Yes, I returned to Avalon and did a deep dive (including that outstanding thread) after the Goode deposition broke. I had already begun to have extreme difficulty continuing to suspend disbelief. The resignation letter (and corresponding backtrack/blaming his audience), Goode's increasingly absurd stories, among so many other things contributed to that.Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Derek, Avalon members have been investigating David Wilcock for many years (there are dozens of threads featuring his name in the title), and also Pete Peterson. You may not have seen this fairly major thread:Posted by derek (here)
I'm going to let Avalon take the investigation from here. I provided a data point that needed to be acknowledged. Beyond that, I don't care enough about Wilcock to continue to obsess over him like I wasted almost 15 years of my life doing.
Doc Barham I hardly got to know, and the one time I met him (when Kerry and I interviewed Peterson with Wilcock) he was extremely quiet and stayed in the background almost the whole time.
The fact that Barham strongly recommended to Wilcock that he should meet with Pete Peterson (after which Wilcock suggested we all travel to meet Peterson together) says something, for sure, given that it later became clear that Peterson was a fraud.
Wilcock always refused to acknowledge that, despite a mountain of hard, damning evidence that emerged later. (Do see the Peterson thread linked above.)
Avalon has done exceptional work. Jay Weidner's admission that he deleted the Peterson interviews because he was a "senile old man" who would say "absurd things" that he said "could just be a dream" and "couldn't keep his story straight" was also very enlightening.
My current analysis leads me to believe Peterson et al (who at the time was billed as the biggest Camelot insider ever) was designed to destroy Camelot and Wilcock. When Wilcock sticks to consciousness science (such as in Source Field Investigations, and the free books/content he had on his website before that) he represents a threat to the establishment. I truly think they did a psych eval on him and designed several manicured handlers disguised as insiders (exploiting his naivete, low self esteem, need for validation/importance, and potentially his rocky childhood relationship with his father combined with his close relationship with his "defense industry inventor" grandfather . . . in Petersons case)
I was relived and not surprised when you mentioned in a different thread that you counted Arthur Nuemann as one of the few real insiders. At one point he said in an interview (I'm going from memory) "just go to los alamos national labs .gov website and search for gravity shielding." I did that, and lo and behold there is a paper saying "we all know gravity shielding isn't real, but if it was here is exactly how it would work." Went through pages and pages of equations, exhibits, charts, graphs, etc explaining that science.
Wilcock was close to explaining that science as well. It was what he did best. He got destroyed early on when that became apparent (in my strong opinion). At this point, it is illogical to think there hasn't been some degree of conscious participation on his part (blackmail induced or not).
Three times I have lent out a copy of Source Field Investigations. Three times I have not gotten my book back. It's now nearly a lost cause as it's subtitle contains the words "2012 prophecies."
More importantly, beyond destroying Camelot and the up and coming Wilcock, this did serious damage to the entire field of alternative research. Whatever operations were at work paid off in massive dividends.
I think the truth will come out eventually. Until that time I continue to be impressed by the second-to-none research here at Avalon.
Bookmarks