Oh i see, but no, he is not, he has not said anything remotely unique in all his time "speaking up", it's just a rehash of previously known material, and also he keeps changing the story as years pass, that's not a good sign of honesty, that's more like a "new marketing strategy". So excuse me but all he does to bring attention to him, and how he is considered as a fake/conman, is mostly his fault due to how he exposes himself out there, and not how other people treat him
Sequence of events is always of primary importance:
say something stupid -> people consider you stupid because of what you said
And not the other way around:
People consider you stupid out of nowhere -> Say something stupid to prove them right
We all know how the tail wagging the dog looks like
Nothing, absolutely nothing he has said is new info, he has basically just rehashed something someone else said, or picked up from movies. He keeps changing the story as times goes by, and it's always something already previously known but refactored into his own story
Show me something unique from him, if you have it. He has not been doing that since ever (day one), but prove me wrong, and if i show you that whatever you quote him on is something someone else already said or is a reinterpretation of someone else's ideas/words then what? Will you accept he has nothing and say so openly?