-
11th July 2018 15:50
Link to Post #21
Re: Problems with Mark Richards' SSP testimony to Kerry Cassidy
A snip from the above SkyMatters link I have provided states, in part:
ELLIS RICHARDS, SR. / BERT SPARKS TAYLOR
..."We are first introduced to Mark’s grandfather, Ellis Richards, Sr. The 2009 conference notes state:
Ellis Loyd Richards, Sr., was a brilliant electronics engineer, and authored books on the subject. He worked with Tesla and on the Manhattan Project and the Philadelphia Experiment. He was a superintendent of Coyne Electrical Institute. He was also a leading expert in the early push for space flight. He worked at several think-tanks that conducted ‘underground’ research for the US. He invented the Richards Anti-Matter (RAM) Drive in the late '30s.
The 1930 Census Records document that Mr. Richards was a school superintendent and other material establishes that he worked at Coyne Electrical Institute (now called Coyne College). The college specializes in practical training in electrical systems. Today it offers programs in electrical systems and electrical construction and maintenance, as it appears to have done when Mr. Richards was there.
Mr. Richards wrote Diesel Engines and Diesel Electric Power, "a complete practical book of instruction on diesel engines, their construction, principles, operation, care and adjustment." (Chicago, F.J. Drake & Co., 1939.) No other title is listed in the world catalog of libraries (Melvyl). The cover page is shown on google books - although difficult to read it appears that his affiliations included the Electrical Association.
The public record indicates that Richards’s work was directed toward practical applications. He obtained no patents. I have not found any records showing that he was a leading expert on space flight or worked with Tesla. It might be said that if he was inventing anti-matter drives, then his work would have been kept secret, but much of the work of Tesla and other researchers is well known. Thomas Townsend Brown's research on anti-gravity, for instance, was very public and he obtained a number of patents. In contrast, the EDH claims about Mr. Richards stand alone..."
-
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Bayareamom For This Post:
anandacate (13th July 2018), aoibhghaire (11th July 2018), Bill Ryan (11th July 2018), Bright Skies (3rd October 2018), Debra (11th July 2018), DNA (12th July 2018), Foxie Loxie (11th July 2018), geofffxdwg (11th July 2018), Innocent Warrior (15th October 2018), Jantje (13th July 2018), lisinskib (29th October 2018), mountain_jim (12th July 2018), Nasu (12th September 2018), Tintin (13th July 2018), toppy (27th October 2018), WhiteFeather (14th September 2018)
-
11th July 2018 15:58
Link to Post #22
Re: Problems with Mark Richards' SSP testimony to Kerry Cassidy
One more snip (very interesting):
..."The length of the deliberations in the Richards case indicates that the verdict was a close one. Yet, there was little question that Mark was involved with the crime – the only issue at trial was whether he was the mastermind or an accessory who tried to cover up the crime. There is a substantial difference between the two in legal terms, but neither one squares with Mark's claim of having been a high level operative – the type of character, skills, knowledge, and connections that the latter would possess is at odds with the events surrounding the Baldwin murder. At the very least, his defense at the time is not consistent with the current claim that he had nothing to do with the crime.
During the time frame that includes Mark's "most intense" covert activity, the public record indicates that he lived a relatively normal life. He attended college in 1976, got married a few years later, and worked to establish a business – although his writings and his hopes for a school of future studies suggests a number of interests with an imaginative streak.
The newspapers at the time were very interested in learning about Richards and investigating his background. There was apparently no suggestion that he had lived a double life or that there had been unexplained absences. Some might say that since Mark was deep into secret covert operations, his story remained hidden, yet there are things that now could be documented. For instance, Jo Ann Richards states that Mark has several degrees in history, science, and quantum physics. (Cassidy Interview, 2012.) That could easily be substantiated.
If Richards joined the army after high school, served as a lieutenant in Viet Nam and an officer in the Navy, that is a matter of record that might have been used at trial or could be documented now. I have not been able to find any veterans records substantiating his claim.
Jo Ann Richards states that both Mark and Ellis Richards were part of the USAF Space Command. (Cassidy Interview, 2012; EDH Dulce Report.) The Command was not activated until 1982, after the events in question. She states that Richards was convicted even though he was somewhere else at the time of the crime, yet that alibi was not presented at trial. Did Mark allege in the state post-conviction proceedings that there was any other evidence?..."
-
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Bayareamom For This Post:
anandacate (13th July 2018), aoibhghaire (11th July 2018), Bill Ryan (11th July 2018), Bright Skies (3rd October 2018), Debra (11th July 2018), DNA (12th July 2018), Foxie Loxie (11th July 2018), geofffxdwg (11th July 2018), Innocent Warrior (15th October 2018), Jantje (13th July 2018), lisinskib (29th October 2018), Nasu (12th September 2018), Tintin (13th July 2018), WhiteFeather (14th September 2018)
-
11th July 2018 16:08
Link to Post #23
Re: Problems with Mark Richards' SSP testimony to Kerry Cassidy
From the Legal Studies Forum:
http://web.archive.org/web/200512180...incamelot.html
The SkyMatters website states the above written piece may be THE most complete coverage of the murder trial ever written.
-
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Bayareamom For This Post:
anandacate (13th July 2018), aoibhghaire (11th July 2018), Bill Ryan (11th July 2018), Bright Skies (3rd October 2018), Debra (11th July 2018), DNA (12th July 2018), Foxie Loxie (11th July 2018), geofffxdwg (11th July 2018), Innocent Warrior (15th October 2018), Ivanhoe (11th July 2018), Jantje (13th July 2018), lisinskib (29th October 2018), Nasu (12th September 2018), Tintin (13th July 2018), WhiteFeather (14th September 2018)
-
11th July 2018 16:14
Link to Post #24
Re: Problems with Mark Richards' SSP testimony to Kerry Cassidy
One more write up from Murderpedia (excellent) re the Mark Richards case:
http://murderpedia.org/male.H/h/hoov...ssan-david.htm
-
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Bayareamom For This Post:
anandacate (13th July 2018), aoibhghaire (11th July 2018), Bill Ryan (11th July 2018), Bright Skies (3rd October 2018), Debra (11th July 2018), DNA (12th July 2018), Foxie Loxie (11th July 2018), geofffxdwg (11th July 2018), Innocent Warrior (15th October 2018), Jantje (13th July 2018), Nasu (12th September 2018), Tintin (13th July 2018), WhiteFeather (14th September 2018)
-
11th July 2018 16:32
Link to Post #25
Re: Problems with Mark Richards' SSP testimony to Kerry Cassidy
Snip (last one) from Murderpedia website:
..."Mark Richards was also interviewed by the police shortly after the arrest. He denied any involvement in the murder of his good friend Baldwin and offered an account of his whereabouts on July 6 that did not ring true. The two boys arrested with him were his employees, he told Sheriffs Sergeant Richard Keaton, and then startled his questioner by adding: "The poor kids -- I mean, I should take the fall for this, not them. OK? You know, like if somebody is trying to go down [take the blame] for anything."
Keaton asked, "Why should you take a fall?"
"Well, you know." answered Richards, sinking further into the morass of his own words and uncertain whether it was better to incriminate the boys or to defend them, "I understand what it must look like. OK? And all I'm saying is these are kids. You know, they don't have -- they wouldn't have had anything to do with anything like this. Dick didn't owe them any money or anything like that."
After waiting patiently for the strange monologue to run its course, Keaton confronted Richards with evidence that he had used Baldwin's credit-cards and burglarized his home. Richards admitted both allegations, explaining that the car-dealer owed him money; he had used the credit-cards with Baldwin's approval in reduction of the debt. He could not plead the dead man's consent to the burglary, but apparently hoped that the detective would regard the break-in as a frustrated creditor's last resort. Still, once it was clear to him that he could not deny possession of some of the fruits of the crime, Richards backed away from his earlier "protective" attitude towards his young employees; he told Keaton that Crossie Hoover had confessed to him the murder of Baldwin.
These first statements taken from the suspects might have indicated that the killer or killers of the classic-car dealer had acted from routine theft motives. However, a police inspection of Mark Richards's house added a whole new dimension to the case. On July 22 the Marin Independent Journal reported the results of the search under a towering headline, "BIZARRE PLOT FOR MARIN COUP?"
One has to ask, why on earth Richards, if he was 'off planet' during this crime, would have had possession of the victim's credit cards? HE USED THEM and fully owns up to this during his questioning!
I would beg anyone who views Mark Richards as some sort of secret space war hero to PLEASE review the court records and any and all testimony during the trial and ask yourself if you, then, really truly believe this man is anything more than a sociopath.
He was NOT off planet at the time of this murder. HE. WAS.THERE. Mark Richards planned Richard A. Baldwin's murder. Richards was deeply in debt, as the California state forensics detective testified, during the trial. This detective (you can find his name and what he stated in the court documents)...he stated that financial records of Mark Richards were obtained by police detectives which showed absolutely the dire straits of Richards' finances at the time of this murder.
In my opinion, after reading thoroughly ALL of the documents provided by the SkyMatters website, Mark Richards is a true sociopath. He is a monster. ANYONE who would believe Richards' preposterous story...is being played.
There are REAL people who have lost their lives and/or have had their lives and the lives of their family members ruined beyond measure because of various elements involved with this entire alien/human issue. It is appalling to see someone such as this Mark Richards fellow be propped up on some sort of pedestal as a hero when nothing, nothing, nothing could be further from the truth.
I can almost guarantee that those of whom truly are involved in a deep manner with black ops issues regarding this phenomenon are NOT talking to the public.
There is an interview of a former Brigadier General who gives testimony about this government coverup re the alien/human issue (Greer interviewed him). Cannot remember his name -- but you can find it under the Sirius channel at YouTube. No matter what one may think about Greer, he does interview some decent, TRUTHFUL individuals (William Pawelek for one).
There is so much hogwash melded in with truth regarding this phenomenon that it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff. But again, I would implore anyone who may have heard about the Mark Richards tale to use your discernment (and common sense) when reviewing the materials proffered on this thread.
It sickens me to no end that anyone would prop this man up as some sort of hero.
Mark Richards is right where he should be - IN PRISON. I feel for Richard A. Baldwin's family having to witness the story telling regarding the man who conspired to murder a beloved family member. They don't deserve this. THEY are the victims here, NOT Mark Richards.
Last edited by Bayareamom; 11th July 2018 at 18:49.
-
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Bayareamom For This Post:
anandacate (13th July 2018), aoibhghaire (12th July 2018), Bill Ryan (11th July 2018), Bright Skies (3rd October 2018), Debra (11th July 2018), DNA (12th July 2018), Foxie Loxie (11th July 2018), geofffxdwg (11th July 2018), HaveBlue (26th November 2018), Hervé (11th July 2018), ichingcarpenter (3rd October 2018), Innocent Warrior (15th October 2018), Ivanhoe (11th July 2018), Jantje (13th July 2018), Justplain (13th July 2018), Kryztian (11th January 2019), lisinskib (29th October 2018), Nasu (12th September 2018), Tintin (13th July 2018), WhiteFeather (14th September 2018)
-
11th July 2018 17:29
Link to Post #26