolated topics in a mental library stripping out all the dot joinability of the primary observations in the first place.

    A very worthwhile hour of podcast listening.

    https://freemantv.com/preparing-for-...-matt-landman/
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  36. Link to Post #879
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    1,790
    Thanks
    5,347
    Thanked 10,971 times in 1,706 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Quote Posted by norman (here)
    Matt Landman talks to Freeman about many of the aspects of the current situation but from around 35 - 40 minutes into this he has some startling things to say about 5G.

    He produces Faraday bags for people to put their phones in to stop all signal activity. He first produced single layer bags. They worked for a while but eventually growing numbers of customers reported that the bags were not working any more, signals were passing through them. After collecting a lot of these reports he switched to producing double layer bags. That fixed the problem, for a while. Then he started getting reports from customers that even the double layer bags were failing.

    His hypothesis is that the signals are being ramped up in strength.

    This conversation ranges around a bit and he's a bright fella with intelligent thought tracking of his and Freeman's observations throughout the entire covid event. As worrying as some of their observations are, I felt quite relieved to listen to someone speak with such a well joined up thinking thing going on in his head, rather than slice things away into tightly isolated topics in a mental library stripping out all the dot joinability of the primary observations in the first place.

    A very worthwhile hour of podcast listening.

    He's just playing into their system.
    You don't produce Faraday bags for your phones.
    You stop using them (phones) period!
    And stop getting jabbed!

    No phones (and no one getting jabbed) no one to control, no use for 5G towers.

  37. The Following User Says Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    Ernie Nemeth (4th December 2021)

  38. Link to Post #880
    Avalon Member Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th March 2012
    Posts
    301
    Thanks
    4,587
    Thanked 1,813 times in 292 posts

    Default Re: Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

    Quote Posted by Lariliss (here)
    Dears,
    We are exposed to EMF for generations.
    1. Telecommunication:
    has very strict EMF control, installed even outdoors so that it is not affecting the human body. Indoors regulations sometimes are so high, that it is hard to get the coverage with indoor antennas. 2G/3G/4G/5G, the same, if we have all of them on the site, they are summed. The higher ‘G’ the less is transmitter power.
    next generation step means more effective spectrum usage; 5G is the same Hertz as Wi-Fi, but technically, it has better performance for moving objects, better latency and it is telecom;
    a microwave oven is in the same spectrum and is more dangerous near to you making dinner hot.
    2. Wi-Fi is already mentioned, it is all around indoors competing telecom for data users.
    3. Industry. Mining is going deeper and getting more dangerous, breaking the boarders of human safety regulations. We send 250 ton vehicles, carrying 250 of ore more on itself without, fully autonomous without any humans to be in danger. Thanks to 5G technology.

    All the wireless coverage providers go through the path of regulations and restrictions before making a new roll out and they have to pass the checks.
    5G transmitters will reuse 4G sites and even make the EMF less with more efficient technology replacement.

    It is the responsibility of every one habits, life style and comfort zones.
    Nice to sit in a warm house watching the cold outside and sending messages, using wi-fi, while my 4G mobile gets calls and my bath gets warm.

    Hi Larliss,

    Have you read "The Invisible Rainbow" by Arthur Firstenberg? It refutes your assertions referencing detailed scientific studies, footnotes and a comprehensive bibliography. If you can't find it online PM me.

    Here is a recent paper you may find interesting;

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/

    Very strict EMF safety control? Please feel free to cite any studies or research papers looking into non-ionizing WCR (wireless communications radiation) effects on biology,
    showing that it is safe. The paper linked above references decades of peer reviewed science papers showing that it is quite the opposite.


    The short video below addresses this point rather succinctly;

    Last edited by Shadowman; 6th December 2021 at 22:28.
    Minimum Awareness, Maximum Problems
    Maximum Awareness, Minimum Problems
    Total Awareness, No Problems!

  39. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Shadowman For This Post:

    DaveToo (5th December 2021), Ernie Nemeth (5th December 2021)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 44 of 53 FirstFirst 1 34 44 53 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts