Fatal shootings at Christchurch Mosques in New Zealand

[PurpleLama]

Posted by BMJ (here)
Lisa Haven take on the manifesto after reading the 70 or so pages, it seems it was a very much leftist leaning document as opposed to the extreme right document it is being portrayed as by the MSM.

Meanwhile the tptw were busy scrubbing evidence of the event from the internet so that all we will be left with is their biased official narrative.

Furthermore, the media spin this event into implicating POTUS Trump and thereby further unjustly attacking his character.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=XXe5SxB-Olc

Lisa Haven
Published on Mar 18, 2019

Now, I am curious to read this document.

[BMJ]

Posted by Zanshin (here)
Here's to always seeking the bigger perspective.

Five Eyes alliance, anyone.

It could be also that the Australian and New Zealand government are scared out of their minds about being implicated in the attempt to rig the 2016 election in favour of Hillary Clinton and against POTUS Trump.

Imagine that the ANZAC's probably one of the closest and longest allies to the US trying to undermine a US election.

All hell is going to break loose here, and the question will be how can we every trust our government again?

And so in a preemptive act the governments will try to censor the internet in advance and control the narrative about the Five eyes story and this act of terrorism would be just the ticket to pass some new more restrictive internet laws.

[BMJ]

Posted by PurpleLama (here)
Now, I am curious to read this document.

Here it is PurpleLama, links below:

Link, under the title "The Great Replacement":

Link, in ZIP:

P.S. In light of possible illegality of even linking this document I have deleted the above links. See post 116.

[Hervé]

Posted by BMJ (here)
[...]

Five Eyes alliance, anyone.
[...]
And so in a preemptive act the governments will try to censor the internet in advance and control the narrative about the Five eyes story and this act of terrorism would be just the ticket to pass some new more restrictive internet laws.

Well, lookey there: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1281844 ... no indepent network allowed...

[Hervé]

ALERT: Brighteon.com video platform under extreme threat from internet infrastructure providers, forced to delete all New Zealand shooting videos, essentially “at gunpoint” by the globalist controllers of the ‘net

by: Mike Adams Natural News
Wednesday, March 20, 2019

(Natural News) This is an emergency alert concerning Brighteon.com, the free speech video platform alternative to YouTube.

I’m writing this at 12:45 am, March 21st. The Brighteon platform is now under extreme threat by upstream infrastructure providers over users posting footage of the New Zealand Christchurch shooting. We are being threatened to remove all the videos or face complete annihilation online, starting with being de-platformed from infrastructure providers, followed by legal action from none other than the nation of Australia (not even New Zealand itself, but Australia and it’s “Office of the eSafety Commissioner.”)

We anticipated this exact scenario many months ago, and we have been feverishly building alternative internal infrastructure to eliminate any dependencies on upstream infrastructure providers, to the extent that such a configuration is possible. However, we are still several months away from completion of that build out phase. Sadly, over the next few hours we are being forced — essential “at gunpoint” (the irony being completely lost of the fascists who now control the ‘net) — to delete all videos containing footage of the New Zealand shooting.

If we refuse to take this action, then ALL the videos on Brighteon will essentially be de-platformed, and none of them will be viewable by the public. The entire website will be annihilated.

Make no mistake: We are facing extreme online fascism, censorship and authoritarian speech police who are exploiting the New Zealand operation to roll out a totalitarian police state across the ‘net. The excuse we are being given is that hosting or sharing the videos is “promoting violence” — an absurd claim on its face. If videos that depict violence are so harmful to the public, then why did the entire mainstream media play the 9/11 twin towers attack videos a million times over, burning the imagery into the minds of the American people? In that attack, over 3,500 Americans died, yet no one claimed that showing the video was promoting violence.

If violent action sequences are “promoting violence,” then why isn’t every Hollywood action movie banned? Why aren’t the million other violent YouTube videos banned? Why is it perfectly acceptable to show video footage of Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich torturing and killing Jews in concentration camps? Have we really reached the point where videos that show Jews being mass murdered are perfectly okay, but videos that show followers of Islam being murdered are criminalized? I thought all genocide was evil, and burying it through censorship is not going to make the hatred go away. If we are to recognize the source of these conflicts and acts of violence, we must be willing to see what actually took place. But today, even viewing certain particular videos is now essentially considered a multi-national crime.

Somehow, this New Zealand shooting video — in which rifle brass disappears mid-air, by the way, like magical ammo — is being invoked to justify the ultimate free speech crackdown across the ‘net. Anyone who dares examine the forensic video evidence, ask intelligent questions about the shooting or question the official narrative is now being threatened with internet-wide de-platforming and possible legal action.

We have reached the state of “total censorship” on the ‘net. This is the beginning of the end of humanity, since no voices, views or opinions that contradict “official narratives” are going to be allowed anywhere online.

As InfoWars also covered earlier today, the next escalation of censorship will involve banning URLs from browsers, meaning Chrome, FireFox, etc. will not even allow you type in “Brighteon.com” or “Infowars.com” or any other site the globalist controllers don’t want you to see. They will use another false flag shooting as justification to ban any URL they want, always in the name of “public safety.”

In truth, globalists believe that anyone who thinks for themselves is a threat to public safety. Therefore, all non-conformists, dissenters, independent thinkers or outspoken voices of truth must be systematically silenced by all the tech giants, including: Google, Apple, Twitter, Amazon, YouTube, Snapchat, Pinterest and others. Together, they now operate a global cabal — an online mafia — that demands absolute obedience to irrational demands.

Sadly, unless either the Trump administration or We the People rise up and overthrow these techno-fascist monstrosities, humanity is now enslaved under absolute online tyranny. No independent thought is allowed from this day forward.

In terms of practical actions, we have been building an “underground” information hub for many months — a new solution that will make content available to human eyes but invisible to all search engines and computer algorithms. Sadly, human truth is going to have to move to “underground” status to evade de-platforming efforts by totalitarian fascists.

I will record a strong video follow-up message in the coming days and post it on Brighteon, unless the internet tyrants annihilate it first. We are working hard to protect free speech, but the globalists are now holding loaded guns at our head and saying they will pull the trigger if we do not comply. For the moment, we are forced to comply in order to save all the other videos on the platform. However, in the long run, we have no intention whatsoever to comply with tyranny and authoritarianism.

– Mike Adams

[DaveToo]

Posted by Zanshin (here)
DaveToo - I would suggest that the 'vanishing brass' footage is more a CGI embellished segment of the video portrayal of
an entirely fabricated event, as opposed to a bogus insert into actual footage.

I take this position for all the 'bloopers' listed in post#90 amongst others.

As to motive for yet another false-flag (whether there were some casualties or not) -
I feel one need look no further than Lisa Haven's vid. above.

The barely contained emotion in her voice as she defends her conservative right position against
a POTUS threatening left indicates to me exactly the sort of divisiveness these events are engineered for.

Here's to always seeking the bigger perspective.

Thanks Zanshin.
We can add a few more bullets (pardon the pun) to the list of bullets in post #90.

1. Why in the world would the terrorist stop on a main street, a hundred feet or so from the mosque,
and start shooting dozens of precious rounds at a possible target in the far distance?

To attract attention from passersby on the street?
To deplete his ammunition?

2. Why does his music stop whenever he starts shooting?

3. Why do the corpses look dummy-like?

4. Woman on ground at curb near car, "Help me, help me..."
He shoots her up close. And then a second later "Help me, help me..." AGAIN!!!

Just watched the video again for a second time, today, much more closely than the first time.
It sure looks like a fake to me. Video-game like.
Corpses that look like dummies. No blood from most of 'victims' etc. etc.

[Didgevillage]

I think nobody died there. It's all fake. As Jim Stone points out, the "shooter" is gone back to Israel, where he will never be arrested or even questioned.

Cui bono?

[Hervé]

Some other far outfield fallout:


Bookstore chain removes Jordan Peterson's books from sale after Christchurch attacks

Susan Edmunds Stuff
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:30 UTC

© Mikko Stig/Rex/Shutterstock

Bookstore chain Whitcoulls appears to have stopped selling controversial right-wing author and speaker Jordan Peterson's book 12 Rules for Life amid concerns about "disturbing material" circulating around the Christchurch attacks.

A staff member at Whitcoulls in Albany said it was not available in any stores around the country. She did not know whether that was a permanent move. A search for the book on the chain's website does not return any hits.

Jordan Peterson was pictured with a fan wearing an "I'm a proud Islamophobe" t-shirt during his recent trip to New Zealand. The photo circulated on Twitter in the wake of the Christchurch mosque attacks.

The book contains little reference to Islam but Peterson has previously been criticised for his description of Muhammad as a "warlord".

In an apparent email to a customer shared on Twitter, a representative said that the book was "currently unavailable which is a decision that Whitcoulls has made in light of some extremely disturbing material being circulated prior, during and after the Christchurch attacks.

"As a business which takes our responsibilities to our communities seriously, we believe it would be wrong to support the author at this time."

Whitcoulls has been approached for comment, but has not so far confirmed the email, or their stance.

Jess Berentson-Shaw, of thinktank The Workshop, said it was positive if businesses in New Zealand were showing that they valued an inclusive society "and are prepared to follow that through".

There is still a listing on the Whitcoulls website for people to order Mein Kampf, by Adolf Hitler.


Related:

• Jordan Peterson's '12 Rules for Life: A compass for the lost
• NewsReal #30: Christchurch Massacre - Don't Fall For The Manipulation

======================================================


"They" (orchestra + conductor + sponsors) really don't like him because "they" hate his message to individuals... reminds me of that Ukrainian concert pianist being shunt...

[Flash]

Posted by Hervé (here)
Some other far outfield fallout:


Bookstore chain removes Jordan Peterson's books from sale after Christchurch attacks

Susan Edmunds Stuff
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:30 UTC

© Mikko Stig/Rex/Shutterstock

Bookstore chain Whitcoulls appears to have stopped selling controversial right-wing author and speaker Jordan Peterson's book 12 Rules for Life amid concerns about "disturbing material" circulating around the Christchurch attacks.

A staff member at Whitcoulls in Albany said it was not available in any stores around the country. She did not know whether that was a permanent move. A search for the book on the chain's website does not return any hits.

Jordan Peterson was pictured with a fan wearing an "I'm a proud Islamophobe" t-shirt during his recent trip to New Zealand. The photo circulated on Twitter in the wake of the Christchurch mosque attacks.

The book contains little reference to Islam but Peterson has previously been criticised for his description of Muhammad as a "warlord".

In an apparent email to a customer shared on Twitter, a representative said that the book was "currently unavailable which is a decision that Whitcoulls has made in light of some extremely disturbing material being circulated prior, during and after the Christchurch attacks.

"As a business which takes our responsibilities to our communities seriously, we believe it would be wrong to support the author at this time."

Whitcoulls has been approached for comment, but has not so far confirmed the email, or their stance.

Jess Berentson-Shaw, of thinktank The Workshop, said it was positive if businesses in New Zealand were showing that they valued an inclusive society "and are prepared to follow that through".

There is still a listing on the Whitcoulls website for people to order Mein Kampf, by Adolf Hitler.


Related:

• Jordan Peterson's '12 Rules for Life: A compass for the lost
• NewsReal #30: Christchurch Massacre - Don't Fall For The Manipulation

======================================================


"They" (orchestra + conductor + sponsors) really don't like him because "they" hate his message to individuals... reminds me of that Ukrainian concert pianist being shunt...

WHAT!!!

This is nut.

I hope Russia will come to our help for freedom of information and opinion - this is absolutely terrible to have to rely on a country like Russia for freedom of opinion.

I like the guy, he is a straight shooter, no manipulations from his side. He is fighting the manipulations of all kinds.

Incredible.

12 rules for becoming responsible is banned!!!!

And Mohamed WAS a warlord, it is written all through the Kuran for Allah's sake.

We are in Idiocracy society, no doubts.

[Hervé]

Orchestration ---> orchestra ---> conductor ---> sponsors...


France: 12 churches attacked, vandalized in a week

Thomas D. Williams Breitbart
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 02:47 UTC

A screenshot from footage shot inside the church © Twitter / Stephane Larue

A dozen Catholic churches have been desecrated across France over the period of one week in an egregious case of anti-Christian vandalism.

The recent spate of church profanations has puzzled both police and ecclesiastical leaders, who have mostly remained silent as the violations have spread up and down France.

Last Sunday, marauders set fire to the church of Saint-Sulpice - one of Paris' largest and most important churches - shortly after the twelve-o'clock Mass.

Police have concluded that the fire was the result of arson and are now looking for possible suspects. The restoration of the church from the damage caused by the fire will reportedly cost several hundred million euros.

In Nimes (department of the Gard), near the border with Spain, the church of Notre-Dame des Enfants was desecrated in a particularly odious way, with vandals painting a cross with human excrement, looting the main altar and the tabernacle, and stealing the consecrated hosts, which were discovered later among piles of garbage.

Likewise, the church of Notre-Dame in Dijon, in the east of the country, suffered the sacking of the high altar and the hosts were also taken from the tabernacle, scattered on the ground, and trampled.

In Lavaur, in the southern department of the Tarn, the village church was assaulted by young men, who twisted one arm of a representation of the crucified Christ to make it appear that he was making an obscene gesture.

In the peripheries of Paris, in the department of Yvelines, several churches have suffered profanations of varying importance, in Maisons-Laffitte and in Houilles.

Although commentators have been reluctant to attach a particular religious or cultural origin to the profanations, they all share an evident anti-Christian character.

In recent months, anti-Semitic gangs have desecrated Jewish cemeteries, signing their actions with swastikas. In the case of the desecration of Catholic churches, the vandalism has spoken for itself: ridicule of the figure of Christ on the cross and desecration of major altars.

The Catholic hierarchy has kept silent about the episodes, limited themselves to highlighting that anti-Christian threat and expressing hope that politicians and police will get to the bottom of the crimes.

Reports indicate that 80 percent of the desecration of places of worship in France concerns Christian churches and in the year 2018 this meant the profanation of an average of two Christian churches per day in France, even though these actions rarely make the headlines.

In 2018, the Ministry of the Interior recorded 541 anti-Semitic acts, 100 anti-Muslim acts, and 1063 anti-Christian acts.

======================================================


Well, somebody wrote this (at least in the last century if not in the one before last):

"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

[sigma6]

They're taking down these videos as fast as users put them up, even though there is no actual violence shown in the clip... Mike Adams said he was essentially threatened at gunpoint and forced to remove this from his site...


Shell Casings Disappear CGI Editing Proof Christchurch, NZ Shooting Was A False Flag

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SpdRzQZAGxw

[sigma6]

.
.
Ole Dammegard & Alfred Lambremont Webre Ask You To Question The Christchurch Event

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=wLoz5mQtXuo

[Hervé]

Posted by sigma6 (here)
They're taking down these videos as fast as users put them up, even though there is no actual violence shown in the clip... Mike Adams said he was essentially threatened at gunpoint and forced to remove this from his site...
[...]

Hi sigma6, I merged your recently posted thread with this pre-existing one on the same subject.

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Kiwis don't seem to be too keen on handing over their firearms willingly:

Out of an estimated 1.2 million registered guns, New Zealand police report that as of Tuesday night, 37 firearms have been surrendered nationwide, according to BuzzFeed.

No accounting was provided of how many people owned those guns, the types of firearms, or where they were surrendered.

The reports of citizens disarming themselves came after a Monday announcement by Prime minister Jacinda Ardern that several "in principle decisions" on gun control have been made by Cabinet ministers, while praising residents who have surrendered their guns to police.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...-many-actually

Of course, they are citing Buzzfeed, so who knows how accurate this report actually is. But if it is accurate, then it is similar to numbers seen in New Jersey when they tried to ban certain firearms by asking citizens to turn them over willingly.

Florida also tried to enact a law taking guns away from veterans with PTSD, etc., but last I heard about that, they went door-to-door about 4 or 5 times before the first fatal shoot-out occurred. In other words, the police don't have enough men to take all the guns back, at least in Florida. We'll see how New Zealanders feel about this.


Had a laugh about this one:

Police slam fake firearm hand-in forms

Police are seething as the new firearms laws bring with it a host of not-so-funny practical jokers.

Some members of the public are clearly unhappy about the law change, which bans military style semi-automatic firearms and asks for anyone in possession of such a weapon to hand it in to police.

"Some people have decided it is a good use of their time to misuse the form and submit 'fake' notifications to hand in weapons," said Assistant Commissioner Tusha Penny in a statement.

"While these individuals may be short of productive work to do, police are not. In the current environment this is unacceptable," she continued.

"These vexatious forms are a huge waste of police time and resources which could be put to better use."

On Thursday, police set up an 0800 number dedicated to firearm changes, which has proven to be in high demand.

The number received 474 calls by 11am - at one point, 127 people called within the space of one hour.

Over a thousand people have contacted police to hand in their firearms. Currently, an amnesty is in place that allows people to surrender their guns without legal action against them.

The amnesty period will run until further notice.

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-z...-in-forms.html


New Zealand police put a form online for people wanting to turn in their firearms. The chans instantly seized on the opportunity and spammed them with tons of fake form submissions.

Examples:













"Police are seething..."

They already changed the settings so that only people with NZ IPs can submit a form, but channers were using VPNs already, so I'm not sure how much difference that will make.

This is even better than people reporting fake "hate crimes" to British police chat rooms.

Supposedly, the text field for "accessories" can accept a full gigabyte of text data, so...

New Zealand Police Forced to Shut Down Gun Confiscation Website Due to DoS Attack

And some folks say gun owners don’t have a rebellious streak in them. With less than 24 hours, the NZ Police was forced to shut down their gun confiscation website due to massive amounts of online trolling.

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/20...to-dos-attack/

[ThePythonicCow]

Miles Mathis has a detailed, 29 page analysis from a guest writer, Uncle Owen. He posted the paper on his usual page, http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html. The paper itself is a 29 page pdf, which can be found at http://mileswmathis.com/xchurch.pdf .

Miles guest writer, and Miles himself, find a long list of inconsistencies in the event, and conclude that this was a big time scam.

The primary discussion of this event is on the 4chan thread https://8ch.net/pol/res/12922726.html -- Beware that moderation standards on 4chan are ... well more or less non-existent by design. There are several links to the video on that thread, most of which are no longer valid, as the video keeps being taken down, and then reuploaded by someone else.

[BMJ]

No surprises, the manifesto is now considered illegal in New Zealand, I imagine Australia will follow suite.


New Zealand bans terror suspect's racist manifesto; citizens told to 'destroy any copies'

New Zealand's government on Saturday banned a racist, angry manifesto written by the suspected gunman of two recent mosque shootings in Christchurch that killed 50 people, arguing that the 74-page document "promotes murder and terrorism."

New Zealand's Office of Film and Literature Classification issued a statement officially classifying the manifesto – titled "The Great Replacement" and authored by the alleged 28-year-old shooter – "objectionable" under the country's law.

“There is an important distinction to be made between ‘hate speech’, which may be rejected by many right-thinking people but which is legal to express, and this type of publication, which is deliberately constructed to inspire further murder and terrorism," New Zealand's Chief Censor David Shanks said in a statement.

“It crosses the line.”

The alleged gunman, a self-described white supremacist, is accused of fatally shooting 50 people on March 15 in a rampage in two mosques that he live video-recorded on a helmet he wore. He linked the manifesto on his Twitter account and mailed a copy to the office of New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern.

The country's government banned the reported gunman's 17-minute video earlier in the week as well as semi-automatic rifles.

Officials say both the manifesto and video qualify as objectionable under a 1993 New Zealand law that gives the government discretion to ban certain materials for the public good.

An objectionable classification in this particular case is considered to be a justifiable limit on freedom of expression under New Zealand's Bill of Rights.

The suspect's manifesto consists of a rant about white genocide and advocates for "an atmosphere of fear” against Muslims. He describes himself as an ethno-nationalist and fascist and pays homage to other racist killers such as Dylann Roof, who shot and killed nine African-Americans in a church in Charleston, South Carolina. He says in the manifesto that the plot in New Zealand was two years in the making.

“It promotes, encourages and justifies acts of murder and terrorist violence against identified groups of people, ” Shanks said.

“It identifies specific places for potential attack in New Zealand, and refers to the means by which other types of attack may be carried out. It contains justifications for acts of tremendous cruelty, such as the deliberate killing of children.”

Violent terrorist: Who is the white supremacist suspected in New Zealand mosque shootings?

Under the New Zealand law, it is considered an offense to "posses or distribute" objectionable materials such as the manifesto. People who have downloaded the document, or printed it out, should "destroy any copies," officials said.

"New Zealanders can all play a part in denying those who exhort hatred, killing and terror. If you have a copy of this publication, delete or destroy it," Shanks said. "If you see it, report it. Do not support the murderous objectives of its author by republishing or distributing it.”

The manifesto has been widely reported by media, meaning some New Zealanders are likely to have read portions of it even if they have not seen a first-hand copy.

Link: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...zen.yandex.com

[BMJ]

Posted by Hervé (here)
Bookstore chain Whitcoulls appears to have stopped selling controversial right-wing author and speaker Jordan Peterson's book 12 Rules for Life amid concerns about "disturbing material" circulating around the Christchurch attacks.

[ThePythonicCow]

Jim Stone (http://jimstone.is) points out a continuity error in the filming of the shootings at Christchurch:

===========

I can now shamelessly and without question state the Christchurch shooting was fake
The video was either done in multiple takes, or was created by an AI that screwed up. The mosque may or may not even be real. It is THAT BAD. I'll try to log in later to upload the most damning evidence yet, but for now I will embed it from elsewhere.

In the video, a man was laying in the hallway, not wearing socks. The shooter runs past him to "get his other gun." On the way back in the same victim is laying in approximately the same position (everyone moved a little, but it is obviously at least trying to be the same scene AND THE SAME VICTIM IS WEARING BLUE SOCKS. Not possible if he really is dead on the floor.

FOLKS, THIS IS WHY THE VIDEO IS BANNED, AND IS A CRIME TO HAVE IN NEW ZEALAND - IT HAS CONTINUITY PROBLEMS EITHER INTRODUCED BY AN AI THAT DID NOT REMEMBER IT ALL, OR CAUSED BY DOING THE VIDEO IN MORE THAN ONE TAKE. HERE IS A PROBLEM NO ONE CAN ARGUE, THAT BY ITSELF PROVES THIS SHOOTING DID NOT HAPPEN:



This image is hosted by the enemy, posted by the "good guys" where the enemy can remove it. So save it just in case it vanishes before I actually log in to host it from here. This error on the part of the production crew is in the original video also. GAME OVER, I know there are over a thousand people from NZ who read this site and I suggest they print this ASAP and start showing it to people, along with a clear explanation as to what is going on. NZ is getting REAMED by this shooting, Clinton&Co need a safe place to set up a new fiefdom and unfortunately NZ was all too willing to allow this to happen. Now I believe Podesta really was there helping to stage this and that the video was a complete production that was simply played as a "live stream" after the final cut.

===========

[Hervé]

Posted by Paul (here)
Jim Stone (http://jimstone.is) points out a continuity error in the filming of the shootings at Christchurch:
[...]

Yes: see post # 81 and lists of continuity bloopers in posts # 90 and #106.

[A Voice from the Mountains]

There are some other videos circulating showing the "aftermath" of the attack and it's totally bizarre. Very little blood to be seen anywhere (especially compared to real murder scenes, which I notice some law enforcement officers have been kind of enough to post on 8chan), and people sitting up looking around one minute, then acting as if they're dead, then getting up and bumbling out the door, all while a bunch of people are buzzing around mumbling to each other. And virtually no blood.

It looks to me like crisis acting is a veritable industry these days.

Btw none of these videos survive on YouTube, but I did manage to download one from some obscure video site. If anyone wants a link I can dig around and find it again. Trying to find anything on YouTube is useless.