Posted by onawah (here)
The only proofs Snoop offers are simply based on contradicting Tavares's proofs, not any other whistleblower info.
That is a HUGE discrepancy in logic and reasoning and any competent lawyer in a courtroom would be making a laughing stock out of such ridiculousness in very short order.
And using wikipedia as proof of anything? Give me a break!
The primary purpose of Agenda 21 according to what I have read is to dramatically reduce the population by any means necessary.
If old growth forests must be sacrificed in the process, their plans extend far into the future and forests will grow again; people are not so resilient.
Have you actually read the original document? When you say according to what you have read, will you share your sources?
I don't think it is necessary to make personally criticize . Ask yourself why you are so angry? It can be a wonderful point of self reflection.
posted by OnawahThat is a HUGE discrepancy in logic and reasoning and any competent lawyer in a courtroom would be making a laughing stock out of such ridiculousness in very short order
I would hire Snoop in a heartbeat if I needed a lawyer.Ad hominem, which stands for the Latin term argumentum ad hominem, is a response to a person's argument by attacking the person's character rather than the logic or content of the argument. Ad hominem remarks are often an example of fallacy, because they are irrelevant to the overall argument.