+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 4
Results 61 to 69 of 69

Thread: Agenda 21, The Disastrous Flop of "Green" Energy and the "Green New Deal"

  1. Link to Post #61
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,973 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, The Disastrous Flop of "Green" Energy and the "Green New Deal"

    Louisiana Leads 10-State Lawsuit Against Biden’s Climate Order
    BY ZACHARY STIEBER
    April 23, 2021
    https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_br...BvvI7xHxhCA%3D

    "Ten states are suing President Joe Biden for his executive order directing all federal agencies to commence work on what he describes as “the climate crisis.”

    Biden on his first day in office signed the order, which says the federal government “must advance environmental justice” and, among other efforts, “reduce greenhouse gas emissions” and “bolster resilience to the impacts of climate change.”The Democrat on Thursday unveiled a new phase of his climate agenda, vowing that the United States will cut greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030.

    Biden’s order could destroy a range of industries if left unchallenged, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry warned as he led the filing of the multistate lawsuit in federal court in his state.

    “Joe Biden’s executive order should alarm every American. If left unchecked, the President could use this destructive cost structure to justify almost anything,” he said in a statement. “Louisiana produces crucial natural and manmade resources for our nation and enjoys a rich, storied way of life. From timber and food stocks to oil and natural gas, chemical and industrial products to recreational sportsmanship and outdoor activities—nearly every aspect of our economy and culture is at risk under this unconscionable policy.”

    Biden’s order also forces federal agencies to estimate the emissions of three greenhouse gases, known as SC-GHG Estimates, the 57-page suit states.

    Because the gases are ubiquitous, the estimates could be relevant to the cost/benefit analysis for every federal rule and a host of other actions, covering topics from dishwaters to vending machines.

    “In other words, federal agencies must now use the SC-GHG Estimates to calculate regulatory costs and benefits for virtually everything that States and their citizens encounter every day. That means federal agencies will use the SC-GHG Estimates to assign massive— even existential—costs to every regulatory action and ‘other relevant action,’ thereby fundamentally transforming the way States conduct business and Americans live. It’s no exaggeration to say the SC-GHG Estimates are the most expansive, and potentially most expensive, federal regulatory initiative in history,” the attorneys general warned in the lawsuit.

    Use of the estimates during the Obama administration did not follow procedures required by federal law and neither does the Biden administration’s use of them, they added.

    The Biden administration did not respond to a request for comment.

    Plaintiffs are asking the court to order federal agencies not to use the estimates and declare that the estimates are contrary to law and “arbitrary and capricious.”

    Attorneys general of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, Texas, West Virginia, and Wyoming joined the suit, along with South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem. All are Republicans.

    In a separate action in Congress, Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) said they would attempt to force a vote on legislation that would reverse Biden’s Jan. 20 executive order and other similar mandates.

    “The Biden Administration is willing to sacrifice millions of oil and gas jobs, hike up energy costs, and destroy our energy independence all to appease Green-New-Deal-loving radicals,” Roy said in a statement. “It’s time that Congress put a stop to his unilateral economic destruction and put the American people first. After all House Republicans have signed on to this effort, I look forward to seeing how many of my Democratic colleagues are willing to protect American jobs and energy security.” "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd June 2021), Constance (24th April 2021), ExomatrixTV (16th July 2022), Gwin Ru (22nd June 2021)

  3. Link to Post #62
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,973 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, The Disastrous Flop of "Green" Energy and the "Green New Deal"

    Joe Biden's stupidity is now a threat to the West': Bolt
    370,637 views•Apr 26, 2021
    Sky News Australia
    1.48M subscribers

    "Sky News host Andrew Bolt says the “stupidity” of US President Joe Biden is now a “threat to the West”.
    Mr Bolt said Biden's recent climate summit was a "disgraceful farce".
    “I am just gobsmacked that Biden ... insulted the intelligence of 39 other world leaders — including our Prime Minister Scott Morrison — by making them listen to the ravings of a bizarre parade of alarmists, mystics, New Age tribal women and even a teenager".
    Mr Bolt said with "no scientists around" at the summit, anyone "could claim any wild thing".
    He said the "global warming scare" is now a "religion - with a touch of Marxism." "

    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (22nd June 2021), Bill Ryan (23rd June 2021), Brigantia (22nd June 2021), Deux Corbeaux (28th April 2021), ExomatrixTV (16th July 2022), Gwin Ru (22nd June 2021), Matthew (22nd June 2021)

  5. Link to Post #63
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,343
    Thanks
    39,271
    Thanked 33,389 times in 4,323 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, The Disastrous Flop of "Green" Energy and the "Green New Deal"

    90 WIND TURBINES Get Demolished, Blown To Pieces: The Myth Of Renewable Wind Power

    by Steve St Angelo of SRSrocco Report
    June 21, 2021 by IWB

    More evidence of the absurdity called “Green Renewable Energy” occurred last month as 90 Mitsibushi wind turbines were demolished in New Mexico. Thus, the BIG JOKE is that Renewable Energy is really Non-Renewable as a large percentage of old wind and solar power units end up in landfills. With tons of explosives, these 90 wind turbines were demolished and mostly sent to the landfill.
    [...]
    I continue to find more and more evidence showing just how NON-RENEWABLE Green Energy really is and why it’s not an Energy Savior.

    According to the What’s Up With That article, When wind turbines are no longer useful: They get explosive demolition:
    Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, Maryland, USA (acting as Explosives Design and Performance Subcontractor to Main Demolition Contractor, Dallas Demolition of Houston, Texas who was working for RiverCap Ventures of Rocky River, Ohio, the General Demolition Contractor) performs the successful explosives felling of 90, Mitsubishi 1000A Wind Turbines in New Mexico.
    No effort was made to preserve foundations or other wind farm infrastructure. CDI’s crew felled the 90 Units in two (2) mobilizations to the site, permitting the Wind Farm Owner to complete salvage of blades and drive-train elements from some of the wind turbines to provide replacement parts for similar Units they operate at other wind farm locations. The Units were safely felled, exactly per plan, and ahead of schedule.

    If you read the BOLD text from the article above, NO EFFORT was made to preserve the foundations or other wind farm infrastructure. While some blades and wind turbine parts were salvaged as replacement parts for other wind farms, a large percentage of the wind scrap made it to the landfill.

    According to this article, MHI wins largest ever wind turbine order; Mitsubishi provided the 1000A Wind Turbines for the Aragonne Mesa Wind Farm that was erected at the end of 2006 and early 2007. So, it seems that these Mitsubishi Wind Turbines and blades only had a 14-year lifespan… LOL. I read that GE has a contract to install new 145 MW larger wind turbines to replace the (90) 1 MW Mitsubishi wind turbines that were, again, only 14 years old.

    Here is a short video of the controlled explosive demolition of these 90 RENEWABLE WIND TURBINES;
    What is going to happen to the GE Wind Turbines that are installed this year to replace the Mitsubishi models in the next 15 years?? Any guesses?

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    avid (22nd June 2021), Bill Ryan (23rd June 2021), Brigantia (22nd June 2021), Matthew (22nd June 2021)

  7. Link to Post #64
    UK Avalon Member avid's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2010
    Location
    NW UK
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,875
    Thanks
    57,636
    Thanked 15,573 times in 2,645 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, The Disastrous Flop of "Green" Energy and the "Green New Deal"

    Many years ago, I remember acres of windfarms in Canada were trashed. Can’t source data, but that was discussed with Dutchsinse. He provided photographic evidence. Collapsed windmills, unused resources…
    The love you withhold is the pain that you carry
    and er..
    "Chariots of the Globs" (apols to Fat Freddy's Cat)

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to avid For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd June 2021), Brigantia (22nd June 2021), Gwin Ru (22nd June 2021)

  9. Link to Post #65
    Netherlands Avalon Member gini's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th January 2016
    Location
    Northern Thailand
    Posts
    903
    Thanks
    18,086
    Thanked 7,099 times in 889 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, The Disastrous Flop of "Green" Energy and the "Green New Deal"

    Tucker: Brace yourselves, climate lockdowns are coming.
    Climate Depot's Marc Morano reacts to climate activist fantasy for keeping emissions down on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight' 23 June

    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 23rd June 2021 at 11:32. Reason: embedded the video

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gini For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd June 2021), Gwin Ru (23rd June 2021)

  11. Link to Post #66
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,343
    Thanks
    39,271
    Thanked 33,389 times in 4,323 posts
    Last edited by Gwin Ru; 26th June 2021 at 12:03.

  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    avid (23rd June 2021), Bill Ryan (23rd June 2021), Hym (18th July 2021), onawah (26th June 2021), Stephanie (20th July 2021)

  13. Link to Post #67
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,973 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, The Disastrous Flop of "Green" Energy and the "Green New Deal"

    ROSA KOIRE - R.I.P ~ "A Freedom Fighter & Pioneer Forever Remembered"
    Age Of Truth TV
    10,965 views
    Premiered Jun 23, 2021
    1.1K
    73.2K subscribers

    (I've always found the presenters on Age of Truth to be quite creepy both in the way they look and they way they present, but credit them for giving the late Rosa Koire her due, at least.)

    "PREMIERE!!! - ROSA KOIRE - R.I.P. on AGE OF TRUTH TV - TODAY !!!
    JOIN US - LIVE-CHAT DISCUSSION:
    "A Freedom Fighter & Pioneer Forever Remembered"

    AGE OF TRUTH TV is paying tribute and homage to the late great Miss ROSA KOIRE, who sadly passed away, too soon, on the 30th of May 2021.

    This is a special program, dedicated to the memory of Rosa Koire who was American Author, Truth Researcher, Lecturer, Freedom Fighter, Director of the Post Sustainability Institute and former Forensic Commercial Real Estate Appraiser.

    It is with great sadness, in fact it is deeply shocking, that we have learned that the wonderful and truly magnificent ROSA KOIRE has passed away! 😓😥

    Rosa is no longer here to speak her truth, in fact THE truth, that she worked so hard to get out there to the world for many years. She helped so many people in waking up to what is going on, and she in fact described in detail in interviews, and her lectures all over the world and as an author in her eye-opening book "Behind the green mask" on U . N. Agenda 21 and Secrets Behind Global Sustainability. She detailed, everything that has been going on in the world right now. It is sad beyond words, that Rosa will not be with us right now to be a strong guiding light, and also in the future. She is needed right now more than ever.....

    Age Of Truth TV did several shows with her, and we will run 2 shows that we did with Rosa, for you today, after our tribute message. The first one was done at the Open Mind Conference in Skanderborg Denmark in 2013, and the second one was done in November 2019. And she worked relentlessly as always, in the last year and a half during the world crisis that we're all facing at the moment, to try and enlighten people about what she said, was the rollout of everything she's been warning the world about for many years.

    We don't know all of the details yet of death, but what we do know is that she died from a lengthy battle with lung cancer.

    We will be making a tribute show to Miss Rosa Koire tonight, in honor of her memory, her relentless, unstoppable energy and freedom fighting spirit 💗💗💗☮️

    We at AOT TV will always cherish, treasure and honor the work that she did for the world, for freedom and enlightenment, and personally I send her LOVE and respect, on her spiritual journey ahead 😞😎🙏🙏🙏

    Thank you for watching us! To begin with, we will air our first interview with Rosa from 2013, then the second show right after that, so it's gonna be a full night, full of information - and please spread Rosa´s message to the world 😘
    R.I.P from us at Age Of Truth TV - ROSA KOIRE!

    Age Of Truth TV presenter Lucas Alexander is interviewing Rosa Koire in both both shows."
    Last edited by onawah; 26th June 2021 at 22:27.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Alecs (2nd July 2022), Hym (18th July 2021), Peace in Oz (28th June 2021), RunningDeer (18th July 2021), Stephanie (20th July 2021)

  15. Link to Post #68
    Canada Avalon Member kfm27917's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th June 2019
    Location
    Garymede
    Language
    German
    Posts
    707
    Thanks
    14,477
    Thanked 5,361 times in 680 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, The Disastrous Flop of "Green" Energy and the "Green New Deal"

    Reality bites !

    Neoliberalism’s greatest success is about to be revealed as its greatest weakness. In the 1970s – the previous inflation that the central bank generals are trying to fight – the perceived threat came from over-powerful trade unions and a too-protective welfare safety net, which together, the neoliberals argued, had driven inflation out of control. Neoliberalism’s solution was to use recession to break the power of the unions and to use law to break the social security system. And it appeared to work. By the early 1990s, the economy was booming again, and the economic and political strife of the 1980s seemed to have faded into history.

    Unfortunately, this mainstream economics fable turns out to have been a myth at every turn. The true cause of inflation in the 1970s was rising energy prices – including the 1973 OPEC oil embargo – which drove the cost of everything upward. Even the recession – which economists and bankers credit Paul Volcker with creating – turns out to have been the result of the oil shock from the Iranian revolution and the Iran-Iraq war. And while neoliberal governments took the opportunity to crush unions and tear holes in social safety nets, what brought a brief return of prosperity in the 1990s was the opening up of new oil deposits in Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea, together with a banking deregulation that generated billions of dollars, pounds and euros in debt-based derivatives, underwritten by the anticipated profits from that new oil.

    So much for neoliberalism’s supposed success. But what about its weakness? An often-unseen consequence of the destruction of the traditional protections afforded to ordinary working people is that millions of us cultivated a wilful blindness to all of the things wrong with the way our employers were operating their organisations. We quickly learned that workers who spoke out or blew the whistle got fired. We also saw that once they’d been fired, they faced a lifetime of impoverishment on inadequate benefits supplemented with occasional, low-paid gig and zero-hours work. And so, we learned to turn a blind-eye, tick the boxes and settle for picking up our wages at the end of the week.

    Further up the ladder, a new middle class learned that the only way of getting a decent salary was to borrow the money to obtain a university degree. And once you had borrowed that money and got that foot on the salary ladder, you’d better keep your head down and your mouth shut, since that was the only way of avoiding getting kicked off the ladder again. And so, everyone from the bottom to the top of the hierarchy learned to look the other way. As Upton Sinclair famously put it:

    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

    To the technocrats charged with managing everything from businesses to nation states, our acquiescence has been taken as an endorsement of their rule and a measure of their supreme confidence. But they are deluded. As Margaret Heffernan explains, that weekly or monthly pay cheque is powerful:

    “What all this has shown is that money may be the richest area ever discovered for the study of unintended consequences. From which it should follow, but rarely does, that managers and compensation committees need to be tremendously thoughtful when deciding how to apply such a powerful, even irrational, motivator. Because money has a more complex influence on people than just making them work longer.”

    Among other things, this is why the story that nobody saw the 2008 crash coming is a myth. Everyone from the lowliest clerk to the most senior compliance director in all of the banks involved knew damned well that they were doling out loans to people who could never repay them. But the financial incentive to turn a blind-eye proved too great to prevent a problem morphing into a full-blown global crisis.

    The same thing has been happening with energy for at least the last two decades. Privately, physicists and engineers have told anyone prepared to listen that the whole idea of what we currently call “net zero” is pure fantasy. Running an economy on renewable energy is simple enough. But running this economy, with its voracious need to consume ever more energy with each passing day, using technologies which, at best, will replace around ten percent of our current energy usage, is simply impossible. But there again, it is not physicists and engineers who are driving the policy. And so, once again, the incentive to take the money and turn a blind-eye has proved irresistible.

    So long as “net zero” was off in some undefined future, we could play this game with few immediate consequences. If wind turbines weren’t being deployed quickly enough, then we could just move the target date. If there weren’t enough electric car charging points, we could just provide some additional grant funding and promise that it would all work out in the end. And sooner or later, someone would invent a super-battery to overcome the intermittency showstopper. Provided we didn’t do anything suicidally reckless, like undermining the global supply chains or declaring an economic war on one of the world’s biggest exporters of raw materials, we might have continued playing this game for decades to come.

    The problem though, is that events over the past two years have dramatically accelerated the trend of declining surplus energy to the point that non-renewable renewable energy-harvesting technologies (NRREHTs) are no longer just a sop to green protestors and a money spinner for the corporations that deploy them. With oil and gas going away, and with the coal-based infrastructure largely dismantled, NRREHTs are becoming essential to keeping the lights on… Except, of course, that the engineers who are supposed to make the system work – like the bankers before 2008 – know damned well that this project is a non-starter and that a coal-based Grid cannot accommodate a massive expansion of NRREHTs until or unless we have a massive expansion in storage technologies which have yet to even be invented. And while nobody is quite saying this in public, the bright green mask is slipping as the impossibility of the task becomes more apparent and more urgent, and the true cost of attempting it is realised. As Gill Plimmer at the Financial Times reported earlier this week:

    “Renewable energy developers are facing delays of up to a decade to connect new capacity to the electricity grid, threatening the government’s pledge to shift away from fossil fuels and meet net zero targets.

    “The UK recently set out ambitious new goals to more than double existing renewable generation capacity, adding 50 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030, 70GW of solar by 2035 and 24GW of nuclear by 2050. But developers say they are being told that they will have to wait six to 10 years to connect to the regional distribution networks because of constraints on National Grid’s network.”

    The problem is reported through the lens of inadequate state funding, excessive regulation and the complex structure of the quasi-private energy system. But as Plimmer reports, the fundamental problem is that successive governments have given the go-ahead for NRREHTs projects without thinking through how the Grid will accommodate them. As a result, National Grid’s proposed solution is to ban any future NRREHTs projects until the Grid is able to deal with them – something which will be anathema to pro-net zero politicians:

    “The company is proposing to upgrade the network on a project-by-project basis, building bigger substations and more overhead lines… However, the industry is concerned over the cost of improvements to the network, which are needed to shift from a system designed to serve large coal-powered plants close to urban centres to more dispersed renewables developments such as solar and wind farms.

    “Burdening smaller-scale projects with these transmission upgrade costs, which can be in the region of £12mn per substation, renders many projects unviable… It is also a postcode lottery as to how much they are charged.”

    In the past it was possible to assume that because these problems are far off in the future, clever people somewhere else would come up with viable solutions. But the sudden fall in supplies of oil and gas following two years of lockdown and the – frankly insane – decision by Europe to disconnect itself from one of the last suppliers of affordable oil and gas on the planet, have put us in a position where NRREHTs, nuclear and what remains of coal power are the only things standing in the way of mass hypothermia this winter.

    And when the lights go out, as they surely will the moment the wind stops blowing, the whole energy Ponzi scheme will go the way of the banking and finance system fourteen years ago. Once again, the economists and policy-makers will be asked why nobody saw it coming. Once again they will shuffle their feet, bow their heads and mumble something about black swans. And only later will we come to learn that everyone on the inside from the guy who reads your electricity meter right the way up to the Grid’s technical director knew all too well that it is impossible to run a complex modern economy on renewable energy… only by then it will be too late.

    https://consciousnessofsheep.co.uk/2...reality-bites/

  16. Link to Post #69
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,343
    Thanks
    39,271
    Thanked 33,389 times in 4,323 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, The Disastrous Flop of "Green" Energy and the "Green New Deal"

    ...

    ... Eminent Oxford Scientist Says Wind Power "Fails On Every Count"

    by Tyler Durden
    Sunday, Mar 26, 2023 - 01:00 PM

    Authored by Chris Morrison via DailySceptic.org,

    It could be argued that the basic arithmetic showing wind power is an economic and societal disaster in the making should be clear to a bright primary school child. Now the Oxford University mathematician and physicist, researcher at CERN and Fellow of Keble College, Emeritus Professor Wade Allison has done the sums. The U.K. is facing the likelihood of a failure in the electricity supply, he concludes.
    “Wind power fails on every count,” he says, adding that governments are ignoring “overwhelming evidence” of the inadequacies of wind power, “and resorting to bluster rather than reasoned analysis”.


    Professor Allison’s dire warnings are contained in a short paper recently published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation. He notes that the energy provided by the Sun is “extremely weak”, which is why it was unable to provide the energy to sustain even a small global population before the Industrial Revolution with an acceptable standard of living. A similar point was made recently in more dramatic fashion by the nuclear physicist Dr. Wallace Manheimer. He argued that the infrastructure around wind and solar will not only fail, “but will cost trillions, trash large portions of the environment and be entirely unnecessary”.

    In his paper, Allison concentrates on working out the numbers that lie behind the natural fluctuations in the wind. The full workings out are not complicated and can be assessed from the link above. He shows that at a wind speed of 20mph, the power produced by a wind turbine is 600 watts per square metre at full efficiency. To deliver the same power as the Hinkley Point C nuclear plant – 3,200 million watts – it would require 5.5 million square metres of turbine swept area.

    It is noted that this should be quite unacceptable to those who care about birds and other environmentalists. Of course, this concern does not seem to have materialised to date. Millions of bats and birds are calculated to be slaughtered by onshore wind turbines every year. Meanwhile, off the coast of Massachusetts, work is about to start on a giant wind farm, complete with permits to harass and likely injure almost a tenth of the population of the rare North Atlantic Right whale.

    When fluctuations in wind speed are taken into account in Allison’s formula, the performance of wind becomes very much worse. If the wind speed drops by half, the power available falls by a factor of eight. Almost worse, he notes, if the wind speed doubles, the power delivered goes up eight times, and the turbine has to be turned off for its own protection.



    The effect of the enhanced fluctuations is dramatic, as shown in the graph above. The installed nominal generating capacity in the EU and U.K. in 2021, shown by the brown dashed line, was 236 GW, but the highest daily output was only 103 GW on March 26th. The unreliability is shown to even greater effect in the second graph that plots the wind generated offshore in the U.K. in March last year.



    For eight days at the end of the month, power generation slumped, presumably, says Allison, because the wind speed halved. The 8.8 GW daily loss over the period was noted to be 1,000 times the capacity of the world largest grid storage battery at Moss Landings in California. When it comes to the enormous batteries needed to store renewable power, Allison notes the problems with safety, as well as mineral shortages. Batteries will never make good the failure of offshore wind farms, even for a week, and he points out they can fail for much longer than that.

    Others have recently looked in more detail at the costs of battery storage. The American lawyer and mathematician Francis Menton, who runs the Manhattan Contrarian site, reviewed recent official cost reports and found that “even on the most optimistic assumptions” the cost could be as high as a country’s GDP. On less optimistic assumptions, the capital cost alone could be 15 times annual GDP. Last year, Associate Professor Simon Michaux warned the Finnish Government that there were not enough minerals in the world to supply all the batteries needed for Net Zero. Michaux observed that the Net Zero project may not go fully “as planned”. Meanwhile, Menton concluded, with an opinion that some might consider unduly charitable: “It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the people planning the Net Zero transition have no idea what they are doing.”

    Professor Allison has done his sums based on basic physics and freely available information.
    “Whichever way you look at it, wind power is inadequate. It is intermittent and unreliable; it is exposed and vulnerable; it is weak with a short life-span,” he concludes.

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    avid (26th March 2023), Harmony (27th March 2023), Orph (26th March 2023)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 4

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts