Bill Ryan's personal Question-and-Answer thread. Pile it on. :)

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Kryztian (here)
Bill, imagine this situation if you will:

An Avalon member contributes numerous helpful and valued posts on the forum. However, the nation they live in has draconian freedom of speech laws and their posts get them in trouble with the government and they could face time in prison or other forms of punishment because of their posts. Would you, in such a situation, allow them to remove their posts from the forum if they choose to comply with their government's oppressive laws?

That's a good question, Kryztian. I'd suggest change the name or label all posts as "guest" rather than delete them.

[holcaul]

Bill, who do you think is behind James O'Keefe (from "Project Veritas"), Sen. Rand Paul, and Joe Rogan (I am still shocked that he brought Dr. Robert Malone for an interview). Who is protecting them, are these the, what you and Kerry used to call, white hats operating behind the scenes fighting the globalist psychopaths?

Or are Schwab & Co. realizing they are losing and just trying to mitigate the aftermath?

Your thoughts on the subject are very much appreciated!

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Kryztian (here)
Bill, imagine this situation if you will:

An Avalon member contributes numerous helpful and valued posts on the forum. However, the nation they live in has draconian freedom of speech laws and their posts get them in trouble with the government and they could face time in prison or other forms of punishment because of their posts. Would you, in such a situation, allow them to remove their posts from the forum if they choose to comply with their government's oppressive laws?

An update here. Many members know (or can see) that Constance has self-deleted a large number of her posts, about 1000 of them.

(Members can't actually totally remove their posts, though mods can easily do that on request. But they can always manually edit their content so that almost nothing shows any more.)

What we greatly wish is that she'd contacted us first. Then we could have simply one-click deleted them all in such a way that they could have been one-click restored any time later. But her painstaking manual editing of each one means that to restore them (if ever!), they'd have to be even more painstakingly manually re-edited, an even more gargantuan task.

We've asked her about this, and she says she prefers to keep them deleted right now for her personal security reasons. So at the moment, that's where things seem to stand.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by holcaul (here)
Bill, who do you think is behind James O'Keefe (from "Project Veritas"), Sen. Rand Paul, and Joe Rogan (I am still shocked that he brought Dr. Robert Malone for an interview). Who is protecting them, are these the, what you and Kerry used to call, white hats operating behind the scenes fighting the globalist psychopaths?

Or are Schwab & Co. realizing they are losing and just trying to mitigate the aftermath?

Your thoughts on the subject are very much appreciated!

I have no strong idea. But Clif High's notion of a loosely connected 'white hat' SOC (Self-Organizing Collective) does come to mind.

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
An update here. Many members know (or can see) that Constance has self-deleted a large number of her posts, about 1000 of them.

(Members can't actually totally remove their posts, though mods can easily do that on request. But they can always manually edit their content so that almost nothing shows any more.)

What we greatly wish is that she'd contacted us first. Then we could have simply one-click deleted them all in such a way that they could have been one-click restored any time later. But her painstaking manual editing of each one means that to restore them (if ever!), they'd have to be even more painstakingly manually re-edited, an even more gargantuan task.

We've asked her about this, and she says she prefers to keep them deleted right now for her personal security reasons. So at the moment, that's where things seem to stand.

I happened to notice in just the last week that some of Constance posts were modified by way of adding “FFFFFFF” and coloring the fonts white. (IIRC)

…but 1,000…Wow! that says a lot without the words that we, at times, get caught up in.

Constance, you’re but a thought away. I skip over the words and go straight to heart-to-heart connection.
So no good-byes, only blessings to You and Son.

♡

[mountain_jim]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by holcaul (here)
Bill, who do you think is behind James O'Keefe (from "Project Veritas"), Sen. Rand Paul, and Joe Rogan (I am still shocked that he brought Dr. Robert Malone for an interview). Who is protecting them, are these the, what you and Kerry used to call, white hats operating behind the scenes fighting the globalist psychopaths?

Or are Schwab & Co. realizing they are losing and just trying to mitigate the aftermath?

Your thoughts on the subject are very much appreciated!

I have no strong idea. But Clif High's notion of a loosely connected 'white hat' SOC (Self-Organizing Collective) does come to mind.

Except that Cliff said in an interview last week that he would not call them 'white hats' because their motives were not necessarily 'pure', as I recall.

But if they were motivated by what happened in the USA to JFK and since, I have no problem with calling this supposed group 'white hats'

[holcaul]

Please share your thoughts on this, Bill

I have been reading the Torbitt Document recently and Gordon Novel is mentioned there multiple times as well as his role in the Kennedy Assassination as well as his connections to the CIA and their heavy involvement in the JFK assassination and most importantly the cover-up that goes on till this day.

I decided to revisit the interview you and Kerry did with Novel back in 2006. Although he does talk about many interesting things that are corroborated by other sources (such as the Nazis (Gehlen Org), the Illuminati, MJ12 the global elites, etc.), BUT he puts his own spin on things. He says that the CIA are the good guys and have always been, that they have no hand in JFK assassination or many other things they have been accused of. That he has never been part of the organization. He accuses Jim Garrison of fabricating evidence. And so on.

He mentions a lot of interesting and truthful things, or at least they sound true but he ignores and twists a few very critical details. Isn't it the definition of masterfully constructed disinformation?

Also, his background is very shady. Especially his origins.

And all this talk of giving free energy to the people of the world that never amounts to anything. This specific talking point sounds very familiar (Steven Greer comes to mind [another unbelievably shady character]).

I know that Novel and his legacy are praised in the alternative community. He is celebrated as this truth warrior. But to he just doesn't feel right. He feels like CIA operative and disinfo agent to me.

What are your thoughts on this deep state character? Have they changed in the past 15 years?


PS
Thanks again for all those amazing interviews you did with Kerry 15 years ago. You were true pioneers. This body of work is for the ages. I honestly consider the old Project Camelot stuff your best work!

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by holcaul (here)
Please share your thoughts on this, Bill

I have been reading the Torbitt Document recently and Gordon Novel is mentioned there multiple times as well as his role in the Kennedy Assassination as well as his connections to the CIA and their heavy involvement in the JFK assassination and most importantly the cover-up that goes on till this day.

I decided to revisit the interview you and Kerry did with Novel back in 2006. Although he does talk about many interesting things that are corroborated by other sources (such as the Nazis (Gehlen Org), the Illuminati, MJ12 the global elites, etc.), BUT he puts his own spin on things. He says that the CIA are the good guys and have always been, that they have no hand in JFK assassination or many other things they have been accused of. That he has never been part of the organization. He accuses Jim Garrison of fabricating evidence. And so on.

He mentions a lot of interesting and truthful things, or at least they sound true but he ignores and twists a few very critical details. Isn't it the definition of masterfully constructed disinformation?

Also, his background is very shady. Especially his origins.

And all this talk of giving free energy to the people of the world that never amounts to anything. This specific talking point sounds very familiar (Steven Greer comes to mind [another unbelievably shady character]).

I know that Novel and his legacy are praised in the alternative community. He is celebrated as this truth warrior. But to he just doesn't feel right. He feels like CIA operative and disinfo agent to me.

What are your thoughts on this deep state character? Have they changed in the past 15 years?


PS
Thanks again for all those amazing interviews you did with Kerry 15 years ago. You were true pioneers. This body of work is for the ages. I honestly consider the old Project Camelot stuff your best work!

All I can say about this is that we never really knew. If he ever was a "disinfo agent", as best we were aware he never tried to take advantage of his friendship with us to influence us in any way. (Kerry persuaded him to do the Camelot interview, for instance, not the other way round.)

He was a kind of lovable rogue — which I think his interview presents quite well. Kerry in particular could always twist him round her little finger‚ which also comes over very clearly in the video.

[sunwings]

Which Camelot witness would you most like to interview about the Russia and Ukraine war?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by sunwings (here)
Which Camelot witness would you most like to interview about the Russia and Ukraine war?

Ha. What a great question.

Several come to mind — a few of whom aren't usually remembered as the highest-profile people we interviewed. But I think something to glue people to their seats would be a round-table conversation between Wade Frazier, Joseph Farrell, and Richard Dolan.

[Violet3]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by sunwings (here)
Which Camelot witness would you most like to interview about the Russia and Ukraine war?

Ha. What a great question.

Several come to mind — a few of whom aren't usually remembered as the highest-profile people we interviewed. But I think something to glue people to their seats would be a round-table conversation between Wade Frazier, Joseph Farrell, and Richard Dolan.

Heck yes, great idea especially if you are the interviewer Bill. I am a member of Giza so could email Joseph Farrell to see if he would be interested. Do you know to contact Richard Dolan Bill? Wade is on Avalon of course so not hard to contact him. You up for it Bill?

[Kryztian]

Bill, Just wondering if you ever climbed "Chimborazo" in Ecuador, or have plans to. It is Ecuador's highest mountain, and in one sense, it is the "highest mountain on Earth", that is, if you measure from the center of the Earth. If you measure from sea level, then that would be Mt. Everest.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Kryztian (here)
Bill, Just wondering if you ever climbed "Chimborazo" in Ecuador, or have plans to. It is Ecuador's highest mountain, and in one sense, it is the "highest mountain on Earth", that is, if you measure from the center of the Earth. If you measure from sea level, then that would be Mt. Everest.

Ha. Great question. Yes, I've thought of it, of course. I'm sure it'd be very possible.

But it's not all that straightforward. Although one might be able to sneak up there on one's own, one's supposed to hire a local guide. And that may not be a bad idea, if one doesn't know the mountain personally.

In October last year (2021), 6 climbers were killed in an avalanche while ascending the regular route, while 30 years ago 10 climbers were killed in pretty much the same spot. So it has its dangers, even for guided climbers who are supposed to know what they're doing.

Because of the avalanche risk (at its greatest when the snow is soft and wet, when the sun is on it), it's safest to climb the very last section in the middle of the night. Temperatures then would be way below freezing (a good thing!), but that means special equipment and clothing is needed. I used to have all that stuff, but not any more. So I'd have to either buy it (expensive here), or rent it, although I'd be sure that's possible.

A funny story. A couple years ago, I wrote to a local guide about this, an American expat climber named John. I thought that'd be a smart first move. What I had in mind was a Chimborazo ascent with Mara (my dog), which would almost certainly be the world record highest doggie ascent anywhere in North or South America. (In the Himalayas, a stray dog followed a climbing team all the way to the top of 23,497 ft high Baruntse, a ridiculous feat. I posted about that here. )

John was full of enthusiasm for my inquiry, and told me all about the mountain and how it'd best be climbed. I then told him about my ambition for Mara's record attempt... at which point he never replied.

[wondering]

well, dog gone....🙁

[mizo]

Hi Bill. I would like to ask about the Project Avalon Forum, have you thought about it being more than an online group or collective- internet-hive- community? The reason I ask this question is I've had some disturbing dreams over the last few nights that this forum becomes a behemoth or entity of sorts with a somewhat nefarious self -awareness, in my dream it sprouts tentacles to grab hold of me; then we have a war of words (seemingly words of power) in my dreams these words as I understand have great importance, but unfortunately I cannot remember their meaning when I wake up disturbed and in a cold sweat.

I know a dream can be just a 'dream' or too many cheese sandwiches before bedtime!

Apologies if it seems a daft question just would like your thoughts.

[Losus4]

Hi Bill, do you still speak to Kerry, and do you look back on any of your Project Camelot interviewees certain that they were delusional and/or fantasists?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by mizo (here)
Hi Bill. I would like to ask about the Project Avalon Forum, have you thought about it being more than an online group or collective- internet-hive- community? The reason I ask this question is I've had some disturbing dreams over the last few nights that this forum becomes a behemoth or entity of sorts with a somewhat nefarious self -awareness, in my dream it sprouts tentacles to grab hold of me; then we have a war of words (seemingly words of power) in my dreams these words as I understand have great importance, but unfortunately I cannot remember their meaning when I wake up disturbed and in a cold sweat.

I know a dream can be just a 'dream' or too many cheese sandwiches before bedtime!

Apologies if it seems a daft question just would like your thoughts.

Thanks for the interesting idea! But I have to say that the notion of the forum becoming self-aware (like Skynet!) seems just a little unlikely. But you could maybe start a members-only thread to ask if anyone else has had any similar experiences?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Losus4 (here)
Hi Bill, do you still speak to Kerry, and do you look back on any of your Project Camelot interviewees certain that they were delusional and/or fantasists?

Yes, I exchanged emails with with Kerry just yesterday, and she said that she was "doing great!" — the exclamation mark was hers.

Regarding my current view on the early Camelot interviews, the biggest mistake we made was with Pete Peterson. (Do see this Avalon thread: The Truth about 'Pete' Peterson, David Wilcock, the foreclosure, the dead cats, and GoFundMe.)

But this post might be interesting, on the thread titled Discussion on the reliability of alternative media sources and personas. Slightly reformatted, this is what I wrote:

~~~

From the time I was involved with Camelot (2006-12010), I've marked in red the interviews or videos I personally think can be disregarded. All the others are good, and a few are pretty important.

• The Anglo-Saxon Mission - Bill Ryan
• Aaron McCollum
• Bill Ryan interviewed by Freedom Central
• Klaus Dona
• Dane Tops
• Gabriele Stähler on Vitamin D3
• Camelot live in Amsterdam
• Camelot Conference in LA - Cynthia Crawford
• Camelot Conference in LA - Dr Alfred Webre
• Camelot Conference in LA - Marcia Schafer
• Camelot Conference in LA - Miriam Delicado
• Jordan Maxwell
• Dr Paul LaViolette
• Patrick Geryl
• Camelot Conference in LA - David Wilcock
• Camelot Conference in LA - Bob Dean
• Camelot Conference in LA - Richard Dolan
• Camelot Conference in LA - Duncan O'Finioan
• Camelot Conference in LA - Jordan Maxwell
• Camelot Conference in LA - Alex Collier
• Jane Bürgermeister
• Futuretalk 5: Bob Dean, Henry Deacon, Alfred Webre
• Dr Pete Peterson Part 1
• Dr Pete Peterson Part 2
• Dr Pete Peterson Part 3
• Miriam Delicado - a Message
• Dr Len Horowitz
• Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy
• Zurich Conference - Dan Burisch/Marci McDowell
• Zurich Conference - Brian O'Leary/Henry Deacon
• Zurich Conference - Bill Ryan
• Barcelona Conference Panel Discussion Part 1
• Barcelona Conference Panel Discussion Part 2
• Dr Steven Greer
• Rafael Palacios interviews Henry Deacon
• Bob Dean at the Exopolitics Summit, Barcelona
• Bob Dean at the Press Conference, Barcelona
• Erich von Däniken
• Henry Deacon at the Zurich Conference
• Joseph Farrell
• Wade Frazier
• Elizabeth Nelson - Flight 93
• Jim Marrs
• David Icke
• Camelot Live at Vilcabamba
• Peter Levenda
• Brian O'Leary
• Ricardo Silva
• Jane Burgermeister
• Jim Humble
• Jessica: Crystal Child
• Valery Uvarov Part 1
• Valery Uvarov Part 2
• Marcia Schafer
• James of WingMakers
• Dr Bill Deagle Part 1
• Dr Bill Deagle Part 2
• Dr Bill Deagle Part 3
• Bob Dean: The Coming of Nibiru
• The Mitchell-Hedges Crystal Skull
• Miriam Delicado
• Henry Deacon (Futuretalk 3)
• Jim Sparks and Bill Holden
• John Lear Tells All Part 1
• John Lear Tells All Part 2
• John Lear Tells All Part 3
• John Lear Tells All Part 4
• George Green Part 1
• George Green Part 2
• David Wilcock (Futuretalk 1)
• Leo Zagami Part 1
• Leo Zagami Part 2
• Leo Zagami Part 3
• Luca Scantamburlo Part 1
• Luca Scantamburlo Part 2
• Benjamin Fulford Part 1
• Benjamin Fulford Part 2
• Benjamin Fulford Part 3
• Boriska
• Richard Hoagland Part 1
• Richard Hoagland Part 2
• Richard Hoagland Part 3
• David Wilcock (Jumproom to Mars)
• Dan Sherman
• Bob Dean Part 1
• Bob Dean Part 2
• Bob Dean Part 3 (with Marcia Schafer)
• Bill Holden
• Jim Sparks
• Dan Burisch (Stargate Secrets) Part 1
• Dan Burisch (Stargate Secrets) Part 2
• David Wilcock Part 1
• David Wilcock Part 2
• David Wilcock Part 3
• David Wilcock Part 4
• Duncan O'Finioan and David Corso
• Sgt. Clifford Stone
• Gordon Novel
• Michael St. Clair
• Michael St. Clair -- Futuretalk Part 1
• Michael St. Clair --Futuretalk Part 2
• Duncan O'Finioan
• Ralph Ring
• Henry Deacon
• John Lear
• Dan Burisch Part 1
• Dan Burisch Part 2
• Dan Burisch Part 3
• Gary McKinnon
• Bill Hamilton
• 'Mr. X', ET archivist

[Dumpster Diver]

Hey Bill, what do you make of Kerry’s interviews with Kimberly Goguen? Also, any thoughts you might have on KG?

Thanks for this opportunity, excellent thread.

[DNA]

Is Kerry Cassidy dangerous?

Last night I listened to two interviews which amounted to over three hours.
Kerry keeps stating that the vaccine is graphene which atomically speaking is the strongest substance in the world right now.
She says that the reason for the vaccine is that the elite are transforming the population into super soldiers with graphene enhanced skeletal and muscular features.
It won't take in some folks and they'll die but they are considered acceptable casualties by the elite. As the super soldiers will be needed to fight the aliens. WTF?

Does Kerry actually believe this?
She sounds like she does.
Or is she just being sensational for clicks?

I was under the impression that the vaccine was a death sentence and if you survived the initial blood clot attack and the development of autoimmuno compromised disease then the purpose of the graphene was to slice away at you over time with one atom thick fifty atoms long mini razor blades destined to get you if the other methods failed for some reason.

Her interview felt like she was espousing flat earth equivalent disinformation.
https://rumble.com/vw4ymc-kerry-cass...carmine-2.html